~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | OnlyFans model jailed for over 22 years after hunting down her alleged rapist to kill himI can appreciate critique, but I think what irks me and probably others about your way of doing it in this comment chain is portraying it as (1) unimportant, or (2) as if the men deserve it to begin with because it will inevitably lead to murdering rapists and not just innocent people. Let alone I dont think many here believe that being raped is worse than being murdered (and that it is then proportional response) | /r/MensRights | 15/09/25 09:44 PM |
| 16 | OnlyFans model jailed for over 22 years after hunting down her alleged rapist to kill himidk, just seems like horrid optics, man. I've been listening to people like you say that in this sub for over a decade. If you're worried about optics, this isn't a group for you. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/25 09:37 PM |
| 30 | OnlyFans model jailed for over 22 years after hunting down her alleged rapist to kill himidk she was arrested and went to jail for it. And people, right here not only in this thread but on this comment chain, are saying shes justified. How you dont see that as an issue is absolutely wild. This seems like a very weird hill to die on when we could focus on stuff that more meaningfully affects average men who don't rape people. Because positng an article and having a stance is "focusing on it"? What a weird an asinine take. Especially considering the finality and severity of literal mu… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/25 08:10 PM |
| 53 | OnlyFans model jailed for over 22 years after hunting down her alleged rapist to kill himIt's a directly relevant topic to men's rights. Men accused of rape should be afforded the right to a fair trial. Whether he did it or not. And if he did, he can rot in jail. But encouraging this is a great way to punish more innocent men. And men are accused of rape far more than women are - so this is effectively an issue only affecting men. When all it takes is an accusation, what protects anyone from being killed unjustly? | /r/MensRights | 15/09/25 07:48 PM |
| 28 | If a guy goes in for a kiss on a first date and she turns her head…Probably 98% of the time, yes. But not always. Ive personally had that happen once. Later, she explained that she was just very shy. We were very young though, like 18. She made it very clear that same night she was still very much interested. Still, I wouldn't recommend proceeding as if there's any interest. | /r/seduction | 16/08/25 03:39 PM |
| 13 | "Women expressed envy towards men in...salary, prestige, physical strength, and the absence of menstruation, childbirth, and menopause. Men, on the other hand, envied women for their physical attractiveness, ease of seduction, ability to perform traditionally female tasks, and motherhood."Also why a huge number of trans men are vocal about how shocking the switch is when they started "passing", and/or how many decide to detransition entirely after passing. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/24 07:24 AM |
| 3 | US urges Ukraine to lower fighting age to 18 for males only to bolster ranks against Russia. OP: Nothing about conscripting females.Yet 0% of people who make that claim would support requiring pregnancy of those women as a similar "service to the country". Or support infertile women being drafted. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/24 12:42 AM |
| 56 | Mr. Beast's newest "challenge" video featuring a Men vs Women survival challenge was heavily rigged in the women's favorsame standards Which are often quite subjective in ranger school. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/24 10:39 AM |
| 11 | Why do boys lag behind girls at all ages of education? MPs to Investigate "The Education Committee has launched a new inquiry into why boys consistently underperform compared with girls in educational attainment across all age groups and nearly all ethnicities, and examine ways to improve outcomes."That's because the SAT, ACT, and GMAT are sexist (/s) | /r/MensRights | 01/05/24 04:29 PM |
| 95 | Why do tickets cost more for males?"Rent is 4k a month here, but we're currently offering a 75% discount for Caucasian, non-hispanic renters" Somehow I don't see this working out. There has to be something else | /r/MensRights | 11/04/24 09:32 PM |
| 3 | Seduce my flatmate ?Ok, uh, NGL I see what you mean by "not his type". Maybe this will help: I don't find you attractive. At all. HOWEVER, if you were my roommate and you just were up front and told me "hey, so... I'm horny. I'm moving out soon. How do you feel about hooking up here and there, no strings attached?" I'd say yes. | /r/seduction | 26/03/24 10:40 PM |
| 2 | #1 reason for frustrating dating livesYou shouldn't just be talking to women. Being the friendly, open person that strikes up conversation easily with men and women around you, both with people youre interested in and not, is good. Becoming the "heat seeking hot lady missile" is how you become "this weird guy who keeps talking to random women" | /r/seduction | 22/03/24 08:19 PM |
| 1 | Why is game so difficult?Anything super harmless thats just an innocent comment/just being pleasant that you'd say all the same to sweet old lady in her 70s. Waiting at a coffee shop for your order? Something relevant and true, like "haven't been here before but I think if I come again I'm gonna order what you did, that sounds great." while smiling. That's it. Most of the time it'll be obvious if they don't want to keep talking. "yeah it's good!" Then turning away or not really following up with anything else or trying … | /r/seduction | 16/02/24 06:15 PM |
| 2 | What rights do you believe a man is entitled to in this situation?Which is why it comes off as a weird thing to act like is a "gotcha" here. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/23 03:38 AM |
| 0 | What rights do you believe a man is entitled to in this situation?Can you actually give consent to the killing of another human being? Thats the whole religious/"when does life start" discussion, which I thought neither of us wanted to have Not to mention the logger didn't plan on losing his leg, whereas you have to drive to an abortion clinic. Those aren't the equivalent in their contexts. The logger didn't plan on losing his leg and the couple didn't plan on getting pregnant. The logger responded to the accident by planning a driving to a clinic specializing… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/23 01:33 AM |
| 3 | What rights do you believe a man is entitled to in this situation?Yes, and every man accepts the risk that the woman can do whatever she wants with the pregnancy after sex. I'm not seeing how acknowledging risks is related to management of results. The logger wears PPE. They also can and should seek help to get the prosthetic after an accident. Even if they werent wearing PPE. I see pregnancy the same way. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/23 12:54 AM |
| 0 | What rights do you believe a man is entitled to in this situation?I think the general consensus here is yes, it does. Not saying you for sure think this, but it sure seems like a lot of people in this thread think this is some sort of "gotcha" on people here. Really, it's just showing some very anti-abortion folks as hypocrites to think "woman should never be forced to take child to term" and "man should never have to be an unwilling parent upon discovering pregnancy" are somehow unlikely or even mutually exclusive takes. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/23 12:38 AM |
| 12 | What rights do you believe a man is entitled to in this situation?Idk if you just didn't read closely enough, but... They not only didn't say that, they addressed your point and said the opposite of what you're claiming. It's not even a long comment, so I'm not sure how you managed that. Yes, everyone knows how babies are made. Everyone also knows people can die logging. That doesn't mean a logger consented to die or shouldn't be afforded every opportunity to avoid dying. We don't just say, "Yeah, your leg got smashed between two logs on the river, and you wan… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/23 12:30 AM |
| 6 | What are some counterarguments against "women's historical oppression"?I don't have citations off the top of my head and I'm not interested in digging them up. However, I want to point out that even in my college womens history course, the professor drilled home a few points: while men were the focus of most topics we wrote about, women and men were seen as VERY different... but two halves to a whole. Different roles in life. Particularly as you go back to like ancient Mesopotamia. we always are looking back through the lens of modern society. What we value in "wes… | /r/MensRights | 16/11/23 06:50 AM |
| 12 | What's your opinion on trans (FTM) people?Law requiring you use someone's preferred pronouns, for instance. My issue with it (and I think most others too) is a fundamental one and not one specific to transgender issues. If your name is Alice and you were born a girl with XX chromosomes and present as a cis woman and want to be called a woman (i.e., like the majority of people)... I should still be able to call you a man, Andy, "dude", and whatever such pronouns and such that don't match your self identity and not face legal ramification… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 06:47 PM |
| 8 | This information is extremely important for menthe odds ratio of 1.13 for lifetime sexual partners obtained with the face-to-face mode of interview indicates that the probability of infidelity increased by 13% for every additional lifetime sexual partner (pg.150) I find it hard to believe that a person married at 19 with 3 partners prior is over 276 times less likely to cheat than a 34 year old that had a few years of casual dating and slept with 4 people a year in their 20s. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/22 09:42 PM |
| 9 | Echo chamber (with one sane person) of women encouraging wife to keep baby despite husband not being ready for the commitment."The Default should be to not have the baby" Umm, no? That would be infringing on the womans rights. I think you're misunderstanding what that person is trying to say. I don't think they're saying "woman is forced by law into not having child". I think they're saying "the default, mature decision that both potential-parents come to by talking, should be to agree that they should not have the baby if one does not want it". Hence using the word "default". Not "should not be allowed" or "made illeg… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/22 11:28 AM |
| 3 | Colleges nationwide face rapid decline in male enrollment, although ASU bucks the trendAnd you're arguing stupid semantics over legal versus colloquial use. A child is under 18 in the eyes of the (US) law. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/22 02:12 AM |
| 6 | Colleges nationwide face rapid decline in male enrollment, although ASU bucks the trendI hear that a lot and that's fantastic if that's what your hypothetical son (or anyone) wants. It can pay well and most is work that's critical to keeping our society running. But it's hard work. Physically and mentally. How many carpenters over 50 do you know that can do a full body weight squat? How many miners over 50 without lung problems? I know a good handful of tradesmen over 50 and although they might be strong or dexterous in some senses, almost all have some type of chronic, debilitati… | /r/MensRights | 08/01/22 03:16 PM |
| 5 | Colleges nationwide face rapid decline in male enrollment, although ASU bucks the trendSince you're going to get into semantics of "men" vs "males"... No. Colleges largely do admit children. At least in the US. Many (most?) college applicants are in high school and apply in the winter months. Roughly half still wouldn't be 18 by that point. I wasn't 18 until a couple weeks before my classes started. So no, colleges are admitting boys and men. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/22 03:09 PM |
| 1 | Draft women, too: If and when the military draft is reinstated, men shouldn’t be the only ones called to serveI'm still not understanding why youre mixing the issues. Or why you don't think gender equality in the draft wouldn't be a way to "abolish" it. This feminist point you're pushing ignores the reality of right now in favor of a hypothetical ideal. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/21 06:47 AM |
| 2 | Draft women, too: If and when the military draft is reinstated, men shouldn’t be the only ones called to serveI was talking beyond the US. But I agree. But I'm not following whats hard to understand about setting the precedent that it's not just a thing men should have to do. Many of my soldiers are women. They're just as capable. There's no reason our policy should be "in the unlikely but literally always possible (even if "outlawed") event that we reinstate the draft, women don't have to show up for screening for duty fitness" | /r/MensRights | 02/12/21 04:29 AM |
| 3 | Draft women, too: If and when the military draft is reinstated, men shouldn’t be the only ones called to serveBut that's irrelevant. Not only could there be scenarios where a draft is critical to a nation's survival which far outweighs "we signed law that it's illegal" (and would just nullify it), the framework of it is what matters more. It doesn't matter how unlikely it is, it can come back. It's like writing a clause that your shareholders get money before lenders if your company goes bankrupt "just for fun because it wont happen". | /r/MensRights | 01/12/21 10:48 PM |
| 3 | Amazing Pittsburgh College Response to Bloodstained Men ProtestSo by your logic your parents owned you by right of "I gave you life" and the government should've not intervened had they decided "we want to beat this little shit to death"... Otherwise that's "government interference"? Definitely a troll or someone that has a podcast on loop reminding them to breathe. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/21 03:11 PM |
| 0 | Be a good Man.No. All around failure to actually respond to my comment. Are you reading what you wrote or just responding to argue? I'll make it easy for you. You literally, specifically, asked for an example. A link. I provided you with one where the upvoted comments support these ideas (which you're conveniently ignoring). What else could you possibly reasonably ask for to demonstrate this? Nothing. And that's why you asked for it. I have to imagine that's why what you asked for is no longer enough/worth re… | /r/MensRights | 10/10/21 03:08 PM |
| -1 | Be a good Man.Sorry forgot to go back and paste the link. It's there now. This whole comment is quite a response from someone that had literally nothing to reference. It makes the quotes you're being pedantic with make no sense both because you had nothing to reference and when you now do. Such as "majority of comments" and "some of the comments". No shit Sherlock - some of the comments will be worded generally and some will go into specific detail about people's worth due to their sex partners. They are all … | /r/MensRights | 09/10/21 11:43 PM |
| -2 | Be a good Man.Sure. Here's a recent post. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q4m5bh/do_you_think_the_red_pill_is_unhealthy_and_if_so The majority of upvoted comments push and support the "red pill" idea. While this can mean a lot of different things to many people, some of the comments detail things pretty clearly. Like one that talks about how women are less desirable as they age, are worth less if they have lots of sex, etc. I've been around here for most of the last decade. This place has grown a… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/21 11:02 PM |
| 7 | Amazing Pittsburgh College Response to Bloodstained Men ProtestThis is just a dumb troll, right? For context: this idiot/troll saying this stuff is MtF trans and maybe they're more inclined to feel a little differently on the subject of a parent having parts of their child's genitals cut. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/21 09:57 PM |
| 7 | Amazing Pittsburgh College Response to Bloodstained Men ProtestI'd ask if you realize there are differences between ear piercings and circumcision (reversibility, danger, etc) but you're either just a troll or next-level-stupid. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/21 09:52 PM |
| 1 | Should men have rights when it comes to abortion?Looks like people didn't follow this. Mysteriously, 1 day ago, a bunch of comments (that look like they're from people that frequent here) a bunch of new comments were made... Hmm. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 06:06 PM |
| 1 | Girl defends creep , couldn't resist myselfI don't take issue with your overall point but a simple wiki shows what you're saying is a real misrepresentation of fact https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_rights_in_the_United_States#:~:text=The%201828%20presidential%20election%20was,of%20universal%20white%20male%20suffrage. Most states got rid of land ownership requirement in mid 1820s | /r/PussyPassDenied | 12/02/21 02:36 AM |
| 2 | A typical FDS poster and the proper responseTop 1% in america is annual like $500k average. Idk what kind of home they got or how far it set the parents behind, but I have to imagine that they're close to 1% if not in it. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/01/21 06:39 AM |
| 1 | Entitled Amy gets a swift answer.One of the other current top posts is about "what if all women just stopped using dating apps?" The post says it's created a warped view to see all women as disposable and things to be used. Women as disposable. The lack of connection to reality is actually astonishing. Hell, I agree with the sentiment that we all see people as more "disposable" because of them (but is that even bad? We should be exposed to more people!). But even my most feminist, man-hating, world-is-unfair-to-women friends se… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/05/20 09:36 PM |
| -1 | the hypocrisy of womenI wouldn't say misogynistic but it became much less about "going their own way" and much more "staying salty about past relationships". Most of what's on the front page at any given time shows this, and my comments asking for more content "like this" (on self-focused posts) generally were always with ire and negative karma. Too bad, cause i could've used it post-breakup. But i made do without. Edit: and here it starts. I don't think these dumbasses realize they're being counterproductive and pro… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/05/20 07:29 AM |
| 2 | Honk HonkI wasn't until a couple months ago. Like any sub, some posts are fantastic and some (that get just as much praise) really suck. I've been here for more of the self-focused posts, kinda like this one. Posts about finding happiness in yourself, etc. Theyre relevant regardless of committing to a relationship with somebody else. Personally, I can't stand the posts that are basically "all woman bad, be real man and live in cave on own". While I understand that's what some people need after a breakup … | /r/MGTOW | 22/10/19 02:58 PM |
| 4 | "If you like a girl and want her to date you, go talk to some other girls"I think it's important to see at least 1 other person, regardless of what they're doing. It helps you not conflate "I want this person" with "I want a person"... Which is really easy to do, especially if you're having sex. | /r/seduction | 17/09/19 10:40 PM |
| 2 | Should I call? I got a match on bumble a couple of days ago. Talking through the app went really very, very sexual. Got her number and made plans for this Friday. The problem was she never agreed to an official time. Should I call today to set up a permanent time and place for the date?To me, calling does come off as confident.... But only once you've been on a date or two. When they've heard your voice in person. Before that, she's gonna feel nervous and wonder why youre calling and immediately default to feelkng like it's just too much too early. | /r/seduction | 07/09/19 02:25 AM |
| 12 | Should I call? I got a match on bumble a couple of days ago. Talking through the app went really very, very sexual. Got her number and made plans for this Friday. The problem was she never agreed to an official time. Should I call today to set up a permanent time and place for the date?It's overly intrusive and pushy. A text can be responded to at your leisure. It's like arriving at someone's house and leaving a note with their butler to get around to. It shows that you're not desperate enough to need their attention and info RIGHT NOW with something not actually urgent. Calling is like arriving at that person's house and pounding on the door, yelling "HEY! I'M HERE. IDC WHAT YOU'RE DOING, ANSWER ME NOOOOW!" ... Comes off as clingy and way too pushy when it's not critical info… | /r/seduction | 06/09/19 03:35 AM |
| 3 | Pffft, after a recent post I went into gender critical to argue and within an hour got banned from participation, these cunts are something else.Maybe you were just downvoted because... That wasn't the actual consensus? | /r/PussyPass | 23/08/19 02:07 AM |
| -4 | Anon is SAVAGEI mean, the vast majority of comments in this sub belabor the point that women are bad etc etc. Which is fine, whatever. But it does get old after a while when so many posts and comments are much less often "Men Going Their Own Way" than "Women Are The Worst Ever". And posts calling that out are a "karma gamble" - often downvoted heavily, but sometimes very upvoted. Edit: case in point. Not that I care if a bunch of vapid cunts downvote my posts, it just reminds me to not take anything on the in… | /r/MGTOW | 10/07/19 01:31 AM |
| 0 | Anon is SAVAGEStill, this is absolutely not what i would've thought would be the top comment here | /r/MGTOW | 10/07/19 01:18 AM |
| 3 | Instathot shows off "her new car"...I understand that. Thats why I feel people that aren't in that stage need to be posting more of the "stoicism" posts. For the record i didn't downvote you, sorry man | /r/MGTOW | 04/07/19 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Instathot shows off "her new car"...Sure. But I thought this would be more like /r/stoicism with lots of posts specifically about the great things men are doing and how they're going their own way, with a little bit of justified complaining about women. I like that content and that's why I'm subbed. Instead it feels like a person a little too obsessed with their ex that just keeps posting about they're "over that" and "so glad to be done" on social media... Constantly.... Well after the breakup | /r/MGTOW | 04/07/19 06:06 PM |
| -3 | Instathot shows off "her new car"...Read the comments in original post. Usually you get VW marked keys as spares. My cousin got one so I'll ask to confirm Besides, wtf does this have to do with MGTOW? For a sub about men going their own way we sure have lots of posts about women even when it has very little to do with men. | /r/MGTOW | 04/07/19 05:34 PM |
| 27 | Reminder that she is NEVER yours!Lol this is some bad understanding of STDs or lots of assumptions. STDs can have low transmission rates and no symptoms. I had one for about a year before I knew, and I only found out because I screen annually regardless. He might not have gotten it for years. Or he may not have had symptoms for years. But yeah actually let's just jump on the "LOL CUCK" train, that's more fun and the reddit way | /r/MGTOW | 04/07/19 10:29 AM |
| 2 | I'm deleting Google Chrome and stopping use of all their productstrained to play games perfectly in less than 2 weeks. Nitpicking here, but that's not exactly what deepmind did. There were very specific parameters. Not to take away from how impressive it was, but its dominance in SC2 over TLO and MaNa was misrepresented | /r/MGTOW | 03/07/19 06:41 PM |
| 1 | CareerAt age 55, Kelly because her body isn't broken from doing a trade profession for her living. Seriously its great to feel good and about your job and all but this recent pushback (last 10 years) for how good "trade school jobs" are aren't 1) well-informed and 2) are setting some people up for failure Plus wtf does this have to do with MTGOW | /r/MGTOW | 13/06/19 06:28 PM |
| 5 | Do hit pieces by feminists to take away a man's personal space still have a place in 2019?I also hear no mention of the practical "masculine" gifts. "Gee, a lawn mower? Gee, thanks - I'm so glad I'm so much so the only person that does yard work, you thought it would be a present for ME for us to have a new one!" Some men would be thrilled. Some men love yard work. The problem isn't that the practical, house-contribution gifts are common. The problem is those users bitching about it as if it's something that only happens to women. It's a case-by-case situation and doesn't take into a… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/19 05:54 PM |
| 5 | When a girl asks for a ride home............Sometimes theres great posts here. But without context, this isn't one of them. Sure, maybe shes clearly been trying to use him in the past. But for someone in your contacts, OP clearly is either 1) still falling for her shit, or 2) just a douchebag about simply being asked for a ride. | /r/MGTOW | 10/06/19 11:10 PM |
| 1 | An interesting titleWell, you're right about one thing: "Those numbers don't mean anything". 2 MILLION innocent, civilian deaths in Vietnam? 460,000 in Iraq? Those numbers are more than double total deaths to include civilians and soldiers on both sides. I refuse to believe someone can be so lazy and misinformed in backing up their batshit-insane beliefs. Even if you're not a troll (which I doubt at this point), you're not worth more discussion. Main reason I'm even typing this out is to acknowledge how off-base yo… | /r/MGTOW | 10/06/19 05:39 AM |
| 1 | An interesting titleYou can celebrate or criticize the reasons for war separately from those fighting in it. The hardships endured, for whatever reason, even certain training, is what soldiers often bond over - and it's why soldiers from different countries often feel a bond with one another. That plus your comment shows how out of touch you are with actual conflict. It's literally a small handful that do anything like that. | /r/MGTOW | 09/06/19 05:04 PM |
| 7 | 🙄😒What country do you live in? It doesn't work that way in the US. The government will require both parents to support the child unless both parents avoid ever getting the government involved - which includes never applying for government subsidies like low income housing, state-subsidized healthcare, or food stamps. | /r/MGTOW | 07/06/19 09:51 AM |
| 93 | Well playedRight? Depends on the context obviously. But id have to know the situation more to really feel one way or another about it with certainty. Edit: for example, I could easily see him having said "hey want a drink?" Or "I'll get you one" And technically he's right that he didnt say "I'll buy you a drink" but obviously that sounds like a "prank" 12 year old boys pull on each other. "LOL I asked if you wanted me to get you food at the concession stand - I didn't say Id buy it!" OTOH, could totally se… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/19 11:45 PM |
| 1 | I'm glad I live in an advanced societyNor can student loans. She'll truly owe every dime if that happens | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/05/19 01:31 PM |
| 1 | Big fact.While I agree with this, I do think there would need to be a trial to prove the accuser lied too. Finding the accused innocent doesn't necessarily mean they didn't do it - just that it wasn't beyond a reasonable doubt (under US law at least) I know that view might get hate here, but i think that's a fair middle ground. | /r/MGTOW | 18/05/19 10:26 PM |
| 0 | Double standardsNothing other than point out how ridiculous both your equivalence and response are. The double standard is blatantly obvious and there's plenty of better examples. Making that comparison is counterproductive to change, and frankly stupid. | /r/MGTOW | 28/03/19 06:42 AM |
| 0 | Double standardsWhile it doesn't excuse her behavior... Did you seriously just compare standards for a musician to that of someone trying to become a supreme court justice? | /r/MGTOW | 28/03/19 06:37 AM |
| 2 | I’ll add to the list and you guys can add in the comments. Single mother - no dick Won’t pay her half - no dick Claims to be nawalt - no dick Expects you to do everything - no dick Drinks/smokes and parties a lot - no dick Claims to be feminist/liberal - no dickBut then it's not just a problem with women, which seems to be the tone here. | /r/MGTOW | 27/03/19 01:44 AM |
| 3 | I’ll add to the list and you guys can add in the comments. Single mother - no dick Won’t pay her half - no dick Claims to be nawalt - no dick Expects you to do everything - no dick Drinks/smokes and parties a lot - no dick Claims to be feminist/liberal - no dickI don't understand some of this sub's stances on things. Sometimes I see complaining about women choosing abortions, sometimes I see posts like this complaining about single mothers. Can't have both. | /r/MGTOW | 27/03/19 01:24 AM |
| 1 | r/TwoXChromosomes user admits to assaulting a childStandards are becoming gender-neutral now. And getting drafted doesn't mean you go to combat roles. Youd get screened beforehand and deemed fit for certain types of service. | /r/PussyPass | 16/03/19 05:44 PM |
| 10 | Damn RightSpeculative. How do you know the former caused the latter and not vice versa? | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 03:41 AM |
| 6 | Rape allegation by British woman who faced being jailed for 'extra-marital sex' with two men in Dubai is THROWN OUT by police after video shows 'consent of the three parties'The idea behind it is to protect the accused for that exact reason. That people could be taken to court, particularly by rich and powerful people, and they would disappear from public eye with no discussion until it's too late. I don't know how to approach it, but it's not an easy issue to tackle. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/16 11:29 PM |
| 4 | Infants prefer toys typed to their gender, says studyThis is low quality for this sub. Not sure what this has to do with men's rights and the comments here show pretty poor analysis. From the study's abstract: Many studies have found that a majority of boys and girls prefer to play with toys that are typed to their own gender but there is still uncertainty about the age at which such sex differences first appear, and under what conditions Further on in the abstract, and most importantly: Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed with … | /r/MensRights | 19/07/16 06:58 PM |
| 1 | Men's bathroom and Women's bathroom in my office.I've been arguing with davidbyron2 on here for over a year. He's a moron that embodies the feminist stereotype of us. There's really no arguing with him. Downvote and move on. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/15 08:14 PM |
| 3 | Obama announces new "women and children first" immigration policy: freedom for undocumented women, jail for undocumented men.They're allowed to run. They do run. What needs to change is the voting system - FPTP will over time always result in 2 parties due primarily to the spoiler effect. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/15 05:35 PM |
| 1 | Woman bartender refuses to serve male patron because of what he's wearing and/or beliefs. So can he sue for $135,000 like the gay couple did because the baker refused to bake them a cake or...?Yup, the echo in here is getting louder with each passing year. Pointing out something that someone did is legal, even if most here don't agree with it, is karmasuicide. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/15 07:39 PM |
| 1 | Woman bartender refuses to serve male patron because of what he's wearing and/or beliefs. So can he sue for $135,000 like the gay couple did because the baker refused to bake them a cake or...?Believing in inciting violence is okay. Wearing a shirt/holding posters inciting violence is not. See the difference? | /r/MensRights | 22/07/15 07:37 PM |
| 1 | Florida FSU QB is charged with assault and battery for punching a girl who kicked and punched him attacking him FIRST,even after trying to restrain her raised fist. He has been charged with assault and battery, suspended indefinitely..local laws Technically state laws, effectively national law, of one of the biggest countries in the world in both size and population. Unsure how or why you classify it as "weird local law" sporting career He signed a contract to play in the NCAA agreeing to not break laws like being drunk underage in public. Neither of us said it excused assault. But you disagreeing with us saying he shouldn't have been there is just stupidity. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/15 11:52 PM |
| 1 | Florida FSU QB is charged with assault and battery for punching a girl who kicked and punched him attacking him FIRST,even after trying to restrain her raised fist. He has been charged with assault and battery, suspended indefinitely..Only people people shown they're entitled to special privileges would display aggression towards someone to prevent a fight when both parties know that person won't win. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/15 08:36 PM |
| 1 | Florida FSU QB is charged with assault and battery for punching a girl who kicked and punched him attacking him FIRST,even after trying to restrain her raised fist. He has been charged with assault and battery, suspended indefinitely..He's 19. He shouldn't have been in a bar. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/15 08:33 PM |
| 2 | why do people upvote shit like thisAn admirable, yet forever small and token group that will always be marginalized by the mainstream. Thanks for your insight Nostradamus. So has been said of every group, ever. And so it shall continue to be. Funny thing, collectivists afraid of "social and career suicide" are the least likely people to ever change anything. No shit. Said-people pave the way for people to be okay standing on the National Mall listening to MLK. They're not going to be MLK. I'm actually not complaining about anythi… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/15 10:52 PM |
| 4 | why do people upvote shit like thisYou think complaining on Reddit will do anything? Yes. More people talking about this shit equates to more people feeling comfortable talking about it off the internet - which anyone would tell you is currently almost surely social and career suicide. Complaining on Reddit will do far, far less. Yet, here you are complaining on reddit. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/15 07:19 PM |
| 2 | Eating less takes zero money and the results get you more attractive people. This whole journey is about delayed gratification. So harden the fuck up and invest in your body.I think we're stumbling over the definition of "healthy". Exactly. And even your usage of it isn't terribly appropriate. "Healthy" is a relative term. You can't just make blanket statements about a food. A Big Mac is not a terribly healthy option for John McCain. A Big Mac is a fairly healthy option for a starving child in Austria. | /r/seduction | 14/05/15 05:10 PM |
| 1 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"well now your edit makes my comment make no sense :'c | /r/MensRights | 14/05/15 03:10 AM |
| 3 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"Yes it's bad but if there is no exception for minorities or those who lack power to speak out against groups who dominate and abuse them we'll leave the door open for far more injustice Can you provide a specific example as to what you think is acceptable discrimination for me? Because right now I just don't see any situation where it's okay. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/15 09:13 PM |
| 3 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"I still feel like that's a little shy of what I think is important: Call it what you want, but discriminating against groups of people is bad, period. "Sexism", "reverse sexism", "evening the score", "fighting against the patriarchy"... it's bad. The people that say "I'm not a __ist" seem to imply that their actions/beliefs aren't bad because of how they define said-actions/beliefs | /r/MensRights | 12/05/15 08:37 PM |
| 1 | "The Manbod fad is sexist and misgynistic!"Fiber technically contains calories. Sort of. Insoluble = effectively 0, soluble = 4 Personally, I do not find fiber filling I have a hard time believing your brain is wired to perceive hunger differently than everyone else (outside of placebo). So if I had to guess, it's probably because you're consuming mostly insoluble fiber. Soluble fiber is what gives you the sensation of being full. Try oatmeal. Eat 3 big bowls, then tell me you're not hungry :) Side note: It's not actually terribly hard t… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/15 08:29 PM |
| 6 | "The Manbod fad is sexist and misgynistic!"Fiber is much better for if you're trying to lose weight. Fiber is filling, and isn't a macronutrient - which means no calories. edit: to clarify, this is of insoluble fiber, which makes up the majority of fiber content in almost every food Oats, beans, and vegetables in general are your BFFs. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/15 08:17 PM |
| 2 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"Some say she has so much gas tenure, the mere thought of firing her causes people to pass out from the anticipated smell. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/15 08:05 PM |
| 3 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"The thing I've never understood about the whole "__ism = bigotry + power" is that someone who says "I'm not a __ist" implies that, therefore, their actions/beliefs are justified. If a bisexual aboriginal transsexual is calling for violence and policies to harm straight white men - call it what you want. But insinuating it's not a bad thing is asinine. Sidenote: so... according to their rules, anyone who presents themselves as an average, typical man could just walk in and say "I don't identify a… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/15 07:55 PM |
| 2 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do"So that essay was all about your dissection/offense to being called condescending? Again... you're calling me belligerent and psychotic? You don't have to claim superiority to be condescending. It can be implied which it very clearly was (and continues to be) by your tone. Though now you're explicit in doing so. You belong on /r/iamverysmart | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 08:22 AM |
| 2 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do""The earth isn't 6000 years old because you're stupid" is completely ad hominem. It doesn't address the argument (Which wasn't even an argument because your straw man didn't have evidence to substantiate its proposition.) and the material of the rebuttal is entirely a personal attack. No shit? That's exactly what I said. You clearly didn't actually read my comment. as belligerent and psychotic as you appear to be in your posts Saying I'm "belligerent and psychotic" based on my posts is ironic co… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 08:01 AM |
| 2 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do"I literally reiterated my point on what we're discussing. You didn't address it in your first response, or the one you just gave. Telling me "I have no rebuttal" by makes absolutely no sense. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 07:46 AM |
| 3 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do"Not even going to bother addressing most of that. Your entire post is just more of the same. Perhaps against better judgement, I'll at least try once more to get one point in your head. You don't know what an ad hominem is. I thought I laid it out pretty clearly, but apparently not. In addition to calling one's personal character into question, an ad hominem necessitates one of the following: not addressing the original argument phrase being directly related to their ability to make an argument … | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 07:41 AM |
| 5 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do"I'm not entirely sure. Poe's law and all. Some people truly are both fucking stupid and try to display their fucking stupidity by arguing with people. Plus, they have a few thousand comment karma. edit: 2600+ karma for one comment - and even that was just a joke/insult. So negative karma if you take that one out. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 07:00 AM |
| 1 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do"You can have a rational discussion and also insult someone. I'll make it clear for you: Situation 1) Person A: The Earth is 6,000 years old. Person B: No it's not, because you're fucking stupid. Situation 2) Person A: The earth is 6,000 years old Person B: You're fucking stupid for being 43 years old and still not having taken a bit of time to learn some basic science. We can estimate the age of the Earth for a multitude.... Situation 1 is not rational and is just insulting. Situation 2 is ratio… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 06:56 AM |
| 5 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do"Have you considered the possibility that everyone else is calm, and you're just wrong? I agree that things like this shouldn't be posted about issues that aren't yet "gendered" too heavily. If you think of a cancer victim, more people might think of women, but not an absolutelyoverwhelming majority. There, I wouldn't condone making posters that turn it into a "gendered topic". But domestic violence? Ask 10,000 people what they first picture, and I'd be surprised if less than 9,900 thought immedi… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 06:48 AM |
| 6 | I made a poster on gender symmetry in domestic violence: "A Woman Can Do Anything a Man Can Do""Yeah, /u/sweetiepiejonas - there would only be 25 men out of a randomly selected group that have been victims of violence by their SO - that's much better than the 33 women! Man up! Regardless, it's not like men's statistics might be lower because even fewer men than women realize they're being abused. And we certainly don't classify rape in a way that any sane person would think it would obviously skew statistics." Not sure if you're a troll/fuckwit or just that unconcerned about human sufferi… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/15 06:39 AM |
| 1 | How do you get a 50% female student body from a far below 50% female pool of qualified applicants without gender discrimination? Tip: you can't.You're moving the goalposts. Your original comment: feminists argue 50% is not half. Your new statement: They say 50% but I have more than enough reason to think it still isn't equal. Saying it isn't equal isn't saying it isn't 50%. Worse than being wrong, your attempts at trying to re-frame your statement is flat-out disingenuous. This is the last straw though. I'm done with this subreddit. Years back when it was made up of people such as /u/typhonblue and /u/girlwriteswhat, there were real dis… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 09:53 PM |
| -8 | How do you get a 50% female student body from a far below 50% female pool of qualified applicants without gender discrimination? Tip: you can't.How is this a helpful or relevant comment? It's clearly not a mainstream idea that "50% isn't half". Comments like this are why we aren't taken seriously in trying to address issues. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 03:29 AM |
| 1 | #WhoWillYouHelp Canadian campaign that villianizes ALL men.Can you cite that study please? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 01:46 AM |
| 1 | Feminist Wikipedia administrator trying to delete the "Violence Against Men" article on Wikipedia.Nobody responded to all of that that you took the time to write. So... I just want to say, thank you. For both the time and the insight. While I don't agree with every word, most seems frighteningly descriptive and reasonable. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/15 02:56 AM |
| 1 | Feminist Wikipedia administrator trying to delete the "Violence Against Men" article on Wikipedia.Exactly. Trans people was the focus of the comment though, as they regularly have their gender identification invalidated. So I'd just hope that's the case. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/15 12:05 AM |
| 0 | Feminist Wikipedia administrator trying to delete the "Violence Against Men" article on Wikipedia.As long as lesbian, bisexual, and trans women are categorized with women, and gay, bisexual, and trans men are categorized as men, I'm fully behind that. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/15 11:26 PM |
| 2 | How do you argue for men's rights when the internet is full of articles like this?That implies that people were to look over her writing history (of which I have not). I've literally never heard of her until today, or at least I don't recall her name, and I doubt most people that would discuss that article with you would know much about her either. Therefore, if someone agrees with her one article they've read from her - they're unlikely to listen much at all to what you have to say after calling her a "hateful sexist bigot". I agree 100% with /u/rbbrks on this. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/15 08:25 PM |
| 1 | Found in my girlfriend's dormCould you site your source on the California law please? I looked but couldn't find anything. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/15 07:51 PM |
| 1 | A girl was offput by my quick interest, shut me down, and I shut her back down. 1 week later shes crawling back. A good lesson.In the original argument, there was no romantic relationship and no sexual intimacy was shared. There was a romantic relationship. Just because it's in its infancy and there isn't commitment at that point doesn't make it not a romance. So... at the core of your argument, the amount of time the relationship was previously makes one either a reasonable person or an asshole? Bullshit. | /r/seduction | 04/02/15 03:06 AM |
| 1 | A girl was offput by my quick interest, shut me down, and I shut her back down. 1 week later shes crawling back. A good lesson.That was my first question. The second one that you didn't answer was if she didn't cheat on me. | /r/seduction | 04/02/15 01:08 AM |
| 1 | A girl was offput by my quick interest, shut me down, and I shut her back down. 1 week later shes crawling back. A good lesson.I'm a bi man. I love both women and men for who they are. You didn't answer my question. If my hypothetical wife and I divorce, am I misogynist asshole for not wanting to see her anymore? | /r/seduction | 03/02/15 07:51 PM |
| 1 | A girl was offput by my quick interest, shut me down, and I shut her back down. 1 week later shes crawling back. A good lesson.How about the emotional state of the individual who's friendship is being rejected? Or do you think rejection of sexual advances is more important than rejection of friendship? I'm not saying the rejecting person wouldn't feel bad. So your solution is to say "Too bad, Rejected - the other person is entitled to your platonic friendship because you like them." A ridiculous false dichotomy. You're using that term wrong. I'd recommend that the next time you refer someone to a term in a snide manner … | /r/seduction | 03/02/15 06:52 PM |
| 1 | A girl was offput by my quick interest, shut me down, and I shut her back down. 1 week later shes crawling back. A good lesson.I don't know why you seem so insistent on ignoring the emotional state of the rejected. Maybe taking it to the extreme will help break through the obvious personal baggage you're bringing to this discussion: If I'm married to a woman and my wife has an affair with another man, we get divorced, and she moves in with the new man but ex-wife still wants to talk... Am I still a mysoginist asshole to not want to spend time with her because I feel like shit being around her? | /r/seduction | 03/02/15 08:25 AM |
| 1 | A girl was offput by my quick interest, shut me down, and I shut her back down. 1 week later shes crawling back. A good lesson.That's not a fair assessment. Why is the person that's offering the friendship entitled to a friendship? That's not just unfair - That's bullshit. The rejected has a right to protect their feelings and not lead themselves on. To say that's trumped by the rejecting person being entitled to their friendship or that the rejected must have other reasons is misguided or asinine. | /r/seduction | 03/02/15 03:12 AM |
| 1 | A girl was offput by my quick interest, shut me down, and I shut her back down. 1 week later shes crawling back. A good lesson.Try to think of it with genders reversed. I'll assume you're a guy for this example: You start seeing a woman - it was always with romantic intent, we weren't good friends beforehand. After a few weeks, you decide it wasn't going to work out. You offer her friendship because you think she's cool but aren't interested in anything more. Is it misandry for her to say no? HELL NO. So why the fuck is it misogyny when genders are reversed? | /r/seduction | 02/02/15 11:57 PM |
| 9 | "25 Invisible benefits of being Anita Sarkeesian"Especially when considering he posts in /r/batman | /r/MensRights | 01/02/15 08:15 PM |
| 1 | NSW police not all bad after allIt was written as a response to "it's wrong to hit anyone" without a clause "in addition" or anything similar. When responding to someone in English without using a phrase like that, the connotation is that you disagree because [insert point being made]. I stand by my assertion that that's what implied, even if that's not what he/she meant. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/15 07:56 PM |
| -1 | NSW police not all bad after allI hope you realize you're implying (by your reply to /u/the_painted_man) that you think it's a better idea to hit back than call the police. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/15 09:01 AM |
| 2 | Great post from /r/4chan about SJWsExactly. I'm not sure why people aren't getting this. All you said was that if you go to a liberal area you'll find many SJW's because they are all liberal. If you live in Oklahoma City, the likelihood of you running into SJWs is much lower than San Francisco. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 09:02 PM |
| 1 | Great post from /r/4chan about SJWsYou're missing the point. /u/Arakin was simply saying that if you go to a liberal area - you'll find many more SJWs than elsewhere. That's it. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 08:59 PM |
| 1 | Great post from /r/4chan about SJWsHe/she said nothing about liberals being bad. All that was said is that you'll run into SJW's in liberal towns/cities all the time. You can be liberal and not a SJW, but you can't really be a SJW and not liberal. Hence going to a very liberal area you'll find many. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 08:57 PM |
| 1 | The hardest truth to accept that I hope helps other guys: Stop giving women value early onStill not sure that's completely right though. It's one thing to have an "I am going to be 100% okay and she is going to be making a mistake if she doesn't say yes because I'm fucking awesome" attitude... Another to say "I literally do not care. I am apathetic". One seems honest, the other seems... well, dishonest. Or, truthfully, unhealthy. | /r/seduction | 10/09/14 10:57 AM |
| 1 | What happens when we all hit the same level of attractiveness?Perhaps just focus on enjoying it? If you feel you're already at a superb level, I'd maybe put more energy into other things in your life. Learn how to do something new, devote time to a hobby... etc | /r/seduction | 05/09/14 12:32 AM |
| 3 | What It Means to Be A Man With WomenSolid points. Was slightly concerned I'd need to comment on the "understand what no means" section, saying it was getting into rape-y territory... but you cleared that up :) | /r/seduction | 05/09/14 12:31 AM |
| 2 | When has seduction advice not worked for you?Ohh. I've always assumed it was spelled Aussie, or maybe some variant - but at least starting with the letter A. I assumed that you were some well-known person that posts here that I just didn't know about, or that you were Mr. Osbourne :P | /r/seduction | 04/09/14 06:22 PM |
| 1 | When has seduction advice not worked for you?I agree mostly with 1 and 3, but 2 I think you may just not have tuned into yet. It's a very fine line. You need to try to convey that you're a little bit more interested in her - that she's not just one of many that will have to fight for you. Give her the feeling (but not absolute confidence) that if she wanted to go home with you, she could. But the flip-side of that is showing that there are also other women interested in you that you'd be happy with as well. While you prefer her, you could … | /r/seduction | 04/09/14 02:09 PM |
| 1 | No motivation to k-close, please helpI think you're thinking of it wrong. If you don't want to have sex, or escalate at all... then just... don't? It's also possible you're somewhat asexual, and it's just coming out now. Nothing wrong with that if that's the case. Given that this is the first time it's happened, you'd probably need to feel similarly with a couple of others before I'd say it's likely.. but it's something worth mentioning. | /r/seduction | 04/09/14 01:51 PM |
| 2 | When has seduction advice not worked for you?Ozzie? .....Osbourne? | /r/seduction | 04/09/14 05:12 AM |
| 7 | The "starting strength" of seductionThe best advice I have for making friends (applies to picking up women too): Do what you would do if you already had a bunch of friends (or "had the perfect woman"). You'll naturally end up bonding with people who share interests with you... boom. The caveat to this is that you have to be at least moderately comfortable with yourself and not desperate to make a friend. | /r/seduction | 04/09/14 04:50 AM |
| 0 | Ho gets dumped by boyfriend of ~1 year for having too many previous sex partners; hamster seeks comfort from hamstersThe latter, and it was years ago. edit: I can feel the butthurt from here. Downvoted for answering a question? Alright children. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/08/14 02:49 PM |
| 0 | Ho gets dumped by boyfriend of ~1 year for having too many previous sex partners; hamster seeks comfort from hamstersTell me, what are the odds, that after 50 guys she fucked and moved past, you're finally "the one". There has to be reason. Is the logical answer that you are inherently more special and better than them? That its true love. Circumventing the issue. If it were 50 one night stands and then me, an LTR? 50 relationships, then me? Two different scenarios - stick to the topic. (For the record, she was in the porn industry for a bit). The mentality that leads a woman to go through those men and settle… | /r/TheRedPill | 27/08/14 08:28 PM |
| -5 | Ho gets dumped by boyfriend of ~1 year for having too many previous sex partners; hamster seeks comfort from hamstersAgain, you're circumventing the issue. I never said that biological reasons tell men that slutty women are unattractive. I said that it is not rational and logical in this day and age because all potential downsides can be easily addressed today. We have STD tests. We have pregnancy tests. Notice that you had to change your assertion to say "accepting how that how I feel is emotional, is rational (right guys?...)" So I'll say it again: Ifshe passes those tests with "negative", the argument again… | /r/TheRedPill | 27/08/14 03:15 PM |
| -4 | Ho gets dumped by boyfriend of ~1 year for having too many previous sex partners; hamster seeks comfort from hamstersBefore you try to come up with a witty one line retort, you would be wise to bring your assertion to conclusion. If she wasn't clean, I would know. I have been tested twice. How did I know she was clean? Her line of work had her get tested every few weeks. I am right to lecture you on how the reason you're upset about many partners is essentially exclusively an emotional one. Not very TRP-like. | /r/TheRedPill | 27/08/14 02:21 PM |
| -8 | Ho gets dumped by boyfriend of ~1 year for having too many previous sex partners; hamster seeks comfort from hamstersYou're missing the point in your emotional scramble for rationalization. I never said it had to be attractive - you can find hundreds of partners unattractive. That's your prerogative. However, don't act like you're the voice of logic and reason on this topic as it pertains today. If she is: Not pregnant STD free It doesn't matter pragmatically. It just doesn't. I didn't take TRP to be a place to cry and whine about "but my feels say it's worse - even though it doesn't really matter!" ... making… | /r/TheRedPill | 27/08/14 02:08 PM |
| -30 | Ho gets dumped by boyfriend of ~1 year for having too many previous sex partners; hamster seeks comfort from hamstersNot me. I dated a girl that had ~50 partners and was clean. And guess what? She was good at sex. She was experienced. The number of penises that had been in her before didn't matter. "But she may have been looser" So you're telling me that a woman with 100 one night stands would be viewed the same by you as a woman who only had sex with 1 man, but did daily for 4 years? That's 100 dickin's vs 1400 dickin's. I can agree with some red pill ideas, but you're just fucking morons when it comes to thi… | /r/TheRedPill | 27/08/14 06:06 AM |
| 13 | Has anyone watched 500 days of Summer?You touched on a really interesting point with that movie, which I'd like to expand on: This movie is like a goddamn relationship-Rorschach-test. Different people see the movie in such different ways. Some, like your ex (and mine) love the movie and see it just as you described. Some, like myself when I first watched the movie - I saw the main male character as an ideal boyfriend who just needed Summer (the main female) to realize it. I now see their relationship as a really unhealthy one where … | /r/seduction | 23/08/14 12:45 PM |
| 1 | Conversing with shitty personalitiesJust FYI, it's "woe is me" not "whoa as me" :) Agree with your post though. | /r/seduction | 22/08/14 07:50 AM |
| 2 | How do you prevent girls from perceiving you as too rich.I'm going to assume that those occupations don't make a great salary? I wouldn't know about knife sharpener. Regardless, yes, for sure. That's not at all contrary to what I was saying. My point, if I could refine it, would be that OP starting a small business was doing nothing more than making a good investment. You, on the other hand, were taking a big risk and it paid off. If you failed... you would have hit the ground much harder. And therefore - the less money you "come from", the less likel… | /r/seduction | 22/08/14 07:29 AM |
| 3 | How do you prevent girls from perceiving you as too rich.I'd also add this point, because a lot of rich folk don't understand this: I know a number of people in their early 20's that are running small businesses and earn money in stocks. And they all take a lot of credit for earning their own money. But would you have that if you came from even a middle-upper class family? Doubtful. A lower class family? I'd say with almost 100% certainty you would not have tried to start a small business - let alone 2. MIGHT you have been able to? Absolutely. But the… | /r/seduction | 21/08/14 11:43 AM |
| 1 | Held eyes with a girl on the train today and...Great! That's all one can ask for :) Carry on, brother. | /r/seduction | 20/08/14 12:19 AM |
| 3 | Some theory for those who have trouble taking action.You're the kind of person that screams at children deathly afraid of the water that the only way to get better at swimming is to get in and swim. No shit. But not everyone can just take that step. For some people, intermediate steps are needed. OP's post is one suggestion as a way to get to the point of getting out there. | /r/seduction | 19/08/14 11:45 PM |
| 8 | Held eyes with a girl on the train today and...We're not laughing at you. You're getting way too defensive. Like the others said - relax. Laugh. If you can't laugh at that, you'll never get over your AA. | /r/seduction | 19/08/14 11:37 PM |
| 4 | [FR] Summer date night. Easy and successful I'd say - very detailed.This. And asking her out "for drinks" ... then not getting drinks "because she's under 21"? Lol. | /r/seduction | 31/07/14 12:16 PM |
| 1 | "Only 18% of Domestic Abuse is Reported"My thoughts exactly. I'm no stranger to scientific method - I've written two theses and done a year-long study. Still, I have no idea how one could even accurately come up with the claim "only X% of Y is reported!"... if it's not reported, how do you know? Unless, of course, they're comparing anonymous surveys with legal action. Then that makes sense. But the problem is, usually (in regards to DV and rape, anyway) the statements usually read like such: "In a recent anonymous survey including 100… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/14 10:52 AM |
| 3 | Female college students who resist the feminist brainwashing they are taught have formed a student organization called NeWJust want to say, thanks for the rational discussion in this comment chain (from everyone). It's easy to get upset with people who disagree with something you're passionate about. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/14 10:45 AM |
| 1 | Female college students who resist the feminist brainwashing they are taught have formed a student organization called NeWIIRC, the last poll that was done showed something like at least 70% of the poll responders considered themselves to be "liberal". | /r/MensRights | 05/07/14 10:39 AM |
| 1 | The double standards forming in eSports now.I can agree with your first few sentences. But I take issue with a couple parts: If you want to label him something, call him transgender. He isn't a woman though. Agreed, but in this context? There's no "transgendered" tournament, let alone one for specifically born-male and born-female people. So in this context, I can't agree with you at all. Let people decide "male" or "female" in this case. Now the other part: The confusion by breaking general social axioms. Raw data can be harmed, especial… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 04:51 AM |
| 1 | A member of an opposition sub posted some interesting concerns about financial abortion. I wanted MR's thoughts.I'm glad you agree :) I think it's difficult to separate legal familial rights into categories and categorically change them while maximizing freedoms yet staying consistent and fair. Our ideas of familial rights and familial dynamics are quite ingrained at this point. Hell, there's people in our country that want to kill two women who want to be married and raise a child. If that's not indicative of a culture where family dynamics are ingrained, I'm not sure what would be. So, yes, this obvious… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 04:05 AM |
| 1 | A member of an opposition sub posted some interesting concerns about financial abortion. I wanted MR's thoughts.I think you misinterpreted what I said in the first part. I agree that what I said about how the father would have no legal right to see the child, just as a boyfriend wouldn't, is right. If he went though LPS on child A, his involvement with the child is pretty much at the mother's whim until child is 18. Even afterwards, he cannot be claimed as "father" legally speaking, ever. That was his choice, and is a life-long one. So I think we're in agreement, then? | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 03:55 AM |
| 1 | So proud of my sister-in-law, one of the most grounded, down-to-earth people I know (Next to my wife!). Her friends seem to share the same views tooI know you're addressing OP, but I want to add my two cents to add another voice so you get a good sample of what people here think: First off, I think claiming one person exploited another isn't valid unless you're claiming sexual coercion, harassment, or rape. None of which I believe she made in this specific case, but I just wanted to make that clear: if you're not going to say they actually coerced you or raped you, "exploited" is meaningless and therefore pointless. Secondly, I don't give a… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 03:43 AM |
| 3 | A member of an opposition sub posted some interesting concerns about financial abortion. I wanted MR's thoughts.Absolutely no one is advocating for men to be able to choose to have a family, and then years later walk out without paying for it. I agree with this due to the "choose to have a family" part, but not what's implied. I do advocate for the father settling with living in a family but not being legally required to do so. Let me give you an example: Father and Mother have an "oops". Father is not ready for this, and wants abortion. Mother does not. However, they both love each other dearly and want … | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 03:18 AM |
| 3 | A member of an opposition sub posted some interesting concerns about financial abortion. I wanted MR's thoughts.My thoughts are that then the father can still seek him out. If mother doesn't like that - restraining order. This would be common I'm sure, but I don't see a big problem in it. A restraining order wouldn't be tied to surrendering parental rights in my ideal world. Edit: I'd like to clarify before someone jumps on me. I wouldn't have much of an issue with LPS necessitating a restraining order. But I do think that the restraint part should be able to be revoked on the mother's request alone (fath… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 03:01 AM |
| 4 | A member of an opposition sub posted some interesting concerns about financial abortion. I wanted MR's thoughts.Writer raises a couple decent points. But I'm still 100% in favor of it. I'll go over my thoughts. I'm a product of two families which, with only 11 aunts/uncles/grandparents, there have still been 8 divorces. Yet, I'm still too ignorant on the subject to know the current precedent with many things. First, the ones that I personally have answers for: Father who doesn't stay away can have restraining order placed just as if he were a random guy. Paternal grandparents have no rights. Father can "s… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 02:50 AM |
| 2 | Birmingham School Sued Over Violation of Male Student's RightsThis is 100% speculation, don't take what I'm saying as if I think it's necessarily true... But I'm going to guess he had it because he thought the girls would think it was "cool", even though they obviously didn't. You probably can relate to that feeling: You feel something is important to you and is cool to you, especially if it's new and doing so wields some sort of power - you'd want others to know about it, right? I can see an 18-year-old kid thinking this was a good idea to show two girls … | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 02:00 AM |
| 8 | It finally happened! I've been banned from /r/feminism for this post. I guess feminists don't like it when somebody points out that their movement has a long history of advocating *against* giving support to male victims of DV.Nothing to be ashamed of - they're not you. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/14 11:26 AM |
| 1 | Men are required by law to register with selective service at age 18. Now that women are allowed in combat roles, when will they also be required to register?I've been here multiple years, but for some reason the last month or two have been rife with stupidity. Particularly the recent thread talking about how "feminism is upset about the 35' rule for protests being deemed unconstitutional". Maybe this is due to the influx from media attention received after Rodger's shooting. I don't know. But it's getting frustrating. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/14 03:13 AM |
| 0 | Feminists losing their shit that the US Supreme Court just ruled that freedom of speech applies to everybody, including people who aren't feminists (specifically abortion protesters)Yes, your freedoms are absolutely different from public to private. What's your point? That: "The point made is that publicly owned property can and does prevent people from doing things in certain areas that they otherwise can in other areas." I fail to see anything you are saying in this post worth talking about or even decipherable. I fail to see how anything I said wasn't abundantly clear and directly addressing what you said. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/14 02:31 AM |
| 1 | Feminists losing their shit that the US Supreme Court just ruled that freedom of speech applies to everybody, including people who aren't feminists (specifically abortion protesters)So what the fuck else would I not 'be immune to?' Like what are you even trying to imply? You would not be immune to things such as people not wanting to frequent your business, or people disliking you, or for a situational example: me struggling to take your arguments seriously because your comments just read like a pissed off, moody teen. It does matter. Laws governing what can and cannot happen on public vs. private property are different. Laws apply differently to public and private property… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/14 01:24 AM |
| 2 | Feminists losing their shit that the US Supreme Court just ruled that freedom of speech applies to everybody, including people who aren't feminists (specifically abortion protesters)You are not immune to consequences of how others react to what you say I am if I say a person is an idiot and they punch me. I'll start off the same way you did: "No shit". I said you're not immune - that doesn't mean you are also always 100% at fault. That's an extreme misrepresentation of what I said - a strawman. Private property vs. pubic property. Does not matter at all. Public property does not mean administrators of the property cannot have their own rules and limitations as to what is do… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/14 12:49 AM |
| 1 | TechCrunch Founder: "Unfortunately, when you have been accused of rape — even provably falsely as I have been — there’s no way to “win”. For the rest of my life, when someone searches my name on the internet, the word “rape” will appear somewhere among the results."However, defense lawyers are literally professional "nuh-uh" 'ers. There's a lot of ways around it: She didn't know she wasn't raped when she said it, so just improperly said she "lied" (ex: ex-mormons saying "I was lying to myself" - isn't necessarily a true statement, etc.) She is mentally ill She was coerced into saying she lied She didn't fully understand what she was admitting to lying about And I'm not even a professional-bullshit-peddler, and those aren't even case-tailored. Yet I bet tho… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/14 12:37 AM |
| 1 | TechCrunch Founder: "Unfortunately, when you have been accused of rape — even provably falsely as I have been — there’s no way to “win”. For the rest of my life, when someone searches my name on the internet, the word “rape” will appear somewhere among the results."Simple middle ground: allow the defendant the choice to have the case open to the public, and/or to have their name published. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/14 12:27 AM |
| 2 | TechCrunch Founder: "Unfortunately, when you have been accused of rape — even provably falsely as I have been — there’s no way to “win”. For the rest of my life, when someone searches my name on the internet, the word “rape” will appear somewhere among the results."The exception of course would be if the accused consents to having their name published. That's the key. The often-overlooked reason why the accused have been allowed to have their names published is because once-upon-a-time, a local politician & cronies could have you thrown in jail under whatever made-up pretenses and nobody would know to be upset because they never even knew about the case. That's one extreme end. The other is situations like this. We need a middle ground here. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/14 12:24 AM |
| 3 | Feminists losing their shit that the US Supreme Court just ruled that freedom of speech applies to everybody, including people who aren't feminists (specifically abortion protesters)YOU HAVE FREE SPEECH in America. You missed a few key conditions: You may not put others at risk or (much) perceived risk by doing so You are not immune to consequences of how others react to what you say Others do have the right to not give you a platform to speak on their own property You may not bear false witness/testimony You may not make libelous statements You act like these haven't always been components of "free speech" in the US (or most "1st world" countries). The core tenant of it is… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/14 12:17 AM |
| 4 | Looks like imgur is catching on a little.Yeah I can't defend what she's saying this time, but I do want to say that in general she actually does a pretty good job of calling out some bullshit said in here. She's posted in here for a little while. While she often takes an antagonistic tone, it's often valid criticism. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/14 11:25 PM |
| 3 | Look at all that wonderful male privilegeYeah, DavidByron2 has had a perverse view of the world at least since he/she started posting here. He/she is very active on this subreddit too. My personal voting score towards them is currently [-27] =\ I said all that to give weight to the statement: Don't take what /u/DavidByron2 says as something representative of many MRA's. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/14 09:58 PM |
| 1 | From parenting "I'm a SAH Dad who RSVPed to playground event. Organizer panicked that I wasn't female and cancelled the event!!The point is that gender is not a determining factor in likelihood to abuse kids. The argument that it matters whether or not the occurrence observed is an accident or not is ludicrous. Hell, it's not even consistent logic unless you believe the pay-gap is not due in large-part to choice, rather than bias. Your views continue to baffle me, ever since you've began commenting here. On the topic of the thread, though: Yeah, that's ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/14 12:45 AM |
| 1 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?I know nothing about the Russel Simmons case. My points were based entirely on general principle, not that specific instance at all. It's very possible the $120k/year is 100% justified for reasons that I don't know - but that's not my point. My point is that children are not entitled to a lifestyle similar to that of their non-custodial parent/extra funding (whichever description makes more sense based on income comparisons). Frankly it's getting old being the poster boy for unreasonable child s… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/14 04:18 AM |
| 1 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?Glad we agree the system's fucked up, but... sigh. I agree with your intentions, but I think they're misguided. The system as a whole is, without complete overhaul on the core workings of it, fucked up to the point that it will perpetually screw over child support payers. I would argue that the fungibility of money makes no difference at all. Really? Then you need to show how this: All that needs to be done is ensure that all the money received for child support is spent on the children. It's re… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 04:25 AM |
| 1 | Boys are less mature than girls, but men are more mature than women?Could you provide a source for that information? I've done a fair amount of human science studying over the years and never once heard this. I'm not saying I couldn't or wouldn't believe you, but critical thought demands that I don't take you at your word, as this is different (or at least runs a perpendicular route) from everything I've learned. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 03:31 AM |
| 2 | In your opinion, what are the three most important Mens' Rights Issues?Agreed. As a long-timer (I think? Do I get to call myself one? I've been here ~2 years now. I wonder if anyone ever recognizes me) I try to post on these when I can, but I definitely don't always. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 02:38 AM |
| 1 | In your opinion, what are the three most important Mens' Rights Issues?1) Addressing the education gap and trying to help males catch up. This is by far the biggest to me. I have absolutely no idea how this isn't a bigger issue to most. 2) Addressing and trying to correct legal disparities (primarily sentencing - the fact that gender gap is 3x as big as racial and hardly ever mentioned is ludicrous to me) 3) Eliminating/reducing the "males are disposable" model in society. While this one isn't a hard-nosed, objective, numbers-based issue so much, I believe it's at … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 02:36 AM |
| 0 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?Both parents have to provide all of the same necessities What? Your comment completely lacks context and is seemingly useless. So... thanks for the downvote and subsequent-completely-relevant-comment /s | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 02:22 AM |
| 2 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?I understand your idea but I'm going to challenge that thought-process a bit if you don't mind. I'm going to posit two scenarios, hopefully at least one will have you think a bit differently on the subject: Situation #1: Hypothetical scenario (A): I am a father of 1 and take home $100k/year (if only). Let's say the mother of my child is awarded $1k/month to give him/her the "lifestyle of my income". This is merely 12% of my take-home pay. You believe this is fair, yes? So let's try again. Hypoth… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 02:19 AM |
| 0 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?Long post but I hope at least one person reads it. Money being fungible is an issue I really think people need to develop a better understanding of! The problem with "proving money is spent on something" is that money is fungible. Thought-experiment-demonstration time! Liken it to water going into a bucket with water in it already: once the water's in there, there's no discernible difference - whether or not the specific water that went in for certain purpose was the specific water actually used… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 01:53 AM |
| 1 | AMR has some serious misconceptions about MRAs and the MRM.Very interesting read. Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 15/06/14 08:36 PM |
| 4 | Movement reflection time, what is our movements most un-egalitarian belief and how can we rectify it?We're in a bit of a conundrum when it comes to some disgusting views, though. If we don't downvote what we believe to be vile, disgusting views - we're lambasted for it and it's shown to at least be tolerated. Then there's disagreement on what's considered "disgusting and vile". I agree, though, that there's room for improvement on the "downvote if I dislike" attitude... but that's reddit and human nature as a whole. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/14 06:07 AM |
| 2 | I cannot defend A Voice for Men's Paul Elam from his scathing comments in 2010 about women "begging to be raped". If the feminists should take their worst to task, why not us?Clearly the lgbt movement didn't take note. They have no violent side that I'm aware of, and look what they've accomplished - nothing! /s | /r/MensRights | 09/06/14 05:56 AM |
| 1 | I cannot defend A Voice for Men's Paul Elam from his scathing comments in 2010 about women "begging to be raped". If the feminists should take their worst to task, why not us?Hmmm... where's the lgbt movement's threat of violence? I've seen none, yet a lot progress. EDIT: Laughing my ass off at those of you who downvoted me - you know my counter-example is 100% right, yet you are so pathetic your retorts are "....WELL DOWNVOTE CAUSE I'M WRONG". | /r/MensRights | 09/06/14 05:54 AM |
| 2 | "Why Rape is Sincerely Hilarious" This video connected with me so muchThat's great to hear, but some generalizations are okay. It's hard to discuss topics like these without generalizing an idea such as "patriarchy theory" or "violent criminals". Sure, there are some patriarchy theories that don't fit in with the "generalized one", just as there are some violent criminals that are, well, generally violent people that are technically criminals because they were wrongly convicted of tax fraud... but it's hard to have meaningful discussion if we nitpick all generaliz… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/14 02:08 AM |
| 4 | "Why Rape is Sincerely Hilarious" This video connected with me so muchYou can't claim to understand patriarchy if you preface it with the words "buying into." It means a lot of things and is used in a lot of different contexts. The foundation of truth in your first sentences lies in your second sentence holding merit. /u/fivefooteightgiant was seemingly talking about his or her idea of the patriarchy as seen most commonly and mainstream. There's plenty of examples of patriarchy. I play EVE Online, there's a patriarchy-element to that game. And definitely, there's … | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 09:54 PM |
| 1 | I got banned from /r/feminism for ... I have no idea.Didn't know about that but I assumed there was something like it. Regardless, though, wouldn't that apply a site-wide shadowban? | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 09:16 PM |
| 1 | I got banned from /r/feminism for ... I have no idea.It was definitely limited to just that subreddit, and according to him it happened within 2 minutes of replying to a mod that had just deleted a post of his, that he had already "trolled" the subreddit with a couple of other accounts and will just keep making more. I'd be surprised if the admins responded that quickly but I suppose it's possible. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 08:53 PM |
| 1 | I got banned from /r/feminism for ... I have no idea.Well that doesn't explain what I saw with my old roommate's account. New accounts were made, comments were shown as posted on the accounts, but not shown while off the account. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 07:56 PM |
| 1 | I got banned from /r/feminism for ... I have no idea.Can you source that? My (dumb) roommate showed me a year and a half ago how if he made a brand new account and posted to /r/askscience, the comment would appear to have been posted to him, but upon logging out or looking on my computer, it wouldn't be there. So again, as far as I know, it's the equivalent of a subreddit-specific shadow ban. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 07:47 PM |
| 4 | "Why Rape is Sincerely Hilarious" This video connected with me so much/u/fivefooteightgiant said he/she likes when others learn about "the other side". You are under the presumption that he/she has not taken the time to learn about patriarchy theory. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 07:10 PM |
| 1 | I got banned from /r/feminism for ... I have no idea.Like I said, it's the equivalent of a subreddit-specific shadow-ban. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 06:02 PM |
| 1 | I got banned from /r/feminism for ... I have no idea.There's a different kind of subreddit-specific "shadow-ban" that applies to your IP. It prevents known trolls from continuing to make accounts and force mods to ban them. Not sure of the specifics behind the mechanisms, but the effect is that making a new account lets you think others can see what you posted, but they can't. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 04:20 AM |
| 3 | Guys, are you afraid of walking alone at night?It's usually feminists that will spout off things like "women have much more reason to be afraid of walking alone at night". But this is not a topic that should be talked about (from the victim PoV) at all as a gendered one. I've never understood the logic behind people making it gendered. So to contrast "what women should fear" with "what men should fear" to show this... Men are much more likely to be the victims of violent crimes. The most-likely profile of the would-be-perpetrator is complete… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/14 04:52 PM |
| 2 | Dear god, did this actually happen? I may weep with joy.For clarity, I believe when /u/the_milkweed said: I am a mra only because I am egalitarian and happen to have a penis. He meant that he is an egalitarian, and since men's issues affect him personally quite a bit, he's very interested in advocating specifically for (at least) men. I don't believe that he meant "Being an MRA means I am a guy" or anything like that. I could be wrong, of course, but it just seems like there was some misinterpreting. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:06 AM |
| 1 | Should the MRA be tackling female-on-female rape and abuse?Forgive me but I didn't follow what you were saying too well. In any case, I'd like to clarify the OP's view, as from what I could decipher it seems to me that you may be reading into it in a different way than was intended. A big part of the rape issue, from a men's right advocate standpoint, is frustration over often only being considered a rapist if one penetrates another with their penis. While numerically speaking, this is an issue that affects mostly males raped by females, it also affects… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 05:24 AM |
| 1 | Should the MRA be tackling female-on-female rape and abuse?We're glad to have you here :) No doubt there's the occasional misogynist post, but in my experience the vast majority of people feel similarly to the comment made by /u/ithit | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 05:16 AM |
| 1 | "Reverse Sexism Does Not Exist"Poe's Law in effect. It's hard to tell sometimes :| | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 05:03 AM |
| 1 | I can't believe those ads existWhy would it be perverse or warped to explore the possibility? After an extremely short comparison of current affairs involving men with fucking genocide, sane people would immediately dismiss the notion. It's perverse because to see the former becoming the later denotes such a warped view that it's either deliberately asinine behavior or sheer stupidity and ignorance (towards either what is going on or what genocides consist of). seems more like ignoring the possibility of gradual genocide is i… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/14 07:18 AM |
| 1 | My school's pamphlet on domestic violence. Is there something wrong with this or am I overreacting?I know you posted this 2 days ago, but I'd like to say: it depends on how you define "most common". The highest rates? Yes. But the most likely to find/pick out in a sample (highest numbers)? Then no, it definitely wouldn't be. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/14 05:50 AM |
| 1 | I can't believe those ads existYou said "male holocaust" - what the fuck is that supposed to mean? Male party? | /r/MensRights | 23/05/14 11:49 PM |
| 1 | I can't believe those ads existWho said anything about genocide? You quite literally did. I guess I need to summarize the conversation thus far: Your very first comment, the top level comment, says current events are "how the male Holocaust" is starting. The next person said that's fucking stupid to liken this to a genocide. You essentially said it's happening, slowly. I said likening what's going on as precursors of a genocide is stupid and does us no favors Did you really forget the early part of the conversation that quick… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/14 05:10 PM |
| 1 | I can't believe those ads existOk, my poor wording. Let me correct myself: To even insinuate that what is slowly happening to men is leading to a genocide is not only a perverse and warped view, but it's downright asinine and ignorant. Happy? | /r/MensRights | 23/05/14 04:26 PM |
| 4 | Why in hell is /Mensrights in the Wikipedia "Controversial SReddits" and not SRS, AgainstMensRights, Picsofdeadkids, ETC?Well written. I'm glad, but perhaps relieved even more-so, that someone sees these issues as I do. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/14 06:43 AM |
| 2 | Why in hell is /Mensrights in the Wikipedia "Controversial SReddits" and not SRS, AgainstMensRights, Picsofdeadkids, ETC?Well... I typically try to call out generalizations... but that one made me chuckle. Some humor is good :) | /r/MensRights | 23/05/14 06:39 AM |
| 1 | I can't believe those ads existOr maybe you have just been conditioned to accept the systematic abuse of men as normal, and have come to accept the unacceptable. Or maybe you're just a paranoid person with a fixation on victimhood, while we're grasping at straws here. To even compare a society where men are taken advantage of and treated as lesser citizens in every way, with military action to seek out, imprison, and exterminate every single member of multiple demographics is not only a perverse and warped view, but it's down… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/14 04:39 AM |
| -1 | I can't believe those ads existClaiming that how men are treated is predication to genocide on a massive scale doesn't do the men's rights movement any favors and isn't realistic. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/14 12:26 PM |
| 1 | First, every one said she was raped. Nope, just wanted to watch something die.It seems like you're blowing things out of proportion and are being sensationalist. Some slight sensationalism is fine but... c'mon. We need to be fair and consistent. I still see nothing about the suggestion that there was rape involved, besides the one comment where the defense attorney said: "She's not vicious, she's not vicious at all," Cornwell said. "When things come out, there will be an 'aha' moment." Which is something a defense attorney would say. And even that bit from Cornwell... the… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/14 11:59 AM |
| 3 | I just wanted to thank this subredditI'm surprised by your comment score. I don't think it's right or fair to fault someone for being prejudiced as long as they both realize it and work towards making their thoughts more fair towards everyone. Maybe I'm quite different from most people but I'm confused as to why more people don't follow the same line of thinking as me on this matter. We don't generally fault mentally ill people who hear voices/"want to kill" as long as they fight it, do we? Why should we treat other things differen… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/14 10:21 AM |
| 1 | I just wanted to thank this subredditI'm confused as well. You'd rather not share publicly, though? | /r/MensRights | 18/05/14 10:15 AM |
| 17 | /u/girlwriteswhat has hit the frontpage again.That's interesting. Could you elaborate on what scientific and historical assertions are wrong? I haven't watched the video yet (no sound) but would be interested in reading what you have to say before I watch it. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/14 02:17 AM |
| 5 | Title IX Suit Filed Against University of Oregon On Behalf of Male Students.Actually it seems they were giving a little bit of background on who the fuck he is (as most articles do). They mentioned that he's taken on unfavorable stances before, and it's also implied that he's left-leaning which is counter to the narrative that's given regarding people who advocate for men. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/14 10:09 PM |
| 2 | What about the women?!?!?!1Well, certainly they need to be treated the same as homeless male vets. But as to why don't we talk specifically about homeless female vets? Maybe because there's between 130,000 and 200,000 homeless male vets (if they were their own city, they'd be between the 194th and 112th biggest city in the US) but only between 1,300 and 3,300 (a small village) homeless female vets. Maybe that's why we don't specifically address homeless female vets, and just say "homeless vets". Maybe. edit: some city siz… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/14 09:01 AM |
| 3 | How many women subscribe to r/mensrights?You could very well be right, and if you are, I sincerely apologize for misinformation. I honestly am not sure. When I commented, I assumed that that was the reason the one person downvoted him/her (his/her score was 1|1 at the time) and I know how frustrating it can feel when all you're trying to do is provide help and.... downvotes :\ To put it in words, it's: "I don't even give a shit about karma... but c'mon! Upvote this! It will help people understand shit!" But yeah... not sure. I'll see i… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/14 01:01 AM |
| 6 | How many women subscribe to r/mensrights?I didn't downvote you but I'm guessing that the person who did, did so because as far as I know... the demographic survey that you are citing was "rigged" by a bunch of people from SRS and what-have-you just coming in and taking the surveys. There's a newer, more accurate one I believe. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/14 08:40 PM |
| 4 | Boko Haram butchers schoolboys en masse for 8 months in Nigeria, no outrage. Media claims in May the same group abducted 200+ schoolgirls. Cataclysmic outrage. US pledges diplomatic & military intervention, Change.org hosts petition signed by hundreds of thousands, and SJWs set Twitter on fire.So maybe you can see why when you said I can't even believe this is a debate Some people got upset and think that's a crock of shit? That said, thanks for civilizing the debate again. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/14 08:26 PM |
| 1 | "I am Worth More"I think that while some of the people you've been talking to are transphobic, the original commenter's main intent was making a joke of the picture. She/he did so by by identifying themself as a bunch of different things to show how extreme that picture's logic can get. Even if that wasn't the original commenter's main intent, that's what it seems to be, and why it got so many upvotes. For what it's worth, I agree completely with you on most of what you have said about transsexuals/transgendered… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/14 06:27 PM |
| 12 | "I Have a Boyfriend," an article reinforcing the idea that we're all drunk animals that won't take no for an answerAlready argued with this one quite a few times at length with some feminists. This is not a gendered issue in any way, shape, or form. If we follow her logic that requiring "I have a boyfriend" shows that men only respect men and is male privilege... what about the cases where women won't take a simple "no" for an answer? We're shown in media (and in my personal life at least, experience frequently) that men are pretty much never supposed to reject women's sexual advances. The idea that a man wo… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/14 11:38 PM |
| 1 | I am a feminist- but not what feminists think is a feminist!Glad to hear it :) It's what I consider myself. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/14 04:26 AM |
| 1 | I am a feminist- but not what feminists think is a feminist!Egalitarian. Equality for all. Many people here are. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/14 04:26 AM |
| 11 | When feminists say "male privilege," I think they may have forgotten about this.As a feminist (please don't kill me) No, not at all. Your post demonstrates a desire for men and women to be at liberty to express themselves in (safe) ways to their heart's content. Not only that, but you were clear and not a prick about it. So, no, I'd never persecute you based on anything you said. Besides, my views align 100% with what you said. However, I'm curious - why do you consider yourself a "feminist"? The term, etymologically speaking, does a really poor job of conveying your views.… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/14 05:02 AM |
| 1 | Dear MRAs, what does an equal society look like to you?Which is completely contradictory to what they claim, if that's why I was banned. They claim that feminism is for men and can discuss men's issues as long as it is an issue to women's issues as well. Which I did. But then got banned. Lol :| | /r/MensRights | 30/04/14 03:28 AM |
| 1 | Dear MRAs, what does an equal society look like to you?I believe that has more to do with the fact that it's asking about how her unique situation would affect her ability to do her job. Just like how Mitt Romney was asked how his past as a big-businessman would affect his ability to function as president. I'm not sure I see the link between that and discrimination. On a sidenote, remember how yesterday we were talking about how "Well, in /r/feminism, you would get banned. Here we might downvote you but we will never censor you."? I got banned today… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/14 08:43 PM |
| 1 | Dear MRAs, what does an equal society look like to you?For what it's worth, I didn't downvote you, but: Do you think that's due to his gender? I think it has nothing to do with his gender... That's kind of the exact fucking point I'm making. It had nothing to do with hers either. And do you think that if Hilary Clinton had an affair with her secretary, that it wouldn't be all over the news? Um... again... what? I think it definitely would? How is this relevant or helping your argument? Or dismantling my criticism of yours? | /r/MensRights | 29/04/14 03:25 PM |
| 1 | Dear MRAs, what does an equal society look like to you?...2008 Election? McCain? Or did you really not hear "He's too fucking old" 3,000 times? | /r/MensRights | 29/04/14 05:40 AM |
| 2 | “If you're a convicted criminal, the best thing you can have going for you might be your gender” — HuffPo in response to men being sentenced longer for the same crimesAs /u/cuteman said, you're 100% right - it's just as unprovable and likely false. For what it's worth, I downvote them too. There's plenty of people in this sub for "traditionalist" reasons - to "take shit back for men", which is in my opinion, a terrible reason to support this subreddit. Fortunately, I believe most are here because they support men getting fair treatment as well. All that said, you will still get downvotes if you post something contradictory to what someone believes, particular… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/14 11:47 PM |
| 1 | ‘Man Up,’ ‘Don’t Be A Pussy’ Labeled Offensive Language at Duke UniversityI originally replied with this in response to someone's comment but I think this is worth sharing. It's an episode from Penn & Teller's "Bullshit!" and goes into this kind of topic. Summarily, fuck any ass-cunt that thinks they have the right to not be offended by profanity or ideas/opinions. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/14 08:09 PM |
| 3 | ‘Man Up,’ ‘Don’t Be A Pussy’ Labeled Offensive Language at Duke UniversityPenn & Teller's show "Bullshit!" has a great video on that concept. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2k_hpH4hs8 | /r/MensRights | 28/04/14 08:05 PM |
| 1 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.I clearly need to show you where your logic breaks down. Your cognitive dissonance is severe and I'm frankly baffled as to how you possibly have the views you do. Please read the bit on "zero-sum" game if nothing else. I'm going to quote every part of your comment and break it down in the hopes that you can end this streak of being misguided, or be appropriately identified as a bigot and what we're fighting against so I can just downvote, ignore, and move on. So here we go: And most men are stra… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/14 10:37 PM |
| 4 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.You don't realistically deserve an iota of anyone's time. But I'll give you the response most in this world would like to, you bigoted self-righteous prick: This is /r/MENSRIGHTS . What does "men's rights" mean? Read it again you illiterate shit. Now re-read it again. And again. You probably still don't understand, so I'll explain it for you: This subreddit is about advancing the rights of all men. Not straight men. Not black men. Not young men. Not disabled men. All men. So, what does that mean… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/14 05:25 AM |
| 3 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Thank you for this. I think this is one issue where the contrast is truly made between those who support most things on this subreddit for egalitarian reasons... from those who support it as a "traditionalist" who, in your words, wants to "take stuff back" for men. I hope we can continue to raise these issues so that we can really separate the latter group from the rest of us. I strongly believe that it's that latter group that does the majority of the public opinion shaping that keeps us from b… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/14 05:09 AM |
| 4 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.I appreciate the attempt, but: mental disorder Why would it be considered a mental disorder? Note in the definition where it states: "A mental disorder is a pattern...that causes either suffering or an impaired ability to function in ordinary life" Do you see men wearing dresses suffering internally because of it? Your obvious answer should be (I hope) NO. Which leaves us with what? A socially constructed idea that men shouldn't wear dresses. Why? Because gender policing and gender norms. This i… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/14 01:52 AM |
| 8 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Ok, I'm sick of listening to your and /u/nyehhhhhh 's shit without saying anything. The point of this thread is to eliminate society's gender policing. Yes, we realize that whether or not a man can wear a dress without being ridiculed is, at the end of the day, NOT A BIG FUCKING DEAL. Since you're both obnoxiously stupid pricks, it bears repeating: this is about trying to reduce/eliminate gender policing. Men should all be able to wear whatever the fuck they want and not be ridiculed for it, reg… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 06:36 PM |
| 1 | Getting ready to black-knight a high school girlThere's a problem with that though. That's trying to treat a symptom with the wrong medication (let alone going after the symptom not the illness). As evidenced with this story, people can claim rape when it wasn't. What would have been different with OP's story if he hadn't even had sex with her and she claimed rape? Scarily, nothing. | /r/TheRedPill | 19/04/14 01:49 AM |
| 1 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - KidwalkEveryone is exposed to the same risk management knowledge and alcohol awareness, its patronizing to say that women need special and extra help with it. that right there is enough evidence to convince me that you cannot talk about this topic subjectively. 1) who said only women, 2) that's such a huge assumption that i can't even believe you would seriously possibly think that everyone has been exposed equally. you're beyond reason. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 08:38 PM |
| 1 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - Kidwalkhow is it patronizing for me to be giving you advice on the topic? and who is "they"? Unhelpful, depicting rape as a matter of women doing things to avoid it now i'm pretty sure you're just a troll. men and women CAN DO THINGS TO AVOID GETTING RAPED, and TELLING THEM THERE'S NOTHING TO DO IS NOT HELPFUL you dense shit. set it up then. i'm not convinced you thoroughly can look at this objectively. i was raped twice and i can - how the fuck can you not? | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 06:04 PM |
| 4 | So I'm at a benefitneeded to make that more clear in post. your OP just looks like meaningless rambling. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 10:47 PM |
| 3 | She admitted it.i think that the better way to say it might be "we believe in equality but personally wish to perform 'traditional gender roles'". by saying that you "believe in traditional gender roles" that's saying that you believe that that's how all heterosexual relationships should work. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 10:46 PM |
| 1 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - Kidwalkwhat do you define as "patronizing"? misleading i can get behind, but "unhelpful" is a bit of a loaded word as well. if we're going to speak from a practical point of view, i don't see how doing any of this after the fact is bad. this is still detracting from the point that you were arguing against though: SCREAMING "HOW DARE YOU TELL ME HOW TO PREVENT DANGEROUS SITUATIONS" IS COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE TO HELPING PREVENT RAPES. you still haven't directly responded "yes i agree with that" or "no i don't… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 10:23 PM |
| 3 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - Kidwalki understand that. but maybe i can make it more clear why many MRAs (not myself, though) feel the need to attack feminism. for starters: what do you think those signs DID say? before they were edited, that is. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 10:11 PM |
| 1 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - Kidwalki'm not sure you've understood this yet even though at least one person has tried, so i'm going to try again but i'm going to type in caps so maybe you'll actually read and internalize it: INTENT OF THE OFFENDER IS BESIDE THE GODDAMN POINT. THE POINT IS THAT WE CAN DECREASE THE NUMBER OF INCIDENCES BY TEACHING EVERYONE HOW TO AVOID DANGEROUS SITUATIONS. YES, WE CAN STILL TELL PEOPLE RAPE IS BAD. YES, RAPE IS A SHITTY FUCKING THING. But NO, NOT TEACHING PEOPLE HOW TO AVOID RAPE WILL NOT HELP REDU… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 08:43 PM |
| 3 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - Kidwalki think that intent is beside the point. regardless of intent, we still will generally fault the driver/rapist. the point was that the argument that "we shouldn't teach people how to avoid being victims" is illogical and impractical - it will only serve to increase the number of incidences. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 08:35 PM |
| 1 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - Kidwalki agree with you but i may be able to present ramblingn0mad's point a bit more clearly to you as i agree with it as well. i think you're both wary of the extremes of the other's solution and would be fine with a moderate version. i believe that ramblingn0mad is saying that if we minimize saying "rape is bad", that the desires to carry it out will overwhelm the social stigma currently associated with raping someone. his/her fear is "if rape already occurs as it is now - what happens if not everyo… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 08:29 PM |
| 10 | Funny how stupid something can sound when you apply the same logic elsewhere - Kidwalkwhat does that have to do with the comment you replied to? the comment you replied to talks of teaching people to not rape AS WELL AS how to avoid situations where they are likely to be raped. i'm not seeing the direct connection. based on your comment it seems more like you're angry and looking to get others worked up as well (see: troll) as opposed to responding directly to the comment you're replying to. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 08:20 PM |
| 2 | What does it mean when feminists say men's issues are feminist issues?i am an MRA and i care about women. your move. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/13 10:31 PM |
| 2 | RESULTS FROM THE R/MENSRIGHTS SURVEYlol, yes, my apologies. was distracted while typing that. also, agreed, mode is dumb. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 03:07 PM |
| 2 | RESULTS FROM THE R/MENSRIGHTS SURVEYconfusion may arise from using "mean" versus using "median" | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 12:42 AM |
| 0 | RESULTS FROM THE R/MENSRIGHTS SURVEYmost of my friends, including myself will be getting a bachelors degree by 22, if not, 23. so while i can't speak on behalf of the entire subreddit, i know that in my life i'm not considered abnormal. in fact, i grew up in an area where if you didn't get a bachelor's degree, you would be widely regarded as an idiot or lazy. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 12:39 AM |
| 3 | Feminists can find a way to be offended by literally anything. This time, it's the word "ladies". Seriously.actually, while i completely agree that this is TRIVIAL, she did make a valid point that it may as well be changed to "women". i think it can be reasonably assumed that the gym obviously has/had no intentions of any gender bias by saying "men" and "ladies". however, i'm not a fan of crucifying her for this as she didn't act as if it's something that didn't let her sleep at night. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/13 02:50 AM |
| 2 | The problem with the Child Support debate when utilizing "Pro-Choice" as reason to consider the idea of financial abortion.i'm sorry, maybe i missed something, but i don't know how that would change anything? by the way, i'd like to add: i've absolutely loved this thread. a lot of thought-provoking discussion. i'll have a lot to think about while i try to fall asleep in a few minutes. thanks for the discourse :P | /r/MensRights | 23/05/13 07:26 AM |
| 2 | The problem with the Child Support debate when utilizing "Pro-Choice" as reason to consider the idea of financial abortion.i agree with your entire post, but i'd like to nitpick one of your sentences a bit. Nobody should be forced to take responsibility for a child they didn't want. i'm undecided on how i feel about abortion (other than it shouldn't be illegal). however, i disagree with how this sentence is worded, albeit not necessarily the premise. while my version isn't perfect by any means, i think a slightly better way to word it would be: One party should not always be at the mercy of the other in deciding whe… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/13 07:11 AM |
| 4 | The problem with the Child Support debate when utilizing "Pro-Choice" as reason to consider the idea of financial abortion.as the eldest of 4 children from divorced parents, i can say that while your suggestion for "solving" finances by granting fifty-fifty custody has good intentions, there's almost nearly no way that would work out well. my parents were divorced quite nastily. fifty-fifty custody was granted to each, and thankfully my mother lived no further than a few miles away from my father. however.... 50/50 custody never equates to 50/50 payment. not even close. child expenses are not uniformly divided out w… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/13 06:46 AM |
| 4 | Woman has consensual sex with man. Changes her mind. He stops and apologizes. 4 years in prison.you're either fucking stupid or a troll. like the OP of that pathetic story. my girlfriend tells me "stop" every once in a while while we're having sex. ....because it's hurting her and she needs me to give her a second. or change positions. or she heard a roommate come home and our door isn't completely closed. or she forgot to take her birth control and needs to pop one. not once because she didn't want to continue to have sex. the fact that you think the man couldn't have possibly mistaken a … | /r/MensRights | 20/05/13 09:44 PM |
| 5 | A new shirt I had made.yeah, i was half-joking. some people, to be, are just not worth the effort. there's many others out there willing to even consider that they could be wrong. people like that aren't seemingly one of them :c | /r/MensRights | 15/05/13 08:33 PM |
| 6 | A new shirt I had made.r u mad? ????????//// | /r/MensRights | 15/05/13 03:05 PM |
| 7 | A new shirt I had made....yeah this is your 5% of MRA that's full-on retard, and are actual bigots. hence why they should just be downvoted and ignored. let them shout at walls. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/13 03:03 PM |
| 3 | The curious case of Jodi Arias, and it's effect on male victimsagreed. i'm not sure how i feel about the death penalty. i've really tried hard to find a stance that suits me, but it's an issue i just can't take much of a stance on. i feel pretty strongly about it, i'm just not sure what's best. on your point of frustration over her lying and changing her story, though: don't worry, she's destroyed her credibility and now is much more likely to be found guilty. however, they still have to entertain the idea that whatever story she settles on is true. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 04:44 PM |
| 3 | The curious case of Jodi Arias, and it's effect on male victimsi understand and agree with you. in the end it comes down to whether or not she's actually deluded enough to not see the hypocrisy in the things she's saying. if she does, then shame on her. if not, well, still shame on her for not being able to see it when it's pointed out - but not necessarily any more than anyone else stuck in their own convictions. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 04:36 PM |
| 2 | The curious case of Jodi Arias, and it's effect on male victimsOnce they take the oath, expert witnesses are supposed to testify "the whole truth," not just "the truth that confirms the case of the people paying me." yes, but you have to understand that in her mind, she clearly believes those two are synonymous. i'm not saying she ISN'T biased, but she doesn't see herself as biased. it's like calling up the defendant's best friend to the stand and asking the best friend to talk about how great the defendant is. the bias is obvious, even if the best friend b… | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 04:09 PM |
| 2 | The curious case of Jodi Arias, and it's effect on male victimsshe's holding onto the self defense claim, though, in hopes of, say, 5-20 years in prison instead of, say, life in prison/death penalty. however, i don't understand at this point how her defense isn't to admit total fault in the murder and hope for a chance at parole/only life in prison/reduced sentence/whatever (unsure about what she's facing) due to saving everyone time and money. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 03:59 PM |
| 12 | The curious case of Jodi Arias, and it's effect on male victimsexactly. come on people, let's be honest - not every feminist thinks the patriarchy is behind everything. plenty of feminists would think otherwise. the minute we start collectively demonizing and stereotyping their movement, we're against everything BOTH /r/MensRights and /r/Feminism stand for | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 03:57 PM |
| 2 | Feminism vs. Facts Part II: Thunderf00t takes down Anita Sarkeesian's continued assault on the 'boys club' in gaming.lupe fiasco did a song meant to criticize much of this. i wouldn't go as far as to say it's (nowadays) perpetuated merely by record companies, but partially, certainly. good video/song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3m3t_PxiUI | /r/MensRights | 05/05/13 07:33 PM |
| 6 | It's not as bad as you would thinki think it's 61.359235901033% of the time hey guys let's keep pulling numbers out of our asses - anecdotes are a great way to advance a cause! | /r/MensRights | 29/04/13 08:06 AM |
| 22 | Found this while in my reading class. Spent some class time debating it.EXACTLY! as an egalitarian i feel like i'm beating my head against a wall when it comes to dealing with feminists sometimes (you guys have your own issues but still) "hey, i know i claim to be trying to advance women's cause, but let's stereotype both genders to strawman/bullrush a slight criticism of my work!" | /r/MensRights | 29/04/13 07:39 AM |
| 3 | After being 'failed' by her college's administration, blogger decides to "out" alleged rapist without a conviction, is congratulated by other women.19 percent of the women reported experiencing a completed or attempted sexual assault since entering college, while 2.5 percent of the men reported being perpetrators. maybe the 2.5% is sexually assaulting the 19%? :S | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 06:01 AM |
| 0 | How I learned to grow some balls and stand up against feminist oppressionWhatever you have against feminism is coming from your own insecurities. no. on a meta level, i agree with what many of those who support feminism want to achieve: women having the exact same rights as men. however, the idea that feminism lines up with that is a bit of a stretch at times. many objectives rallied under the "FOAR FEMINIZM!" banner are misguided. again, while i know many feminists want equality, the steps taken typically aren't the right ones for true equality. However, on the whol… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 05:55 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter