trying_not_to_swear Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. What do you mean by "counter to him"? The post I responded to was talking about adultery specifically. "If a husband cheats on his wife and they divorce, he shouldn't get her home, her stuff, or her children. He should still be able to get some custody, but he would have to pay child support on top of it. If she was a SAHM she definitely deserves alimony. He's an adult, so he can figure out housing on his own. If they have a car, she should keep it so she can drive the kids to and from school. A…	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 05:35 AM
1	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. I agree in principle, but I think real life is more complicated. What if the wife doesn't cheat, but rather drives her husband to cheat by withholding sex and affection? What if she's terrible and emotionally abusive, but an inexplicably good mother, and he cheats on her with someone who respects him as a human being for the first time in years? But no, he cheated so he should be "held liable" because she technically didn't do anything wrong and he's technically responsible for the marriage endi…	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 05:17 AM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. What are you talking about? Of course the victim is Till. I was pointing out how you didn't even mention the men who actually lynched him, placing all the blame on the woman who lied instead which, honestly, is ridiculous. I don't know how you could have possibly missed the sarcasm. Point is, the woman told a lie, and that sucks, but the real villain(s) of this story are the two men who lynched a child over gossip. Let's say a guy falsely tells his friends that his ex-girlfriend cheated on him t…	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 05:05 AM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. I believe she should be held to the same standard and level of scrutiny as a man would in the same situation, but the idea that men "lose everything" in a divorce an exaggeration I refuse to stand behind regardless of the gender. If a wife cheats on her husband and they divorce, she shouldn't get his home, his stuff, or his children. She should still be able to get some custody, but she would have to pay child support on top of it. If he was a SAHD he definitely deserves alimony. If he wasn't, t…	/r/MensRights	26/03/17 09:13 PM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. If you do adultery and that's the reason for your divorce, then half of your stuff will be automatically surrendered to your wife, especially if you have children together, in addition to alimony, child support, etc.	/r/MensRights	26/03/17 08:00 PM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. That makes perfect sense! This woman put a gun to those guys' heads and demanded them to brutally murder a 14-year old boy, throw his body in the river, lie about it in court, and then brag about it after. Those two men are completely innocent victims, and she's a lying witch who used her magic vagina to incept violent tendencies into their otherwise peaceful and non-racist minds.	/r/MensRights	26/03/17 07:53 PM
1	Can men be objectified sexually? You-- heh-- you really think that's never happened to me a bunch of times before? Hahaha-- That's NOT a hypothetical situation for me! Ahahaha... damn, what a good laugh I just enjoyed Dude, what the hell? Why are you being rude? Sorry I don't share your POV on this, but that's no reason to 1) be an asshole, or 2) purposefully misread my comments just so you can justify your martyr complex. I honestly thought this was an interesting topic to discuss, but it's getting more and more obvious that y…	/r/MensRights	27/02/17 08:59 PM
1	Can men be objectified sexually? Sorry, I know this is three days later, but I haven't logged in until now and I think this topic is interesting... Natural beauty can exist without humans creating it! People like savoring extraordinary images much in the same way that they like savoring tasty things and like savoring pleasing smells! Okay sure, but those weren't the examples you used? I maintain that when you're "admiring" objectects made by people, you're admiring the individual's acheivement. With natural things, are you sure…	/r/MensRights	26/02/17 10:17 PM
1	Can men be objectified sexually? Are you making this contrived stuff up as you go along? ...Yes? I'm definitely just brainstorming. I've never really though about the difference between admiration and objectification before. I was also pretty drunk at the time, so the sloppy commenting doesn't surprise me either. That said, even sober, I do feel like there's a difference, but I definitely didn't mean to give the impression that I had the reasons figured out. I'm just guessing. But I can surely admire beautiful architecture I th…	/r/MensRights	23/02/17 03:46 AM
2	Can men be objectified sexually? What's the difference between "objectification" and "admiration" anyway? Admiration is directed toward people, while objectification is supposed to be directed toward objects? Compare "my new laptop is super thin" to "my new gf is super thin". You don't admire a laptop for its size, because it's an object, but you can admire the people who designed it. If you admire a girl for her size, you're (hopefully) admiring the effort it takes to maintain it. It's passive, and general. Objectification ste…	/r/MensRights	21/02/17 12:51 PM
3	What feminism would stand for if they were for equality Giving away the child without consent of both parents leads and has lead to prosecution. How many of those cases ended with the woman being prosecuted though? It's way harder to give a child away without their mother's knowledge than their fathers. Women don't have to name a father, so there's no way to guarantee that he even knows. If he doesn't know the baby's born, he can't make sure that he's on the birth certificate. The mother could leave him off or name another man the father instead. A m…	/r/MensRights	20/02/17 12:41 AM