TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tryfirstthensucceed Archive

View 2 posts and 68 comments by tryfirstthensucceed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What working process did you expect to hear? If you want someone to say just do X and Y and then when they hit you with Z you respond with Q and R, then you do not get to go your own way. The working process is you telling your government who you are, not what the Internet has told you a judge wants to hear. What would have put people in jail is if I said exactly what I did and they attempted it. Then you would have came back and said "see it doesn't work". There is no upside for me to tell you …
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 10:23 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 01:00 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:58 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:58 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:57 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:57 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:57 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:56 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:56 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:56 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:56 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:56 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:56 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:56 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:55 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:55 PM
1

Why do you want to know my process? It sounds like you are already quite competent to figure out what needs to be done. There is no magical packet or formula that will put fear of legal reprisal into the minds of corrupt men. You must make them fear you, you must hold them to the law, you must make consequences for not doing their jobs costly. If you are on the fence about your own ability and mental compacity, then I wouldn't recommend do anything but what you are told to do.
/r/MGTOW18/07/17 12:55 PM
1

I do not know what a sovereign citizen is. Are you referring to the Sovereign Citizen Movement? I am not a part of that so I can't comment on their 'technique'. As far as the State of Georgia, that is not how the government is structured. What you described more closely resembled the Peoples Republic of North Korea, where the rights of the people are only applicable to those that obey it's laws created by the delegates of the Labor Union. The several states of the Union are governed by the Const…
/r/MGTOW16/07/17 10:04 PM
1

The world doesn't care about your excuses, only whether you do or do not do a thing. You ARE joining the enemy. You ARE NOT going your own way. Think about that the next time you read about how women will have sex with the enemy when the tribe is conquered.
/r/MGTOW14/07/17 03:31 PM
2

OK, then don't go your own way. I have, and it's hard work, not for the dumb lazy. There are good people in the government, but you have to make it so their hands are tied to help you.
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 09:10 PM
-2

The only way I know of to receive leniency in the courts is to have diplomatic immunity. Thats not what I'm talking about. But, as far as I know, the law apply to everybody in every western countries. Yes the supreme Law of the Land. In America, this is Common Law. And by law you have no way to refuse paying child support if a court order you to do it. By Private Law, not the Law of the Land, you have no way to refuse paying child support, if you agreed to pay child support directly or by enfran…
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 04:21 PM
-2

The risk of miscarriage. The risk of permanent injury or death upon delivery. The scars of emotional baggage from elevated hormones. Did I leave anything out that could be included in "100%" that men don't have? Just because bringing a child to term has a reduced relative risk, pain, suffering from 500 years ago does reduce the percentage of that risk, pain, suffering incurred by the female that is not incurred by the male.
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 03:44 PM
-9

I'm not dense. I'm informed. You didn't address any of my points. Just attacked me personally, then followed up with some drivel about everything you already thought. If you want to have an intelligent conversation, address my strong argument with actual facts that I can respond with. Otherwise, you are just jerking yourself off and I don't care to watch.
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 03:41 PM
-8

Its not a law of the country you live in. Its a law of the private organization that works exclusively with the government and employs it as the agent to carry out its private obligations. Abide by the laws of the country you live in by following the laws of the country you live in. Destroy the foreign enemy that wants to enslave you by obstructing their hold on you. That is what being a man is all about. That is what this sub is about. Don't ever loose sight of that and dumb it down with your e…
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 01:43 PM
2

I am willing to call a spade a spade. I am not willing to generalize all tools as spades just because a most of them are rotten. Its not about hurting anybody's feelings: I really couldn't care any less about the feelings of strangers on the internet, its about cultivating strong arguments in order to become a better person. Pointing fingers never worked in grade school because it was a way to manipulate peoples emotions. Calling all <insert group label> anything in a hatred way will brew contem…
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 01:38 PM
1

It doesn't work that way, fortunately. Child support is private law. A man can already opt out of all private law, this includes income taxation, social security, drivers license, etc. These are all laws that apply to the man because he "knowingly" and "willingly" accepted them. A womens ability to abort her fetus is a privacy right. It is a requirement of the government to honor the rights of humans. Since child support to a women is not a right of the women, then men are not obligated in any w…
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 01:34 PM
-14

The female takes 100% of the risk with having children and bringing it to term. Therfore, they should have 100% of the decision on what to do with their bodys. Abortion is not a right, the privacy of the individual is the right. We cannot overturn Roe v. Wade or its consequences would be far reaching. Additionally, the right of a man already exists to avoid child support. Since, supporting a child through the state is private law, then one must not have that law apply to them. It is not common l…
/r/MGTOW13/07/17 01:27 PM
5

Yeah, I don't think your assessment is correct. Men don't necessarily want to be violent in bed. I think that women do, for the most part, want a violent, rollercoaster ride sex life though. And men will provider her what she wants. Maybe thats what you are seeing, a well mannered man becomes aggressive when he sees it working for other males that way around him. My example: I had always been gentle and kind spirited. But my lost wife (who was a virgin when we met) wanted increasingly higher oct…
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 03:11 PM
8

Trust is not necessarily a dangerous concept. It only becomes reckless when you apply it without reason. I think it would be better stated as: Don't trust anyone blindly, instead assess why you would want to trust them and what they would benefit from the relationship. For example, I don't trust a car salesman, because I know they would screw me over royally to make a few extra bucks on commission. The relationship is sour because of laws that prevent manufacturers from selling to you, the consu…
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 02:01 PM
17

Join me brother in the never ending fight to overcome complacency and convenience. Regain your sovereignty and rescind your government enfranchisement. The road will be difficult and matched with adversaries that want to see you suffer, but the reward will be greater.
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 01:54 PM
3

Ok, you've hit the deep end. I'm not even saying that I disagree either: see my first response to you.
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 01:51 PM
3

I would prefer to care for a women, protect her, satiate her in all the ways that I can. If I do that, she will become spoiled and unable to reciprocate in any way. So no, there is no resistance. I choose to spend my wealth and physical prowess how I want. If that is doting on a special women, then great, but now I know better then to think long term with them.
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 01:49 PM
1

Commonly, jews exhibit semitic features, but thats also true of many middle eastern people. Becoming a jew is a voluntary act, regardless if your parents ascribed.
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 01:45 PM
9

Look, I get it. But you will just not win over minds with blaming religious groups, no matter how corrupt/appalling/oppressive/dirty/perpetually victimized they are. People will understand your point without the finger pointing, and even more so when they organically attribute your strong arguments to specific groups organically on their own without influence. Sure, you'll loose some to the other side, but they were never set to hear you out anyways, so leave to their own devices then.
/r/MGTOW12/07/17 01:35 PM
9

Its true, but even well off women with decent careers and no debt are shying away. Do you think it has something to do with the hive-mind mentality that they cannot escape from? I would like to understand that better to penetrate potential patriots.
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 10:23 PM
71

Sadly, its all too true. Women and the men they convince, will knowingly sacrifice their futures for something today. I've debated this with modern women and they don't even disagree with it; just end the conversation with something to the effect of "Well, we are all doomed anyways, so we might as well enjoy it". And thats it, socialism, capitalizing the hard work of our children and grandchildren, government programs all designed to enslave us. The people that figure it out simply disregard due…
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 10:13 PM
4

I think he means, you argued your way out of a good grade.
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 10:02 PM
3

Now that you mention it, her smile does seem maniacal and her eye lids had blue eyeliner (maybe aposematism). Additionally, I found it disturbing that she wants someone poor who had experienced "deep loss". Who the hell wants that characteristic!?
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 09:29 PM
2

Can't express thought beyond what other women say they want. Sounds par for the course.
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 09:21 PM
1

Interesting observations. The semantics of her wants and needs are even as basic as she is!
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 09:20 PM
5

Does this imply that if a man buys an engagement ring for a women that he should expect something in return? Or is she saying the obvious, that she gives only after receiving?
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 06:31 PM
3

Could be a great anti-suicide poster for high schools.
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 06:16 PM
3

Lets just assume shes worth all the effort and omit sense and logic because vagina
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 05:54 PM
2

Sounds like a precursor for meglomania
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 05:53 PM
3

At least a 9/10
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 05:50 PM
4

Yeah, and the comments are priceless, "She cared about him thats why she was upset, because she hated him working so much."
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 05:45 PM
8

gatekeeping thats a new term for me, thx
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 05:33 PM
8

She is tired of all the boys that won't listen to her nag endlessly and rack up the credit card bill
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 03:43 PM
11

<25 and >42 Translation: Not too young to be able to support me financially, but also not wise enough to see my scam
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 03:22 PM
4

Heh, yeah thought it was strange that her "About Me" is a list of demands for her next victim and a blurb about "Everyone likes me, so I don't need to tell you anything." Over-the-top egotistical.
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 02:36 PM
5

Yeah, seems as though feminism created the mindset in obese single moms that a REAL man is a walking wallet with no morality, no independent thought, no going against the grain, pay for all my bad decisions MAN
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 02:34 PM
2

Definitely disease free
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 02:32 PM
3

That was my take away too. "a real man that wants a baby as much as I do", can't even hide the fact
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 02:31 PM
65

Funny how she talks about what men are laking now a days "hard work", "strong character", etc, but then she is advising all women to "Just be wild and not worry about anything". Psshh, AWALT
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 02:27 PM
1

Comment for this post? https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/6mm6fq/best_of_online_dating_divorced_with_2_kids/
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 02:07 PM
1

Streamable mirror for those uninterested in being tracked https://streamable.com/1g6xl
/r/MGTOW09/07/17 06:08 PM
1

Ask your parents "What may I do to repay you for the life you have given me." More then likely, they will say something along the lines of "Nothing, we love you no matter what you do." Then, you have absolved any additional matters that they may guilt you with in the future. You have to do this or a fair consideration for consignment of your life, i.e. Marriage, is assumed. They longer you leave your intentions off the table, the harder it will come down to them when you reveal what you are abou…
/r/MGTOW17/06/17 04:43 AM
1

You have a lot of vague points in your post to really provide any constructive advice. The following is what I have done. Firstly, find the best possible way to express yourself, an interesting hobby perhaps, and spend time understanding what that means to your life. For me, this was religion, where I avoid the social constructs of mainstream religion, while still finding an intimate connection within my beliefs. Secondly, work hard at earning to your greatest potential. Avoid debt at all costs,…
/r/MGTOW17/06/17 04:28 AM
2

Sadly, your drunk rant is pretty close. But I'll add a little to it. A women in this day is only going to be submissive for as long as it benefits her. If, for instance, she goes out with her AWALT friends and they influence her to grab the easy life from you, then it will subconsciously on her to-do list to screw with you. If you manage to keep her away from all female friends and online communications, they there is a possibility that she will be inclined to stay that way. It boils down to thi…
/r/MGTOW17/06/17 03:30 AM
2

Ok, the system is not perfect, and we both understand that. I'm just not disillusioned into thinking that there will ever be a perfect system to govern humans, because humans can be irrational and non sensical. My argument is that the system we have works well for its intention, but it is being abused because people greedily and selfishly sold off their responsibility to protect it. We now have a bastardization of something that only works well when its being cared for. When the founding fathers…
/r/MGTOW13/06/17 02:32 AM
1

The government is created by us, to protect us. If you set a requirement for that protection, any requirement, then it no longer functions as government, but a corporate mafia where the wealthy are protected and everyone else does not benefit or are essentially 2nd class citizens. I agree with you that our hand-out culture has become some what of a nuisance as of late, but the way to fix that is to quit incentivizing sluethness and disband wealth redistribution mechanisms such as food stamp, une…
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 03:17 AM
1

Not a very strong argument. Care to elaborate? If you believe this is true, then why do you want to commercialize government by requiring corporate profits as a barrier to entry in deciding who is best to protect your interests? Government was institutionalized to protect your rights, but you want to form a corporate charter to protect profits.
/r/MGTOW12/06/17 02:57 AM
1

You don't have a right to taxpayer money, even as a taxpayer. It would be wise to study the law before you make assertions about the legality of other peoples actions.
/r/MGTOW09/06/17 07:09 PM
1

We don't have a democracy. Your argument is flawed because it assumes something that does not exist. Half the population does not get to say what your rights are, they only get a negligible voice in how they way those rights are managed. Since we know that women mostly concern themselves when dealing with resource allocation, we can confidently make the assumption that they are not to be trusted with allocating resources appropriately across a population.
/r/MGTOW09/06/17 06:52 PM
1

Your beliefs will not work because it ensures a disproportionate amount of wealthy citizens create the laws that govern them selves. This is probably the fastest way to a plutocracy that could be done. It would enslave all future generations that do not currently have wealthy families, essentially creating royalty from those that currently do. Please rethink your belief before you unleash a bull in a china shop.
/r/MGTOW09/06/17 06:37 PM
1

By allowing women to vote, you are ensuring they restrict and imprison themselves within their own social programs. Voting isn't a right, its a privilege enjoyed by those that concern themselves with government. When the government creates a right, it is considered a privilege because they have the unlimited capacity to regulate it. By removing their capacity to regulate the rights that they create, you are removing their ability to regulate themselves. Its an utter catastrophe to use emotions w…
/r/MGTOW09/06/17 06:26 PM
1

1) Aligning yourself to a logical path is the only recourse you have to change anything about your world. Stop being a defeatist, thats how we got here in the first place. 2) Not providing a privilege is not the same thing as control. You are removing their ability to control. Forcing women to vote a certain way would be control. 3) See point 1. 4) Yes, they are. We know this because women have a biological need to be provided for and so seek out the most resources. They are all socialist and mu…
/r/MGTOW09/06/17 06:16 PM
1

Its easier to give in to tyrants then it is to be disobedient.
/r/MGTOW09/06/17 06:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter