TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tzaanthor Archive

View 0 posts and 737 comments by tzaanthor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This isn't reasonable, stop it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 07:17 AM
2

Welcome to masculinity. A carepackage of male privilege has been dispatched to you. Please use the activation code provided to get a 20% instant wage bonus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 07:56 AM
2

I work in commerce, so I chose 'other'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/24 08:12 AM
6

Australia’s ‘crisis of male violence against women’ reflects a growing gender divide triggered by alienation and resentment Resentment and alienation? Are you sure it'snot male privilege and leaving the toilet seat up researchers say Whoa whoa whoa. Science and resean have a place, and crafting gender balanced policy isn't one of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/24 05:25 AM
1

Minority means weaker, not smaller or fewer. Minority groups are frequently larger than the majority. People say 'numerical majority', which does mean more numerous, but it's not the only form of majority.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/24 05:42 AM
2

Consider why it just so happened to be that all feminist leadership just happened to be non-TERF. It's not. They just annexed trans rights as an issue du jour. Five minutes ago they were literally the ONLY group bashing trans people, and have been doing so for 60 years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 08:44 AM
1

I consider shitting a feminist act.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 08:42 AM
1

Lol no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 08:41 AM
-1

If actual genocide isn't a red line for you, you're lost. You're the one doing that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 07:50 AM
2

A liberal sub is full of bologna. No pickles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 07:49 AM
8

Show me where "obamacare" was a republican plan. Show me that plan. He's right. It was Romneycare. From the heritage foundation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 07:48 AM
2

It's not a slur, it just sounds like the most sarcastic thing ever
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 07:45 AM
8

When I say The Straights are not okay I am genuinely concerned. How can you think this would be perceived so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 07:45 AM
22

Loneliness cannot be self inflicted, it's a communal failure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/24 07:52 AM
1

Nope Andrew Tate is black so theyre incels and they dont care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 07:09 AM
2

Having read the article I'm simalarly unenthused.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 07:04 AM
4

Hillary is hardly far left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 06:59 AM
6

It implies if not outright states that advocacy for women is ‘far left’ when it’s liberal idpol at best Or pink consevatism at worst... or even pink fascism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 06:58 AM
3

I just looked at that sub for the first time and jesus those are some fucking losers, every post is just tearing down people over innocuous comments and jokes to a degree that is more disgusting than the actual cringy shit they're whining about. I'm not sure why you'd even bother posting there, they're the biggest losers I've seen all week.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 09:13 AM
3

How is it cringe? Feminism doesn't have a copyright to Women's Social Advocacy. He means the antifeminist movement, which is a specific brand of opposition to feminism that does not include women's advocacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 09:04 AM
1

Pushing out more than just moderates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 09:02 AM
0

As a male: I gotta say it's utterly alien and unreal to think that someone would do that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 06:34 PM
1

Might want to do two things: 1. Send emails to the relevant resources of Reddit regarding their company policies. 2. When that does nothing, shop this around to every publication that you think might be sympathetic to mens rights. Be sure to document all your evidence and show them...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 06:06 AM
2

Boners Also boners dont contain 'bones'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 06:03 AM
6

I bet the feminists are all sedate and happy with how they're done and got everything they want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 03:02 AM
3

Don't, he's crazy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:57 AM
4

Aye.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/24 04:01 PM
10

Well you see a common way to get rid of undesirables is something called 'bussing' where you force them onto busses. So it's a black joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/24 05:52 AM
6

No one can make you hate. That's a choice you make for yourself. Those ideologies only give you an excuse
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/24 05:18 AM
10

...if you're not attractive to them... This assumes that they're talk about objectification isn't projection too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/24 05:17 AM
2

It's onto the bus That's quite likely... half of these people aren't hateful they're sociopaths.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/24 05:15 AM
3

The obvious hypocrisy falls on deaf ears because they genuinely don't belief it's sexist and/or proudly defend the sexism as justified due to the "woman are oppressed, men the oppressor" dynamic. Third option: they're trolls and only care about upsetting people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/24 06:06 PM
8

I just looked at the thread, and my god what a bunch of feckless halfwits. Literally most posts are 'the reaction to discrimination is the art'. You know: they're admitting they're trolls. Feminism is trolls. Just like regular conservatives, most feminists are just trying to 'own the libs', rather than achieve any policy change. I saw one response that was funny: 'the wage gap is just a performance piece'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/24 06:05 PM
1

Don't smile at them, they think it's a form of harassment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/24 09:33 AM
1

Rhetorical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/24 09:31 AM
4

And if you can't trust studies and you can't trust personal experience, what can you trust? Nothing. It's called 'skepticism', and it's how you can avoid embarrassing yourself constantly by mistaking individual patterns from universal ones. Also you're doubting his personal experience like ten times per post, so if you want to be taken seriously you'd best start believing everything he says without question, since you 'trust' his personal experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/24 09:30 AM
5

The truth is, women receive conflicting messaging all the time. "Be careful but not too much since someone may take it personally. But also if you're not careful enough, what happens as a result is your fault." Everyone ever receives that for everything at all times, and it is foolish to think this is in any way meaningful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/24 09:26 AM
27

Almost as if they want to cloak themselves in the mantle of antiracism while being racist themselves... like those right wing comme tators saying MLK would be a conservative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/24 07:19 AM
44

Also Andrew Tate overwhelmingly appeals to men of colour... which these critiques seem to forget to mention every time... so we know it's not a case of 'privilege' in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/24 07:15 AM
-5

Make them hot women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 08:21 PM
3

Daemonic. The love of money is the root of all evil. #mammon #greedisgod #bitcoin
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 05:00 AM
19

'I'm just trying to be cute!' FUCK YOU, WHORE, MEN ARE SHIT PRAISE KHORNE
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 04:58 AM
4

We've got to get children off of social media. Then maybe adults.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 04:55 AM
7

Privilege more like
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 04:54 AM
12

Also they taint our political parties, discrediting them and wasting our powder on 'manspreading', and 'stare rape'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 04:54 AM
8

female gaze Can we not use that 'gaze' cliche? It's not a real problem, it's a paranoid delusion, according to the DSM.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 04:53 AM
10

So many women were complaining about the Simone Biles approaching her husband first. Saying how this makes her look desperate. And also saying her husband is downplaying her accomplishments by calling himself the prize. Because he is less successful than Simon Biles. I had a feeling he wouldn't be white when I looked him up. What a coincidence. Almost as if they're latently conservative bigots who hop onto the opportunity to lynch the first black man they see doing something they don't like. By …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 04:50 AM
2

In our increasingly narcissistic culture, romantic relationships have become ruthlessly transactional, at least for many in Gen Z. I think you may find that they're looking back on the relationships of the past and retroactively looking at them as equally transactional and exploitative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 04:40 AM
1

No, it was both of them. You provably saw elsewhere that it was just him, like I saw elsewhere. Because sexism used to be a thing. She's also the test driver... and the first person to drive a car ever. Wasn’t the first computer also made by Charles Babbage? Like many inventions it's not so simple as one creator. Basically: he invented the calculator, and she invented the computer; the idea of using it as more than just a caculator is hers, and she pioneered it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/24 11:39 PM
2

Kind of... basically he created a calculator, which would become the computer, and she pointed out that it could be used as a computer rather than just a calculator. The idea of using the machine for purposes beyond calculation was hers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/24 11:35 PM
3

No cars. The automobile was invented by a man and wife team, the Benzs, as in mercedes-Benz no computer That was invented by a woman. Everything else is right, though. Although I wouldn't say electricity, since that's more of a phenomenon than an invention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/24 06:41 AM
2

Are you sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/24 12:27 AM
4

Lets not go too far, the vast majority of women disagree with that, and the plurality of hardcore feminists will begrudgingly admit they need us, even if they hate us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/24 12:24 AM
4

While the men are seen as a threat. By everybody too
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/24 09:58 AM
6

Never thought I'd see it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/24 10:22 PM
1

Is called fundamentalism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 06:11 AM
6

how do you even fix that level of demonization and mass hysteria? they're doing far more damage than good. Make it as loud and visible as possible. There's a reason why feminism was getting more unpopular over time... although the trump years have been their greatest recruiting tool in decades.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 06:01 AM
3

I'm more afraid of living alone than dying alone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 05:55 AM
10

Literally half of men are weaker than the other half. I don't know how feminists protect themselves from this basic fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 05:54 AM
1

also claiming to speak for women- “women’s biggest fear”…. this isn’t my biggest fear- Good point... our biggest fears are likely in common despite our differences in sex. Also rape as 'a fate worse than death' is a mysogynist trope rooted in a woman's worth being her virginity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 05:52 AM
3

getting raped in prison, climate change affecting the future generations, losing their job, becoming homeless, or never escaping poverty. Being beaten to death by the police, especially since hes the whitest bitch on earth. Also being sentenced to life slavery in prison for... nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 05:49 AM
1

I’ve seen Kathy smurthwaite live, a total joke of a performer Fucking smurfs. #gargamelwasright
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/24 05:44 AM
2

be twink not afraid of being raped Lol what.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/24 05:43 AM
0

I'm less concerned with them, sonce in my experience they tend not to blame everything on their sexe, and try to drag men down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/24 08:52 PM
0

What makes you think Lois Lane is a feminist. She seems more likely to be a 'lean in' type to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/24 05:59 AM
17

Most of those who were unable to participate were poor immigrant workers whose problems have more to do with economic class than gender. And race. And nationality. And other things that actually matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/24 05:56 AM
-2

That post should have been 2-3 paragraphs IMHO. A paragraph is supposed to complete a thought, not be measured by sentences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 10:14 PM
0

Notice that I did not say they think it will lead to an increase in extramarital cheating. I didn't actually... but while I'm here I should mention that for people with learning disabilities, we frequently have trouble reading large blocks of text, so a paragraph or indent really helps us with legibility.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 08:22 PM
42

The major reasons I've seen from women who are against sex workers is either they think it will lead to severe increases in human trafficking OR they believe it will lead to an increase in men seeking sex outside of committed relationships. And the real reason is becuase they fear it will liberate men from commitment to women in exchange for sex. Because they're conservatives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 07:36 PM
5

Internized patrionomy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 07:35 PM
1

Link: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2024/feb/01/gen-z-boys-and-men-more-likely-than-baby-boomers-to-believe-feminism-harmful-says-poll
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 07:31 PM
2

You'd be surprised how stupid some people are
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 07:17 AM
2

We dub thee: Sir Wanks-a-lot, knight of the Circular Jerks... Also I can't think of a way to work this in, but Cumelot. I need to be a porn writer. Edit: oo, what about knights of the 'Pound table'?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 12:31 AM
2

That's hardly unique.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 12:29 AM
-2

Nope, all lies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 12:25 AM
3

What could labour, a party named after labour unions, do to promote men's interests? It's not like most labour is male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 12:25 AM
6

Jesus Christ, that's stupid. Better idea, moron: make labour a pro male party that doesn't need propaganda to trick men into supporting you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 12:24 AM
1

Or chaos spawned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 11:21 PM
2

I had an epiphany about this just now. Did you see that guardian article from a few days ago? There are some random innocuous comments about race that make no sense in the context of the article, unless you consider them as xenophobia. Obviously there is a limited amount of space in an article, so when you say 'he spoke in a racialised dialect to a non white audience' , it's because you have a point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 09:26 AM
1

'Misogyny is natural part of being a healthy male' -feminism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 06:18 AM
1

Give into your anger, let the hare flow through you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 06:17 AM
1

Beyond your comprehension.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 06:11 AM
1

Decepticon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:54 AM
2

I mean yes, but also my sister who has a masters in dramatherapy and is as left leaning as it comes She holds a right wing position on men's rights, that makes her not left wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:53 AM
1

But no...apparently some women actually are hypergamous, embrace it 100%, and also see it as a valid successful lifestyle. Wild, my dude. Fucking wild. It's like 30% of women who follow the hypergamous reproductive strategy. Another 30% fucks anything they can get their hands on, and the last 30% is balanced.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:40 AM
3

I used to be on purple pill debate But then I took an arrow to the knee.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:37 AM
5

Anything with women in it is feminist... By which I mean feminists corrupt any women's space and silence all other viewpoints.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:36 AM
1

They are also very homophobic towards gay meb Oh wow, how unexpected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:33 AM
12

Pft, I got banned for saying segregation was bad. Not women segregated from men. Blacks and whites segregated. Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever -askfeminists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:32 AM
2

Yeah, I was surprised how amenible fascists are to left wing talki g points... maybe it's just a fluke, but usually I've been able to appeal to their sense of populism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:20 AM
1

I find it interesting that they will always complain about men overrunning women's spaces, and attempting to disrupt their conversation. However, it is rare to see this happening in the other direction in comparison. You know how they complain that they're a minority, and that the whole world is rigged against them, and if they step out of their spaces they'll be torn apart by jackals? They believe it. When they accidently brigade a forum, they realise this isn't true, and don't stop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:18 AM
1

If you die you lose all your money, so no, it's cheaper.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:16 AM
1

There are forms of excercise that are less cliched ways to die. She could light a stick of dynamite in a dark room, and then realise it's not a candle, or she could get crushed by an anvil. Those are more novel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:15 AM
1

Find whatever majority group they belong to and demand they answer for it. Are they straight? White? Christian? Catholic? Protestant? Old? Able? Right handed? They belong to some group that's fucked up society, make them answer for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:11 AM
6

Not the guy you're asking but Two things: They say it in the identical phrasing of racist tropes, which is either a dog whistle, or a freudian slip They disproportionately target minority men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:07 AM
9

Sometimes I see straight up racist takes veiled as feminism, and it’s wild. (I’m Black btw) I was literally just talking about this last week to my father. Yeah, I see it too. Also when you say you have an opinion, and they blame you for being white, and you're like 'Im not fucking white' and then they without skipping a fucking beat are like: well you're a man. And if you didn't see the post about andrew tate a couple of weeks ago that highlights how racialised his audience is, I think a big pa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 09:05 AM
10

I completely agree with you. I get sick of it when someone uses their traumas as an excuse. I was raped by a woman and I'm still able to differentiate between "that person was bad" and "all women are bad" and I hold other people to the same standard. Exactly. Not to compare my much less severe situation to yours, but I've been fucked over by women in terrible ways that were stereotypically female, lying and crybullying, but I literally never even thought that I should be able to blame a whole se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 08:57 AM
0

The context especially the earlier thread in which this is being discussed is to pathologize male virginity as if they are diseased patients who will turn into monsters and somehow sex workers are doctors who will cure them. Is that why so much porn has a medical theme and setting? https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/5196e6da-d6e8-42bb-b608-fd1f5cd6b305
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 10:08 PM
1

It is irrelevant what gender the leaders of every country is. It's literally the one thing we're talking about. It's the only thing that is relevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 10:09 AM
1

Almost every elected leader of every country ever has been a male, in no way can this be called an advantage for females. Similarly, most representatives of almost every country of every level are also male. You might as well say women hold clerical power and, or that every pope has been a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/24 05:56 AM
1

Yeah, but those are not political advantages, those are legal and social adcantages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/24 12:40 AM
2

More importantly feminism as we know it today, which has become an oligarchic priesthood of 'gender balance'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/24 06:08 AM
1

How are women the minority though? Minority means weaker, not smaller. You're thinking of a 'numerical minority', which is not the same thing as when discussing power dynamics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/24 06:06 AM
1

Yes, I'd agree to that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 06:43 AM
2

One isn't necessarily rightist for critiquing what is widely acceptable as Science and Law. I did not mean to say that one is... and to be clear: I'm saying that they oppose the hierchichal structure of science and law, not the practice of law or science. There have been many conceptions throughout history that have been widely believed to be science; the gender-pay gap a massive example of this I think that's certifiable as pseudoscience
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 06:43 AM
11

Some of the stats are true. For example, men do commit murder more, which is a sociological problem. Men have greater economic pressures (risk of homelessness) put on them while also having less opportunities for success (lower educational attainment) and lower access to effective mental health care. Of course they would be prone to a higher degree of criminality. Also at a societal level men are taught violence is an admissible answer... but the 'efforts' to combat this social problem are blami…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 12:23 AM
15

Well said. Workplace deaths? Conservatives oppose unions and regulatory agencies. Incarceration? Conservatives are "tough on crime". Homelessness? Conservatives oppose wage increases. Suicide? Conservatives promote male stoicism and oppose gun control. Conversly: slam dunk materiel that the left could win every election for 100 straight years if they tried to pitch these to men. But outreach to the male vote is tabou.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 12:11 AM
30

We have no friend or allies, only interests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 12:10 AM
12

The right is largely about upholding hierarchies, A bit pedantic maybe, but I think it's better said that the right is largely about upholding institutions, not hierarchies. For example they are plenty keen on breaking down hierarchies within science, the administrative state, and law... you know, the good ones that hold back their rapacious agenda of rule by fiat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 12:09 AM
1

I'm trying to understand this, why would gender discussions be entangled in two opposing political philosophies? Two things: The left is in the habit of defending the weaker group's interests, while the right defends the stronger's. Since women are the minority in most cases, this means the left targets women as it's voting base, while the right targets men. Both sides wrongly extrapolate that men are ALWAYS the ones with power, and women are ALWAYS the ones out of power. And since the voting bl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 12:04 AM
2

(Actually, men were burnt more often We need to talk bout this more... also the first waves of witch burnings targeted the men, THEN next targeted women. Men died first, and more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/24 09:38 AM
19

Yeah, men are too privileged, but not privileged enough to want them as a voting bloc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/24 09:36 AM
1

As others have mentioned, there is no need to make these protections gender-specific other than to reduce resources by excluding victims outside of the definition. Those Finnish, Latvian, Austrian (among others) males better fulfill their military duties though (/s). To gain the support of feminist groups, and avert the ire of them. Also, it's a way to reduce spending by prioritising need to one group, and then characterising attacks on the sexist/racist/xenophobic nature of the law as sexist/ra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/24 05:36 AM
1

Might want to drop that fact on her superiors... especially if her course has a morality or ethics clause... and if they don't do anything or say fuck you, drop that fact to whatever media outlets you have access to. I don't mean drop her name publicly, to be clear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/24 05:32 AM
1

I was called an Incel simply for Yeah. We know. We've all been called incels for anything, no matter how stupid. It happens to everyone ever. Even women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/24 05:29 AM
2

Also women control most social capital in the exact same way that men control most economic capital, which turns social welfare into a matriarchal system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/24 05:27 AM
1

Support from feminist groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/24 05:24 AM
1

The point is that we are not JUST talking about calories. I said that it's a simple and cheap way to add calories to a meal, which is a world apart from taking a swig of oil for a meal. You did say that, you just don't know it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 07:16 PM
4

He's wrong. You can't just add another scoop of olive oil to your diet, men need ALL nutrients in higher amounst, and this is going to get worse in the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 06:37 AM
1

A few extra tablespoons of cooking oil will add another 500 calories to one's food. Or better yet lets cut out all food from your diet, and survive on vegetable oil instead. Oh wow, you solved world hunger, lets just ship a bunch of vegetable oil to Ethiopia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 06:32 AM
2

If you look at the value paid vs. received the pink tax is probably in reverse since shopping is not in men's gender role. But this will be blamed on men the second it's evident as our fault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 06:30 AM
3

I don't even understand what the pink tax is actually about Is about nothing. They distort statistics to make it look like there is a discrepancy between products ostensibly bought by women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 06:28 AM
4

I am still confused what's holding women back from buying the male version of products. 90% of the argument is 'we shouldnt have to'... because that's how life works apparently.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 06:27 AM
5

If you think that's bad, wait until you see the protein tax.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 06:26 AM
1

Pretty sure none of those celebrities are respectedn Imams, dude.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/24 06:23 AM
1

It is. It occurs in wvery culture in every country across tge world, even in cultures isolated from every other culture. If that's not biology, that's magic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 11:22 PM
0

Are you seriously gatekeeping against gatekeeping. Also, the rule applies to people, not the ideas, which the rule explicitly states ARE valid targets... btw: actually read the fine... frequently you'll find that they're not what they seem. That's why I went to read them just now,because I found what you said unlikely... and it wasn't accurate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 11:21 PM
2

I think hypergamy is based in ego, not sexual attraction. It's a biological function.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 06:56 AM
3

Money is the mana of western society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 06:55 AM
4

We're at war... Ah yes, total war. Maybe we should round up Russo Americans into concentration camps too, just to be sure. And "Russia" isn't even a race, its a citizenship. Definitively wrong, Russians are one of the three Slavic races, Czechs, Poles and Russians. The nationstate of russia derives it's name from their people, just as the other two nations do. And also discriminating against someone for their national status is also racism... btw. At least according to definitions like the UNs. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 06:44 AM
4

Gatekeeping doesn't mean the reasonable enforcement of participation rules It does. it's not gatekeeping when the mods delete spam comments about dick pills or whatever, or clear trolls not here for legitimate debate. It definitively is. But within the rules Walls ...there is space for discussion about women's issues, as long as topics relate to male issues and that people hold egalitarian values. That's literally what gatekeeping means. Unlike your futa fetish, women's issues are often relevant…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 06:41 AM
3

We don't want to be exclusionary and gatekeepy like so many feminist spaces tend to be. Gatekeeping is a term daemonised by feminists and other groups that want to stroll in and dictate how everything must be run to their satisfaction for sake of inclusion. We should be gatekeeping: you must have specific intents and aims to participate. Women's rights are NOT to be included in our spaces, if you want that, go to a women's rights space. I like womens rights, but I also like hyperendowed futa hor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/24 03:31 AM
1

I don't agree. The problem with those spaces is not that they don't centre men's rights as part of the discussion, its that they're hateful and toxic. As long as we dont hate women, and dont foster hate we've done our part. I'm not saying you cant do this, but Im saying its not integral.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/24 03:27 AM
6

Allowing people Russian (and Casual racism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/24 03:21 AM
4

TRP What's TRP. This is not a gray area. A woman's right to choose is an inarguable pillar of any left-wing belief system. Maybe on Mars, but on this planet antichoice policy has always been a part of the left, and still is, dont fool yourself... also plenty of other mysogynistic policies are and have been popular on the left. To be clear: I'm prochoice. But the fact that antichoice policy is a left vs. Right wing issue is ahistorical, and it's only become that way recently. Antichoice policy wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/24 03:15 AM
1

The good feminists never seem to hold the bad feminists accountable. The 'good' feminists don't even accept that the bad ones exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/24 11:58 PM
2

It's fucking necromancy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/24 06:08 AM
47

This is literally just an ad for feminist consultants.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/24 12:22 AM
84

Some parents of boys worry that they are treated less sympathetically than their female peers. “My son is reluctant to go to school due to bullying by a group of girls,” says one woman from Derby, who wants to remain anonymous. “He feels that there is a big power difference in schools, where boys are always punished, not listened to, and not believed.” This is objective fucking fact, not 'feelings'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/24 12:19 AM
15

we need to show them Are you sure they didn't say 'tell them'?because if they said show them they have learned something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/24 12:09 AM
11

and white women aint gonna defend yall They're the ones throwing us under the bus to get away from their own legacy of being privileged for the same length of time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/24 12:00 AM
3

Hear hear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/24 11:56 PM
1

Not yet. The agoge is their end goal... Sparta was a matriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 09:04 AM
2

I mean in their youth they got primacy in a way as the first consideration of what society is/does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 01:07 AM
2

Feminism is the most anti-male thing ever! What about the agoge?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 01:05 AM
4

All of you here read this article and your conclusion is "feminism bad" You're an idiot if you think this. instead of "the right wing is taking advantage of feminism's failure in making men feel like part of the movement to rope young men into their hateful ideology"? Literally what 90% of us here believe, idiot. but it seems everybody wants to jerk off about how much they hate feminism instead of having actual discussions about how to make men's lives better. Projection. That's what you want it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 01:02 AM
9

I wouldn't say it did more harm than good. In fact socialists improved far more the conditions for women than the liberal movement (feminism is a toxic liberal movement for the female bourgeoisie and is therfore right wing movement (hi to AskFeminist)). Cuba is the only country that inducts as many women into power as men... and it doesn't do it through quotas. Women having been excelling at the top or their fields since 100 years in the former USSR, again, not due to quotas. I'm not a socialist…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 01:00 AM
4

If you want to see the future, picture a boot stamping on a human face, forever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:37 AM
20

Yeah the 'men are trash' all happened behind closed doors instead of the public square.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:36 AM
1

Interesting theory that runs counter to my own ... I'll take a look at that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:35 AM
2

I think the younger you go, the higher "price" you are paying for the search for equity Also the less transactionary it becomes because young men never experienced this privilege, while older men did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:34 AM
4

That's a good way to frame retributionary 'justice'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:33 AM
2

The problem of discussing this is that the people who believe the last thing to be fair think that they deserve it because the first one happened and still happens in some places It's the "I suffered so you must too" mindset, instead of "I suffered so no one should suffer again" They'll claim they're left wing when this is retributionary in a way that most conservatives balk at.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:32 AM
5

The word for that is 'supremacy'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:30 AM
12

Ethnic minority men are most likely to follow Tate... Oh gee, you mean the least privileged in society resent being told that they're privileged. Edit: compared with 12% among white men. Okay, that's better. I mean that's bad, but it's more in line with what I'd expect. He has been tweeting in Jamaican patois and declared that melanin, the skin pigment, “gives wisdom and insight, along with bravery and physical power”. That's definitely something in line with the theme of this article and certai…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:22 AM
10

Have you tried telling them how privileged they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 12:19 AM
8

Resting shit eating grin face
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/24 07:21 PM
-2

It's called corvee, and it's a form of taxation. Slavery is if you lose your personhood, not if you have a single duty. I suppose you'll say next that all forms of taxation are slavery too. Or that antizionism is antsemitism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 05:55 AM
0

If the idea that one can not force people to kill and die is extremist, than I am an extremist, a libertarian and whatever else you would like to call me. I kmow. You just said that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 05:53 AM
-1

Good diplomancy is the best defence. So djust to be clear you DONT have a solution, right? And you don't get it back, That doesn't sound like a viable defensive strategy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 05:14 AM
3

.it's always IMO that it's been an open secret that Women/Girls generally want the spoils of The Grind, but have no interest in actually grinding. Lets be real: most men don't want to either. The thing is we have to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 04:48 AM
1

Okay those numbers aren't too bad... well, they're bad, but not unworkable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 04:40 AM
0

I'm not libertarian in terms of economic libertarianism, but I'm a classic liberal and being libertarian in terms of individual... Oh well, that explains your extemist stances. human rights is not an insult to me. You may want to actually look up what human rights are, because they include collective rights. For example: a right to social order delineated in these documents Community Duties Essential to Free and Full Development And one thst you already know but forgot apparently a right to asse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 04:32 AM
-2

I'd have not listened to Boris Johnson and kept to the agreement with Russia, I said defend, not how you avoid the war. You need hundreds of thousands of soldiers. How do you get them. ...for the record I do agree with your diplomatic strategy, and I think they made a costly mistake. But I did not ask for your diplomatic strategy. After losing so many Soldiers in the Ukraine, Russia will not give back the territory now, it cost too much. So how do you get it back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 04:14 AM
-1

This subreddit, however, is leftwingmaleadvocates not leftwingstateadvocates Do you have another serious solution? How would you defend Ukraine instead? You can value your state's rights more than men's lives. I never said anything about a state's right. I don't even believe in such a thing. You can argue that the survival of a nation is worth offering the lives of young men. But I think it should be clear that it's not male advocacy. I never said it was. Because it isn't. Because male advocacy …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/24 09:59 AM
2

I think it's going to be better for everyone, let's be real. Women as a class aren't benefiting from the current affaires where you (not you personally) demand more from men than men have to give. Once the exchange starts flowing both ways and concessions can be given, then we can level out the inequities. But let's be frank, nothing that great is going to happen. If you want to see the future, picture a boot stamping on a human face, forever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/24 04:48 AM
4

I think that conscription is neccesary to support a state... but we should draft women too. No country will throw the lives of conscripted women away in useless wars... and if they tried it'd be a revolution before tea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/24 04:43 AM
3

look at it through the lens of narcissism. *Narcissistic personality disorder. I think it'd worth clarifying that you're talking about the actual disorder rather than the cliche.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/24 11:24 PM
2

Moreover, AI women could lead to men to the development of unhealthy and unrealistic expectations with dealing with women: AI would be designed to fit the man's total expectations, while a real women would necessitate that the man develops patience and communication skills. Without the conflicts and dialogue that a woman would bring to a man's life, an AI-seeking man would be far too socially maladjusted. Yeah, but the pressure of real men leaving the dating market will effect the real women in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/24 11:15 PM
6

It's not 'whataboutism' if it's relevant or, analogous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/24 10:53 PM
-6

But her going on with a list of "hideous men" is just wrong. Why did she have to put as "men?" I hate this, To be frank: I dont think this is not reasonable. Men are not women, as long as its not expressly sexist, which it can be, I don't care. I can only imagine how "My list of hideous women" would be met with and the controversy and outrage over that. And they'd be wrong. There are doubtless men throwing a fit about this because 'women should be demure/subservient/etc.,' and they're stupid too…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/24 01:29 AM
-3

But her going on with a list of "hideous men" is just wrong. Why did she have to put as "men?" I hate this, To be frank: I dont think this is not reasonable. Men are not women, as long as its not expressly sexist, which it can be, I don't care. I can only imagine how "My list of hideous women" would be met with and the controversy and outrage over that. And they'd be wrong. There are doubtless men throwing a fit about this because 'women should be demure/subservient/etc.,' and they're stupid too…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/24 01:29 AM
1

Or you don't know what you're talking about, and you're asking the wrong questions...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/24 11:35 PM
2

The word is 'pod', but in humans we usually use the term 'complex, social, creatures' because the term pod is too simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/24 10:10 PM
1

I'm confused why I'm basically being equated with him. You're not. I see nothing else mentioned about feminists supporting JP. Feminists don't support JP. Why would you think they do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/24 10:02 PM
2

We're not herd animals, a herd is a different social group. Herd animals leave members behind, for example. Humans are like elephants or whales, we don't leave each other behind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/24 09:58 PM
1

In the OP of this thread. Didn't you read it. Why didn't you read the first post before asking for something like this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/24 08:47 AM
3

Honestly I don't think it's horseshoe theory, I think it's they're both reactionaries, and feminism claims to be left wing when it's in fact centrist, and hence incorporates as much of the right as the left. When's the last time you heard a left agenda talking about grievances against any demographic, the history injustices, and the need to retribute against it? The answer is you haven't, because those are right wing framing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/24 05:28 AM
1

Let my people go!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/24 05:25 AM
1

Disney is pretty good at accidentally making pro-male allegorical content while thinking they're only making content supporting another group. Zootopia is supposed to be a racial allegory, but it works far better as a gender one. Race is sexualised too, which is probably why it keeps happening.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 08:02 PM
2

Being slightly above target BMI, which is itself a controversial measure, doesn't mean it's appropriate for a doctor to respond to every health problem with "lose weight", It is. You dont understand how important it is. The stories I've heard are actually that cartoonish. ... this isn't a cartoon, Bugs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 07:57 PM
0

Idk, it's nonsensical, self serviving, vague, Randian necromancy. That's liberal through and through.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 07:56 PM
1

Jesus Christ just ignore them. You can't convince someone this crazy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 06:31 PM
1

No one here talks about anything other than hating feminism. I don't even see left-wing political thoughts discussed. The point of this post is to stop the rightwing backlash; you're telling me that opposing the rightwing is a rightwing position? Because where I'm from, opposing the opposition of the right wing, reactionis, is right wing. Which is what you're doing. All the anti-woman/anti-feminism in here makes me think this sub is just a tradcon sub in disguise. Because you're ignoring everyth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 06:28 PM
1

The problem is how you define left and right. The difference is if you support a royal veto or if you don't support a royal veto... Which in other words: nof really relavant to almost anything in any country at any point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 06:24 PM
1

Sorry for the rant, it had to come out. I'm so fed up with this bullshit. Oh gee, so this is based on experience? How could I have known. socioeconomically Just economically. They're drowning in social capital... which is more important than economic capital.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 06:05 PM
2

Also more than anyone else period, isnt it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 06:02 PM
2

is the discrimination against gay men in hiring (particularly against gay white men) in LGBT community organizations. Really. Let me guess: male privilege. Because gay men just keep getting every fucking break, right. And a black gay male is a 4 dimensional hypergeometric entity that is simultaneous immasculine, hyper masculine, privileged, and oppressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 06:01 PM
3

but I do think there is a legitimate women's issue where it's common for doctors to tell women that their health problems are a result of their weight, Statistically speaking they are... weight affects EVERYTHING, so much so that what you're saying practically impossible. It needs to be cartoonishly bad to be wrong... And my doctor keeps yelling at me to lose weight. I'm a boy. And she's right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 05:58 PM
1

Its not only the "extreme" feminism, mainstream feminists also hold this view. Most feminists today are extreme. The term extreme does not refer to more or less feminist in this case, but rather to belief in extreme interpretations... for example: patriarcby is an extremist belief. It is very, very popular. This is related to why feminism is generally speaking less popular over time... although there has been a swelling of adherents following the Trump years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 05:48 PM
1

She might already be happy Yes, this is a great risk when interacting with any demographic of human: happiness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 05:41 PM
1

Not what herd means, Lambert.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 05:39 PM
5

Basically, a single man tries to meet women and struggles very much so when he shows interest. Yet the moment he's seen in the company of other women, then other girls are like 'he must not be a weirdo'. Because 'the patriarchy' is projection, women, particularly feminists, assume that there is some boys club in the same way that there is a womens club. There isn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 05:39 PM
13

, its ironic that feminists seem to agree with Peterson on this point despite supposedly being on opposite political sides. Is it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 05:37 PM
16

Hey, it's not like an Aryan would be usurous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/24 06:28 PM
1

And just like IRL the kkk was more popular in the north, against nonblacks: it was mostly against italians, Irish, and Germans. Nominally 'white people', with 'white privilege'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 10:06 PM
3

Interesting theories.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 10:03 PM
50

I wonder, what the current ideal of a man in the relationship and personality spheres is. He must be submissive, and subservient... and he will be viewed with contempt for his weakness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 09:05 PM
17

"Yeah butt men pay more emotional money than they give, and the emotional pay gap between men and women is over 2x
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 05:13 AM
6

If you dont like emotional work you should negotiat a better emotional contract with bettrr emotional pay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 05:11 AM
36

You can't suffer after dying. So if you ignore mortality, the morbity rate makes the value skewed. Morbity is a technical term btw.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 06:12 PM
2

Technically true.... technically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 06:10 PM
4

Yeah, but add 200 years to both of them, and put them at the centre of the earth, and they're liche priest molement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 02:15 PM
-4

Subtract 40 years each So make it a blowjob? place them in a public park Are you seriously saying warp space and time? Okay: Move 4.2 lightyears to Alpha Centari, 1000 years into the future, and tell me that its the present day on Earth, Sid Meier.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 02:13 PM
7

Neither of those are love.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 02:10 PM
1

They act like as if half of the website is either open or hidden incels In pretty sure they think this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 07:37 PM
4

You can't be a man and think like a woman, that' makes you a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/23 03:56 AM
10

Why though. Feminists are just going to say it doesn't exist. Or it doesn't count. Or they have a good reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/23 03:51 AM
1

I agree, but the point is that this is formal recognition of the issue facing males. We can transform the reaction easier than if we had to convince them it were a problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 11:32 AM
5

Believe all men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 11:28 AM
7

"if you did nothing you have nothing to be afraid of" Literally, LITERALLY a Goebbels quote, Fraulein.... also a Dick Cheney quote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 11:26 AM
1

False accusations are 2% as much as they are 70%. We dont know how many of the failed cases are false, we just know that they failed. We know the 2% are provably false, and we know the 30% are provably true. That's it. The number is probably the same as other crimes: 10-40%.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 11:23 AM
2

Why only men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 10:30 AM
-1

I really love this kind of leftism. Let's destroy hundreds and thousands of peoples lives in order to bring us 0.00001 inch nearer to the utopian higher cause! You know my argument is kill less people, right. Most countries aren't strong enough to attack other countries. And those who are, don't give a shit about whom they are sending to fight and what do their societies think about it. They do it the Russian way - prohibit even calling the war "war" and put in jail all who would even dare to th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 10:29 AM
2

Lets read the study again: In this pre-registered study, we aimed at replicating and extending previous empirical evidence for the DEVP by examining the associations of pathological narcissism with involvement in feminist activism. Whoops, definitely about feminist activism. You should hace read at least two sentences in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/23 09:50 AM
1

Nope: By examining the associations of pathological narcissism with involvement in feminist activism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/23 09:49 AM
3

Mostly because the study is question talks about activism in general Really. Lets take a look at this articles descripition by its author: In this pre-registered study, we aimed at replicating and extending previous empirical evidence for the DEVP by examining the associations of pathological narcissism with involvement in feminist activism. Nope, definitely about feminist activism. Maybe you should read slower. Much slower.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/23 09:48 AM
-12

I think we should not abolish the draft. The key to neoliberalism was to start with draft removal, to make forever wars possible. Wars where everyone is at risk of being draft makes long stupid wars impossible. I'm not opposed to removing the draft, ideally, but the time when I trust the electorate and industry to make the right call is not now. We should expand the draft to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/23 09:43 AM
1

My experience is that people who do will be either absolutely sexist far right wingers, who will immediately make everyone on the left oppose the issue just because they are supporting it because they will mix it up with like 8 different repulsive things they do. Thats considerable, but the thing is that is true we need to find ways to minimise their impact, convert them, and or weaponise them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:57 AM
2

Power concedes nothing without demand. So we must demand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:54 AM
1

And the best way to do that is to make a voting guide for men. I'm not trying to discourage you from this guide, but I disagree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:53 AM
1

Both. You use what you have, and we have both. The question is: what do you have?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:50 AM
1

I think we need a tactical doctrine before a voting guide. The very notion of supporting mens rights undermines support for candidates, which means that targeting our endorsements is attacking our own goals... Which is not to say I think we don't need this, because we do, but I think we need more fundemental frame works first. Also we need better goals than those listed, those are peripheral problems men face, IMHO. No offense. That's perfectly fine way to get the ball rolling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:49 AM
5

Men-bashing is quite normal in day by day life. People see it as inoffensive. Even men are blind to it. More dexual harassment is target at men online, but men literally report a lower rate of it by rations... and the people complaining about womens harassment don't think twice about calling any man 'incel'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:44 AM
2

It's ugly to say it, but that's how it is: I would feel much more empathetic and attentive to women's issues, if those same people asking for our empathy wouldn't regularly scoff at our request for the same level of support and care. You're undermining the argument; we dont need as much support as women do, we need far less, and yet they still won't give it to us. They're so envious that even attentiono is unacceptable. Complicated and vsst support system to ensure women don't slide into poverty…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:35 AM
4

while we push the misogynistic men off further and further into the depths of their own isolated communities, This is the biggest problem imho. Both groups should be shunned, but one is ignored and accepted, and the other is vilified and used as qualification for the other. If both were marginalised we could work together to fix societies problems, and reduce their numbers by reducing the causes of their subculture. but those men still tear their ugly heads up in enough places where you have to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:32 AM
3

There's a reason why 90% of the laws governing sexuality restrict women rather than men, and it's not because of 'patriarchy'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:25 AM
1

I literally just wrote that in response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:24 AM
1

Eggsackedly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:23 AM
1

It's perfectly fine, and necessary to the scientific process. It's called 'hopytgesis', and the alternative would be letting your ego retroactively decide you expected something else. "Based on traditional cosmological ideologies, we would expect the sun to revolve around the Earth" But, like, they did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:23 AM
1

It's a fucking lie that oniy the desperate resort to. If they had a reason, any reason, they would use it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:20 AM
2

Try using that as an excuse for literally anything that men do, ever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:18 AM
1

No, it's not about power. I didn't invent Greek.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 04:32 PM
1

Really. Google it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 04:32 PM
1

Feminism is an expression of liberalism, which is the definitive centrist ideology. No form of feminism rejects centering women as the core of the ideology. That would make it not feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 08:18 AM
1

in fact, the USSR was the first country to enroll abortion rights. The country with forced sterilisation and abortions? That's not what rights means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 06:14 AM
1

No, Patriarchy is simply about male characteristics being valued more than "women" characteristics. Might want to refresh your Greek, Iurgos. Patriarchy means rule by the fathers. Oligarchy doesn't mean the oligarchs are the most valued, it means the oligarchs rule. It's about power, not value.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 06:08 AM
0

Marxist liberalism isn't a thing. Feminism is a centrist ideology, and it is in opposition to marxism. 'Intersectionality' is stretching the ideology, let alone Marxism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 06:02 AM
1

which pretty much exposes Feminism for the Fundementalism. When someone does not read their own propaganda and demands that everything should return to proper Muslim/Christian/libertarian/feminist values it's fundementalis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 06:00 AM
7

The number of times I've read if he had an errction he wanted it.... Dead men can get an erection, btw. You're not so sexy zombies want you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 02:18 AM
5

How do you know you're really answering as yourself in this comment. How do you know what knowledge is. Can grass think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 02:17 AM
2

Lol of course it would be. It's so stupid I never even rthought about it long enough to see this. ...Dominance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 02:16 AM
4

Driving well is not the same as being a rapist. I think you can judge your propensity to rape rather well, Sigwald.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 02:14 AM
7

That's prolife propaganda. They want to say that a distinction can be made between rape and consentual sex, dont give that to them because there will not be one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 02:12 AM
2

I know, right? It's bad enough to be disappointing in bed, who would want to be TRAUMATIC in bed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 02:10 AM
1

I dont get it, where are all the balanced, educated, emotionally healthy men for me to date? Also /#menareallscum /#smashthepatrionomy /#mensrightsarebad /#menhavenoproblems
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/23 09:30 AM
1

Yeah, that's pretty hilarious. By which I mean I find it diverting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/23 09:27 AM
1

True.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/23 09:26 AM
1

I mean you have men going their own way banned on several forums here on Reddit and cannot be discussed. I think that is more supportive of my point than not: why do they ban them? Lies and propaganda about how they're misogynists that hate women. They get lumped in with incels and misogynists that want to surpress women's rights. They are not banned because they can't into pussy. When you see rhetoric talking about how women are having a hard time finding "good partners," and other things like …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/23 09:23 AM
3

Probably proof women are better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/23 10:23 AM
4

Is it? I can only recall the feminist 'I don't need no man' cliche.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/23 10:22 AM
4

I agree. I'd point out that their adoption if women of colour is entirely superficial though as well, hence: black feminism. There was a post a few weeks ago that i dont know if you saw, but it was talking about black women, in the afro community lamenting the 'weakness' of their men, and how black people 'had been dominated by every culture' expressly by the failure of blakc men to protect black women... like a bizarro world version of white feminists blaming white men for the exploitation of t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/23 08:33 AM
7

There's certainly a sense in which it's real, in that most people in the upper echelons of power are male Only if you consider institutions dominated by men, ands ignore the other institutions society is based on... and this reasoning ignores the breadth of institutions, which are always more egalitarian, and frequently female dominated. Also leadership by men does not make something patriarchal. A democracy is led by a president or syndic or whatever, that doesn't make it a dictatorship, power …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/23 09:29 AM
7

The problem tho is that it's mostly lip service. Is it? Or are they not even voicing opposition, and using the implicite threat still. It's like the southern strategy: You start out in 1954 by saying, “N word, n word, word” By 1968 you can’t say “n word”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic thin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/23 09:20 AM
13

Yeah, women were literally more than half of society, often MUCH MORE yet they claim they had no impact on this 'patriarchy'... until there is something to take credit for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/23 06:07 AM
15

They stopped using black men as bogeymen the second it became unPC, and now act like they weren't the main perpetrators of that racist meme the whole time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/23 06:05 AM
1

where the message wasn't even meant as a joke but sincerely in its subjugation Not what fantasy is, Ariel. Or do you think Star Wars is an apologia for war crimes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 11:34 PM
1

Thank you for getting my point that the people reacting on this post is comparable and equivalent to feminists. Your point was not to affirm your argument, but to undermine it?? I think you've had enough schnapps, Daneboy. I'm glad you understood what my 'hilariously ironic' statement on my initial comment was refering to Well someone has to, if apparently you don't understand your own point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 11:28 PM
1

Yeah, I've been there. I didnt get diagnosed until I was 23 though, so my school career was long over.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 05:24 PM
2

Twilight and Fifty Shades of Grey aren't satire, meaning they are sincere in their messages, which is far more sinister. Good point, you chose an entirely different medium, with an entirely different message, with an entirely different tone, with an entirely different intent, for an entirely different audience. Well, I guess I can start linking recipes to ypu to disprove your point. Or how about some Yoko Ono art. Wait, or how about farming impliments from 1900 Russian occupied Polish farms. Tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 06:37 AM
1

Exactly, they weren't satire. Then it's not a good comparison for satire, is it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 06:34 AM
1

How did you reach the conclusion that twilight snd fifty shades are ironic, or that I was implying that? Because that's the only way your example works. And it isnt, so it doesn't. Are you so dumb that you think satire is serious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 06:31 AM
1

I showed you movies, books and franchises. You didn't. 2 Those are not the comparable. Show us the same thing. Are you dumb enough to think the fact it's a commercial makes the media so different from the others? Are you dumb enough to think that choosing a dissimilar product to make an comparison is a wise choice? And are you dumb enough to say that the counter examples are legion, and then fail to produce one, and say that your ersatz example that is not even analogous, and fails to even produ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 06:29 AM
16

Fact: half of people with ADD dont graduate high school. Facter: people with ADD have HIGHER than average IQs, even considering this. Factest: males are more likely to be diagnosed with ADD.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 02:02 AM
23

Because they really want to view it as a fault of individual “bad” men. So they're more conservative than conservative men on this issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 01:49 AM
45

Ironically despite their claim that patriarchy is founded on men supressi g emotions, so they need to say how they feel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 01:48 AM
30

You didn't even mention the category of, 'it's a problem, but only because men will lash out violently and kill women.. more men than women, but IDC smash the patrionomy'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 01:47 AM
2

Edit: not responding to the material criticism, general presumption, and unqualified dismissal? Rather uncouth. It seems some people just cannot behave appropriately. What are the odds that someone so conspicuously on behaviour would himself be so unrefined. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BqWbCYKIAAA8IHl.jpg:large You see, this would be an example, if it said 'this is how women must be dealt with, they have no place in society' in the caption, but it doesn't so it's. Manners maketh the man. Though …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 11:42 PM
2

https://twitter.com/JoachimHesse/status/1185462862371807232/photo/1 Are you seriously comparing debased humiliation with heterosexual sex in the missionary position? Are you a pervert, or a liar. I'm done here, your examples are a joke, and you should feel embarassed to have stooped to this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 11:36 PM
1

https://youtu.be/5fcid8H3bbo?si=R179x1diYjDKU5WA Don't try and tell me this was well recieved by feminists, are you fucking joking? And that's not a real ad, its a parody of a real ad. Your literally devaluing your own argument with these. You just showed me a star wars movie to prove that the moon landing didn't happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 11:34 PM
2

https://cdn.sanity.io/images/vxy259ii/production/199933c3e8315fd3f5eb9f149ca8e6091b3f121f-660x440.jpg?w=1296&q=80&auto=format That's from the middle of the last century. When women couldnt own a credit card. You could as well say tuberculosis is a proble.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 11:32 PM
2

https://images.ecestaticos.com/-4pR1bs_wewV5RUY2gnkkvroH5s=/0x0:468x604/1200x1200/filters:fill(white):format(jpg)/f.elconfidencial.com%2Foriginal%2F0c4%2F6c5%2Fe80%2F0c46c5e80b4a331ff25b751eb3299820.jpg:format(jpg)/f.elconfidencial.com%2Foriginal%2F0c4%2F6c5%2Fe80%2F0c46c5e80b4a331ff25b751eb3299820.jpg) Theres a million reasons why that's not sexist... youd have apoint if the burger were eating a women, which would make her less than a consumable, but phallic imagery=domination? What if I like g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 11:30 PM
1

If I understand the age group, then I have a frame of reference for OP. That would be reasonable. If we were talking about digferent time periods, which we're not, so it's unacceptable. They are either too young to remember, or are not paying attention. Literally no one who exists is too young to exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 11:27 PM
3

Because centre of the fucking universe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 05:05 PM
2

"An ad that shows two consenting adults is exactly the same as the murder of six million jews!". The comparison is the principle, not the extremity... although what made them both possible was assertively similar dehumanisarion. Dude, seriously, what the fuck. You are the reason why people ridicule male advocacy. Strawmen? I agree. You are the reason why people ridicule male advocacy. Idiot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 04:23 PM
7

Lesbians are sexually assaulted, yes that is true but gay men are beaten and even killed. Are there any laws against scissoring? Because I know laws against sodomy that carry the death penalty, for BOTH participants. Oh wait, that's proof that were trying to suppress women's sexuality, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:54 AM
2

It's a joke script appealing to the Femdom crowd. I'm not appealed to, dont speak for me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:51 AM
0

So you'd defend the Iraq war, for example. Or the holocaust. Because people don't take the cultural context all the anti arab, and antisemitic context. Sure German was wrong, but a lot of people aren't taking into account how much they hated Jews.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:51 AM
3

And please, we see the reverse all the time. Do you have any idea how much money 50 shades made? Not a commercial Not satire Not in the media A product Not consumed in public What the hell is wrong with you that you think this could possibly be a suitable example of the opposite. Didn't you think about this for a single second? You might as well say Colgate is a counter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:48 AM
2

Sex sells It's not sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:45 AM
3

Humiliation is part of the fetish. So's voreraphilia, but you don't see that in your paper.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:44 AM
1

I have a cum swallowing fetish, show me an example of that in mainstream media. How about shit eating. Or are there standards about what is acceptable on certain media?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:43 AM
6

You know, it's funny how there are at least five people who've made five posts about how obvious this is, yet they haven't provided an example of how obvious it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:42 AM
2

Might I ask No, just give us a suitable example of him being wrong, and stow the rhetorical question. This is something that can be objectively proven, so do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:40 AM
2

It's not a joke. You missed the entire point of this post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:39 AM
1

But do you condemn Hamas. I mean violence against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:35 AM
1

Like the whole Fifty Shades of Grey aspect? (A movie series which made over a billion dollars with the books selling almost 50 million copies) By women, for women. Entirely incomparable. Also not satire, can you even read?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:33 AM
1

Being tounge in cheek about a femdom fetish is far more innocent than romanticized abuse, so people on this post clutching their pearls and pretending it's a one-sided occurrence really need to look a bit wider at the media landscape. You want to show us a single example of the reverse being lauded as a great commercial. There is no shortage of commercials, all we deal with is advertisements in this life. So show us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:32 AM
1

And yet made several billion dollars, so let's not pretend that this commercial is somehow a new phenomenon or that it's never been done against women. If there's one thing we can agree on in the left it's that the market is an entirely moral arbiter of what is right. And yet made several billion dollars From almost exclusively women who were clamouring for it. This is only relevant if it's a male fantasy of curb stomping women, and the mean reaction from feminists is 'yeah, lol, wreck those who…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:29 AM
1

I lived through the hight of both Twilight and the Fifty Shades of Grey Era. Those were ironic? Are women really so stupid they were serious? And they liked it? I'm going to have to see proof. I've seen the reaction when the media is similarly degrading (in way worse ways) to women. Show us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:25 AM
2

Just a rather unfunny joke. Is not a joke, that's why it's not funny. It's a dog whistle. The same thing as when racists share an antiblack meme, and say 'it's just a joke lol the left can't meme'. You don't see it because you are sane. You need to watch their actions to know what they mean.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:24 AM
1

What does this have to do with the misandry you see online? If you think the ad is some kind of man-hating feminist fantasy of what they REALLY want to do to men in the future you have become hysterical, and need to focus on other things. How high are you that you think that they catterwaul all day about the literal meanings of absurdly misinterpreted... everything, and then when they do the same thing they claim means bigotry, you think they're actually just joking. Their interpretations of inn…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:17 AM
2

But isn’t this commercial a satirical play... It's not. the “objectification” trope in previous alcohol commercials? I thought you just said it was satire. If you believe that objectification is real then this isn't satire, it's either serious or it's not, it cant be both ironic, and literal at the same time. It can only be satire if its not really a commercial, which it is, so it's not. You know how fascists share racist memes and propaganda, and when caught say 'its just satire, its just a mem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:10 AM
4

but we're never going to get to a place of either denouncing feminism or calls for women to check their privelige/be better etc. Maybe white women. Maybe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:02 AM
5

I know, right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 06:01 AM
1

This isnt what a toxin is, that's venomous masculinity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/23 10:52 PM
1

women who don't want to lose their current social position, hoping to reach the level of domination as the men up top. But not at the cost of suffering the same risk of males, where 1% enjoy the benefits 99% create, feminists want the base level to be the relative privilege of feminity, with that maximal opportunity of masculinity, at no risk of the destitution men face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/23 10:51 PM
4

even though they have a higher likely hood of dying due to being drafted Or murdered. Or being collateral damage. Or being taken prisoner.... I don't entirely oppose the draft though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/23 10:43 PM
2

dominance culture DOMINATE THE WEAK
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/23 10:41 PM
13

I'm sure they do, because its a bologna term that they made up to retroactively take credit for something that isn't even a consideration in reality. Emotional labour. What about my intelligence finance. Or my consideration farming. Or nutrition ventures.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/23 10:29 PM
11

Since we know not all Misandry is Feminism, quite a lot of it isn't actually, why can't some of Feminism be anti-Misandry? It can, it's just so inconsequential, and so violently opposed within the movement that it's not worth mentioning. Like 'flat earth pagan goddess feminism'; we know it exists, but it's not the topic of any reasonable discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 11:57 AM
1

Jesus Christ. Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 08:54 PM
1

I affirm his recommendations... just tune out Emma Vigeland though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 08:01 AM
1

In Quebec, QS, the left most one, declared that for the upcoming mid-term only women and non-binary people can apply to run for them. Youve got to be kidding... please tell me you're joking. Also I want to see this, if you could show me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 07:46 AM
1

If I wver did that I'd write 'suck my balls' instead, but I guess your way is fine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 07:44 AM
1

Job? No, this is being the subject of a reeducation camp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 07:39 AM
1

Yeah, macroaggressions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 07:38 AM
12

Majority, even.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 07:35 AM
12

ninja stars Shuriken I'm deploying my boomerang. Krikey.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 07:33 AM
1

So women don't actually support each other as much as they say they do BUT They don't? I thought in group bias for women was high.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 07:31 AM
10

They support feminism No we dont. Feminism is a centrist ideology. It's in direct conflict with far left theories of class struggle. With all due respect: you've been brainwashed, ironically by the same people you seem to oppose. They assume we are the problem, that we all rape and harass and abuse ‘innocent women’ and it is disgusting to me. Those are conservative positions. I think you're making the common mistake of thinking men=rightwing and women=leftwing. Policies are not sexed. Policies a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/23 09:04 AM
2

Bobby Sherman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/23 01:36 AM
4

Hilariously societies with crazy low numbers of men are still led by men... Maybe that's atipping point, but it's gotta be pretty low.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/23 01:36 AM
1

Hurdur, right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 11:44 PM
1

However, as we all know, governments generally wants to have their cake and eat it too with regards to everything so in case where a women wants a baby but a men don’t, the only way for that women to live a financially stable and flourishing lifestyle is at the expense of the men. Your first point is more correct than you indicate here: this is NOT the only option, a proper welfare system that makes sure that mothers cannot fall below the poverty line if they choose to have a child is the proper…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 08:07 AM
5

Oh geez what a twist. I thought it was because penis go in vagina and that's violent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 07:56 AM
1

What's LWMA?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 07:47 AM
2

Yes, which is why we must force them to attack us in ways that make them look bad, while minimising the opportunities for them to attack us in ways that make them look good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 07:47 AM
3

For example, others will find it much easier to defend "feminism" than "discrimination," "misandry," "anti-male bias," or, say, "violations of due process." And when they try and strawamn you, you can respond with, 'I said, 'manhating', why do you associate feminism with hatred of men?' 'I said people who hate men, why do you say you feel attacked when I talk about people who hate men?'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 07:45 AM
1

Lol @ title
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/23 10:02 PM
6

Its not Prussian morality though. They expectation of men to be hard workers and providers is recorded throughout all of human history and spans all societies and cultures. He's referring to the absurd robotic, inhuman degree that the Prussians took this practice to. Even a wealthy man who did nothing to expand his wealth and choose to enjoy it would be shamed and have jokes made at his expense even if it was behind his back if he was someone with power and influence. Not true for most of histor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/23 04:00 AM
2

prussian It's protestant. And yes, it's a corrupted issue of adherance to traditions that have outlasted their usefulness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/23 03:55 AM
1

if a woman finds you attractive, they'll make it known... woman... make it it known... Lol. No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/23 09:53 PM
1

Interesting. It would explain their simulatneously held invalidly opposed positions of extreme female sexual expression, and extreme masculine inexpression
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/23 09:45 PM
16

hence the "it's a shame he's gay" thing. That's literally hate, not love. You know shame is bad, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/23 04:11 AM
13

even existing Literally. Manspreading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/23 04:10 AM
34

Agreed. I'm tired of this gynocentric egotism that says everything is sexism. Sayinh women are feminine? Misogyny. Saying women are masculine? Misogyny. Saying men are masculine? Misogyny. Saying men are effete? Misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/23 04:09 AM
2

Sincerely hope not one of them lands on their feet. Can't harpies fly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 08:00 AM
8

I will also note that the FDS and TwoX subreddits were not fans (so enemy of my enemy is my friend?). So are incels and fascists, that doesn't mean you share anything with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 08:00 AM
6

Yeah. Also segregationists said the same things, with the same programmes frequently, that doesn't make them 'left wing', just because they think 'colours will do better in their own societies' Left wing means soding with the vulnerable, not siding with the whites, blacks, women, trans, or orcs. Whoever needs help in a given situation should get it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 07:58 AM
1

But this tripe is why we're here in the first place. If it were any good, we wouldn't need male advocates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 07:55 AM
3

...how did you get that exactly? What does either new media or old media have to do with traditionalism, and how is either an endorsment of it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 07:53 AM
4

Well said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 07:52 AM
2

More likely their boomer brained, lack of talent writers have finally ran out of ways to make this offensive materiel marketable, and are making way for other, younger harpied.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 07:51 AM
1

On the offchance you don't examine the threads of askfeminists on this board, here's a quick snapshot: >https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/si6qpa/looks_like_we_are_being_discussed_on_raskfeminists/ ​ Let's take a look at the views of askfeminists: >They're not particularly left but they sure are male Top reply. You expect us to take this comment as a serious validation of our shared interests? >There's a lot of whataboutism. It's like white people saying "we deserve to be lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/23 11:13 AM
1

In reply to both this comment and the other, I think that the askfeminists subreddit would be informative for you. I got banned from that reddit. For saying racial segregation was bad. I would love to have a conversation about the commonalities between feminism and left wing male advocacy, because done right, most goals are common ones. We’re all protesting the gender roles that, for instance, force men to be providers and women to be parents instead of giving men resources to be good fathers an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/23 10:51 AM
1

Among lesbians it’s 75% Wow. Hilarious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/23 10:01 AM
-4

There’s nothing inherently wrong with that if it’s the case It's never the case, we live in a society, and even if it's not a patriarchy that doesn't make it a matriarchy. We're all resounding for society, men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 09:20 PM
9

Also divorce. The procedure of separation entirely favours women, which is fine if the procedure protects men from excessive loss, like alienation from their children, but it doesn't. But is it really blindness? I doubt that if they learn of this that they will act on it, because their goal isn't to protect women, but maintain their oligarchy control on gender discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 07:35 PM
36

so far the argument is that DV shelters and no-fault divorce gave women alternatives to killing their partners to escape abuse, and that the rate of wives/girlfriends dying hasn’t changed because unlike women, men primarily kill to control/dominate. Bad thing happens to women=patriarchy Bad thing happens to men=patriarchy My first thought is that it's likely relavted to how women were liberated from their gender roles, but men were not. If you remove the obligation to 'be a man' as the only solu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 12:25 AM
11

Those who will suffer most are those with the least to answer for, and those who held the least power. Only the marginalised will suffer any meaningful loses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/23 08:20 PM
5

'Rape culture', 'male privilege', and 'patriarchy' are mainstream feminist beliefs. The fringes are not the problem with feminism, feminists with reasonable views are the fringe of the movement. Go to any feminist sub, and search for the number of times that 'not all men' as a term is complained about, and then compare the number of times where it is used as a defence against sexist statements about the male gender. Feminism is a hate movement. People who argue that there are no civilian targets…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/23 07:32 AM
3

I’m a feminist So you can't be biased because of and despite the fact that it will end No, it begins with it, and the fact you say it is the ends result is either a lie or a delusion. Feminism is at a stall because you don't understand that I’m literally arguing for a world where I not only have to keep my house clean and running smoothly, but work for the income to sustain it. Where I actively advocate to dates to go 50/50 instead of them paying. You oppose modern feminism then. They oppse both…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/23 07:24 AM
1

Apparently, we expect men to have the maturity of a 40 year old as soon as they hit 18, with zero tolerance for men's youthful indiscretions More like at 14.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/23 07:13 AM
1

If you want to see the future picture a boot stamping on a human face, forever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/23 07:11 AM
12

Which I agree, there are double standards and differences in dating lives, but feminists agree with these tenants too, attributing these to creations of the patriarchy. That's great, but what do they DO about these problems? And I don't mean attacking the problem in an indirect way that according to their ideology will eventually result in the intended effect, but actually doing something about it it. In other words: what do they do about male suicide? Nothing. In fact they blame men for it. If …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 09:07 AM
2

Does it cover technology as well as science? Because if it does, that's probably it. Or she slept with someone important. Edit: it covers technology. But I'm not ruling out the prostitution theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/23 09:53 PM
3

Avatar rapes... But avatar mass murder and enslavement are fine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/23 09:49 PM
2

Ive unironically seen Asian feminists say this exact logic to not date Asian men because of "Patriarchy" in the Asian community, and of course white women do this to white men, cause the social capital right now is hating all men, especially white cis men, and blaming them for all of societies problems. Wow. Such surprise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/23 06:15 AM
7

I suppose it's too much to ask that black women support them. Do the feminists of any race stand by their men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/23 08:10 AM
6

But here is to address a broader point i want to make in a social sense, why does no one talk about the divest black women space on the internet? Like seriously, these women will say some shit like this "Black men are the most conquered race of males on this planet", "Black men are the least masculine men on the planet" and other bullshit points that are objectively anti black Victim blaming horseshit... also literally what the most racist white people say: 'they deserved conquest', 'it's the na…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/23 08:07 AM
77

Let me guess: they're hating on boys because they are male and are oppressing women for 10,000 years, despite the fact they are 10 years old.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/23 07:52 AM
1

And if you think about it,wen are seen as sexuallypure. Until they have sex with a man, which makes her impure. That also plays into slut shaming. Oh right, that implies men are the impurity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/23 08:17 AM
1

You're the one talking about ejecting someone into the sun, I'm literally NOT talking about that... Trolling it seems. That sounds like projection to me, I'm done, good bye.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/23 12:21 AM
1

I cant, I have too much botox.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/23 12:03 AM
0

You're saying he shouldn't. That's just a misrepresentation of fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/23 12:01 AM
1

When you haven't explained your position adequately... No one asked for my position, if you want to know what I think you need to ask. And you didn't answer my question, which was NOT sarcastic: what did you expect if not suspension? I want to know. That's a serious amount of downvotes, do people not bother to read what the actual discussion is in here anymore? Maybe they find your answers so poor that they don't think it adds to the conservation. That's what the downvote system is for. I'm awar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/23 12:01 AM
1

We're not here for that red pill thing then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 06:46 PM
2

I can figure out a lot of things, but I'd like you to explain what you mean.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 06:09 PM
3

Innocence until proven guilty is a thing, Mao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 06:05 PM
1

Again: use the spacebar.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 06:05 PM
2

Red herring. And insulting. How about you improve your attitude before insisting anyone else is 'resentful.' Resentment in the literal sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:26 AM
4

I prefer freedom to justice. That's like prefering water to air. Try to breathe water.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:21 AM
2

Your warped understanding of what de Beauvoir meant by that statement in the context of her larger argument about social sex roles almost 100 years ago, and the fact that you do not recognize that de Beauvoir, along with Sartre, should be welcome reading for a left-wing perspective on men’s liberation rather than a scapegoated feminazi enemy makes me realize how much of an echo-chamber-hivemindecho-chamber-hivemind this place is. Jesus christ, hit the fucking return key, it's free. And that sent…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:17 AM
6

I'm so sorry, we tend to forget that men aren't allowed to be bitter or angry! I literally didn't notice that. Because I'm numb to people telling men not to have emotions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:10 AM
9

It's so angry and bitter, Tone policing. You don't have a right to determine what emotions other people have. If you think this space is too angry or bitter pour on your own saccharine. and many of the talking points ('muh feminism') are indistinguishable from the right... Literally a fallacious argument. Just because they share views does not make this views wrong. Conversatives share a lot of views with feminists, like how women need to be protected from men, rapacious male behaviour is rampan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:09 AM
3

Is this basically red-pill that votes Bernie? What does that even mean?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:04 AM
6

If he doesn't want to go back that's up to him, he should have the choice though. Your first post is at odds with this statement. The problem with him not having a chance to defend himself is ejection; that's the threat school can enact, did you think they were going to launch him into the sun, put him in the pillory?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:03 AM
10

If after then it would seem reasonable, It is literally, legally, and factually unreasonable. I don't know what you think unreasonable means, but it means not based on reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 07:57 AM
7

To be fair though: I thought this was real too all my life, and only found out a few years ago that it was a myth. But fortunately: it's not a real thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 05:11 PM
1

I was calling you Skynet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 06:20 AM
1

Yutani forced-bought Weyland You mean a hostile takeover? They should have reached a post-scarcity world long before Yutani had the powers to do that, imo. A world making this take over moot. I don't understand these statements. Also read The Culture books. It's on my list. I'm also good with Foundation That's on my list too. I rather have a benevolent unkillable uncorruptable leader, than thousands of small corrupt greedy leaders (successively, even if they all had dominion over the entire plan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 06:18 AM
16

It's well known a a debunked myth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 06:09 AM
37

Okay: On March 13, 1964, 28-year-old bartender Catherine "Kitty" Genovese was stabbed, sexually assaulted, and murdered while walking home from work at 3 a.m. in Queens, New York.[39] The case is widely known for originally stimulating social psychological research into the "bystander effect". According to a sensationalized article in The New York Times, 38 witnesses watched the stabbings but did not intervene or even call the police until after the attacker fled and Genovese had died.[ Ah, so i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 06:08 AM
-9

He also presents a lot of solutions that are just “make it easier for men to fulfill their traditional gender role.” Yeah, bur that will solve almost all of the problems, and then fixing the remaining issues become much more feasible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 06:03 AM
2

I'm actually not sure the person you were talking to was being intentionally manipulative;... I did not mean to imply that you did. I'm just saying I think they're crazy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 09:51 PM
3

I read your reply about them being an extremist organization No you didn't. Because I didn't call them 'extremists'... in fact I didnt call them extreme at all... I said that they have an extreme institutional bias... btw that's one of the first points of media literacy: identify the biases of your author. In other words: they are the least reliable source you could use, and you should use almost anything else... they are not going to declare a 'Fatwa', Mujahideen. Maybe you should reading again…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 09:49 PM
4

an organization dedicated to helping those facing domestic violence is troubling That's not what it is. Didn't you read my reply? and sounds a lot more red-pilly than I thought this crowd would be. It's called 'media literacy'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 08:15 PM
6

I'm 90% sure he's deluded. This is such a poor attempt to manipulate us that it cannot be concious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 08:06 PM
6

I thought it wasn't a competition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 04:13 PM
2

Yes, Lord Vader.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:41 PM
1

>Feminists claim "they don't mean men" when they say patriarchy, but that's plainly a lie. ​ Some don't. Some.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:20 AM
5

They sound like 15 year olds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:18 AM
1

>For some reason it really hurt. I'm going to assume this is ironic, and you are aware of the obvious reasons why it hurt. ​ >I fully believe that the patriarchy is real and a problem. ​ The first rule of an authoritarian society is that one may not criticise it. Unless they were dragged into a van, beated, forced to apologise on public TV, and sent to re-education there is no patriarchy. That's what happens in a patriarchy. ​ >I dunno, I’m all for burning down the patriarchy until the women I t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:15 AM
6

People hate I'm of the brave opinion that hate is bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:04 AM
7

Why are there incels, is the question, please focus. ​ As someone with low literacy you should appreciate this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:02 AM
11

Since ableism is considered politically incorrect by the left Since express ableism. Implicit is fine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:00 AM
9

It's basically the disability version of the dog whistle. >You start out in 1954 by saying, “N-word, N-word, N-word.” By 1968 you can’t say “N-word”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abs…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 01:59 AM
10

Because whom is targeted has less to do with culpability, and more to do with who cannot fight back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 01:52 AM
11

I get you, it isn't a competition, and male sexual assault is an issue. I like how this is your first sentence, and this is your last: >...I don't think they are all the same severity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 12:42 AM
6

By what standard? The one you see if you keep reading his post... why did you stop there, and take it out of context; you can make anything wrong by taking it out of context, watch this: >you may... discounting women... Fear... Fear... Fear... Stalk... Stalk... Stalk... Women... Oh so you want women to be stalked and fear us? That's not progressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 12:40 AM
8

>If you feel it is wrong then you should reach out to NISVS. Why, it's clearly an extremely biased organisation. Didn't you read the name? Also the express purpose of this reddit is in opposition to organisations like this and their perceived bias. Didn't you read anything here? The last place you should use as proof is what you just listed, we're at war with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 12:37 AM
6

To be fair I now view your positions as much more reasonable by contrast with Skynet over here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:49 AM
5

sterilise humans Are you an AI.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:48 AM
5

I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:45 AM
6

Neutral, sentient, advanced AI, that can't be corrupted. Yes, like the corporation. Weyland-Yutani, or Cyberdyne systems. HAL did nothing wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:44 AM
15

Socialism requires centralised distributive power. Given psychopaths and sociopaths exist, that dynamic is naturally going to end up with authoritarianism. Literally the opposite is true. You think having fewer checks on power, and more unaccountability will empower the individual? What about Somalia, and every other failed state ever? Why didn't they uniformly resort in libertarian paradises?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:42 AM
22

You seem vastly out of touch with what left means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:40 AM
18

Those are liberal policies. If you support those then you are in this policy space liberal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:39 AM
8

rather than change for the sake of change. The only people who want that are cultists of Tzeentch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:38 AM
27

People being responsible and held equally accountable for their own actions. Communities helping those who need help. Valuing family, trust and honourable behaviour. Those aren't policy choices. You're not going to go into any marxist board and find them saying they oppose community, and reward treachery/dishonour, that's the decepticons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:36 AM
31

why aren’t you conservative? 'Men' are not a conservative policy choice, and women are not a liberal policy choice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 06:34 AM
3

Is that the default cultural stance though? I think those are all countercultural phenomena.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 03:01 AM
3

I think "men" and "white people"/"cis people"/"heterosexual people" etc. is a false analogy. Men are viewed as cannon fodder because of being men. There are no analogy of that for such signs as whiteness, cisness or heterosexuality. I understand your point, but all of those things have been used as reasoning for excluding other classes from service. In fact many militararies still include non hetero, or cis soldiers from service.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 02:59 AM
7

But even with that experience I never in my life try to test random individuals that are white. And tell them they have to prove to me they are not racist, and then they prove to me that they are one of the "good ones". That's a reasonable point, but I should remind you that people DO do that frequently. The problem is I would argue that for feminists the idea that this is reasonable enters mainstream culture, and is not just tolerated but has become the dominant culture. Yes, there are some peo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 02:56 AM
4

Yes, good point. You don't hear marxists saying that the 'rich need to do more', fascists saying that 'Jews need to learn not to bank', or racists saying blacks need to civilise themselves. That's inherently absurd, they always say these effects need to be forced upon them. I know black people aren't privileged, but racists say they are, hence 'welfare queens'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 02:45 AM
7

Yes, great channel btw.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 02:42 AM
14

Probably the same reason they're looking for the chance to blame any man ever for everything else. Is this just a trauma response or what’s going on here? Yes, and moreso: women are not shunned for saying insane stuff like this, which means rather than having to correct this misanthropic behaviour they get to form their own culture of manhatred. Everyone may think they're insane, but we don't act like it and send them to the fringes of society like we do with men like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 02:37 AM
13

Most felons are men.... they can't vote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/23 06:26 AM
3

Yeah because I'm sure male characters in romantic movies just scream the bare minimum right lol Men dont like romance movies becUse romance movies today suck. Every day at work my millennial coworkers and I quote the great romantic comedy lines to each other. As you wish Show me the money Help me help you There was more than one lobster present at the birth of Jesus
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/23 03:28 AM
3

and she doesn't say this particularly but I do frequently here things like ... lesbians & gay "people" ... not even us lovers of men can escape this matter eraser. This is an excellent example of the value of diversity, because a straight male this is something I never would have noticed without being told... And it's not just her, I know I've seen that EVERYWHERE, and I knew it sounded wierd, but I didn't know it was Orwellian doublespeak.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/23 06:12 AM
1

just erasing the maleness of these abused black bodies And the maleness of the problem itself. The prison industrial complex is a man's problem, but she desexes it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/23 06:06 AM
1

Maybe. I'm a big fan of scorched Earth, so if it suits us we should just rebrand.we have fsr fewer resources, so they invest more in antimale propaganda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/23 12:22 AM
1

I feel you, man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/23 11:57 PM
0

My heart bleeds for them. But they're not truly innocent. Except the kids, of course.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 09:56 AM
3

Fuck Israel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 07:24 AM
1

You mean when, right? You can see women defending Reifenstahl because she was a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 07:23 AM
0

There are no innocent people in Israel. It's existence is a war crime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 07:21 AM
1

Maybe. I think he might be right. Decades of Girl power and the myth of female moral superiority can only produce this effect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 07:18 AM
2

Thanks, we always need more voices from outside our Western spaces. seeing men kill and kidnap each other is just..... Idk who to support anymore both sides seem very wrong There is no side that is right in war. No one wins wars. But the Palestinians are just sefending their homes. If the most effective targets they have are women and children then they will kill women and children. The Israeli know this, but they expose them to danger anyways. I'm not excusing the use of terrorist tactics. I'm …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 07:17 AM
1

Their women is ok with it. I doubt that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 07:13 AM
10

They ignore the issue at any other point except when the topic of men being raped finally comes up and then they throw gay men under the bus just so they can go “it’s other men, look how awful men are.” Yes, as a heterosexual male I didn't notice that. Yet when straight guys mention uncomfortable experiences with gay men those same people call in homophobic Are you sure that's it? I'd be willing to bet that they do this when it's gay men saying the same thing, and if they're told that you're gay…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 07:43 AM
0

Perhaps I'm just more selective of those whom I call full of shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 07:40 AM
0

Dude, calm down. Were all friends here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 06:22 AM
1

Yeah I heard that theory recently, and it makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/23 07:38 AM
2

If not better. Upper class women lived longer than males because men had deadly obligations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/23 07:36 AM
2

The oppression is not gondad-based. It is class-based. I dont believe in Gonarchy, I'm a Repubican.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/23 07:35 AM
0

Then do not call patriarchy. Patriarchy doesn't mean a society made for men, they're brainwashing you. It means a society in which the the fathers rule. As in 'founding fathers', or patricians. A society where men rule would be mascularchy. Or if millennials named it wed call it Manarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/23 07:34 AM
2

The middle class is the middle 60% of the population. The wealthy are the top 10%, the working class is the lower 20%, and the poor are what remains. These can vary, but that's the broad breakdown.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/23 07:31 AM
1

So by saying 'it was still based on gender', you meant to say they were not still based on gender?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 11:34 PM
1

Work camps are still genocidal. They were being killed and deported still.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 09:43 AM
1

Also still genociding the men. Being worked to death is definitively genocide. Being WALKED to death or Even walked away is genocide
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 09:43 AM
3

Its the patriarchy, but for women, and real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 09:37 AM
4

yes, a little hyperbolic Not even a little.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 09:36 AM
2

War is peace Freedom is slavery Ignorance is strength
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 09:34 AM
1

Well, IMHO the problem with interventionism is that the people who do the intervention are the last people we trust with our own contries, and do it for the reasons we distain them. I think if we had good meaining, good people determining what we do and how the results would be less inhuman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/23 10:27 PM
0

Dipstick mens rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/23 07:52 AM
8

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/23 07:51 AM
3

Wokeism is top-down by companies, Hollywood, governments. The actual leaders of governments too, not the 45th minister without power. They're a satire of the patriarchal structire they claim exists. You need the clerical sanction of their church as 'feminist', which is paid for by tithe to the first church of our lady Dworkin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/23 07:50 AM
3

Serfs. Slaves can move.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/23 02:26 AM
9

MY FOCKING RIZOTTO.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/23 09:27 PM
1

That's the definition, from wiki. You're entitled to your own opinion, but you're not entitled to your own facts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/23 09:25 PM
3

Textbook fascism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 11:46 PM
3

Because people confused object with inanimate object.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 11:45 PM
0

>"Freudian slip" refers to unintended libidinal innuendo.... Yeah I misspoke, I meant to say projection You should read the actual definition of Freudian slip, because you're wayyyyyy off: 'In psychoanalysis, a Freudian slip, also called parapraxis, is an error in speech, memory, or physical action that occurs due to the interference of an unconscious subdued wish or internal train of thought.' Now if you don't mind I'm going to have sex with my mother. I mean my mother is sexy. I mean sex... pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 09:51 PM
4

Yes, that's true, but I choose to leave that out of debates with these people as they will not believe it, and will likely get a bias agsinst you for this claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 09:20 AM
4

What happened to thread muted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 09:19 AM
2

I don't have a lot of sympathy for men crying about dating because: I don't date. Well, that's not the point, so I dont think anyone cares. In order for me to be at peace, I just have to do one thing: not dating them. I don't fear getting raped or killed by them, I sleep well. Your ignorance is not equal to knowledge. This is wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 09:18 AM
1

Dude, calm down. I have no idea what is the point of OP's post. But yeah, seriously, if that's how women feel, then their need for safety is more important than me not getting my dick wet. I'll survive that. I like how after anything you have no idea what the point is, you try and disprove that point... you failed to do so, btw... also it takes 3rd grade reading to understand it, so you're clearly blinded by your own frothing salival madness. You know how Margery Taylor green sounds? That's how …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 09:09 AM
1

Lol no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 09:08 AM
9

They're probably about as rate as other false accusations, which is around 10-30%.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 08:58 AM
8

Yeah, the actual number is probably around 15-30%, like most crimes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 08:55 AM
7

Demand proof. The burden of proof is on them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 08:53 AM
0

It's a joke when it's such common knowledge that it's literally a cliche. Literally. That's why it's a joke. You asked for something really silly. And you should have just said, 'no, I'm serious'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 07:28 AM
1

some Then you will have no problem indicating the men that this ideology privileges. Fully half, if it pleases you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 07:03 AM
0

you're literally just saying that the only men that have a problem with Feminism are angry Incels that can't get laid. That's not what literally means. You mean implicitly. Which it's not, jesus christ, man. Not every male is 5'5, bald... or the other contrivances that you just said every male has. Implicitly, mind you... noticd how I didn't say you literally said that? It's not hard... That's what she said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 07:02 AM
2

Ridiculous. Maybe on Mars, but here on earth crazier things happen in saner stories. Any evidence for this, either? That's got to be a joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 06:59 AM
1

Social justice types are often full of hypocrisy and one-sided justifications and prone to massive blindspots but there is nothing relatable or realistic about a dormitory full of feminazis who welcome being groped unsolicited by one man but file a Title 9 complaint against another for politely asking a girl out to dinner Yes, almost as if that's something that no one this side of bedlam would right, and this merits a serious revision to make sure you didnt misread it badly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 06:56 AM
3

"I knew a guy at uni who really did grope women he had just met, without their permission." Were the women he was groping the maligned "feminists" here? It changes nothing if they weren't. unfortunately, it seems largely unrelated to every other aspect of your argument/tale, unless you see the women who didn't confront the dude who groped them with the woman who sent you to 'consent class' for asking her out, along with your parents, your teachers, etc., as all part of some homogenous hivemind c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 06:53 AM
5

Not to knock the effort, but the reason I think analyzing so much isn’t necessary is because we can see virtually 100% of Feminists are hateful, castrating, venomous, belligerent, insatiable, moral hypocrites. Yep, that's why I'm not a feminist. They made it thoroughly clear throughout my youth that they viewed me with contempt. And I'd point out that the number of times you'll see a feminist calling out this misbhehaviour, misbahaviour you see every day is likely the same as mine: literally not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 06:46 AM
2

Feminists think that policies that favour females are left wing and policies that favour males right wing. They absolutely disregard that what makes a policy left wing is if it favours the minority; in cases where women have advantages, policies that favour them are conservative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 06:42 AM
2

Oh yeah. It's about everything. War is the most stark effect, but it goes down to the most banal choices we make. The economy is the most important subject of manufactured consent, followed by social issues like feminism, art, culture etc..
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 08:11 AM
3

Actually that's exactly what I'm saying that does NOT happen. Manufacturing consent isn't deliberate. They don't do it consciously even. If you haven't read manufacturing consent, put down your phone and go read it. But that being said: what I'm trying to say is that basically they are only focussing on those goofballs because they want to focus on them. They don't want to cover any legitimate mens rights, so they don't. The key idea of manufacturing consent is that the media organically conspir…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 07:37 AM
9

Yeah, they're going to call us women hating misogynists who ignore women's issues no matter what we do. We might as well do whatever we want
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 02:25 AM
3

Courage literally means having heart. He doesn't mean he is afraid, but rarher lacks the drive to continue. Encouragement doesn't only mean to dispel fear, but also the will to continue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 02:23 AM
2

That being said, the new brash wave of right wing male advocates that have appeared online in recent years (e.g. Andrew Tate, Fresh & Fit, etc ) have turned what should be an easy win for men’s causes, into a laughing stock. Advocating for men’s issues should actually be one of the easiest things to do when you have a large platform. Are you familiar with Noam Chomskys manufacturing consent?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 02:16 AM
1

A lot of the domination of the discussion of gender issues is partly because of clearly defined understandings of what terms like sexual harrasment are and manifest as for women. Being called an incel, by definition, is sexual harassment, but it's not understood as such. Exactly. There, I feel, are a lot of common experiences on the part of men, that, if you look through that same lense, would make up a lot of ground in those gender-disparity statistics. Precisely. I think in fact the disparity …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 11:42 PM
2

Thus why a lot of leftists are tankies. Tankies are leftists. They are just stupid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 04:16 AM
2

Feminists think 25% of women are raped or sexually harassed, at least once in their life (in USA). Everyone is sexually harassed once in their month. You've probably been called an incel for posting here, you just can ignore it because you're a big boy. Anyone who's been online once has received more rape threats than every woman between 1820-1985.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 04:14 AM
2

And one of the frustrating truths is that certain lobbies have been very influential in preventing progress for men and boys. That's rule no. 1 about effectiveness right there: Its not about pursuasion, it's about mobilisation. Every second you spend arguing with these people is a second youve wasted. Focus on informing those who will listen, directing those who need direction, and organising.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 04:09 AM
19

Less than 50% of the population. It's a good listhmus test for subreddits. Its about states rats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 04:06 AM
5

facts No. Feelings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 04:05 AM
3

That's because trolling is all they're good for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 04:04 AM
0

As another poly man How can you be more than one person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/23 08:02 AM
3

Facts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/23 10:07 AM
0

If you have 100 men and 100 women and 10 of those men decide men need to be leaders and the 100 women agree and the other 90 men accept majority rule and go off on their own, you have a patriarchal society through the consent of women. Women are the majority of voters, this is an alleged patriarchy at the demand of women. We don't live in a patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/23 07:59 AM
3

Really? That would explain a lot
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/23 07:50 AM
1

I'm sorry, I'm not familiar with that turn of phrase; what does this mean, 'to level up'?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/23 05:09 AM
1

In fact, it’s very difficult to analyze these two positions, because many feminine men don’t look like feminine men – they hide their femininity to avoid physical violence. Are they talking about gay men, or men who express feminine traits? Because if its gay men, Alexander the great, Frederich the great, and Abe Lincoln were not 'oppressed'. Including conservative women who works in schools, who raise children and who play a big role in socialization of boys. They need manifesto that would view…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/23 08:49 PM
1

Do keep in mind that most Trans ppl&Gay men tend to be outspoken feminist allies, That's not been my experience. They want to appropriate their struggle, but they don't really have the LGBT full support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/23 07:50 AM
2

The misogyny part is ridiculous. No one's afraid of them because they're 'real women'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/23 07:45 AM
1

There is one exception I think…. Homophobia. Homophobia is mostly against gay/bisexual men and because they wouldn’t prey on women and we all know men can’t be victims /s, they use children. “Gays are indoctrinating our kids!! Drag queens are grooming out children!!” Interesting point
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/23 07:42 AM
3

Precisely my point. Thanks for listening!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/23 01:48 AM
1

Pink maga
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 12:36 AM
3

Well said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 12:35 AM
7

He saved me the effort of explaining. I second his comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 12:35 AM
7

Were they though? Listen to their key memories in their biographies. It's literally like 60% of the time daddy issues. Like 20% their highschool boyfriend, and 20% of the time actually caring about feminist values. It seems like they were told stories Oh. That's what you're missing. Role models are not only people you know, but everything you see. That includes anecdotes, stories, or even media. Obi Wan Kenobi is a role model, king Arthur, and Jesus Christ are all role models. Edit: for example …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 12:34 AM
3

If it prevents harassment and violence towards women then it doesn't seem like such a big deal. That's not how a free society works. Rights dont exist to protect popular stuff, they exist to protect unpopular things. I'm more interested in where we can support men where we're disfavored... What about for example: at will workers who aren't protected by workplace standards in a wide swathe of discriminitory practices, and are by their nature as povert level workers marginalised? like in education…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 12:25 AM
3

There will be an option to help maintain racial purity too, right? I don't want to have to take the risk of having to ride with eine Untermensch. I just don't feel safe giving my money to a jewish person. Also black people might mug me. And lets not forget that asians are bad drivers, right? Its just about me feeling safe. I place my safety Ober Als.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 09:02 AM
4

Yeah, and maybe we could start redlining housing again to let the white women feel safer with all them superpredators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 08:57 AM
1

Women give peeferential service to wom... lol I can't say that with a straight face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 08:54 AM
3

When it doesn't suit them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 08:53 AM
3

Can't males be nonbinary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 08:53 AM
25

The whole thing is a bizarre series of circular rationalizations that are necessary's for this worldview to make whatever passes for sense in their brains. Fascism is everything and nothing at the same time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 08:50 AM
16

You're a credit to your race
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 08:48 AM
22

It's simple: they were exposed to bad male role models and since society treats women like children they are not expected to grow up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/23 08:45 AM
1

Patriarchy Not in the first world. Rape Culture Only in the most primitive countries. Systemic/Systematic/Institutionalized Misogyny Of course. Male Domination What does that even mean. Male Privilege Not in any way that 'privilege' actually means. Female Oppression/suppression/ It exists. Glass ceilings Conceivably. The number of female executives makes this a weak argument, especially with the enormous growth of eomen in positions of powrt in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/23 08:53 AM
3

Skeleton_Warrior SKELETON WARRIORS.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/23 08:50 AM
1

Yes, but that's a meaningless statement. Science doesn't prove anything for certain, it disproves falsehood. We can't know for certain the shape of the earth or that gravity is real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/23 06:23 AM
1

They live exactly the same way we did. Not close, identical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/23 06:08 AM
1

That's not what speculation means. If this is speculation, then there is no such thing as fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/23 06:07 AM
8

You should say 'civilisation' because that's what you're referring to, which is the past 10,000 years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:57 PM
17

>Better yet, we have no fucking idea how humans have lived throughout vast majority of our history. I guess we can guess, but that is all we can do. We have some pretty good ideas by looking at cultures that still live the way we did for most of history. The San people, for example. It's not sexist at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:55 PM
4

And it's not like they're fucking unaware.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:53 PM
24

You don't understand the value that free stickers have to adult males.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:24 AM
27

There's no way this is not an attempt to sound concerned about male attendance but actually be trying to stir up opposition to it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:24 AM
27

Some schools are trying to attract male applicants by improving their sports programs; others invest more heavily in buying boys’ email addresses or give incentives to boys that they do not offer to girls — such as free stickers or baseball caps — for filling out information on the school website. Really
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:18 AM
1

Thanks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:18 AM
5

New opinions are always suspected, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common. John Locke
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 07:08 PM
3

I think most people are afraid of their sexuality being questioned, tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 07:06 PM
13

Why don't men speak? Why don't women listen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 07:06 PM
12

Either they are stronger or their dick cannot work and if it does, they wanted it. This is so infuriating because it's the same shit they rail against when women are told it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 07:05 PM
3

Oh gee you dont say. ... I'm sorry to hear that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 07:04 PM
63

This may be a weird thing to say, but I think mesnlib, as well as many other feminist male-oriented organisations exist to control the narrative on men's issues, turning any discussion away from one that could criticise feminism. In other words I think they're just thinly veiled psyops lol. Yep, this is broadly accepted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 03:48 PM
2

Really? Well, that's interesting to know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 03:47 PM
1

That's a no. Jesus Christ, man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 09:04 AM
1

That was a yes or no question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 07:20 AM
2

I'm not sure it's that progressive. It was designed with racist and classist elements that are antithetical to free markets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:30 AM
1

putting money directly in the hands of the largest consumer group? Putting money into the infantilised sexe that is more vulnerable to emotional marketing, which is the cornerstone of consumerism. Not that I'm saying women's liberation is bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:28 AM
1

These people will not stay leftist - they are young and will be conservative in 20 years. I somehwhat disagree, i think he's a stupid leftist now and is going to be a stupid leftist tomorrow... While I have sympathy for some aspects of “ tankies”, Maoists, and third world nationalists ideas, there are also serious problems as the 20th century revealed, and Second Thought is under their influence. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who's had this evaluation of him. I think the tankies are a hug…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:26 AM
1

Yes, that is correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:21 AM
1

Where did you get such a conclusion? It certainly is not stated in the abstract of the study I think he's using loaded language, but I don't see how you can not see where that conclusion came from. He highlighted the quote, didnt he?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:19 AM
1

Why are relationships only able to survive if women can put up with men? I like how you're implying women are inherently duplicitous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:14 AM
2

He's referring to how feminists want to maintain the advantages of benevolent sexism while receiving the respect of being independent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:11 AM
1

You meant to say 'moist', right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:05 AM
1

I think all ideologies are cancer. The problems of Modernism melted away with the adoption of the after people accepted that policies should be based on science, AKA progressivism. Its not a coincidence that the rise of ideologies in the past 50 years have coincided with a societal wide detrioration. I'm sorry, but we're going to have to learn to think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:03 AM
1

Feminism is often touted as a left wing ideology. So is it really? It's not. It's an expression of liberalism, which is on the centre of the political spectrum. That makes it as left wing as Ronald Reagan or Dick Cheney.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 03:00 AM
6

They are a major drain to the Japanese economy and population, since they rarely have jobs and procreate. This video explains it in more detail: All of that is backwards. They exist because they dont have jobs and can't procreate. Fix the economy and it's over.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 02:57 AM
2

and then we as a country will have to endure the consequences that it had for Japan. Dont worry, we won't. But buckle your sphincter this is going to be a hell of a ride.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 02:55 AM
3

Rape stats that don't include prisons HEY, they're only rapists because we turned them into bonded slave labour. Which was their fault somehow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 02:52 AM
7

Feminist news is a great example of doublespeak. If it were news, it'd be called news.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 02:49 AM
45

Feminists don't care about men's issues. Lol you wish. They relish every ounce of suffering any man must endure, and if you go to any thread in any feminist board about anything bad happening to any men, no matter how cruel or petty you'll find a coven of chortling harpies giggling with glee at the meerest glimpse of schadenfreude. Some of them will joke that when the fortunes of women are better they will enact awons of vengeance on man for the past 10,000 years of indignities. They are not jok…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/23 02:48 AM
1

I have wanted to ask why some of our club members think we need to go out of our way to try to attract more women. I think this is better understood from your own self interest and that of the club: the culture and resilience of any society depends on its diversity. Obviously sex is an enormous source of diversity. Women bring a different life experience and perspective with them and they tend to have different skills, frequently at different rations than men. You might find that positions or ca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/23 09:39 AM
1

I mean if you choose to make a subreddit at your own will understand that you have to moderate said subreddit why should you be paid for it? You're misunderstanding the problem: The structure of the business is wrong. The reason they don't have paid moderators that enforce a visible code of conduct is that this would leave them vulnerable to criticism, and allows them to force the burden of cost onto their consumers. To answer your question literally: they shouldn't. To answer your question prac…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 06:30 AM
1

VERY NICE
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:50 AM
1

I like how everything else on that list is a pervert. Such open.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 08:06 PM
5

Batman and Bond both went to college and excelled at their academics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/23 08:55 AM
7

Action is the masculine and passivity is feminine. In traditional cultural understandings of three terms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/23 08:54 AM
2

Give them sons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/23 06:12 AM
1

I think they had everything handed to them except male privilege, which only matters to them because they have evening else, so first born male status is so unfair because I didnt have the benis. But yeah I largely agree, and feminism is headed the most insular meatheaded burgers, which is why they focus exclusively on absurd nonproblems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/23 09:38 PM
9

Like fucking no one ever should feel safe at night, haven't they seen any movie ever?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/23 09:34 PM
1

Honeydew No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/23 08:16 AM
1

Ignore it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/23 08:10 AM
14

This is true, but dated. The recent influx of homeless onto the streets is due to the cost of living become unachievably high. That's why the number of homeless has increased beyond the rate of the homeless dying... which was previously able to keep their numbers in check, on account of the average life span being measured in mere months.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/23 02:42 AM
27

Sir, that was correct decades ago, but the rise in homelessness is due to the cost of living, currently. Fully functional adults with no independents and full time jobs are not able to afford the cost of living. If you need some literature on the subject, which is understandable, I can provide it, but you may also do your own research if you prefer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/23 02:38 AM
29

>considerable amount of money: millions Uh. Dude. What? You know that's like, a Vancouver apartment. Millions is an inconsiderable amount of money. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRAkobf-tVI&ab_channel=TheSmokingSkull This problem will cost many BILLIONS of dollars. I don't know what to tell you, but you're not going to get far against a four decade long problem costing economies hundreds of billions by spending... millions. The homelessness crisis in Canada costs us 7 billion each year. ​ So t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/23 02:36 AM
7

That's fourth wave feminism. Third wave feminism was the 'girl power'/'lean in' feminism from the 90's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/23 07:07 PM
1

I agree with your assessment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/23 07:05 PM
1

>Post-modernism would reject any meta-narrative, including Marxist and Darwinian axioms, that history is the story of class struggles in the survival of the fittest. Yeah, you know I almost wrote the exact same thing but I decided it would be too tangential and might distract from the conversation. I agree with most of your assessment of the ideology as rather accurate, but the following I'm rather skeptical about: >Post-modernist culture is beyond parody because the pursuit of ripping apart pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/23 03:50 AM
1

People learn that the Nazis used bad science and ignored good science. They never learn that people today do the same (except for religious extremists, I suppose), and they certainly never learn that they probably do it themselves. I can't say I agree with that. I think that any education about nazi science includes the lesson of what you're talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/23 03:28 AM
1

The problem is that "controversial" things do not get researched in social sciences. Manufacturing consent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/23 01:59 AM
1

Those aren't postmodern ideas. Post modernism says people who think like that are morons. The reason why so much post modernist culture is absurd and satirical is because it's directly poking fun at ideologues. If you would allow me to give you an example: a post modernist idea is: there is no such thing as 'identity'. Further there is no such thing as 'policy'. Those are jarring statements, sure, but the gist of the idea is this: 'who decides what identity is? Do you alone? Is it an objective q…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/23 01:58 AM
1

Actually a further point I"m not sure I accurately explained the meaing of my previous point like you asked: It's not about broad appeal of an idea, it's about getting the specific people we need to enact the policies we want. We already have a vast surplus of people who recognise these facts. We don't need 10%, but we have something like 60%. Getting this number to the maximum, say 80% will not change anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/23 01:43 AM
1

I'm saying it's an ineffective strategy. Targeting the ignorant is not smart; they ignore reality, that's why they're ignorant. Also not all proof is good proof. 'Unless you're saying we've already reached the necessary percentage...' Ironically this proves my point indirectly. We already have persuaded a broad majorarity of this fact; everyone learns this in high school when they learn about the Nazis and the soviets, and... every other despot. I mean, political correctness is literally, LITERA…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/23 01:38 AM
2

Politics is a science. Partisanship doesn't mix with science. And ideology... did you know that the progressive began specifically in opposition to how progressives realised that policies were based on ideological were ineffective, and wanted to base policy on science rather than ideology? That's why the middle of the last century didn't suck, and coincidently the increase in sucky policies has coincided with the return to ideological positions. The question shouldn't be 'is this a socialist/cap…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/23 12:01 AM
1

I don't think anybody who needs to be shown this is someone we care about persuading. I can't remember what the number is, but Ralph Nader explains that no social movement has ever needed to mobilise anything more than a tiny percentage of the population, and usually it's in the low single digits.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/23 11:53 PM
6

Manufacturing consent. I don’t have the papers, but was in academia for an extended period of time. The universities simply don’t fund papers that might end in these findings. That was my concern as to this research. It’s why you’ll see papers openly stating that males show higher rates of overt hyper-competitiveness and aggression, And why you dont find descriptions of those traits that clarify the scientific meaning of those terms is intended, rather than the common use of those terms which ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/23 08:59 PM
1

The study found that scholars were more willing to suppress findings that were politically incorrect than findings that were politically correct. The authors suggest that this may indicate a problem with the current academic culture, where there is a fear of publishing research that goes against the prevailing political and social norms. Do we really need a study to prove this? It's common sense. And people over use the term common sense, but this is really common sense. Yes, the ugly truth is u…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/23 08:40 PM
1

Yes, that's accurate! The law is that you can't discharge firearms within a certain distance of a house... which means unfortunately I can't shoot a deer out the window. Which matters to me because there are deer out of my wingdow eating my produce. But if I move asmidge further into the country I can shoot them. But yeah: it's not as hard as Americans make it sound.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 07:40 PM
1

Yeah i completely agree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/23 08:43 AM
9

Does it? The women in 1984 had the appropriate reaction, about the same as men today. I think this moreso proves that it's about propaganda rather than innate bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/23 09:41 AM
2

Really? I thought they were all dog faced from their horrible life experiences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/23 08:50 AM
2

OP: the sentencing gap isn't just about motherhood, it's simply legal system manifestation of the 'women are wonderful' effect. I don't agree with that. I think it's mostly the value that men have as slave labour and the value of creating a secondary underclass in society/keeping the proles in line. Disgruntled men have been the death of many civilisations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/23 08:49 AM
1

But it made me wonder how much of the gender sentencing gap is due to the veneration of motherhood, Significantly. I've read articles about it before, and some attention has been paid to the subject
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/23 08:47 AM
1

That's not an appeal to authority. An appeal to authority is kind of the opposite. Its saying what an authority says must be true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 08:28 PM
0

You can't, laymen should rely on people whose job it is to interpret studies for us. I can't remember what that's called though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 07:55 AM
5

Yet whenever I ask about how I, as a man, is advantaged in society, that’s all I seem to hear; 87% of billionaires are men, not to mention 80% of politicians, 100% of US Presidents, and I get it, I want those imbalances addressed too. Those aren't advantages common to all men, they arent even common to half of men, 10% of men, or 1% of men. She needs an example that at least 9/10 men enjoy. And that's being generous, because the weak who need the most want the most, the last 10% matters more tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 07:52 AM
3

“But it’s not about you, it’s what you represent”, Guilt by association is illegal under the human rights convention. Also literally sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 07:46 AM
1

No. 7 is wrong. Failing to account for the stunningly short lifespan of homeless people, which is measure in years, not decades. Most homeless people look old because they're homeless, not because of their age. Also billionaires live longer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 07:44 AM
21

No, they ARE obligated because they call themselves egalitarians, They also call themselves human, right? I'm pretty sure reciprocity is what defines the human.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 07:35 AM
5

Women dominate social institutions, and women who get to the top of any institution feel the need to use their power to punish men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 07:33 AM
11

Without fail, I'll get a response from some exasperated feminist saying that they aren't obligated to help (true) False. It's called 'humanity', you are obligated to help your fellows.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 07:30 AM
1

But the ancient ones weren't just blips. Weapons Predates civilisation domesticated animals Predates civilisation farming Predate civilisation. Also that's what caused civilisation, so it intrinsically cant happen because of civilisation writing Not universal until the time period I mentioned, so that's actually a point against your stance. The literacy rate in 1820 was 12% btw, so that's like saying a benefit of civilisation was that everyone was in the noble class and privileged. printing pres…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/23 06:46 PM
1

He's right, although off by about a century, which is like literally less than 1%, so lets be real that's good enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/23 06:03 AM
1

They haven't. They've all arrived in the past century. Like 90% of them. I can get some literature if you want it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/23 06:02 AM
8

IDK but I'm tempted to leave this sub. If Im not going to be randomly bullied by mods who need to take out their frustration on me for no reason, why bother.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/23 07:10 AM
3

Marcy and Tobias work off the theory of that monogamy emerged out a need to support patrilineal inheritance I personally prefer the theory that as civilisations first developed the outsider occupations of trade, war, and industry which were previously marginal crafts moved power into the male sphere of influence, which over time eroded the biological advantages women hold over power. In the end of the matriachal government war chief became aynonynous with chief. Obviously, living in this era was…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/23 07:09 AM
3

All jokes aside, who fucking cares what you wear. I have yet to see a crossdressing androgynous twink commit a mass shooting. I'm pretty they already have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/23 04:59 AM
15

Bens about as unlibertarian as one can get.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/23 04:58 AM
1

How does one define the self.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 08:49 AM
1

My ex-girlfriend (let's call her Sirine) Is she from Libya? Rather, the one opinion she has that really gets to me is also one that seems to be a defining characteristic of left-wing politics today; namely, that the only people allowed to have a perspective on an issue that primarily affects one group are those who belong to said group I prefer to frame points in ways that directly appeal to their self interest: Does she really think that setting the precedent that groups should be entirely auto…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 08:46 AM
2

That's because you're not a child. I know That feeling too. I feel insulted when someone thinks I'm that stupid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 08:22 AM
0

If patriarchy is a system that intrinsically benefits men in all areas of society That would be a mascularchy. A patriarchy is government by elder men in families, the fathers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 08:21 AM
1

Sounds like we live in a Chinarchy then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 08:15 AM
1

You know attackers aren't a different sex than defenders, right? They're both mostly male, so sex isnt an issue. Its just bigotry in terms of fear mongering, and bigotry in the disproportionate attention paid to female victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 08:11 AM
1

Even in places where the cost is covered... While I was surprised when I learned this, I also remembered that every woman ever won't stop talking about how much they wish they had a dick.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 10:51 PM
-1

Do or do not. There is no try.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:50 AM
2

I also think that there’s this really toxic TERF narrative of trans men transitioning to get male privilege or because they have sexual trauma and there’s no other reason to transition otherwise. That sounds like a horror science fiction plot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:49 AM
2

How can you feel male but hate on men? Most hate is self directed. Even moreso if you consider how much hate is projection. That's why its important to love yourself, because if you don't your ability to love your fellow is weakened.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:48 AM
4

I don't think rightwing vs. Leftwing aligns along the male vs. Female axis as people want us to think. The left favours the minority and the right favours the majority; in cases where men are disadvantaged the left ought to favour men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:46 AM
7

And that's why we can't condone hate against anyone. The second hate becomes acceptable against one group of people it can become acceptable against anyone... and it usually falls on the marginalised right after.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:41 AM
1

I highly doubt any mod ever is that good at their job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:39 AM
4

A large amount of trans people don't perform the bottom surgery, even a majority of trans females.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:38 AM
3

I wonder how long it will take for trans men to start heading that direction. I don't think it will. While gay people want open acceptance trans people want to be invisible, or at least most do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:36 AM
3

Wow, that's terrible, I'm sorry to hear that. I've seem it mentioned that the misandry towards males was going to bleed over into trans culture (both trans males and females), but it's still shocking to see.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 09:34 AM
1

Whatever I don't even drink beer
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/23 07:56 AM
3

Also half of the corporations were Started by women. And they were all using women's recipes. And men were drinking lead, how stupid is she.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/23 07:55 AM
7

But let's stop calling it a patriarchy when clearly that is no longer an accurate description of our present-day reality. Patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. You can't prove it false because it's not based on rationality. That's what a conspiracy theory is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/23 07:53 AM
1

Ah, very good! The specific idea of the book I thought relevant was the idea of 'doublespeak'. It's not a coincidence or incompetence that causes them to use equality to promote inequality, it is deliberate. They call it equality because it is not equality, and when you speak out against it, they can say you oppose 'equality'. Not to mention this is an effective way to get measures of law past those who are not knowledgeable. Speaking of ignorance, it also has the effect of 'doublethink' on thos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 07:45 AM
-2

You know that's a common misunderstanding of the expression 'there are no girls on the internet', right? It doesn't mean there are no women online, and we've always known that there are tonnes of girls here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 07:27 AM
5

>This is true for some forms of harassment, but not all. Women definitely DO suffer more sexual harassment online than men do, even given identical behavior. Now you see, that's the orthodox position, but I don't agree, actually. >Sure as a man you'll suffer things like homophobic slurs in some spaces I believe that we as men write off the vast majority of sexual harassment because we're used to it IRL. I don't know about you, but online I experience constant attacks on my masculinity, sexual pr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 07:22 AM
2

I was totally going to comment something like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 07:17 AM
1

That's something that always annoy me when talking with feminist aligned people. They use the word "equality", but seem to lack the understanding that an equality, or any comparison, involves two parameters. Have you read great English author George Orwell's 1984? I'm not sure how much penetration he has into the francosphere, so forgive me if that's universal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 07:24 AM
1

I am not good a math It's Feminist math.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 07:22 AM
3

At that moment, one woman from the ministry was all shock and outrage "it's not because there is no directive towards men that we don't care", "I support and oppose many things, but not enough to pick up a pen' -Bender B. Rodriguez
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 07:21 AM
1

'How many times have you driven by a fire and thought "how can this benefit me"'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 07:15 AM
1

Yeah, what does that even mean? Is masculonity in women, too? Is it like the darkside of the force? Or is it intronsic to the male that he uniquely grapples with morality, unlike the woman?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 07:14 AM
2

On one hand I guessed people can say this is positive masculinity It's objectively not. A civilised man uses his words. Masculinity is defined by strength in the face of opposition; in the words of great general Sun Tzu: the ultimate form of conflict is to defeat ones enemy without fighting. A strong man can fight with his words. It is said that the pen is mightier than the sword. To be honest, if we all view masculinity as a spectrum. I prefer the Jungian achetypes of masculinity. They all have…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 07:12 AM
13

When women were introduced into male competitiveness in the workplace, even with the red carpet laid out, many of them thought they were being discriminated against. In reality, they weren’t (most of the time), it was just they never heard men complain about how ruthless it can be, so they thought it’d be easy. Not to mention being in competition with men means they would for the first time experience male aggression from the point of view of a male: you have nothing to give them except your def…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 06:57 AM
9

And they can't frame it as being 'traditional' in the sense that the sexes ought to be separated, so they have to be explicitely sexist... that's a well thought point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 06:53 AM
14

I also feel like with the growing transphobia and TERFism, many of that is rooted in misandry. Yeah, that's a good point. It's hard to remember sometimes that they fear them because they think they're men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 06:52 AM
1

person from either family that can force them apart from doing things they're not allowed to anymore Jinga, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 06:49 AM
1

Men can have multiple orgasms. And it's awesome btw.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:33 AM
2

That would also explain their tenderness towards extreme antisexual views, especially given the points of biological value their sexuality grant which are litetally irreplaceable in society.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:31 AM
1

o "Oh, but he probably had trauma as a child, it's understandable he would behave that way. It's far more important to look at the systemic issues that let to his actions than blame him specifically" He did, though. And it is. Not that I don't get your point. Hitler doesn't get this benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:29 AM
1

Your question is invalid: they're acting illogically is the point
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:26 AM
1

Knives aren't a suitable replacement for guns. You get fewer murders period... Knives are much harder to kill with. That's why people use guns.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:22 AM
1

That's not what causes firearm violence. Canada has similarly liberal laws and we have European levels of violence.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:21 AM
1

It sounds stupid in North America too. That's why we're suprised feminists dont do it
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:19 AM
1

Too phallic.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:18 AM
1

You said that Men's Rights will be targeted Yes. so we should adopt an unassailable position Yes. ...i.e gender neutral social welfare. No. First: I didn't say gender neutral. I specifically said gendered. You got the opposite of what I said. Second: It's still mens social welfare. The policies are exactly the same. I did not say in any way to change the policies. ...If it's half as confusing for feminists as it is for the people here, this is a bulletproof plan that they'll never see coming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/23 02:30 AM
1

If i understand correctly, you're saying that we should give up on advocating for male specific solutions because that's an unassailable position?? Not even close. What on earth made you think that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/23 11:00 PM
1

Dude, that doesn't matter. The point is that it's an illustration of what I'm talking about, do you understand that point? It's just a model: https://youtu.be/7ffj8SHrbk0?t=30
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/23 05:20 AM
1

>'How is that possible? How are you going to advocate for male specific mental health programs or male spaces, if you can't even talk about it? I didn't say don't talk about it, I said don't name it. Example: gender safe spaces. Women's only spaces already exist. Therefore: talking about creating gender neutral spaces is de facto talking about men's spaces. The women's health infrastructure already exists. That means whenever we talk about creating gendered health infrastructure we're talking ab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/23 02:27 AM
1

Khorne cares not from whence the blood flows, only that it does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 05:36 AM
1

First ten responses get seats on my Kurultai, and a sign on bonus of 500 human skulls. For Khorne.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 05:33 AM
3

If communism happens I'm starting a horde. dontcallmehun crushyourenemies KHAN
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 05:30 AM
1

I, maybe naively, believe that the way to winning an ideological battle is to change people's hearts and minds Objectively wrong. The ideologue's head is the only commercially viable material that can cut glass. To defeat one's enemy, one must use guile. All conflict is deception, thus one must appear far when they are near, near when they are far, many when they are few, few where they are many, etc.. Read Sun Tzu's art of war. You can go through all the statistics, the journals, the tweets, bl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 05:26 AM
1

That's sexist though because women are more visible than men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 05:14 AM
3

And if they are, there are no gibs in the game.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 04:18 AM
6

After she was proven to be a duplicitous, murderess who back stabbed him multiple times. But yeah me too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 04:17 AM
8

Women slapping men across the face because he did something stupid is a very common trope and is always portrayed as funny/quirky. Worth mentioning that this varies in extremity to ludicrous levels, including women literally summarily executing men for unwelcome comments. Frequently for humour, and intended with escapist implications.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 04:16 AM
1

>I don’t understand where this line of questioning is headed. Why is 90% of your post a statement if you literally don't know what I'm talking about? Why aren't you asking for clarification. >Gender mix notwithstanding, the number of seats is the number of seats and the number of males in those seats isn’t going to change that calculus. I'm saying that society needs to spend our political capital on increasing the number of those seats, not 'correcting' the gender balance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/23 04:48 AM
1

They don't. I said: >in Canada where I live it’s pretty good not >in Canada, where I live it’s pretty good The nurses in the Eastern provinces, as well as the have not central provinces, are doing shit. Those are in North America. Also I don't know how well the Nunavut or Yukon nurses are doing, since I don't know the conversion rate between saltfish and dollars, but I'm pretty sure it's horrifying, on account of how the government won't splurge on a dock for the whole province.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/23 04:33 AM
1

Don't males make up a majority of most professions, and disproportionately those who practice in the most demanding specialties, and also work more continously in their jobs, whilst taking far less time off from their careers?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 03:09 AM
1

Yes, I’ll cede that my perspective is largely North American focused. Canada is in North America. Here Covid had created a situation where the need for licensed nurses is so greatly outstripping supply combined with truly horrific conditions Yeah it's different elsewhere because we pay our nurses throigh the state, so their wages have retarded for decades as a balance to try and reign in medical spending. The result of that is that the number of nurses entering the field is vastly inadequate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 03:05 AM
2

>Did it actually happen that way through - as an explicit restriction? That's not a bad question, and for what it's worth: it did actually go both ways. Usually it started as implicit, especially during modernism. But you will recall... in fact I can see you mention some knowledge further down in y our post of this that women achieved suffrage closely after men. I'm sure you'll recall that the MO of their struggle was broadly speaking to publicly run afoul of the implicit law and force a legal j…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 01:17 AM
3

There are evil people in every demographic, the only unique thing about women is you have a societal enablement of female hatred. If this were acceptable for white people, as it has been in the pass, the fascist pigs would be doing the same thing. ​ Don't feel hatred, even for yourself. Feel empathy for those who suffer for that hatred.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 12:39 AM
1

SIEG HEIL!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 12:34 AM
1

This doesn't address your point, but I should point out that >Nurses are doing well right now... That's not true, broadly speaking. There are pockets where they do okay, in Canada where I live it's pretty good, but I know that in some countries like the UK they rely on food banks. They're not doing well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 12:34 AM
1

>Physician shortages are artificial... That's the point, yes. We're saying it's not driven by market forces... Also we're both leftists here, we can drop the charade that shortages of anything can be artificial or not. They're always artificial; we always have control over our resources as a society, from water to doctors. >...and created by the AMA to protect physician’s incomes. Yes. And no. The AMA is a bureaucracy. Bureaucracies exist to serve themselves, like every oligarchy. They don't exi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 12:31 AM
2

I assume some are good people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:36 AM
1

Ubermensch, ja sehr gut.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:33 AM
1

Good points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:27 AM
0

FWIW, higher education isn’t exactly the economic escalator it used to be. He's not talking about the finances of those attending school. He's talking about the deficite of doctors, engineers, and lawyers we're creating by focussing on increasing female participation past the ideal levels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:26 AM
2

Their brains are fried from the coal fumes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:23 AM
3

That's the dangerous thing about propaganda: you dont need to consume it to be fooled by it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:20 AM
3

Yeah it's an advanced sociological subject.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:19 AM
1

It's expressly not, no. The complaint those people are making is that CRT is about laundering guilt along racial lines, and instilling a racial sense of entitlement among people of colour. Also they say that people who believe in CRT are unpatriotic anarchicsts that want to destroy the nation state, and usher in a neu world order. ...also that's the MO of hiw education works. It's why we still teach Nwtonian physics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:18 AM
2

EDIT: Okay I've read downthread that you meant that men should adopt same in-group bias. The thing is, it's rather unlikely to happen. It's biology. As true as it is there is ample precedent in that societies have adopted many patriarchal traits that are far in excess of what we need to get things done. Restricting the right to vote, preventing women from holding office, etc.. we dont need to do something so extreme, we just need to decide as the half of society to not let our weaker members fal…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:15 AM
2

also, as to you suggesting that men should sort of adopt an in-group bias (a propensity to side at least slightly in favor of other men, even strangers, to level things out a bit with how women tend to do the same).. Being a good person and getting societal progress done are incompatible with each other. That's not to say that we should adopt a hostile stance towards any one group, but if we were to stand in solidarity with one another things would get better. As it is now the burdens of society…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:11 AM
1

Because they're egocentrists. You're 100% right, and only a deluded fool would think otherwise. Hence: they are deluded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/23 08:02 AM
1

Don't say always. But yeah
/r/MensRights18/02/23 08:43 AM
1

Those are not prejudices but things which are happening today The battle cry of every racist ever
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/23 03:14 AM
2

Feminis. Is women, just like Israel is the Jews.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/23 03:10 AM
2

Yep. Perfectly summed up.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/23 03:09 AM
0

That's not true. The rest of this is wrong, but dude. Brewing. You literally brew beer in a couldron. And it's a potion.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/23 03:07 AM
3

'I can defend myself' isn't equal fights. Equal fights is if we can go around decking women like they do and expect no one to hit back.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 10:20 PM
7

More like suicide bomber.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 10:19 PM
1

Driving a Porsche should be considered aggravation.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 10:15 PM
1

Damned Dutchmen.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 10:15 PM
1

I'm starting to think you were just saying 'no, u' like a child and didn't actually have a point of any kind. Why dont you go and do something productive with your time instead of trolling some sub. You keep talking about how hypocritical people are here and how they don't actually care about this shit, why dont you take your own advice and try acting for feminism rather than trolling some internet board?
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 07:22 AM
-1

Yep I'm not sure I've ever voted for a man... I live in a parliamentary system country, so even though I've voted only for parties with male leaders, I've also only voted only for female representives.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 09:02 PM
1

Maybe.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 08:20 PM
-1

Whoever downvoted me is working for the hivemind.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 05:21 PM
3

But don't flip them too often they lose their juices.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 05:18 PM
3

I don't like sand
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 05:16 PM
1

No one ever does that. Don't be a turkey.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 08:37 AM
3

Leave pickles out of this.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 08:32 AM
5

Ironically this is what patriarchy theory says, but feminists don't read their own literature.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 08:23 AM
-2

Oh geez what a twist i thought this sub would be filled with manarchic genestealer patriarchs.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 08:22 AM
1

Explain.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 06:07 AM
1

How.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 10:37 PM
1

Projectingv much
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 08:27 PM
1

Imagine placing your contentment so thoroughly into the hands of others.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 11:59 PM
1

He admitted to it.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/22 08:13 AM
2

Abusers raise abusers. That's a tragedy.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/22 05:33 PM
1

Sarcasm isn't genuine. It's the opposite. And rude.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/22 06:20 PM
1

Yeah, and then I specified which part of your comment I took issue with. You can tell because it's part of the same paragraph as the 'not really'. And also it's topical. Also it's not insane.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/22 06:58 AM
1

I took the time to write you because I thought that you had a genuine interest in discussion. I'm disapointed to see that this was a mistake.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/22 06:39 AM
1

I'm pretty sure they do.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/22 06:33 AM
1

Where did I say that? Are you replying to the wrong comment?
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/22 06:30 AM
1

You were due for a correct response.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/22 06:29 AM
1

That's French, moron. Not an answer. This however is an example of irony. Because you complained about his not answering a question, and I pointed out that you have done the same. Further having pointed out the fact you attempt to distract rather than address the subject, furthering the irony. Trebly so ironic given your ignorance of the subject in the other thread. Quod erat demonstratum Superbia via inscientiae much?
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/22 06:15 AM
1

I'm sure you're right. Go ahead and explain it then.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/22 06:12 AM
1

It's only ironic if you didn't expect pushback when you wrote your first post, and if you didn't, you're pretty damned foolish. What would make it ironic is if he posted this comment to a thread where you were agreeing with him. But you're disagreeing with him which makes it definitively unironic, but rather prescriptive. That's not what ironic means. Irony means when something the oppite of the expected happens, basically, and if you didn't expect the same result from the same action that's not…
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/22 06:00 AM
1

They are rare, men are more likely to be raped by another man than to be falsely accused of rape. Show me statistics that prove the opposite. You asked how this was relevant, and he explained it... And I highly doubt feminists are the cause of man on man rape. It’s the same with terrorism and drugs. No one's accusing feminists of... causing the drug epidemic...? Are you high. Some of y’all say you don’t want to make it about gender but then you do. You've got a chip on your shoulder.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 07:42 AM
1

Not really. Before feminism women were blamed for being raped. In many countries they still are. Feminism has a current listen and believe who's that rewards this kind of misbehaviour. 'Believe all women' the current flavour of the month you're likely familiar with.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 07:34 AM
2

You writing this reply makes it not ironic.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 07:31 AM
1

Sees complaints about hatred of men is so narcissistic that this registers as misogyny I'm pretty sure most women aren't crazy bigots, misgynist.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 07:24 AM
2

False equivalence is not an argument. Et tu, brute
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 07:22 AM
2

You should read more. You should read at all. Start with the title.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 07:21 AM
1

Women like to shit on conservatives but it seems like they actually do have some conservative values, just only when they benefit from them. Yep. They're not left wing, they just want to reverse what they see as a patriarchal system into a matriarchy
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 07:06 AM
8

wouldn't it make sense that Feminism should be exterminated as an ideology just like the Nazis? Uh. We didn't do that. We let them match in the street and their a fit about nonsense that no one believes so everyone can see how pathetic they are.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 07:00 AM
1

Dude. Clearly not. Even if you want to say they're this ill intented that makes them partisans, not terrorists.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:58 AM
4

Your privilege is in the male. You'll need your man card to vote on the patriarchal elections so don't forget it.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:56 AM
2

I disagree. It's an oligarchy, not a democratic affair. That's why they turn on each other and form cliques.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:54 AM
3

TRADITION
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:52 AM
1

Feminism is narcissism because everything is about me.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:51 AM
5

Almost like it's a hate movement and they only want to attack the nearest male.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:50 AM
1

permeates all around us HURR DURR IT GO UP THE DOWN DURR
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:49 AM
19

Also they should have called it a 'sir charge'
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:46 AM
17

Yeah, I'd believe that. The idea is to stupid for them to care.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:45 AM
9

a pretty bohemiam suburb. I knew it was those fucking Czechs.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:43 AM
5

What a twist.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:42 AM
1

Yes it is. You are adding absurd elements to my argument to distort it and then attacking the distortion Then you're wasting your time with with a troll. Allow me to save you from that mistake. Good day.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 06:41 AM
2

You know this is a joke, right? That's not true. Both sexes tend to direct hatred into themselves. Hate always hurts the bearer more than their peers. Buddha says that holding onto resentment is like drinking poison, and expecting someone else to die.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 04:01 AM
1

Don't remind me about that ridiculous affair.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 03:54 AM
1

Feminist theories are I agree.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 03:48 AM
1

This is a straw man argument. It's not. And I really wish you would just look at the dictionary definition already, there is no definition that says fair means equal, you're probably misremembering that it says AS equals, not equally.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 03:48 AM
1

My preferred theory is that patriarchal societies formed organically over time and slowly changed previously matriarchal tribal societies into patriarchal ones. Most advanced mammals, especially smart ones, tend to live in matriarchal societies. The traditionally masculin spheres in human society weres externally facing ones like war and trade, which as society evolved became more important and in time reversed the originally female dominated tribes. Eventually trade and war were so important th…
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 03:43 AM
1

Valid theories Who said anything about validity.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 05:06 AM
1

Fair means to divide equally between people So dead people should get to vote? Tall people should get a step stool? People who are not having a heart attack should get defribillated as much as those who are? People below 18 should get as much old age insurance payment as people above 81? Fair dispensation of a venture's spoils is not commensurate with the investment of the parties, but equally? Logic is a branch of mathematics. Math is a branch of logic.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 05:04 AM
3

He is the gender neutral pronoun in English. That's why god is a He despite not having a physical form
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 05:01 AM
1

The point I was trying to make was that not all ‘feminism’ is bad... Yeah. I know. even though calling yourself ‘antifeminists’ might have indicated that you’re against all types of feminism Read the boilerplate literature of this reddit. You clearly haven't done this yet. Never comment on anything ever again without reading the basic description. No matter how explicite the name is or is not. Because you're going to make yourself look like a fool far too often if you dont... That's not to say I…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 09:50 PM
4

He's a troll. Ignore him.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 09:22 PM
3

This sounds like a you problem.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 09:22 PM
3

it’s not a conspiracy Okay, where is the ruling body of Manarchs? Is it democratic, oligarchic, or monarchical? How do we choose our leaders? What is the capital? Where is the constitution? When was the patriarchate formed? Just some basic questions. I'm sure you have some good literature to share on the government of patriarchy that was published on the subject, so whats a good textbook that was written by the patriarchy on the history of the patriarchate.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 09:17 PM
2

Hilarious. No you don't. Pakistan is a stratocracy. That's way worse than a patriarchy. China is a patriarchy. Pakistan isnt sophisticated enough to qualify as a patriarchy.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 09:10 PM
-1

Perhaps that’s true in your country. Which is what we're taking about. But here in Pakistan No one here is complaining about feminism in fucking Pakistan. Are you literally high. We're taking about first world feminists. We all fucking know you're probably going to get kidnapped by Tusken raiders. We're taking about Western, anglo, middleclass mostly white women in the first world. Pakistan. Jesus Christ.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 09:06 PM
1

How do you define "fair" without "equal"? Correctly. Fair means good. How, without the use of mathematics and scientific tools, does one determine if a proposition is true or false? Logic.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 09:00 PM
0

Feminist axioms are based in conspiracy theory rather than science Theories follow a pattern of logic, even if it's convoluted. This is fundementalism.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 08:57 PM
5

Classic narcissism.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 08:55 PM
7

Because she's a child who never grew out of that boys are gross phase and society doesnt smack the stupid out of women for that the way it does for men, and there's a cottage industry of hairy witches casting hate.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 08:55 PM
6

I'm betting on becomes serial killer.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 08:52 PM
8

It's a common suffix in names; I think it is a God though. Like Imhotep, who is also the name of the mummy in the mummy.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 08:45 PM
31

Imagine being so sure that you'd raise a rapist.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 08:43 PM
0

Except those people crimes have not been dismissed and you're wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 11:02 PM
0

Like Al Franken, Joe Biden, Cuomo, or Bill Clinton? Don't bring up partisan bullshit. We know they're all perverts.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/22 10:35 PM
11

ruinedforothermen
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/22 10:24 PM
2

Yeah I'm joking lol.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 06:38 AM
3

Translation: they think this is a team sport.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/22 06:17 PM
2

So what's an IED?
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/22 06:15 PM
2

Erotic discharge.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/22 06:15 PM
1

I think that this would be enough proof that they can't be first class citizens to remove their rights.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 06:50 PM
2

That's assuming the backlash isn't so overwhelming that women are permanently turned into second class citizens.... Not to say that's a good thing or that I hope that happens, but I think it would be a likely possibility. It's not going to happen because it's so insane that it would validate such an unfair reaction.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/22 08:31 AM
1

That’s ridiculous. It's ridiculous because it's a joke. Now get your sense of humour adjusted before you kill yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/22 08:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter