tuoder Archive

Upvotes	Title	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	Vote up if you lurk here.	tuoder	/r/MensRights	03/08/08 04:50 AM
0	LOUD FEMINISTS - Women's Day	tuoder	/r/MensRights	10/08/08 02:11 AM
0	Women have that nurturing instinct, right?	tuoder	/r/MensRights	08/08/08 02:42 PM
0	[Crosspost from /r/TrollXChromosomes] A guide for men explaining how periods feel	tuoder	/r/MensRights	17/07/12 07:27 PM
0	Hey, remember Equality? Well I've created a subreddit that is an opportunity to try again.	tuoder	/r/MensRights	27/02/09 09:00 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	[Crosspost from /r/TrollXChromosomes] A guide for men explaining how periods feel Someone said it should be posted to see what happens. So I did.	/r/MensRights	17/07/12 07:55 PM
1	Who else is disgusted by this Yeah I don't know. It seems to me quite likely that such opinions would be expressed in a private forum. It being deleted is less likely, certainly, but still possible. I see it this way: 1: Elaborate idea for hoax is generated, complete with vernacular, mocked up, screeenshotted, and posted 2: Ridiculous post found on private forum (through trolling or normal use), screenshotted and posted. I don't know, like I said.	/r/MensRights	08/07/10 09:55 PM
-2	Who else is disgusted by this I see option 2 as going more like this: MRA trolls private radical-feminist forum regularly (known to happen all the time) and goads them into saying something absurd, or captures an absurd conversation. They strike me as equally likely. I don't know. Trolls have ruined the internet, in large part. I can't say I know what's real and what's not (via Poe's Law).	/r/MensRights	08/07/10 09:35 PM
1	Who else is disgusted by this I count 12 points, was that in the negative? I thought it was a rather uncontroversial thing to say. The statement is unsourced. We do not know if it really happened or not. I don't know.	/r/MensRights	08/07/10 09:17 PM
3	Who else is disgusted by this Which seems a simpler explanation to you? It seems simpler to me that this was a private forum, rather than a fabrication. I don't know. Suffice it to say the veracity of this is suspect.	/r/MensRights	08/07/10 09:15 PM
21	Who else is disgusted by this It could be a private forum or one that no longer exists.	/r/MensRights	08/07/10 07:30 PM
0	"Regarding perpetration of violence, more women than men (25 percent versus 11 percent) were responsible. In fact, 71 percent of the instigators in nonreciprocal partner violence were women." More women "hit back", but you don't seem to be complaining about that. I didn't complain about a lot of things, like the layout of Konqueror on Kubuntu, or the state of Nepalese politics. That's a fallacious argument. I'm simply arguing that this does not go into enough detail. Also, it is difficult to generate these statistics accurately at all. The data available is subject to extreme sampling bias. I don't trust any of it thoroughly.	/r/MensRights	28/06/09 03:45 AM
-2	"Regarding perpetration of violence, more women than men (25 percent versus 11 percent) were responsible. In fact, 71 percent of the instigators in nonreciprocal partner violence were women." This statistic focuses on those who do not hit back. I'm saying most men do, but that this statistic excludes them.	/r/MensRights	28/06/09 01:46 AM
-1	"Regarding perpetration of violence, more women than men (25 percent versus 11 percent) were responsible. In fact, 71 percent of the instigators in nonreciprocal partner violence were women." Notice it says nonreciprocal violence. I take this to mean that women don't generally strike unless they are fairly certain their target won't hit back, and that men hit back.	/r/MensRights	27/06/09 11:14 PM
5	Men prefer average sized women over fashion models and Playboy centrefolds claim scientists Yeah I just have zero confidence in popular media's representation of science, especially the Telegraph. I'm too embarrassed to forward the Telegraph to anyone. EDIT: and I'd like to forward this to my girlfriend.	/r/MensRights	13/06/09 01:48 PM
2	Men prefer average sized women over fashion models and Playboy centrefolds claim scientists Anyone have a link to the actual study?	/r/MensRights	13/06/09 01:25 PM
6	Anyone tired of women having three or four kids to two or three different men? of our government putting our fathers in prisons for back child support? or hearing "I'm a single mom"? Lost me here: They usually don't fulfill their Christian or nature's obligation to stay with the father of their children (enough of the abuse speech).	/r/MensRights	03/09/08 01:20 PM
2	Feminists disrupt a forum about battered / abused men Oh they think the group being organized is a masculist group, which to them is a sexist group. So they came to crash the party.	/r/MensRights	10/08/08 07:18 AM
1	Feminists disrupt a forum about battered / abused men Which videos?	/r/MensRights	10/08/08 07:09 AM
2	Feminists disrupt a forum about battered / abused men Well that's good. just did a search for it and that is what I found. The last thing I remember reading about before that is the repeated rejections of their constitution.	/r/MensRights	10/08/08 07:05 AM
3	Feminists disrupt a forum about battered / abused men They thought that an anti-feminist group was forming on campus, and they decided that they didn't want the group to exist, so they got the group shut down.	/r/MensRights	10/08/08 05:21 AM
5	Feminists disrupt a forum about battered / abused men It reminds me of this: http://masculinists.org/updates/030708.html especially the second video.	/r/MensRights	10/08/08 02:03 AM
2	What do you think - is it better to ban people with diverse opinions? I think by diverse, you mean generally opposing, but that changes nothing. Banning you was a tacit admission that you make good points that challenge, and she is scared of you. Let it also be noted that the vast majority of participants in the censorship discussion disagreed with censoring you.	/r/MensRights	08/08/08 03:27 PM
4	If you're in Maine, be careful about your eyes. It seems like this would be difficult to prove, if that helps at all. It seems like it would be hard to prove that anyone was looking at any particular child, much less looking at the aggressively. On the other hand, vaguely defined laws have had the opposite effect as well; causing many people to get arrested for no good reason.	/r/MensRights	08/08/08 02:38 PM
0	Vote up if you lurk here. I thought it would be interesting to see if I would get a 0 or maybe more like 20. It gives me a vague idea.	/r/MensRights	03/08/08 11:05 PM
2	Vote up if you lurk here. I sort of wonder how many people lurk in this subreddit.	/r/MensRights	03/08/08 04:51 AM
7	If we had all female rulers, we probably wouldn't be alive today! Misogyny is hardly a response to misandry. Wouldn't you rather there were no sexism at all?	/r/MensRights	28/07/08 08:04 PM
1	Minnie Driver has revealed that she has no plans to include her baby's father at any time during the birth. Does he want in?	/r/MensRights	28/07/08 07:37 PM
6	Feminists who deny that females can rape are rape enablers. Anyone who denies that women can rape are rape-enablers.	/r/MensRights	27/07/08 02:43 AM