TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

uberpower Archive

View 1 posts and 202 comments by uberpower on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

uberpower/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

He went anti-feminist. May as well write a KKK screed. He could get fired, expelled, ostracized, brigade-shamed online, have false accusations made against him, be arrested, lose custody, be raped in prison, AIDS, and death. Hey . . . . it's only a slight exaggeration.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:16 PM
84

He names them, they name him, he has his life ruined by feminists and those living in fear of public feminist disapproval.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:38 PM
2

Or they could just date her, works out the same. Dinner, movie, flowers, chocolate, cabfares, gasoline, etc. All men's "responsibility".
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:49 PM
1

Cool. Didn't even know it existed
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:50 PM
1

It's just a story. Seemed like a story MRA might appreciate.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:53 PM
2

There's a few billion men in the world. You don't need female friends. Your female relatives can be your female friends. Mom, sister, daughter, aunt, cousin, that's all safe. Or should be safe unless you're a moron. If you're a moron, stay home and stick to reddit.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:41 PM
2

Think about how brainwashed the average reddit feminist lurker is, then add 'active poster' to that personality, then take it the mod level. Were you really expecting a rationally justifiable ban?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:48 PM
3

So if an equally drunk man and woman have casual sex, the man could be convicted of being a rapist, forced to pay for the resulting baby for 18 years, likely lose his job or be expelled from university, live life as a registered sex offender, and face possible civil damages as well, right? . . . Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:00 PM
77

rewards are the consequences for lying about rape in our anti-male society.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:46 PM
75

Sure for her. She'll keep herself in the news and increase the odds of getting a ghost written book deal, a movie deal, paid appearances, all sorts of good stuff. Consequences.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:37 PM
-2

Brute strength is an advantage though. An immigrant coworker from a few jobs ago recommended that I beat my wife when I complained to him that she does little at home and earns no money. He told me the tale of how his wife wouldn't iron his t-shirts because she thought hanging them was enough, so he beat her. She called her family, and her dad came over, and he beat him, and then her brother came over, and he beat the brother too. Now all his t-shirts are ironed. I would of course never follow h…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:07 PM
1

You're right.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:06 PM
18

People need to mind their own business and have the sense to not put photos of strangers with wild accusations on the internet. The mom is the creep here . . . the severe creep. But because they don't (mind their own business), the sad reality for men is that men need to not take certain photos or selfies or videos, and not speak to kids. I'm serious. One misstep could cost you everything - job, employability, family, friends, everything. As usual, this incident is driven by a political agenda t…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:03 PM
0

If you earn, they will take your sperm from their mouths, asses, tits, hands, breasts, condoms, pubic hair, wadded up tissue, towels, etc, and they'll lie about being on birth control, and you'll be on the hook for their beauty parlor visits and restaurant food for 18 years.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:55 PM
-4

Feels > reals. Experience/interpretation > reality. Emotion > logic. Isolated incidents > statistics. These are not just women's rights, these are the basis of all (particularly left wing) politics in the USA.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:45 PM
2

My ancestors fought and died to free slaves, and my other ancestors were the first people to go to Africa for the non-conquering non-religious purposes of medical assistance and education. But I'm white male so I'm eeeeeeeeeevil
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:51 PM
9

Exactly the same cries of sexism that feminists and the left hurled around whenever Palin was criticized. Wait
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:31 PM
3

No I broke her in and now she's a good mom working at home on social media and giving me most of the earnings to manage our finances with. Not sure if it's the right move but she's a kickass mama who lets me manage all the money and raises good little children so . . . . I gave her another chance and it worked out for us. She just had those bad three months where she was unacceptable. We never cheated on each other, we never abused each other, we know each other for very long (friends before mar…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:04 PM
2

That's the way. I get at least 2% cashback on all my credit cards, never pay interest or fees, always pay in full each month . . . sometimes the cashback is 5% - 10%. Can't beat free money. That's how savings accumulate for rainy days.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:59 PM
10

I'm 41, have never balanced squat, and have an 800+ FICO score (that's an elite credit rating). Just pay your shit on time (autopay of full balance due is great) and earn more than you spend.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:30 PM
88

There was a brief period in our marriage when my wife earned more than me. Three months to be exact. I was initially very proud of her then . . . you should have seen the attitude that came with it: totally dismissive of everything I said, entirely stopped doing her half of the chores, never shared any of that money with me or for our bills . . . she lost that job quickly, lied about still having it, cried and begged and brought in her brother to argue on her behalf because I told her to move ou…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:06 PM
2

Duly noted, sir!
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:03 PM
3

SJW aren't about eliminating hate. They're about justifying it.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:22 PM
14

I see you're looking at history as taught by liberal American schools & colleges circa 2015. That ignores and warps history to a point of view which suits the political agenda of the American left. Unadulterated history shows that almost all races treat almost all other races poorly and with hatred.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:20 PM
20

The two political parties have brainwashed their members into voting for the "lesser" evil. It's nice to be a duopoly.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:51 PM
8

Everything that Obama's been doing lately is to goad his opponents into being portrayed as anti-woman or anti-minority or anti-poor or anti-vacc or anti-education or anti-children or anti-environment etc. This is to rile up his ignorant base for 2016 when his party can retake the Senate and keep the Presidency. So when he cuts funding for men's cancer and MRAs (who are villains to the left in case you're unaware) complain, his water carriers in the non-Fox media (over 80% of whom are Democrats) …
/r/MensRights09/02/15 03:38 PM
1

Correction: We already never hear the end of it, because even though more women try suicide, more men succeed at it. It's all about . . . stop me if you've heard this before . . . the Cry For Help.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:31 PM
1

When I think of subway seats being overused, other than myself and other thicker men, I think of black women. They seem to be the reliably fattest group on the Queens & Brooklyn subway lines. They don't need to manspread; they fat spread.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:43 PM
5

"Sure." And then I'd relax my legs after you sat. Hasn't been a problem yet.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:45 PM
6

I manspread today, as I do every day, because I have tree trunk legs which point outwards naturally, and pointing them inwards or straight ahead for one hour on the subway is a painful stress position. I get looks, but no confrontations yet over the past 25 years. Maybe some will happen soon.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:30 PM
10

I'm pretty sure it'll remain "all the rage" among most of the people who want it to.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:38 PM
2

I attended a Montessori in the early 80's where a male teacher who loved to hug students was outed as gay and had to leave the school. AFAIK he never hurt anyone, and the kids were sad. He was a favorite teacher.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 11:57 PM
1

To bring it all together, I definitely wouldn't trust an employed black emotionally unstable transvestite thief around my young child
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:54 PM
6

Instead of downvoting you, I'll show you how I tie it into American political liberalism, and you tell if I'm wrong and why: For the left, truth or lies in a rape claim are irrelevant. They are on a crusade to turn every rape claim into a rape fact, unless it's one of them that's accused. The victim's always right, unless the accused is Bill Clinton or other prominent Democrat. If the accused is a rightwinger and the victim a left wing crusader, why even bother with facts? That's all you need to…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:52 PM
10

55 uses of the pronoun "I" . . . that encapsulates her self-absorbed spoiled liberal brat world view perfectly.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:13 PM
7

Dear young fellas: You're gonna have to audiovisually record expressed unquestionable consent given at the same time as drug & alcohol tests are administered by a licensed physician and a contract is signed in the presence of the potential victim's lawyer, the entire event notarized and witnessed by two sober female adult acquaintances of the potential victim, all before you can go to second base. And it will still be questioned in court. And you will still be expelled from school . . . if these…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:07 PM
20

Id don't give a fuck if my video game is written by a GLBTQBT pre-op second sex change multiple gender triple breasted double cocked tweeter from HuffPo. Which is what I assume they hire there.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:15 PM
2

Letting your woman go unaccompanied through certain parts of NYC is dangerous. Source: 37 years in NYC and much sadness
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:04 PM
22

Drunken women: It's your fault. Sober women: It's your fault. Coworker women: It's your fault.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:17 PM
7

I'm sure that everyone who she writes for will instantly fire her, just like they would if a man had written this about women.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:10 PM
0

I control-F'd for "ghetto", did not find it on this page. The answer is : Ghetto
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:06 PM
11

Feminists want more of the money & power. They want to be paid more, control more assets, hold more political offices, be more top executives, etc (all these things having been cited as "patriarchy" evidence). Men's rights activists want equal rights with children in divorce court, equal rights with registration for the draft, equal punishments for equal crimes, equal rights with deciding whether or not to be a parent once the woman is pregnant, equal protection against domestic abuse, equal tre…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:26 PM
1

They take their clue from Democrats. If you disagree with Democrats, you are literally worthy of hate, scorn, anger, intolerance, rudeness, unfriending, downvoting, mockery, etc. Because if you disagree, you are self-evidently evil or controlled by evil.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:28 PM
1

First it's the fathers that are separated from children by the state, then the mothers, and then children simply belong to the state.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:03 PM
-2

Lots of prostitutes are batshit crazy or depressed or selling their bodies against their will or desperate & unhappy. I haven't even mentioned pimps or dirty cops or violent customers. Some families experience stress or divorce due to men using prostitutes. That said it should still probably be legal and regulated with frequent STD checks and safety measures etc.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 07:48 PM
3

Let's see, is there an important election coming up? Yes there is. This is 100% part of that. This is a Democrat reminding other Democrats that there is a war on women, and she doesn't even have to state which party is conducting that war because everyone "knows" it's Republicans. The American left is transparent once you get to know them.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 08:19 PM
1

I love my baby girl so much that I well up with tears. Down with selfish family-destroying feminism, up with loving families.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:04 PM
2

heheh. I've made my point.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:56 PM
-4

I'm content to disagree and move forward. I can't win when a circumcision is, in your world, equal to amputation and breast removal and genital mutilation and baby torture and male rights destruction. Go argue with some uncircumcised males who have penile cancer.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 11:04 PM
-9

I'm as anti-feminist as they come, particularly the breed of feminism which wants more rights for women than men have, and I also hate/oppose those feminists who hate MRA's, and I also despise those feminists who are unwilling to give up special rights (no military draft, courts favoring moms over dads, lesser punishments for violent crimes done by women, etc, the whole list). Anyway, I really thought that female genital mutilation meant clitoris removal . . . oh wait, it often does. So fuck off…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 08:56 PM
-9

Obviously I prefer my anecdotal evidence, aka my whole life experience since I was circumcised at age 13, to your opinion. I admit personal bias :) I have no problems with penetration because I do the work to make sure my woman is lubricated before I go in. I did occasionally, during periods of having long sex sessions over several consecutive days, have the "yanking of the shaft skin issue" which you describe. Now that I'm older and have a family, there's no time for such activity, and little d…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 08:46 PM
-4

I could see how a little extra flesh might bump a gspot better or provide more sensation during penetration or shallow thrusting. However if I were to describe the successes I've had bringing women to squirting ecstasy, it would sound like false bragging . . . so I don't feel like like my women (just one woman now for a long time) are missing out. But maybe my job would be easier without the circumcision, because it is tiring, back-breaking work doing it right.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:56 PM
-4

I cannot imagine being more sensitive ("feeling more awesome") than I am, though I concede it's possible.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:32 PM
1

You're correct.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:13 PM
-11

I'm 41 and very sensitive and never died of penile cancer or caught an STD or had a penis issue, so it's working for me, and every woman I've ever been with has had no complaints. Removing a tiny bit of unnecessary foreskin to reduce disease risk is not comparable to removing a breast because breasts feed babies. Also, removing foreskin is not comparable to removing a clitoris because that would be more comparable to removing the entire head of the penis. 15 square inches? Maybe 1.5 you meant? C…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:31 PM
-10

Just off the top of my head, both having a baby and raising a baby are far more important to a baby's life than circumcision, which is nearly irrelevant except that some diseases are prevented and perhaps some sensitivity is lost (believe me, it's still plenty sensitive). And yet govt doesn't require licenses for pregnancy or child raising, so, circumcision is pretty far down the list of things that the govt needs to butt into.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:52 PM
0

Your understanding of words and logic is not good. But that's OK, I'm accustomed to that from those who disagree with me.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 05:53 PM
0

How trolls argue: Like you. Attack your opponent not his substance, attack his source not its data and conclusions, learn nothing, be glad.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 05:41 PM
0

Since the research says men are 50% more fatal per mile driven than women are, my work of arguing with idiots is done for the moment. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:24 PM
0

http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:18 PM
1

http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf
/r/MensRights17/09/14 12:48 AM
1

My observations led to my question of are men more fatal than women behind the wheel? The answer is overwhelmingly yes, yes they are: Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a f…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:28 PM
0

And yet I'm correct and you're not. Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a fatal accident. However, the difference in the fatal rate between men and women was most extreme am…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:27 PM
1

And yet men are 50% more likely to be in a fatal accident than women per mile driven. Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a fatal accident. However, the difference in the fa…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:27 PM
1

It's a shame that you're wrong and my question was valid. Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a fatal accident. However, the difference in the fatal rate between men and wom…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:26 PM
-1

Did they cause fatal accidents? Because men sure do: Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a fatal accident. However, the difference in the fatal rate between men and women wa…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:25 PM
1

And yet somehow the question I raised is completely valid and my suspicions were correct: Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a fatal accident. However, the difference in th…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:25 PM
0

Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a fatal accident. However, the difference in the fatal rate between men and women was most extreme among the younger age groups, and by a…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:25 PM
1

You're not forgiven for your misunderstandings and poor attitude. And I've answered my pertinent question on my own: Men are 50% more likely to die per mile driven than women are. So yes, men are more fatal behind the wheel than women. Source: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/1007/83596.0001.001.pdf: Gender-related differences were observed in the 1990 accident involvement rates. Per mile driven, men had about 1.5 times the risk of women of experiencing a fatal accident. Ho…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:24 PM
1

No because a sample size of 200 is not anecdotal, and I've not identified poor arguments or fallacies, and because I've outlined why my criticism is correct whereas co_radio is incorrect (so I've not directed empty mathematically ludicrous criticism at him the way he did at me). So, all innocent. Bro, do you even argue?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:06 PM
1

No, because none of what you mentioned involved crazy fast drivers on highways blowing by everyone at 40+MPH over the speed limit. Also No because my sample size of 200 is not anecdotal; it is representative with the only selection bias being mostly eastern & northern NY. Edit: Other selection biases: I've done 99% of my highway driving between 5AM and midnight, and . . . ? Help me identify some.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:02 PM
-1

Your understanding of statistics has a margin of error of simply being completely wrong without question. My sample size of roughly 200 randomly selected crazy fast speeding drivers where 199 were male (or unidentifiable) and one was female has a less a far less than 1% chance of NOT being representative of crazy fast drivers in the state. But carry on, math genius. Don't let me deter you. There is a less than 100% chance that I'm correct, so your less than 1% chance of being correct could yet t…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:06 PM
-4

My personal anecdotes are indicative of what's happening in NY state, where my sample size is large enough to be indicative of which sex is driving extra crazy fast most often.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 06:20 PM
0

Male driver checking in with a perhaps unpopular thought: When a maniac passes me on the highway doing 40+ MPH over the speed limit in his sports car / import / motorcycle / police cruiser, that maniac is most frequently male, like 9 times out of ten or more. I can actually recall just one woman in 20 years of driving (mostly in NY) who I've seen do that. Are men's vehicle accidents more deadly than women's accidents? Just based on my experience, that's what I'd expect. Edit: Answering my own qu…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 05:18 PM
8

You may only talk about RAPE-rape if it's a female being raped. So for females, all rape is rape. If the "victim" goes on a Saturday night date and has a good time and texts her friends that she's going to take the guy home and they have sex in her bed and she has not a single hint of violent marks on her and she wasn't inebriated and she doesn't call the cops and he peacefully leaves her place and goes home, but the next day she decides she was raped, then that's RAPE. There is no difference be…
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:01 AM
0

So the question is, are men in richer countries getting better at faking their own deaths in order to avoid court-mandated payments to lying she-devils, or are western women getting better at making their murders of men look like suicides? /s
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:12 PM
1

I'm unwilling to pretend that women advanced civilization even 1/10th as much as men did. It's more like 1/100th. You're right in that I'm not being helpful, just realistic.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:39 PM
0

Advancements in home / baby care over the millennia: Incremental, almost none. Advancements in everything men did: Millions of percent. Reading, writing math, architecture, civil engineering, ships, locomotion, the internet, whatever . . . all 99% men. Why do you put zero weight to actually advancing civilization?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:33 PM
0

OK, what percentage of credit goes to the women who raise the next generation and tend home?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:42 PM
-5

So what percent of the credit goes to the men who were in charge 99% of the time and did all the heavy lifting and comprised 99% of scholars for the first few millennia of history?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:32 PM
13

Which is why all of civilization was built by men.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:08 PM
12

He alleges that "a rape kit examination, security camera footage, and witnesses’ accounts, were dismissed from the hearing as “irrelevant.”" If that's true, it's reason No. 6523 that I don't want my kids to be subject to 'education' by a system that's run by batshit ideologues. Are we seriously supposed to shell out hundreds of thousands of dollars for this?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 07:23 PM
45

In NYC, a teacher can do anything she wants in a public school, and have a job forever.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:35 PM
3

Retain a lawyer; plan for bankruptcy; record her online activity if possible.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 03:34 PM
6

No, he must apologize for his groin getting in the way of her attacking fist. Also, he just raped her, and that's not funny. Now he's a cultural rapist. /s
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:41 PM
0

I was circumcised at 13. Hurt for a couple days, then all good. AMA
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:45 PM
2

Bill Maher's a funny genius and a total fucking asshole who takes 90% of his marching orders from the party he donated a million dollars to because Mitt Romney is too rich or white or evil or something. As a result of his flaming partisanship, Maher has blinders on to many realities, and there's nothing to be done about it. That's how partisans roll - they only believe the lies of their side.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:27 PM
14

Because women know that they're allowed to hit, and men aren't allowed to hit back, not even with a weaker hit than the woman landed. Equality!
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:38 PM
53

AbortRapists AllTouchIsRape BeingMaleIsRape
/r/MensRights20/06/14 03:18 PM
11

If they do care, they'll go out of their way to dig up any dirt that ever existed on this father, and make a story warning about the dangers of giving males medical records.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:53 PM
3

A boy becomes a man when he takes charge of his life, not when women's actions dictate his own. A man doesn't go from obeying Mom, who is a legitimate source of authority, to kowtowing before every emotional whim of his mate.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:31 PM
9

Serious question: Is there an actual genuine women hating organization out there?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:45 PM
18

Good luck with the correction. Time magazine will ignore it or maybe laugh at you.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:55 PM
5

Hated Wheaton during TNG because his character was terribly written and his acting was even worse. Learned to not hate him over the years because he seemed to develop into a cool dude and I liked some of his writing. Started hating him again when he tweeted Fuck the NRA. Started really, really hating him with his posting of the bogus MRA "facts". Like, enough to talk about it with people who actually support equal rights. Now this . . . this is something else. This calls for action.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:45 PM
-1

The best college I got into with so-so grades and awesome SAT was NYU. The best college my teammate from the school's baseball team got into was Columbia, with identical grades (slightly worse) and much worse SAT (no athletic consideration given, as we were pretty much backups & bench riders). Also he got more race-based aid, seeing as how I got none. It's true that I am not targeted by law enforcement, because I do not loiter in criminal clothing in criminal neighborhoods acting criminal. In a …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:58 PM
-1

White males have already a huge advantage, How do I access my huge advantage please? Like, I see how the non-whites are favored for promotion and subcontracts and preferential hiring in my business (civil engineering), but how do I get a racial advantage? I would like to start my own business, for example, but over 90% of contracts going to new businesses are to minority owned firms who fulfill governmental racial preference rules that I cannot, because my race is not favored by govt. Please hel…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:19 PM
7

http://i.imgur.com/fxF4goQ.jpg
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:11 PM
3

College: Call Sarah Palin a cunt, and bathe in glory. Call Hillary a cunt and be suspended and/or expelled, you woman hater. Free speech. It is a double standard, and it's all politics, and that's it.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:29 PM
1

University: Where they squeeze the last bit of free speech out of you, making you suitable for corporate world, where free speech can result in multimillion dollar lawsuits against your employer. USA! USA! USA!
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:24 PM
-1

The part that never occurred, or you misunderstood, or I miscommunicated, or you incorrectly attributed to me. Reviewing my comments, the odds that the next batch of kids would have been better for him was merely a reflection on hey, maybe if you have kids again they'll turn out even better than these that you want to kill yourself over not being able to see.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:25 PM
-4

No, but there's a 50/50 chance that the next ones will be better. It's like when someone's kids die. It's the worst emotional pain in all of infinity and nothing can make that pain go away. But the best way to deal with it, if you can, is to have more kids.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:28 PM
-6

Understandable. Still, he could have had more kids.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:49 PM
4

If I were to reach a point in life where suicide was the best option and I was penniless and my name was ruined forever by a criminal record or through smearing in the press or whatnot, I would instead opt to try to rebuild a life elsewhere. And then if that was too miserable, then I'd kill myself. But I'd give myself a shot at Life 2.0 first. Maybe the French Foreign Legion :) I'd miss my family and friends dearly, but human connections can be found elsewhere.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:11 PM
2

Exactly. Somewhere you can live off the land is ideal. Then you find a native chick and start over. Just save your last $5000 somewhere secret & safe so you can use it after they freeze all your accounts and drive you into bankruptcy and homelessness.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:43 PM
-1

Suicide is f'd up. Dude shoulda dropped off the map instead and rebuilt a modest life somewhere off the grid or in another country.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:46 PM
1

Everyone has the right to be as slutty as they desire. Hopefully the STD's only stick to the real bitches.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:09 PM
14

I'm offering nice guys advice: Don't go back to the girls who rejected you when you were too "nice" and not enough "man".
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:51 AM
49

Nice guys: Don't forgive or forget how desirable girls rejected you when you were young. When you're older and they need someone like you, rub your awesomeness in their face, if possible with pictures of your nice children included.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:48 PM
0

I do understand. Their decency is rubbing up against my machismo and it chafes.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:29 PM
-1

I don't like it when men hold the door for me. I can see other men also don't appreciate it, while some men do.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:39 PM
-3

I do bitch a lot. Maybe that's why?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:49 PM
-6

Both /s and not /s.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:06 PM
-8

No, I will continue to speak truth as I see it. Perhaps if my wife didn't complain about how I don't hold doors long enough for her to safely pass, you'd have a point, but you don't. Also we have heavy even dangerous steel & glass doors in my apartment bldg.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:52 PM
-32

I hold the door for everyone but women need it more because they're weaker and more readily assume that you WILL hold the door so if you don't they could literally end up hurt by a door. What a world
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:33 PM
0

I'm an MRM atheist conservative libertarian traditionalist who's anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage, but I wouldn't restrict either, except maybe very late term abortions. I exist.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:18 PM
7

Reminds me of when my wife talks about all eastern european wars being started by Russian women demanding more material things from their husbands.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:13 PM
-47

Because not everyone is a woman. Some people can hold their own doors.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:12 PM
32

You'll be fine. Just tap your patriarchy priveleges and then win at everything. Said/thought no man ever
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:11 PM
18

Nothing new here. They've been this way since forever. Universities are the least free places for any idea that isn't left of center.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:42 PM
1

I agree; I'd prefer a slightly different prominent gun rights organization, one that's "got its act together" a little more, but they're what we've got so I support them (but not with money).
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:48 PM
1

Either Wil corrects himself and links previous non-sabotaged surveys, or he is a dick. He's been a dick for a long time. I started really hating him when he tweeted Fuck the NRA. However his terrible acting on TNG was a show-ruiner.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:08 PM
-13

I think that for avg to smart boys, porn is no prob, and there's things to learn in there, so long as you keep in mind that normal young ladies don't have professional ho vaginas. For dumb young men I could see problems arising from porn occasionally.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:51 PM
-2

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/opinion/crashing-the-tea-party.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general "...in data we have recently collected, the Tea Party ranks lower than any of the 23 other groups we asked about — lower than both Republicans and Democrats. It is even less popular than much maligned groups like “atheists” and “Muslims.” Interestingly, one group that approaches it in unpopularity is the Christian Right." So, the Christian right, and tea partiers who are The Christian Right + The Fiscal…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:01 PM
-2

I'm pretty sure I saw some liberals reasoning that out somehow. Partisans are super at making excuses for their guy while hating on the other guy for the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:21 PM
-5

What was the nature of the revelation? His true form was evident in his voting record before he was elected, and throughout term 1, no?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:11 PM
-4

Yes, the kind that's faced racism and hate all his life for being white and male and committing the terrible crime of working in minority neighborhoods
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:10 PM
-5

Oh no, they hate the hell out of white male conservatives, who are the most hated group in America today, by far, bar none. The reason for the quantity and virulence of the hate is that they've convinced themselves that the hatred is justified.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:03 PM
-8

Yes but not enough to do anything about it, other than to re-elect him, and they would re-elect him again if they had another chance.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:58 PM
-15

No, they're bigots, against white male conservatives in particular.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:45 PM
1

Well there you have it, misandry isn't real. Men can now stop dying earlier, more often on the job, in combat, doing heavy household labor, and all those other things which aren't real. Oh and you male divorcees can have all your kids and income back, plus, and this is the real bonus, the 80% of total spending that women do in the USA can now be reversed. Spend away, my fellows, and know that your group faces zero discrimination!
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:43 PM
-9

Ask the first time. After that, simply stimulate her and she how she responds. If you've picked a good moment and are good with your mouth and hands and body, words are unnecessary. and let's face it men, we don't like words during sex unless they're related to sexual pleasure
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:18 PM
2

I oppose any group that wants to take from my group and give to itself. If I didn't oppose that, I'd be a fucking idiot, wouldn't I?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:18 PM
42

MRA's should do a color tomorrow too, let's say black, to mourn the 93% of work fatalities that are men, or combat casualties, or household heavy labor casualties. Also, what's the color for "I earn it all, she spends it all"?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:09 PM
1

Nothing says "love" like toiling for three months so that your true love can wear an overpriced shiny thing on her hand occasionally. Now pay for the wedding!
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:11 PM
2

Anti-male politically correct academia are anti-male.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:30 PM
27

I'm going to approach this from a boy's rights point of view. If the boy had been a girl, would the father have murdered her?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:21 PM
1

Parents who teach their sons to rape will totally change their whole approach thanks to her Facebook post. PS she's gonna have a high risk of bad times if she goes into the wrong neighborhoods at night. And yes, it does matter how she dresses. And how aware she is of her surroundings. And who she trusts. And how inebriated she is. Common sense hasn't stopped being sensical just because politically correct women's libbers say that common sense shouldn't be necessary.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:41 PM
0

No, people don't take MRA's seriously because "people" are willfully ignorant of MRA facts, and hateful/jealous of men.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:58 PM
1

True dat
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:50 AM
-1

It's humor. The best humor is mixed with truth.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:48 AM
-1

Your sense of humor is disgustingly nil
/r/MensRights31/01/14 09:17 PM
10

Where is the calculation of how much the average woman takes from the average man in court-ordered payments? Where is the calc of the average value of money spent on a woman while she's home unemployed and/or raising children while her man works and supports her with home/food/water/conveniences/vacations/etc? Where is the calc of how much the average man pays in taxes minus how much he takes from govt in redistribution payments, versus how much the avg woman pays in taxes minus how much she tak…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 07:13 PM
95

But you won't, because you will have invested that money in crushing women's rights, raping women, and general patriarchy. Haha just kidding, actually you will have given that money to the gold digging bitch you divorced. Haha just kidding, actually you'll already be dead because men die younger.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 07:03 PM
1

I understand but see more nuance and less absolutism, especially for children.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:26 PM
0

I cannot engage on such a deep level right now. Interesting food for thought though.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:16 PM
-1

I value the opinions of my and my wife's elders. They surely care a great deal more about us and our children than EU technocrats do.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:09 PM
0

Children don't have the right to refuse medical procedures that their parents believe are best for them. Like so many medical procedures, there's a risk/reward analysis for circumcision which is a parent's right to perform - not a state's right.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:02 PM
-2

Parents make risk/reward decisions for their children all the time. Feeding your kids processed crap food is way worse than circumcising an infant. Some of you who would have preferred to be not circumcised are alive because of circumcision, because it reduces some medical risks. OTOH, some circumcised men suffered ill health due to their circumcision. Like many risk/reward things, it's a parent's choice and should remain so. A parent could also choose to remove your appendix or tonsil or a dark…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:46 PM
-1

Your definition of human rights isn't the same as mine. Circumcision isn't the devil it's made out to be. I doubt, but allow for the possibility of, circumcision being under the same level of attack if it was a Christian (or even Islamic) rite.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:22 PM
0

For me, there's no meaningful comparison between removing a clitoris and removing foreskin. A circumcised penis functions well. There may even be sex duration advantages to desensitization, not to mention reduction of health risk.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:17 PM
-1

You've got a good point about the lack of sterility in hospitals. I'll know when my children are mature enough to make certain decisions better than govt will. I'll consider postponing circumcision until they can choose. But I'll catch an earful from the men (and probably women) in my family if I really do postpone. The only reason mine was postponed was that we came from a deeply antisemitic country where my parents couldn't get me the procedure without putting themselves at risk of reprisal
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:51 PM
-10

My body has plenty of integrity. I got it done at age 13. A little pain for a couple days, less than when I hurt myself at the playground, and no probs. Maybe I'd have had a foreskin-involved infection by now if I hadn't done it. My sons will get it too, same as I did, at a nice sterile hospital. Unless you succeed in banning it.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:29 PM
-9

My view is that part of men's rights is circumsizing your children without state interference. Why aren't people saying that circumcision will go underground and become less safe as a result of banning it? More children will have unsanitary circumcisions as a result. Why aren't people saying that Jewish men have rights too? Is it men's rights, or baby's rights? I'm not in it for baby's rights. Men should be the head of their family making decisions such as circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:56 PM
-16

Parents are responsible for children. Govt stay away.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:14 PM
0

I thought he was cool until he tweeted his hatred of guns & NRA. Add this to the list of uncoolness.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 01:30 PM
1

Definitely not gonna bend at the waist, been through that before with exercises :)
/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:06 PM
3

I'm not in a union, but I do work with and for (govt) union guys. I'll have to ask em about their paternity options.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:36 PM
4

We're lucky enough to live in an area with numerous good and fairly priced restaurant delivery options. Seafood, Japanese, pizza, Thai, Greek . . . they all deliver quickly so we're set for that. I've made a mental note to do the heavy chores before leave ends. Luckily (?) there's little chance of my wife doing heavy chores; it's not her thing. Don't worry, we know each other for 27 years so that's not a surprise or anything :) I do believe that I now want a baby carrier. I'd love to have my bab…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:28 PM
1

The stats suggest I'll need it. Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:17 PM
9

I would wear a dress if it was a requirement of paternity leave.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:17 PM
10

I definitely understand that. But for now, I'm happy.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:10 PM
45

Let's start a movement banning women from using too much TP. They use too much TP, causing more production of TP, causing more CO2 and tree killing and Earth destruction. They often don't replace the roll when they're finished wasting TP and killing the earth, causing annoyance and unsanitary choices and total doom for the rest of us. As Cheryl Crow advocated, women shall only be allowed one square of TP per visit. Who's with me, besides Cheryl?
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:39 PM
0

Non-extradition countries are useful for divorced men.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:06 PM
4

Men deserve servitude at best, and must hand over all their income to women even before divorce, or marriage. But once we have good cloning, men will cease to be useful at all (except as fodder for war, fires, and criminals), and freedom and equality shall reign over Mother Earth.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:50 PM
13

Divorces will decrease when men's finances get gender-neutral protection. Remove the divorce incentive for women, increase two parent families, increase the success of our nation's children.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 11:28 PM
3

I remember how miserable I was at college where all my valued political views were literally anathema . . . sigh
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:50 PM
16

I really, really want to educate my children, but the idea of sending them to a federally-subsidized indoctrination camp of feminism, political correctness, and dogma-as-fact "teaching" which costs tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars is an idea I have difficulty swallowing.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:26 PM
1

I'm not even one tenth as dedicated as feminists are at "toxicity". I only have to think like this because feminists are what they are. I'm the result of their toxicity.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:21 AM
1

It's not logic. It's naked agitating for my interest group's rights, which have been trampled since time immemorial. Let other people (women) die in combat and lose their children (and half their income) to cheating spouses, so that they learn first hand what "male privilege" is like.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:32 PM
1

White Girls require special protection, did't you know? I think it's in the Constitution.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:36 PM
19

Well, if equality is the goal of feminism, then let men be moved to the rear, women to the fore, and let women fight all the battles. Let men be removed from the draft and replaced by 18 year old women, and allow all that to continue for a couple hundred years, at which point we will have achieved equality. Also let stay-at-home husbands win all the divorce cases and keep everything plus half the income of all female warriors, even if they cheat on the women warriors while they're deployed and u…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 08:14 PM
2

Ecofeminism: Sounds like Rush Limbaugh invented the word
/r/MensRights20/11/13 05:07 PM
20

Angry white men come from everywhere. They're just normal people with no special connection to wealth or power or privilege, and they see people of every other race and sex getting govt-mandated benefits that they can't get, and they're pissed about it.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:03 PM
0

Human rights violation via mutilation, lollies. My circumcised penis is MAGNIFICENT. It has few equals. Being circumcised makes it prettier, cleaner, smoother, safer, longer lasting in bed, and sexier. Most especially I'm stressing the safer which is what gives this procedure moral weight. If you support vaccines, you should support safely done circumcision performed in a sanitary environment like a hospital, which is what I support as the parents choice. Both parents should have to agree to it,…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:20 AM
2

From the official govt link I posted. RIF
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:39 PM
-2

You're hijacking perfectly good words like human rights and defend for the purpose of increasing incidents of male uti and penis cancer and std. Your language terrorism is a more serious violation of my brains right to logic than my circumcision was of my penis' right to foreskin.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:02 PM
-4

If circumcision is, in reality, a drop of water, you've made it into an ocean of blood. Somewhere between rhetoric and reality lies . . . obsession
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:43 PM
-2

I'm so tempted to post pics of mutilated infants side by side with circumcised penises so that you learn the difference. Do you have a . . . difficult relationship with your genitals?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:36 PM
-2

Maybe I'd already be dead from penis cancer if not for the circumcision. Doh, you're thwarted by circumcision yet again! Also, because you need it: circumcision < disfigurement < mutilation PS seek help
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:03 PM
-5

Also, I've seen many circumcised penises, and literally not one of them is mutilated. Do you know what mutilation is? It's not the absence of a bit of foreskin. Perhaps I can link you to penis cancer or STD photos to demonstrate what actual mutilation looks like on a penis, of the sort that sanitary professional circumcision helps prevent?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:42 PM
-2

Preventative medical procedures are also a BASIC HUMAN RIGHT yet you oppose this one. Oh well, free speech and stupidity are also rights, and you're giving those a workout here. Good for you! May your son never develop diseases that circumcision reduces the risks of.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:06 PM
-5

I've already linked the benefits of circumcision. Was it a dishonest link, can you disprove it? I'm circumcised and lovin' it. Maybe I'd have died of penis cancer or acquired an STD or be suffering from frequent UTI's if I wasn't. Same as vaccinations, it helps prevent bad things. What is the downside to sanitary, doctor-performed circumcision of the sort that I had, again? My penis is awesome looking and feeling and functioning. We remove appendixes and tonsils too, often preventatively. Do you…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:55 PM
-2

I'm sure we're just discussing marginally impactful facts. If a man trains himself to hold back during self stimulation, he's all set because he can speed up or slow down as desired. Like I do. Sometimes too much causes friction burn for the lady :)
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:32 PM
-6

So babies who die from vaccination, which is rare but happens, that's reversible? Coooooool. Parents choose which preventative medical shit they want for their babies. For example, circumcision or (much deadlier) vaccines. Beyond dictating that circumcision should be safe (which I support; do it in a hospital not in a synagogue), govt can stfu. Once children are of the age of consent, then they themselves can choose preventative shit they want. For example, circumcision or (much deadlier) vaccin…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:28 PM
-8

Breast milk is the best for babies, because of hormones and immunities and just plain nature. (Unless mommy's milk is polluted.) Reducing disease risk is good. You're not going to convince me otherwise. Not sure how you got convinced. I'm not really concerned with the Jew card. So once again, where are the stats? If proper sanitary circumcision saves 5% of circumcised males from STD's or UTI's or penis cancer, while causing 0.5% of circumcised babies to have temporary complications, and 0.001% o…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:18 PM
-9

My daughter needs her breasts for feeding her babies. Foreskin is to breasts like external ear hair is to lungs. Yeah, Jews. If they were the overwhelming majority, Europe wouldn't be having this discussion. What a card play on my part. How important it is to note this, it requires multiple exclamations. Let's talk to men with cancer of the penis or STD's or UTI's and ask them if they'd trade those for longer performance in bed and a little less foreskin. I was circumcised at 13 and I regret non…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:33 PM
-8

Medical necessity is the only acceptable criterion for an irreversible modification on one's body without their consent. No. What part of babies can't give consent do you not understand? If we do things your way, let's stop piercing baby's ears, cutting nails & hair, jabbing them with vaccine needles, correcting cosmetic flaws like mild cleft lip, because, you know, there's no medical necessity to alter their sacred little bodies until they're of consent age, which is when by the way, 18 or so? …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:24 PM
-13

Circumcision has advantages and disadvantages. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Circumcision/Pages/Advantages-and-disadvantages.aspx There are several disease risks reduced by circumcision. The first listed "disadvantage" is less sensitivity during sex. This means you'll last longer in bed. I'm disinclined to consider this a problem. You'll still finish spectacularly, perhaps even more so because the more it builds, the better it is. You know, we do all sorts of medical shit to babies which carries …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:25 PM
1

As an MRA guy, I understand the non-hateful feminists' perspective (which I summarize as "men have the power" with power vaguely defined by glass ceilings, the old boy network, a majority of elected officials, superior physical strength, etc). What I don't understand is the hateful feminists, the hateful MRA's, and how both groups (but primarily MRA's) are parodied based on their most extreme members. MRA's don't like special laws or considerations given to women by courts. Feminists don't like …
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:15 PM
6

I'd agree with that, but what percentage of those women hate men? I'd imagine a low percentage. Then again, half of marriages do end in divorce :)
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:13 PM
18

TBH I do hate on feminists who hate on men. What % of women is that? Like 1%? The other 99% are A-OK by me, as a group. No pre-judgment unless I'm being prejudged.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 07:20 PM
5

I completely expect a politically correct college-educated major media source to treat men's rights with the same respect as women's rights. hahaha
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:59 PM
11

I had sex with my wife when I had stomach pains and gas issues and didn't feel like it at all, but she was horny. I was raped. I've done nothing but squat in a shower stall and cry since then.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:45 PM
33

Reason # 24 to walk away when women start crying.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:31 PM
9

I guess the govt should stop incentivizing single motherhood then. And maybe women should stop having babies without fathers. Maybe if you can't find a husband, that's a hint from nature/society that your children aren't what the world needs.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:22 PM
1

Although when I put on my construction vest and hardhat, women don't seem to mind one bit
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:47 PM
3

Men's rights mean nothing at a university.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:42 PM
0

Just accept that public and higher education are controlled by various liberal interest groups, including feminists, and nothing that you alone could do will ever change that. Eventually you'll finish university and be rid of this nonsense in 99% of your life. The other 1% will be shit like required watching of sexual harassment videos in order to get a job. You'll have to suck that up too, but again . . . nothing you alone could do about it.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:41 PM
6

"Straight" = anti-gay = anti-effeminate = anti-feminist = misogyny = BANT
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:10 PM
21

Feminists live in a fantasy world where every man is in the top 1% and can do as he pleases without consequence. "Patriarchs". 99% of (Western) men live in the real world where every court, every law, every aspect of govt, and every social standard favors women over men.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:43 PM
1

Because oral and anal rape don't exist, not even in U.S. prisons where those happen thousands of times every day
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:44 PM
29

So he's apologizing because emotionally fragile unconfident paranoid women are emotionally fragile, unconfident, and paranoid?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter