TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

trialblog Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by trialblog on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I’ve been getting so many PMs about writing a post on daygame that I feel I have to mention here: I have little to no experience in this area, and I’m afraid I wouldn’t want to attempt to talk out of my ass about it. Men only approach me by the cover of night. I do not know what this says about me I don't think it says anything about you at all -- I find the perception that women get approached all day long quite weird, frankly, because it doesn't happen to me or to the women I know.
/r/seduction11/08/13 10:21 PM
2

So I guess the problem with men is that they don't need women to provide for them?
/r/seduction18/07/13 07:23 PM
2

What were you trying to say with that comment? That she has big tits? That she has small tits? That she has tits? A 75C (34C in US sizing) means her boobs are neither big nor small, so I'm trying to work out what you're trying to convey with that comment. I am going to blow your mind: there are bras that are available in cups past DD, even up to something like a KK. So you also may have been dead wrong in a way that made her think you were a douchecanoe. Don't spit out a specific bra size becaus…
/r/seduction14/07/13 10:55 AM
2

http://creepywhiteguys.tumblr.com/ Unless you can stop men from doing it, you're going to have to deal with that perception by not being that guy.
/r/seduction11/07/13 02:14 AM
2

It always makes me think the OP is an anthropologist from another planet when they refer to women as 'females.'
/r/seduction07/07/13 09:43 AM
2

It's pretty bad advice though. Seddit would be much more useful.
/r/seduction26/06/13 10:31 PM
1

Have you tried /r/nonmonogamy?
/r/seduction31/05/13 08:42 PM
2

This popped up in my tumblr dash not too long ago. I don't know how useful you'll find it because it seems to be more geared towards couples and not people just getting to know each other, but I thought I'd throw it out there. For me personally, the feeling of sex being expected is the worst one, and being comfortable that the guy will listen to my no and pay attention to my responses is super important.
/r/seduction07/05/13 05:10 AM
6

Yeah, Roissy is one of those bloggers that contribute to a really negative public perception of pickup, because he is in actuality a racist, misogynist prick who seems to foam at the mouth at the thought of women living their lives without constantly thinking about men.
/r/seduction05/05/13 11:37 PM
2

I agree. I think it degrades the quality of the threesome, to be honest -- the sex is much hotter if people aren't sloppy drunk.
/r/seduction02/05/13 03:31 PM
6

she's symbolic of my welbeing and my status What the fuck? Please move on for your own good and quit being a douchenozzle.
/r/seduction26/04/13 08:17 PM
30

This is Pascal's Wager, but with shit tests instead of god.
/r/seduction23/04/13 07:16 AM
1

So we agree with each other.
/r/seduction08/04/13 02:06 AM
13

As a woman, I disagree with the overall tone of your post, especially since you do come across as equating high self-esteem with the desire for a relationship, and low self-esteem with being willing to have sex. I'm not sure if that was your intent, but it's a very sex-negative message. This and then wonder how many STIs he has contributes to my impression. Thing is, you are posting about your specific parameters. What turns you off, what you like, what your self-esteem makes you think and do. I…
/r/seduction07/04/13 07:38 PM
3

Ideally, both parties want that style of relationship and both parties have honest communication. Trying to mix mono-poly is often an epic train wreck, and that effect is compounded by bad communication. But if it's not your cuppa, it's not your cuppa, I just thought I'd chime in because I've seen it work.
/r/seduction04/04/13 02:27 AM
2

Open relationship =/= no commitment. You're conflating sexual and emotional exclusivity with commitment, and there are plenty of couples who are committed enough to buy a house together or have kids but still maintain a non-exclusive relationship.
/r/seduction04/04/13 02:18 AM
1

There is no science. What science does the author reference? It is a fluff piece, because none of the assertions are backed up.
/r/seduction02/04/13 03:03 AM
1

That's what I get for making comments on my phone.
/r/seduction25/03/13 07:02 AM
2

While I appreciate Sex at Dawn's attempt at breaking down current cultural narrative about monogamy being the only good sexuality, I have to give the authors some serious side-eye for consistently misquoting studies to prove their points. Emily Nagoski at The Dirty Normal has some good break downs of how they misuse scientific material.
/r/seduction22/03/13 11:19 PM
2

This honestly confuses me. You want something you have less control over than behavior or dress to count for more? For women, the intense focus on appearance (almost to the exclusion of everything else) is not a gift. It means that an otherwise awesome woman is more likely to get looked over. It creates an intense pressure to meet standards of beauty. It means they are numbers on an (incorrectly used) scale. You have less agency, not more, when you wait around and hope your appearance attracts a…
/r/seduction20/03/13 07:10 PM
1

I assume you meant inherent as opposed to inherit. So, on that point, what you perceive to be her sexual value is not at all inherent, and is a social construct -- you place the value upon her and it has nothing to do with her person or nature. She doesn't give a shit and goes on with her life; you're obsessing about the differences in your "sexual value." As for cheating, if you don't like it when women wear makeup, don't date women who wear makeup. In my experience, guys pay more attention and…
/r/seduction20/03/13 12:36 AM
11

Her having a boyfriend doesn't matter. You can't read her mind, and you don't need to. This is why you need to escalate until verbal rejection, so that you don't disqualify yourself.
/r/seduction16/03/13 05:42 AM
1

Same as the services offered by other PUA coaches and bootcamps, and people still pay for those.
/r/seduction07/03/13 07:10 PM
1

PUA hipsters?
/r/seduction06/03/13 10:14 AM
1

It doesn't matter matter why. Because she was drunk. Because she wanted to make someone else feel awkward. Why are you so concerned with the why?
/r/seduction05/03/13 10:59 PM
1

Even if you pay to get into to a party (and they do exist), it's unlikely that you'll get a "pre-approved group fuck." Still gotta convince people that you're worth having sex with.
/r/seduction28/02/13 08:15 AM
1

Yeah, this is pretty common. A lot of women won't look you in the eye or smile at you for various reasons -- she's nervous, she doesn't want to be approached, she's preoccupied with her own thoughts, etc. You should approach if you want to approach and just remember to move on if she's totally not into it.
/r/seduction11/02/13 04:43 AM
3

Thanks for posting this! This is the kind advice a lot of girls are looking for and not getting -- specific, practical, and not blinkered by the assumption that physically attractive women can get any guy they want merely by existing.
/r/seduction07/02/13 08:13 PM
3

You have a problem, and it's your mindset: "he wouldn't like me if he really knew me, he only likes what I look like and what he thinks I am" This is called projecting, and you can change your pattern of thinking so that you don't do it anymore. Guys talk about this kind of insecurity all the time on seddit in one form or another -- they have AA, they try to read a girl's mind and come up with the worst possible scenario, they are down on themselves. Changing these attitudes is part of the inner…
/r/seduction07/02/13 07:23 PM
2

I said that looks are more important to have than "social traits" for women and the other way around for men. I'll give you that; I was being overly dramatic. Your claims are still way too broad-based without any evidence. You cannot draw conclusions from your own life and extrapolate them to biological drives causing certain social behaviors and psychological states, because you have no way to isolate the multiplicity of variables that influence your and other people's behavior and patterns of …
/r/seduction06/02/13 03:36 AM
1

If good genes = good looks, then women would absolutely have a primitive desire for good looks, as much as any man's, because that particular reproductive imperative doesn't change between sexes if it's not tempered by anything else. So men only act from that reproductive imperative and from no other factor, and women never act from that factor? Also implied in your comment is that only women have to seek out a mate with optimal social traits for protecting her offspring. And men do not? If he r…
/r/seduction05/02/13 09:59 PM
1

The analogy isn't perfect. I was more thinking of the aspect that most people can't verbalize what attracts them and that men are no different. Personally I don't think any of those things are a zero-sum game either; I'm more interested in creating a mutual experience than an adversarial one.
/r/seduction05/02/13 05:04 PM
2

Well, in this case, the guys are the fish giving bad advice to the fisherman.
/r/seduction05/02/13 04:39 PM
1

Because girls who are into drugs and sex are mean, amirite?
/r/seduction04/02/13 11:19 PM
2

This is a good explanation, especially of the (bullshit) concept of sex economics.
/r/seduction01/02/13 10:10 PM
1

Cite your sources.
/r/seduction29/01/13 10:14 PM
1

What is it with people in seddit lately wanting to create the false dichotomy of being good at getting laid vs. getting into a relationship? These are not mutually exclusive categories.
/r/seduction26/01/13 05:36 PM
1

Have you tried getting some therapy? This seems like it goes way beyond game, beyond approach anxiety, and into territory where your dissatisfaction with the girl situation is affecting your overall life. You could try /r/depression or /r/psychology, and I would highly recommend "Feeling Good" by David Burns to change negative thought patterns and achieving greater overall self-esteem. The book was helpful to me in several different areas of my life and I think it may be helpful for you.
/r/seduction26/01/13 06:05 AM
3

Also seems like cognitive bias: the travel guide.
/r/seduction25/01/13 10:47 PM
2

It's hard to plow through red lights such as a verbal rejection, or her ignoring you. You are much better off assuming attraction and taking the chance at rejection.
/r/seduction23/01/13 09:09 PM
1

But you're still not giving a solution to the problem you've decided to address: if pickup advice is currently one size fits all, how could one make it targeted to the different personality types? I don't think it's necessary, like I said, since I would say that concept of congruence covers the obvious fact that different people are different. I am curious as to how you'd answer the above question.
/r/seduction18/01/13 07:29 PM
1

Read all the comments, and I still don't see what introversion and extroversion have to do with pickup advice. It's not directed towards extroverts IMO and it you wanted to make your point perhaps you could provide examples of advice directed towards introverts? That would be more interesting than arguing over whether it's a valid way to label yourself.
/r/seduction18/01/13 03:49 PM
3

Well-said! I disagree on a few minor points, but overall I think the pick-up community can benefit both men and women by a) putting the tools of seduction into the hands of awesome men and b) making sex and courtship into this awesome mutual experience instead of everyone hoping that the other person will read their minds.
/r/seduction13/01/13 09:47 AM
2

Why? If you can't communicate with your SO about how you feel, then your relationship isn't in good shape anyway. Of course, I'm leaving aside the fact that this might come from a place of insecurity, since we know next to nothing about the friend or his GF.
/r/seduction08/01/13 05:34 PM
10

I don't see the problem, because I don't think you did anything wrong. Coming from a female perspective, I love building attraction/flirting/whatever you want to call it with platonic friends and it doesn't mean they're hitting on me or that I'm hitting on them. We both know that it's just a good time, and it sounds like you and girl from your story know that as well? And not to be an asshole, but you can't be responsible for everyone else's emotions and insecurities. Sounds like your friend nee…
/r/seduction08/01/13 11:41 AM
3

I agree -- too much adversarial interaction is tiring. If you want a girl that brings value to the relationship, I think it's a bad idea to try to make her think she's less valuable.
/r/seduction19/12/12 05:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter