tricrunchatops Archive

TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Someone isn't representing TRP very well		tricrunchatops	/r/TheRedPill	26/06/16 01:39 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Someone isn't representing TRP very well Logical advice is practical advice. Bold claims that can't be backed up with evidence are not taken seriously in the logical world of mathematics, science, and engineering. We are simply recommending a shift in attitude toward being more objective instead of subjective when making bold claims.	/r/TheRedPill	26/06/16 03:23 PM
1	Someone isn't representing TRP very well I think you guys are missing the point. We are attacking the argument because it's about logic, and it is blatantly illogical. And 10 thousand people follow this website and mostly agree with what he says. Uses of logic, if one has any understanding of it, are not up for changing to suit your needs. Logic is linear. Abstract uses have rules as well. It's like math. We can't change how it works to suit our agenda. Anyone on any side of any argument will benefit from using it properly. It is as si…	/r/TheRedPill	26/06/16 03:12 PM
2	Someone isn't representing TRP very well If you were going to do a logical analysis like the one you did on every post on TRP you would find a myriad of logical fallacies. Even outside of TRP, if you did that same thing, you would find, non-stop, logical fallacies. In fact, I believe is hard to find an article making a concise point that doesn't contain them. I don't really like the way illimitable man writes a lot of the times. I agree with his ideology, specially the one presented on that post you linked. Because it resonates with my…	/r/TheRedPill	26/06/16 02:30 PM
3	Someone isn't representing TRP very well You're right, what struck my nerve was that someone decided 50 percent of the population was more logical than another 50 percent of the population without using an ounce of logic or cited data in his essays, and other people seemed to think this was acceptable. Ad hominem attack requires that we attack the speaker, and not the argument. We have attacked the argument. Please re-read the definition of ad hominem attack here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem	/r/TheRedPill	26/06/16 02:09 PM

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter