~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?Well ... you know what they say ... opinions are like assholes ... everyone's got one. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/13 01:42 AM |
| 3 | What a mature take on things.Highly structured systems need fully available workers. You need the marks at a specific time to qualify for certain organizations. It's similar in Japan, a homogenous and structured society. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/13 01:31 AM |
| 10 | What a mature take on things.Or men should have the option to take leave to spend more time with newborns. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/13 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?Well I wouldn't say that was Steinem specifically ... she seems moderate from my research. But I just heard of her yesterday. And her work was likely used as a springboard. Liberation seems inevitable in history, but these movements usually have catalysts/galvanizers where oppression is involved. I say oppression because the status quo and the legislation gave women fewer rights (Steinem participated in the Equal Rights Amendment and Roe vs. Wade), and feminists faced ridicule and hostility. The… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/13 11:04 PM |
| 1 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?Feminists need more opposition. They dominate the gender conversation, and can circlejerk with impunity. Men should do more research at universities and do more investigative journalism so I can actually see this link you're talking about. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/13 08:33 PM |
| 1 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?How did Steinem vilify your gender? She felt that women were being controlled for their reproductive systems. She said that this idea clicked when she attended a meeting on abortions and realized that she kept hers a secret. This idea may have had truth, but perhaps it was interpreted as man = sex masters, which has been proven to be NOT true following the liberation movement. It was probably an idealogy shaped to protect the psyche during WWII. Please cite yourself. Ms. Magazine sold out in a w… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/13 08:22 PM |
| 1 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?http://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/nov/13/gloria-steinem-interview-feminism-abortion http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/18/fashion/in-the-womans-movement-who-will-replace-gloria-steinem.html?pagewanted=all http://nymag.com/news/features/ms-magazine-2011-11/ My research of Gloria Steinem paints her as really human. She thought she would end up having kids and getting married. She thought was perceived as a hooker when she was looking for an apartment, because she had her own money. Her editors wan… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/13 05:01 AM |
| 2 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?Those two links talk about the CIA funding the "Independent Service for Information, set up at Harvard specifically for the purpose of getting some young anti-Communist Americans to attend a huge youth festival being organized by the Communists in Vienna in 1959", which Gloria Steinem was recruited to run. It wasn't until 1972 that she founded Ms. Magazine. I also looked at Wikipedia, which says a radical feminist group, raised the question of whether Steinem had continuing ties with the Central… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/13 04:15 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I'm not mocking sexual assault ... I've just been sexually assaulted before and I got counseling at my Sexual Assault Resource Center, and I don't react to it with the same shock anymore. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 09:34 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.How did I do that? Edit: Stupid posting time limit. I meant that wearing a suit is the social equivalent of "asking for it". "it" being harassment/assault | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 09:23 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.TIL suits are the male equivalent of wearing skirts on the street. And casually dressed males in court are the Muslims of air travel. I guess male costumery is also oppressive ... | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 08:34 AM |
| 1 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?Could you please elaborate on the first point? | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 08:14 AM |
| 1 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?And propaganda, jokes, dark humor | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 08:04 AM |
| 4 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?It's not really about the poster. It's about his being denied access to his child because of bias against men. Bias against men that, as he said, is likely due to the "larger feminist movement". That poster triggered fear in him. It's like seeing an advertisement for OJ Simpsom's sports team at a woman's battery center; it makes you question their affiliations. His trust was violated once. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 07:46 AM |
| 3 | Feminism @ Crisis centers; a human rights violation?I believe that name was taken by the intellectuals of the Renaissance. You should anonymoisly tip the crisis center how you felt about the poster. Maybe even on Yelp. You have a voice, you just have to say it in subtle ways (this is why we have media like satire, sarcasm, etc.). Just be honest like you were here. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 07:03 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I am aware of women's issues, there is no need to lecture me on what I "should" read or how I "should" analyze your comment. I have sponsored campaigns about various women's issues and to this day support them. I have never seen a feminist group do the same for men's issues, and that is the problem. Sorry, I'm getting trigger responses from other users (I didn't mean you), and all the hostility is really loud. I would sign any petition that I thought could alleviate the crap men have to deal wit… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 12:22 PM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I'm sorry, I'm getting like 30 rhetorical responses and I feel like it's pointless to respond because I'll either get more responses for a long answer or an angry response for a short answer. I would argue that housewifery is credit. At least in some countries, it seems to make it easier to make them wear burqas and not drive. What are you referring to with the Gordian Knot? I agree with you on your argument, it's general, but it makes sense. We both agree that there's gender inequality. Unless … | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 11:39 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.But I am am honestly curious, and I have the same standards to truth as an academic, a debater, or a genuinely curious person. I think it differs by person. I am in the habit of putting the burden of proof on myself. I respect others' time and skepticism. I do wish to do more research, but it is my experience that information can be hard to separate from bull, and I was hoping that you would have a reliable, centralized source. I am interested. I respect your time, and ask that you respect the s… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 11:28 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I think am I exercising my judgment honestly. I honestly think your arguments are immature (perhaps it was tactless to call YOU immature). I'm sorry, I just have extremely negative experiences with the rest of the members of this subreddit and even the mods, so I ended up insulting you. The mods said that this subreddit tolerates casual insults, and I thought that was a jab at me for monotonous, so I was trying to get into the spirit of insulting people. Honestly my head is spinning from all the… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 11:15 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.You really think institutional feminism serves no other purpose? That there's no institutional or societal gender issues putting women at a disadvantage? You should read Lean In. It cites interesting studies where women are perceived as less than men or rewarded less. It also talks about how women are a minority in many areas and have difficulty fitting in to the culture or being appropriatly aggressive or they will be perceived as a bitch for behavior a male would do. Also one study showed that… | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 10:09 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I've heard that ties highlight male sexuality. I've also heard it is a noose. Strange that this is part of the identity of a professional male. You do get wages and professional acceptance in return for your submission. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 09:38 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.It's a stereotype, meaning a subgroup of males gave off that impression, loudly enough to get that child support law passed perhaps. And the law may have been passed before birth control and abortion or when women were systematically dependent on men, so the stakes were high. And this sterreotype is still objectifying to women. It is unfair to men. Thankfully it's obvious most people don't fit stereotypes. The pure moral non agent is a great term. Do you know a good article or resource about it … | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 09:24 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Preventing STDs in the case of FGM seems implausible at least. True. There are other ways of preventing STDs, at least. It's like giving baby girls a masectomy to prevent breast cancer. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 09:08 AM |
| 0 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Your argument shows immaturity and lack of awareness of high level patterns in society. A first grader could make the same arguments ... | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 08:57 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I can, but it's polite to back your own claims, so that the other person doesn't have to waste their time figuring out where the hell you found your information, assuming that your memory is correct | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 08:45 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.But resources must be divvied up, and often, the pattern is that males (or females) are screwed over. And self interest and sophisticated game theories to stay on top brew resentment and some people become angry in an attempt to incite revolution. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 01:41 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Can you please cite if you remember the original source? | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 01:25 AM |
| 1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.You are absolutely right. You can spend more than you can earn. It's called credit. And many complain that creditors (aka bankers) are oppressive. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 01:12 AM |
| 0 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.True. True. But "gender" is something we all agree on. Ties are a male article of clothing. Women aren't allowed to wear ties, they're for men. If a woman wears a tie, she is being edgy. Edgy is a difficult lifestyle to maintain. People may not discriminate based on gender in the persecutory sense, but in the "recognition and understanding of the difference between one thing and another" sense | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 01:58 PM |
| 8 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Thanks | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 01:43 PM |
| 0 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Maybe the MR movement should help ;) | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 01:32 PM |
| 2 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Your suggestion about 3 regarding India and about 1 regarding gyms are deeply, deeply offensive. I believe this may be why you get some rather harsh words from people. Allow me to explain: What you are suggesting is that only men make acid attacks and that all men are suspects for the single fact that they are men. That only men commit sexual harassment and that all men are suspects for the single fact that they are men. If you are not, then any suggestion for segregation is completely and utter… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 01:12 PM |
| 3 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Oh. Yeah that's not okay. Hitting is not socially acceptable ... unless it's like "oops I wanted to finish this work so I couldn't take your dog I was babysitting to the vet and he died" ... then I would understand if someone hit me. I was thinking more like Megan Fox and the guy from Lost in Eminem's music video "Love The Way You Lie" in terms of DV. Yeah I was taken advantage of by this supervisor who was 10 years older than me and was the only one who could help me on my project. It was suppo… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 12:13 PM |
| -1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.You're absolutely right. I'm used to a lot of benefits -- like the clothes I wear that might exploit farmers and factory workers who earn very little for their labor. doesn't mean it's unwanted Actually, benevolent sexism is positively correlated with and complementary to hostile sexism, according to both this paper and this. Both benevolent and hostile sexism predict gender inequality. I don't know which feminists or what crime cases you're talking about. But I'm sure many women follow this sub… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 11:13 AM |
| -4 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I was being more precise in my defense against your vitriol. I don't need to remove whatever else you're accusing me off. Please stop verbally abusing me. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 10:46 AM |
| -3 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I don't care what you think of me. I just think you misunderstand. I editted my previous comment for clarification, by the way. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 10:25 AM |
| -1 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I think you misinderstood me. Hitting that does not cause damage (like one slap under 0.1 pounds per square inch) is more emotional abuse. But if bruises form, then that might be the arbitrary line where police can arrest people. And why would you not want to leave people who are toxic (except to bring them to justice?) edit: clarification under the duress of vitriol | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 10:10 AM |
| -4 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.I don't know what stable has to do with dirty and dangerous. Safe jobs can be unstable. But that seems true for working class America. One could argue that this is partly due to benevolent sexism. I've read a study where women in construction struggled to overcome gender issues at work. And this is not true for poorer countries, like China and India, where everyone works dirty jobs. I'm not sure about the dangerous ones, though. Edit: dirty and dangerous jobs can also be exciting. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 09:59 AM |
| -4 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.One could argue that spending power, but not necessarily earning power, is benevolent sexism ... | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 09:47 AM |
| -4 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Women comprise only 34% of physicians and surgeons, but 91% of nurses, a lower paying job. The female physicians are less likely than their male counterparts to own at least a part of their practice. Women are less than 6% in each of these surgical fields: neurological, orthopedic, thoracic, urological. Women are 20% of full professors in medicine. source | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 09:13 AM |
| -13 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.3 counts as anti BS, although, if like in India, men show up to throw acid on or otherwise harass the women, the programs should be segregated. 1 counts as anti BS if the co-ed gym is safe for women (does not allow inter sex harassment, enforces the rule) 2 isn't reasonable. Arrest anyone who severely physically damages another person, even if both have battered each other (except for self defense). But you make it sound like if a wife slaps her husband leaving a red mark, he can break her nose … | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 08:44 AM |
| -3 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.The first two I have not heard of. Please cite, if possible? The people who run for and win office are predominantly male. It's good that some women have taken advantage of an opportunity to do this interesting research. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 07:50 AM |
| 7 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.Clarification: that "special right" is "a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology that offers protection and affection to women who embrace conventional roles" | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 06:57 AM |
| -7 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.But men are overrepresented in many lucrative and presrigious fields: medicine, academia, corporate leadership, STEM. Who has a monopoly on what? | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 06:54 AM |
| -8 | Explanation for the animosity towards Men's Rights? Psychology experiments suggest that men who demonstrate low benevolent sexism are erroneously believed to be mysogynistic, more likely to commit DV, be less supportive of professional women, and be worse husbands and fathers.The study you provided shows that low BS (benevolent sexism -- a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology that offers protection and affection to women who embrace conventional roles) men were judged to be more HS (hostile sexism -- antipathy toward women who are viewed as usurping men's power) unless the man said he was motivated by egalitarian values. source of defs But the question is ... What special right? Women have the same rights as men. To think women have "special rights" (unless yo… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/13 06:23 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter