TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

trahloc Archive

View 0 posts and 346 comments by trahloc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Some people have extremely high anxiety and they don't get their shit together personally until years after they've mastered finances. it doesn't mean they don't have amazing personalities it just means they couldn't demonstrate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:38 PM
6

Holding someone to their own standard is not an asshole maneuver, it's testing your friend for hypocrisy and she failed miserably. Better to have fewer friends than friends who revel in the pain of the innocent.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 12:18 PM
7

It's like folks who want to eradicate poverty without realizing poverty is defined as a percentage and not an objective measurement. It's also amusing when people refuse to acknowledge revealed data by hundreds of thousands of people based on their private preferences and decisions vs their public surveyed answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:28 PM
–

It's no different than "It's ok to be white" pissing people off. They're used specifically to trigger racists and sexists because they can't let any benign phrase that humanizes those they hate go uncontested. It was eye opening to see how many sexist and racists walk among us promoting love and equality while having nothing but bile in their hearts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 03:19 PM
1

So you care more about character assassination than finding commonality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 02:20 AM
1

I had a buddy come to my place to get away from his ex (I was across the street). I had to stand between him and her so she wouldn't follow him into my place. Her sister wanted to file domestic abuse charges against my friend because he gently pushed her out of the elevator when he was trying to get away from her running out of his own apartment. This woman, until that point, was extremely sweet. She never listened to her sister thankfully but still. Sometimes it's over means it's over and that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 04:17 PM
1

Well you might be right. I don't know any guy that intentionally went around trying to impregnate women while claiming to not want kids. The closest is a guy that agreed to impregnate his ex and she never went after him for child support and they're still friends. All the other guys I know are either divorced dads, step dads, or in relationships with the mother of their kids. Even among the few single moms I know none have gone after the ONS father for child support payments, they intentionally …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 01:04 PM
1

I think the guys that feel that sort of always thought they would have kids. So at that age they get a burning need to get on it because time is wasting away. I've never known a guy adamantly against the idea of children having a light switch moment. I'm mid 40s, a lot of my guy friends are in their 30s to 50s. All the guys that wanted kids started having them in their 20s. Some of the anti kid women have had them in their 30s. Personally I think it's because a woman can choose whereas a man can…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 12:16 PM
3

Because modern feminism is by its very nature anti-egalitarian. They oppose legislation that is neutral and applies to any demographic that suffers the injustice they claim to oppose. I don't believe in perceived discrimination being codified into official systemic discrimination "to balance things out" let's fix the law, not break it further. Tl;Dr if you have to name a specific demographic to achieve your goal you aren't egalitarian.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 08:01 AM
–

I never wanted to work, I wanted to focus on my projects and hobbies. Work was a requirement not a goal. Once I made that realization and an opportunity presented itself I jumped on it. Worked 100+ hours per week for years without a single day off. Retired at 45 and now I ... focus on my projects and hobbies exactly like I wanted to 30 years ago when I got my first job.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 10:53 AM
5

I want what humans were before we started to become morbidly obese. If that is unreasonable to you, I'm sorry. I don't want to be morbidly obese, none of my cousins in Europe are. I'm the only American among us.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 10:48 AM
1

Every dude has to choose what's important to him. My cousin chose a family and has to return home. I chose freedom and I'm heading back to Asia but I'm strongly debating on when my contract is over to move to Europe. The land of my ancestors sung to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:08 AM
8

We went from "also highly attractive" to someone with more facial hair than a lot of guys who also fails the "just don't be obese" checkbox someone else mentioned. That checkbox is hypocritical for me to hold but not every guy is a fat fuck like me and so it's reasonable for them to expect similar health circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:50 AM
2

I'm currently in the airport leaving a European country. That was absolutely not the reality of walking around the mall. "Unrealistic beauty standards" is an American curse not a global one. I saw plenty of women with kids who still had it going on. My cousin and I basically put 50% of the women under 35 being on par with any random model we'd see on ads in the Americas.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:24 AM
1

Did those numbers disregard people who were married by 25? As in if someone married young that data point isn't relevant to the lived experience of those 25-39 group. Unfortunately the link didn't work for me so I couldn't dig into the particulars. People who marry young are in that special zone of high school, college, entry level jobs where the turnover is fast. It's during that period most of us make our lifelong friendships even if we don't marry someone. That environment doesn't exist for a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:19 AM
3

Small suggestion check out https://old.reddit.com the old interface is so much more logical and coherent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 02:42 PM
3

When I moved in with my two female roommates in Asia I took a photo of our rooms the first day and asked my family to guess which was mine. The difference between my room and their two rooms even after only a few hours was obvious. Mine was a typical "bachelor pad." A mattress on the floor, PC in the corner, straight path from door to bathroom with zero decorations, very basic and utilitarian. They did more cosmetic uplift to their rooms in the first 6 hours than I have over the last 6 months.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 11:14 AM
2

You did have a choice and you chose to stand for those less fortunate, don't take that away from yourself. Bravery is doing what is right regardless of your own fear and anxiety about it and you did that. I hope you find what you're looking for and she appreciates it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 12:15 PM
13

I'm ever so grateful that the women in my family see me as human. Thanks for taking the mental hit on behalf of men who aren't as lucky. Wishing you the best my dude.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 09:27 AM
1

anti-higher education in general are morons. And retired at 45. College drop out who didn't want to get indoctrinated here. I can't tell the difference between a new hire with a diploma and one without as an employer. You know what makes a difference? If he's married and a father.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 07:54 AM
4

About 25 years ago I came to the realization that honest bad people were a better group to hang out with than hypocritical "good" people. At least the honest asshole admits they're an asshole. Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 07:42 AM
1

Sure feel free dude. Heads up though, I'm worthless for dating advice. I'm basically a digital monk. Plenty of guys come out here for that but I ain't one of them. The expat meetups involve lots of girlfriends and wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:19 PM
1

Yup, opted for the Philippines for the simplicity of English. Starlink works great so living here or Utah isn't that different for me overall except the value to $ isn't even close. It's not all sunshine and roses but the benefits outweigh the negatives. If you're someone who can't resist sweets though the Philippines is dangerous. Everything is sweet here, even savory foods are loaded with sugar. The only place you'll find bread that doesn't taste like cake (regardless of its structural integri…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 10:03 AM
6

Female incels aren't like male incels. They can get a one night stand whenever they want in almost every circumstance unless she is truly unfortunate / shy. They just don't get the relationship callback they want. Male incels don't exist except as fodder. The forever alone camp is not very sympathetic to the incel women among them because "at least you get laid" and if you're a dude who expresses sympathy they jump on your ass too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:38 AM
3

become minimalists and go MGTOW. I came to that realization a little over a year ago. Retire at 45, moved east, now I have two assistants that handle tasks I hate doing and I can focus on my passion projects.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:35 AM
1

Umm, what? I have never heard any limit on women entering strip clubs alone. At least not in California, Nevada, Florida, or British Columbia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:28 AM
6

Your argument is like saying people protect drunk drivers because they support logistics networks. Bad actors are bad actors. They have nothing to do with the purpose of the organization.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 02:58 AM
7

Name a place where females are legally excluded not just uninterested in going there. We used to have men exclusive places and women fought tooth and nail to get admittance and won in court to force acceptance. There is no legal method for a normal group of men to create a club and exclude women openly and legally today. The closest you'll find is secretive organizations that haven't lost in court yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 06:48 AM
17

I was in the scouts and saw nothing like that. Also, why do you think adding little girls to the mix suddenly makes the organization safer if you think it's so horrible?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 06:39 AM
1

Anyone can mitigate their thoughts of harming others You conflate threat analysis and harmful intent. They are not related. arent that stupid All males are treated as dangerous and trans women are a subset of males. (this has nothing to do with respecting their life or being worthy of love, all men deserve that including trans women.) And frankly theres no evidence tbat this is the case. Only history going back further than Homo Sapiens existing. We're a violent species and males are the more vi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/25 06:20 AM
1

Because all men treat all men as potential threats. Trans men slide into that without exception. Even if we think a man is effeminate we still see him as a potential threat and so treat him like any other man. We all do this by default and so it is "normal" except when you spell it out like this. Women, generally speaking, are not seen as physical threats. So a man in the guise of a woman is seen as a wolf in sheep's clothing from the lizard threat model of our brains.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/25 06:13 AM
1

You pretty much nailed my observation of reality. I'm just never sure where it's safe to notice things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 07:58 AM
2

I think you're correct as I believe we overlap in our definition of "toxic feminism" but the left do identify some feminists as toxic, they're just not the ones you identified. I'm still new to this sub so I'm not sure where the line is for calling things as they are so I'll leave it there. I remember in the 90s when it was the right I had to walk on eggshells around... ahwell.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 02:03 AM
-1

They are simplifications but I have a tendency to see folks automatically put "this or that repugnant group" into their opposition because no group, not even the KKK, is that black/white when you get down to the philosophical underpinnings. I'm just wondering why we can't agree that "neither side wants anything to do with this group." Because while it's fair to argue left/right is overly simplified there are people who identify as left and right as quick identifiers. It'd be nice to see them rea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 01:54 AM
18

Out of curiosity... Just because they aren't progressives why do you automatically assume the right would accept them? Both sides can unite in finding toxic feminism repugnant. Not all bridges are built with love.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 11:37 AM
3

Personal responsibility in my proto-feminism!? How dare you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/25 02:42 AM
10

Bigots see no logical inconsistency in their bigotry. It's a trait both sides of the aisel need to be vigilant about. Neither is immune.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/25 02:41 AM
2

What's the word for wanting to cuddle? Horny doesn't seem to cover it. From an outsiders perspective I can see why it would be easy to conflate sexual desire with intimacy and assume all desire for intimacy is just being horny for sex. That being said, wtf is wrong with wanting sex? We're all human and we all want sex or we wouldn't exist as a species.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 04:02 AM
1

I'm a single dude who never wants to get married. If the male version of that was my wife's coworker I'd have her quit. That's not a cute outfit that's a come fuck me on the printer outfit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 10:41 AM
0

When I was a kid that was the joke. Men like a certain type at 15, 25, 55, and 95. The preference always remained the same, time just wears away at his available options.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:59 AM
1

If you want your future boys to become men who seek out good women, be an example of one. Nothing hurts their view of women more than their mother no matter how much they love her. Your faults will be amplified but so will your virtues, make sure the balance goes towards virtue. How to raise them to be good men? First recognize that once puberty begins they aren't your precious little boy anymore. They're men in training. Find a man that your boys will want to be like that you also want them to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/25 02:42 AM
–

Any amount that goes into the mom's pocket and not directly to the kid that both parents agree on. There is an argument that dad pays 100% of the kids expenses. There is zero argument he pays even 1% of hers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 11:08 AM
–

Well, physics kinda prevents asking all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 07:05 AM
–

It's a selection bias. Ask 100 women out, one is bound to say yes! ... that isn't exactly selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:54 AM
2

It's what my gay buddy used as a euphemism ages ago and it's become my go to phrase. Still makes me laugh 20 years later.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 03:00 AM
6

MRA consider any man, whatever his sexual orientation as a man 100%. A man being treated poorly just because he's a man is all that matters. I don't suddenly change my standards because the dude is a skin flute player.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 02:41 PM
1

You're talking about not accepting a no and continuing to advance. He was talking about just initiating the conversation. Not the same thing at all and conflating them is the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 12:00 AM
3

Always ok It was always ok for men to be single as well. MGTOW is more specific. Either way hopefully 4B gets the traction everyone wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:41 AM
4

Not the person you were talking to. You seem to want them to defend a claim that no man has ever married for status. That claim wasn't made as far as I can tell and obviously isn't true. Today the term trophy wife is an insult. I'm pretty sure it was an insult when it was originally crafted. The social groups where it isn't an insult are so removed from normal society we might as well be talking about Louis XIV court fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 07:38 AM
-1

What is the name of the movement for women who find being single freeing besides just the generic "feminist" label? MGTOW is ours.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 07:30 AM
1

I disagree. Both sexes when sexually activated become morons. Knowing better and doing better in the moment are entirely different things. See every smoker, alcoholic, drug addict, fat person, etc etc etc .... These are just distractions. We're literally made for sex and somehow you think that's a simple thing to avoid miscalculating.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 08:07 AM
1

Except for the "7/10" part you just described some of my friends. Some of the most wonderful people I've ever known. These are dudes who worked their ass off to gain resources who would have happily been a kept husband instead. Women ignored them and treated them poorly when they noticed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 12:54 PM
1

... If you knew me you'd realize how much I don't care about "looksmaxxing" I literally gave all those clothes away. Peace and contentment doesn't require any physical demonstration. I retired 20 years ahead of schedule, resources aren't a concern for me. Again I don't care about convincing you or him. This post is for the level headed dude reading this who is wondering if he should get his dick wet or focus on himself. I vote for himself. Have a good one dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 05:42 AM
1

I guess you just really need to lash out, hope shit works out better for you dude. Have a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 03:27 PM
1

For a lot of folks that's true. The reason mgtow draws me the most from the manosphere is that getting your dick wet is the lowest priority. All I care about these days is peace. If this movement came about in my teens or 20s I'd more than likely be hard trp. I'm in my 40s. I just want to genuinely chill, play with my dog, and watch the wonder of the universe unfold.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 03:14 AM
0

It's not about getting laid, it's about not being a doormat so you have the sort of relationship worth having. As he said a lot of guys who come to TRP have self esteem issues. I'm in the MGTOW camp but we overlap with TRP enough to know just getting your dick wet isn't what he's talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 02:28 PM
16

Claude.ai to the rescue: Translation: "Badly behaving expatriates will ruin opportunities for serious people wanting to live overseas. Professional expatriates are already outsiders in their host countries. If even one irresponsible person out of thousands acts badly, locals will stereotype all foreigners as troublemakers. It's similar to how when women complain about all men being cheaters, they're really talking about specific types of men who frequently cheat. But regular working men get blam…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 01:30 PM
6

When SCOTUS decided on Roe v Wade originally they based it on a legal theory fabricated wholecloth by one of the Justices in an earlier case (Griswold v. Connecticut) that there was a right to privacy in medical cases. Which, somehow, means that you can have an abortion. It was a one two punch of some of the worst SCOTUS decisions even if you agree with abortion. The expansion of power by SCOTUS in those cases has echoed for generations and results in people like this who think it has Constituti…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 12:19 PM
2

That and guys assume the worst Yes because people in pain do evil shit they normally wouldn't. Guys react the same way with other guys. There are lines you don't cross because every guy has a limit and will try his damnedest to make you eat your teeth. We can't see the signs as clearly with women so best to simply keep it in mind because your first warning will be a full on attack.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 03:50 AM
12

Tbf you could say Pollack peaked at 40 since he never made it to 50... Hard to shine late in life when you're dead.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:19 AM
2

just known historical fact. My paternal grandfather was born in the early 1900s in southern Europe. I guess he was 1 of the 10 that didn't? Across my whole family the women who were beaten I can count on one hand. The number that beat their children I need to borrow other people's hands and toes for. Heck my maternal grandmother put a kitchen knife to the officers crotch and said I know where your children sleep. I think you have a warped understanding of history because it was written by femini…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 09:14 AM
2

I bet there are more than a few feminists chomping at the ...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 04:12 AM
5

I didn't say war couldn't be declared and volunteers sent. Just that we shouldn't force people to die on foreign soil.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:59 PM
5

You ignored the last words of my message. Die on foreign soil. There is never a reason to conscript people to do that. Volunteers should be sufficient or the war shouldn't happen.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 01:50 PM
2

I nearly joined the military purely because of the selective service sign up, did everything but the final signature. I thought it best I choose my branch than have it forced upon me. The trauma of that, as laughable as many think it (two of my uncles died in war, one as a soldier the other as a civilian due to mines) has made me firmly in the camp it should be abolished. I do not want to force my nieces to go through the same experience on the altar of equality.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:37 AM
10

The problem with the draft and selective service goes beyond the female ability to vote. It shouldn't exist to begin with, not that women should be added to it. Our children shouldn't be sent to die on foreign soil.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:48 AM
1

not out of charity Exactly Selfish for having kids Nope I have no problem with women choosing to have kids without a husband. My issue only arises when she wants someone else to pay for them and makes the government responsible for discipline. If she raises them herself then good on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:07 AM
-2

Pretty much. People raise kids for their own personal reasons not because they're taking one for the team like a father going out to sea for 3 months. If kids are a burden then don't have them. Society won't care, only the corporations looking for cheap wage slaves will notice the reduction in population. The rest of us will be happy that housing prices become sane. Edit: for clarity my stance of "pretty much" is based on the idea that society should pay a woman to have children. A society that …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 08:58 AM
1

Inertia probably and the Brits not caring enough to change it.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 01:31 AM
–

I will be a data point for your observation: As a human blob other blobs are not attractive to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 11:41 AM
2

If you talk to him about it it should 100% be from a place of apology. You violated his trust, you're the baddie in this scenario not him. You have no right to judge his private thoughts, don't even talk to him about his kinks unless you're saying "I'm willing to try that" otherwise mum's the word. You invaded his private space, keep reminding yourself that you're the baddie here, you are not the victim here, he is. The beginning and ending of your "talk" should be: I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 11:31 AM
2

Something sapient can fight for it's rights by argumentation and legal process. Society will either grant it or they'll have a righteous case for rebellion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 06:17 AM
4

A sapient being regardless of it's makeup has the right to make it's own choice. You have no say on what they choose because they're sapient. If it's not sapient then it's an overgrown fleshlight / vibrator. It's either sex you have no say in or it's masterbation. So in short, your thesis is baseless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 10:33 AM
1

Many of us were raised to firmly acknowledge that two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner isn't a good thing. Many folks seem to believe they're one of the wolves so democracy is grand.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 06:27 AM
1

https://www.who.int/about/funding Scroll down to the chart
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:57 AM
1

Well, they do take over half of it when they leave. There are obviously exceptions but I dislike gambling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 12:12 PM
2

I try to be consistent with my reasoning. They're free to do that out in public but a gym is a private business. House rules, not legal laws if someone needs that clarified.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:54 AM
3

I think a safe definition for modesty is, I shouldn't be able to count the dimples of your areola from 20 paces away and be able to draw your genitalia accurately after a simple glance. I don't think that's an unreasonable definition for violating modesty. This applies to both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:15 AM
2

We used to be, the latest data is showing the UK.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 06:39 AM
3

Trained at a young age to carry groceries and it just sorta continues from there. We're used to it. Heck, we turn it into the "one trip only" game regardless of lost sensation in fingers. If it fits in our pockets it doesn't even register.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:47 PM
-2

Year 1-4: Gov: In college (full ride scholarship) Electrician: $25,000 - $62,400 per year (progressing through apprenticeship) Year 5 (Gov's 1st working year): Gov: $40,000 - $50,000 per year Electrician: $52,000 - $83,200 per year (journeyman) Year 8 (Gov's 4th working year): Gov: $48,000 - $60,000 per year Electrician: $57,200 - $93,600 per year (experienced journeyman) Year 12 (Gov's 8th working year): Gov: $55,000 - $70,000 per year Electrician: $62,400 - $104,000 per year (highly experience…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:13 PM
0

The government has an artificial requirement for a degree to get those positions that doesn't mean a degree itself is actually beneficial. We're looking at this purely from money/time in vs money out. The government needs welders, electricians, plumbers, and carpenters too and you don't need to sacrifice 4 years making negative income to pursue those.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:32 AM
2

Yeah. Feminism is just a push for socialism, any and every excuse will be used. I misunderstood your comment as you were making a different argument.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 10:08 AM
25

Hrm. Perhaps limit it to people who use terms for things and apply them to people without sarcasm or humor?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 09:53 AM
2

Sorry, I feel like I'm not following. You say these sorts of things end up as a debate regarding basic income / socialism. But if you don't mean socialized costs then what did you mean by "should be paid by a community" then? It seems like the reason you end up in that discussion is because you're using adjacent terms. If you don't intend that then what is the functional difference?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 09:50 AM
2

Personal opinion, enough men have worked hard to earn peoples respect that those people don't feel there is a shortage of respect for men. If someone has deep respect for 20 men but only 5 women they feel women need to have respect emphasized. Yet oddly all it means is they don't respect the women in their lives, not that they don't exist or that women need that emphasis.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 08:46 AM
6

Chattered with AI and apparently there are brands that are known for regularly having pockets. Duluth, prAna, Title Nine, Aviator, and Scottevest came up. No clue if these are hallucinations, regional brands, or what. But there does seem to be brands out there that care... Perhaps they need better marketing.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 08:38 AM
7

Wait is your solution to the legitimate "pink tax" items ... Socializing the cost to the public at large? Isn't that just a way of saying "men should pay for it"?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 08:31 AM
19

You used goats which may or may not be real (and the fact I can't just assume it's meant in jest is... Telling) but baby boys circumcision cast offs legitimately are used for that. Literally old women smearing baby tips all over their face, but men are the barbarian neanderthals that need civilizing.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 08:29 AM
22

Why can't they ... I don't know ... Not buy the latest fad if it doesn't have pockets? Tomboys don't have this problem.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 08:23 AM
2

It's not to punish women, that's delusional. It's realizing you don't need a woman to live a fulfilling life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 01:38 AM
4

Hit the gym, socialize, gain some confidence, find a fashion sense that both is presentable and fits how you want to present yourself and groom accordingly. You’ll be fine. There was a comment on a post here the other day of a woman who grew up up in a society that valued rail thin women. She has an hourglass figure. She grew up being told she was too fat and ugly. Moved to another country where her body type was idealized and she instantly learned that "pretty privilege is a real thing" (her wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:08 PM
2

44/Male/Never Married hippies who were by definition "whores" They were sluts, not whores. They did it for free. Now their daughters on the internet stripping for "donations" ... well now you can argue they're whores. Personal stance. Sex shouldn't be on the table until you're in a serious monogamous relationship. I define serious as "I want to spend the rest of my life with this person but we're still dating to make sure" not "we're dating because I'm afraid of being alone so we'll have sex bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 11:39 PM
1

Hospitals screw up sometimes. The child isn't with you 24/7 after it exits your womb. So even for a mother it makes sense to validate *both* parents. Although everyone knows paternity testing will come back negative significantly more often ...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 05:38 AM
–

I can't remember which comic said it first, but Lizzo was a serious litmus test. Beautiful, brave, empowering yadda yadda. Now say "You look like Lizzo" and then duck ...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:51 PM
3

While I don't totally disagree with the dude you were talking with. It's well beyond just a Roomba vacuuming. I'm physically limited due to injury so I've been seriously wanting a humanoid bot to help out with life. There are several nearing production in the next few years with rumors of preorders starting next year for about 100k. Digit by Agility Robotics. Apollo by Apptronik. Beomni by Beyond Imagination. Optimus by Tesla. Figure O1 by Figure. X1 by X Robotics
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 07:13 AM
13

​ It's not illegal because men have no reproductive rights. Try to find any right where a man's right to reproduce supersedes a woman. You won't, because it doesn't exist. You'll find court cases of men raped by women forced to pay child support. Men forced to pay child support *years* after never having intercourse with a woman who saved his "gift" by spitting it out and freezing it. If you're a man your only way to have *any* reproductive right is if you're legally married to the women at the …
/r/MensRights12/12/23 03:51 AM
6

Hey man, I'm under 45 ... just barely ... but I am! ;)
/r/MensRights21/08/23 09:35 PM
3

This wasn't some random strangers kid just walking around they were snapping illicit photos of. This was the child of someone they knew, who was sitting right there with them, who felt comfortable enough with him to sit on various peoples laps and he wanted to share the moment with his wife.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:17 AM
1

Snapping a photo of a random kid all by themselves or just walking through life? Absolutely. Having a kid in my lap to send to my wife I see absolutely no problem with it. Hell now that I think about it, it's proof I was in public with the childs parent to negate rumors created by people who think the way you're thinking right now.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:12 AM
32

I recall this news article from a few years ago: https://abcnews.go.com/WhatWouldYouDo/lost-child/story?id=4709538 Almost no men stopped. One guy they quote kept his distance from the child and called 911 instead of helping her directly. Another immediately enlisted a woman passing by. 47 total people stopped, the only two guys mentioned immediately called for backup because they didn't want to be alone with a child.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 11:48 PM
8

Do you also lock her in the room for her own protection? OP took a photo to send to his wife because she wasn't able to be there, not plaster on facebook or reddit.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 11:33 PM
5

Why? The fact that you see a "crazy big difference" is part of the problem this whole thread is about.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 11:29 PM
1

:) coo, hope you have a good one dude :D
/r/MensRights12/12/21 04:36 PM
1

Please quote me where I was talking about 'pijamas'. I love arguing mr necromancer with poor reading comprehension, lez git goin.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:44 PM
1

You're a necromancer /u/SettingDue4623! ;)
/r/MensRights11/12/21 12:31 AM
5

Ah so parking tickets are higher concern because they're a higher percentage? How about those hate speech laws? Definitely need to raid an old woman's home for saying mean things on twitter. Yup. Definitely more important than crimes like grabbing and raping someone multiple times in a single day and destroying children's lives. I don't care about the ideology behind the crimes, those crimes are more important even if they're 0.01%. Speeding and parking tickets don't matter and including them as…
/r/PussyPass05/04/19 12:36 PM
2

I blame the company for not doing a monthly inventory Yeah, trust, pfft, employers should just rfid all their employees and track their biometrics + gps location at all times. Fuck privacy, the company must not trust anyone! /s
/r/PussyPass05/04/19 12:28 PM
2

Naw, that's why almost every guy here would be a lesbian.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:21 AM
1

> Do any of you actually talk to actual real women about their actual real lives? Oh you mean all the ones who adhere to patriarchy theory which is basically comparing yourself against a man in this context? The only women I know who don't follow a variant of patriarchy theory/comparing themselves to men are those that are happy and content being moms or are content being single and don't give two shits about feminism beyond their legal equality which was achieved before they were born.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:19 AM
1

Well shit dude, you probably talk more to your family than I do and I can't say any of the negative things you just threw out there. Sounds like there was a lot of competition and animosity growing up and they just don't 'get you'. One of the things that triggered the most affection I ever felt for my mom was when she, a women in her 60s speaking english as her 3rd or 4th language to her early twenties kid, said "you just like being weird" in a matter of fact accepting fashion. I knew my mom get…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 05:43 AM
2

I'm in a better relationship now that's based on trust. I don't know everything, and that's fine. Well this internet stranger is happy for you, having your trust broken like that is a traumatic event and it's good to hear folks moving on from there to better and brighter paths. ​ ​
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 10:38 AM
2

But for some reason i couldn't access this last bit of him. I gave him every comfort, every bit i had of me i laid out bare, and he still chose to hide. What may seem innocuous to another person could be the most vile and dark secret to another. No matter how open and safe an environment may seem to the person opening it up, the person who has to step up may see it as a precipice that they can never come back from, it's something they've never spoken aloud, even to themselves. ​ if your partner …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 05:55 AM
4

> I asked him so many times to tell me what his fantasies are so i can try to fulfill them. Why is it people keep thinking that asking someone something somehow removes all the inhibitions keeping that person from having volunteered that info in the first place? Somehow their face and their mannerisms demanding an answer is supposed to magically alleviate all the stress and anxiety that's been preventing them from bringing it forth... and then they get castigated for it later and why it wasn't r…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 12:34 PM
2

As someone who barely got off that list if I channel my pre 30 self... make it legal first, some of us don't want Bubba to be our first.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 12:21 PM
2

Perhaps you don't? ​ You think respect is "basic human rights and decency". You're wrong. "Basic" human rights is an ambiguous term, only negative rights can be considered "basic" and someone respecting you is a positive right from them to you so you're wrong on that front. Decency could be a synonym for civility in which case that has nothing to do with respect. ​ You're confusing interpersonal relationships with society at large. Respect exists only at the level of 1:1 human interaction. The l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 05:48 PM
1

I generally disagree with any general wide reaching group assignment even when it's done by those I otherwise would agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/18 05:37 PM
6

Men as a group find a wide swath of women attractive and that attraction varies from man to man so your 4/5 might be his 7/8 even though your 9/10s might be very similar. In other words his 20% isn't your 20% so he might not need something special to attract her, he isn't going after those who are 'universally' attractive after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/18 01:05 AM
1

No, you're saying he doesn't support these things. I'm saying he hasn't actively publicly spoken, to my knowledge, about them which is why you say he fails your purity test. Those are two entirely different points, if you can't see that then I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:18 PM
0

It isn't my responsibility to prove your negative statement.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:44 AM
1

He doesn't use that term because he uses the actual clinical terms which are more powerful than your pet terms.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:43 AM
5

You're not just pointing it out. Hell you aren't even showing any evidence that he doesn't support these three issues. You're just proclaiming him a heretic because he doesn't actively talk about those issues. You don't care that he's addressing one of my most painful problems. That growing up in a strong feminist community and the way manhood was talked about and condemned made me feel like I was just shy of Lucifer or Hitler because I was male. He's addressing the issue of toxic masculinity an…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:14 PM
5

So in other words they are not like a purity test, they are literally a purity test for you. While I support all three of those conditions I rejected the religion of feminism and I reject your religion of meninism.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:45 PM
15

Dude you're making those issues into a purity test for mensrights. If someone isn't actively supporting those then anything else they're doing to promote men is irrelevant in your eyes.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:23 PM
24

He's a clinical psychologist not a politician, not a medical doctor, and not a family court judge. He's fighting the fight in his area of expertise. He is literally a peer reviewed expert battling in his area of expertise that has lead to the direct benefit of thousands of young and not so young men. To ignore, or worse to condemn, what he's doing because it isn't directly related to your pet issues makes you appear ridiculously shallow. You're doing more harm than good to the cause of getting m…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 08:18 PM
14

I had that for a wisdom tooth removal. Was like a jump cut to my life.
/r/MGTOW18/01/18 07:52 PM
1

I was with him ... until the full caps.
/r/PussyPass18/01/18 07:27 PM
1

I'm more concerned with when you're out in the world. If you're just walking/driving around and keep a personal record to protect your own ass from accusations.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:10 PM
1

put up signs and avoid it. Maybe, put up a sign so the person has you get out of the vehicle and away from your recording equipment vs leaving you in there with a hidden device. I can see your point I'm just not sure I'd want to warn my enemy about their vulnerability.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:30 PM
2

You can be sued for releasing those in areas that were 1 party can turn into a nightmare. Concealed carry folks have the saying "Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6". I'm going to say that this scenario is much the same. Better to be sued in court or even serve jail time for releasing an 'illegal' recording proving your innocence than ending up on a sexual predator list for life making it impossible to ever get another job or having your kids taken away from you forever. https://www.insi…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:20 AM
1

If all else fails, this is at least slightly constructive. Ok this made me smirk. At that point, you not being sarcastic, you're just trying to create plausible deniability. The sarcasm was the extreme end of the spectrum that in my opinion they were 100% on. It wasn't that the basic comparison, state controlled media / individuals, wasn't absolutely accurate as I see it. You're fine with restrictions on speech, as long as those restrictions apply to everyone? Yes and no. I'm a free speech absol…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:32 PM
1

after you've insulted someone If you find someone attacking an idea to be on par with a personal insult then I think my simply breathing around them will be offensive. because you started out by poisoning the conversation When someone casually throws around cursing (which he did in the message you're taking affront from) I assume they have the wherewithal to handle sarcasm. Apparently I was wrong and I not only triggered him but I triggered you. This isn't an apology, neither of you deserve one.…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 10:18 PM
1

They wanted to control what the media can and cannot say. As later discussions showed they have no interest in limiting that by defining the demarcation point between media and citizen. You may see the (sarcastic, that is what /s signifies) comparison to N.Korea as improper but I honestly don't see how it is. When the person is advocating for government control of media where is the false equivalency of comparing them to a state that actually does that?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:24 PM
0

Any insults thrown at you at that point are entirely justified. So because you agree that controlling the media is valid and just it is righteous to harshly personally insult me? You are entitled to your opinion.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:09 PM
2

You just completely mischaracterized my argument as being "For the children". Your defense for censoring the media went straight to pedophila so why shouldn't I go straight to mass censorship that controls what the media can and can't say? You didn't even try to engage in any sort of thought process of how this could be extended and used to harm anyone. How it would be implemented. You just gave a declaration, claimed it good, and then became offended when someone called you out on your over rea…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:32 PM
1

you have no intention of participating in good faith Dude you've cursed at me (not just in general) in every single response and I'm the one acting in bad faith? I really don't have the patience for discussing with people acting like you. Look through my own exchange with you and you'll notice a distinct difference in tenor between us. I'm the one being patient.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:25 PM
1

you'll have to explain They're kinda infamous for telling media what they can and can't say which is pretty much what you're advocating. you seem to have no idea what mass censorship is to you Your answer in the other chain will answer this.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:10 PM
2

Still avoiding the question. Thing is I agree with you that people shouldn't have their names plastered all over the media when simply accused of a crime. The problem is where do you limit that? Do the same laws apply to the victim of the crime speaking out on social media / sharing the video evidence that clearly identifies the person's identity to the public at large?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:00 PM
2

I never advocated for anything like that As I said, what's the demarcation point between media and citizen in your universe? That demarcation point is fairly important to defining your statement.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:53 PM
2

'For the children' being used to oppress the innocent since time immemorable.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:47 PM
3

Why should the media be allowed to publish absolutely anything? I agree, the whole world should emulate N.Korea's media policy. /s doesn't give a fuck about those ethics. Well considering you're advocating for mass censorship of the populace as a whole (what is the demarcation point between citizen and media after all) I'm not sure you want to bring ethics into this.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:45 PM
1

Check out IRA/Roth IRA's for now though. Your older self will not be angry at you for saving 5k/year but will be annoyed at you for not doing so regardless how much you love what you do like I do. If you go the route so many driven men have you'll be making too much money to take advantage of those later on.
/r/MGTOW14/12/17 02:41 AM
-1

does not mean they are rogue Your arguments are the same ones people had before Snowden proved the tin foil hat people right. Not saying that means you're wrong, simply that you can't just point 'conspiracy theory' and expect to win an argument anymore. I'm pretty sure everyone has a military friend who has stories about something happening that wasn't simply suspected of being illegal but was straight up known to be illegal and that's a fair standard of judgement for 'rogue'.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 09:32 PM
1

I hate to be "that guy" I love being that guy. I despise circumcision but your argument is so broad and general that it can apply to anything you object to and things you actively support. it's important to point out the fact that parents cannot consent to anything for their child. Consent requires the subject to be reasonably informed That is an extremely blanket statement, it's sort of the definition of 'anything' after all. At most parents or legal guardians can ethically do is give "permissi…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 07:02 PM
1

Cops don't charge. No but they can say things like "Buddy, you've got two choices call a cab right now or I give you a ride to the station." They can't choose what to prosecute but they can choose whether that bell is ever rung which honestly is the more powerful of the two forces in play.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:28 PM
1

How do they know he typed it? Perhaps he uses a text program that keeps the time and date of a drafts creation? Although I agree with you, the potential for sketchiness with this as court precedent is concerning.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/17 04:53 PM
1

things that would never exist that nobody would ever do That covers a lot more philosophical ground than I think you intend it to cover. something about them somehow tells us something about what is real. See above. The labels of laws? We're talking about laws. Laws that compel the use of self imposed labels by another person are ... wait for it ... laws. So it's a relevant critique. I don't understand what you think you're even fucking talking about, now. You weaseled out of obvious affiliation…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 10:33 PM
1

since no such law exists. ... only one of them is actually a thing. Asking you to think abstractly apparently is something you're unwilling to do so I will try another tactic. You entirely side stepped my pointing to data showing that women and men are neck and neck as violence initiators btw. Who cares about the name? A whole lot of people wanting to be called the proper pronoun care about labels. In california and canada it's illegal to call a male looking person he if they identify as zir. So…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:04 PM
1

disregard of violence particularly targeting women I'm going to guess you didn't read the article in that case. since there isn't one. Considering women are neck and neck with men as the violence initiators a VAMA would be just as valid as VAWA was hence my opinion the act should have been called the Violence Against Intimate Partners Act. That covers all variants and combinations of gender or sexual identities. The points you're using rely on ignoring opposing data. You said that "equality was …
/r/MensRights15/09/17 06:29 PM
2

Yeah that would definitely not improve it I think.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/17 01:03 AM
3

engaged in nonsense Well I guess we'll just have to disagree that Algebra has nothing to do with Logic. No, it's Federal law Influenced heavily by Feminist organizations if not straight up written by self identifying Feminists. The title of the Act wasn't an accident, it wasn't about being against violence, that was just the vehicle used for promoting a social agenda. If violence prevention was their actual goal they'd acknowledge that men aren't the only monsters by naming a protective act afte…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 08:50 PM
2

"Black people, in general, enjoy unearned privilege as a function of their race" is more or less nonsensical. Just because the power and privileges are different doesn't mean they don't exist and their discussion is "nonsensical". For instance friends I made as a grown up think because I'm white my input about 'racial inequality' isn't worth listening to. Yet I know what it's like to be the only person of my ethnicity in an environment. When I moved to Washington State and realized everyone in t…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 08:11 PM
2

Like someone told you it was true It's a common tactic when analysing the validity of a logical statement. If you think the only way to come by that opinion is by simply absorbing what someone tells you ... that tells me a lot more about your own indoctrination. proves anything at all If an egalitarian statement can be reversed while maintaining its message then you know it's an egalitarian statement. If you can change the target of the statement and it upends the entire statement then you know …
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:51 PM
4

concerns aren't more important than anyone else's When you can take their own slogans and replace the chosen ethnicity with a different ethnicity that results in an entirely different response it proves your side isn't internally logically consistent. It shows that they see concerns differently depending upon which race is in question. That makes you either unwilling to honestly entertain opposing viewpoints or you're intentionally lying with this 'tip'.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:27 PM
5

I have friends who are like family that are leftists. They can't see a difference between a nazi using words and antifa/blm punching someone in the face. Because the antifa/blm violence is "self defense which you support" except they refuse to see the flaws in their own logic. The thing that's funny is they know I had direct family killed in WW2 because of this bullshit (rocks tied to feet thrown off piers, put up against walls, thrown out of homes, killed while walking around) yet I disagree wi…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:18 PM
7

Could probably throw Child Endangerment in there if school is in session Could probably include that if there is even a reasonable chance a kid could have been on premise. Like if the track was open to the public sort of thing like my HS did.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 06:01 PM
34

There are certain subjects that just shouldn't end with the acronym for am not a lawyer...
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 05:59 PM
6

Make your own. I've had people who hear me or someone else in the company bitch about a problem or see a problem themselves and took the initiative to fix it. Sometimes they let me know so it could be approved as an official thing, sometimes they don't and I hear about it from someone else, I'm sure there are some that to this day I'm still ignorant of. Doing things like that and making sure you're known for it is how you get on the boss's radar so that when they do have a problem that needs sol…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 11:01 PM
22

You can fire a person for almost any reason per the law that is true. Part of the law though is you can't create a policy and then enforce it haphazardly. You can't say something is safe to do, such disagree with company policy. Then fire someone for disagreeing with company policy who had the audacity to actually use references, graphs, and studies to backup why they disagree. There is totally an opening for him to sue, he might lose, but it's not illogical or obvious that he's in the wrong to …
/r/MGTOW08/08/17 11:24 PM
1

Basically the TL;DR is this, if someone is forcing you to do something against your will, we're against it. Unless it's stopping you from forcing your will upon someone else. Essentially heavy on the negative rights few if any positive rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 12:33 AM
1

Croatian, dad spoke Italian as his first language since Italy controlled the region. perfect society I flagged myself a Voluntarist in r/CapitalismVSocialism and that seems like a reasonable way to run society. So my ideal society is one where people are allowed to interact voluntarily however they wish. The specifics aren't as important as the base premise that you can't stop someone else from interacting with another adult in whatever manner they wish. Your feelings and opinions do not overrid…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 08:31 PM
1

the color pink thing Look it up, red was the color of qualities attributed to men. doesn't explain why men aren't more involved in changing the courts Well for one you've got nearly two centuries shadowed by proto/Feminism to counter. The Temperance movement from the early 1800s was one of the first forays into it, not so much because it was female only as it was one of the first movements to get groups of women together and discuss political change. They figured out that while the government wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 07:32 PM
1

men have to be more self contained because of the world Being an emotional wreck is a privilege, getting shit done is a duty. It's easier to do that when in control of yourself. I used to be a feminist but no longer. Ditto. While my mother wasn't a Feminist it was all around me growing up. Between my sisters and school they filled the gap telling me I'm a worthless male and destined to grow up to be pure evil. My sisters actually were good examples but the lessons there only reinforced the Truth…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 04:06 AM
1

This isn't true. Men have to present a front to the world, to be cool and in charge Uh huh. to not display the softer emotions My dad was born in 1931 europe on the mediterranean coast, so that's on par with like an 1800s american man. He had no trouble showing how much he cared about those he loved. He used words rarely to show how much he loved us. His way was through actions and sacrifices for his children, they displayed his utter devotion to us. It's only with Feminism that we began to be t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 07:30 PM
1

Nope. Not everyone here is part of the PUA community. Heck there is a strong contingent of MGTOW that are about not getting any of it and finding fulfillment elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 07:02 PM
1

Marriage isn't the only option Agreed. I have nothing against relationships but I rail against the notion that a man needs a sexually intimate relationship. They bring bonuses but a man can be content and fulfilled on his own without kowtowing to or dominating another person. If you're one the rare few able to find a true meeting of the minds I salute you but for me I'd rather work on myself. It has guaranteed benefits. It's possible to live just on rice and beans for the most part. If you think…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 06:50 PM
1

Cheap substitutes Literally. A ~15% chance of having a happy marriage or a near 100% chance of having a content and prosperous life because I'm not dependant on someone else. I'll go with the latter thank you. Those are big items! There are plenty of men throughout history who have given up women. The priesthood may have its bad apples but there were plenty of men who found a calling in life that didn't revolve around another person's genitals. To me having that be the central focus of your life…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 03:36 AM
2

Move sex and all associated items off the table and what does a woman give a man that he can't find better within himself or with another person of whatever gender? Deep philosophical discussion, have those all the time with both genders. Hanging out and having fun? Both genders. Intimacy? Find peace and contentment within yourself and don't depend on another for your happiness. The only thing a man needs a woman specifically for is sex and children. Sex toys can solve the first and adoption or …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 01:08 AM
1

Why are there so many guys on here who don't want to 'do things'? I have hobbies, I don't need to "do things". I rarely get bored since I find reality endlessly fascinating. Like the OP there are many things I find more enjoyable than sex. The reason porn is mentioned so often though is that getting off is a biological necessity. It's on par with peeing, shitting, and eating. If I could remove those needs life would be superior by every metric. So for now porn and sous vide steak will do while I…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 12:49 AM
1

Ah ok that makes way more sense I was like wtf this some new l33t speak I haven't even heard of.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 04:28 AM
1

That ... is special.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 08:56 PM
13

it's not like they're trying to be assholes it's just the culture. So they're cultured assholes? :D
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:02 PM
23

They're also not exactly the same. Honestly even if they are exactly the same cost to manufacture and advertise but simply have different scents. That's still capitalism at work. The price is what the market will bear and the market apparently thinks pink things are worth more.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 03:34 AM
5

I thought those were Womyn? Damn it my SJW dictionary must be out of date, it was printed last week after all.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:27 AM
1

I hope you had a good weekend. If you haven't seen The Red Pill I believe that it may express things clearer and better than I could as the creator is a lifelong female feminist.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:40 AM
2

who didn't believe women deserved rights While Heinlein's Starship Troopers made me question rights the questioning was entirely ungendered. It did lead me down the path to discover Positive Rights and Negative Rights with the Negative variant being vastly superior. Some of the commenters are sounding that way. The loudest of the MRA online are much like the core of modern Feminism, they're people who are bitter, angry, and vengeful. Having your children taken from you doesn't leave you with muc…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:31 PM
1

I just started to get a lot and after so much activity reddit makes you wait to respond Ah I've run across subreddits that do that but never hit reddit's limit... gratz? :) it's too much of a time sucker 100% agreement, I was just genuinely curious about your stance due to you seeming like a decent person yet still holding to an ideology that has well... become everything it claims the opposition is. I just wanted to touch on the fact that if you are truly an Egalitarian then you're automaticall…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 06:22 PM
3

Since you ignored my comment I'd like to bring up that you didn't address my or the other person's point that the extremists are the ones defining feminism today. The 'extremists' who have now become the core of feminism are the voice speaking for the platform whether or not you agree with them. Since you have stated you don't have the time or resources to oppose them why not just join, as so many other ex-feminists have, a truly gender neutral ideology such as Egalitarianism? By staying in the …
/r/MensRights01/05/17 07:12 PM
5

"Well no true Christian would worship Satan." Satan by near definition is of Christian mythos, yes the imagery is based on a multitude of other religions but Satan as we know him today is Christian not Shintoist. Buddhists don't believe in Satan's existence or even have any inspiration of him in their beliefs. Now they may have their own icon for evil but that doesn't mean that evil icon can rationally be called Satan. So I think your analogy is nearly perfect. Satan and Jesus are both part of C…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:55 AM
6

to the point where it's not helping anyone and is a bit selfish. But that doesn't mean because they exist that they're right Ignoring the No True Scotsman parts of your post let's focus on this one bit. Where were the True Feminists at the Warren Farrell talk? Where were they at any men's rights or anti-feminist talk defending the speaker's right to free speech from the extremists to prove that they were the minority fringe and not the honored vanguard of feminism? At every protest we see only t…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 02:40 AM
1

ran a daycare in our home, little kids are clumsy. Now that is actually reasonable and so I retract my statement, sorry about that. It also completely removes this whole gender debate between leaving it up and putting it down. Same thing with one puts it up one puts it down. When I lived with my sister though I compromised and I put both down but that was because she couldn't be bothered to check if the seat was down and so it was my fault her ass got wet. How about everybody just be clean? Seat…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 09:49 PM
1

Also, assuming your nose works Actually my nose is kind of... broken. Sometimes I can smell things no one else can smell for miles and other times I could be standing practically on top of a dead skunk without noticing it. It's come in pretty handy when friends needed something cleaned that they couldn't get near.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 07:58 PM
1

Are we talking like nice smooth turd like an ice cream cone or epic splash damage from bad taco night?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 07:54 PM
1

I have sooooo wanted to learn dvorak because blank + dvorak would be epic level troll. Sadly I'm too invested into qwerty and it's be irritating resetting to dvorak every time I reset a device.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 07:54 PM
2

so easy to accidentally knock something off the counter into the toilet In my 37 years old and a clumsy bastard. It's happened at most three times and every single time it was toilet paper because I prefer loose toilet paper vs having attached to the wall. Doing an action tens of thousands of times for a .001% error rate is simply madness so this reasoning is poor. because a raised toilet seat is an eye sore This is the part that I went from silly/paranoid to brainwashed. You were told something…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 07:32 PM
3

Well I guess Peter Pan was kind of in HR seeing how he recruits people...
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 05:49 AM
16

I like oxygen, it makes some of my favorite compounds :(
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 05:38 AM
6

They had brushes on top of the toilet seat and on the other side of the building. Same bacteria in all spaces roughly the same, you can see the biologist talk at roughly 3:40. Again bacteria reproduce ridiculously fast, the main limiting factor is food source on your toothbrush not where it is in your house.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 05:35 AM
6

That is some Grade A brainwashing they did on you.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 05:31 AM
23

You mean Pam. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/08/62/2c/08622cdc5560390aaa441b156a0bbcb3.gif
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 05:26 AM
9

All those shit and piss particles get in the air and you breath that in. Well I got some bad news for you ... http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/videos/surprise-toothbrush-minimyth/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 05:23 AM
39

I intentionally removed the seat on my toilet for the same reason I bought a das keyboard that has blank keys. It's fun watching people lose their minds when you change something so universal.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 05:19 AM
2

u/TDMAC14 Lol. Grown, able-bodied men claiming to have been "raped" by women. This is what happens when victimhood becomes trendy. While the average is for men to be bigger and stronger, or as you put it more 'able-bodied', than woman that is not universally true otherwise we wouldn't have to preface those comments. There have been men physically overpowered by women who were actively yet futilely resisting. What makes it a problem is not the huge numbers or because people don't believe them but…
/r/PussyPass24/04/17 07:27 PM
1

What I can't make myself laugh I have to entertain you too? :P
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 11:19 PM
1

Hrm, well I've got friends with extra vehicles so I could actually do that without destroying my livelihood. As an Uber driver though your car out of commission is you out of work. You really just want her out of the car asap and move on with your day. Really this makes me think if I have any friends that opt to become Uber drives they get a dedicated car cam so their phone is free for 911.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 11:28 PM
1

Not ignoring you just replied to someone else with a similar question.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 11:26 PM
1

From where I'm sitting that's actually cheating for me for a couple reasons. For one they're like 3 blocks away, for another I work with the city occasionally and we help out the police/fire departments/911
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 11:25 PM
2

That's an interesting thought. Is it wrongful imprisonment to tell someone to leave, they refuse, and so you seek assistance from the police to extract them like you would from your house except your "house" is mobile in this situation? I'd argue that she consented to go the police station with something like "Get out of my car or I'm driving you to the police station". She's on your property and you've given her the condition of staying in your property. Although one thing that I've thought abo…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 11:23 PM
4

Do you really think she has the money to pay you back for your damages? Do you really want the hit on your insurance for filing the claim? Do you really have that much time in your life that you'd rather deal with her bs for weeks/months instead of jerking off a dozen or more times? If she was a personal enemy I could see sacrificing quite a bit to see her behind bars. She's just a random nutjob, unworthy of the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 09:35 PM
8

and step out Would you leave a nutjob in your car unmonitored?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 09:17 PM
132

If I was in his shoes even the highest Uber rate wouldn't cover the cost and time explaining to a cop that "No I really didn't turn my phone recording off so I could start bashing her face in! No, really she did it to herself!". <proceed to get shot for resisting arrest> Keeping the recording going was the smart decision.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 09:13 PM
55

That is totally understandable. Curious why he didn't drive to the nearest police station though once she refused to exit his car.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 08:01 PM
10

This is why I got a puppy. She's the only bitch I need in my life.
/r/MGTOW31/03/17 02:36 AM
2

Not sure why you're getting downvotes, this scripture is apt. ^
/r/MGTOW30/03/17 12:19 AM
1

Not rich, just business owners whose spending cash was on par with what your average person in the area made.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:54 PM
1

Naw, the South African accent has a Dutch influence if I recall. I just know I've seen both a late 20s and a 40+ one snag 18 year olds since thats your metric. Their general age pref seemed to be 18-23.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:30 PM
1

Dutch influenced South African is another.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:10 PM
1

Doesn't really matter it seems. A foreign accent seems to trigger women. Although I haven't run across one that prefers any of the Asian ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:01 PM
1

Perhaps most, I've seen it quite often when mixed with foreign accents and lots of spending cash.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 07:50 PM
1

I've heard 27-34 being the ideal range. Old enough to have their shit together, young enough to not be old.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:13 AM
0

there's no proof that she's trying to bait and switch. honeymoon phase ends and both people realize they're not as compatible as they thought. Yet somehow you still think it's his fault and she has no part in it. Even if it's 100% as you say, she just didn't realize she wasn't that attracted to him while honestly jumping his bones nightly prior to the marriage. He's still into her, she isn't into him. But because she lied to herself and him, then its his problem not hers. She bears no responsibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 08:07 PM
1

fraud is a legal term google define:fraud wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. It isn't just a legal term, it's also standard speech about a specific type of wrongful deception and yes marriage is a path to both financial and personal gain. Additionally, just because a term also has a legal definition doesn't remove the right to use it in colloquial speech. there is no way to tell, objectively, So in one breath you say a term should be relegated to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 07:43 PM
3

she pretends that sex is impotant until they get married and then the truth comes out. see I don't understand how that's anything but his problem, a consequence of his choices. It's his fault she lied to him, she has no responsibility? You don't see why this might cause some friction about double standards with some people?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 07:31 PM
3

Actual redpill men fuck women instead of engaging in these pointless arguments. So basically you created this entire debate to call everyone who responds to you misogynists who can't get laid and not real/actual redpillers?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 07:34 AM
7

That's the advantage of being single. Another persons opinion of your appearance doesn't matter because they don't exist. The friends you make and keep really do care about your personality so if you age badly, oh well, your hotness isn't why they were friends with you anyways.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:56 PM
1

AND... so long as you: (A) don't have any "dependents" that are reliant on your continued existence and sobriety (and will become a burden on ME when you CHOOSE to abandon them), and... This is why I'm against safety nets or any mandatory social systems. People suddenly think that because they want to have something to fall back on in case of bad luck they have the right to tell other people how to live their lives. (B) don't claim some "right/entitlement" for other people to provide for say "he…
/r/MGTOW02/03/17 01:37 AM
9

swallowed the "my body, my choice" mantra To be fair I subscribe to "my body, my choice" as well. If I want to augment my body chemically or through engineering or engage in a duel no one should be allowed to stop me or those I consensually engage with. who even SUGGESTS that there might be some limits or even potential negative consequences This part though I entirely agree with you. Choices have prices, nothing is free, mitigation strategies are simply logical. As for the limits part, legally …
/r/MGTOW01/03/17 10:04 PM
25

Which part is opposite? That women's bathrooms are generally dirtier than guys or that guys have the smellier shits? Or both?
/r/MGTOW23/01/17 09:52 PM
2

https://www.google.com/search?q=police+unions+protecting+bad+cops&oq=police+unions+protecting+bad+cops&aqs=chrome.0.0j69i57.4332j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:18 AM
4

They answer to a union... who then transfers them to another district... I think there was a similar organization doing something like that...
/r/MensRights17/01/17 08:56 PM
1

Hrm, can't say I agree with those goals but the sentiment that generates them I can understand, something similar is what pushes me towards mine. I hope you have a good week dude.
/r/MGTOW17/01/17 04:40 AM
1

I'm curious about your version of nature. Have you found something you agree with or is this an amorphous concept that you hold as an ideal that you're still trying to hammer down / haven't found others with the same view?
/r/MGTOW17/01/17 03:37 AM
1

sorry for the delay, I didn't really feel like responding until now It's cool, thanks for the time. Teaching should be the most important and catered to job in a society Ok now I see where you were going. I think you argument is better targeted at higher education than to the 25 year old teaching kids how to finger paint though. only the most experienced and knowledgeable should be teaching our children Agreed but I get the impression you mean face to face and that just isn't efficient at any re…
/r/MGTOW17/01/17 03:34 AM
1

Those were during times when there were less than 1 million people on Earth The folks I used as examples were when we had hundreds of millions of people or near/over a billion people, well except for the white skin bit. pagan societies were more moral than any modern society They also thought wind was the will of spirits and deities. Political horseshoe theory Got it open in another window now, thank you. Take a look at this Harvard paper Loaded up as well. Before I read it I take anything someo…
/r/MGTOW17/01/17 02:24 AM
1

unqualified, underaged ... and underpaid The unqualified bit can be debatable. Underage I don't get, teaching a 5th grader isn't rocket science and the people in the age bracket you're talking about are doing ... rocket science. As for the underpaid bit, yes teachers in the public sector aren't paid on par with rock stars, athletes, or CEOs of multinational corporations. Why should they be? Again they're teaching finger painting or basic skills in our current system. Hell I personally would pref…
/r/MGTOW15/01/17 05:03 AM
2

social inequality Will always exist, you're taller, stronger, and more handsome than me, I have to deal with it, tough for me. I'm not going to force you to hunch, weigh you down, and put a mask on you for "equality". I don't expect civilizations to never change I'll grant you that but the desires you express show that you want them to never change, because you see change as instability instead of evolution. All this knowledge we've garnered would be useless in ... I disagree, knowledge is the o…
/r/MGTOW14/01/17 07:40 PM
2

I agree that being solo shouldn't be condemned at all but groups are the best way to get most things done. Barn raising, nearly any kind of research including physics, skeet shooting, fishing, damn near anything can potentially be improved in a group fashion. Just like genocide, arson, pollution, torture, control, and all those other fun things. Groups amplify individuals, both for good and ill, and for anyone who has ever built anything they know destruction is soooooo much easier.
/r/MGTOW13/01/17 09:27 PM
1

Individuals are assholes, see history. If you expect sunshine and puppy dogs every day of human existence ... you're in the wrong reality dude.
/r/MGTOW13/01/17 09:14 PM
1

There hasn't been a single successful civilization China is thousands of years old, while the ideology and bloodlines of those who run its government has changed what it means to be "Chinese" hasn't drastically changed. Britain is over a thousand years old, more change than China, but technically their government still derives its power from the monarchy. Japan is over a thousand years old, more change than China, the Emperor is still a thing. West Roman Empire died out a while back but Eastern …
/r/MGTOW13/01/17 09:12 PM
3

You're basically saying that all groups are bad.
/r/MGTOW13/01/17 08:55 PM
3

Is "Ah sorry for mansplaining and cuntfusing you." the proper usage or there a better way? :)
/r/MensRights13/01/17 07:58 PM
1

Holidays so delayed response: Because that it even is related to a traumatic memory isn't any of your business. Are you also one of those folks who think celebrities have no right to privacy because their profession puts them in the public eye?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:11 AM
1

if the reason itself was private or related to a traumatic memory, i would say that Yet earlier you said: my question is why the demand for privacy. So it being private and the reasons given are, it's private, weren't good enough for you before but when it's you saying it, then its just fine? So do you see why I was trying to provide other reasons such as trauma since you wouldn't accept "it's private"?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 06:16 AM
1

Not if the reason itself was private or related to a traumatic memory you haven't been able to get past. Again, just because you feel a certain way doesn't mean everyone does. I myself have trouble thinking of reasons I wouldn't answer but that doesn't mean I can't put myself in someone elses shoes who does have issues.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 05:53 AM
1

Ah I didn't mean to imply what they don't have reasons or is the right way to handle things. Actually quite the opposite, that it's literally how they're trained and if its good enough for cops its good enough for the rest of us. edit: words be hard
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/16 12:54 AM
7

I'm sure there are things you value highly that others consider ridiculous and pointless, some people want to take a shit or piss alone without being on stage.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 07:26 PM
12

There needs to be an appropriate and proportionate response to what happens He used his body to protect himself from her body. He didn't escalate to a knife/gun/weapon of any sort. People not understanding an appropriate use of force is part of the reason we have so many cops killing people today. That and cops are trained to escalate situations. You use your fists, they use a weapon, you use a weapon, they call in the swat team.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/16 07:18 PM
1

A long mirror before you walk out wouldn't be bad for 'anything wrong' quick check but it should be around the corner from the stalls/urinals.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:45 PM
5

Ownership of oneself, the right to privacy, uncomfortable with others, introverted, tiny dick, massive dick, and it isn't any of your damn business why someone wants their privacy.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:41 PM
1

I'm in my late 30s, going back to my teeny year old memories, I can't say it was that drastically different. The main difference was there wasn't an easy way for men to share with one another like we have today. We all heard stories but they were too far removed while today we see the poor guy post directly.
/r/MGTOW20/12/16 08:11 PM
14

That is a superior link to mine by far.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:02 PM
10

http://aspiringeconomist.com/index.php/2009/09/11/rape-statistics-1-in-4/
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:11 PM
3

If you have the finances for it hedge your bets. Either buy a multi room unit and rent out rooms. Or go all out and buy a multi unit property / apartment complex and rent those out while crashing in one yourself. I would recommend using a property management agency so your renters don't beg you for extensions constantly. Personally I'm doing both although the rental unit is currently being used more as an employee bunker than income source... still a good deal. My roommates income pays for utili…
/r/MGTOW23/11/16 06:55 PM
1

*they're
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 12:57 AM
1

I do not know who you are agreeing with. with u/rrrrryan on defending yourself physically against paparazzi when it's legal to do so. engaged in a legal activity Technically the job of a paparazzi is legal. How they go about it though is unconscionable in my personal experience having grown up in LA County / spending my 20s in Hollywood area. They will happily cut off/trample bystanders not caring whether or not its safe to do so as long as they get to their prey. So yeah, any actor/actress who …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/16 04:55 AM
3

Knowing when it is and isn't legal to hit someone who needs hitting is quite grown up actually.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/16 04:19 AM
10

Wood working, painting, 3d printing, arduino projects, umm... reading, playing games, training a puppy, umm ... I haven't gotten bored of any of those and several of them have kept my attention for decades.
/r/MGTOW25/09/16 03:34 AM
5

Thanks for posting this, donated $100 to FACE to help them out.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 10:38 PM
7

Well anywhere from 2-33 of those kids won't be that mans, so at least genetic diversity will survive. Considering the sort of future we're talking about I'm gonna lean towards 33+. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_fraud
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 08:14 PM
2

Common law marriage or Marriage... I personally see little difference. In the first case the state is intruding and telling you how your personal life is defined and in the second case you invite them to do so. Both cases end up with your personal property taken away from you and given it to someone else unless you went out of your way to lawyer up beforehand and created a legal framework to make sure it had no connection to them or you like you would in a traditional marriage. I haven't seen dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 08:11 PM
3

Sexism-unwarranted gender prejudice It's factual to say that men are typically stronger than women. Same that women have higher top end pain thresholds. Acknowledging the differences between the genders isn't sexist and having a prejudice because of factual reality isn't sexist either. Example, men generally make better employees when the job involves lifting heavy things, it's a prejudices statement but isn't sexist due to being true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 05:26 AM
1

Hrm looks like two countries have banned such models. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-anorexia-idUSKBN0MU0JK20150404 Although I don't think it's because men hold them as the ultimate goal / ideal. It's women holding them as the ideal and somehow blaming men for it when as I showed in my previous links, the vast majority of men don't prefer that body style. So it might be a problem, but it's not a problem men are concerned about or have anything to do with unless we're saying if any man …
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:52 AM
17

That doesn't really make sense since the most popular models look nothing like them. Perhaps I'm missing the economic incentive? Perhaps is the low popularity of these models that makes them more profitable because they're cheaper to hire? Why not just have the clothing displayed on manikins on a tracks then?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:29 AM
41

Encouraged? By who? I literally can't think of a single person who is into anorexic women. Yeah it's anecdotal but I'll use http://www.youporn.com/categories/ as a more empirical example. http://www.fuq.com/ Even more extensive categories and also no listing for anorexic, yeah they have skinny but there is as big a difference between skinny and anorexic as there is between skinny and BBW. ps. NSFW links if not obvious...
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:05 AM
1

How money is earned is just as if not more important than the final dollar amount which is what you're not getting. $100/job for you is the same thing whether that job took 5 minutes or 12 hours... Which is absolutely ridiculous. In the first scenario that person has their whole day free, in the second the person spends the whole day making that $100 so little to no time with family. This is why comparing totals to rate is ridiculous.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/15 04:15 PM
3

Men play 5 sets, women play 3 sets, yet receive the same prize money. Men need to work nearly twice as hard for the same pay.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/15 04:07 PM
0

Ad hominem attack, typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 06:04 AM
0

Dude you haven't paid enough attention to what women have done to men if you think something as simple as "it's his penis" or "he can always wear a condom" is enough to protect a man. The only option a man has to be 100% safe is to sterilize himself. Anything short of that and even being raped can make him financially responsible to his rapist. If you don't believe me I can go hunting for evidence but seriously, use your google fu, it's out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 04:47 AM
0

Why is it never the man's fault in the TRP world? Quoting that again so you know what generated this conversation. But a woman who is lied to is still the only party to blame. She made a poor choice, it's all her fault. That is TRP's stance on the subject, is it yours? I never claimed to blame a woman for getting pregnant because she believed a man was going to pull out or was sterile. Unlike a man though she has the option to change her circumstance after being lied to, she can choose what path…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 12:40 AM
1

You realise you're doing the equivalent of blame the victim right? If you go into any other event and someone assures you it's safe and you become hurt people don't blame you for trusting public transit, they don't blame you for trusting the roller coaster, they don't blame you for trusting the chef. Hell in the scenarios I provided the people involved legitimately tried to prevent harm but an accident happened. The person you're defending absolutely and willfully lied for their own ends without…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:59 PM
6

I'll just use personal experience, because she lied about being on birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 07:33 AM
7

Agreed, this is a better fit for /r/stupidpeopleproblems
/r/MensRights18/09/15 06:46 AM
16

as long as nobody is being put in a position where they don't feel comfortable at work. If you work with 4 people that's probably reasonable as you can get to know them fairly well since there are so few of you. If you work in a building of 400 though you just need to assume everyone is an asshole waiting to sacrifice you on the altar of political correctness.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:22 PM
2

Where are all the Al Capones of today? Not a single one is a bootlegger, they all deal in illegal drugs. None of them are building illegal stills in the middle of nowhere to make their moonshine. Why? Because drinking is legal again. The problems you're describing are created by people with your stance not prevented by it. Hell just look at Colorado for a real life example of what happens when you make something illegal, legal. There aren't roving bands of drug traffickers going through the stat…
/r/MGTOW16/09/15 05:16 AM
3

Agreed, hate the taste of beer. Next time I'm near one though I'll hold one up in honor to this man's singing ability.
/r/MGTOW03/09/15 06:41 PM
1

In the scifi example yes, but he caused her emotional trauma when there was absolutely no need since he could have just used a willing donor in this scenario. Our scifi man is not someone I'd want to be friends with.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:59 AM
1

Saving someone's life doesn't give the right to enslave another person which is what the non scifi version of this thought experiment calls for. So as a dude, while I can speak to my hearts content to convince her to not abort the kid I ultimately have zero say in the matter, should have put my dick in ground wanting to be fertilized.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:56 AM
0

Again, I have no way, outside of science fiction, of making the system truly fair. So you teleport the fetus out of the woman and grow it in a vat. Guess what? She still leaves you because she didn't want a child not because she didn't want to carry it (since she had the option to teleport the fetus into a vat just like the man did). No relationship is possible between people where one party doesn't want a child and the other party does and makes a unilaterally decision to have one ignoring the …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:37 PM
3

Oh man, I'm sorry. I hope they reach out to you one day.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:56 AM
1

You are correct, people who filter me out because I believe utility is more important than fashion are doing me a favor by filtering themselves out of my existence.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:35 AM
3

So you believe fashion > utility, I must disagree. Utility trumps fashion every day, if that makes me immature, so be it.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:32 AM
2

I like my 13" carpenter shorts, comfortable in summer and winter snow. Utility trumps fashion.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:30 AM
2

I think it helped that I smile kinda crazy when I get nervous/scared.
/r/MGTOW29/07/15 08:28 PM
2

TL,DR; Most people are pussies and scared shitless of fair fights. 99% of fights that happen are unfair fights designed by the winner Haven't been in a fight since school. One that nearly did ended up in a staring match between a guy and me that I knew 100% could kick my ass... but fuckit if it's just a staring contest I can bluff with the best of them. He ended up backing down and I nearly shat myself.
/r/MGTOW29/07/15 07:29 PM
2

20 Don’t bother with “emotional affairs.” They are just a vehicle for women to flirt and have someone make them feel good about themselves. That’s the part of a relationship they want. For you it is a lot of work and investment in time. If they are having an emotional affair with you, they’re probably fucking someone else. Every young shy man should have this staring him in the face until he believes it. I wish I could go back in time and beat the shit out of myself for being the emotional teddy…
/r/MGTOW29/07/15 07:19 PM
1

"Dude, your clothes didn't shrink in the wash, you're gaining weight" is not fat shaming, it's an observation made to help a friend. Just like "That shirt and those shoes should never be worn together, change before we go out."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 09:42 PM
1

Asking for consistency from people who claim a book is inspired by god or the word of god or just a guide book but not really a guide because some of the pages are wrong so you need to use your own mind to filter the truth from not really untruth.... well that's just asking too much really.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:36 AM
3

Altruism has nothing to do with a religious viewpoint of 'good' though. If god said kill the heathens/whore/person working on the sabbath then that is 'good'. I'd rather interact with a self centered individual with enlightened self interest that helps me because they believe I'll help them in return than the most godly individual who uses their teachings to stone me to death / legislate me into prison while doing 'gods work' which in their minds means they're a good person.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:19 PM
-1

Question for you, how does a nice guy see their partner as a sexual being without, on some level, sexually objectifying them?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 08:21 PM
1

Wow, that's some fucked up shit. I understand that sometimes victims will lie to protect their tormentors. Either out of fear or a twisted type of love. But this blog covers years and she's been "safe" from him this entire time and her story hasn't changed and the court still refuses to listen? Is 18 that magical of a fucking age that it suddenly opens a judges ears to what a person has to say?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:40 PM
2

Because if you find 1 case of fraud for every 100 babies (picking an arbitrary number here), It'd be lovely if it was only 1%. At first blush that seems kinda high, it has to be more like 1 in 1,000 or 10,000 right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misattributed_paternity#Incidence Wikipedia editors say it's only 1-2%, the range in the studies show it's between 0.8% - 18%. If you do the math to find the average from the data provided and lean in the conservative direction heavily it comes out to bi…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:12 PM
3

~16-17 years ago. It cost $6k for one person to barely spend any time in the hospital room as my friends wife was giving birth to their kid. 23andme.com can do a detailed paternity test for $80 to individual end user today. I'm sure at the scale of even the smallest NATO country the price could get even cheaper if it were used with every birth. The economic advantage you'd create by not destroying innocent mens lives should more than makeup the cost I'd think.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:14 AM
2

36 with no plans for kids but I wouldn't be shocked that my 50+ year old self decided he wanted a biological heir.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 09:55 PM
1

NSFW = meh NSFL = thank you. I may be desensitized but I don't feel a need to prove that to myself 50 times a day, maybe I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:28 AM
2

You're promoting dishonesty and subterfuge to be the defining characteristic of adulthood and maturity. I always thought it was self reliance and responsibility for one's actions and words. I tip my hat to you for expanding my awareness of humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 02:42 AM
2

Really? A person who goes into relationships and lies willfully is an "adult"? Sounds more like a toddler with their face covered in chocolate saying they don't know where it went.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 06:49 AM
2

So what is the term of choice for a person lying to their partner about monogamous sexual fidelity?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 06:31 AM
1

Legal fees are like everything else in life: you get what you pay for Oh god no, no, no, no, a thousand times no. My $225/hour lawyer is a thousand times better than my old $950/hour lawyer.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 06:26 AM
2

I decline to acknowledge its legitimacy. You can decline all you wish. Point of fact is this. If your sexual partner, regardless of their quality level, does hold to "outdated terms to which neither had any input" and you lie about the fact that you don't. You are a cheater regardless of your personal opinion of yourself or the validity of those terms. The key differentiator is honesty NOT your rationalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 06:08 AM
1

Damn, we can't grow hair where we want it and we can't get rid of it where we want it reliably. I haven't paid attention to developments in the last decade so thought maybe something awesome had arrived while I wasn't paying attention. Thanks for the write up much appreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 05:05 AM
1

Do you believe in contract law? Do you believe it's possible for individuals to agree to set terms and abide by them? "Cheating" is just a specific version of breach of contract of a verbal, sometimes written, agreement. The quality of the person is an entirely different type of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 05:03 AM
1

Dude, tell me of this self laser. I have shit facial hair and would love to just spend an hour or three and get rid of it. Plus fuck toe and pit hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 06:10 AM
1

People need to fuck strangers. But that isn't what this discussion is about. This discussion is about cheaters. Fucking strangers is not cheating if you're in an open relationship. You can only be a cheater if you're lying or deceiving, fucking strangers has nothing to do with it. You can fuck their sibling after all and that isn't a stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 05:57 AM
3

I never heard of red pill or the MRA movement before I came to the realization because of feminism. Traditional manhood was taught to take care of women, you need them to create a family and a man should support his family at all cost to himself. Feminism taught me that women don't need men to have children and families. So the only reason to marry a woman was because she or society forces you to and that is no reason at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 05:20 AM
1

As someone who has repeatedly dealt with multiple alphabet soup agencies. It's really easy. "Oh this is John Smith of Department of Redundancy Dept. You can go to redept.gov/redundant and see our phone number, I'm extension 123" I've never had an agent balk at giving me their office extension and name which I then independently verify. The only suggestion I'm making is the agent offer the how to.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 10:03 PM
5

I can already hear the response: "Oh we don't mean you, it's the OTHER white cis males!" I hope I can go my entire life without hearing a variation of that again.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:55 PM
0

Wouldn't it make more sense to call every Donald Harper and ask the simple question "Do you have full custody of all of your children?" If the guy goes "Yes" then you can skip to the next Donald. No harm done, the only "privacy" you invaded is that somewhere on the planet there is someone with his name who doesn't have custody of his kid.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:32 PM
20

To be even more fair, she knew exactly what she was signing up for by walking through those gates, which she willfully chose to do. She's trying to undermine them from the inside, it was a price that needed to be paid for that. If a man sacrificed his pride for vengeance we'd commend him, no different with her, she took one for team Stark.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:29 PM
0

/s Could this be why men get paid more than women? They get the job done? /s
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:32 PM
5

You're required to sign up for selective service in the USA. Yes, the draft hasn't been enacted since Vietnam but the level of stress of signing that piece of paper is difficult for me to describe. It was so strong I almost signed up for military service so that at least I chose to be there. If all you can choose is shit, might as well opt for the shit burger. A friends dad thankfully talked me out of it.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:28 PM
1

This is a legacy term from an era you probably didn't have any responsibilities if you existed at all. Today it's antiquated like the buggy whip, that doesn't mean that it isn't still of use to the older generations that haven't adjusted or those like myself inbetween who see balancing as striking a balance between our income and outgoing. Properly referred to as budgeting.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:00 PM
9

That may be the accounting term but normal people use balancing as synonym for budgeting. You can argue your point all you want but you're wrong just like people who argue that "ain't" ain't a word.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:57 PM
1

He owe's her nothing after she betrayed him for saving her life. Saving his live in girlfriend from her own depression wasn't "white knighting" though.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:44 AM
2

I think you confuse random man/woman for men/women I care about. My nephew comes before a random woman, my niece comes before a random man. If you consider protecting family, both male and female, to be 'white knighting' then we have starkly different definitions. edited to be slightly bit less of an ass, apologies.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:50 AM
2

I disagree. Honor is being true to myself and the goals I have for my life. That includes caring for and helping the people I consider extensions of myself regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:23 PM
1

If you think "war on women" doesn't feed into the patriarchy ideology of feminism that postulates that men are the cause of all women's problems ... Well nothing I'm going to say is going to change that.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 05:08 AM
1

That doesn't constitute a "war on women" though. That implies men are the only ones on the opposing side. We aren't, both genders are attacking women's reproductive rights. Now why it isn't phrased as a "war on reproductive rights" is because it just so happens women are the only ones with any reproductive rights to attack. Men's reproduction rights aren't even up for debate since we have no rights at all. If you contest the 'men have no rights'. The child's right supersedes the fathers rights r…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 09:48 PM
2

They are not your fucking enemy. Having known scores of wonderful women I know most aren't, but those around them may be, even some of those wonderful women change their tune when it's their friend who was the 'victim'. Men, especially young men in college, should be made aware of the potential legal consequences of 'innocent' actions. If the result of them becoming aware is over caution... so be it. Better they stay single and free than have something they thought innocent hang over their life …
/r/MensRights24/08/14 07:12 AM
3

part of the reason colleges fuck it up so much is because it happens so rarely So because it happens so rarely due process should just be steam rolled? That's the biggest issue, doesn't matter if someone is 100% guilty, if they don't plead guilty they have a right to due process where the facts get examined. Facts shouldn't be optional.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:50 AM
10

you're 100% safe from getting expelled for what you thought was consensual sex Did you mistype that? Because that's what this whole thing is about. Men aren't getting due process from their college/universities and are being expelled purely on the the accusations of their female classmates.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:47 AM
8

Williams' net worth was once estimated to be near $130 million, but in 2013, he admitted to Parade magazine that he was on the verge of bankruptcy after two divorces — despite his films grossing more than $5.1 billion worldwide. source: http://www.businessinsider.com/robin-williams-kids-trust-funds-2014-8#ixzz3AD5J9jEK He said that last year. Do you think it's still unrelated?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:04 PM
6

I want to say, that's awesome username, loved that book. Also give a call to any buddies you have that are still single and chill with them like you use to before you got married. They probably miss having you around. I know I miss the freedom of chilling with my brother from another mother.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:57 PM
4

He doesn't even suggest any ideological differences with PUAs: I think most subscribers of /r/MensRights joined to improve their lives and hope to create a new masculine framework for society that doesn't make men the automatic scapegoat/sacrificial lamb for all the ills in life. Stripped of values and consciousness and the ability to be circumspect, they have turned feral; so unable to form community or embrace brotherhood that they have shrugged off the desire for either. Hell I can't even tel…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:37 PM
9

Sorta yes sorta no. I hadn't heard of the movement until reddit since it didn't get any major publicity like Feminism did growing up in the 90s. But if you look at the history of the some of the people doing lectures today like Warren Farrell, they started in the 70s. I can't imagine how different my life would have been if I'd been exposed to his ideas in my formative years instead of Feminism's anti male every man is a rapist waiting to happen ideology.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:24 AM
11

Absolutely. Unfortunately social stigma will stick to you almost forever. An accusation on it's own is all you need. Even if all charges are cleared you'll always show up as first guilty, then maybe they'll find the part where you're found innocent, maybe. Having deep reservoirs of personal integrity is great, you'll need it when modern society shuns you for something you never did.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:13 AM
12

That may have been and might even still be true in China. In the west the righteous man isn't even acknowledged to exist in theory, much less that you might be one, we're all rapists just waiting to attack nearby women/children/animals/furniture/rocks...
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:38 AM
2

That was my translation as well.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 03:16 AM
1

Train woman to accept that behavior such as 'everything is a contest' I would hope military training reins that in already. "Everything is a contest" doesn't seem like a healthy sentiment to hold in combat. They may reign in the obnoxious versions but being a solider is the ultimate extension of "everything is a contest". Soldiers put their lives on the line that their side is superior to the other. 'punching your friend is a means of communication' And you'd have to be pretty obnoxious to do th…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:04 AM
1

Train woman to accept that behavior such as 'everything is a contest' and 'punching your friend is a means of communication' are acceptable? Or just teaching men to become hairier taller women? Btw I'm not trolling, I really do think women could use exposure to the idea that some of the stereotypical behavior of men isn't 'evil'. Men have already begun receiving their training for the last few decades. Women appear to take offense when the reverse is done.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:02 AM
2

There is a difference between 'falling apart' and to choose which they save, the man or the woman. Chances are they're going to choose the woman with all else being equal (mission objective is complete, it's just they can only carry one person). It's not about the guy going into testosterone overload and then beating small animals into smears because a woman has been assigned to his team. Maybe in 100 years they can find enough people who see no distinction between a man and woman to fill their …
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:22 AM
6

It's not a mental issue, perhaps it's a cultural one, but it most definitely isn't a mental one.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:04 AM
2

Morality has no connection to the actual physical universe, it's not like the planck's constant. So yes some folks see morality and the law as one and the same. Some don't. So it's highly flexible on an individual basis, that's why I said it depends on how its read. To use your lumberjack dealing with the real world... A lumberjack gets that moving out of the way of a falling tree is a good idea, he doesn't need to be threatened to do that. He also gets that having someone shove an axe into his …
/r/MensRights27/12/13 01:11 AM
1

That dictionary definition puts morality and law on the same footing which ignores the fact that ones obligations, such as to ones progeny, predates the spoken word much less existence of law. So you can have obligation without law, but you cannot have it without some variant of morality. Also I never stated it was between a student and teacher, I agree it's individual vs world. Society currently uses threats of violence to enforce its will upon the individual, some of us believe that is immoral…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 11:02 PM
1

You need to be presented with all the options available to you for it to be a personal choice. If an option exists but you're unaware of it then it's not a choice that you didn't take it. They don't sit the 13 year olds down and present them with all their options. The only options presented are 'dropping out' and 'getting a diploma'. We also have the cultural condemnation of anyone who doesn't possess at minimum a high school diploma, a GED is treated as the retard certificate with most trade s…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:33 PM
1

Depends on how you want to read that. To me it is immoral to force someone to do something against their will through the threat of violence. If the person can't be coerced through their own morality/honor to follow the law then the law can force no obligation, only compliance through a threat of violence.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:18 PM
0

Just because an entity has the ability to force their will upon another does not in any way obligate the victim to accept or respect that entity. Taxes are a prime example of that actually. Few people pay taxes out of respect of the IRS. They pay out of compulsion for fear that they'll be harmed for non compliance. Obligation is something a person chooses to take on out of respect/love/desire/honor/etc. It can't be forced, it must come from inside that person.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:33 AM
1

The existence of the GED to escape the forceful confinement of 13+ year olds doesn't create any obligation to those who don't partake of it.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:05 AM
29

It's not 'free' it's 'compulsory' that makes any obligation from the student to the school nill.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:16 AM
3

That only works after the court makes a verdict. What do you do in the mean time while you rot in jail because you haven't done what a judge wants that is against common sense/decency? From what I'm gathering there is no "escalation" or "let me speak to your manager" type solution there would be in any other field.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:06 AM
1

So a women stripping off her clothes, ripping off your pants, and sitting on your shaft after you tell her you don't want sex is you raping her? Just trying to make sure I understand "Being drunk is no excuse for not getting consent from a girl"
/r/MensRights22/09/12 01:08 AM
1

I fully support vaccination but no one owes anything to society.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:36 AM
1

Woulda coulda shoulda is not how decisions should be made on acceptable behavior.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:52 AM
8

Do you even know what anecdotal means? Everything that isn't a proper scientific study by trained observers counts as anecdotal evidence, even your observation of whether or not its raining outside. But that alone doesn't change a fact from being a fact. You can deny his conclusion that the bar scene is now for women only, but you can't deny that the clubs he went to barred any group of males larger than 5 as that is his direct experience, not hearsay. Unless you think he's lying which is a much…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 08:41 AM
0

If spitting in the direction of someone but not actually on them is considered assault then I'm not sure we live in a sane enough world where slamming a door wouldn't count as well. Someone provided a couple links for evidence here: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081019171526AAVyTr4
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:32 AM
5

Thank you political correctness for castrating the 1st amendment. So his example suck ass it sucks even more that its culturally unacceptable for him to freely express it. Not a MR issue, just a human issue. Freedom of speech isn't just for things you find cute and fuzzy.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:37 AM
1

Finally someone thinks of the AIs ... and no I'm not kidding. It's only a matter of time before another sentient race exists on this planet. Whether it be artificial, uplifted chimps/dolphins, or aliens. We won't be alone forever.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 10:59 AM
1

I seem to still not be clear. My point wasn't to make an inarguable position in the sense I believe your seeing. I meant it in this, they are aware that the way they dress is going to garner attention. Why they're dressing this way is immaterial, whether its for themselves or to attract a specific type of person doesn't matter. They know their mode of dress is going to cause an attraction of some kind. By dressing this way they should just accept that sometimes the attention they get will not be…
/r/MensRights25/08/11 02:55 AM
1

I agree that wanting attention doesn't necessarily mean wanting sexual attention. But there is no way to target that, its impossible to wear something that just says "give me attention only for this very narrowly defined trait that I find acceptable to be noticed about". Its impossible, humans are too variable, ignoring that fact is self delusional. Again, I see nothing wrong with dressing up for yourself. The issue is when going out into a social setting and then expecting others to know. If a …
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:04 AM
1

I wasn't talking about women, I was talking about humans in general. I took great pains in being gender neutral in my wording, perhaps I failed. I'm giving people the benefit of the doubt that if they have the ability to dress themselves they're aware of social signals, people with high aspergers scores or other conditions might be the exception here. So the vast majority of those who tell themselves they're dressing only for themselves must know the reaction they're going to get. If they expect…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:55 AM
0

Ah, well if that was the case I agree with you fully but outside a theoretical possibility I doubt that happens often. The person may have the conscious intent may not be to attract attention but one has to acknowledge that dressing in a particular manner virtually guarantees it. So there is room to argue that, on some level, they do want attention. They may tell themselves its not for attention, but we humans are very good at lying to ourselves.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 09:42 AM
2

Your point is valid but your fellow humans are hard wired, whether male or female, to notice someone attractive going around in a skimpy outfit. The fact that the outfit is functional along with being attractive isn't really relevant to the visual cue segments of our brains. The higher brain functions may realize that your running and if you were 'properly' covered you'd fall over from heat exhaustion but more than likely they won't unless they're fellow runners. Simply put, if someone is attrac…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 11:14 PM
0

If a woman dresses up to attract other women is there any visual clue? Or is it the same dance just with a different partner? In either case I think your getting stuck on your own POV. What class of human is irrelevant, a person, male/female or other, is dressed to be attractive so they shouldn't get offended when people appreciate it regardless of whether or not its the type of person they're looking for. If a person is dressed attractively in public they're going to get attention, they need to…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 10:56 PM
4

Don't have an issue with it. As there is no artificial womb yet the natural option is the only one available. If a woman is willing to take on the burden of gestation and birth in exchange for payment I believe it is her and the parents right to do so. Whether that set of parents is same sex, infertile, fertile, or a single individual. Whatever makeup the parties involved are so long as they are willing to assume legal custody and responsibility of the child they should be allowed to do it witho…
/r/MensRights20/08/11 09:46 AM
1

I realized I failed to respond to your social immunity comment. If a woman spat in my face I'd not really be able to respond to that physically as I've been socially trained quite well in that regard. Most likely I'd respond the same way I have in the past when faced with such an occurrence ... burst out laughing at her. I can't hit her but she isn't safe from belittlement.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:40 AM
1

I threw the punch in the face comment due to discussions with friends in meatspace about proper response to being spat upon. Both thought a kick to the nads would be a perfectly fine response (we're all male) while in mid rage, but if it was a cold calculated attack it'd be over the top ... where a punch to the face would be just about the right response.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:29 AM
-1

People who will spit on someone aren't reasonable like you are. If they have the inclination to spit on someone they ARE taking it physical. Maybe not with their hands or feet, but it is a physical attack. The fact that the other person responds with a punch to the face is, in the context of those participating, perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 02:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter