TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

trollyousoftly Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by trollyousoftly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I agree we don't know all the facts. But from the facts we do know, there is no reason the woman should be given preferential treatment. Until I'm presented with such a fact, that will remain my position.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 07:22 PM
1

The husband was charged with additional crimes: two counts of false imprisonment and a lone count of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. If the mother was doing the exact same thing as the father (i.e. playing video games while the children were captive in the household and being neglected) then she was as guilty of those two crimes as he was, yet she wasn't even charged for them.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:21 PM
2

I appreciate the time you spent looking for that. I edited as well.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:17 PM
2

The other first responses to OP automatically assumed that the reasoning for the tougher sentence was because of prejudice against men with the only evidence of this being the higher rate of harsher penalties Well I think that mentality goes back to my original point being there are no facts that distinguish between the man's and woman's culpability here. I again freely admit such facts may exist, but of they do, we don't know them. I'm all for shaking my fist in the air at a sexist justice syst…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:14 AM
1

however this is just hypothetical on hypothetical This was my main issue. You are assuming this isn't a men's rights issue based on pure conjecture - i.e. based on facts you don't know. From the facts we do know, they were both equally culpable. I'm certainly not saying you're wrong. You may very well be correct. But as of yet, you have no facts - only hypothetical scenarios - to backup your claim. That is why I found it odd you led your opening comment with a "for fuck sakes men's rights" attit…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:45 AM
1

Just looking at face value possibly because the police didn't have the evidence to charge them jointly. But it's two parents living in the exact same household committing the exact same negligent behavior against the exact same children. Both their own children. Perhaps you're right, but there are no facts I've read thus far that implicate the man any more than the woman. Equal culpability should mean equal crime and punishment. Remember police aren't in the habit of taking cases to trial they c…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:46 AM
5

Because their actions are, for all intents and purposes, identical. So the question is why were they charged with different crimes for the same actions?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:08 AM
2

Perhaps, but the question is why were the two convicted of different crimes/sentences when they seem to have done the same thing. They appear equally culpable.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:05 AM
14

The question is why was only the man charged? The couple seem equally culpable.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 02:57 AM
37

Ridiculous, unsurprising, and hilarious. They think a feminist started it: "This is real, fuck yeah, down with men and their oppressive holidays" (whatever the hell that even means). When they find out men started it as a joke they will undoubtedly turn this into another way they are being oppressed by men, even though it was such a grand idea when they thought it was started by a feminist. What a sad group of hypocritical sheeple.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter