TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tvear Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by tvear on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I had to do a mandatory state sexual harrassment training recently for a new job and I was surprised to learn that it's actually considered acceptable to ask out a coworker! You just can't ask again if they decline, because then it becomes harrassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:02 PM
–

A lot of this is in her head though. I've never had a woman demand any kind of commitment before sex. If a woman is disappointed that it doesn't lead to a relationship it's not necessarily because of anything the guy actually promised or said, but assumptions she made up in her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:52 PM
0

I see it as just a saying like "boys will be boys" or something like that. It's a reminder that no matter how she presents herself to the world or what she tells you about herself, all of us are basically horny animals who are capable of bad behavior. "But I can't believe she cheated on me, she's a good christian girl!" "AWALT bro" It doesn't mean that literally all women in the world have cheated, it's just a reminder not to put her on some kind of pedestal. It's like if a staunchly religious h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:45 PM
1

I didn't say I agreed with everything or that it was "brilliant and great". Just that the sidebar is the standard for what it is. It's fine to question and debate things that are in there but a lot of the time people make strawman arguments against things that TRP doesn't actually say. "Age of Consent laws were created in order to raise the cost of sexual access by lowering supply. Artificially props up older women's sexual market value" I agree, this is creepy and cringe like much of TRP. "NEVE…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:33 PM
1

Sidebar. Not some weird youtuber, podcaster, black piller, or whatever strawman people here want to make it out to be, but the sidebar of the original subreddit. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 05:16 PM
4

It just occurred to me that there's sort of a flipside to the apex fallacy too. If the "just be yourself" advice is her thinking of the hot guy she was into who wouldn't commit, then the "just take a shower" advice is thinking of the absolute bottom of the barrel worst date she went on with the unshowered bad breath guy. It's the perfectly good well-groomed guy in the middle who she "just didn't feel a spark with" that she can't explain or give any advice for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 06:09 PM
3

Being social, talking to strangers, and enjoying meeting new people is just normal. If you've built up all of this intensely negative, cynical feelings about basic social interactions and you really believe that reality is evil and the world was created by a monster then maybe you're the psychopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:26 PM
2

As soon as possible, definitely don't try to become friends first. There's a third way that I've found to be most successful if you're not exactly the type to be able to meet a woman at a party or club and immediately go home with her that night. Be flirty but also friendly, and exchange socials. Then message her the next day, get some more flirty banter going and if she seems receptive then ask her out. It's a good blend of not being too pushy upfront, being able to take the time to get logisti…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:53 AM
–

CMV: I was just thinking that when people say "average" they're usually not talking about some exact middle point of a statistical distribution, they usually just mean "neither of the two extremes". So a tall man has an advantage, a short man has a disadvantage, but a guy who would neither be considered tall or short is just neutral. He's "average" even if his height is technically taller than the true statistical average in his area. Having a beautiful face is nice, having an ugly face is unfor…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 02:20 AM
–

A lot of times "average" isn't used to describe a person who is statistically average weight, and a 5 in looks, it's meant to describe just a regular dude who isn't too bad but not model tier. TRP has the concept of the AFC or average frustrated chump. He's not some kissless weirdo or guy who can't get laid. It's just a regular guy who has had girlfriends but has maybe been cheated on or branch swung from and he doesn't know what he's doing wrong. It's the guy who is good looking enough to get d…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 11:59 PM
2

Either way there isn't a standard that defines the entire RP community. Yeah there is, it's called the sidebar which clearly you haven't even read.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 07:52 PM
5

which almost certainly means he always had a good base and was just doing something wrong when he was younger This is the entire point of TRP ffs. The rest of your post is a strawman. TRP always was meant to be for regular average guys or "AFCs" who are just approaching things in the wrong way. It was never meant to be for extreme outliers who are non neurotypical, from other cultures, extremely ugly or disfigured, or anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 06:23 PM
–

Women have no problem with men working out, dressing better, and getting their shit together. They do have a problem with guys trying to improve their social skills, learn game, and things like that because they view it as gross and phony and manipulative. They want him to be a natural who just gets it, not a loser who had to google how to talk to women. But men talking about dating isn't just about self improvement it's also about educating other men about womens behavior and that's something t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 12:38 AM
2

local DJ does not have higher status than any doctor even in just SMV. Maybe while he's performing, with drunk chicken head 20yr olds. Yes he does, I'm talking about getting laid more with attractive woman. SMV. The DJ is more attractive, fun, and has better logistics and more opportunity than the doctor who is probably working all the time, wakes up early and is in bed by 10pm. When you consider 28+ women, with a career, doctor trades on better status. That's RMV. I think your mistake is you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 12:26 AM
2

Sure. Be the most popular guy in your social circle. Get noticed for accomplishing something interesting outside of work. Are your friends interesting? Is your life exciting? Do strangers know who you are and want to get to know you? That's status, not your job title and the size of your 401k.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 06:22 PM
2

No, none of that. Status is like fame on the macro level, or social standing within a particular social sphere on the smaller level. In a room full of doctors who is the highest status? It's the guy who everyone looks up to and all of his peers think he's a genius because he invented some innovative new surgery technique and won awards for it or whatever. He's higher status than an average pediatrician. A popular local club dj is higher status than any doctor in terms of SMV (not RMV). Women cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 06:21 PM
1

Dating is not logical. It’s not scientific. Trying to make it logical and scientific is actively self-destructing your dating life. Dating is emotional. Disagree. This is what women want to gaslight men into believing so they don't study, learn, and improve themselves. It's fine for women to have dating advice, books, forums, columns, rules, private networks to trade info about men, and anything else that gives them an upper hand, but they have to actively prevent men from doing the same so they…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 11:09 PM
4

Career doesn't matter. Status matters. There are objectively great careers with high incomes, lots of job security, and room for growth, that women wouldn't care about or be impressed by at all because they're boring, unsexy, and hard to understand. For the purposes of attracting women it's better to have a worse career that gives lots of social status than a great career that doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 11:01 PM
-1

The fact that it's something you can't change means it's arguably the least important factor to worry about. I know shorter guys who do just fine because they make up for it in other areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 10:21 PM
2

Nope, I'm above average in looks, income, and status. When I was younger I struggled because I was socially anxious and had no game. When I fixed that my dating life changed completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 08:10 PM
2

What's interesting is that if a man doesn't want to do some of these things, doesn't know how, or doesn't have time, he'll hire someone else to do it and pay for it. Yet women will complain about working and also doing housework but never think to just use the money she's earning at work to hire someone to do the chores she doesn't want to do. Women with house cleaners, nannys, etc are usually stay at home wives of rich guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 07:48 PM
0

That's always the response to male chores. "It's only a once a week thing" "Only a once a month thing" yet women will still complain about tasks that are only weekly like laundry, emptying the dishwasher, grocery shopping, or monthly like deep cleaning, or yearly like scheduling a doctor's appointment or buying christmas presents.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 07:40 PM
10

A third of married mothers in the US don't work at all. That's not exactly rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 07:38 PM
1

Children are expensive and women generally lose their ability to make money for some period of time due to pregnancy, giving birth and recovering. AKA she's actually planning on quitting working when she has kids so she can be a SAHM. Or maybe she'll do some easy part time work so she can still consider herself a "working mom" and get double the praise for being so "hardworking". When you live together, you have to match each other lifestyles and it's easier to do with similar incomes. If your p…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 07:35 PM
1

Someone did them dirty or they feel like they have been done dirty. That's the experience of most average men. You don't see men who have positive relationships with women getting into red pill. Positive experiences doesn't mean you aren't exposed to RP truths. I figured out what a branch swing was when it happened to me but I wasn't that into her so I thought it was kind of funny at the time and was relieved. I later had a woman branch swing from her longtime bf to me. Neither of those were neg…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 12:00 AM
1

64+27+9 = 100. That looks to me like 100% of women who would conceivably be open to casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 07:40 PM
1

Of course most people end up dating and marrying within their general socioeconomic bracket and with aligned personal interests. What you're talking about is mostly hobbies and interests which in your case happen to align with your career. Let's say a guy is into motorcycles and tattoos, he's probably going to date a woman who is also into those things, but all other things being equal, her actually be a career tattoo artist isn't that much of a bonus. He's not going to date the unattractive tat…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 06:54 PM
1

This is literally covered in TRP sidebar and talked about all of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 01:27 AM
1

Experience with women, reading about other mens experiences with women, listening to women talking shit about their exes, seeing women cheat on long time partners who don't have a clue about it, the things that women say about relationships on places like Reddit, having married women flirt with me. Where are you getting your info?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 12:24 AM
1

I'm above average. I've slept with women who were below average in moments of horniness and weakness. I guarantee that I'm not alone. Most women have had a chance to sleep with guys who were out of her league and it leads them to overrate themselves. Then when they settle into a relationship with a guy who is actually their equal, they resent him, treat him like shit, and make him jump through hoops. So yes, plenty of average guys are in relationships with average women but that's not seeing the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 08:18 PM
1

Keep the observations about sexual dynamics and behavior, lose some of the cringey language and the unnecessary right wing elements and racism. Still wouldn't be popular with women but it wouldn't have to be so immediately offputting.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 09:13 PM
–

Look below. "They're both ugly" "second guy looks like a sex predator"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 09:12 PM
2

Hilarious how women on here will claim that Statham is ugly as if we can't all google and see photos of his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 07:36 PM
1

Only desperate guys with no experience or options are going to go for a repeat if the sex was bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:41 AM
1

Men who leave women after sex just are not looking for a relationship. That's such bullshit. Newsflash, some women are terrible in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:43 AM
1

Right? Men are not supposed to have sexual compatibility? We're supposed to just stick around even if she says or does weird things in bed, smells bad, looks bad naked, or is just in general no fun to sleep with?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:42 AM
1

LOL you've never had bad sex? Or she looked terrible with her clothes off? I call BS on you actually being a dude if this is what you're claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:39 AM
3

No, I think it's true that most men have the ability to age better than most women for a variety of reasons. Mens' worst disadvantage is balding, but there are some men who are genetically lucky, many who respond well to drugs, transplants, and other treatments, and some who can get by with the shaved look. Youth isn't attractive on men so some guys who have a baby face well into their 20s will peak later when they start to look a little more masculine. Some guys still look good with a bit of ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 09:19 PM
1

I wasn't focusing on chores so much as a mother/father dynamic. Lots of women don't have a problem feeling like their partner is acting like a "daddy" to them or doing paternalistic things like providing, giving advice, or easy things like killing a spider. Any adult should be able to kill a spider so I thought of that example because it really mirrors a parent/child kind of dynamic but doesn't give men the "ick" feeling that women would get if a man acts like a child. Most women get plenty of e…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 12:19 AM
1

Huh? I don't really do anything for women that I don't have some kind of a relationship with. Not sure what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 12:14 AM
1

Disagree. You just have to understand which advice applies to you. TRP is very systematic and describes lots of different situations and outcomes so it applies broadly. BUT it was created by and for average to above average regular guys in the US. It wasn't meant to apply to austistic people for example. They should seek advice from somewhere that specializes in that. Most mainstream BP advice is aimed at women and from a women's point of view so it works for them, but it's not going to work for…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 09:27 PM
1

Emotional labor for one. Women will complain about it online "I'm not your therapist" but in reality love to dump all of their problems and drama onto their partner and most guys just accept it without complaint. Traditionally gendered household chores. "Ugh you left your underwear on the floor, I'm not your mother" but "ew kill this spider for me" "the toilet is clogged" "what should I do, I can't make a decision". Labor in general. Lots of women are perfectly happy to be with a man who earns a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 08:30 PM
0

Men who complain about unjust divorce laws are constantly told to pick better and told that they should care more about a woman's career and education. As if women don't intentionally check out and let their careers languish after she locks down the provider guy and has kids. As if women don't rack up a bunch of debt getting a degree and then only work for a decade until she finds a husband. As if women don't become lawyers and then leave in droves after having kids. Kind of hard to pick better …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 03:41 AM
1

-That men dont care about income. Sounds like you're focusing only on marriage and come from some kind of religious background where people date solely with the intention of marriage. I know lots of attractive young women and some are unemployed, live with parents, in debt, it doesn't matter, they still easily date, sleep around, and find boyfriends. -Huge income disparity couples. For there to be a huge income disparity one person has to have a relatively large income, so if you're hanging arou…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 08:07 PM
2

Very few women are in managerial positions to begin with In the US, 40% of people in management positions are women. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 04:41 PM
4

No, in a city of 6 million, 3% of the population is 180,000. It said something like 4 million for the entire country. Actually the whole LA metro area has about 18 million people so it's actually more like 550,000 women. This whole thing is such a hilarious self-own. Men: if you demand a 6 figure, over 6 foot guy with 6 inches, that's pretty rare, your standards might be unrealistic. Women: Oh yeah, well if you expect me not to be fat that's unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 06:57 PM
6

This seems broken or incredibly sad. I put 18-45 any race, any height, unmarried, must make $30k a year and it said that's only 7% of women!? 93% of women are fat or married or jobless? That doesn't seem right to me. But I made the criteria a little more strict and in line with my actual standards and got 3% which is about 200,000 women in my city so nbd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 06:27 PM
1

Believe what you want but status, excitement, and fun are way more important than looks. Looks are a threshold to meet. Once you meet that threshold, the fun party guy who always has something exciting going on is going to do a lot better with women than the boring serious guy who is too focused on the gym and his lame side hustle, even if the second guy technically "looks" better based on some gym bro's gay ass standards of male looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 03:10 AM
17

This is RP 101. TRP says that most average schmucks are overweight losers with no drive or ambition who do nothing but smoke weed, jerk off, and play videogames in their spare time. 5% is a huge exaggeration though and there are a lot more guys now who are getting in shape and grooming better so I think things are changing quickly. Obviously everyone has certain genetic advantages or disadvantages but beyond that most guys make very little effort. This advice misses what makes a guy fun, excitin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 08:13 PM
1

That's not true at all. It happens in relationships when she knows he's not going to commit but thinks he might be enough of a good guy to stick around and do the right thing. It's her way of forcing his hand and it's basically risk free for her. Get him used to unprotected sex while you're on the pill, then when the time is right stop taking it and get pregnant. Judge his reaction and if it seems like he'll go along with it and stick around, mission accomplished. If not just get an abortion. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 08:03 PM
1

Baby trapping isn't about casual sex or one night stands. It happens with girlfriends who are pushing for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 03:34 PM
1

But she gets two chances to avoid parenthood whereas men only get one. Two? She can abstain, get on the pill or other birth control methods, use a condom, use plan b, get an abortion, or give the child up for adoption. That's like 6 options. Guys have abstinence or condoms. Or vasectomies but then you'd have to include getting her tubes tied.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:56 AM
4

Humans have made and looked at images and representations of the human body and human sexuality probably since the very beginning of humanity. It's an entirely natural behavior and anyone attempting to regulate, censor, or pathologize it is a fucking idiot imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 04:05 AM
4

Ah yes those famous anglophones Truffaut and Bazin writing for the english language magazine "Cahiers Du Cinema".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 04:00 AM
15

Preselection isn't just about "taken" men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 01:45 AM
1

End legal marriage. It could still remain as a religious or symbolic ceremony but without any government involvement or legal implications. Everything else can stay the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 09:56 PM
3

Notice that nobody is really disputing the numbers but focusing on the conspiracy angle. You should clean this up and simplify it and repost something like "CMV: Only 15.6% of married women make more than their husbands."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 09:22 PM
1

That's the definition of beta bucks or golddigging. If she's so attractive why can't she find a successful guy who is as attractive as her? She has other qualities too. Apparently negative qualities that lower her "league". If you had to choose one, which would you agree with, "leagues don't exist, who you get is your league" or "most women are more attractive than their partners"?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 06:06 PM
1

At any given time, only a small percentage of women are willing to engage in casual sex let alone actively seeking it. Again, willing vs actively seeking are very different. The whole “willing to engage with the right guy is another myth” it makes men think that if they get rejected they just weren’t the “right guy” but that’s not what happened. Women just don’t want to have casual sex like that. You admitted yourself that "that’s not the same as saying that most women don’t ever engage in casua…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 07:10 AM
1

And yeah, I know most casual sex “just happens, that actually supports my position. No it doesn't because you keep talking about women "actively looking for" but that's not how it works. This is because most of the time women aren’t looking for or willing to engage in casual sex Looking for, no. Willing to engage with the right guy? Absolutely yes. therefore most men cannot do anything specifically to reliably obtain casual sex. There’s no cheat code or special way to act. Yes there is, rules 1 …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 05:36 AM
1

Being a 6 and dating down is sufficient. Especially with a little game and status. Going on one date and having sex isn't some accomplishment, it's normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 03:50 AM
1

I think you're misunderstanding the various camps. There are men who can't get laid at all and have never had a relationship. The incel and blackpill types. They're not looking for easy casual sex, they would be happy just to have a loving girlfriend. Then there are the TRP types. They've been misunderstood and distorted a lot around here but basically were "AFCs" or guys who have had girlfriends and relationships or were married and divorced. It's not that they can't get women but they've had b…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 03:44 AM
1

Income and possessions are not a very important part of status. It's your personal accomplishments which leads to social standing among strangers as well as friends, and then money and possessions may follow but aren't necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 05:15 AM
2

Current value. Not resources but social value. But current value is highly correlated to future value. It's pretty rare for a man to achieve a huge bump in status later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 05:13 AM
3

I think it's more for poor people with nothing to lose. More men with money are probably waking up to the fact that marriage is a raw deal for men. I guess extremely wealthy people also don't have much to lose since they're so wealthy. So maybe you're right.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 03:29 AM
2

I got around 2200/mo for 2 kids. How? 2 kids, she has them 100% of the time, he makes $8333 a month, she makes zero, calculator says he pays her $2675 a month. Add in 2000/child/month childcare at the bottom under "monthly child support add on information" and it says he owes her $4675 a month. IOW he has to pay for all of the childcare as well. Either he is paying her to be the kids nanny or he has to pay for their daycare/afterschool fees/etc so that she is able to work. No, he has to do both!…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 11:57 PM
6

LOL no it's just makeup. Calm down. Guys can grow beards to hide their weak chins and bad skin too. Did she look good enough for you to enjoy yourself during sex? If so then how can it be fraud? Sex is sex, not a promise that you're going to stay together forever and she's always going to look the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 10:55 PM
1

I assume you mean 2500 is alimony + child support? No, just child support. Spousal support is separate. I used the publicly available CA child support calculator here but feel free to choose your own location and run the numbers. https://childsupport.ca.gov/guideline-calculator/ You think 2500/month is enough to live on including full cost of 2 children? And 135k is gonna last you how long? Is the child support going to last forever? Why should a man be expected to pay 100% of his ex-wife's livi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 10:44 PM
1

The OP created a hypothetical scenario with a man who makes a well above average amount of money. It makes no sense to then compare that to any other average data. And now you're bringing other countries into the discussion? I at least picked a specific location and plugged the hypothetical numbers into the child support calculator. If you want to talk about your location feel free to contribute some actual numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 10:40 PM
1

If she's getting $2500 a month and $135k cash, she probably doesn't need to work. But if you want to include daycare you realize that's included in the child support calculations. He has to pay for that too! I put your crazy $2000/child/month figure into the calculator and now it says he owes her $4675/month in child support! In reality though that would only be if she's working so I have to give her some income. Fulltime minimum wage in CA is around 2686 a month, so if she made that much it say…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 09:03 PM
0

Averages are meaningless, the OP gave specific numbers: SAHM with no work history divorcing a guy making 100k and getting sole custody. I just plugged those numbers into the calculator. Also yeah "uncommonly good" meaning "above average" because the salary itself is above average. Duh. I personally know of arrangements where she was making WAY more than that a month because he made so much money. Also I don't know what you mean when you say you're not familiar with "timeframes". Child support is…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 08:19 PM
2

Why would you need daycare if you're a SAHM with two school-age kids???
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 08:18 PM
8

These kinds of posts always mention alimony and conveniently leave out child support, marital assets, and home equity. In CA, if you have 100% custody of two kids and he makes $100k and you have no work history he'll have to pay you about $2500 a month until they're 18. If he bought a median priced home in my area it would have increased in value at least $200k over the past 7 years so he'll have to sell the house and give you half. If he maxed out his IRA each year and made about 10% return, hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 03:03 AM
3

In my experience there are a few different categories. The vast majority of people are unattractive and their relative looks are basically irrelevant. Maybe a 4 is dating a 2 but who cares, it doesn't really matter, they're all ugly. There's a somewhat smaller group of couples who are attractive and evenly matched in looks. I would say less than 20% of couples. Then there is a small minority of men who can regularly date women more attractive than them and these are high status guys who are succ…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 09:09 PM
2

All of the women said to stay off the dating apps. They don't want you to see that they're still active on there and they're telling you you're not attractive enough to find success there. There seems to be more purpose and maturity. They're done having fun and have a checklist of qualifications you need to meet to be the proper provider they're looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 02:25 AM
1

No, this is terrible advice. If you can't meet women on your own then you've got problems that a "wingwoman" can't possibly help you with. If you're socially intelligent enough to be friends with a bunch of women but you can't get a date, then that's a sign that you don't have enough of a sexual energy about you and don't know how to flirt and escalate. A wingwoman can't help you there. The fact that you're platonic friends with women you're not dating is going to be a red flag that your female …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 02:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter