TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tunalunalou Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by tunalunalou on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not super into o guys over like 5'10" (I'm 5'3.5"). I would get all interested and then find out you're almost an entire foot taller than me! I'm not anti-tall guys, but it just makes some things harder like holding hands and kissing.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/22 02:01 AM
3

Meh, I'm not quite that doom and gloom. I am much more r/leanfire. Take advantage of the system then go off and do whatever I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 04:46 PM
1

That is the way. Though tbf when I used to be in an office I still was on Reddit 99% of the day. Just got less laundry done.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 04:41 PM
2

If I make the argument that it doesn't matter, I need to state why. And that's what I did. Could I have been clearer? Clearly. But this is Reddit and I'm arguing pointless things while working.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 04:39 PM
3

Your original argument was that women shame men more...which is a specific gender comparison. My argument is that more doesn't matter. I can't prove or deny which gender shames more and I don't care. A valid argument against your argument is that your argument doesn't matter. That's all I'm trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 04:32 PM
3

That doesn't go against anything I have said. If you think shaming is bad, then the shaming done by men is more valuable to you than the shaming done by women. Just because I don't think anyone should be shaming anyone doesn't mean my argument only applies to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 04:26 PM
6

I never made that argument whatsoever. I said that shaming done by men has worse consequences for women than shaming done by other women. So regardless of your opinion of whether the shaming is justified or not and regardless of who shames more, men's shaming is overall a worse impact on those women than women's.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 04:18 PM
7

This has nothing to do with me or my actions. It has to do with basic respect I have for how people choose to live their lives. The post was about shaming women. If you believe women being shamed is a good thing, my points still stand that men's way of shaming is much more impactful to that they're shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 03:55 PM
6

I'm not mad about anything. This isn't TRP and I believe in the people here and on PPD to understand nuance exists in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 03:47 PM
3

It isn't an either or. I know many here like to believe that if you have sex with someone you're somehow now unable to ever commit to anyone, but there are many many people who do just fine in relationships once they've decided to settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 03:41 PM
10

Men would never want to have a relationship with one because it signals she is promiscuous and likely to cheat. ​ Whether or not your premise is true, the impact of men's reaction to "sluts" is far worse than impact of a woman's reaction. If someone makes fun of or shames someone who enjoys casual sex, that has no impact on them except maybe hurt feelings. But if a man makes assumptions and acts on those assumptions, like the quote above, then women are now forced to choose between enjoying casu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 03:34 PM
1

1/3 of women make more than their husbands...I'm not sure how this is news to everyone here. I don't make millions. I just am not attracted to career-driven men, and also believe in having a parent at home with their children and know I wouldn't function well in that role myself. What would you like me to elaborate on?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 12:37 PM
2

I'm not saying I'm attracted to homeless people or guys who still just live in their mother's basement unable to fend for themselves. I'm just attracted to guys who don't make their job their life and who have the skills to make our house a home. I have been swept off my feet with guys like this, it just hasn't worked out for a multitude of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 08:55 AM
1

It's not about taking my money. It isn't my money - it's ours...for our family.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 08:52 AM
2

Are you asking for yourself? Haha. I don't think I've ever met a man who wanted to be a SAHD before. What draws you to the lifestyle?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 04:36 AM
2

Be my person. I am looking for the one, the guy who sweeps me off my feet and is my best friend. I'm not sure he exists, but I haven't given up yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 04:33 AM
4

I'm not attracted at all to career men, and I would like to have a stay at home dad for our kid(s). Obviously I can't guarantee anything without having found my said person yet, but it would be very shocking for me to end up with someone who had more than me and would continue to make more than me since it isn't at all what I want. I guess he could come with an inheritance/trust fund, but that would be up to him if he wanted that to be his money or our family's.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 04:20 AM
7

Any man marrying me will have no problem divorcing me financially...I will be the one "giving" him (lots) of money. And I see absolutely no problem with that, because that's the whole point of getting married and having a family is that the money is for my family. The money I save and earn is for all of us. Why don't men feel the same way?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 03:03 AM
5

Why is that strictly a man problem? Women who came into a marriage with more money also stand to lose "their" money in a divorce. And you can still lose all of that if you aren't married and then separate, but with much fewer protections on both sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 02:54 AM
4

I'm not saying men don't have low standards or that men of equal attractiveness wouldn't do worse, because they do in both instances, but my profile got a lot more attention after I became more outdoorsy (even though I got older and the pics were lower quality) and I got more actual dates, not just matches.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 06:53 PM
2

I assume they don't? I'm not sure what you're getting at. You didn't know what "looking outdoorsy" meant so I clarified that it meant having photos of me being outdoors. I don't know of any other way to appear outdoorsy personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 04:19 PM
4

I didn't get people to match with me at all until I started having photos of me doing physical things. I look the same - if not a little worse since I'm older and the photos are worse quality with being action shots or weird angles/distances. If personality didn't matter at all, I wouldn't have seen a difference after changing which photos I posted. So yes, personality does shape attraction, at least so far as my experience. I agree on the whole, though, that women don't approach (though I do ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:53 PM
3

Sure but that's the same with anyone. Just because you're objectively a 5 doesn't mean you can't be seen as a 7 to someone else. A woman isn't going to approach a man who is objectively a 5 either unless she personally sees him as a 7+. Still doesn't make me not ugly. Just makes me not ugly to a few select people. Specifically, people who see my personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:41 PM
5

I'm really short so anyone over 6' is too tall for me. But generally I agree, and I prefer guys who are taller than me. Regarding weight, I'm very skinnyfat (aka carry all my "excess" weight in my stomach even though I have a normal BMI) so I do turn a lot of guys off with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:33 PM
5

You said if I'm getting attention then I'm not ugly. That to me reads as saying ugly women don't get attention. If you meant something else I'd love more clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:11 PM
5

Sure. I'm definitely around a 5, though, without personality being taken into account, even if that means for some I'm a 3/4 and for some I'm a 6/7. But climbing and hiking and such I think makes me more attractive to guys in general, and hopefully means I come across as that 6/7 because of it, and therefore online they're more likely to want to go on a date with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:09 PM
8

I have been ranked by multiple objective 3rd party people, and have been told straight by guys I'm on dates with that I am. If I was pretty I'd get attention in real life too. It's weird you think ugly women get no attention at all from guys. We just have to approach it differently than attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:07 PM
20

Yeah welcome to reddit 😂 My favorite is the guy who says, "if you we share interests but you ugly I won't talk to you"...okay but isn't that the point of the post that uglier women get less attention?? You can't have it both ways. Women can't both get a ton of attention regardless of attractiveness and also not get attention if they're ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 02:44 PM
11

I never said all outdoorsy guys liked me, just that I have more luck online because of it. 🤷‍♀️ Gotta make up for the ugly somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 02:31 PM
16

I have absolutely no idea what the question is - can you rephrase? And if men can take me rock climbing outdoors and on 14ers, I'm all for it regardless of their motivations. At least the guys I end up meeting in person have proven they know what they're doing before they get any because I usually do something adventurous as a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 01:58 PM
20

Well the men I'm matching with online do, so some men clearly gaf - specifically the men who are also into living the majority of their lives outdoors. Outdoorsy for me means rock climbing, hiking mountains, and kayaking/paddleboarding. That's what all of my pics are of, at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 01:40 PM
39

I'm solidly a 5. I don't get a lot of attention in real life (I have only been catcalled one time ever and I lived in NYC for 5 years), but get a lot of matches online (and I'd say my photos are pretty realistic for what I look like). I'd say it's because I am outdoorsy, which is not easily conveyable walking down the street, but can be portrayed in the activities in my photos. Thank God for guys who like girls who are active but ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 01:11 PM
3

Being in check with your weight also needs to be maintained very regularly. If you want to be attractive to someone, and you're not naturally so, you gotta put in the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 10:38 AM
0

I think age and location have a huge impact on the question. If he's 40, 100 women is about 5/year if he started at 20. Probably leans heavily toward younger years, but that doesn't seem insane to me for a guy with a high sex drive. Especially in places like NYC where the culture leans so much more toward one night stands, and guys are able to get girls a lot easier. If he's 25, then that's way too many. I would be a bit leery if a Midwest boy slept with that many (the effort to even find that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 12:34 PM
1

Worse case a woman finds out and claims rape by deception, even though she's wearing heels/makeup/etc to hide exactly what she looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 03:22 PM
4

It now takes 2 incomes for the most part to afford a home and have a family. Except women earning is what CAUSED this, not the other way around. We're seeing it now in reverse - wages finally increasing because women aren't going back into the workforce, meaning there aren't enough people to compete for low wages, so they have to raise wages.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 02:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter