TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

treylot Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by treylot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What I am saying is anyone could call you an asshole, it doesn't mean that you are, but knowing for certain that you are one on the inside is pretty conclusive.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:14 AM
1

Others thinking you're an asshole and you knowing you're one is very different.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 11:39 PM
8

It's not something to be proud of. It only makes you that much more of an asshole for not wanting to change something you know to be wrong.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:43 AM
15

I'm sorry, but gender equality issues like selective service, genital mutilation, leniency on females that commit crimes as compared to their male counterparts and the invisibility of male abuse victims are as relevant to gay men as they are to straight ones. To be honest, radical feminism can be pretty alienating to anyone who doesn't have a vagina. From what I see, feminism has become one of the most lgbt-unfriendly human rights movements in modern times. Most apparent of all is the level of t…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:25 PM
9

I don't get this. Why is it that men become 'empowered bystanders who can confront their abusive peers' when women don't? I had no idea calling the authorities or talking to the abuser is a masculine thing now. Either that or this PSA's writer has a really low view of a woman's abilities.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:10 AM
7

Funny you should compare her to Duke Nukem, cause that game was a load of crap for the incredibly long amount of time it spent in development.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:29 PM
3

She only needs to play one to make one video. It was pretty much what she was doing on her youtube channel before she started this 'project'.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:25 PM
2

There's something I've never understood about marriage. I'm assuming that most people marry for love. If two people truly loved each other, why do they need a certificate and rings to validate their relationship and ensure they stay together? I get that there are financial incentives to getting married, but as a commitment-phobic, the idea of being with one person you might eventually stop loving and being unable to leave them doesn't seem very appealing.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:43 AM
10

I have to disagree with you so much on this. First off, if a boy doesn't play with a doll, it doesn't mean he doesn't show a nurturing side nor have one. Since when did the post say or suggest this? The post merely says that playing with a doll brings out the boy's nurturing side. It doesn't say that he lacks one without it. Saying that it does is the same as saying that without video games, people wouldn't have or show a violent side when in actuality, people experience violent thoughts with or…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:51 AM
12

Number 6 is called having empathy and being a decent human being.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:24 AM
4

Such a waste of life over a procedure that people aren't even sure is worth doing. Surely the cosmetic and health advantages aren't worth the irreversibly painful thing you just did to a newborn.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:56 AM
3

And most victims of violence are male too. Your point being?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:48 AM
1

Abused disproportionately where? Only in the Middle East and in developing countries. In western society however (and most parts of the world actually), victims of violent crimes are mostly men. Even the smallest suggestion of not supporting the feminist movement gets you labelled as a misogynist pig here. Like dylankf has said above, making such a day International and only for women, instead of being localized in certain areas or for both sexes, sends the wrong message that most victims of vio…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:46 AM
2

I don't understand why this is being downvoted. That men are more disposable or their lives are deemed to have less value is a truth in our society that many conveniently overlook. One example of this is war hostages. Women and children are always prioritized for rescue / release through ransom even if all the hostages are non-combatants and civilians.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:40 AM
5

It all comes down to how you define power. As Warren Farrell says, power is the ability to decide how you wish to live. Women have a lot more of this. Not just a bit, but a whole lot. Most definitely. A woman will never be judged for wanting to be a stay at home mom dependent on her breadwinner husband. Should the opposite happen however (stay at home dad), society instantly sees you as less.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:33 AM
3

I like how in all media (be it television or film) I've seen, there's never been a single one that featured the woman being unfulfilling in bed, while there have been dozens about the man being so, whether because of lack of stamina or lack of experience or whatever. Just a little observation.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:34 PM
12

Modern feminism is all about giving women all the benefits of being a man while not taking away any of the benefits of being a woman. For all the empowering their movement does, nobody would ever see a woman as less simply because she wanted to be a stay-at-home mom with a breadwinner husband or refused to sign up for the draft. Have a man who wants to do these things however and he'll be told to 'man up'. Personally, I really dislike how the feminist movement has changed from being gender equal…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:30 PM
7

I don't think unrealistic body expectations is something limited to women alone.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:25 PM
3

I don't feel like it shows male disposability, more like how society can so easily move on from one war to the next. To that person in the photo, I doubt it would've mattered if the people buried there were male or female.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:17 PM
4

Since when has Yahoo Answers been adverse to drama? You get all sorts of celebrity drama questions on it.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:02 AM
4

I'm confused by the reasoning from Sarah H, though I do agree with most of her points. How is feminism considered a minority any more? I'm sure most women (and a whole lot of guys) believe and subscribe to it. Actually, I'm pretty sure that the reason it's considered wrong to criticize it is because it is the view of the majority and thus 'politically correct'.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:00 AM
5

It doesn't make their actions (domestic abuse) any more valid. Just an observation.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:42 AM
2

I think someone here has stated before that women aren't accustomed to gauging the strength of people they attack because force is not as prevalent amongst females as it is amongst males. Like how fathers would beat their sons, but not their daughters. Or how schoolyard bullies would beat up boys, but not girls.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 02:56 AM
2

Personally, I do feel that a subreddit lacking downvote button disabled can be justified, like in lgbt subreddits that would be buried in downvotes and trolls otherwise. However, with feminists being the politically correct majority, disabling downvote buttons are totally unjustified and counter productive in feminism subreddits.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:40 AM
-4

Following your line of thought, why not have all toilets be for both genders? In fact, we should eliminate urinals because that's one thing women can't use. Why don't we make all clothes unisexual? Because it's not socially acceptable for a man to wear a skirt, so why should women? And men should wear bras too, because our breasts are all the same, right? /s I only meant that gender differences do exist, but certainly not to the point that you make it out to be where women could be "othered" by …
/r/MensRights13/10/12 01:46 PM
-6

Personally, I feel like exceptions should exist (because gender differences do exist; an example of this would be the difference between a man going topless and a woman doing the same) but your analogy is valid. If the genders had been reversed and some guy thought it would be funny to shove a pen up a girl's arse, literally everybody would be on the girl's side instead of debating whether or not it was a humiliating and malicious act.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:46 PM
12

As a person who is not very knowledgeable about the law, I'm curious. What if a woman rapes a man in such a place, what happens when he goes to the police about it? Is it ignored because it doesn't fit under the law in that area's definition of rape or is the crime classified as something else?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:42 PM
10

This is exactly why I think modern feminism is working against gender equality rather than towards it. So many of them subscribe to the idea that only women can be victims, only men can be perpetrators, and nothing else exists outside their black and white world view. If you're a man, you can't be raped. If you have been, you just have to suck it up and deal with it. Why? Because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:37 PM
1

"Some animals are more equal than others." This is pretty much the feminist mindset right now...
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:24 AM
5

I don't understand why he feels so threatened. Men's rights is NOT about taking away rights from women or weakening them. Men's rights is about empowering men and raising awareness on the other side of gender inequality that feminism so conveniently ignores. I wish people would understand that like many other human rights movements, like lgbt rights or feminism, it isn't about weakening the majority (in this case, supporters of feminism), it's about putting everyone on equal ground. Frankly, I'm…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:44 AM
6

IMO, the fact that women think of themselves as such victims that men becoming women just to dominate/spy/sexually assault them in locker rooms becomes a plausible thing in their minds shows the modern feminist movement is setting women back rather than empowering them. The fact that they're so exclusive towards a trans-woman is disgusting to me. They might as well be excluding lesbians too if they feared anyone having the slightest sexual thought about women in their locker rooms.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:58 AM
23

The amount of people that buy into the assumption that all trans people are rapists/sexual predators both scares and disgusts me. Trans people identify as their new gender, what difference does it make that they used to be male or female? This only makes me wonder what they think about lesbians, some of whom surely exist amongst them now, sharing their locker rooms.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:52 AM
1

"I see it as a form of child abuse. Being gay is not an illness, so what are they fixing?" - Timothy J Eustace, an assemblyman seeking to have ex-gay therapy for minors be outlawed in New Jersey. Circumcising is nowhere near as serious as ex-gay therapy, but why fix what's not even broken in the first place?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:00 PM
8

I like how it's okay to inflict pain on babies, but not okay to inflict pain on fully grown men. /s
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:11 PM
9

First of all, a majority of men in the world are not circumcised. Its prevalence in america is only amongst certain ethnicities (white males) or if your religion demands it (judaism for example). Source. Circumcised penises are actually the minority in any western country but the USA. If at least half the men in the world are uncircumcised, how can you call circumcision 'fixing' a newborn's dick? Secondly, what looks good is subjective and really should not be a reason to conduct surgery on a ne…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:55 AM
12

We don't blame the germans of today for the crimes of the nazis, do we? I can see many similarities between feminists (mostly the extremist ones) and my old chinese grandpa, who to this day would never buy a japanese product because of his grudge against them, even though imperial Japan and present-day Japan are very different things. I'm not saying men having more authority is a thing of the past, cause it isn't yet in many parts of the world (middle-east, asia). But I find it hard to believe t…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:59 AM
8

There is nobody who sees women as weaker than feminists themselves. I really don't see how 'empowering' they are supposed to be, when they are so selective in their movement towards 'gender equality'. It is totally okay for women to be exempt from military draft, or for them to seek alimony, but not okay at all for them to be under-represented in business corporations?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:22 AM
14

Those are all generalizations which really do not help our cause. Not all women are gold digging sluts and not all feminists want to castrate men as those phrases imply. And after all, would you rather have a pointless hour of insults or insightful discussion?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:16 AM
4

The /s wasn't there at the time of posting. Hence the quote.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:39 AM
30

Exactly. In our modern day society, it's totally okay to have programmes only for women, but when you attempt to do the opposite, you are a sexist. A way to go around this would be to simply have one programme for both genders which educates them both on all issues (false rape accusations, teenage pregnancy and gender inequality in general).
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:04 AM
2

I'm thinking it's because they think only men can perpetrate sexual assault, so they don't want to end up teaching 'possible rapists' how to rape better. They're completely ignoring the fact that women can initiate rape too. So it is okay for a man to be raped, but not okay for a woman to be. What utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:02 AM
3

Women are weaker than men. They can't attack a man by surprise and actually hurt him. They can only hurt men who attack them by surprise. Obviously being attacked when you're not ready for it gives you a huge advantage. What. This doesn't even make sense with ultra-feminist logic.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:59 AM
1

But we all know men aren't people, right? Only women and children are people. /s
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:45 AM
2

I'm really not sure why the show's so popular. It seems so average (often times less than average) to me.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:10 PM
2

I'm not against feminists, I just support gender equality. I understand the need for a feminist movement, it has solved many issues faced by women, but I am not okay with how hypocritical they are. They can play the victim card as much as they want, but nobody else can so much as suggest that a woman might be inferior to a man in some ways (the opposite is totally acceptable though, as we've seen all over the frontpage of this subreddit lately). How can they even talk about 'empowering' women wh…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:58 AM
7

I'm looking forward to the day when male rape and false rape accusations are taken seriously. Right now, the fact that so many even deny its existence with all sorts of ridiculous claims like men enjoy all sex regardless of type or that if a man gets hard he must be enjoying it is just a sign of increasing gender equality that so many would gladly ignore.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:22 AM
24

It's okay to call someone a man whore or a womanizer, but when you call someone a slut, you've crossed a line. /s
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:43 PM
53

Personally, this makes me wonder. Is feminism even about gender equality anymore? Lately to me, it's starting to seem as though nobody is victimizing women more than feminists themselves, all while they continue trying to 'empower' women. When will they realize that feminism has run its course in modern day society and that women and men have never been closer in terms of equality?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:40 PM
36

Because modern feminism's greatest weapon today is painting yourself as the helpless victim.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:56 PM
5

Exactly. If she was able to capture him as a sex slave, she would've easily been able to hand him over to the proper authorities. Still, I doubt she'd face any charges whatsoever because (a) So many people still deny the existence of female-on-male rape and (b) He did try to rob her house.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:37 AM
22

You can get hard from just about anything, including nothing at all. Is it really any wonder that direct stimulation would get a guy hard?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:34 AM
23

Regardless of the evidence, what I do not get is how some people believe that this was actually a good decision. As has been stated far too many times in the comments of the original post, this incident took place in Turkey, not extremist Afghanistan. The woman's life was not at stake from any honour killings because of losing her virginity, this was not a life or death decision. It was one made in impulse. Reporting the incident, while embarrassing, would put the man through a trial while savin…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:12 PM
0

because the premise of feminism today is that all people are equal, but some are more equal than others...
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:19 AM
6

There are ways to stop prison rape without completely eradicating a prisoner's privacy. After all, people do have needs. Having guards be on hand when a prisoner calls for help or have them be more active at responding to a reports of rape would be one solution. Also, the example you state IS rape. I think Steelcrossx was talking about gay/lesbian people (or just people who don't mind) in prisons.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 03:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter