TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tuutikki Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by tuutikki on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I don't see any major difference between setting rates according to gender and according to profession. They're just looking for correlation. If people who become good nurses also drive better, it makes sense for the insurance people to take that into account.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 05:59 PM
1

Why can't we be equal and different? I think the issue with this is to do with within vs between gender variation. Yes, overall, women are different from men (some of it biological, some of it constructed), but so are people from different cultures, people of different size or sexual orientation. What I object to regarding accepting this "equal and different" approach is that it easily slips into defining people by their gender as opposed to their qualities (which may or may not correlate with t…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 04:30 PM
2

You are missing the gray area.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:25 AM
9

I hear this theory of "oh, the trolls are making MR look bad" a lot to justify some of the more extreme positions in this subreddit- what I don't understand is how you decide whether someone is a troll or not. Is antifeministmedia a troll? He certainly has some hate speech against women and probably makes this subreddit look bad because of it... but does that make him a troll? Probably not, since his posts are not downvoted too much. Converesly, if an "actual" troll posts something in line with …
/r/MensRights16/06/11 11:12 PM
22

He says in his letter he did it.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 10:49 PM
3

Do you really think women and feminism gives a shit about men? Yes. Its not like she's been told she's gay Erm- you really think that doesn't happen to women? And is this somehow relevant to being nice to people?
/r/MensRights15/06/11 10:50 PM
6

Slamming doors into anyone's face is not going to make the cause any dearer to anyone. And we really could use some more sympathy, or at least less hated and spite.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 05:13 PM
8

Or we could all just get over it and hold doors open to each other because it's common courtesy.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 03:07 PM
1

It's funny, I've never heard anyone actually seriously defend that position.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 07:52 AM
2

Well, if one of the parties didn't consent (drunk or not), presumably the other is a rapist- so you may be a rapist if both are drunk. It makes sense.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 10:13 PM
2

Well, yes, that is clearly silly.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 08:32 PM
1

To be honest, if you don't know whether there is consent or not, the right thing to do is definitely not "go ahead anyway, just in case there is." It's really not that hard to have sex with people who want sex, not people who might not mind it too much.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 09:16 AM
1

I think that for many traits the inherent in between class variation (men vs women) are smaller than inherent within class variation (different men). Most pronounced between class variations result from social constructs, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 11:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter