trenthany Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	'First Wives' club upset that permanent alimony is overturned in Florida. I’m america only? That was literally a global phenomenon in the early 20th century and earlier	/r/MensRights	20/08/23 11:46 AM
3	Dating women as a woman has made me more sympathetic to the dating woes of men. Not saying you need to. And maybe your cases are different I was just asking if they’re similar to some of the other stories and the one I shared. The examples of perfectly solvable problems and not solving them could get exhausting and might account for it. Or it may not. You may have just dated a bunch of men that are incapable or refuse to offer any emotional support because they’re shit. And if so I am so sorry you went through that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/22 02:41 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over Never said it was my problem just unrealistic. I used get messages ranging from 2-4 and I’m happy with that kind of performance. I’m just pointing out it is a problem because many women will be left disappointed by those standards and it sets unreasonable standards for their future dates IRL unless they really get lucky. From what I’ve heard from women still in OLD it truly doesn’t work out 99% of the time when they get the “dream guy” because he’s fake or an asshole. There’s a reason a 4+ onlin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 11:44 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over So you’re admitting that women’s perception in OLD is unbalanced?	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 11:28 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over Yet the mens numbers show no elasticity because men rated fairly if anything the elasticity is on the womens scale as they appear to refuse to settle for less than a 4. They’re so compressed it’s insane. If you can’t pull a 4-5 IRL what makes you think it’ll work in OLD? Filters? Lol	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 09:13 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over No elasticity doesn’t account for no shift vs drastic shift. Eliminate 50% of the women and you still have the same number men found attractive in the first place. But men didn’t bias at all despite knowing slim odds and were fair in their judgements. Does that counter even remotely to women’s reactions at all? Elasticity would account for some variation in the two but 1:80 ≠ elasticity.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 08:56 PM
2	Would you take a bcp for men if it was on the market ? Tbf they did ask for opinions. Not strictly from fertile men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 08:43 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over So you’re saying the scarcity has ZERO effect yet the surplus does. Interesting argument there. Because looking at the mens chart it has zero bias towards attractiveness. Shouldn’t there still be a shift? people will only go so low before they would rather be by themselves. Yet they’re still on the app just like the women and they have as severe of a scarcity as the women do a surplus yet their ratings are balanced and natural. From my perspective looking at the study from a math angle it appear…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 08:28 PM
1	If a man isn't interested in exclusivity/monogamy, how is he supposed to not get labelled a "jerk"? The flaw I see bras has is that he only is honest once it’s brought up. I’ve been involved in plot and swinging both for years and upfront honesty keeps Brad from being labeled a jerk.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 08:10 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over So you’re saying that a sampling of women asked to review photos just adjusted it all downward. That there was no natural bell curve because of the surplus in men. Then according to your theory the male judgement graph should have an opposing bias towards attractiveness because of scarcity driving demand yet it doesn’t. It follows a natural distribution.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 08:06 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over Read the graphs. 80% of men are below a 3. That’s unattractive. Explain how the gender ratio effects that please because you aren’t making the point at all.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 08:02 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over You’re saying that male attractiveness is not a bell curve IRL. That 80% of men are unattractive. I get what you’re saying quite clearly. The average on a 1-5 scale should be a 3 the majority should be between 2-4 with roughly 50/50 either side of the line defending in quantity towards 1 and 5 where it will taper out. That’s a bell curve of averages on a 1-5 scale. But women in the study you keep quoting keep saying 80% are below a 3. That doesn’t work statistically unless men are becoming less …	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 07:56 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over So you’re claiming that the bottom 1/3 right about where the graph dives is what’s filtered and that’s why the number is skewed? So you’re saying almost 80% of the men in dating apps are unattractive and never shown to anyone. Because those 80% are actually ugly. But considering there should be a bell curve of attractiveness the same as the male to female graph you just made the point that women are unreasonably picky in OLD absolutely perfectly.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 07:29 PM
1	if you're single but dont want to be, why? r/beetlejuicing perfection!	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 07:25 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over Then why are so many marked as undesirable? You’re forgetting the study is looking at women interested in men. So out of available men, that outnumber them 10:1, that you’re claiming undesirables are filtered from, there still exists a ratio like that. Ummmm you’re sure you’re arguing your point not mine?	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 07:22 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over If women see men you’re going to see a range of men. And while top 10% are going to be less common from what I’ve read so is bottom 10% so that means the bell curve should still be fairly standard. Yet it’s not. It’s skewed way towards unattractive. The number of men just makes it more likely to be accurate. If it wasn’t tinder I’d say it was the profile text but tinder is visual 95% soooo. My point still stands.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 07:16 PM
2	Average=invisible In OLD but not necessarily IRL. These are the same graphs just in bar form.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 07:13 PM
4	Average=invisible That’s aiming to high and they’re ignoring the invisible women that are seeing them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 04:39 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over The 80:20 ratio means realistically they consider attractive what averages out to 8+ across most women that’s what the graphs show.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 04:34 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over I think an individuals tastes are wider spread amongst all women is what they’re saying. All men can rate that woman a 5 and that one a 10 isn’t the point the point is that men can be attracted to a 5 as well as a 10. Does that make sense? And per the study women are attracted to 8+ almost exclusively but will message with 5+ but I think the content of the message could be relevant rather than the amount unless the study references only I total messages which I have not managed to confirm. In th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 04:20 PM
1	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over I haven’t read it but a question did the messages include responses, or only reach out messages? Because if you take responses that say things like fuckoff out of womens responses and ones that say things like wanna fuck out of mens do the numbers change? Just curious I’ll go read it now that I’m seeing discussion on it. Edit: TLDR at bottom. I went and looked. It’s interesting, the female to male message graphs are compelling but the point that almost no one meets those standards means that alm…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 02:51 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over That argument doesn’t stand up if she swipes right on 1 in 20 men. If she found 10 in 20 reasonably attractive she’d swipe right to learn more. This actually goes against your argument that women look at more. When women have almost no information their standards are so high as to skew statistics.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 02:48 PM
1	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over I’m almost positive they’re saying on one wants to be the person they lowered their standards down for and settled for but the phrasing is stupid.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 02:30 PM
1	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over We all die alone. Well except natural disasters, plane crashes, and some auto crashes things like that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 02:27 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over You aren’t seeing all the young men and women at home. I people watch at work and talk to a lot of people who are in hospitality and you see the same few hundred faces at the same bars/restaurants etc over and over again. New faces come and go they’re mostly transient vacationers, business travel let’s, and the occasional person trying to find a spot. I like numbers so let’s play with some. If there’s 50 bars/restaurants with 500 young regulars each that’s around 25k in my area there’s approx 10…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 02:24 PM
0	CMV: Women are more shallow than men by virtue of having a much higher looks threshold and placing more emphasis on things men have no control over Well considering the American Heart Association invalidated a third of all US truckers by lowering their level of blood pressure standards to 130/80 from 140/90 which invalidated 1/3 of all US CDL drivers in 2017 leading to our current shortage of truckers and supply line problems maybe we need to reconsider what is healthy and where the lines of health lie. I mean if your idea of healthy is so narrow that only 12% of the population can fit in it is it the population that’s unhealthy or the stan…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 02:11 PM
1	The word incel has become meaningless, and is used as a knee-jerk response any time a woman doesn’t like something a man says Fair it’s been a long time since I’ve heard it. But I’m not very social. I work read work sleep mostly. 30 minutes a day on social. Lol	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 01:12 PM
1	The word incel has become meaningless, and is used as a knee-jerk response any time a woman doesn’t like something a man says I’m glad this guy either got banned or deleted because his theories on gay men are so asinine as to be some of the dumbest tales I’ve ever heard.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 04:06 AM
1	The word incel has become meaningless, and is used as a knee-jerk response any time a woman doesn’t like something a man says All of that I can agree with except that in my observations of way too much of the internet people do throw it around lightly. Maybe you and your friends don’t but people do a lot. I haven’t been painted by the brush myself yet, but by commenting in this thread who knows. Lol.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 04:02 AM
1	The word incel has become meaningless, and is used as a knee-jerk response any time a woman doesn’t like something a man says No one under 30 or so you mean? Because I remember the origin of that! Roflmao. Not that I say it but I remember it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 04:00 AM
7	Dating women as a woman has made me more sympathetic to the dating woes of men. Could they be like the men above that are burned out in some situations? I find talking to men that most analyze the hell out of their emotions and try to understand every aspect. Does it come as ingrained as with women typically? No but just like all women don’t have peak EQ from infancy nor do most men lack it. I do find many men have trouble expressing it and most treat it as a problem exactly as described above. A WTF moment. She shows she’s sad, he tried to comfort her. She says don’t touch…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/06/22 02:09 AM