TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

travman064 Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by travman064 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In my idea of this concept, the Trump Jr. case would not be under protection of this law as it is a matter of government and thus a matter of every citizen of the United States. As determined by who? The GOP certainly doesn't see it that way. I think it's fair to say that they would deem it 'not a matter of importance.' Same for any other case against a public official or someone working on behalf of the people if the crime in question is related to government. Why does someone lose their rights…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:52 AM
1

Looking at the United States right now, I feel like these sort of ideas would be used quite effectively by the administration in power to silence the media. Like, reporting that people sent emails to Russians, naming names in articles, this would all be banned until someone was found guilty, right? What about reporting on something like Harvey Weinstein? It seems to me that while this law would be great to protect the accused, it would also serve to even further shelter to elite in a system that…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:39 AM
1

Wait, you are not allowed to talk about a case, when a child is involved? Are you sure? That sounds fucking ridiculous. Of course you can talk about the case. You just can't talk about anything that would reasonably lead people to the child's identity, AND if anyone (including a non-reporter) releases that info, they are committing a crime. You're saying that they can't name names, but that the information is available. With children, they can't name names and they can't name any identifying tra…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:34 PM
-1

Limiting the media from releasing names doesn't mean those names aren't available. Just that you have to obtain them of your own initiative. Then this isn't at all comparable to the protections put in place for minors, because having that information available that can be sought out is explicitly illegal. You think plastering somebodies mugshot, name, and where they are from during a trial and before guilt is established on the 5 o'clock news is not a problem? It definitely is a problem, but now…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:07 PM
1

You should also get around that by using higher instances in the justice system or you could still go to the press, because this doesn't have anything to do with the trial itself. This goes entirely against what people are saying though. Sure, if you want to say that everything should be the same and just to have a publication ban on names that's completely different than what was proposed, which was to have the same sort of system as is done with children. I guess we're just talking past each o…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:54 PM
-1

Works fine in here in Germany and other parts of Europe (for the most part)... I'm a bit concerned about the 'for the most part', but don't really know a lot about Germany. Germany has a name publication ban on people who are arrested but facing trial? Yeah, because you completely missed the point here. You completely misrepresent what is being suggested and argue against your made up scenario instead. The point is that the names don't get published, not to make it illegal to talk about it in an…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:39 PM
-2

If we’re comparing it to kids, we’d have the same set of rules and repercussions for everyone. You don’t have a separate, stricter set of rules for different people. If you write a blogpost or post a YouTube video you are just as much of a reporter as someone on television or a columnist. What avenue do you go down to pursue justice if your spouse is arrested and you believe your spouse is being denied their right to due process?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:21 PM
3

Child cases are different in that their parents or their legal guardians or the state are directly involved in the case and advocating for the child and have the ability to enforce the child’s rights. If you had this with adults, you’d have a system where a 20 year old could be arrested and the police don’t have to say anything to the family, and if the family has a problem with it there is nothing they can do because it would literally be illegal to make public statements about their kid being …
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:12 PM
1

Keeping the name a secret is effectively the same thing as keeping the trial a secret. It is impossible to keep the name secret and guarantee public oversight, because anything related to the trial can be hidden behind the guise of protecting the anonymity of the accused. I think I made that point fairly well. If you disagree I’d love to hear why, instead of insulting me for disagreeing with you.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:06 PM
–

You’re arrested. Your family goes to the police station. The police unfortunately cannot confirm or deny that you’re in a cell, as it is very important to protect your anonymity. Your family asks if you’ve hired a lawyer/contacted counsel as per your rights. The police unfortunately cannot confirm or deny. You ask when the trial will be. The police cannot confirm or deny if there will be a trial. Your wife goes to talk to a reporter about the fact that she believes you were arrested. Your wife i…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:26 PM
–

Because we’d need to apply it universally. Society decides that minors need extra protections and we wipe their records clean when they become adults. We have extensive systems in place to protect them when they are accused. But the reality is that being accused of any crime will likely shatter your public view. So if we extend this anonymity to those accused of sexual assault, we must also extend it to everyone accused of any crime. This would then effectively remove all public oversight of the…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:19 PM
–

Imagine you made a sub for people to post stories or videos of black people abusing minority privilege and getting clap-backed for it. I'm pretty sure things would get pretty damn racist pretty damn quickly. PPD didn't suddenly become shit. Look at the top posts of all time and there are posts of this calibre from more than a year ago. Look at how it just so happened that people who are interested in moderating the sub called Pussypass turned out to be alt-right sympathisers? Who would have thou…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/17 01:11 AM
–

I know countless thousands of Jews were rounded up and murded and I understand the Jewish persecution and the intentions of NatSoc Germany. Then why would you ask for proof that Hitler sentenced millions to death? But what I'm interested in is solely the gassings. Why is that? Why are you solely interested in the gassings when you were originally questioning whether or not Hitler officially ordered the execution of millions? It seems like you know and accept what actually happened, but you're ar…
/r/PussyPass23/04/17 06:03 AM
–

If you want proof that they actually sentenced the Jews to death, the Germans were actually very 'by-the-book' about recording everything. You might want to look into the Wannsee Conference where discussion focused on "the total solution of the Jewish question" and methodology was painstakingly documented. The line of logic was that discrimination against the Jews was legal in Germany, and the Wannsee Conference was essentially a discussion on how to execute all of the Jews legally based on curr…
/r/PussyPass22/04/17 10:00 PM
1

No problem. I do apologise for misinterpreting your statement though. I don't want to come off accusing you of being sexist because I do fundamentally agree with what you're saying.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:46 AM
1

Also found the article wikipedia was citing There are observable differences in the attributes of men and women that account for most of the wage gap. Statistical analysis that includes those variables has produced results that collectively account for between 65.1 and 76.4 percent of a raw gender wage gap of 20.4 percent, and thereby leave an adjusted gender wage gap that is between 4.8 and 7.1 percent https://web.archive.org/web/20131008051216/http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wag…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:40 AM
1

Can you cite to the adjusted pay gap your referring to? The wikipedia page you link to mentions it three times but doesn't actually cite any sources(That I saw) I've found a ton of data. Probably the simplest one would be http://www.payscale.com/data-packages/gender-pay-gap But by far the most interesting which looked at many different EU countries was http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_pay_gap_statistics#By_working_profile_.28part-time_versus_full-time.29 Where y…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:33 AM
1

The link you posted took me to the top of the wikipedia page for Gender Wage Gap so I didn't look further because I couldn't be sure exactly what on that page you were referring to. But you're actually wrong, the pay gap that is commonly referred to is not about men and women in the same job working the same hours. The gap is the median income of all men and women. There is no evidence that men and women with the same experience doing the same work get paid differently, that's against the law. C…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:42 AM
0

I linked to the pay gap, which attempts to account for all external factors. I agree that the commonly cited wage gap doesn't account for all of the pushes and pulls of society. But the pay gap quite literally shows that women don't get equal pay for equal work. How is that not discrimination? There already IS a gap between parents and non-parents and single people and married couples. But if a single person was doing the same job, working the same hours, and had the same experience as the paren…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:01 AM
6

I mean, aren't we all products of our environment? If you believe that women are making decisions to embark upon different careers purely because of differences in biology, then that would be true equality. But, do you really think that? Isn't it perhaps something we should perceive as an issue of our society that women are 'choosing' to enter the different lower paying fields? I mean, I truly believe that someone would make the exact same statement you just made in every single decade in the la…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:26 AM
1

Can't attack the argument so you attack the sources? If you're interested in the primary sources, the wikipedia article is in fact well-cited.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/17 02:20 PM
1

From this very thread... Did you really jump into a thread to respond to me without reading the thread? Who would do that?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/17 02:39 AM
1

Maybe I should have used different language for the sake of the discussion, but I do stand by it. He holds beliefs that are not consistent with reality. And by reality, I mean quantifiable data. Statements like 'men and women are advertised to equally with regards to body image.' If you believe that, your beliefs aren't based here on earth. If you believe that society doesn't care about obesity or body image, again, I don't know which reality you're making that statement from, but it surely isn'…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/17 01:40 AM
1

Take an objective look at advertising in general. Lots of the men on there are tall, sexy, fit, six to eight pack abs, 6' or above, etc. We are advertised these things as attractive. You ever see many short guys in advertisements? I'm going to disagree. With reference to media, women are generally younger than their male counterparts. quick google shows this to be the case. The harsh reality is that if you tune into a news show or a sports broadcast, the women are more likely to be young and goo…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 07:24 PM
1

There are plenty of men that complain all day about stuff and don't get anything done. Body image issues may not be one of those things directly, but if you see a man complaining about how no women like to talk to him, he most likely is some neckbeard with body image problems. Like I said. Body dysmorphia is a real problem among men, but rarely gets talked about among larger social contexts, while there are people who don't have a real issue that complain to feel validated. You also conveniently…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 06:06 PM
1

Is that why you really think people focus on Amy Schumer's body when they make fun of her on reddit? If Amy Schumer was a man making stupid dick and fart jokes and stealing jokes, he'd be vilified on reddit as well. Except, you wouldn't hear 'lol land whale' when people joked about him.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 05:50 PM
2

Yes, but all the anorexia and models being super skinny it wasn't impose by men, it all comes from women magazines like vanity and stuff. Okay, where do you think women's magazines like vanity and stuff comes from. Where do you think the culture for all of that comes from? Just women? We are all a product of our society. It seems kind of weird to think that one part exists independently of another part.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 05:39 PM
-1

Men are advertised to with just as such severity (we just don't notice it/ don't incorporate it into our lives). So what you're saying is that women are just more fragile? Because if men are advertised to with just as much severity, as a collective we absolutely do not exhibit anywhere near the levels of insecurity and negatives that come with them. We as a collective also tend to be more savage towards each other when hanging out and we tend to be more honest. If my friend is gaining weight Ill…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 03:28 PM
2

Sure, people don't want eating-disorder-skinny, but the pressures exerted by society lead to eating disorders. From my point of view, this is a problem that everyone needs to acknowledge and work towards fixing, because I think that everyone contributes to it. I feel like your point of view is that this is a problem that is created and perpetuated by women alone.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 03:18 PM
3

Women are more likely to develop eating disorders, but the standards they're trying to meet are set by other women. I don't really agree with that. I think that culture/society as a whole sets standards for both sexes, and that influence comes from everyone. Overtly, yes a lot of pressures come from other women. But societal pressure takes other forms, and those opinions don't exist in a vacuum. Blaming only women for women's problems is just as silly as blaming only men for women's problems.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 02:51 PM
0

I'm not saying she's disliked because she's overweight. I'm pointing out that her weight is a lightning rod for insults whereas it simply wouldn't be the case if she was a man. Carlos Mencia won't get called a land whale. He's vilified for the same stuff Schumer is, but you won't see posts make it to the reddit front page about Mencia's physical appearance. It's absolutely something worth acknowledging.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 02:45 PM
–

I agree with you that saying 'an individual man cannot experience it with the severity that women do' is just blatantly wrong. I'm sure there are males who experience extreme hate and insecurities because of their weight. But when you take the leap to 'the opposite is true' then you're just being ridiculous. Women are vastly more likely to develop an eating disorder or have self-esteem issues centred around their body image. It's a fact that women as a collective feel a much more intense pressur…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 01:43 PM
1

It's no more fucked up than the way it is now. Not really imho. And she still has the option of putting the kid up for adoption. Then it would still be the state paying for it because shit tons of kids would be in orphanages. Better to pay for her to raise the kid than pack them into orphanages like sardines. I don't however agree with you that it is OK to indenture a bunch of guys who made the mistake of sleeping with the wrong girl at the wrong time on said girls whim just because it's the eas…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 07:02 AM
2

The thing is, if two people have sex and the woman gets pregnant, she is now obligated to get an abortion if she can't reasonably afford to raise a child, and that's fucked up. This whole, 'you're only the father if you want to be' only works for society if you're willing to provide 100% of the support needed for a child. That means paying for all of the medical bills, paying for the mother to not be working for a decent chunk of time, government funded daycare, etc. etc. Otherwise that kid is g…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 06:34 AM
0

http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=46474 This is where it's from. I originally thought it was referencing distinctly higher female abortion rates in countries such as China, but it turns out it is in fact an American campaign. They claim in the video that there is gender-selection discrimination in America. Seems like a move from anti-abortion groups to appeal to pro-abortion females.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:15 AM
5

this is a grade 3-5 program (age 8-10). I seriously doubt any of the bullets you covered are available in this after-school club.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:03 AM
–

People see it as discrimination, just not negative discrimination. If we're talking about post-secondary education, of course there are situations of negative discrimination, but in OP's case, complaining about boys being discriminated from an after-school science club is ludicrous. With younger kids there is a distinct polarization between boys and girls. The vast majority of boys are going to associate primarily with other boys, and the vast majority of girls are going to associate primarily w…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter