~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Women do not love men. TRP science that is hard ot argue with...You're not going to convince anyone by being rude to them. | /r/ExRedPill | 02/02/18 05:01 AM |
| 1 | Guy writes his will on a cellphone cutting his ex out, just before he kills himself because of how she treated him. Judge rules in favor of his last wishes :)The article was pretty explicit that they are valid | /r/PussyPassDenied | 12/10/17 08:17 AM |
| 6 | A new ad campaign paints heart disease as a women's issue. Men die of it at about 1.5x the rate women doI actually do feel okay about this in some ways, as according to various studies, most people think that it's an issue that affects mostly men, when it affects both genders, just men slightly worse Some of the other ads I've seen have been more along the lines of 'heart disease: it's not just a men's issue', which would be a really good message; raising awareness about an ignored minority in a deadly illness This one, however, largely due to the fact that they're calling it 'go red for women', I… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/15 11:26 PM |
| 3 | Ana Kasparian admits to assaulting a 14 year-old boyAbsolutely, the bastard not only had the gall to assault a random person on the street, but to sodding turn around and come back to do it again Self-defense is totally justified in this case While I'd prefer if she'd used a non-violent method like walking away (bike-kicking could break some bones, after all), she has every right to defend herself against someone attacking her, and he's on a bike so kicking him off it is about her only option What I'm angry about is the beating, and the disgustin… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/15 03:20 PM |
| 7 | Ana Kasparian admits to assaulting a 14 year-old boyIf a woman slapped a man, and he knocked her down Not just if, Ana was absolutely disgusted by the people who defended that NFL player (Ray Rice?) who knocked out his fiance in a lift. The fiance had already punched him, and then started charging head-first at him, and he defended himself with a single punch, which knocked her over, and subsequently out. And this fucking disingenuous bint went so far as to say that her faith in humanity had been killed by the fact that some people were so sick t… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/15 03:13 PM |
| 1 | Feminist says DNA paternity tests are "anti-feminist application of science," believes men refusing to raise children they didn't father is immoral.I would say unless both parents consent to not putting his name on | /r/MensRights | 18/01/15 08:39 AM |
| 1 | Australian Feminist declares tradition marriage the same as prostitution.Women marry for money. They don't want jobs. Dude, seriously. Unless you've conducted proper testing of every living woman, what you're saying is a ridiculous, and patently false, generalisation. You're being fucking sexist, and I think it worth remembering that if some news article was published that said something like Men marry for sex. They don't love, they don't want you, all they want is your pussy, we would all find that, rightly, abhorrent. Don't be a hypocrite. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/14 01:28 PM |
| 29 | Introducing SheRides: a taxi service that discriminates against male drivers and passengers.On this note, I'm coming out with my new service: 'No Blacks in my Van'. Since Black people are more likely to be poor, and poor people are more likely to be violent, it only makes sense that some white people will be a little scared to get in a car driven by a black guy. What if he tries to rob you? Rather than tell them 'you're a fucking racist, either get in the cab or walk home, you piece of shit', I'm going to provide the necessary public service that is providing cars driven by whites, for… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/14 10:30 AM |
| 2 | The tragic loss of personal responsibility and the article which got a Forbes writer fired for discussing the sad state of modern campus lifeYou know ever since the currency change over I've just found the whole system increasingly confusing | /r/MensRights | 26/09/14 02:23 PM |
| 2 | The tragic loss of personal responsibility and the article which got a Forbes writer fired for discussing the sad state of modern campus lifepoint three is particularly crucial in this equation | /r/MensRights | 26/09/14 02:57 AM |
| 5 | The tragic loss of personal responsibility and the article which got a Forbes writer fired for discussing the sad state of modern campus lifeOn that note, I literally saw an article the other day that said the problem of rape by fraternities is only present in white, heterosexual frats, and that black frats, and queer frats, and whatever, don't do it as much and shouldn't be criticised for it Higher oppression points = rape people less often, I guess. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/14 02:52 AM |
| -1 | The tragic loss of personal responsibility and the article which got a Forbes writer fired for discussing the sad state of modern campus lifethis article was essentially saying female drunkenness is the problem. No, you cretin, this article was saying that female drunkenness is a problem. Rape also is a problem, one that is unrelated to this discussion, as this discussion is about a specific problem facing fraternities; predrinks, and the problems they cause; and people can discuss that as being an issue without having to remind everyone every 3.4 seconds that rape, also, is bad. Imagine if I came into a discussion about ISIS, and so… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/14 02:50 AM |
| 5 | The tragic loss of personal responsibility and the article which got a Forbes writer fired for discussing the sad state of modern campus lifeHow could girls predrinking be a problem for this frat, if in other scanarios, at other frats, people want girls to be drunk!? How could those two things possibly both be true? | /r/MensRights | 26/09/14 02:35 AM |
| 2 | The events happening in Qatar are a Men's Rights issue, these men are essentially enslaved. We should do something to help our brothers.I like this. I like this a lot. Unionise, brothers! | /r/MensRights | 29/07/14 03:15 PM |
| 1 | Continuing my University/city's excellent sexual violence campaign is this:Yeah, and the context of this is that they were not in a relationship, and she was well aware of his not wanting to have sex with her. Context means far more than the act itself. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/14 12:51 AM |
| 2 | Continuing my University/city's excellent sexual violence campaign is this:It doesn't say alcohol precludes consent, it says alcohol does not mean the same as consent. There's a pretty big difference. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/14 10:39 AM |
| 17 | Continuing my University/city's excellent sexual violence campaign is this:She's a predator, man. Completely sober, and taking advantage of someone's drunkenness to do things she knows would be turned down otherwise. I don't know if rape is quite the right word (I also don't know that it isn't), but what she did was closer to rape than it was to purely consensual sex. Predator is definitely the right word: she took advantage of you. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/14 10:36 AM |
| 1 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.I'm not speaking definitively about who approaches whom; I'm merely defending Revoran's comment that society traditionally says that sex is something a man does to a woman, not something they do jointly together A statement with which you actually agree, because you literally just said this I'm stating the widely accepted paradigm I don't care who approaches whom, I care that there are expectations about who that should be, and negative judgements made about those who do it differently. I have d… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/14 03:22 AM |
| 1 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.Ya got me, I just hate my body, thanks bro. I have never had this problem; I have never attempted to meet women at bars, or any other similar setting. Nothing about what I've said would lead a sane person to think that. So no, this is not some personal issue, and writing an entire 1,800 words about how you reckon my sex life is insufficient is... wow. You cunt. Anyway if you could stop with the ad hominem attacks, that would be great. Yes, we are arguing semantics. We have been since you said th… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 02:45 PM |
| 1 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.No, when I say people, I mean society. I mean the norms and expectations of our culture, as portrayed and perpetuated by most things we see on a day-to-day basis. I do not mean that I am physically unsatisfied with my body. What the fuck. Why is penetration definitionally active, again? If the actual major act of which it is merely a part is passive (i.e. the man is just lying there), you still think he is active? I think domination is more fundamentally active than insertion. Insertion can be f… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 02:22 PM |
| 2 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.I'm saying the expectation is that men approach, and women say yes or no, of course this isn't always, or even mostly, the case, but that's what people expect. Yes, their actions can be described as one person being active, and the other passive, but this is not based on their genitals, but on how they're having sex: women can totally be active, and men passive; there are submissive guys. It is possible for the man to just lie there, unmoving, while the woman does literally everything. Does she … | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 03:16 AM |
| 1 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.That's cool, I actually agree with you, and your stories are super interesting, I just think you should've made it more clear originally: there's nothing about femaleness that makes certain women behave this way, rather women are pressured to behave a certain way, or believe certain things about themselves, which lead to these situations. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 03:08 AM |
| 1 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.No, it isn't sexist to point out a double standard, but there's a difference between 'society tells women they cannot be wrong', and just 'women all think they cannot be wrong': the former is a good point, and needs to be said more often, the latter is just sexism, and also turns everyone away from the point you're trying to make. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 03:02 AM |
| 0 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.No, society's expectations are that men approach, offer sex, and then women either accept or decline. He is most definitely the agent, and she most definitely the object. Sex is a thing two people do together. No-one can have sex to someone else, you have sex with someone. You are seriously suggesting that because the man enters the woman they are not doing something together? He is only acting on her, and not only their actions, but the very nature of their actions is fundamentally different? | /r/MensRights | 25/06/14 04:31 PM |
| -7 | In case anyone here still likes Bill Maher, this happened. Bill Maher viciously mocking male rape victims.Let's not get sexist here. It sounds like you've had some pretty shitty dating experiences; mostly with women who are sexist themselves (assuming all men want is sex, rather than, say, a good date), but don't generalise that to all women, that's being just as bad as they are. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/14 04:23 PM |
| 1 | Mens rights is not a right wing (only) group. *Please read*Oh, I'm sorry, then, I thought it was one of those ones everyone throws about, if you chalked it up in a minute to explain something, that's cool, I retract my more harsh criticisms. Although ultimately those graphs can never really give an accurate depiction of politics, so I'm broadly against their use On state capitalism, I am one such socialist, and the point I'm making is that if capitalism means free markets, a capitalism with heavily restricted markets could not exist; such capitalisms cl… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/14 10:58 AM |
| 2 | Mens rights is not a right wing (only) group. *Please read*These graphs never help. Typically of them, this one is useless, and bullshit. Communism, Marxism, and (arguably) Leninism all argue for stateless, democratic societies, so should be in the bottom left corner; Communism, not as left-wing as socialism? TIL; 'social democrats' is a tough term, I wouldn't put it on the right, Lenin called himself a social democrat; Anarchism is not in between socialism and capitalism, anarchism (traditionally) is outright socialist; Nazim is to the left of Fascism?… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/14 06:05 AM |
| 6 | Is this what they mean by "Male Privilege"Actually, homo also means 'same' in Ancient Greek, which is why it's different in half our words: some of them use Greek, some use Latin | /r/MensRights | 13/06/14 05:23 AM |
| 4 | [via r/SRSsucks] Male feminist suffers cognitive dissonance after experiencing false accusationFinger nails, too. Pretty easy to cause some damage without having muscle if you're angry enough. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 12:48 PM |
| 11 | [via r/SRSsucks] Male feminist suffers cognitive dissonance after experiencing false accusationIt's really starting to be awful , but don't worry I know you have it worse I love you I'm sorry | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 12:46 PM |
| 4 | [via r/SRSsucks] Male feminist suffers cognitive dissonance after experiencing false accusationFrom the comments: It is pretty unfortunate that most discussion of "men's issues" comes from people who don't really face them and who don't really intend on having that discussion; just using it to deflect discussion of women's issues. He got us! It's all about hating women, and we actually just use male victims for our nefarious purposes! Proof? Nah don't worry about proof, I have my feels. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 12:45 PM |
| 2 | Breaking the wall of secrecy on the sexual abuse of men by womenA fair comment, and I agree, it doesn't ruin the article. It was just one point, out of many good ones, which I found disagreeable, but by no means damning of the whole article. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 10:31 AM |
| 3 | Breaking the wall of secrecy on the sexual abuse of men by womenGreat article! I did find this one line a tad off, though the rape and sexual assault of women is, by any measure, the more extensive and harmful social phenomenon and public health crisis. He says himself that they are equally prevalent crimes, like, two paragraphs up, so why does he then say that one is more extensive and harmful? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 05:29 AM |
| 3 | Judge gave male rapist light sentence, called 14-y/o female victim "in control"; suspended and censured. Great. Also, still nothing has been done about the countless times judges say this of 14-y/o male victims.Exactly! Discretion is needed, and there are some cases where it clearly isn't predatory. I've even known people who had sex at 15 or so with complete adults, did so completely of their own will, and were absolutely fine about it, because to them it was just a sexual encounter. Then there are cases where it clearly is predatory: the line is hard to draw, and it's a difficult issue. But I know one thing for sure: the line should not be drawn based on the genitals of those involved. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/14 04:20 AM |
| 5 | Apparently sexual assault doesn't happen to males.How is it so god-damned difficult to just put a neutral pronoun? Why can't you just say they, or say 'sisters, brothers, wives, and husbands'? What is stopping you? Nothing. Because recognising all victims, regardless of gender, takes no extra effort, and means the god-damned world to millions of men suffering around the world. If you really want to stop sexual assault, include all the fucking victims. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/14 02:43 PM |
| 1 | Ana Kasparian loves her female privilege, female only parking spaces.You're right: I can say black, negro, nigger, whatever I want as long as it means the same thing. It doesn't matter which word I use, it could not possibly imply bigotry! Words matter. So please clarify: what is your view? | /r/MensRights | 02/06/14 02:13 AM |
| 1 | Ana Kasparian loves her female privilege, female only parking spaces.What was he supposed to read out of that simple sentence? You literally called believing transgendered people a world view. If that's not what you meant, please feel free to clarify rather than insult. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 01:39 PM |
| 1 | Ana Kasparian loves her female privilege, female only parking spaces.It's a valid point to make; any gendering of facilities inevitably leads to major difficulties for transgendered people, but the way you worded it implies bigotry. Why not just say 'if I'm trans'? | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 01:38 PM |
| 5 | Ana Kasparian loves her female privilege, female only parking spaces.World view? Respecting people's identity is not a world view. And besides, I'm just correcting your language: there's a word for the concept to which you're referring, and it's 'transgender'. There's no harm in using it. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 05:18 AM |
| -2 | Ana Kasparian loves her female privilege, female only parking spaces.If I am transgender, can I park there? FTFY | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 04:59 AM |
| 4 | Ana Kasparian loves her female privilege, female only parking spaces.You're right, it's certainly insulting to women, and not to men. But while it isn't degrading, it is unfair on men to deny them access to certain facilities based on some deluded special treatment for the other sex. So I'd say it's all around pretty shitty for everyone. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 04:58 AM |
| 9 | Ana Kasparian loves her female privilege, female only parking spaces.But the worst thing is that they think this is sexist to women. Looks to me like it's pretty sexist towards everyone involved. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 01:21 AM |
| 1 | Guys, are you afraid of walking alone at night?Absolutely! It's scary walking down empty streets in the dark. We've all done the 'keys in the fist' thing they're talking about on #YesAllWomen. Also it's worth mentioning that the number one indicator of being a victim of that sort of violence is being a young male: if someone is walking alone in the street, they are less likely to be assaulted in that situation if they are a woman than if they are a man. So their gender-based fear is not even close to rational. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 01:20 AM |
| 5 | Apparently, satirical criticisms of the danger of broad generalizations is not allowed on Twitter.'misquoting others' What? He literally just quoted her word for word! | /r/MensRights | 31/05/14 08:43 AM |
| 20 | MRA's sure do talk about the Friend Zone a lot.It really pisses me off: these people will happily call out any homophobia directed at lesbians as misogyny, but would never refer to the exact same thing directed at gay guys as misandry; that's just homophobia. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 11:59 PM |
| 1 | Common sense from Advice Animals.Be polite. I don't have a problem understanding anything; if that's what happened, fine. Clearly, if there is irrefutable evidence showing that she was acted upon by an unconscious man, it is more likely that I missed that section, than willingly chose to ignore it and blunder uselessly into an argument I cannot win, as no such section was actually mentioned in the linked article which we have been discussing. Please point me to the section in which she describes it, rather than uselessly insult… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/14 03:56 PM |
| 1 | Common sense from Advice Animals.It was done against his will. He was unconscious. And what on earth are you saying? This has nothing to do with the point in time at which the act took place. Burning someone alive for apostasy is still immoral, even if it happened in 1500 when that was considered to be fine. I don't know why you keep mentioning it. Also I'm pretty sure rape was still illegal in the '80s. And also it wasn't considered to be socially acceptable, either, so what are you saying? She was not purely passive: he was u… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/14 11:01 AM |
| 1 | Common sense from Advice Animals.Did he call her over? Then yeah, I agree. Not rape, and shouldn't be criminal; but morally you should probably not at that point | /r/MensRights | 22/05/14 10:45 AM |
| 1 | Common sense from Advice Animals.Firstly, calm down. 'You will do...' No. If you have a point you wish me to explain, fine, but I will not be ordered about. You seriously think he was conscious? She specifically describes him being unable to move his body, unable to stand up to change the CD, and falling asleep every 3 seconds. Now, "Is it still considered getting head if the guy falls asleep every three seconds and moves his tongue like an elderly person eating their last oatmeal? ... I sigh, I hear my own heartbreak, I fight … | /r/MensRights | 21/05/14 01:24 PM |
| 1 | Common sense from Advice Animals.... What. "Your logic, from there, is that anyone who doesn't resist a drunken rape is a rapist." How? I said nothing of the sort. In fact I don't think you even read my reply, what on earth was that drivel? I don't know what you're talking about, because no mention of a change of topic was made, but I am talking about the situation described in the linked article. The one in which she was 100% sober and having sex with an unconscious person. No-one was crying, or screaming, and the rapist was n… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/14 12:46 PM |
| 2 | Common sense from Advice Animals.I didn't claim that. I didn't even imply that, jesus. You just said that because she is a sexual assault victim, she is not guilty of sexual assault in a completely different, unrelated situation. How is that justifiable? | /r/MensRights | 21/05/14 12:09 PM |
| 5 | Common sense from Advice Animals.Eh, I think she probably should have stopped, if he was falling asleep. If he's unconscious, or really very nearly unconscious, he really can't consent. In this case she was sober, and he was about to pass out, and quite possibly unable to comprehend what was happening. A reasonable case could be made that he couldn't consent, or at least that she should have steered clear of the situation. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/14 11:17 AM |
| 2 | Common sense from Advice Animals.To be clear I don't think this was necessarily rape; I think some more info is needed about his level of consciousness when the sexual encounter began. If two people are having sex, and one of them falls asleep during the act, that doesn't necessarily render the other a rapist. But it is certainly troubling that he fell asleep due to drunkenness, as this can imply a lack of consciousness from the beginning. That said. A sober person, having sex with a frequently unconscious person. Are you serio… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/14 11:15 AM |
| 1 | High School with spike in sexual misconduct claims called Predator High, 4/5 of accused are women; some ask why the students aren't punished.So often do they say it's victim blaming when someone says 'rape is hideous and it's not your fault, also if you dress down you might be safer' This is someone literally saying 'I think we should blame the victims too'. Where are the feminists? Surely they should be furious? I'm furious, because I actually care about rape victims, regardless of gender. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/14 04:51 PM |
| 14 | Is this real?Can you stop fucking sexually assaulting him right now, you piece of shit? | /r/MensRights | 17/05/14 01:29 PM |
| 14 | Is this real?You want to put up a sign reminding passengers not to be creepy? Fine. Weird, and unnecessary (I've literally never in my entire life seen a single person just strike up conversation or stare creepily on public transport), but fine; hardly the end of the world. Just don't say it only applies to women! How sodding difficult is that to understand? 'Don't creep people out! Staring or masturbating might make some people feel uncomfortable!' That's all you need. You don't need to make it gendered, so… | /r/MensRights | 17/05/14 01:28 PM |
| 3 | Gangbang in Brussel's school. 5 boys expelled. The consenting nymphomaniac can stay. (French)Fist bump! | /r/MensRights | 04/05/14 10:15 AM |
| 4 | Gangbang in Brussel's school. 5 boys expelled. The consenting nymphomaniac can stay. (French)Deepest apologies! I shouldn't have assumed they were the same | /r/MensRights | 04/05/14 07:29 AM |
| 3 | Gangbang in Brussel's school. 5 boys expelled. The consenting nymphomaniac can stay. (French)So a 16 year-old girl has sex with some guys, and tries to rape another one, and THE BOYS GET EXPELLED!? Unbelievable. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/14 07:02 AM |
| 3 | Gangbang in Brussel's school. 5 boys expelled. The consenting nymphomaniac can stay. (French)Actually, quatrieme means 4th year away from final year, so the boys would be 14, and she is 16. Source: was in quatrieme | /r/MensRights | 04/05/14 07:01 AM |
| 3 | Is the Men's Rights Movement like the feminists claim it is?Well most Marxists (or at least the ones I know) believe in free speech, equal rights, etc. In fact the Trotskyist group I'm in actually disagrees with the modern feminist movement, in that they agree that women aren't yet equal in general, but disagree with feminism's argument that men as a 'class' are responsible (which sounds like filthy, evil MRA talk, to me). We even ran a meeting on 'privilege theory', and why it's bullshit /r/communism101 guys are a bunch of stalinist shits who sounded li… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/14 01:15 PM |
| 2 | Is the Men's Rights Movement like the feminists claim it is?I don't remember the first one, but the second was r/communism101. And speaking as a communist, fuck those guys | /r/MensRights | 27/04/14 10:39 AM |
| 6 | Is the Men's Rights Movement like the feminists claim it is?Spot on with the last bit there. I've been banned from two subreddits because they checked my history and saw that I had posted here. I hadn't brought up men's issues, or feminism, or gender, or anything, they just saw that I came here and banned me. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/14 11:15 AM |
| 2 | Researching for an essay with my university's library database. 1,349 on women, but 'men' apparently isn't a relevant subcategory for journals on sexual assault.Wait we discussed that, I don't think it's discrimination, I just had to put a flair there, and that was the closest And I didn't stretch the numbers, I just quoted the biggest source we have on the issue. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/14 12:26 AM |
| 2 | Researching for an essay with my university's library database. 1,349 on women, but 'men' apparently isn't a relevant subcategory for journals on sexual assault.That's actually a common misconception. The major American study on the matter (And I know Australia shows similar trends), found here, says each year 5.6% of women, and 5.3% of men are victims of sexual violence. Overall women are more commonly victims (but only 1:2 ratio), but the numbers year-on-year are the same, which suggests either a growing number of female rapists, or a growing number of men willing to discuss it. Also there's this: https://1in6.org/the-1-in-6-statistic/ But regardless,… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/14 06:00 PM |
| 4 | Researching for an essay with my university's library database. 1,349 on women, but 'men' apparently isn't a relevant subcategory for journals on sexual assault.But they're not, the victimisation rates are actually much closer than people realise. And regardless, there are many studies in there relating to male victims, they just never bothered to give them a category, presumably because of the common belief that only women can be, or are, raped. The studies have been done, so they should be listed there as a type. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/14 05:31 PM |
| 3 | Researching for an essay with my university's library database. 1,349 on women, but 'men' apparently isn't a relevant subcategory for journals on sexual assault.Because it says 'PUT A FLAIR OR YOUR POST WILL BE DELETED' So I picked the closest. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/14 05:11 PM |
| 6 | What do you think about the Republican stance on birth control for women in the National Health care plan?It's medicine; it isn't only for sex, but also for a number of medical issues women can have. Limiting access to birth control is abhorrent, and everyone should have access to it when they need it. Also, why on earth would we want to make it difficult to acquire, but only for poor people? Surely people who do not have enough money to afford birth control are not the ideal people to be bringing children into the world just yet. If they have the foresight to know that they couldn't raise a child, … | /r/MensRights | 24/04/14 06:17 AM |
| 6 | Australia: Complained about a sexist govt website. email response - they took it down!I forgot once. You can imagine how difficult it was explaining that to the National All Men Everywhere Association | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 03:54 PM |
| 1 | Bear Grylls creates show to 'examine modern masculinity'. Needs more women, say feminists.The fact that you don't want to deviate from that role is irrelevant. If it works for you, great, do your thing. It doesn't work for me, I don't fit the role, and it's thoroughly bigoted of you to imply that I am somehow less of a man, or that I fit less into my gender, because of that, which is what you are doing when you say that all men should fit the gender role. Let people be who they want to be, and fuck anyone who tries to say that someone else has to behave a certain way because of their… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 02:21 PM |
| 1 | Bear Grylls creates show to 'examine modern masculinity'. Needs more women, say feminists.The funny thing is, it actually is quite sexist. It's enforcing gender roles by implying that men aren't real men if they can't survive alone in the wild, which is ridiculous, and insulting to those men who are perfectly happy surviving in the world in which they live, which is not a deserted island. That isn't against their masculinity, there is no such thing. Way to miss an actual example of sexism, in favour of making one up so that they can look like the victim. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 03:41 AM |
| 13 | Great anti-circumcision image from Intact Houston, via Just SmithPut the word 'female' in front of the word 'circumcision', and see if you like that. Then take the word 'female' away, and see if you can find any moral difference between the two. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 09:16 AM |
| 4 | Saw this on my fb Newsfeed- My friend gets it!It's not a serious threat: no-one should be praising Vishnu every time they leave the house without getting falsely accused. The problem is the teaching that it doesn't happen, or that 10% is insignificant. It isn't insignificant; and it can be a hideous thing to happen to someone. If everyone acknowledged it as a bad thing, that does happen, and can be serious, and no-one treated rape as one of those 'so disgusting that the accused must be guilty' sort of crimes, it wouldn't be a problem. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/14 01:23 AM |
| 10 | Saw this on my fb Newsfeed- My friend gets it!Someone can revoke their consent at any time If they taught that in sex ed I would a-okay | /r/MensRights | 30/03/14 01:18 AM |
| 8 | Feminist: 'Men, know your place!'Take this entire article, and replace the word 'men' with 'blacks', and the word 'women' with 'white people', and see if they think that's an okay thing to think. We can’t even hold Reclaim the Night marches without blacks demanding to be included ... the inclusion of blacks means that many white people don’t feel safe attending. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/14 11:29 PM |
| 2 | Men: Violence and alcohol. Women: How are we causing them to offend? My university's neutral look at gender in crime.You crafty swine, you | /r/MensRights | 20/03/14 11:18 PM |
| 26 | Men: Violence and alcohol. Women: How are we causing them to offend? My university's neutral look at gender in crime.You must be psychic. The subset of lectures that women's crime is featured in is the same as child crime; whereas men's crime shares the subset of the lectures on gang violence, drug use, and armed robbery. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/14 03:29 PM |
| 32 | Men: Violence and alcohol. Women: How are we causing them to offend? My university's neutral look at gender in crime.Exactly, I'd love if we had a section on gender differences in crime, and the possible causes. That would actually be really interesting. What I do not love is having basically that, but looking at the men as 'why are they so evil for', and the women as 'how exactly did society force these poor victims to offend?', which it looks like it may be. As it stands men are in a different subset of lectures, with women being in the subset 'are we addressing or creating deviancy through law?', along with… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/14 03:18 PM |
| 2 | 79 stupid I need feminism picturesLove the Zimmerman thrown in there at number 23 | /r/MensRights | 20/03/14 11:02 AM |
| 5 | Moderator at /r/offmychest calls someone a dick after banning them for calling someone a cunt. Also sexism doesnt exist against men evidently.This literally filled me with so much rage that I stopped half-way through and just stared in fury at the screen. Where is it I want to go downvote it. "Cunt means weak, which is womanly, but dick doesn't mean womanly it means manly so obviously that's not a direct equivalent, because being manly means stubborn and rude, so men shouldn't get upset about that." If you have a bad word for womanly, and a bad word for manly, they ARE direct equivalents. Also cunt does not mean womanly. I've only eve… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/14 03:04 PM |
| 1 | If gender roles were reversed in ParisI got banned from their subreddit for posting this: "No men have ever been subjected to sexual violence, so it's a good thing they can finally understand thanks to this video." Thank god they only ban people who are overtly anti-women, though | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 03:21 AM |
| 9 | Did you know? This is the logo of the number 1 French dating website. On it, women are called "clients", men called "products", and only women are able to send the first message in a conversation'Adopt a guy.com' Top job! Good thing men are never objectified. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/14 04:11 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter