TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

triplehelix_ Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by triplehelix_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

imagine thinking fucking gold leaf on your food was fancy. tacky as shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 08:12 PM
18

that guy is such a d-bag it cracks me up. he's like a ben stiller character.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 08:10 PM
10

bakava is expensive because its kind of a pain in the ass to make. and i second the turk, try it with pistachio.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 08:04 PM
2

because its my job to educate every clueless yahoo who thinks they know what they are talking about? here, i spent all the energy i'm going to spend on your worthless, clueless self in the 3 fucking seconds it took to find this mostly relevant link. read up and get a fucking half a clue dipshit. https://atkinsonlawoffices.com/blog/the-victim-is-not-pressing-charges-why-am-i-still-being-charged/
/r/MensRights06/10/17 07:39 PM
2

its difficult to understand because you don't know what you are talking about, and are coming up with all kinds of nonsense highlighting that.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 07:31 PM
1

i have a clue because i bothered to educate myself on the laws governing me, and how they work. individuals don't "press charges", prosecutors do. whats my source? standing legislation and the associated historical judicial process. If someone punches you, you choose not to press charges, no crime was committed? i don't even understand this line of thinking. how does a crime magically not happen depending on if the victim of battery files a complaint or not? you seem to be confusing civil cases …
/r/MensRights06/10/17 07:17 PM
3

except for the fact that it is. the fact that you don't have the first clue what you are talking about doesn't change that.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:27 PM
3

its true with any criminal violation. you are again incorrect if by "CC fraud" you are referring to credit card fraud. that is absolutely a criminal violation, and does not require any entity to "press charges" for the criminal justice system to charge the offending party with a crime.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:22 PM
4

Doesn't change a thing about what I said yes, what you said: maybe the woman should be brought up on charges, but that's only if he presses charges. is still incorrect.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:47 PM
6

criminal prosecution doesn't require a victim to "press charges".
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:42 PM
4

the foreskin/frenulum is the primary erogenous part of male genitalia, containing the most densely nerved part of the penis. it also protects the penile glans exactly like the clitoral hood protects the clitoral glans. the penile glans is a mucus membrane, just like the clitoral glans. removal of the foreskin causes the mucus membrane on the penile glans to dry out and thicken in a process called keratinization. additionally an intact penis offers benefits during intercourse, as the penis will g…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/17 02:07 AM
2

the one that shows that men compared to women face a disparity in every step of the criminal justice system 600% larger than the disparity across race lines that is so prominently discussed. https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:55 AM
5

men routinely have their genitals surgically altered without their consent, have no rights to control their reproductive capacity post conception, are 400% more likely to be the victim of murder, face a criminal justice system biased against them compared to women 600% more than the bias black americans face compared to white americans, are the victims of domestic violence at the same or higher rates at the hands of their female domestic partners compared to the inverse but have no systemic supp…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:46 AM
11

you can't have a gender matching or mismatching brain if there is no reliable brain gendering standard. you are trying to reconcile two incongruent concepts and there is no way to do it. i have read numerous studies, and not a single one of them draws the concrete conclusion you are trying to push. hell, they don't even claim to be able to identify criteria to reliably associate gender with brain structure let alone what you are claiming. maybe one day they will find brain structures that allow …
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 08:11 PM
5

where? last i saw when i looked not that long ago, there was no reliable brain gendering criteria.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 07:42 PM
1

it would take a very jarring adjustment period, but i'm a huge proponent.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 05:04 PM
1

i think it kind of does. if anything, i feel non-phonetic spelling is far more "stupid".
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 04:00 PM
1

it comes from the fact that "may've had" and "may of had", sound identical when spoken. it has no relation to actually using of and have interchangeably.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 03:34 PM
1

it comes from the fact that "may've had" and "may of had", sound identical when spoken.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 03:33 PM
5

But I know a lot of places and a lot of people believe that if you're intoxicated you can't really give full consent. yes, thats what they believe, but that isn't what the legal definitions define it as. you have to be effectively drunk to the point of incapacitation, like having to be supported to walk and unable to form coherent sentences, or passed out. if someone has sex with another person at that level of intoxication, of course its rape and the law will punish those proven to have done so…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 03:24 PM
2

what kind of "active sex life" are you referring to for 13-17 year old girls? i'd say at that age, the level of activity with the variety of partners that it takes to get the reputation and reaction you are talking about isn't particularly healthy.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 03:19 PM
2

nope, you are just here to troll.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 09:52 PM
3

so you're just here to troll eh?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 09:51 PM
4

i was highlighting your hypocrisy which you didn't even attempt to defend. personally i'd like to see more women in stem fields.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 09:47 PM
7

are there laws preventing women going into stem fields or are they just pretending their oppressed so they have something to cry about?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 09:42 PM
4

lets not pretend its only rich white people that can buy their way through the court system. green is the real color that divides us in this country no matter how much people in different corners want to say otherwise.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/17 06:42 PM
–

the judge did acknowledge the guy as having been victimized by her, she just included other people hurt by the actions: “When you did what you did, you not only hurt (the ex-spouse), you hurt every real victim out there, every real complainant,” Ontario Court Justice Karen Lische told Gauthier, as she issued a 60-day sentence.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/17 08:24 PM
3

ok
/r/MensRights28/05/17 09:40 PM
4

i'm alright not needed to prove to anyone who or what i am because i know it unquestioningly. you do you though.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 09:29 PM
3

dude, i'm not gonna get into an internet pissing match with you. your anger is misdirected.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 09:11 PM
14

personally i think its more productive to focus on institutions taking steps to address issues like these more equitably, than to dwell on negatives.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:43 PM
–

jesus christ. keep on topic without bringing all your political baggage. there are tons of liberals who see this poster as a positive and acknowledge the issue.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:41 PM
1

no, i think what feminists did was great...for women. what they didn't do was even attempt to help the male victims of rape who's attacker is a woman, although they like to claim they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 03:05 PM
1

no, it doesn't. we can see this by what was actually desired by feminists when they successfully had the fbi expand their definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 09:23 PM
1

essentially forcing sex on anyone regardless of the mechanics is rape. the definition of rape feminists fought to be implemented on the federal level (fbi) does not include considering men who have had their penises enveloped by a vagina against their will as having been raped. thats not by accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 09:12 PM
1

i agree with the egalitarian definition of rape, not the practical feminist definition they have fought for.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 08:19 PM
0

one example in a sea of examples that don't support your stance. the federal definition, and the almost complete total of municipal definitions of rape do not include the non-consensual envelopment of a penis by a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:05 PM
0

its the fbi definition at issue, not congress, and feminists never once sought the non-consenting envelopment of a penis by a vagina as included in the definition of rape...anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:52 PM
0

Remember when feminists campaigned (successfully) to change the definition of rape so that in a legal sense, women could actually be found guilty of raping men? Before, the definition of rape was strictly about penetrating someone, so women could literally not be found guilty of rape unless she penetrated him that is completely false. what they did was expand the definition of rape to cover more women for various sexual acts. a woman who puts a mans penis in her mouth against his will, or who en…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:40 PM
1

no, you said she didn't do anything illegal. she did. her behavior absolutely meets the definition of several potential chargeable offenses.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 03:22 PM
1

you are defending her. you are up and down this thread saying she did nothing illegal.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 03:01 PM
2

a suspect is only proven or disproven of having committing a crime in court. a suspect is arrested for a crime based on suspicion. everyone is arrested for any crime before being proven to have committed the crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:55 PM
–

she didn't actually do anything illegal coercion, possibly extortion or blackmail, and certainly assault.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:52 PM
7

freedom of speach doesn't mean what you think it means. she is absolutely potentially guilty of coercion, possibly extortion or blackmail, and certainly assault. all crimes committed by verbally threatening and no more.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:52 PM
4

it is however illegal to use the threat of a false charge to coerce or extort someone into doing something, or to harm them.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:44 PM
0

you should have a better understanding of the law before you try and use it to defend pieces of shit online. she could absolutely be charged with coercion, possibly extortion, certainly assault, and definitely destruction of property.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:44 PM
2

the equitable compromise is everyone completely closes the lid after use. its also the healthiest/most sanitary behavior.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 04:25 PM
1

if you keep your toothbrush out on the counter and regularly flush with the lid up, its pretty much guaranteed you have shit particles on your toothbrush. whatever works for you though.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 04:14 PM
-2

you sound like you've never lived with someone of the opposite sex you like. living with other people means compromise, unless you are "that guy", and that guy quickly gets shuttled out of the relationship/apartment/house asap. consideration, or compromising to meet the needs/wants of those around you is part of being an adult. it also allows those around you to be considerate or compromise to meet your needs/wants more readily.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 04:13 PM
2

i'm guessing you don't see what i did there with the gender flip of OP's sentence?
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:56 PM
4

why would a woman ever tolerate her husband or any man raising a hand to her? who are these women?
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:31 PM
1

spelling smack talk is weak.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 03:32 PM
1

focus on the big issues facing men and real options to rectify them, and not get mired down in proselytizing anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 03:04 PM
5

i'm very vocal about mens rights, but this right here has no relevance to furthering the cause and highlighting it is the type of thing that hampers wider support.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:21 PM
1

your incorrect agenda driven drivel doesn't even come close to "pure reason". give me a break.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 12:30 AM
2

So, you agree that gender roles are just a social construct? in part. i think there are sex based proclivities and macro tendencies for aptitudes. i think society amplifies biology based proclivities and adds in some other stuff. that said, on the individual level, i do not believe any one individual should have macro level proclivities used to deny them personal freedoms or potential paths through life they choose for themselves. Because the step being taken that you seemed bothered by is going…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:57 PM
8

you seem to be confusing gender roles and gender. i agree with you that it is small minded to say women are the ones that care for children and men are not capable loving parents. that has exactly nothing to do with gender. that is gender roles.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:21 PM
3

yes, and some cultures believe their shamans have magic powers. does that make it true? are you seriously trying to position vodoo beliefs as validation of altering scientific classifications?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:15 PM
2

homosexuality is a biologic norm, seen in many species observed to one level or another. there are only two genders. most people don't care how any individuals wants to view themselves or live their lives. what most people push back against is the attempts to force everyone to indulge these individuals under penalty of criminal punishment. its an absolutely ridiculous idea to charge someone with a hate crime for calling a man "mr".
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:10 PM
1

no, there are two sexes. male and female. then there are those individuals with abnormalities.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 03:59 PM
3

if you cut off a lizards legs it doesn't make it a snake.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 03:54 PM
2

it would need to be limited to specific accusations and have ironclad guidelines. requiring the identity of the accused to be known is a specific protection put in place to make sure the government can't just "disappear" people.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:45 PM
10

did you stop reading there? your highlit section is directly followed by: There was no evidence the man was involved in encouraging the kidnapping. and: The teenagers refused to explain any of their online activities to the police, but claimed to others that the man in the chatroom was called Nazzer, and that he had put them up to the abduction. Police were not convinced. so the girls told other people the random dude in the chat was behind it and the police didn't buy their bullshit. the title …
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:31 PM
3

"possession is 9/10ths of the law" isn't a mathematically derived statistic. its a saying detailing the large impact possession has in areas of the law. a strong argument can be made for intent having as large an impact in different areas of the law. as for your example, its akin to saying if possession was 9/10ths of the law, you could get out of any crime by getting rid of the murder weapon. btw, you can potentially get out of a murder charge by saying "i didn't mean to".
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:20 PM
4

your example of manslaughter is a perfect example of intents place in the criminal justice system. the primary difference between manslaughter and a murder is intent.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:40 PM
0

pointing a gun isn't antagonizing someone. stay on topic. But isn't the point of this sub that if women want equality then they have to be ready to be punched in the face? considering the vast majority of the links on this sub don't involve women getting punched, i'm going to say you have an agenda and a predetermined bias that has no relation to verifiable reality. i think the point of this sub is that women want equality, but they need to accept the good with the bad. equality means your actio…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/16 06:51 PM
1

so to be clear, under some circumstances (depending on what is said) you think it is justified for a man to punch a woman in the face. could you give me one situation, or one example of something that could be said to justify that?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/16 03:18 PM
1

you're missing my point. antagonizing someone is never valid justification for the other person to punch them in the face, regardless of the genders of either participant.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/16 03:17 PM
2

so your saying antagonizing someone can justify them punching you in the face? so if a woman is antagonizing a man you are ok with him punching her in the face?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/16 06:13 AM
0

Human morality and ethics aren't universally agreed upon and differed widely across time and cultures. both are true of laws and punishments.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 03:24 AM
-1

no, death isn't the punishment for every crime because of human morality and ethics, specifically related to proportional application of punishment to suit the crime.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 02:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter