twentyThree59 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	What could possibly go wrong... (iPhone edit apologies for the dodgy framing) What would you have told the black people in 1870 Georgia that wanted freedom? Or the Jews in concentration camps? At what point do you think violence is acceptable?	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/08/20 06:29 PM
-2	What could possibly go wrong... (iPhone edit apologies for the dodgy framing) well now roughly 30 people are dead as a direct result to the riots Cops average just over 3 people per day, and that's been increasing over the course of years. But hey, lets ignore that? You have the right to PEACEFULLY assemble. And they tried this, cops shot tear gas, now here we are, with you forgetting the first part. I'm out in the middle of rural fuck all, but even I can see why shit is the way it is. If the cops won't change, things will continue to escalate every single year.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/08/20 12:31 AM
-7	What could possibly go wrong... (iPhone edit apologies for the dodgy framing) Did you really just read the words “these people” and perceive it as something racial in it? Nope. Btw, we ALL want cops to be held accountable. Everyone gets pissed when a cop gets away with something terrible. Cops seem to not want it, they are insisting people stop protesting (going so far as to illegal detain people, but hey, who's holding them accountable anyway?). And modern republican leaders are voting in a pattern that support the authoritarian patterns displayed by cops over the last 2…	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/08/20 10:36 PM
-12	What could possibly go wrong... (iPhone edit apologies for the dodgy framing) "these people" - no idea what they want... but the protestors want cops to be held accountable for their actions and a reduction in funds because they don't need military equipment. Your rant is just like someone on the left assuming all conservatives follow qanon.	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/08/20 08:42 PM
7	Judge Judy on child custody. Simple, Straight and Quick! There was a study done on gay couples and it found that they also split jobs like a traditional couple. Seems to just be the most efficient way to handle things. The stay at home person is absolutely contributing and important. And if you have kids, it's time consuming and full time.	/r/MensRights	10/06/18 04:38 PM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." I said they arrogantly believe they can predict the effects of their policies No, you said don't control outcomes, which is a black and white word. They either control, or they don't. This was a correct use of "false dichotomy." You presented a situation in which they do one of two things, do or do not control things. That wasn't a healthy framing of the situation. They do influence things though. you don’t have to hate one side just because you disagree. I don't. I just recognize they aren't eq…	/r/MensRights	05/02/18 12:22 AM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." The world is very complex and only politicians are arrogant enough to think they can control outcomes. Again with over simplification (again, false dichotomy). They don't control - they influence. Of course they don't have full control. No one is saying that. But you can't tell me that they have zero influence. Their laws do things and who is elected does change which laws get enacted. the truly catastrophic ideas have generally been bipartisan. Again, I'm in favor of voting reform to get third …	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 11:06 PM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." There’s a lot more to it than D or R. Not a lot else in power though. I assure you, I'm all for third parties and voting reform, I actually think its one of the most important things we could accomplish.... but its not like other groups have had control over government in quite some time. Government has always had relationships with other entities, but the people actually passing the bills are currently all D or R. No, I’m saying that trying to blame very complicated events and outcomes on polit…	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 10:26 PM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." So you truly believe the parties just happen to be perfectly equal in terms of shit they cause society? You aren't just ignoring the fact that one party is slightly more responsible, you are saying "no, they are perfectly equally responsible?"	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 09:34 PM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." So you're basically saying "its not black and white, thus it's 50% 50%" which is the "false dichotomy fallacy." Oops!	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 09:22 PM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." Don’t be a schmuck that looks for the (D) or (R) when voting. Look at policy, not party affiliation. I do, but I'm also not blind to the pattern that the better policy tends to have a (D) with it. no political party is more or less responsible for them. While there have been problems under both parties, we can measure objectively which one has done better and it is not a tie. Your statement is false. http://thereformedbroker.com/2016/12/13/every-unified-republican-government-ever-has-led-to-a-fi…	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 08:01 PM
-3	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." Well lets back up... perhaps I shouldn't have used the word "crimes." After all, you didn't. I picked that word. But really, I mean it in a less "legal" way and in a more ethical way. I do believe "ethical crimes" are a thing. Slavery was legal, but an ethical crime. So with that said... where do I fucking start with the republicans... taxes, public services, human rights, lies, sexism, racism, general bigotry, active partisanship (looking at kentucky's fillibuster of their own bill for that one…	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 06:22 PM
-3	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." Yea, my perspective includes several issues though, not just 1. That's a rather over simplified argument you are making.	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 06:13 PM
-1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." Also, democrats are guilty as well. ...of far lesser crimes? Sure. Of equal crimes? Not even close.	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 05:41 PM