TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

trgwarn22 Archive

View 7 posts and 84 comments by trgwarn22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-8

blue-piller here. So, I thought the LMR was going to be totally rape-y. I'm 100% bluepill here and the consent-related advice under LMR is fantastic and has no issues. It is great. I'm really proud of men for advancing to this level. You should know that according to feminist theory consent has to not only be "yes" but also "enthusiastic". This means she must answer yes to "You want me to fuck you don't you?" enthusiastically. It is also important that you are not coercing her. (For example, it …
/r/TheRedPill16/11/17 11:37 PM
2

or maybe the extra consent you get (secretly on camera) is appreciated, as is the extra confirmation by text afterward that they had a good time :) as well as screen captures of text messages from every girl I sleep with about what a great time they had keep up God's work, son ;)
/r/TheRedPill10/11/17 04:24 AM
1

I have an encrypted folder on my computer where I keep all the video and audio recordings as well as screen captures of text messages from every girl I sleep with about what a great time they had. I also keep screen captures of the conversations that led up to us having sex so they cannot pretend they entered into the situation blindly. So have you ever had to use one?
/r/TheRedPill10/11/17 12:46 AM
1

But you do cause a measurable change in the world. When someone says "nobody answered our job ad. just some sloot." (meaning slut) you answer something feminist and end up counteracting that misogyny, hiring that person if they're qualified, and suddenly you've freed a slave of the patriarchy. This isn't a hypothetical! This happens every single day in many industries.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 07:37 AM
1

I read what you linked carefully. I can't really agree with it. They write, Whereas you, dear moderate feminists...well...your battles have been won. But it's simply not true across the spectrum. There are cases of clear discrimination. And that's just the thing...when your movement has won, well, there's no point in having a movement anymore. When you win the game, you pack up and go home. Your movement ceases to exist. Your identity as a member of that movement ceases to exist. Poof. Gone. Bye…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 07:31 PM
1

1. so... reddit feminists are crazy Well, I'd prefer to say that reddit's feminists aren't feminists (in the sense of advancing egalitarianism) and hurt the (correct) feminist movement that everyone should (ought to) adopt: Reddit's 'feminists' make the world a worse place for women and fail the standard of feminism, as well as failing their own goals and failing to uphold the standards they have set. They're just not feminists, nor do they follow their own rules. 2. cherry picking the least hor…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 05:32 PM
2

So I'm 100% a blue piller and a feminist: I think red pillers are wrong in their overarching philosophy (note that I mean GENERAL philosophy), views of women as independent agents, and that they advocate many things that should never be done by anyone. (And in other cases which are illegal and immoral.) Many attitudes if adopted would make the world a worse place. However, women as independent creative and professional agents contributing to society as adults are NOT the same women who respond t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 02:16 AM
1

Great, so if we're actually on the same page about the facts, we actually won't be arguing much I think. It's basically a moral question. Think hard about whether you belong to any classes of people that someone might use as a shortcut. Are you slightly shorter than average? Are your teeth not as straight as average? Is your name more common / less common? Do you have any socioeconomic indicators - for example, are your parents divorced, and maybe not as rich as some other candidate's parents? D…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 01:36 PM
1

look, where you say this: in a situation where it can save me a lot of money (or time) I would weigh sex as a factor. That is sexual discrimination. Suppose you're looking for a very special mathematician, and most mathematicians fail. You have to interview an average of 27 males candidates before you find someone who meets your very special requirement, and have to reivew an average of 32 female candidates before you meet someone who meets your very special requirements. This is a pretty genuin…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 04:59 PM
1

why don't you do as I suggest (asking your friends who are women) then get back to me.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 08:51 PM
1

so if you're friends with intelligent women, the next time you're in a comfortable social situation with them (not over facebook or something, in person), as an aside ask them if they would tell you whether, as women, they have faced substantive discrimination and if they can give you an example. It's one thing to think "strangers" are misleading you and others, but I think when you hear it from your friends you are more likely to be open to their stories.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 01:29 PM
1

But there are cases where your money actually isn't on the line - just a slight bit of inconvenience. For example, if your requirement for a job is exactly and precisely that the applicant needs to be 6'3" (1 meter 91 cm), that is the extent of the requirements (obviously other than being over 18 and stuff like that), it doesn't matter why. Now you can more easily find someone to fill that roll if you throw away every applicant who doesn't have a "traditionally black, male" name,. i.e. you throw…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/17 09:10 PM
1

this is kind of a men's forum, what you're asking me to reply with is getting really off-topic. If you're genuine about your questions set aside a few minutes to Google. it's really clearcut. like, this isn't something close. By the way, are you friends with any smart women?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 06:10 PM
1

this is literally the definition of sexual discrimination, bro. you have to invite everyone and determine their actual level of fit for the position. you can't go on generalizations. I don't know what we're really discussing here. what you've written is super- super- clearcut. About the only way you could get more clearcut is if you literally said, "We have an entrance exam people have to take. I'd rather hire a man, who was mentally retarded with an IQ of 75, who also failed the exam and would …
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 05:58 PM
1

sorry, you are for sexual discrimination. you just defined it explicitly.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 03:39 PM
0

a lot of you wrote was interesting but a lot of it near the end is also false. a person (a man) with a gender-neutral first name, but where most people assume it's a woman, started putting Mr in front (to specify their gender), and got a tenfold return on number of answers to their resumes/cv's. they weren't even being read before, and he wasn't called in for interviews. there are certainly places where women can't get equal jobs and pay easily. that doesn't detract from the other interesting po…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/17 05:44 PM
1

super interesting! Thanks.
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:54 AM
1

interesting link. (though it contains few specifics.) If this is true though it would seem men should be intensely interested in the exact details of women's previous sexual partners (how strong/smart/tall/etc they were), since it'll be the new guy's sperm and DNA but some extra-DNA positive effect. That's not shown in practice. and it's really quite a stretch scientifically - and was just shown on flies. I'll chalk that specific link up to pseudoscience for now.
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:53 AM
1

all right I guess. your other expression about losing the plot seems to be a britishism.
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:50 AM
0

I don't think I'd personally lose respect for my mom or any other woman if they blew the whole football team in summer camp. for your second example, obviously I'd be sad and disappointed in them if they did prostitution. that isn't a fair analogy, though, because men don't typically stand on street corners doing prostitution. if my father (instead of mother) did, I'd be disappointed in him too. (and yes, disgusted, lose respect.)
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:49 AM
0

This was an interesting answer, thanks.
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:46 AM
1

thanks for this reply.
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:40 AM
1

and all the actually good women will have nothing to do with her. Right there. Explain why a woman's poor sexual strategy would mean that other women don't want to do anything with her. For example, women who are poor sexual partners for anyone, due to morbid obesity, have plenty of women friends, even much more attractive women. They're not judged for having a poor sexual strategy with regard to their health and fitness. (Or are they?) I see many groups of friends like that.
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:31 AM
1

A girl fucking one guy every day for a decade is respected compared to a girl who had a guy every year or worse yet, tons of one night stands Yes, I agree. Girls who just do that are judged. right. I'm trying to figure out examples of this. Judged how, like a crack addict? I don't think you and I disagree at all about the idea that women are judged if they are known to have a lot of sex with different men. I'm trying to figure out when and where, and how, this judgment specifically manifests. I …
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:29 AM
1

fair answer! Thanks.
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:25 AM
0

Why would women care about what their girlfriends think? (Girlfriends who have no contact with any of the men they're dating.)
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:24 AM
1

Do you think this is the source of "playing hard to get"? I have a question, though: if men thought women were worth less if they were seen as slutty, then wouldn't women try to have the other women they compete against be seen as slutty? If Anna wants a guy and Betty wants a guy (let's call him Chad in both cases, to make it ABC), it seems Anna would benefit from making Chad think Betty is a slut - because in your theory Chad is less likely to bang Betty in this case. But that doesn't explain w…
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:21 AM
-1

you've told me why some women would not want to be promiscuous as a theoretical sexual strategy. You've said nothing about why anyone else would care or condemn them. Why would society condemn them. a slut is a woman who's lost the plot what does "who's lost the plot" mean? people will assume the same thing about you damaging your reputation. right, you haven't talked much about the reputation aspect. What exactly happens? I think I might have to ask women, though here on reddit I've been banned…
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:18 AM
0

I still find many great points of disagreement between me and TRP, but which can also simply be things I don't understand, so I don't see why I shouldn't post. Many of my questions are specifically feminist/egalitarian so they get relatively little coverage here. (Many people on TRP are downright misogynistic, for example using derogatory language about women for no reason, and saying they shouldn't have equal opportunities.) What you've said about not being apologetic was interesting. Most of m…
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:16 AM
0

I'm trying to understand what you're saying but I'm having a lot of trouble. After someone gives away sex, they still have it. (it doesn't disappear, it's not like giving a physical object away.) For this reason I don't understand the analogy with "giving something valuable away". Also you say the judgment happens because they "gave it away" but specifically in a "stupid" way. Are you saying that if they gave it away in a "smart" way they are not seen as a slut? What is giving it away in a "smar…
/r/askTRP25/10/17 02:10 AM
-1

Can you translate this into social terms? (I mean at the office, among their friends.) It seems there are serious negative social repercussions to being seen as slutty, I mean in their everyday lives. What are these? What happens, exactly? Can you be specific?
/r/askTRP25/10/17 01:57 AM
2

[EDIT: crossed off most of my original question. I was wrong.] I'm pretty surprised at your reaction, I didn't think anyone would disagree that there are genuine lesbians. Why do you think any lesbians would go decades without sleeping with any man? The genuine lesbians I know aren't even attracted to straight erotica written for women, which are pretty absurd, and simply never sleep with men. I want to support your point, too. Here is an askreddit thread I found, "gay men and women of reddit, d…
/r/askTRP25/10/17 01:22 AM
1

[Edit: after investigation, the below was completely wrong.] But why does the red pill say "AWALT" when some women are lesbians (and some men are gay also, just, not attracted to women.) I don't mean women who are experimenting or on the fence about it, some women are in decades-long relationships (even get married) with women, and many just aren't turned on by men. So why the generalization that every woman without exception is turned on by the same thing? I do realize that there are some bisex…
/r/askTRP25/10/17 12:49 AM
1

Yes I've heard that fallacy. So all right, you're right, my suggestion that askfeminism isn't feminist is a clear example of the "no true scotsman fallacy". (in the form: well a real feminist wouldn't ban my reasonable feminist opinion from a feminism discussion subreddit that is open to debate and discussion...) So at some point it might be appropriate to do away with labels. Where you yourself said you agree with: "Allowing men and women the same basic human rights" which a bit charitably we c…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/17 02:03 AM
1

I meant to write phd, which I corrected (sorry). I don't know man, it seems like red pillers think they're supposed to be keeping a harem of uninteresting 18-22 year old girls without career or educational ambitions and who are pretty (and invest most of their time and energy into being pretty) but without any intelligence. is this your goal? are you happy with such women? That said, I do use some of the advice from the red pill in my dating life, which is with educated and interesting women. Bu…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 10:17 PM
1

your comment is a GREAT example of why I disagree fundamentally with red pill philosophy, and consider it bad, and misogynistic, and just awful. I dont' accept it at all. You write: So she rides the cock carousel on and off until she's about 26.. "Oh shit, I'll be 30 soon. Baby time". So she'll try to lock down an alpha bucks but she's not pretty enough to get one to marry her, Why, in your story, isn't she a committed researcher and scientist throughout her twenties, taking advantage of the hug…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 07:02 PM
1

you don't have to go as far as the end of your paragraph, with the false rape-charge, to have an interesting reason why they wouldn't talk about their sexual desires openly, insofar as they are submissive. makes sense. It's also not wrong or immoral or something. it makes sense for that to be a hidden part of the conversation, or brushed under the table. I don't think it's wrong of them to want to be powerful personally and professionally - I think it's great that individuals of both genders are…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 06:53 PM
1

No, it just means that askfeminism isn't feminist. the fat promotion movement isn't feminist either, to use a different example, even though apparently some people think it is, including some people who call themselves feminists.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 11:25 AM
1

yes it has a moral basis. in my opinion ethics (morality) doesn't just derive from religion but can be derived philosophically. Let's take practices around the world that are extremely unfeminist, even by red pill standards: there are places that trade in women as literal (not figurative, I mean abducted and enslaved) slaves for sex. (Without basic rights, so that they would have to escape their literal, not figurative, enslavement.) surely you agree that literal sex slavery is wrong - and that …
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 12:28 AM
1

I always believed that women should be able to thrive, compete with men, vote etc. wait, wait, wait. So at this point as a deep red-piller do you not even think women should be allowed to vote? how about drive? own businessees? attend university? I read the rest but I'm having trouble with this sentence. By the way I don't mind finding the one woman out of 100 who is happy with equality. :). those odds aren't as bad as you think. thanks for everything you wrote - I don't have a lot more time but…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:54 PM
1

that is a huge stretch my friend.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:50 PM
1

You're right, that is funny. I can see why some people would avoid the feminist label then, since that shit is wrong. Men and women should be fit and healthy, which means not obese, and society should encourage that and fight against things (such as portion sizes, advertising, food availability), that make it difficult for boys and girls, and then men and women, to do this. However, while you call fat acceptance a "feminist" movement, it's not feminist by my personal definition because it doesn'…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:36 PM
1

You write this: If you actually understood this content, you wouldn't be a feminist. Let's for a moment define feminism very, very narrowly: women should be allowed to pursue education and work in line with their skills; they should be able to add value while being judged on their skills. That's a feminist position. Is it possible for me to retain this feminist position while "understanding the content" of this subreddit? (The negative of the position is that women should not be allowed to pursu…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:26 PM
1

you left out obesity, if you're just going to come up with reasons past inequality was so awesome. the average american man and woman used to be a lot more fit. (I'm being sarcastic. I'm saying your metrics aren't relevant to the question.)
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:20 PM
0

thanks for that. no objection to what you've just written and suggested.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:16 PM
-1

Okay, so I perfectly understand your analogy. It might make sense if it were 2075 and feminism were in a very different state. As of the year I'm living in, if I woke up tomorrow as a woman, I couldn't do my work seriously, I'd have to lie about or hide my gender online, and so forth. As a specific example, women programmers have their code fail code review more often unless they hire their gender. In which case their code passes review more often than their male peers, because it's actually hig…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:16 PM
1

Come on. Yes, I have heard what you're saying but it is such a generalization. Also you're acting like most people who date and have sex do so with the goal of either getting pregnant or getting someone else pregnant. Since most people who date casually use protection, this is not a good explanation. It can be an explanation for what is ATTRACTIVE, i.e. what turns men and women on. But you can't pretend that this is why people actually do things. Also what about gay people and lesbians, again, I…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:09 PM
-2

what is this "saving" thing? I've already benefited from adopting some of the advice that I read here (that passes my feminist filter). Why would it have to be all or nothing, like, what, I should accept that women are inferior to men or something and should have less power in society, fewer opportunities, and so forth? For me, the small tips that I do take are just about dating/sex, and that's it. I don't see why I have to adopt a whole misogynistic outlook, or why it threatens you if I don't.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:02 PM
0

okay, thanks for your answers. I don't have an opinion on these biological / social urges you site. I think the red pill likes to play evolutionary biologist which I can hardly judge. technological progress, access to education, and so forth, are all easier for me to judge. that said some of the advice on the red pill (that I don't consider unfeminist) has helped in my dating life so I suppose I have to retain an open mind.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 06:00 PM
1

that is true. I think society as a whole benefits from women's greater access to education, their greater involvement in all parts of society, science, business, technology, research, leadership opportunities, and so forth. But you are right, I did not give the specific quantitative metrics that prove this. I would like to hope it's obvious.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 05:56 PM
0

Equal opportunity is fine. just so you know, this makes you a feminist. As for the rest, out of all the places to discuss the merits of quotas and so forth this is the weirdest, we don't have to get into that discussion here. plus it's certainly outside of our expertise, or at least mine. when I was a teen I could give a kneejerk reaction to any political question in a matter of seconds, without any research, and instantly be perfectly right 100% of the time, whereas these days I try to at least…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 05:35 PM
-1

well, then I'm not the only one. there are regularly posts and comments of the type that I mentioned. Another poster has stated that the reason for this is: But you have to remember that most of the posts are from newcomers and as such it'll always be a volatile place. so there is a lot of hate and so forth that is frequently expressed.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 05:28 PM
1

what do children do instead of working? Go to school. Basic literacy in developed countries is basically 100%. (Go look up statistics.) I can't imagine how anyone would think society would be better-off if people weren't 'forced' to go to school, with child labor being illegal. There would be a group of literally illiterate people. (Those children after they grew up.) I'm not saying society is perfect but come on.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 05:21 PM
1

Yes, that's all right by me. I'm just here for the sex, not to oppress women. I might always be "blue pill". That doesn't mean that I can't adopt some red pill stuff that turns women on and isn't against feminism, preferably with their consent. It's funny that even a critical reference to these things got me banned from those subreddits.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 05:04 PM
-1

I do echo their sentiments, sure. I think women should have equal opportunities to contribute to society and society has reaped huge benefits from their joining education, the workforce, etc, and doing many professional, creative, artistic, research, etc, jobs previously all only open to men. that makes me a feminist. Out of curiosity, what makes you think I'm not a feminist? (It is true that I'm a man. I don't care that much about feminist stuff, I don't base my life around it, I didn't major i…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 04:45 PM
1

I shared it in a reply just now but automod removed it. (By the way the original post I quoted from was removed.) I've instead sent you this reply by PM.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 04:42 PM
0

I found the definition here, I was just wondering if you were going by a different definition. I don't really agree with that characterization, I think it's possible to enter long-term relationships lasting 50 years in one's twenties. There are lots of historical examples. The fact that many women are sexually more open to different kinds of relationships is not a way to generalize. As for me, I've begun dating a couple of years ago after being in very long relationships previously. I found some…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 04:31 PM
1

yes that's a very helpful observation about many sexually submissive woman and it is a feminist observation and inplies consent. this is the part I like and I think can be retained and kept without feminist objection. why do feminists hide and censor the observation you've just highlighted?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 03:51 PM
0

Where you just used the "more problematic" description of red pill long term relationship strategies, what did you mean? what makes them "problematic"? (when I use this word I mean it's immoral and shouldn't be done, or at least needs to be handled carefully to be moral - but that doesn't seem to be your usage.) what does the words "bux" mean? bucks, like buckles or gives in? strange word. A last question: does everything always have to be about sex?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 03:46 PM
0

Does this extend to what you see as the historical foundation of feminism? Do you think that the basic idea that men and women should have equal opportunities and rewards is a good ideal? Is it fair to say that many red pillers are "male supremecists" the way KKK members are "white supremecidts"? Do you think that philosophy is acceptable?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 01:56 PM
-1

Actually your comment is a great exanple of red pill having a little bit of great, useful advice, buried in crap that needs filtering (and is wrong). Some of what you wrote is true and works. At the same time it doesn't address actual coercion that women don't want. (even secretly.) By coercion I meant things like (to use an extreme example) "have sex with me or I'll fire you" by someone they're not attracted to. I've known women that happened to. What do you think their reaction was? why? what …
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 01:52 PM
1

I guess. I'm not happy with them and want them to improve.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 01:46 PM
-1

This was very interesting. Your analogy at the end is funny. Could you please elaborate? What do you see feminism as? Why does it exist? What are it's goals? How does this relate to sex and relationships?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 10:56 AM
0

This is an interesting perspective that I'd like not to comment on. Certainly there is some simple information in the red pill that is true and not a problem morally. (For example, if someone starts going to the gym and lifting, they'll be more successful in their dating lives.)
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 10:50 AM
1

Are you saying women shouldn't work and study and be doctors, scientists and so forth?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 10:48 AM
2

Just for your information, what you've just stated isn't nearly as bad as what they state about 'red-pillers'. This level of animosity is just unreal. it's hard to believe. As for what you've just written, it's a pretty incomplete theory, because it does not explain why some men would be feminists, and doesn't explain why women who are in monogamous relationships (like long marriages) can be feminist. That includes some of the posters there.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 10:46 AM
1

Right, yes: I disagree. So very quickly let's make sure that having any laws is okay: you know, the idea that might doesn't make right. If I'm walking down the street and I happen to be carrying a gun, if I look at you and think "man that guy sucks" I can't just shoot you, right? why not? Evolutionarily if people can kill each other whenever they want only the strong would survive? Well no, society doesn't work that way, there's a huge benefit to being protected without having to walk around in …
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 10:43 AM
-8

suppose (and this is not true) that I'd automatically be the sexiest person on the planet to about a billion women, if I were just the evilest and killed 10 million people. should I do it? of course not. What do I need a billion wet panties for. how does a billion wet panties help me. plus even that assumption is false. So even if we assume this false assumption, at some point there are diminishing returns. Why not also be a good little boy, as you put it? I don't really need to make every panty…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 03:18 AM
-1

So check it out, you and I completely 100% disagree, and I think what you're saying is wrong and historically inaccurate and also sets back society a lot. Firstly, you say there is no rationality or logic behind feminism - but it has an extremely extensive literature and history, and achieves things that can be quantitatively seen as improvements. If you went to college you've had women professors who a few generations ago would not have had the same possibility for advanced study, today more th…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 02:25 AM
-7

yeah so I don't believe in 'us' vs 'them'. There's many things that are wrong in TRP. Obviously I wouldn't be here, as well as posting a blue pill example, if some of the advice weren't immediately useable without any feminist objection of any kind. For example the suggestion that guys (who are interested in attracting women) should go to the gym and lift, doesn't have any feminist or antifeminist component. As a piece of advice it's just not in the field of feminism. lifting just works and ther…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 02:05 AM
-4

I'm used to citing my sources. Notice that I cite my source here in this post, going through archive as directed. Why is the red pill open to evaluating sources (in fact it has a rule that examples should be real, not from fiction) but reddit's feminism can't handle it? (Very critically.) It doesn't make sense. What kind of bullshit is having to hide my sources? Over in the blue pill subreddit there was an example of a woman who destroyed her own amazing relationship because she was convinced th…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 01:12 AM
1

I wasn't familiar with ppd, this is purple pill debate? Can you summarize anything good from there? (I will read that community later.) As for what use the question is: this is VERY fundamental for some reason (that beats me.) Even in the most succinct possible summary I saw it stated that women feel it is very, very important not to feel or be seen as sluts. As a man I hardly care. As a man I also don't really care how sexual ("slutty") a woman is, so I don't understand the big deal. One of the…
/r/askTRP19/10/17 11:21 PM
1

because she was sexually forward? I really don't follow. Like, this seems a mystery. Even in modern times we hear about the "salem witch trials" where people got punished for being witches - but where is the societal mechanism for being promiscuous? Even far before feminist times I can't think of historical women who were "kicked out of a tribe" for being slutty. Do you know of any examples?
/r/askTRP19/10/17 10:44 PM
1

thanks. Do you have any ideas why this is the case? I don't understand it. In today's gender roles I don't see such a huge difference between men and women and I feel like they could get what they want easily by explicitly asking for it. Any thoughts?
/r/askTRP19/10/17 09:58 PM
1

I'm sorry you've been victimized by women touching you. I think women in general are quite responsive to calls to back off, since they've all experienced unwanted advances. I am sure if you told them, hey, don't touch me please, they would back off a lot. They are hypersensitive due to the common assaults and advances they have to put up with. This goes for every woman. As far as the concern you listed: Just wait until the wrong girl can't get what she wants out of you or you accidentally say th…
/r/askTRP19/10/17 08:39 PM
2

This is unreal. From your story it sounds like she waited hours and hours and hours for you to make a move. Like, patiently waited. While expecting sex. This kind of confirms what some other people have told me that many women in today's dating scene expect sex to "just happen", and many women expect men to be "responsible" for it. Thanks for sharing this story.
/r/askTRP19/10/17 07:25 PM
1

More excellent advice. This is awesome, thanks.
/r/askTRP19/10/17 07:21 PM
1

Thanks, this was super-interesting. When you say women often fear rejection, does it count as rejection if they are coming onto you very strongly (through very strong nonverbal cues) but you don't respond to it? What I mean is that when I didn't escalate in response to strong nonverbal cues, would those women have felt "rejected" by me? I myself would never consider it a rejection if I tried to get someone to notice me but they didn't, that just isn't in the category of "rejection" to me, it's n…
/r/askTRP19/10/17 07:19 PM
1

haha, actually I did try but she has nothing interestnig at home, by her description just some clothes strewn about. I did try to go for just inviting me for a tea, but she said she doesn't have tea. (Who doesn't have tea??) Okay, I'll tell you that I'm kind of new to some of trp stuff so I actually involved her and let her know about some of the techniques that I follow. So I said at one point something like, "well since you don't have tea let's make this a team effort, and come up with some ex…
/r/askTRP10/10/17 01:08 AM
2

Thanks! I like your example and story. Let's see what happens :)
/r/askTRP10/10/17 12:41 AM
3

Thanks. For this specific situation I really like this answer in this thread and I feel it would have been appropriate and met her needs. Like, we were practically having sex outside. But I will keep your answers in mind too.
/r/askTRP10/10/17 12:07 AM
11

Thanks, great answer! This was actually the answer to my question. It would have worked, and also we were practically having sex in the streets. Man, where were you two hours ago haha. Just because you were just so helpful, do you (specifically you mm) have any other specific tips like this about hooking up when the guy and girl wants it but it's their first time meeting, so it's kind of awkward? I read this post very carefully and think it's pretty good. You don't have to read it but if you hav…
/r/askTRP09/10/17 11:50 PM
8

In this subreddit I'm asking you. You don't have to answer. You've now sent me 4 replies across 3 subreddits but did not answer my question here, where I asked it. If you know what you would do go ahead and tell me here, if not please go away. In this subreddit I'm asking trp advice. And no, I don't need to create a separate throwaway for trp and a separate throwaway for women's subreddits, because only a total loser would troll through my posting history and start insulting me based on what sub…
/r/askTRP09/10/17 11:45 PM
3

can you kindly translate your advice into specific actions? you are making out with a girl who has walked you to her apartment. she says you can't come up. What specifically do you do? Just name the specific action or words. Thanks.
/r/askTRP09/10/17 11:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter