TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

toymachien3 Archive

View 2 posts and 39 comments by toymachien3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
155

Progresstoymachien3/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:42 AM
97

Activism/Supporttoymachien3/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:19 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Are there also male delusions of safety?
/r/MensRights05/04/25 12:39 PM
-2

Yeah I said nothing wrong. Just shows how much misogyny is present on this subreddit. So much hate here.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 07:50 AM
-24

It's not all women though. There are some like this but not all. I'm not really bothered by it honestly, in my opinion, when you come more and more into your masculinity it isn't a problem anymore.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 08:31 PM
-4

You have those rights don't you? I mean nothing is legally stopping you isn't it? No cop is gonna arrest you for saying hi to a person.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 10:57 PM
1

I’m no expert I’m sorry. I think I’m opposed to hoarding scarce basic goods.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 07:37 AM
1

Feminism also ruined life for many women, who cannot be in supportive roles for their husbands, but are instead forced into work also.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 10:12 PM
0

No apologies for peace, sir. We really have to tackle climate change instead of shooting eachother.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 10:01 PM
0

Protection provision and leadership doesn’t mean fighting nor murdering others.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:31 PM
1

I don’t know I haven’t thought about that before. I think it’s sad that there are people motivated to do violence, any violence. I don’t think violence is necessary nor justified. I think anything can be achieved through peaceful means.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:46 PM
1

It’s nice and brave your opinion. I like it.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:42 PM
0

I’m not sure if those at the top make it worse economically for those at the bottom. But there should be a limit on rich people’s ability to acquire hard assets, like housing. It’s not bad for the economy if a multimillionaire goes to a restaurant every day. But it’s bad if he buys 30 houses and only lives in 1.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:38 PM
6

That’s good for you. I’m happy you feel that way. That can be your experience. But it’s not nice to say all men should feel this way. Experiences differ and not all men need to be a shield. ;-) Some men can be a model too. (Or something else) And even women could be a shield too. So let’s leave it up to everyone to decide for themselves who they want to be.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 03:04 PM
0

Develop rationality as opposed to irrationality ofcourse. It’s name is The Enlightenment. (Started in the 17th century)
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:43 PM
3

The flaw in your logic is that I wasn’t talking about drones fighting men. I was talking about drone warfare as an alternative to what we have today. So: drones fighting drones. Just like we have other forms of warfare too: cultural, economical, technological (hacking), epidemical (diseases), … Modern warfare and equal rights for men. No more male humans fighting other male humans for the cause of warfare. That’s my proposition. And there are many different versions of masculinity. We have no ne…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:39 PM
8

A man doesn’t need to be a shield lol. Are you crazy. This is the instrumental thinking women have of men all the time. Men are men. Not weapons of combat.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:27 PM
1

Yea but we could
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:25 PM
-4

Yes they could breach international law like they do today. I don’t know bro, I’m just saying some things. I’m not an expert but I don’t find it okay that men go to war.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 02:21 PM
-4

Having an army of men, would be illegal. Under my view. No funding allowed for governmental workers who fight physically for the country. That’s freedom and safety for men. By law: no threat of death.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:18 PM
-3

It would be illegal for men to kill eachother. Which would mean conscription would be never done. Which means men would not be able to participate in war anymore. War would be fought by different means than men. Technological, economical, environmental, epidemical, cultural. Many different options. But no men who die and fight directly.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:16 PM
26

In my opinion female politicians should not be allowed to make decisions concerning war. It is so blatantly hypocritical.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:14 PM
15

Men cannot speak up. They are silenced. Muted. They do not get heard. Because nobody wants to listen.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:37 AM
16

Tactics: Implicit toxic shaming, Ignoring and trivialising of men, Belittling and ridiculising their behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:36 AM
2

Because they don’t think about you nor care for you and your wellbeing. It’s like thinking about the rights your phone has. You also don’t do that. Women are not to blame really, it just has never been a reality for them, to care about men.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:34 AM
6

They have never… and never will… give ANY fucks about ANY male whatsoever. Why do you think thousands get brought to and slaughtered on the battlefield every year?? You think that’s a coincidence???!
/r/MensRights10/03/25 08:57 AM
6

Brother lower your expectations. You think they would ever see males as something else than the people who in their eyes… must serve them? They have never experienced something else, they believe all men are there FOR THEM and not valuable otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 08:54 AM
1

In my view, they don't. Most people who still believe women cannot do anything wrong, are merely inexperienced. But that does not mean all of them are bad. Most of them are nice people, too. In general (in my opinion) they tend to be more arrogant and opinionated, but they also tend to be more agreeable, once you get them on your side. So they can show loyalty but also contempt. It really depends on the people you are dealing with.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 09:50 PM
1

Toxic guy. Honestly most people on the internet are bad. If they would be good they wouldn’t be there in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 05:01 PM
1

Great idea, thank you
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:36 PM
2

Yes, quality over quantity. One true best friend beats being a popular kid.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:30 PM
1

The beach and it’s activities are also a great third place!
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:27 AM
1

I agree. It’s a hard problem for many people, I believe… humans were meant to live in groups, yet many of us don’t!
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:14 AM
1

It's about MGTOW and about accepting positive relationships in your life when they come up. But not relying on them in the first place. That being said, you do need some companionship day to day, so go to the public library or go to the gym or join a sports club or get a pet or get some art lessons weekly or go watch a movie ... etc etc.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:56 PM
7

Nothing wrong with going to a massage parlor once in a while ;-)
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:52 PM
6

Loneliness is a hard problem to solve. Because you need deep emotional connections to others to truly heal it. People you can genuinely trust on. But those people are rare. And you must also have luck to meet them. If you join a club somewhere, or do volunteering, it sadly doesn't actually guarantee that people you vibe with are there. Luckily companionship takes away some of the pain. Hence why I'm almost always at the public library when it's open. haha
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:47 PM
8

I'd love to make this a political reality. I just need a large building, cleaning personnel, furniture, and security staff. Government subsidies or from a rich philanthropist. A shop with art and paper supplies inside. And a coffee shop/lunch place in it too. Opening hours: every day: 9 am to midnight. It's actually super easy to heal the loneliness epidemic and crisis. But there is a lack of political will.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:38 PM
10

Exactly! But ideally a third place would also have the opportunity for interaction. Like basketball courts, skateboard parks... or my proposed art space! More specifically: a low barrier to interpersonal interaction and new connections
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:24 PM
2

I disagree. You can make alcohol prohibited in the space. And there are also other refuges for them available. Also they wouldn't really fit there because of the social norm of focused work in the space I'm proposing. But anyways, we need way more spaces like that, not just small. Public library isn't also infested by homeless or drug addicts so it's kinda the same principle. I don't hate that no when I see people reading books in public. And they aren't necessarily asking me to give them attent…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:20 PM
1

None of the easels would be asigned to anybody. After using the easle you clean it up. It's a come and go situation. Just like in the public library desks are available to be used by anyone for a certain amount of time.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:42 PM
6

When social media, internet, television, smartphone reels,... are used for distraction of negative thoughts and emotions while being alone in isolation (even if it's just in a bedroom at home) it's a toxic influence on your life. This has indeed been a very large toxic influence on society and also the normalisation of this behaviour is very toxic. This behaviour is not normal and should be eschewed. Just like drinking by yourself is. I also nostalgically think about the times were these options…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter