| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Who else is disgusted by thisI thought this might be your reasoning, and I understand your point of view. It's a matter of opinion though, and I disagree. Pre-nups are only significant when the two parties have significant difference in assets. The issue is that the person with more has a lot more to risk if the spouse has a change of heart (or was a deceptive gold digger.) The thing is, if the spouse is willing to sign a pre-nup, it's a sign that the relationship is not about money. I don't believe the argument that "money… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/10 12:21 PM |
| 7 | Who else is disgusted by thisWhy does a pre-nup make someone as bad as these women? I'm interested to understand this. The pre-nup that abedneg0 mentioned sounds pretty fair to me and was done to protect him from exactly the kind of behavior in the link. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 08:49 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter