TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

trexalicious Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by trexalicious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The reason I responded dismissively to your comment is that the standard you are talking about is so far beyond any requirement I can find including the marine corps. 40 pull-ups is off their scale (3 pull-ups being acceptable, beyond 20, you get no extra credit), as is 15 min for 3 miles (28 min is acceptable for a young guy). If you can figure out some way to get 80% of men to your level, you are really onto something. Not being sarcastic, do you have a youtube channel?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 06:52 AM
1

OK you want me to acknowledge for some reason, that when it comes to medium distance running and pull-ups, trained men are, on average better than the woman on the street. I can do that.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 02:25 AM
2

That is a very high bar, far beyond green beret/army ranger standard. To say that 100% of women would fail doesn't say much because 99.99% of men would fail too. In your hypothetical occupation where this level of physicality is required, the difficulty of finding people would compel one to give consideration to any freak who came forward to attempt the test, whatever their identification, man, woman, beast or machine.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:15 AM
1

Are you talking about the famous airborne insemination squadron of the pink berets?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 09:34 AM
8

That the difference in average physical strength of men and women is used as a rationale for disqualifying all women from these occupations. An alternative is to accept anyone in who can meet the required standard.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:53 PM
3

That seems to be an interesting concept also applicable to the ongoing argument about the physical strength of female police/soldiers.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:42 PM
1

Well those college-age male feminists sound like they have the zeal of the newly converted. There is a lot of that going around in all communities. On the other hand I don't see what would be objectionable to mention that it is possible to be a creep and that there are maybe 1% of people (male and female) who don't get boundaries very well and are offended when people try to assert them.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:41 AM
2

Are you saying that the bill posters believe that they are unusual men in that they are not creeps?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:59 AM
1

How could there be such a thing when women are well known to sport not thighs but a giant triangle-shaped hip/knee assemblage? </s>
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:13 AM
0

"Aww that widdle puppy gummed me on the hand." That attitude animates a lot the fascination for women who transgress the 'weaker sex' role.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:57 PM
0

Just imagine your tax/insurance dollars going to mens causes and some mirror woman is paying for the pill. Happy?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 12:40 PM
1

Men have that genetic susceptibility to monomania. That helps in chess, video games, sports trivia, and chronic wanking.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 12:30 PM
1

If you're having sex with someone and have not arrived at a robust consensus about the predictable consequences (whatever they may be, disease or conception), don't expect that their mental model of you matches the real you. People who don't have conversations pretty much deserve strife.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 11:10 AM
2

Had the experience of breaking a bone in my foot at rugby practice (age 12), practice finished, coach (in my instance male) went home without helping in any way and I had to hobble up-campus (that damned chapel hill) to phone my mum for medevac. That teacher ended up absconding with a bunch of equipment from the technical drawing department, so not a fully-functioning moral sense. Even so, it wasn't obvious that a bone was broken. Same as when I broke my radius. Somehow the school nurse couldn't…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:18 AM
1

Being unhelpful around the house entails: more time/energy needs to be expended by the person the housework falls to, with the concomitant reduction of energy for other activities resentment against the housework-shy which is not arousing That's uncontroversial to me. The friends' advice is telling her to make the link from shirking to reduced arousal explicit. Personally, I don't find that particularly offensive. Better to be told than to have to work it out empirically over the course of 20 ye…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:17 AM
1

Did you have a pre-marriage conversation about what sex is and what masturbation means?
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:05 AM
1

A person who has been in multiple relationships is more likely to understand if a particular relationship has broken down or is not living up to what a healthy relationship can be. Which is to say that there is probably a divorce deficit of miserably married (and feeling stuck) doormats who don't know any better.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 02:51 AM
1

haha, yes I did say it escapes me, and still does. To be accurate, isn't the march against the routine bastardisation of women who exercise their right?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 02:23 AM
1

I'm from Sydney, male, and fully behind women feeling as free to express their sexuality as men are encouraged to be. Why any red-blooded hetero male would discourage that completely escapes me.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:14 PM
0

Gee whiz, I think I found the last natural population of "feminist myth[s]" on this very page! Sadly they are dying out due to repellent grumpiness.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter