TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

truthiness79 Archive

View 0 posts and 146 comments by truthiness79 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

i find it it difficult to find the credibility of a supposedly secret document that uses the phrase "pussy-whipped" multiple times. for something supposedly written by people who are "coldly objective", it makes use of phrasings that are undeniably subjective.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:14 AM
0

nice. so Obama didnt bail out the banks. TARP 2 doesnt exist in your mind, right? it was all Bush? and Obama isnt Afghanistanizing the Middle East? trampling civil liberties? assassinating Americans? you are the quintessential partisan hack. your party can do no wrong. you wont even admit that there is no difference between the two parties. one is pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, the other is pro-life, anti-gay marriage. big fucking whoop. they agree on every other issue. they both are pro-war, the…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:28 PM
1

"oligarchal right"-because the left doesnt support that as well? did Obama not bail out the banks as well? or is that okay with you, because hes a liberal? and we killed people in Libya for what? because they supported Ghaddafi? the rebels were supported by al Queda, and would have been squashed without France and the US intervening. but i guess killing people in other countries that are no threat to the US is only a problem when its a Republican in office, but not when its a Democrat. you are s…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 07:02 PM
0

was Libya not an unnecessary war? both parties are warmongers. one pretends its about national security, the other pretends its about "humanitarianism." in the end its about military imperialism. the US is preparing to Afghanistanize countries like Syria and Iran, in order to being "peace and stability to the region." to believe that nonsense makes you just as much a partisan hack as the neocons.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:17 AM
1

but isnt Sweden going from left to right? i read somewhere that Sweden was embracing free market reforms.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:09 AM
0

feminism would be nothing more than a religion, like Scientology or Wicca, without the government. to try to absolve the government for its part in this madness seems idiotic, to say the least. and what exactly do modern liberals (i make a huge distinction between modern liberals and classical liberals) have to offer society? im honestly curious. can you explain?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:08 AM
1

explain why returning to the gold standard is "disastrously stupid." you sound like someone who is completely clueless about economics.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:04 AM
2

hes known for showcasing the logical fallacies of religions in general. but hes also posted a good number of videos pointing out that feminism is fueled by hatred. hes not MR though. im just going to go on a WILD GUESS that the girl who posted his video online is a feminist whos angry at him for exposing their hypocrisy, and thought a sex video would be the easiest way to discredit him.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:32 PM
2

if you honestly think its okay that your wife manipulated the court system into having you thrown in prison, then theres really no helping you.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 02:31 AM
3

theres nothing wrong with feeling that way about a woman youve been in a relationship with for six years. i think the problem is that people misconstrue the dislike by MRA of hypocritical women as a dislike for all women in general, which is definitely not the case. theres also the opinion that MRA are against all feminists, when its only the gender feminists who are actively marginalizing men. equity feminists or individual feminists are honest enough to admit that feminism as a movement has ta…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:17 PM
7

ThaKadinskyPapers 29 Aug 2007 11:23 AM @KurticusMaximus: You're right. Violence is violence. And violence is usually wrong. But I can tell you that I don't feel one ounce of shame for what these women have written for the simple fact that too many of us have experienced the soul shattering fear that comes when you realize a man is evil enough to want to rape you. so apparently, if a woman is scared of what men can do, she can do whatever she feels like. they dont even try to hide the hypocrisy..…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 10:27 PM
3

are you including prison rape? because if you are, then 3 times as many men get raped than women.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:16 PM
2

i completely disagree. people are underestimating the amount of money that employees are losing to "benefits." employers have to match Social Security and Medicare contributions, so thats another 6.2% and 1.45% of income, respectively. if an employer is willing to pay these costs to hire you, they are just as willing to pay it to you in cash as part of your income. theyre spending the same amount regardless, only its going to the government. the employees are just not benefiting. the same thing …
/r/MensRights27/09/11 01:43 AM
1

im against this mainly because i see people who get the flair are just going to get downvoted, regardless of what theyre posting. even the most dedicated of trolls cant help but contribute something worthwhile every now and then. and this could easily scare off people who agree with MRA for the most part but disagree with less prominent issues (circumcision comes to mind). this is the problem with feminism, where they assume that all women must agree with them and tow the line, and if they dont,…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 10:23 PM
1

except thats not how it works. child support can be demanded regardless of marriage. so what you believe is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 09:42 PM
1

um, there are 11 and 12 year old boys who get sold off as well. did you not look at the wikileaks cables? US defense contractors were buying off tribal leaders in Afghanistan by selling them little boys. the tribe leaders would then have the little boys wear dresses and makeup, and have them dance for all the men, until nightfall where they take the boys back to their sleeping quarters. rapists are punished harshly in third world countries. its a necssity in order to maintain civil order. the la…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 10:52 PM
1

the issue of wage gap is black and white. its economics thats being debated, not philosophy. you do not "see" the other side unless they have empirical evidence to defend it.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 10:45 PM
1

being educated does not mean receiving a formal education. it just means someone possessing an education, or having more than average knowledge.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 10:44 PM
1

you also havent taken into account the total number of fat cells in the people in question. someone who has never been fat in their lives will have extremely low number of fat cells and will not gain weight easily. someone who has been obese or even morbidly obese in their lives will have two or three times the average number of fat cells in their bodies. these fat cells NEVER go away (they can be removed through liposuction, however). if they work themselves into shape, lose all the weight, the…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 10:32 PM
1

what information? you have yet to divulge your age, in order to ascertain what time period you were raised. all you did was post an anecdote, then expect all fathers to somehow gain anything from it. its not helpful if your father was able to raise you peacefully over 20 years ago (my guesstimate is that your in your mid-20's, +/-3 years) when it was a completely different era. we are concerned with social perception in the here and now.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 09:39 PM
1

your story is at least 10 years old, if not more so, assuming its even true (i still think youre a feminist troll account). the hysteria brought on by "stranger danger" has only gotten worse in the past decade. that comic you linked is more relevant than your childhood memories. and you claim youre trying to find "common ground", but your comments both in this thread and in the x-post to 2xc have an obvious condescending tone to it. you are attempting to diminish the experiences of fathers in th…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 08:20 PM
1

the basis or defending abortion is that women own their bodies, and have the final say in such decisions. but women do not own their children. they share custody with the fathers until they are adults. women should not be able to give away their kids.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 06:49 PM
1

i couldnt remember from LOST whether Claire was going to get paid for giving up her son, and im too lazy to look it up lol.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 06:44 PM
1

does the mother get any compensation for putting her child up? im curious.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 07:52 AM
3

explain to me how a mother can put up her child for adoption without the biological father's consent? and why would the mother go to all this trouble to deny him custody? and the judges on the court are trying to let this happen are fucking scumbags.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 07:51 AM
2

It is allowable under reddiquitte to share a happy, non-inflammatory story in more than one place. tl;dr I shared a nice, happy story. I wanted to give people something to smile about. Don't get offended by that. reasons to suspect youre a troll seeking to cause controvery between subreddits: 1)Account is less than 24 hours old prior to submission of post 2)Unnecessary sarcasm tacked on to the end of an otherwise heartwarming anecdote 3)Unnecessary hyperbole ("Always" is underlined? why not capi…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 07:42 AM
1

dont you know? when little boys and girls are touched by an older woman, theyre considered "lucky."
/r/MensRights07/09/11 07:30 AM
1

in bryan caplan's book, selfish reasons to have more kids, he talks about how parents have very little effect on how their kids turn out, hence why they should just enjoy their company until they grow up and move out. of course, his book caused a backlash from the "tiger moms" who believe in authoritarian parenting, but thats another thing altogether. anyway, his book was very fascinating and id recommend it.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 07:23 AM
1

this guy is retarded. why did he agree to a misdemeanor? he should not have admitted any guilt so he can sue the county. he deserves financial compensation for those 3 years lost, where he could have been still practicing medicine and serving his community. only once the city forks over a settlement will the people demand the DA go after the lying cunt. this girl needs to see the inside of a prison cell, and will lose her job from the bad publicity. no one wants to be treated by a nurse who can …
/r/MensRights30/08/11 10:37 PM
2

sorry, but i have no sympathy for anyone who blacks out in a frat house. these parties are where rapists proactively seek out those too drunk to resist. to pretend that nobody realizes rape as a possibility is both inexcusable and unbelievable. and i dont mean just women, as men are raped at these events as well.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 05:30 AM
7

the problem is the woman wasnt punished. she committed perjury, yet that charge was dropped. he would have never been covicted in the first place if she hadnt lied under oath
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:49 PM
2

i completely agree with the last sentence of your post. there are way too many "payback feminists" who arent concerned with equality between genders.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 07:03 AM
1

i agree its not anywhere dead, but ive come across a lot of women over the years who distance themselves from the word "feminist" itself, saying they dont identify with them, and preferring instead the broader term "equal rights activist." i didnt really make anything of it, since until fairly recently i didnt really concern myself with MR. so i would say, at the very least, that more and more women are opening their eyes to it.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 07:00 AM
3

they do have a lot of apologists, although nowhere near as many or as extreme as r/feminisms. youre not going to see them defend a female teacher who molested a half dozen 12 year old boys with the excuse "its because of the burden the patriarchy places on women that causes them to lash out like this", as if that makes any sense at all.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 06:55 AM
4

the equal rights amendment would have changed this, but its been opposed time and again by women.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 02:04 AM
3

statutory rape is consensual sex. if it wasnt, the accused would face additional charges. just because its consensual doesnt mean the law gets to be ignored when the genders are politically incovenient.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 04:45 PM
28

what i find appalling is that women in the comments of DM are saying its okay for them to have underage sex with boys because men cant get pregnant. apparently sexism is the new equality. and they also had the gall to use the excuse that if he wasnt gay, the boy in question would have enjoyed it. now imagine if a man tried to used the phrase "she enjoyed it" to defend his relationship with a young girl? the lengths women will go to defend female pedophiles is frightening.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 04:39 PM
3

how the hell is prostitution the equivalent of underage sex? prostitution should be decriminalized as it is in more civilized societies. as long as its illegal, women will be abused, not to mention the money they make will be siphoned off by pimps. the reason underage sex is illegal is to prevent adults from abusing their position of authority.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 04:31 PM
8

she wasnt his teacher. she was a friend of his mother who he got drunk with and banged in his living room.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 04:24 PM
3

This is horrible story but DM I beg of you to stop reporting these stores as if they are huge news! The constant reporting of stories of false rape claims only goes to put actual rape victims in fear of coming forwards. There are far more rapes than false rape claims, but searching for rape on the DM website yields almost 3 times as many stories about false claims than actual rapes. As horrific as this woman's act was - it doesn't happen nearly as much as the Mail would have you believe! its alw…
/r/MensRights04/03/11 11:04 AM
3

that only works if men also get breaks on other issues. instead, depending on the state, they have to pay for certain risks, like pregnancy, even though the chance is 0%. honestly, states are what screw up health insurance more than anyone, but federal government will always take the blame.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 07:51 PM
1

he cant help that he was born June 9th.
/r/seduction28/02/11 10:54 AM
1

with the amount of public debt they have, having the working force decrease in size so rapidly is anything but a good thing.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 07:58 PM
2

ive never even heard of that before. where exactly do you live, if you dont mind me asking? edit:just googled, and its apparently common in many countries. this is just really surprising.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 06:55 PM
-2

sorry, thats not really true. otherwise a persons income would never be a deciding factor when it comes to marriage, when it almost always is.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 11:46 PM
1

i really dont think you know what a partnership is.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 11:43 PM
2

nobody is forced to get married. i dont feel sympathy for anyone who gets married without a prenup, especially since these days you can have one made while still married if you didnt have one before the marriage.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 11:41 PM
-1

that logic only works if both spouses were working while they were married, and contributed to the wealth accumulation throughout the marriage, which is obviously not the case in this situation.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 11:38 PM
4

there are men who go after wealthy women as well. just because most gold diggers are women doesnt mean all of them are.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 11:35 PM
1

do you have any links to reforms you think should happen? everyone agrees the family courts are a joke, but i havent really seen any ideas on what exactly needs to be done.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:37 PM
1

whats sad is that when all the fighting is going on, the guy steals their food and laughs in front of the camera. like...wtf?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 08:41 PM
2

i dont think she should be given any prison time, as thats just an even further waste of money. i rather it was calculated how many police manhours she wasted and have her fined with the cost, rather than the rest of taxpayers having to pay for her lies.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 07:49 AM
3

it is not in the well-being of children if theyre only being born specifically so their mothers can leech off their child support.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 09:32 PM
3

that doesnt make sense. if the sperm was a "gift", then how is he responsible for the baby and being forced to pay child support? either hes responsible for the child, and can sue her for getting pregnant with his sperm without his consent, or hes not responsible for the child at all. how can the legal system so blatantly contradict itself? regardless, that kid is going to grow up fucked up. nothing like finding out your mother stole your fathers sperm to screw someone up.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 09:29 PM
9

yeah, but in that episode, i thought if the guy was stupid enough to believe that crap, he deserved no sympathy.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 03:06 PM
6

this is like the exact opposite of the article i read about social life in Russia. because women outnumber men by so much, they would never consider divorce. so the men can have as many affairs as they want and the wives just look the other way. the important lesson from China and Russia (and i think India as well?) is that countries that dont have the ideal 1:1 sex ratio have unintended social consequences.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 06:55 PM
1

who the fuck wants to marry a woman like that?
/r/MensRights24/01/11 01:38 AM
5

no point in taking the author seriously. she even refuses to believe in parental alienation, and the commentators who have gone through it themselves are rightfully attacking her for it.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 12:30 PM
0

i envy that Old Man Philly feels that way about his wife. the phrase "a good woman is hard to find" rings truer with each passing day.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 05:27 PM
2

the article is stupid, with no logical arguments defending the author's hatred of men. however, the comments trying to defend the article are hilarious.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 05:37 AM
1

I believe men and women should be equal. That is feminism. Raging against feminism only discredits your cause. For all the legitimate experiences in this subreddit, blaming true feminism hurts. The majority of feminists do not wish men harm, only the obnoxious loud ones that make me want to punch them. this is blatantly wrong. "raging" against feminism does not hurt MR at all. it doesnt make men misogynistic to bring awareness to inequalities. the fact is, the only reason MR has picked up steam …
/r/MensRights15/01/11 02:08 AM
2

Claiming that "Mens rights" evolved out of the womens rights movement, and being proud of earning scorn, reminds me of people clambering for "white rights" evolving out of the civil rights movement one of the best revisioning of history by feminists is that they have always been accepting of minority women, when in fact their entire movement was only concerned with white women. best example is with Sojourner Truth's speech at a women's convention. the truth was that she was booed and hissed, and…
/r/MensRights15/01/11 01:41 AM
7

this might be news to you, but there are men who wear makeup. there are also men who are only interested in other men. also, 55% of women have swallowed male urine at one point in there lives, so i dont see what was offensive about the urinal. note:i can make up bullshit statistics too.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 06:38 PM
1

that is a troll account. im disappointed you willingly overlooked that.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 03:55 AM
6

and does not reflect her current views on the issue of male rape survivors. thats like saying something extremely racist, then following it up with "just kidding." that doesnt suddenly make it alright. she only corrected herself because her argument was 100% flawed. it doesnt mean she no longer believes what she originally said, or that it was okay to say it in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 07:13 PM
2

three times more men get raped than women in the US. so the feminist argument already doesnt make sensee, unless they dont want to count prison rape.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 07:07 PM
1

not every woman is a radical feminist. generalizations do not further healthy discussions.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 06:50 PM
2

Emotional break-down: No-one helped Liz Jones when her power-steering failed (posed by model) its hilarious that she didnt pose herself. doesnt that say it all? as for "chivalry is dead", well yeah, because chivalry doesnt get you laid. subtly putting down women does that. i know feminists love to speak on behalf of all women, but their knowledge of the real world is sometimes startling lacking.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 07:32 AM
22

thats complete bullshit. you need to pick an age of consent and stick to it for both genders or its discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 02:45 AM
6

i dont care if a student is 20. a teacher sleeping with his or her students is a complete conflict of interest. wait until they graduate at least, whenever that is. if they have some twisted need to sleep with members of the student body, they should look for work in colleges.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 02:36 AM
3

they have two children though.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 02:31 AM
1

ive never even heard of this program before. looking at the site, it came to be in 2001. and just watching the three videos, it doesnt seem like it teaches anything worthwhile. just women flailing at someone in a plastic suit. how is that applicable in real life? if there isnt sparring between two unguarded people, its worthless. people who dont know how to throw a proper punch are the ones who break their fists. not only that, theres actually "aerosol defense" and "keychain kubotan" courses? i …
/r/MensRights06/01/11 04:11 PM
1

and they hate it when women who are too good-looking get hired over women who are not, like with Olivia Munn.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 06:42 PM
0

this is awesome. because shes going to lose custody of her child to her first ex-husband for having an affair with her abusive second ex-husband, so shes suing her third ex-husband out of revenge? i mean...how petty can you be?
/r/MensRights28/12/10 11:31 PM
7

im guessing because some think this investigation wouldnt have been buried if the slain child was a girl.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 09:39 PM
12

as someone who doesnt believe in marriage and has no interest in having kids, i originally thought MRA was just a bunch of men suckered into marriage, got screwed in the divorce, and whining about it afterward. my thoughts changed completely though when a very good friend of mine was accused of rape. it took almost a year, but he got off only after her mother came forward and said her daughter was a vindictive liar. i dont even want to think about how things would have turned out if her mother h…
/r/MensRights24/12/10 12:50 AM
4

am i the only one who thinks this guy made this story up to get back at his former employers for firing him?
/r/MensRights23/12/10 06:46 AM
1

i personally think if a woman lies about being raped, every day until she tells the truth or until shes found out, should be added up and spent in prison. i would give a grace period of like a week or two to tell the truth. but on the 15th day, it would be 15 day sentence, after two months, a two month sentence, etc. and if it takes a year for the prosecutor to prove the woman was lying, then a one year sentence. this whole equitable thing is never going to be accepted, so might as well come up …
/r/MensRights18/12/10 05:12 PM
2

cant you just say Michael Moore instead of "uber-progressive?" anyway, if there was ever a case for mens rights and womens rights to come together, this would be it. this case should be focal point of why both rape victims and the accused should have their names sealed until the end of the trial. mens rights would support this to protect the man if he is being falsely accused. and womens rights would agree with this in case the man is someone famous. as weve already seen with this case, the majo…
/r/MensRights17/12/10 05:37 PM
2

i dont know. can we blame women who take advantage of the system? its not like every single woman who collects child support is a hardcore feminist. but it is aggravating when women try to defend the current system as just. the sooner the system is corrected, the better.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 04:14 PM
3

yeah, i thought we didnt. just did a little research, and its still legal in Nevada, mainly because of Las Vegas. its still bullshit though.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 03:44 PM
3

i dont get this. did the US not get rid of debtors prison 200 years ago because it was inhumane? why is it okay when its a man who cant afford child support?
/r/MensRights17/12/10 03:42 PM
2

because the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the USA Today are not the same people?
/r/MensRights17/12/10 01:34 AM
2

that was not the point of the study. the study's sole purpose was to gauge the rate of sexual abuse in juvenile prisons, not to prove whether women also have the propensity to be pedophiles, which we already know to be true. theres a time and a place for everything, but this article is about the poor treatment of our misguided youth.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:44 PM
2

youre angry it doesnt make a bigger deal about the rapists being female? how petty can you be? i think this is more youth rights than mens rights, as im sure the same happens in female detention centers by male staff. this whole thing is still outrageous nonetheless.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 10:48 PM
1

they get laughed at. except when a man gets the woman pregnant. then they have to pay child support to their rapist.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 06:24 PM
1

have you read about Papau New Guinea? the women over there have raped adolescent boys with knives pointed at their throats. and you dont think that could happen on a global scale in a matriarchy? the idea that women arent just as violent as men is just bullshit. emotions are not dependent on gender. edit:heh, i guess i should have clicked the link before replying.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 03:19 PM
2

but its not even about holding out for a better guy. how many times has a woman lied about being raped so her boyfriend wouldnt know she cheated on him? isnt that one of the dumbest reasons to lie about rape? and yet somehow its being accepted by mainstream.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 04:42 PM
2

its sad youre being downvoted. im guessing other women on here dont agree with you.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 01:35 PM
2

so even though "the patriarchy" is so oppressive, a matriarchy would be completely different? is this another bullshit feminist notion, like there would be no wars if women ran the world, despite the fact that women were shaming men into enlisting back in world war I?
/r/MensRights15/12/10 01:33 PM
0

its best explained in the words of Dr Dre, "you cant make a hoe a housewife."
/r/MensRights15/12/10 01:22 PM
2

but its not all women. her numbers referred to just the district of new york state she was d.a. for. i agree if she said 40% of all cases in the US, that it would be way off, as these numbers would undoubtedly vary from city to city, state to state, and would just be over-generalization of the issue.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 07:16 PM
1

how easy is it for a married woman to apply for credit that the husband doesnt know about? ive never thought about this before.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 06:10 PM
1

ive been googling for it, but its tough finding it without knowing her name.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 06:02 PM
6

no, she meant, the women actually straight out confess that they lied, which is really the only foolproof way of knowing that its false rape.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:45 PM
8

i remember a retired new york da said the number of false rape accusation while she was in charge was actually just shy of 40%. if feminists are saying its 6%, then im inclined to believe its over 4 times that much for the country, and even then, 25% seems low. what a world we live in where once esteemed political movement pushing for equality now skew crime statistics.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:03 PM
5

eh, theres no way this guy isnt going to get the full money. he was denied DNA testing in '94. so even if the charges were an "honest mistake", he should have been out 16 years ago. theres very little NYC can do about this. as a new yorker, it pisses me off that my ridiculously high taxes are going to pay off injustice like this. should have never happened in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 12:20 PM
1

what the hell we're better?
/r/MensRights12/12/10 03:16 PM
3

its a very old tradition that the Taliban purged from Afghanistan. now that there are pmc's (taxpayer funded, of course) there protecting them, these warlords are bringing it back. makes you wonder what they hell were even doing there anymore.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 11:55 AM
2

Look like a capitalist, live like a communist, fight like a fascist, and fuck like an anarchist.” awesome line.
/r/seduction11/12/10 04:20 AM
1

thats not my point. even if a man isnt abusive, they still lose custody. why do women fight for custody in those instances? why not just do shared parenting? turning every aspect of divorce into a battle benefits no one but the lawyers.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 03:46 AM
1

actually, what i think is hilarious is that the US government is getting blamed for the actions of two crazed Scandinavian feminists.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 08:25 PM
3

i hate Assange and am tired of him being out to be a hero. but women who use false rape as revenge are pure evil. i dont care what bullshit excuse they come up with to defend themselves, nothing will change my mind that these feminists deserve jail time.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 05:21 PM
1

so because you never met someone this happened to, it doesnt happen? what world do you live in? have you ever met a racist? a terrorist? a human trafficker? if you havent met any, they cant possibly exist then right? you are such a deluded woman, its just sad and pathetic. and when exactly is it in the child's best interest that a woman "fight" for custody? because lying that your husband is abusive, then convincing your child to repeat the same nonsense in court, is not in the child's best inte…
/r/MensRights10/12/10 10:53 AM
2

there is no prejudice. most women are not sensible when it comes to divorce. this is fact. they feel no shame about lying about domestic abuse and filing a restraining order, all so they can get full child custody and get higher child support. they think its okay to do anything and everything to deny a loving father his visitation rights. or are you trying to say these are sensible actions? youre trying to make me out to be sexist and failing. even if what i described didnt apply to your divorce…
/r/MensRights09/12/10 10:30 PM
3

yeah, amicability had nothing to do with it. your ex was sensible, unlike most women. he didnt feel bleeding you dry, using a bullshit excuse like he "was accustomed to certain lifestyle that he could not attain on his own." just goes to show you, men have integrity. with that said, hes also a dumbass, as men need to collect alimony when they qualify. its the only way to get rid of this financial slavery.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 08:55 PM
1

outside of abortion, i dont think feminists have anything left to fight for. its why im pro-choice, so the "feminist movement" can finally die already. meanwhile, mensrights have a shit ton to fight-paternity fraud, child support-induced bankruptcy, ridiculously high/long alimony, and something to curb the ever growing number of false rape accusers. but telling women that men are being marginalized by them is sexist. i dont really understand it.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 08:00 PM
1

so are you paying him alimony? because otherwise alimony is still bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 07:45 PM
2

wait, what exactly is your point? are you trying to say 16 year old girls today arent having sex with adults or arent taking drugs? because they are. heck, these days, kids lose their virginity as young as 14. overall, what the age of consent was 50 years ago is irrelevant. youre saying that taking the word of a 16 year old girl at face value and immediately arresting the men is perfectly acceptable. but when they lie, theyre too young to take responsibility. you cant have it both ways.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 02:02 PM
1

thats the problem. those intial 24-48 hours where men are detained and assumed to be a rapist can never be gotten back. no one should able to throw someone in jail over nothing. if these men couldnt have afforded bail, theyd be in prison all these months.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 01:55 PM
3

uh, no, thats not what happened. the prosecution wanted her name released, but the judge said no, because shes young, and still has a long life ahead of her.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 05:16 AM
-1

sorry, thats not how it works. people making judgments based on actions, not on possible happenstance. theres a reason why its ridiculously easy for women to get restraining orders. saying that its okay for her lie about being raped by three men because she could be afraid of her possibly abusive boyfriend is the fucking stupidest thing ive ever read in this subreddit, by far.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 05:13 AM
1

it means the courts have to put the accuser under higher scrutiny to insure that she is not another women seeking revenge over some lover's quarrel. dont blame the courts, blame the crazed women who think this is somehow an acceptable use of taxpayer dollars. the court does not care if your boyfriend is a cheating douche. thats your fault for dating him.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 05:09 AM
1

eh. whenever someone who was wrongfully convicted and sent to prison are later exonerated, they are at least given financial restitution depending on how many years they were in prison. with false rape accusations, however, people suffer well before they are convicted, and if theyre found innocent, theyre told just told oops, my bad. its ridiculous.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 05:04 AM
1

theres a reason that people go to jail for perjury. it makes a mockery of the court system, which is exactly what all these false rape accusations are doing as well.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 04:58 AM
4

again, if she was raped, there would be physical proof. it wouldnt be, oh the defendant is innocent, youre going to jail. and secondly, there would be a second case, where she would be charged with lying. even if she did lie, it would still have to be proven. but at the very least, it would be on record. youre entire post is an exaggeration.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 04:57 AM
3

if she fails to prove the defendant raped her, that doesnt mean shes lying. if the prosecution finds she was lying about any rape taking place at all, then she deserves jail time. there are no special circumstances for which that is acceptable.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 04:53 AM
3

there was a 14 year old American teen who was arrested for being a drug cartel hitman. its 2010, age really means nothing these day.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 04:47 AM
1

what i dont understand is that she doesnt bother to consider if the women she interviewed might kidnap her child. not everyone who takes a child wants to molest them. its happened quite often, yet people are always so shocked that a woman kidnapped an infant.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 06:56 AM
5

did you read the same article i did? it came off as a woman who felt guilty about turning down a man for babysitting her daughter 3 hours a day and decided to find a bunch of similar and recent situations where men are marginalized and shifted the whole blame away from women and onto "society." society isnt sexist, people are. at least come out and admit it. acknowledging the situation was wrong but refusing to accept she herself was in the wrong because she "was just trusting her gut instincts"…
/r/MensRights07/12/10 03:15 AM
3

Mike said he has been back and forth with lawyers, however, he firmly believes the court system is not the way to deal with families. It is costly, adversarial and does more to divide than to rehabilitate families, he said. obviously. theres a reason why divorce law is the most profitable legal practice.
/r/MensRights05/12/10 06:59 PM
47

fuck everyone. shes your sister, dont feel bad about taking pictures. years ago i took care of my baby cousin for a good 4-5 months. i took a ton of pictures of her during that time. later on, my douchebag cousin wiped my hard drive (99.99% sure he got a virus from watching porn) and i lost all those pictures. i thought i was over it, but then she got leukemia and passed away just last year. lifes too short and kids grow up fast. dont take things for granted.
/r/MensRights05/12/10 02:41 AM
9

it could be intentional in order to lure in feminists.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 02:29 AM
-3

yeah, but everyone is so quick to assume that hes being set up, even before it was found out that his accuser was a crazed feminist. i would say the chances are much better that he is just an egotistical rapist than the CIA setting him up.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 01:22 PM
2

yeah, because the CIA needs to worry about Julian Assange releasing more files about Alpha Sigma Tau or another Sarah Palin email account. seriously, Assange would still be a nobody without Bradley Manning. and now everyone is dickriding this guy while Manning is locked away in prison. such bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 12:10 PM
3

was just going to mention this. i think the OP has no proof of feminism in withholding of the defendant's name, and i was just going to ignore this, but that part pissed me off. the school worker molested 6 11 year old boys. she is a pedophile in every sense of the word. that Greenberg guy is a fucking asshole.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 12:09 PM
1

These seem to be the same guys who think it's ridiculous that small children can't carry concealed weapons, but fear their kid is in danger if asked to walk through a scanner twice a year. umm, i think children shouldnt carry concealed weapons NOR should they be forced to be doused with radiation that is not medically necessary. what a stupid article full of inane generalizations.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 04:25 AM
1

i liked how the judge said the father is a racist, so its okay to do away with the will. im confused how he evens knows that, or why its even irrelevant.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 10:08 PM
2

people get written out of their parents' will all the time. if youre a screwup, thats usually what happens. im not saying the daughters are screwups. ive been reading up on this from other sites, and it sounds like the father didnt like his son-in-laws, and that they all refused to visit him. and ive said this already (although i dont know why i got downvoted), but this isnt even a gender issue, its a legal issue. the whole point someone writes a will is to know that the executor you appoint wil…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 10:06 PM
0

im confused? how is this even a gender issue? it says in the will that only the son took care of him. did the daughters think theyd still get inheritance if they ignored him? whether he "terrorized" his daughters when he raised them is irrelevant. this whole thing is complete bullshit. i cant believe men cant even decide where their money goes even when they die.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 10:38 AM
1

i think this is sort of eye-opening in the sense that i dont remember ever hearing of the female equivalent of polygamy. its just men are horndogs and women sadly have to deal with it. now it sort of all makes sense. although in a way, its kind of not fair for men. look at it this way, a woman knows when a man has settled down when he has stopped dating multiple women and is only with one woman. he has effectively gone from polygamy to monogamy. on the other hand, men never know if their relatio…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 08:42 AM
0

i think its more of the fact that if a guy cheats on his wife with his secretary/coworker, etc, hes a douchebag. but if a woman cheats on her husband with her boss/coworker/etc., its okay, because "her husband doesnt satisfy her needs" or "she was trapped in a loveless marriage," just to name a few of the cliche' divorce statements. male adulterers being met with disdain, while female adulterers are sympathized with could be looked at as indirectly supporting adultery for women only.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 08:34 AM
2

The Commitment Phobe: This guy pretends to be happy on his own, living large as a bachelor, just like his hero George Clooney, but he’s actually just terrified of letting a woman get to know the real him. i was with them up until this one. there is nothing wrong with George Clooney being single. the guy loves it, hes happy, whats wrong with that? does it bother them that a highly desirable straight guy can be happy without being tied down? this guy can have any women he wants today, tomorrow, an…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 05:21 AM
1

im confused why drug dealers singled out this guy specifically.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:56 AM
1

im glad his wife didnt leave him and friends stuck by him, but in most cases, the exact opposite happens. its why i think women who make false rape claims need to be sentenced severely.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:55 AM
33

what happened to just beating a kid when they do something wrong? hot sauce and cold showers seem like torture. with that said, my dad used to sit me down and just talk with me rationally when i did something wrong. i would feel like such a piece of shit at the end of these talks that i would wish he had actually beat me instead. i did get beat though, but only when i fought with my brothers. he was pretty big on family, which he drilled into me pretty well since i now feel the same way.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 04:18 AM
2

isnt the reason that MRA has gotten serious traction over the past years because a good chunk of women have seen how much men have been marginalized by the government/society, and joined the cause? especially when these same women get branded as "traitors" by the feminists, shouldnt we be embracing these women instead of ostracizing them as well?
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:42 AM
2

in some species of arachnids, male spiders are eaten by their mates right after impregnating them.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:16 AM
1

all that shows is that Muslim couples all name their kids Muhammed. not completely sure, but i believe theres some famous figure in their religion that shares the same name. should we do a poll on how many boys in Mexico are named Jesus? besides, that still doesnt mean that Muslims are outbreeding anyone. it just means they lack originality when it comes to naming their sons.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 11:58 PM
6

but that makes sense. losing your license makes it harder to work, and could even cost you your job. how exactly does further lowering the ability for men to keep up with payments benefit the child?
/r/MensRights29/11/10 08:10 PM
1

none of the circumcised guys ive ever asked had a problem with the circumcision itself. it was more of the fact that cosmetic companies make the high-end of 5 figures in profits every time a baby boy is snipped that bothered them.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 03:05 AM
2

i would say praise every monotheistic god out there.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 02:33 AM
2

that case is so outrageous, im just saddened by the whole thing. and yet feminists say nothing is wrong with the system, or that it doesnt go far enough. its just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/11/10 02:46 AM
13

I would have done absolutely the same as the ex wife in the story...My ex husband only pays me £2000 for my daughters.. Summer age 6 and Victoria age 4..... From this money I have to run 2 cars, dine out a few times a week, have my hair done .. pay the gardener and cleaner and scrape for our family holiday to Florida etc etc.... It's a disgrace that men get away with everything and do not pay as they should.....I would have definitely asked for 3/4 of the win...It is a mans job to provide for hi…
/r/MensRights22/11/10 08:19 PM
1

fucking awesome tl;dr.
/r/seduction08/11/10 11:14 PM
2

it pisses me off about the amount of wrongful convictions in New York. those 5 kids from the Central Park Jogger case still have a lawsuit pending against the city, and who knows how ridiculous the settlement is going to be. people are so quick to hate on the cops everywhere, but the DA offices of each city/town are just as much to blame.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter