TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

u443 Archive

View 16 posts and 80 comments by u443 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
72

u443/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 10:36 PM
42

Discussionu443/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 07:03 AM
35

u443/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 02:32 AM
32

Discussionu443/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 09:08 AM
19

Question For Womenu443/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:26 AM
17

u443/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:48 AM
14

Discussionu443/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 08:30 AM
9

Discussionu443/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 03:44 AM
9

CMVu443/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 06:08 PM
5

CMVu443/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 08:56 AM
5

Discussionu443/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 06:57 AM
2

u443/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 02:48 AM
2

u443/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 08:55 AM
1

u443/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 05:48 AM
1

u443/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 09:41 AM
1

u443/r/askTRP20/04/19 11:00 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

I like the money and sex analogy, it makes sense to me. I believe data is clear that the rate of increase in happiness with the amount of money you make decreases the more money you make, and it shows that you can actually attain most of happiness with a lot less money than people may believe. I’m thinking we might see the same results if we study the n-count. However, after some point, it no longer about happiness and more about power and domination. Some people strive to be the most powerful i…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:58 PM
1

Smaller hips? That’s strange. I mean smaller waist yes. I am not even sure how smaller hips can get, seems very dependent on bone structure, but I love hips (not Kim Kardashian big though).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 12:16 PM
3

From my experience, Asian men like their women to look like preadolescent girls, skinny, no curves, and super pale. I’ve met Asian women who had perfect bodies (maybe were lacking some ass or breasts), but who told me they’re considered large in their home countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 10:28 AM
4

Hourglass doesn’t mean fat. A true linear or rectangular body isn’t attractive, however, somewhere in the middle between linear and medium hourglass build, would probably be very attractive to most men. I generally would find your body type to be attractive, hourglass, not linear, but not fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 10:17 AM
1

Weight and body fat percentage depend too on factors other than starving yourself, mainly genetics such as body frame, body fat set point, metabolism, etc. Not every woman is cut out to be skinny with little fat. Also, body proportions, structure, and fat distribution are far more important, at least to me, compared to just “skinny”. Hourglass figure and a good ass and set of breasts are the first things I look at. I also don’t like thick ankles or calves, probably the first thing I notice on a …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 10:11 AM
6

I think he meant to say that you grew up used to being treated poorly by women, and you don’t actually find that behavior very unacceptable. You would go back or stay with them, the same way you would go back to your mom when you were young while she wasn’t treating you properly. He can correct me if I’m wrong. Also, I’m not sure if you explicitly said that your mom treated you poorly, but that’s my take. But I relate to this very much. This is exactly how my relationship with my mother was. I t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 07:41 AM
2

Yeah I realized after posting my comment that I didn’t actually address your point regarding my description of Blue Pillers as naive. From my understanding, a Blue Pill man does not believe in the Red Pill description of the opportunistic nature of how women base their connections to men. Hence, a Blue Pill man believes a woman can love him the way he wants her to. Doesn’t this make a Blue Pill man naive?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 06:51 AM
1

Doesn’t this make you the courageous type discussed in my OP? You’ve been burned before and know that the game can be dirty. But you’re courageous enough and willing to take the risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 06:39 AM
1

If you’re naive, you are not aware of the possible dangers you’re putting yourself through. Hence, by definition, you don’t need courage, because there is nothing fearful ahead of you. So you can’t be naive and courageous at the same time. Courage here is in the context of trusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 03:23 AM
1

Why do you ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 03:03 AM
13

Dude, you sure have seen more than enough of the dark side of female nature. You’d be a great guy to grab a drink with and talk about this shit! I hope you aren’t making this shit up though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 03:02 AM
4

Didn’t swallow the pill, but became aware of it recently after it blew up over the internet, and since then things started to fall into place and I was able to understand female behavior better. What made me accept some of the red pill truths? Being strung along by a girl for the sole reason of getting married before she hits the wall, then she dumps me for a higher value guy while we were talking about marriage plans. Used by different girls for short term flings, as a temporary fix, before the…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 02:22 AM
2

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 09:35 PM
1

I should’ve been more clear about what I meant by Red Pillers. I was talking about the people who are redpilled through life experiences, and are either stuck in the anger phase or are too afraid of building meaningful connections with women. I don’t care about the people who have never experienced life or never been burned before who spread nonsense over the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 09:33 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 09:30 PM
1

Naive and cynical would be someone who knows that they shouldn’t trust easily, but they’re just too passive and laid back to analyze and act according to whatever input or information they’re receiving. Though they might be cynical within, their actions and decisions are naive. From a practical stand point, they’re still naive. What do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 09:24 PM
1

If you’re still very trusting, and more blindly than otherwise, and you notice that people can easily take advantage of you, then don’t you think that makes you naive in a way? I would think that some people are more wired to be naive no matter how hard they try not to be, as it is more of a passive laid back approach to handling interactions. What do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 09:18 PM
13

Depending on your intentions. If your goal is to get with the girl, and you’re doing them favors to achieve that, yes, that can be “beta”. Otherwise, you just treat them no differently than a male friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 02:29 PM
1

Depending on your intentions. If your goal is to get with this girl, and you’re doing them favors to achieve that, yes, that can be “beta”. Otherwise, you just treat them no differently than a male friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 02:29 PM
5

If your trust is based on taking a calculated risk, meaning not just trusting anyone, are aware of red flags or manipulation, then I would say you fall under the courageous but cynical person? Which in my opinion is better than naive or cynical but fearful of trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 09:21 AM
6

Crocodile tears. Being overly nice or sexual teasing to get away with things. Playing the victim card based on your gender. Basically, using femininity for manipulation. It is harder to envision because women are thought of as the weaker gender. They’re assumed to be the victim until proven otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 04:49 AM
1

Blue pill
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 01:47 AM
2

High n-count could be a sign of insecurity or a sign of high sex drive, or a combination of the two. If high n-count is due to insecurity, then the woman would place unhealthy emphasis on the physical traits of her partners rather than other things such as personality, career, intelligence, etc. This has been my observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 01:47 AM
2

That’s why I said “generally”. But it’s like how a poor person would want to buy an expensive car to show off because of underlying insecurities, and not necessarily because they like how the car drives. When rich people buy an expensive car, it is because they enjoy it, otherwise they don’t buy it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 10:24 PM
5

High n-count women are generally more fun to be around. You can talk with them like they’re one of your boys. In terms of sex, I don’t find them to be that much better, it really depends on her personality. Their negative side is that they can be manipulative, and their relationships are more based on a list of things they’re looking for, generally to validate them and their self-esteem, rather than building a connection. High n-count men can be better at sex because men are expected to lead the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 08:23 PM
2

As a man with a bachelor’s degree, I much prefer a woman who has good education and a clear career path. That’s what I was exclusively looking for when I was on the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 07:13 PM
1

But by your same logic, you don’t care if the guy you don’t like, gets hurt when you pump and dump him, you only care if it happens to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 10:41 PM
2

Not all girls that have ONSs are the same. Some do it much more frequently than others, some do it within minutes of meeting a guy, some don’t ask for condoms, some are attention deprived, some are manipulative, some are cheating on their bfs, etc. You have to judge her character to figure out where to draw the line. I’m guessing that you haven’t had ONSs before. But if the number of ONSs is high, that is generally not a good sign.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 06:42 PM
4

Or maybe just take an outside perspective even from female friends. I’ve always ignored my friends advices and more times than not they were right. Sometimes, when we are into someone, we ignore the red flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 03:59 AM
3

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 03:56 AM
2

I just read your entire post. Find a guy who isn’t interested in traditional ideals. I’m one of those guys. I put my and my SO’s goals and happiness above any of the traditional ideals like having kids or buying a house.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 03:43 AM
11

You’re right, but that’s what happened with the girl I dated after college. I pushed her and helped her get a good job, and before you know it, she was gone. I can’t generalize, but that was my experience. With my current girlfriend, I just don’t waste my time and energy on pushing her to be more successful. I focus on my success, and whatever she decides to do is up to her, if she is content with her situation, I let her be. I’m not sure how relevant this is to your post, I only read the title,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 03:29 AM
17

Been there, done that (with a girlfriend though). Terrible idea. You push her and support her to make something useful of herself, then once she gets closer to your level of success, she’s gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 03:13 AM
2

The seriousness of a relationship should be more related to things such as the depth of the connection, the length of the relationship, the experiences shared, being close to the important people in each other’s lives, etc. I don’t see why signing some paperwork would take a person from “just someone I’m dating” to suddenly they’re my soulmate and now I should put more effort to make things work. I find this strange to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:44 PM
2

I’m not an expert on this matter. But I can speak from my personal experience with depression. If you struggle with depression, are aware of it, and have battled with it for any significant amount of time, you start to develop an intuition for when a depression episode is about to end.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 09:11 AM
3

I can definitely see how mental illness can cause a lot of issues for a man in maintaining interest or attraction from women. A man struggling with depression can only hide it or control it until he cannot. He won’t have strong control over his emotions, and he will eventually act more “beta” than is acceptable for maintaining attraction. I think someone with depression or other mental illnesses shouldn’t be on the dating market until they get their mental health under control.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 08:47 AM
3

Still 26 here, will report back in 20 years. On a more serious note. My sister is getting more and more insecure about her looks with age, she is 32 now. That’s the bad side of aging, but the good side is that she became more chill with age. I feel older people know how to have a good time and not sweat the small stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:11 PM
2

I made a similar post to this recently saying that not everyone can transform themselves into ”Alpha”. This includes physically and mentally. Physically, anyone who is into fitness, knows the limitations set by your genetic makeup in how muscular you can get, the body fat percentage you can comfortably maintain, and your body structure and shape. Not everyone is cut out to have that Alpha thick muscular V-shaped body, with wide clavicles and small hips/waist and abs (without steroids). There is …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 04:38 AM
1

So you’re asking me, an online stranger, to prove something about my life? How do you want me to prove it? By telling you about my cringy stories of deep depression and endless nights of alcohol and tears? I only heard about the red pill very recently, like a couple of months ago. I don’t believe in many of their ideas, mainly because they’re extreme. Having said that, I do believe that laying out the extreme ends, “Blue Pill” and “Red Pill”, allows for a better discussion. I do agree, however, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 07:36 PM
4

Women should be the ones held responsible for child support. They have more birth control options, and they get to choose whether to go through with abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 10:23 AM
5

Women can get attention from family and friends. No one wants to listen to a man talk about his struggles, maybe friends can tolerate listening to him but only for very short periods of time, but definitely not family. There is a reason why men prefer to keep to themselves, because when they try to open up, it only backfires. Many times, people don’t forget your weak moments as a man, they’ll always bring it up against you in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 08:44 PM
1

Depends on the people involved. A lot of women prefer to communicate indirectly, could be due to their lack of assertiveness. With experience, men learn how to pick up on cues. I much prefer women that communicate directly, but these women are in the minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 08:36 PM
1

Good point and it was brought up by someone else too, that BB dynamic is not limited to money, and a more general term should be used instead, where the bucks part would only be one dimension among several others.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:17 AM
2

You could be poor if you had an SMV much higher than hers, and she wouldn’t mind supporting you financially just to have access to quality sex. But in this case you’d have to accept dating someone that is not sexually attractive to you. She would be the BB in this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:12 AM
1

Good point. My suggested solution might only help the man avoid the beta bucks scenario. I guess calling it beta comfort would be better, and beta bucks would be just one of the several aspects that fall under beta comfort.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:08 AM
4

Your answer confirms my view, doesn’t it? You would only consider dating a beta if he makes more than you. So if he chooses women that make close to or more than what he makes, he then avoids girls that consider him beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:02 AM
1

Your answer confirms my view, doesn’t it? You would date a beta if he makes more than you. For him to void this situation, he shouldn’t date you, or someone that makes a lot less than him.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:31 AM
1

Well your answers confirms my view, doesn’t it? You would only date beta if he made more than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:29 AM
1

Well that confirms my view, doesn’t it? That if he is beta you wouldn’t date him if he made less than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:12 AM
1

Your answer confirms my view. You’d date him if he made more than you but he’s otherwise beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:01 AM
1

Your answer confirms my view. You’d date him if he made more than you but he’s otherwise beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:59 AM
1

Your answer confirms my view. You’d date him if he made more than you but he’s otherwise beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:57 AM
1

Your answer confirms my view. You’d date him if he made more than you but he’s otherwise beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:56 AM
1

Your answer confirms my view. You’d date him if he made more than you but he’s otherwise beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:54 AM
1

Your answer confirms my view. You’d date him if he made more than you but he’s otherwise beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:52 AM
1

So you’d date him if he makes more than you but he’s otherwise beta. Exactly confirms my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:50 AM
1

You could. If your SMV is much higher than the woman, she may still support you financially, just to have access to quality sex. Though, it’s not a likely situation, since you’d have to be a woman of average and below in looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:45 AM
1

You could. If your SMV is much higher than the woman, she may still support you financially, just to have access to quality sex. Though, it’s not a likely situation, since you’d have to be a woman of average and below in looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:44 AM
1

You could. If your SMV is much higher than the woman, she may still support you financially, just to have access to quality sex. Though, it’s not a likely situation, since you’d have to be a woman of average and below in looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:44 AM
1

You could. If your SMV is much higher than the woman, she may still support you financially, just to have access to quality sex. Though, it’s not a likely situation, since you’d have to be a woman of average and below in looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:44 AM
1

You could. If your SMV is much higher than the woman, she may still support you financially, just to have access to quality sex. Though, it’s not a likely situation, since you’d have to be a woman of average and below in looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:43 AM
1

You could. If your SMV is much higher than the woman, she may still support you financially, just to have access to quality sex. Though, it’s not a likely situation, since you’d have to be a woman of average and below in looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:43 AM
1

I don’t understand your point? Being at peace with who you are improves your mental health state, and that could actually dramatically improve your dating life, instead of lurking on Reddit subs asking whether I appeared with a girl the day before as alpha or beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 04:23 PM
1

Sprinters compared to other sports, have on average very high mesomorphy, they’re some of the most mesomorphic sports. Also, you have to look at whole package. They could be slightly faster than pure mesomorphs, but not necessarily stronger. You could still be very high in mesomorphy and have little ectomorphic or endomorphic traits as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 04:02 PM
1

Depends on how you define alpha female. But I would say, physically, has an hour glass figure, relatively large breasts and ass. Mentally, possess similar personality traits to those of the alpha male, though manifested in a feminine behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 03:39 PM
1

At least in the US, generally, manly = attractive. The word mesomorphic is synonymous to the word athletic, the words are often used interchangeably. The more you deviate from a mesomorphic built, meaning the skinnier and/or fatter you are, the weaker, slower and less athletic you are. The reason you see a lot of sports with more ectomorphic slender builds like basketball, tennis or soccer for example, is because these sports are dependent more on skill (and sometimes height) and not necessarily…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 03:33 PM
1

The common theme between the two lies is that they don’t want both men and women to engage in casual sex. However, all the woman has to do to have casual sex is to learn how to keep her sex life secret from the opposite sex as much as possible, which is what a lot of women have mastered as a skill. Watch how women talk about their sex lives when other men are around, and watch how they talk behind closed doors. For a man to engage in casual sex, he has to reprogram his brain, as his approach is …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 07:09 AM
2

Moon lands on man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 06:47 AM
1

The bar keeps getting set higher and higher with time in both the job market and the sexual market. I’m guessing this probably explains a lot of the increase in mental health problems and the decreased amount of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 10:12 PM
1

Well I take care of myself, but I’ve always been a tall lanky guy. I’ve been working out for a long time now but my body just isn’t designed to build any substantial amount of muscle or strength as compared to some of my friends for example. At least, I can maintain a low body fat. But that’s for another discussion. My question was actually more about the attractiveness of the face, as from my understanding the red pill ranks facial attractiveness very high on the SMV scale. Does the red pill be…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 09:09 PM
2

How about physical attractiveness? I’m in my mid twenties now. Assuming my status/resources remain the same, does physical attractiveness increase from here, according to the red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 04:58 PM
1

For example, after a bad breakup in high school, I decided to be single in college and “play the field”. I would hook up with girls from time to time, but they were not necessarily always the hottest. I might have ticked the pre-selection box for some girls but not for others, depending on the quality of girls I was getting with when playing the field.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 12:48 PM
3

I meant that the man would not commit to a girl because he thinks he can do better, so keeps on playing the field, but he finds out later down the road that this girl was actually the best he could do, but by then it is too late. Doesn’t the quality of women the guy is playing the field factor into the pre-selection box?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 04:39 AM
4

This is a good answer I must say, especially how men and women can be similar in what they want, but the order of priorities can differ. One more thing, and I know you were talking in general terms, in the case where the woman has a good career and makes good money, can the order of her priorities shift? Would she place more value on the quality of sex rather than resources?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 04:16 AM
11

I’ve never heard of the red pill until the last month or two since it blew up over the internet. I’m still trying to understand what those people are getting at. The only merit I see in trp is that it helps men, especially those of lower SMV, little experience, or weaker personalities, be more careful of the true intentions of the woman they are in a relationship with. All the other crap the trp people talk about I just don’t get, they generalize everything. I agree with your view. Girls who are…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 01:43 PM
8

Depends on the man’s age. I can’t speak for men in their 30s, as I am only 26. But from what I have seen and from what I hear from my older friends, men in their thirties have a preference for women around 4-8 years younger than them. So I’m guessing there should be no problem with attracting 35+ men. If you look young for your age, there should be no problem attracting guys around your age or even a year or two younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 08:31 PM
1

I’m not exactly sure what you guys mean by “love”. I thought we’ve all been through enough to understand that dating is a game based on SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 11:16 PM
1

I’m not sure if it is the same everywhere, I’ve never lived outside the US, but I’m in my mid twenties and I’ve seen dating become more and more mechanical, talking in general terms here. I just see girls compete among each other for who gets the man of highest SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 10:43 PM
1

For whatever reason, according to trp, one of the most important factors in assessing a woman’s relationship value is in how frequently she engages in casual sex. Personally, I don’t care about the past, though I care about how careless she is about it, like if she isn’t selective with who she sleeps with, careless about STDs, she is a selfish and a manipulative player, cheats etc.. Back to the topic of discussion. I’ve seen AF and BB relationships many times in real life so I cannot say that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 07:32 PM
2

Even as a man, sex with someone I’m emotionally connected to is so much better. If I try to reason as to why that is, I think it is because of all the sexual build up that is taking place all the time. When you are horny, you’re thinking about the next time you’re going to have sex with them. If it is just a FWB, you feel guilty thinking about them. In addition, you don’t have to worry about what they like and what they don’t like in bed, stds, or whether the sex is going to be good, etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 07:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter