TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tygertiger Archive

View 34 posts and 406 comments by tygertiger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1541

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:31 PM
157

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights29/06/15 11:07 PM
106

Edu./Occu.tygertiger/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:29 AM
106

False Accusationtygertiger/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:17 AM
99

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:41 AM
95

Discriminationtygertiger/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:02 PM
68

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:07 AM
63

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights04/08/15 11:47 PM
50

Discriminationtygertiger/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:27 AM
44

Edu./Occu.tygertiger/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:09 PM
44

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:09 AM
43

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:26 PM
40

Social Issuestygertiger/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:24 PM
34

Social Issuestygertiger/r/MensRights21/10/15 04:50 PM
29

Edu./Occu.tygertiger/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:43 AM
29

Edu./Occu.tygertiger/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:36 PM
28

Edu./Occu.tygertiger/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:49 AM
25

Legal Rightstygertiger/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:35 PM
18

Social Issuestygertiger/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:55 PM
16

Activism/Supporttygertiger/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:03 AM
15

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:21 PM
14

Generaltygertiger/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:30 AM
13

Intactivismtygertiger/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:47 PM
9

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:02 PM
9

tygertiger/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:34 PM
9

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:22 AM
5

Edu./Occu.tygertiger/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:29 PM
4

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:14 PM
4

Generaltygertiger/r/MensRights15/07/15 06:00 PM
3

Social Issuestygertiger/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:29 PM
2

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:31 AM
2

Feminismtygertiger/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:11 AM
1

Social Issuestygertiger/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:53 PM
0

Social Issuestygertiger/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And if she wants to claim her ancestors are from Africa, then can't he do the same since we're all supposedly descended from Africans?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:06 AM
4

As a black woman, she shouldn't be in university. That's cultural appropriation of an institution created by whites.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:04 AM
1

Kickstarter and produce it yourself. Make short films and post them to YouTube.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:54 PM
3

Can you please do a buddy cop movie with Gavin where Gavin mocks you for your fabulousness and you lob witty barbs at him all while the two of you take down an international Feminist cabal intent on taking over the world?
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:43 PM
4

The amount of feminist outrage would collapse in upon itself and Toronto would vanish into a singularity.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:40 PM
12

She's a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:01 AM
1

What's "right wingy"?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:51 AM
2

And?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:44 AM
1

OP - this is Gavin Macinnes. It's his show. He is well known in the alt-right sphere.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:44 AM
1

Why "grain of salt" for quoting Thatcher?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:42 AM
9

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Service_System
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:29 PM
2

At the end of the day I don't really give a shit about how he likes his dicks, which is what his position boils down to. He does a lot of good, he's on our side, and we should be concerned with building alliances and knowing who our allies are. Milo is an ally. Infighting and nitpicking is not what we should be doing right now.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:38 AM
29

He's anti-feminist, not an MRA.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:36 PM
1

This is why Feminism is a dangerous, authoritarian ideology and must be destroyed.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:42 PM
2

By the same logic, we should also address the amount of whites murdered by blacks, a disproportionate number in relation to the total percentage of blacks in the population. White lives matter less when killed by blacks.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 07:35 PM
-1

You might be right. However it is easily explained because women didn't have to worry about it when the men did. Women needed to be concerned with giving birth and making sure their children were fed. Much like any other issue concerning safety and protection, the onus falls to men.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 07:26 PM
2

No, it just means that we've got to start fighting back like we mean it.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:09 AM
1

No woman in your life will ever love you as much as your mother. Once you realize that, everything else sort of falls into place. Women don't care about the MRM or men as a class, except for a few exceptional exceptions of the female persuasion.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:07 AM
3

Attempted circumcision ban in San Francisco struck from ballot after lobbying by Jewish American groups in 2011. http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/u-s-judge-strikes-circumcision-ban-from-san-francisco-ballot-1.375923
/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:53 AM
2

Why do you keep ignoring what I'm saying? I'm not talking about why the practice was adopted in Europe and America. I am talking about why attempted bans in Europe and America have failed in the last decade. It is due to lobbying from Jewish groups. And, yes, my claim does hold up to trivial investigation. That is if you bothered to actually do any. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/new-circumcision-ruling-requires-doctors-to-discuss-procedure-a-924984.html
/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:50 AM
1

You need to re-read what I wrote. The reason circumcision bans aren't passing today is due to the influence of the Jewish lobby along with the fear of a government in power being labelled anti-Semitic.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:46 PM
-1

The only reason circumcision is still a thing is the influence of Jews as a political body, and the fear of Western governments being accused of "anti-semitism". There have been attempts to have it banned, but they have always been defeated by the Jewish lobby.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:40 PM
1

Thank you for posting! Watched 2 already and will be watching the rest.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 03:29 AM
3

The opposite would never occur because men would never react in such a way towards a woman. Think of screaming girls at a Boy Band concert. You will never see teen boys screaming for a Girl Band. It's a female thing. Doesn't make it any less ridiculous, though.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:37 AM
3

OP - Have you read the comments on the NP Facebook post? Ugh.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:24 PM
1

Fight these bastards!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:07 PM
1

What does a sexual consent course have to do with an engineering degree?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:05 PM
1

You're an idiot. Unlike Click, Eich didn't touch anyone without their consent (that's battery under the law) or threaten to sic "muscle" onto to someone who was legally on public property. What she did is threaten a student journalist with violence. That's a crime. Not only should she be fired, she should also face criminal charges. She didn't just "say" stupid shit - she did illegal things.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:56 PM
2

The claims of rape and death threats have already been made.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:48 AM
1

Okay - then we keep the pressure on to have her step down or be fired from that position, too.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:53 AM
1

She just resigned!!! http://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/higher_education/update-mu-faculty-member-resigns-courtesy-appointment-apologizes-for-photojournalist/article_6e2cedaa-87c7-11e5-ae63-87e5cacea580.html
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:48 AM
4

She's resigned!!! http://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/higher_education/update-mu-faculty-member-resigns-courtesy-appointment-apologizes-for-photojournalist/article_6e2cedaa-87c7-11e5-ae63-87e5cacea580.html
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:47 AM
1

No! Instead use it as fuel to fight.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:54 PM
18

Barf. No wonder universities are in the state they're in.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:53 PM
2

The truth will set you free, bro. You have real courage.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:03 AM
6

She got decimated. Comments rape!
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:54 AM
1

He recently criticized GameGate, too.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:06 AM
2

Agreed that it should be legal for a private business. Agreed that since it isn't, it is unjust that it is only enforced against males.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:42 AM
3

Yes *edit: and is this a lesbian coffee shop? And are only gays qualified to work at gay bars?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:40 AM
10

Canada? If so - the land where it's okay to discriminate against white, hetero males when hiring because reasons. Even your government does it! Ladies first!
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:17 AM
1

Even "50 Shades" riffs on this, where the monster becomes a sociopathic sexual sadist.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 08:39 AM
2

Women are attracted to monsters. King Kong, Dracula, Werewolves...there is always an element of sexual ravishment at play. I remember as a kid, both my mother and sister remarking on how much they liked the Beast in the Disney cartoon, but hated when he turned into the beta pretty-boy Prince. Beasts and monsters are fantasy alphas. They either want to fuck you or kill you, sometimes both. Gina tingles result.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 05:16 AM
1

I'll rub my foreskin on their faces.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:46 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:45 PM
135

Ban it NOW
/r/MensRights26/10/15 03:34 AM
4

Actually, the evidence shows that the gas pedal was on the floor and her explanation that her foot was "stuck under the pedals" was rejected by the court. Read the article.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:56 PM
5

You keep referring to the incident as an "accident" that couldn't have been prevented. Did you read the article? The evidence indicates the gas pedal was on the floor. Her explanation that her foot was "stuck" under the pedals was rejected by the court. She lied.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:55 PM
3

Send her to prison, like they would for a man. Her ineptitude resulted in the deaths of two children. She should be punished with incarceration.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 07:26 PM
1

Great. So when is the class for ladies telling them not to dress like sluts that they can't opt out of?
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:31 PM
-13

Abortion is murder and these feminist protesters are animals.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:56 AM
4

Of course it is! You have no obligation to have sex with someone and your concern for your own health and welfare is paramount to not hurting someone's feelz.
/r/altTRP15/10/15 10:23 PM
15

Drafted into non-combat roles. FT
/r/MensRights15/10/15 10:18 PM
2

Well that explains it.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:18 PM
2

I suppose you've never heard of affirmative action or equity hiring.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:42 PM
0

War. Revolution. Rebuild.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 04:57 PM
1

What are you on about? Of course men will allow this to happen. They already have.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 04:56 PM
10

Please dump her immediately and get out of that situation before you end up wrongfully charged with assault.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:13 AM
1

Putin? You mean the guy who is dedicated to defending his people and their cultural heritage from invading Muslim hordes? Who's doing the job that NATO won't in Syria? Who opposes western ideologies like politicized feminism? Who is consistently denigrated by a propagandizd Western media? Him?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:52 PM
2

What's so bad about that?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:41 PM
1

Or move to Eastern Europe or Russia and find a feminine girl to wife up. Western women are lost.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:06 PM
4

I don't necessarily advocate for the fall of the West. I'm just perceptive enough to realize it's already happened, and we are witnessing its slow decline into oblivion. I'm not so certain that's such a bad thing anymore, given how decadent the West has become. Of course another civilization will take its place (if we are prepared), but like the Europe that rose after the Fall of Rome, it could take hundreds if not thousands of years, preceded by a Dark Age. And what's to say the civilization th…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:04 PM
2

Tell that to the survivors of the fall of Rome.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:34 AM
2

Including our civilization.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:00 AM
1

Plus in the last one, Bond subtly suggested to the villain that he (Bond) is bisexual.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 04:42 AM
2

Part of Red Pill is recognizing that the situation is already past saving.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 04:27 AM
1

Red Pill, you fools.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:46 AM
2

I noticed that Streep defines herself as a humanist. I may be mistaken, but that seems like backtracking from her previously identifying as a feminist. I take this as a good sign: perhaps she senses a shift in the wind?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:32 AM
4

Like the old man she accused of being violent towards her?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:54 PM
2

The UN can't do shit.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:57 PM
2

"We didn't pull the fire alarms" LIARS. Faces are covered. COWARDS.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 10:42 PM
8

Here's her response on Facebook to a comment from a woman who related her own story of regret for not stepping in to stop violence because she was afraid: Thanks (redacted). I get why you feel that regret but it's completely understandable why you didn't intervene there, when you have little reason to believe you could end that violence, and when you have good reasons for believing that they would turn on you too. Just because it might be admirable to intervene in a certain situation doesn't mea…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 11:37 PM
3

I guess she missed the irony that she and the crazy guy both agree that men are needed to protect women from other men.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 11:01 PM
5

OP - contact CAFE. They're based in Toronto and they might be able to offer you access to free legal counsel or advice. They also have some money behind them. Your cause goes hand in hand with the banning of men's issues groups on campus at Toronto universities.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:12 AM
1

Probably a false-flag. Regardless, I can see the faculty for the Gender Studies dept having a meeting where, despite the police confirming there is no threat, they decided to go ahead with cancelling classes. It's convenient to their narrative because it "proves" the "need" for their program (and their paycheques).
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:12 PM
1

Because most people are uninformed, stupid, and easily influenced. It's also very politically convenient to those in power to keep the lie going.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 09:25 PM
1

*this happened in Montreal, not Toronto.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 08:28 PM
0

It is clearly satire. You're wrong. Only stupid people don't understand it, or do understand it and are purposefully taking it out of context to further their agenda. To your other point: writers shouldn't be restricted from writing satirically because some people speak the native tongue as their second language. That's their problem, not the writer's.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:10 PM
22

I love when truths like this are stated so simply.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:50 AM
0

Satire, meet this guy.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:47 AM
0

If it's taken 'as serious', that's the fault of the reader, not of Roosh. It is clearly satire.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:47 AM
0

I stand with Roosh.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:44 AM
2

Can Janice be 'Based Prof'? Somebody's got to get her in touch with CHS and Milo and do a roundtable at the University of Toronto. I think the outrage generated from the Fem Brigade would cause the city of Toronto to collapse in on itself into a singularity. I can't wait to watch this series!
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:39 AM
0

They're gonna hate you no matter where you get the story from, bud. Get a clue.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:45 PM
0

Seriously. No, I couldn't find any other publication that reported on it, at least at the time I posted it yesterday. Seriously.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:44 PM
2

Ha!
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:28 AM
6

There is a large contingent of gay men in the MRM.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:22 AM
4

I support Roosh's right to free expression in Canada.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:17 AM
0

I don't.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:05 AM
0

What are the 'extreme' opinions expressed? For the record, I find your disclaimer 'distasteful'. *edit: why didn't you just post "TRIGGER WARNING"?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:56 AM
0

What's your PhD?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:52 AM
0

On point. Completely agreed. There is a lot of groupthink on this sub.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:12 PM
0

I don't know about that. There's quite a bit of groupthink on here that tends to lean Left. Try discussing Red Pill in a positive light.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:11 PM
2

Has anyone ever articulated what exactly progressives are "progressing" towards?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:09 PM
1

It s a really well-written piece. Well done. Do you have a blog?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:08 PM
3

I agree with you. The problem is "progressivism", one facet of which is feminism. Did you write this?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:17 PM
1

Neo-Nazi activity is growing in Europe. http://europe.newsweek.com/neo-nazi-activity-rise-europe-316465
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:21 AM
1

It's a pretty close race!
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:36 PM
2

Remember the old adage that any publicity is good publicity? Of course this will be a hatchet job by the BBC and will paint the MRM as baby-eating shit lords (with maybe a point or two in favour, they'll mention father's rights briefly, because they'll want to be "balanced"). Regardless, it shows that the MRM is gaining traction in the larger culture. This is a good thing. Curious, intelligent men (and women) who would otherwise not know about this movement will have their interest piqued and wi…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:36 PM
1

Sex bots
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:32 PM
2

Where's the one with the lesbian couple?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 05:23 AM
1

As stated in the title, I caught an interview with him on the CBC. The article linked to does not have the video of the interview. If it goes up online, I'll link to it.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 05:07 AM
7

It's the audacity of his statement that gets me, that women should be the default gender that should be catered to, no questions asked. I actually have no problem with finding a happy medium. If men are more comfortable at 22 degrees Celsius and women at 25, then set the thermostat to 23.5 and the uncomfortable people at either extreme can adapt, male or female. The interviewer didn't question Hedge when he made this statement. Why should women be catered to and men forced to adapt?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:37 AM
1

What in the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:04 AM
2

Badge of honour.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:39 PM
2

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/26/half-of-unmarried-lgbt-americans-say-they-would-like-to-wed/ Only 52% of unmarried LGBT polled (in 2013) responded that they would like to marry at some point. 56% of unmarried gay men.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:37 PM
-1

maybe you meant to say... No. I said what I meant and meant what I said. The vast majority of gay men never have had and still don't have any interest in getting married.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:07 PM
0

Nope. Marriage is now essentially a trap for gay men as much as it is for straight men. Most gay men don't want to get married as it is. Now there will be a societal expectation that they do. the only winners in modern marriage are divorce lawyers and the state.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 04:57 PM
1

I know you were. I just wanted to underscore what their modus operandi is.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:04 PM
8

Their prerogative is to force their agenda onto everyone else, not to have to endure it themselves.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:36 PM
3

Don't feed the troll (brigader). *edit: article linked to is Slate. Written by Amanda Marcotte. That tells you everything you need to know.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:50 AM
1

Because it's a lie.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:33 AM
3

I'm more intrigued to read it now.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 09:50 PM
25

This might go some ways to explaining the poor reviews it's receiving. Publishing is now a female dominated industry.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 03:19 PM
0

"You're a misogynist" or "you're sexist" or "you hate women" or "you're a chauvinist"
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:20 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:43 PM
3

It's going to take time, but public sentiment surrounding this issue is shifting. Even five years ago, anti-circ was hardly a blip on the radar. Now places like San Francisco and even the entire country of Germany have tried to enact bans.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 01:46 PM
1

Apparently she does have a boyfriend. I can imagine the pegging must be painful.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 12:25 AM
1

If you have time to PM me, I'd be interested to hear your story.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 12:17 AM
1

She refers to herself on Twitter as a "Turtle Island Settler". "Turtle Island" being the aboriginal name for North America adopted by the SJW brigade as a sort of white-guilt Mark of Cain to show how "inclusive" they are. She is a lynchpin of the feminist Stasi in Toronto, which is itself the black, flaming bunghole of feminist ideology made manifest in the Western world. She and her sister harridans planned to take this fellow down, according to testimony. When feminism finally faces the music …
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 12:14 AM
3

A huge part of Feminism is to actively ignore biology.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:27 PM
8

Free Speech doesn't exist in Canada like it does in the USA. There is no First Amendment in Canada. Free expression is enshrined in Canadian law, but it doesn't cover "hate crimes", "hate language" etc.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:09 AM
1

Then report it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:57 PM
1

Listen and believe /s
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:51 PM
8

Guthrie is an odious radfem agitator in Toronto. You can google her to see her looooong history of anti-male activism. But then she's not alone - Toronto is the devil's asshole of radical feminist activity in the Western world.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:50 PM
2

Given that it is Canada, I'm 50/50 on whether or not he will be found guilty. That's how much Canada already is lost.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:43 PM
1

Do you believe in the state?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:47 PM
1

Well that's exactly what I'm doing. You're pretty quick. So why is it okay for you to prevent people from entering your home but not okay for a government to prevent people from entering a country?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:06 PM
1

So you believe you have the right to defend your home from people trying to enter it against your wishes?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:55 PM
1

How far does your anarchism go? Do you believe in personal property rights?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:09 PM
1

So you're completely ignoring the whole illegal immigrants aspect to his argument, I see. There's nothing that America can do about crime committed by its legal citizens, apart from applying its laws against them. America can, however, prevent non-Americans from entering the country illegally and committing crimes, which is exactly what Trump is referring to when he cites crimes committed by Mexicans illegally entering the USA.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:27 AM
13

Looks like she was rolling her eyes to me. A lot of actors are "feminists" in public but something else in private.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:05 AM
4

They know the evidence that disproves it. They don't care. All they care about is votes and money, and perpetuating this myth gets them both.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:11 AM
20

Here's a link to the full panel - high quality and camera on the cast the whole time. The femtards question comes in at 33:10. Watch Natalie Dormer's reaction to the word "patriarchy" at 33:52. Gold. http://youtu.be/TFuJnOhlk7c
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:05 AM
2

I'm not looking to him for inspiration. I just want to understand why you called him a bigot for pointing out factual, statistical data on the crime rates of illegal Mexican immigrants (he "rants" about illegals, not legal immigrants). My understanding was that MRAs value logic and facts over feelz.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:31 PM
1

Right - I forgot that's what makes someone a "bigot" these days.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:27 PM
1

Why is he a bigot?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:20 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:11 PM
10

But only if they're female.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:37 PM
6

*and the mentally retarded FTFY
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:34 PM
9

If two lesbians get drunk and scissor it out, they are both rape victims and the closest male in the vicinity is a rapist.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:31 PM
5

Didn't some guy get charged with sexual assault after he woke up to a woman giving him a blowjob?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:07 PM
3

How about two lesbians?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:07 PM
1

Wrong sub dude.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:00 AM
0

She should've been executed.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:51 AM
1

Gawker's still around?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 09:38 PM
15

Have you seen footage of dudes who came back "shell shocked"? It's extremely disturbing. They had no idea what to do with them so they just locked them up in asylums.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:57 PM
6

Why would you fight to defend a government /country that openly devalues you because you are a man? The UK has some of the most anti-male legislation in the Western world.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:54 PM
12

That's awesome. What was her reaction to the exodus, if any?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:49 PM
3

Liberal media.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:48 PM
22

If there is a heirarchy of shittines in war, then being killed definitely trumps feeling horrible about your loved ones being killed but being alive. That's not to say that those feelings aren't difficult to deal with and suck, but at least there is hope for healing, something dead men certainly don't get. Clinton clearly doesn't agree, given the gendered lens through which she views both war and the sexes. A view that encompasses only women as victims. Having said that: kindly don't tell me wha…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:42 PM
69

All those feelz! Worse than death! /s
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:59 PM
14

I get the sense that feminism is moving towards making rape a more heinous crime than murder.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:58 PM
1

Feel free to retain your prerogative to be a punching bag while others retain their right to self-defence.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:55 PM
1

While there currently aren't a lot, the majority of comments on the article itself support the manager and his right to defend himself. That's a good sign.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:54 PM
3

Puffpo. What else do you expect?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:56 AM
3

You should put this in quotes as it currently looks like you saying this.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:47 PM
3

This is bullshit. I'm gay and I think this "superior" nonsense is ridiculous. Gay men are human beings like all other human beings, having their own individual foibles and flaws. I could easily make the argument that straight men are superior because they are programmed to pass on their genetic heritage through procreating. This is "us and them" thinking that is a hallmark of the "progressive" movement and creates divisions between different groups of humanity. Really, really dumb. Treat people …
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:41 PM
10

Facebook is feminist central (along with Tumblr and Twitter). Seriously - do not spend time on there. Use it if you must as a means to keep in touch with friends and family or as a marketing tool if you own a business, etc. It is a massive time sink and is lousy with SJW bullshit. Do not waste time there.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:15 PM
2

Family gatherings will be fun.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:44 PM
1

Justin Trudeau, the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, recently made it official that the LPC will not accept any candidates who are openly opposed to abortion.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:41 PM
0

The vast majority of people who use recreational drugs do so in moderation and responsibly. Despite the propaganda of The War on Drugs (TM), most people do not run the risk of becoming addicts and are able to easily control occasional recreational usage.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 06:14 PM
3

I understand the argument for herd immunity. How does that explain why other provinces in Canada are immunizing boys? Obviously those provincial governments do see a need and benefit for it. Additionally, yes - gay and bi men are completely disregarded in this scenario.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 11:26 PM
12

She appears to be a very unhappy and miserable human being.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:28 AM
6

Is that right? First time I've heard of her.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:27 AM
11

What happened? Gavin McInnes got fired from the company he founded and it went to shit. That's what happened.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 11:02 PM
3

Nope. That would be very stupid. Pepper spraying people who aren't attacking you physically is assault and would land you in jail. It would also reflect very poorly on MRAs. We have to be smart and strategic, not careless and reactionary. *edit: just checked - the Criminal Code of Canada prohibits Canadian citizens from using pepper spray as it is considered a weapon. It is illegal.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:27 AM
4

Pepper spraying them would be assault. Unless they are physically threatening or attacking someone. The attendees did the right thing by calling the police. However, next time they shouldn't warn them that the police are coming because it gives them a chance to slink off before the authorities arrive.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:08 PM
1

I guess you mistook the part where I said it will get a lot worse before it gets better for "triumphalism".
/r/MensRights27/06/15 04:44 AM
9

You don't even have to "turn gay". Just marry a platonic buddy and collect the benefits.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:47 PM
1

how would you know? History.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:45 PM
8

So you're blaming the MRM - which has zero institutional control - for how the feminist controlled media choose to erroneously depict and vilify us?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:31 PM
6

Don't bother. Instead, focus your time and energy on speaking with people who are sympathetic, open-minded, and value facts and logic.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:27 PM
6

I agree on both counts. They are doubling down (the 'onslaught') because they feel their power slipping. This always happens before collapse. It will get (a lot) worse before it gets better, but the fact that there is such a belligerent feminist push in all aspects of society paradoxically reveals that cracks are showing in their firmament.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:11 PM
6

By the way you present yourself, you come across as not entirely sympathetic to the MRM. I disagree with you that the majority of people have a negative impression of the MRM. I think the media paints that narrative, but when you actually talk to people, you find the opposite, unless they are dyed-in-the-wool 'progressives' or SJWs. In fact, I find that in general, most people have a negative impression of Feminism, which is reflected in the very small percentage of people who identify as such (…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:04 PM
8

The reason most people dislike the MRM "Most people" don't dislike the MRM - you just think they do because you're stuck in a feminist echo chamber.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:51 PM
5

Attacking feminism is a justifiable strategy when it is feminists who control the dialogue, politics, legislation, and media that negatively affect gender relations and impact the welfare of men and boys.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:45 PM
27

Remember that when you argue online, your goal is not to sway the opinions of those you are arguing with. Most feminists will never concede a point or change their opinion. What you are doing is arguing in order to sway the opinions of the silent majority who either don't know what is really going on or haven't decided what side of the fence they fall on. Always keep this in mind and comport yourself better than feminists and always argue rationally, with logic and facts.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:42 PM
6

No one is going to help you until you decide to help yourself. If you keep going back into a dangerous situation then you have to take responsibility for your role in placing yourself in danger.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:47 PM
1

If they were sued, they would have to prove that Subsection (1) applies to this scenario, would they not? The subsection itself does not protect them from facing litigation or a hearing before the CHRT, does it?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:39 PM
2

You just hit it out of the park. A+ Clearly less women want to be directors, leading to less female directors. It's not like Canada of all places is just refusing to hire qualified women. Absolutely. Women are over represented in other aspects of the film industry, like make up and wardrobe. No one is agitating to get more dudes into those positions. And as far as film as an industry goes, most women choose to pursue acting over film work. No one in Canada is preventing women from pursuing direc…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:35 PM
3

Have you told family members and friends? You need to. You need witnesses who know the situation and can vouch for you. You need to get out, man. Now. She is never going to change and you are putting yourself in a dangerous situation. You have nothing holding you there; no kids, no marriage...property and leases can all be dealt with. Go! Get out and live your life free from this harridan! You don't deserve this. Stay with your family or crash on a buddies couch for a bit. Door slam her - cut of…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:26 PM
4

Great guy and a great story about overcoming adversity. In Toronto (where the poster for his first play, Wolf Boy, still hangs at the Passe Muraille Theatre) the story goes that at age 18 he bought a junk car and drove all the way to Hollywood and never looked back. I find it mildly annoying that he gave up his seat to what appears to be a perfectly-abled young woman at the end of the video. Bit of the old chivalry going on there.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:18 PM
1

Basically this entire scheme seems dodgy at best, and illegal at worst. I can definitely see this coming back to bite them in the ass.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:25 AM
2

I would think so. And really - is this how women directors want to get hired? Not because they might be the best "man" for the job, but because the production is getting her at a major discount? And why are so many feminists on Twitter lauding this when it's just playing into what they say they abhor; their narrative that society treats women like commodities that can be bought and that can't compete with men on an even playing field?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:22 AM
1

Ah ok. Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:18 AM
1

replace woman with real director LOL. I wonder though - the studio might have a clause in the contract that requires a woman director to maintain the discount.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:17 AM
1

Is that from the Charter?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:12 AM
1

What would a non-protected reason be, as an example?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:11 AM
1

It looks like the municipality and the province are involved in funding this studio as well (maybe even the fed govt). Any production utilizing the studio is getting tax breaks. Again, I'm not clear on the law, but if various levels of govt are involved in funding this facility and the studio is discriminating against men, wouldn't that make this scenario even more egregious?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:10 AM
1

Yes, it seems like it would be in violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. If productions are being denied the same credit because they have a male director instead of a female one, is that not breaking the law?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:11 AM
7

From the article: TriBros also announced plans to put an end to gender inequality in North American film and television production by launching an incentive program to encourage the hiring of women in leading creative positions. Mr. Apostolopoulos announced TriBro will cut studio fees in half for any female-helmed productions at its existing studio in Toronto, and at its future studio in Pickering. He noted only seven per cent of the largest 250 feature films of 2014 were directed by women. Pick…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:38 PM
5

Right - which is why saying her sign referred to the "USA" is inaccurate. Her sign said "The West", referring to Western Civilization. It did not say "the USA" because she recognizes that there is no rape culture in Western Civilization, which includes the USA as well as Canada, where the slut-walk was held (Vancouver).
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:29 PM
7

Technically she didn't say "no rape culture in the USA", she said "in the West". The slut walk was held in Vancouver, BC, Canada.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:04 PM
4

Will they be addressing the white feather campaign?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:25 AM
2

It would be great if you started a new post that details your model for meetups that we can all use as an example.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:17 AM
6

"War's the only language men listen to!" Starring uber-feminist Meryl Streep. Yeah, I'm sure this is going to be really even-handed and not demonize men at all. /s
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:10 PM
19

Maybe women are rejecting feminism because they see Lena Dunham promoting it.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 05:35 AM
3

Toronto PRIDE is a feminist organization. It is beholden to a feminist agenda. They said as much in their statement when they stated CAFE would compromise the "participation of queer, lesbian and trans WOMEN in the Pride Parade,” by creating an "unsafe space". Of course not all the participants are Feminists, but they're not the ones deciding who's marching and who isn't. And I'll tell you something else: most of the gay guys participating in PRIDE either don't give two fucks about the MRM or th…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:47 AM
1

Dude - what part of "PRIDE" and "political LGBT" is Feminist are you missing from my post?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 10:58 PM
2

PRIDE is Feminist, as is all political LGBT.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 07:04 PM
3

This. This is what we need to start doing. Small groups of men coming together in meatspace. Growing a network. Sharing information and resources. Forming alliances. Look to GamerGate.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:42 PM
2

Agreed. That is what we should be discussing. There's only so much posting of links that we can do. At what point are we going to start DOING?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:39 PM
3

So i'll ask you, if I have 30 mins to spend writing a letter on behalf of the MRA, who should I write to? Maybe a newspaper or your MP (I'm assuming you're Canadian). Writing to an otherwise neutral publication with a large number of readers who either don't know what is going on or who are on the fence as to who to support in relation to this issue. It's those people we should be reaching out to. Not the totalitarians at PRIDE.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:40 PM
1

I'm a gay man and there is no fucking way I'm wasting my time and energy trying to change PRIDE or political LGBT, especially through something as futile as writing a letter to them. This battle is lost.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:59 PM
0

We do want to do something, but what we do has to be effective. A letter writing campaign from MRAs directed to PRIDE is futile.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:51 PM
5

Feminism uses gay men as a tool. It will discard gay men as soon as their usefulness is no longer required.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:47 PM
1

The letter you're writing to PRIDE in the hopes of achieving what exactly?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:46 PM
2

Yes. Withdraw co- operation and support. Openly denounce their practices.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 07:12 AM
9

Telling as many people as will listen that Feminism is a dangerous lie. Avoiding PRIDE like the plague. PRIDE IS FEMINISM. It is run by feminists. Participate in it? Fuck them. Withdraw co-operation and support. Why are you asking them for breadcrumbs? They HATE you. You are their ENEMY. They are laughing at your letters. Wake up.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 07:05 AM
-7

Define misogyny as it relates to TRP.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:56 AM
4

I'm sick of whining and complaining about feminists. Ask these people why we should support them if they don't support us: [email protected] What you propose is whining and complaining to feminists.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:16 AM
2

Would you pet the rabid dog in the hopes that it won't rip you to pieces?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:06 AM
3

I absolutely agree with you. A lot of MRAs want to ignore that fact and throw their brothers in the TRP under the bus.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:36 AM
6

Denounce PRIDE and their discrimination openly and publicly with peers, family members, whoever you can. Call them bigots. Call their event discriminatory. Fuck PRIDE.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:34 AM
4

You are not going to change the system by writing letters to the organization who unequivocally banned CAFE from their event in perpetuity.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:33 AM
1

It's too late for that.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:00 AM
2

It doesn't matter if you think we shouldn't associate TRP with the MRM. To everyone else outside of the MRM, they are all part of the manosphere. Ignoring this doesn't do us any favours.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 01:44 AM
11

Writing letters is pointless. The ENTIRE system is set against the MRM. This is lost. Want to know how to win? Stop. Playing. The. Game. When (white) men in droves wake up and realize that they've been had, and then decide to say "fuck this paradigm", then things will change. Political LGBT is NOT YOUR FRIEND (I'm a gay man). They even changed it from GLBT to LGBT to put lesbians first. They will laugh at your letters. They already decided a long time ago that the MRM was the enemy.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:57 AM
0

Start prepping for the collapse.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 03:43 PM
1

I imagine abortion rates will also drop significantly.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:53 PM
15

Exactly - this just proves how the people writing these inane articles know nothing about the way men actually think.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:41 PM
1

This is a marketing ploy and if it makes masculinity fragile, then sports jerseys in pink does the same for femininity.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:40 PM
2

I am considering not voting in the next federal election. I really don't give a shit anymore - all of the parties are beholden to the feminist agenda, yet in the event of a war or some catastrophe, you know who the government and society would turn to.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:39 AM
1

Agreed. Where are you?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:35 AM
14

This is good. Hit pieces mean that they are scared. They see a threat that needs to be neutralized (neutered?). It means that the MRM has power and its influence is growing.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:58 PM
2

Why are UK universities blocking men's societies? It also seems to happen in the USA, Canada and Australia. Because they are afraid.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:45 PM
2

Or...Caitlyn Jenner...
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:26 PM
1

And he's from a small town in Canada. He didn't even have the benefit of being American.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 06:59 PM
3

He's from an older generation, one that placed a higher value on marriage. I'm sure that factors into his serial marriage/divorce pattern.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 06:55 PM
3

She also has serious mental health issues and is bi-polar. Interesting how she doesn't factor her personal issues into the failure of their marriage. It's just all about him not doing right by her.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 06:54 PM
1

Polar bears have been around for over 100,000 years and have already survived a warming climate (after the last ice age).
/r/MensRights15/06/15 06:46 PM
6

$500+ million biggest weekend opening in history They said we were whining for critiquing Mad Max. Fair turnaround. Suck it, feminists.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 06:39 PM
1

It looks like the classical idea of a university is on its way out, what with new modes of open learning on the internet.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:24 PM
1

At the time Beyonce performed for Gaddafi, it was well-established fact, not rumours, that he was a brutal despot.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:19 PM
5

Will they be discussing how she took money from Muammar Gaddafi in exchange for a private concert?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:09 PM
1

None of this is controversial, feminists will agree with me - they say that we must take the "toxic masculinity" out of males by breaking up their ability to bond and spending most of their time with females present This is also why all-male spaces are actively campaigned against. Any place where men gather with other men without women are a target, to the point that feminists are now trying to eliminate gender segregated public bathrooms.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:44 PM
2

Ha! So she's clearly based on Big Red.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:14 AM
14

Historically, this is new. For most of human history, friendships between men were held as the highest form of human bonding, even higher than romantic relations between men and women and parent and child.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 11:18 PM
4

rehab re-education camp FTFY
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:09 PM
2

Yes, I take your point and I agree that you're right in the context you've illustrated. But then again, arguing any men's issues while addressing feminists usually garners the same results.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:54 PM
3

Child abuse.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:14 PM
2

I'm of the exact same opinion.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:30 PM
3

The MRM is critical of western feminists not advocating on behalf of women in the 3rd world, and you're telling us that we shouldn't advocate on behalf of men who are forced into a draft outside of the anglosphere? Get outta here.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:18 AM
2

No problem. In the meantime, we Canucks ought to start one of our own.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:43 PM
1

He admires Lena Dunham. Barf.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:42 PM
2

Damn. Canadians can't sign this.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:31 PM
1

Wait - it's clickbait to link directly to a source instead of to an archive?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:57 AM
1

I see the anti-circ side using shaming language, I agree. But as I stated in my edit, the culture at large shames intact men, not cut ones.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:56 AM
1

Maybe I'm not clear on the rules, but do we have to archive link to everything? It's the National Post.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:18 AM
1

It doesn't matter if something is categorized as a "condition"? How so?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:04 AM
1

Metatarsus adductus, tibia torsion, and femoral anteversion are all medical conditions. I'm open to reading the opinions of medical experts who claim that they aren't if you have citation. Again; treatment for intoeing is recommended because of a pre-existing condition. Circumcision presupposes a potential condition and prescribes a treatment that might not even be required.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 10:41 PM
1

So then aren't you anti-circ when it comes to infants? I'm confused by your position.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 10:35 PM
1

Why were you circumcised, if you don't mind me asking?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:48 PM
1

All of the things you described that women do to make themselves more attractive to men are done by adult women of their own free will, so it's not a valid comparison you're making. If grown men want to get circumcised, then they should be able to ( and they are allowed to). Also, I don't really care if women look all natty because I'm not attracted to them, so it's kind of a moot point for me. I'm not self-loathing or vengeful either, but I don't think I have to be to denounce what I see as an …
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:47 PM
5

Picture of the glans, intact and cut. NSFW Compare and contrast http://www.thedailytransmission.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Natural-v-Cut.jpg
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:45 PM
3

Yep. Long term harm vs. temporary, immediate harm.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:44 PM
1

What was that like? Did you watch the procedure?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:33 PM
5

Over 100 baby boys die every year in the USA due to blood loss or infection resulting from circumcision. http://www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost_Boys_An_Estimate_of_U.S._Circumcision-Related_Infant_Deaths
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:32 PM
1

You need to look at pictures of an intact glans v. the glans of a cut penis.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:27 PM
1

If you hadn't been circumcised as an infant, do you think you would have had the procedure done as an adult?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:24 PM
2

"Women prefer it" Most women in the world have sex with intact men. Secondly, women's opinions should not determine whether or not we permanently alter the genitals of infants, just as men should have no say in whether or not girls should undergo alterations to their vaginas. Thirdly; babies aren't having sex, so the argument that women prefer cut penises is not relevant until someone is sexually active. Finally; I am a gay man and I was circumcised. You presuppose that all men will have sex par…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:20 PM
3

Women have a clitoral prepuce (foreskin or hood) that is analogous to the penile foreskin. The clitoral foreskin can become infected by yeast, thrush, trichomaniasis, herpes, and vaginitis. Women contract yeast infections at significantly higher rates than men. The clitoral foreskin also produces smegma. Smegma buildup produces an unpleasant odour if the clitoral hood is not occasionally cleansed. Yet - no one advocates for the removal of the clitoral prepuce in infancy for girls in order to a) …
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:13 PM
1

Were you in the room for his circumcision?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:57 PM
1

You're right; it doesn't always require treatment. Sometimes it self corrects. It is a medical condition. It is abnormal in that it is not the norm, and if it does not self-correct, treatment is recommended. "The cause of intoeing depends on where the change in alignment is centered. There are three common conditions causing intoeing: Curved foot (metatarsus adductus) Twisted shin (tibia torsion) Twisted thighbone (femoral anteversion) Each of these conditions may run in families. They also can …
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:55 PM
46

A minority woman who was subjected to FGM, is an ex-Muslim who is an outspoken critic of Islam, originates from a 3rd world country, and is critical of Feminism. She is Feminism's worst nightmare. I have much respect for this woman.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:32 PM
2

Have you watched a video of an actual circumcision being performed? Have you seen pictures of a glans on both an intact and cut penis?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:49 PM
3

Follow the money (or the absurd cultural/ religious beliefs).
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:42 PM
3

Women get UTI's and yeast infections at much higher rates than men experience infections as a result of having a foreskin. Do you advocate removing healthy vaginal tissue from infant girls in order to prevent potential infections? Growing evidence supports the notion that the appendix does serve a function. It's a commonly held misconception that the medical community believes it doesn't.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:38 PM
2

Canada fucks around with it, too. I think Australia does as well. Don't forget Israel and most of the ME. I'll add to what you wrote: in the U.S., 100+ baby boys die every year from circumcision and complications resulting from circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:32 PM
2

False analogy: being pigeon toed is an abnormal condition with underlying causes that requires medical treatment. A foreskin is a normal structure of the penis that only requires medical treatment up to and including circumcision (most infections can be treated w/o it) if it presents conditions that interfere with the normal functioning of the penis.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:29 PM
4

Right? Women get yeast infections and UTI's All. The. Time. but no one is advocating that we cut off parts of baby girls' vaginas in order to spare them the ordeal of a potential infection.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:56 AM
3

Are the leg braces administered to the baby due to a serious medical issue?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:51 AM
6

Any intactivist who would shame you for being cut is a jerk. You are entitled to your opinion. For me it is an ethical issue. Cutting off parts of an infant's genitalia is barbaric and cruel IMO. The infant can't consent. The only case where I see it being admissible is in the case of a serious medical condition that interferes with the natural function of the penis.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:48 AM
1

Welcome.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:09 AM
3

They opened the Canadian Centre for Men and Families last year. It's the first of its kind in Canada. From what I understand, they raised all the money to open it on their own (no gov't funding - correct me if I'm wrong). From their website: "The first facility of its kind, we are an open, inclusive and safe space dedicated to the health and well-being of boys, men, fathers and their families. We provides workshops, counseling, discussion groups and a variety of special events. Programs include …
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:06 AM
2

And yet Pride let QuAIA (Queers Against Israeli Apartheid) take part in the parade for years against quite a lot of opposition and despite the fact that Israel is one of the, if not only-full-stop, places in the ME where gays aren't punished for homosexuality.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 07:27 PM
3

Ugh. Nothing but strawmen, character assassination against Trottier, baseless claims, and obfuscation. Toronto is the radical feminist ground-zero of the Western world.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 07:25 PM
3

This happened in the auditorium at the main branch of the Ottawa Public Library. The protesters are affiliated with or members of the Ottawa University Revolutionary Students Movement and its "Feminist Proletariat" arm.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 11:47 AM
1

Feminists and the progs never touched this case because they couldn't demonize white men with it.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:49 AM
24

Help! Men are gathering together, and not to gang rape.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:25 AM
15

"The people united will never be defeated!" Except when somebody tells them the cops are coming. LOL
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:20 AM
18

Are you kidding? They probably earned themselves a scholarship from the women's studies department.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:15 AM
2

Okay, thanks.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:58 AM
2

That's what I figured.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:58 AM
7

Have you seen the video of Janice Fiamengo's talk at Ottawa U? This talk, by the way, wasn't even held on a university campus. It was held in the auditorium of the main branch of the City of Ottawa Public Library.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:45 AM
23

You'd be better off asking that question to a brick wall than to the likes of these clowns in the video.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:21 AM
6

This is Canada. Security would ask them politely to leave and if they said 'no', they'd apologize.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:14 AM
1

Are we allowed to name people here or is that considered doxxing?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:13 AM
2

Emperor Paolpatine
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:52 AM
4

Boys are smarter than to fall for this shit. It's the university students who want to get laid that are the easy targets.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:42 AM
13

Good.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:38 AM
5

This. It is a difference in degree, not in kind.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:38 AM
32

It's embarrassing. They're a bunch of kids on mummy and daddy's dime at university pretending at being revolutionaries. The Junior Stalinist League by way of ramen noodles.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:30 AM
4

Yeah, so can you add some more context? Who's getting their accounts nuked and on what sub-reddits?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:24 AM
5

Context? Mention it where? This is clickbait-y.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:00 AM
1

Well, keep us posted if you decide to take action.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:58 PM
34

Good job filming them. The more we expose them, the more the general public will turn against them.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:46 PM
0

We're already supposed to refer to all women as "goddesses" as it is.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:32 PM
2

They do a lot of good in the community and they also discriminate against members of the community based on sex.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:30 PM
2

You could always contact them anonymously, just to draw attention to it.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:25 PM
3

Where are you? The same thing happened in Vancouver last week and is making headlines. This is insanity.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:22 PM
1

Good for her. See also: Roman Polanski, Bill Clinton
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:27 PM
8

When female teachers have sex/rape their underage male students and the media and a large portion of the public paint as him "wanting it" and as "the best thing that could ever happen to him." Then the courts don't punish the woman or give her a light sentence.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:51 PM
2

Even better; a baby boy getting part of his genitals sliced off is totally legal.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:17 AM
1

Except I think a majority of women think this is ridiculous too.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:53 AM
1

Any reading recommendations that will give me more insight into this?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:53 AM
1

This is what I want to know: how can there be so much obvious opposition and dismissal from the general public on these issues, yet the media, government, the academy, and courts favour these outlandish agendas and premises? Why is there such a disconnect between the two? What is really going on?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:18 AM
31

White men need to stop reading so much. White men need to stop voting so much. White men need to stop living so much. /s
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:34 PM
1

Tell me again why we're supposed to care what Hollywood movie stars who pretend to be comic book characters for a living think about social issues?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:13 PM
2

Agreed. I have sympathy for trans people. I do not think it's okay to cut off healthy body parts in order to 'become' the opposite gender, nor do I feel the need to participate in his delusion by referring to him as 'she'. He is XY and always will be.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:11 PM
16

From the article: 'Men need to realize that despite the fact that it’s a staple in pornography, their girlfriends, their mothers, their daughters may really not be enjoying this. It may not be something they want to engage in because it doesn’t feel good to them and it’s not authentic." It's your fault that strong, empowered women with agency decide to make out with each other and then regret it later, dudes. /s
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:57 PM
1

Sorry man. Canadian here. Hope you get something going though! Keep us posted.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:53 PM
6

What a good sock puppet.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:58 AM
1

Funny that in Canada every Minister responsible for the Status of Women since 1981 has been a woman.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 01:31 AM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:48 PM
215

Women can't be held responsible for their actions. They are to be treated as children. That is what this boils down to as far as the courts are concerned.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:52 AM
2

No idea - I don't go to McGill.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:49 AM
3

I don't really care how it ends, as long as it does.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:40 AM
1

It's already starting to fall apart.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:39 AM
18

Let's have a Minister of Finance who's a gambler.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:36 AM
3

Yeah, it'll happen. Just like it did with the Satanists molesting all the kids in the 80s. Or the Salem Witch Trials. It's mass hysteria.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:16 AM
1

That's like arguing people with lung cancer shouldn't sue tobacco companies.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:14 AM
0

There's plenty of cut guys who feel that they had their rights violated.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:11 AM
1

Please tell me this was /s so I don't have to down vote more than you've already been.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:10 AM
1

I've always thought that this would be a good idea but I'm not clear on the specifics of who exactly would be sued.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:10 AM
9

What we also need is gatherings with lots and lots of young men. There needs to be a bit of re-branding of the MRM in my opinion. We need to show that dynamic, passionate, creative young men take these issues seriously and want to affect change.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:05 AM
5

"Men Dying" signs would be better given the rate at which men die on construction sites. Of course the feminists would never advocate for that.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:55 AM
4

Sit down and shut up. While we abolish you. Shitlords.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:10 PM
12

Her feelz were real, so fuck your "evidence" shitlords! /s
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:09 PM
17

And the guy who was accused will learn a valuable lesson.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:08 PM
3

When the public hits critical mass as far as realizing this is all a media driven propaganda and ratings scheme, it will collapse overnight. That time is fast approaching.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:07 PM
22

In 10 years time, campus rape hysteria will be viewed the same way the "Satanists are molesting children everywhere!" hysteria in the 80's is viewed today.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:06 PM
2

Nice trolling. Don't you have a bridge somewhere you should be under?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:40 PM
2

A lot of your post is mixing up MRAs with PUAs. Red pill, beta, alpha...these are all terms and concepts used by TRP and PUA communities. MRAs are focused on issues that affect men and boys, like media vilification, false rape accusations, fathers rights, circumcision, the boy crisis, suicide, etc. etc. You need to do more research on the differences between these movements. Most Red Pill and PUA men do not consider themselves MRAs. Apart from that, I agree with many of your other points. I do t…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:34 PM
1

Yeah. Basically all this amounts to is "I like to suck cut cocks!"
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:27 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:05 AM
2

Women feel anger and fear because of men, of course.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:05 AM
5

It's an attack on traditionalism and Christianity. God the Father is referred to as such not because 'he' has a sex but because his role in Christianity is most analogous to the traditional role of a father to his children in human societies. I'm atheist so I really have no dog in this fight, but I can definitely see it for what it is. It's an attempt to weaken the foundation upon which Christianity is built. If these female priests want a goddess religion, then they'd be better off being Wiccan…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:24 PM
5

The whole idea of romantic love as idealized in our culture is really based on desperation, neediness, and co-dependency. It was traumatic for me when I first realized this. Then after I had let it sit for a while, it became liberating.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 04:25 AM
4

Stop pursuing inner happiness as a goal. It's impossible. Your goal should be to become aware of your inner peace. Happiness is an emotional state and thus will always be temporary. If you make happiness your goal, you will always be in an endless race and will always end up unhappy. Enjoy happiness when it comes and let it go when it passes. Happiness is an emotion like sadness or anger or fear. They are temporary states. Go deeper within yourself and find your foundation which is deeper than e…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 04:15 AM
4

Happiness is ephemeral and fleeting, like all emotions. That so many people pursue happiness as a permanent state (something that is impossible) is why so much unhappiness exists. The delusion is so strong it's even written into the Constitution! No, the goal is inner peace. Be at peace internally and happiness becomes an enjoyable, temporary state. One you know won't last, so you don't give it any more importance that any other emotional state (which you also know won't last, either). Observe y…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 03:56 AM
0

No, better that we should waste everyone's time by double posting for your benefit, dumb ass.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:12 AM
-1

So every day we should repost every link because you might've missed it, instead of you going back a few days to catch up on what you missed. Okay.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 11:15 PM
-1

Do a search first before posting. It's really simple.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 10:43 PM
4

Lindy West is worried. Good.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:24 PM
-10

Down voting because this was already posted a couple of days ago.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:47 PM
1

Heh. I will edit it to make some.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:32 PM
0

" We give up our assholes for some random Chad." I bet you do, OP.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 06:36 AM
3

Yes, I hadn't considered it from that perspective. Very good observation.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:33 AM
3

People who cite statistics or research in support of the contentious claims of health benefits of circumcision still have to answer the ethical and moral argument. I'm sure there is data showing the economic benefits of slavery to a society, but nobody would argue that that would somehow make enslaving another human being okay.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:06 AM
11

They also wanted to keep the men away from the children because pedophiles.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:53 AM
3

Seconded.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:54 AM
5

This is satire, right? Please let it be satire.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:21 AM
3

"Privilege", says the white, female judge sentencing him to life in prison.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 12:09 AM
2

And if said condom fails?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:18 AM
2

Yeah I didn't being up Shiny Pony at all because I don't think the Liberals have any real shot at winning right now. You've brought up some really salient and interesting points to consider with regards to the NDP.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:16 AM
1

Yeah but Leia killed Jabba so she'd just use that as another feminist selling point.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:14 AM
3

Agreed. We need to start coming up with better ideas of how to combat feminism as opposed to jjust griping. There needs to be a revolution within the MRM in that respect.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:20 AM
2

You may be on to something there.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:10 AM
6

Wow. Where was this if you don't mind me asking? *edited: I read the rest of the thread and I see where you are located. Cheers.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:18 AM
7

Consent to sex is consent to parenthood for a man. Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood for a woman. The system is rigged in favour of women and against men. Never forget this.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:15 AM
1

Yes. Fuck the CBC.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:00 AM
1

Man I hope so. If Mulcair gets in they'll all get a raise.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:00 AM
0

Dump her immediately. This will happen again. You don't deserve this and she doesn't love or respect you if she is physically violent with you. Do not question this - door slam her immediately.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:53 AM
1

This is exactly what we need to need. As a movement we absolutely need to become more tactical about how we confront Feminism. Just for clarification; do you mean "tenants" or "tenets"? Both could be applicable in the context of what you're saying.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:45 AM
2

What set me off initially was his (I know; impossible to tell) initial line about acknowledging the achievements of men as "stupid". I do take your point though in that I missed his main point which was about the divide and conquer strategy. I did attempt to address that by pointing out that feminism is responsible for divide and conquer but I think it might have gotten lost in the rest of the essay! I've actually noticed that about myself; I'm too quick to respond without first taking a bit of …
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:16 AM
7

That's a very good point. I think as MRAs we should be extremely diligent in how we handle and interpret data. I hate to think that AVFM could be as guilty of playing with stats and polls as Feminists are. That's what worries me about the movement.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:10 AM
4

CBC is state-sponsored propaganda.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:22 PM
8

In Canada, Homolka's deal with the authorities is generally referenced to as "the Deal with the Devil."
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:21 PM
1

I'm looking for criticism of what I wrote as well. It helps strengthen any position. Please give me some constructive feedback. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:19 PM
1

Thanks man.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:17 PM
1

http://www.avoiceformen.com/featured/new-poll-results-the-decimation-of-feminism/
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:16 PM
2

I doubt the ugnaughts would mind.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:25 AM
9

I'd like to see a statue of Anita Sarkeesian frozen in carbonite.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:16 AM
5

This is from 2013. Any more recent updates?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:05 AM
2

I think what's happening here is that some of them are beginning to see the writing on the wall. Public sentiment against feminists and SJW's is growing. People in the U.S. identifying as feminist has dropped ten percent (from 28% to 18%) in the last three years. Hess and some of her comrades are realizing that there's only so far they can push before they get pushed back - hard. The tide is turning and in a manner she's smart. She's recognizing the shift in attitudes. I see this as a sign of fe…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:04 AM
9

Once someone's decided they're going to put your penis in their mouth, a small ridge of skin behind the head is not going to be a deal-breaker.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:31 PM
3

Milo is in general pro-MRA and anti-feminist. It's a surprising about-face for him.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:15 PM
1

Who gives a shit what Feminists think? I'm well past the point of being concerned whether or not I meet their requirements for acceptable behaviour. Kindly refrain from policing my expression for the sake of 'civility'.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:53 PM
1

"Sit down and shut up while we abolish you." -SJW's to white dudes.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:34 PM
1

She looks pretty white to me. Oops. I used the 'pretty' in relation to Mustafa. My bad.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:34 PM
3

Yes, but that is not the crux of his argument. His overriding point is that it is what women want. I believe that his entire position is based solely on his own desires but that he disingenuously projects this onto women in order to make his argument 'safer' for this particular audience. He doesn't give a shit what women want (nor should he).
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:17 PM
3

You think so? In what way? I think he otherwise has a lot of interesting things to say and I give him credit for taking on feminists and supporting #GamerGate. I find him witty too, which ups his cred. He definitely got it wrong on this one, though.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:12 PM
13

infant boys' future sex lives FTFY
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:06 PM
2

I think it's worth reading for an alternative viewpoint. They have some interesting columnists.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:03 PM
3

I'm not going to discredit and disavow the guy because I still think he has a lot of good things to say. He also has a right to his opinion and to express it. I will even acknowledge his acerbic wit in this article. He's a good writer and he's funny. He's done a lot for #GamerGate and fighting Feminism. This, however, comes across as a screed on his own personal predilections and desires couched in the 'safer' argument of a plea to female desire. He obviously prefers cut penises in his partners …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:01 PM
5

I love doing this on packed buses or trains. I'm not paying fare so that you can use up a seat for your shopping bags or purses, assholes.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:50 PM
4

"Female comedian". The two least sexy words in the English language when used in tandem.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:34 AM
5

No because it will shame cut men.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:31 AM
3

She's never had an idependent thought in her life . She's not about to start now.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:46 AM
1

Most Hollywood product is SJW shit now. It's best to ignore it. Don't give them your money. You won't miss it.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:40 AM
2

We have to balance righteous outrage with a sense of humour. The idiot dad trope is overdone but I find that in general people are finally starting to notice it and question it. This to me is harmless and while not particularly funny, it's not particularly offensive either. I don't want to see men and MRAs become humourless shrews like feminists. We have to maintain a sense of humour and irreverence. There is power in laughing some things off and focusing on more pressing goals.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:33 PM
1

McInnes has a specific style when interviewing. A lot of people find him off-putting but I think it has its place in the broader dialogue. I personally find him very funny and I thought this interview was effective at exposing the mindless SJW bullshit zombies like this woman spew.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:28 PM
1

I'm fucking sick of labels and the divisions they create. Calling myself an MRA just gives my opponents an easy way to discredit me and dismiss my arguments. I don't give them that ammunition to use against me. I advocate for specific issues and against specific agendas. When they try to label me as MRA I can easily turn it around on them and challenge them as to why they feel the need to label me and not address the actual issues. So no, I wouldn't label myself egalitarian either.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:20 PM
23

Canada is ground zero for feminist gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 07:04 PM
10

Here's the original report: http://www.ottawasun.com/2015/05/15/cops-look-for-suspect-in-vicious-attack The attack is described as "gender-based" before the veracity of the attack is even established. The city counsellor even wonders if the alleged attacker is "opposed to [all] women or just her" because of course all men are evil oppressors and women would never lie about something like this. We live in a sick society.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:27 AM
3

Dude, no. I'm Canadian too. You're playing to a stereotype. Stop saying sorry.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 04:50 AM
2

You're right to assume I'm not advocating censorship or physical force. By destroy, I mean expose it. I agree; once exposed it will collapse under its own weight.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:02 AM
9

Mr. Rogers was alpha as fuck. He commanded the attention of everyone; men, women, children. His self-respect was palpable. He had expectations of you. You could not deny him. His presence was powerful and quietly assertive. Do not mistake kindness with weakness. He was a paternal father figure, the kind that you would never want to let down. You would not want to fuck with that man. Not because he would hurt you, but because you would disappoint him. That's alpha.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 11:21 PM
1

Gay men aren't oppressed. Neither are white women. Cultural Marxism just wants you to believe it so. I'm a same-sex attracted man. McGowan can suck my dick.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 06:50 AM
1

I am a same-sex attracted man. He's right; that is sass and hysterical emotion in your comment. You sound bitchy. Calm down, get your points across without attitude, and engage in respectful, adult discourse, even when you disagree. Man up.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 06:31 AM
1

I agree with you. Can't be trusted as a group. The reality is that most gay men don't really care about marriage, and don't even want to get married. They just go along with the agenda because like most humans, they're stupid and too lazy to think independently. Gay marriage is absolutely agenda-based and its end-goal is the destruction of the traditional family. It is Marxist. Straights have obviously contributed to this as well through the high divorce rate, Feminism, and all the sundry SJW bu…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 06:15 AM
1

I never considered myself feminist but I always believed women were an oppressed class and victimized by men. I believed this because this is what society taught me. It is how I was indoctrinated (yes, I'm using that word. It is accurate). Then I happened to see the video of the Warren Farrell protest in Toronto. After that, everything changed for me. Total paradigm shift. Red pill. That was 3 years ago. I consider myself egalitarian. But I believe that feminism, in its current incarnation, is a…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:18 AM
1

Hi! Gay MRA here. Was at the Janice Fiamengo event last night in Ottawa.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:45 AM
1

Sorry, I didn't realize it had been posted already. This was my first post. Is there a way to check to make sure I'm not re-posting something?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:35 PM
1

Darn, I thought I posted it. This is my first reddit post. I was just reading the FAQ to see what I did wrong. Can you help me please? How do I post the link?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter