TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

turnipmushroom Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by turnipmushroom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They already passed laws requiring this in certain kinds of public places.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 12:08 AM
8

Guns are bad so let's use men with guns to take away all the guns. That way all the guns are in the hands of our trustworthy government.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 06:51 PM
5

I've always wondered if feminists actually care about manspreading or if it's just a tool to oppress men.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:04 AM
2

I believe that seat was in response to rampant groping on Mexico City public transportation, not manspreading.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:02 AM
25

It's her body, her choice. No one who doesn't own a uterus should be mansplaining about this extremely late term abortion.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:00 AM
-1

I think you're making an emotional argument rather than a logical one. The primary goal here should be to free innocent men in prison for crimes that did not occur and to prevent future men from being sent to prison for crimes that did not occur. The question is should false accusers be given more lenient sentences when they come forward after a conviction? There is a valid argument to say yes because this will encourage more false accusers to come forward rather than staying silent and letting …
/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:36 PM
14

Train judges not to convict when there is reasonable doubt and hold them accountable when they don't. This man was convicted at a bench trial meaning a judge decided his innocence or guilt. The judge convicted based on the testimony of the girl alone with no other corroborating evidence. As far as I'm concerned the judge should be providing this man with a large sum in restitution as well. Then again this would probably have the same effect as punishing accusers that come forward as judges would…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:13 PM
8

Uh yes it definitely could have been enough. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68sfjt/extremely_harsh_sentence_for_false_accuser_just/dh0wt5p/
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:59 PM
9

I wonder what was going through the minds of the people standing around watching this man be murdered. I'm going something along the lines of: "Lol looks like someone is in the dog house. He's going to be sleeping on the couch tonight! I wonder what he did to deserve this...?"
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:10 PM
1

I find it very telling how your post in the UCSB subreddit had less responses in favor of this practice and saying "but what about the womenz??" than this one. Just goes to show how infested this place is with misandrist shills.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:04 PM
2

It was actually a bench trial so a judge convicted him, not a jury. I guess the judge doesn't believe in reasonable doubt?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:15 AM
11

I think the fact that you can get convicted in a case where there is no evidence other than her word vs his is extremely troubling. This situation sounds like the definition of reasonable doubt so I'm curious how in the hell this guy got convicted.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter