TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

twersx Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by twersx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Uhhh that's really a silly reason to say hes importsnt to xbox today. In that case, we should put people who developed coding languages, alan turing etc. At the top since without them gaming would be nowhere Its a list of whose current and recent work is of importance to xbox gaming; cormacks rage was kind crap and thats all hes done for xbix (rage was multiplatform). I'm not going to get into sarkeesian's work because I cant be bothered discussing anything
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:31 AM
-4

The article is about important to xbox. While quake is one of the (if not the) most influential games ever made, id has only made rage for xbox which was pretty shit
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:26 AM
9

Carmack is one of the most important people in gaming and probably the most important person in first person shooters for his work on wolfenstein, doom and quake, the latter of which is probably the single most influential video games ever made
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:15 AM
1

I dont have a keyboard right now and what I actually want to say is pretty long, so I will reply to this later
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:17 AM
-1

So all conservst8ves believe the same things? All liberals, environmentalists, libertarians, christians, etc. all believe the exact samr things about every issue? Edit: you mentioned PUAs so I'm going to assume you are really stupid
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:13 AM
1

I think that in certsin situations, you might not "want" to go to the dentists or have sex with a partner, but you do want good teeth or a good relationship, which is why you do whatever it is you dont want to do
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:59 AM
1

What makes you think that feminism is some unified ideology which has fucking men over as one of its tenets? The majority of feminists ive talked to irl are very aware of and support the resolution of issues like the current state alimony/custody, the lack of focus on things like testicular cancer, male rape etc. Sure the radicals are stupid but just as the majority of mras are not TheRedPill esque radicals, most feminists are not srs esque radical
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:05 AM
2

No wanting and consenting are the same thing. Enjoying and consenting are different but consent is literally you wanting to have sex with someone, whether you think youll enjoy it or not.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:59 PM
1

ur handwriting is v strong
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:40 PM
0

you are objectively wrong about most of what you posted there, other than the two-way sexism wrt women being treated "like princesses" and receiving uncharacteristically good behaviour from most men without having to do anything (and also having absurd expectations of being reserved about nearly everything). this is only really true with rich/well off people, poor people (of which there are a lot) have different attitudes to women and it's in the poverty ridden areas where rapes are most common.…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 10:46 PM
-5

what? a country where gang rapes, and raping to death is so common that the vast majority of cases go unreported and those that are mostly do not result in convictions? India isn't some country where you can get away with calling anything rape then get compensation; it's a country where most don't care that you were raped.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:11 PM
1

they wanted to rid society of slavery. they didn't think "that guy doesn't deserve slaves" they thought "slavery is an abomination and a bad mark on our society that we would be better off without." however, society benefited from slaves; slaves did manual labor for no pay. it allowed farmers and the like to profit easily. my point is that while it may be out of a man's immediate interests to promote feminism, he may believe that it is the right thing to do. similarly, I believe that women are p…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:01 PM
1

i wasn't talking about the civil war. I was talking about the general movement to abolish slavery. Why did William Wilberforce campaign for abolition, when it brought no benefit to him?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:41 PM
0

why did white people fight for the abolition of slavery? By attempting to rid themselves of the right to own slaves, they were fighting against their best interests since it would bring them pretty much no gain to outlaw slavery
/r/MensRights14/05/13 03:39 PM
7

it's fucking irritating because complement means "work well together" or "have good chemistry" Which do they want?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:58 PM
1

late reply but game theory applies a little here. yes, if enough people vote 3rd party, 3rd parties will have success, and that is undoubtedly a good thing. however, if not enough people vote, it's a wasted vote. people don't like the idea of their vote's worth being based on how many others supported the 3rd party candidate
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter