TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ukreview Archive

View 241 posts and 654 comments by ukreview on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
437

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights24/05/15 01:23 PM
399

Newsukreview/r/MensRights14/02/15 12:57 PM
380

Misleading Titleukreview/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:37 PM
284

Newsukreview/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:13 PM
266

Raising Awarenessukreview/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:12 PM
263

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:47 PM
211

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:45 PM
163

Discriminationukreview/r/MensRights14/01/15 10:58 PM
108

Generalukreview/r/MensRights31/05/15 09:47 PM
102

Generalukreview/r/MensRights01/02/16 03:27 PM
81

Generalukreview/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:13 AM
80

Generalukreview/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:24 PM
67

ukreview/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:07 PM
66

Generalukreview/r/MensRights25/05/15 06:21 PM
66

Newsukreview/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:36 PM
64

Generalukreview/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:43 PM
53

Generalukreview/r/MensRights23/05/15 04:10 PM
53

Activism/Supportukreview/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:19 AM
53

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:51 AM
51

Generalukreview/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:21 AM
50

Generalukreview/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:12 PM
49

Generalukreview/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:54 PM
46

Generalukreview/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:38 PM
46

Generalukreview/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:55 PM
45

Generalukreview/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:45 PM
45

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:19 PM
44

Generalukreview/r/MensRights30/01/17 07:30 PM
44

Opinionukreview/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:48 AM
43

Generalukreview/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:58 PM
41

Generalukreview/r/MensRights09/09/15 01:27 PM
40

Generalukreview/r/MensRights01/10/15 12:09 AM
40

ukreview/r/MensRights23/11/14 08:29 AM
38

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights09/05/15 03:05 PM
36

Intactivismukreview/r/MensRights28/10/15 09:49 AM
36

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/07/15 06:45 AM
36

Generalukreview/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:46 PM
36

Generalukreview/r/MensRights13/06/15 11:34 PM
35

Generalukreview/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:41 PM
34

Generalukreview/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:23 PM
33

ukreview/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:57 PM
33

Social Issuesukreview/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:01 PM
33

Generalukreview/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:57 PM
33

Generalukreview/r/MensRights13/02/17 06:40 PM
31

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:44 PM
31

Anti-MRMukreview/r/MensRights03/05/15 10:58 PM
30

Generalukreview/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:06 PM
29

Newsukreview/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:19 PM
28

Generalukreview/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:24 PM
28

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:06 PM
28

Generalukreview/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:08 PM
28

Edu./Occu.ukreview/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:09 PM
27

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:55 PM
27

Generalukreview/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:42 AM
26

Generalukreview/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:28 AM
26

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:12 PM
25

Generalukreview/r/MensRights16/07/15 10:14 PM
23

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights17/05/15 12:28 AM
23

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:16 PM
22

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:49 PM
22

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:16 PM
22

Newsukreview/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:47 AM
21

Generalukreview/r/MensRights15/09/16 02:43 PM
21

Newsukreview/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:33 PM
21

Generalukreview/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:31 PM
21

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights16/07/15 09:35 PM
20

Newsukreview/r/MensRights27/02/15 12:05 AM
20

Generalukreview/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:23 AM
20

Generalukreview/r/MensRights05/03/16 10:57 AM
20

Generalukreview/r/MensRights08/06/16 01:03 PM
19

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:55 AM
19

Discriminationukreview/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:39 PM
19

Generalukreview/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:07 PM
18

Generalukreview/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:44 PM
18

Discriminationukreview/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:54 PM
18

Newsukreview/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:54 AM
18

Generalukreview/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:06 PM
18

Generalukreview/r/MensRights31/05/15 08:04 AM
17

Generalukreview/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:57 PM
17

Newsukreview/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:15 PM
17

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:08 PM
17

Newsukreview/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:38 PM
17

Marriage/Childrenukreview/r/MensRights28/10/17 11:51 PM
17

Generalukreview/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:38 AM
17

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights10/10/15 03:12 PM
16

Newsukreview/r/MensRights22/11/14 01:50 PM
16

Generalukreview/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:46 PM
16

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:27 PM
15

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:24 PM
15

Feminismukreview/r/MensRights29/03/15 03:13 PM
15

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:41 PM
14

Generalukreview/r/MensRights03/06/16 07:15 AM
14

Questionukreview/r/MensRights25/01/15 02:07 AM
14

Newsukreview/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:21 PM
14

Newsukreview/r/MensRights29/03/15 03:10 PM
14

Generalukreview/r/MensRights09/09/15 01:31 PM
13

Generalukreview/r/MensRights07/05/16 06:26 PM
13

Generalukreview/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:03 PM
13

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:45 PM
13

Generalukreview/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:35 PM
13

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:29 PM
13

Generalukreview/r/MensRights08/09/15 11:26 PM
13

Generalukreview/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:11 PM
12

Generalukreview/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:49 PM
12

Generalukreview/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:49 AM
12

Generalukreview/r/MensRights16/07/15 09:33 PM
12

Discussionukreview/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:07 AM
11

Generalukreview/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:08 PM
11

Newsukreview/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:52 PM
11

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:47 PM
11

Generalukreview/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:00 PM
11

ukreview/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:32 AM
10

ukreview/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:47 PM
10

Generalukreview/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:51 AM
10

Questionukreview/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:43 AM
10

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/10/15 02:42 PM
10

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/10/15 02:40 PM
10

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:48 PM
10

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:38 PM
10

Edu./Occu.ukreview/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:11 AM
10

Generalukreview/r/MensRights23/01/16 10:51 AM
10

Generalukreview/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:35 PM
9

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:20 PM
9

ukreview/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:01 PM
9

Generalukreview/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:59 PM
9

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:37 PM
9

Newsukreview/r/MensRights18/04/15 12:33 AM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:11 PM
8

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:45 AM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:01 AM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:37 PM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:16 PM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:57 PM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:08 PM
8

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:15 AM
8

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:48 AM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:31 PM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:44 AM
8

Generalukreview/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:00 PM
7

Newsukreview/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:36 PM
7

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights09/05/15 07:10 AM
7

Generalukreview/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:27 PM
7

Newsukreview/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:33 PM
7

Generalukreview/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:33 PM
7

Generalukreview/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:13 AM
7

Generalukreview/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:16 AM
7

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/01/16 09:39 PM
7

Newsukreview/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:06 PM
6

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:01 PM
6

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights23/05/15 11:48 AM
6

Newsukreview/r/MensRights22/11/14 01:57 PM
6

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:34 PM
6

Discussionukreview/r/MensRights18/01/15 12:47 AM
6

ukreview/r/MensRights18/01/16 08:54 AM
6

ukreview/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:57 PM
6

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:58 AM
6

Newsukreview/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:12 PM
6

Newsukreview/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:51 PM
5

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:12 PM
5

Discriminationukreview/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:26 AM
5

Newsukreview/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:34 AM
5

Generalukreview/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:05 PM
5

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:55 AM
5

Social Issuesukreview/r/MensRights29/10/17 12:26 AM
5

Edu./Occu.ukreview/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:02 AM
5

Generalukreview/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:31 PM
5

Generalukreview/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:08 AM
5

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:14 PM
5

Discussionukreview/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:25 PM
5

Generalukreview/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:17 PM
4

Newsukreview/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:31 PM
4

Discussionukreview/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:20 AM
4

ukreview/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:19 AM
4

Generalukreview/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:50 PM
4

Generalukreview/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:42 PM
4

Newsukreview/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:18 AM
4

ukreview/r/MensRights13/07/16 11:41 AM
4

Generalukreview/r/MensRights23/05/16 09:23 PM
4

Newsukreview/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:08 AM
3

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:16 PM
3

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:58 PM
3

Generalukreview/r/MensRights09/06/17 01:26 AM
3

Newsukreview/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:04 PM
3

Raising Awarenessukreview/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:53 PM
3

Newsukreview/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:33 PM
3

Discussionukreview/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:36 PM
3

Generalukreview/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:18 PM
3

ukreview/r/MensRights24/12/14 10:37 AM
3

Discussionukreview/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:46 PM
3

Social Issuesukreview/r/MensRights01/10/17 01:33 AM
3

Newsukreview/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:36 AM
3

Feminismukreview/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:43 PM
3

Generalukreview/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:51 PM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:26 AM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:41 PM
2

Generalukreview/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:27 AM
2

WBBukreview/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:46 PM
2

Legal Rightsukreview/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:07 PM
2

Generalukreview/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:14 PM
2

Generalukreview/r/MensRights04/06/15 12:54 PM
2

Activism/Supportukreview/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:48 PM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights19/04/15 07:55 AM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights19/04/15 07:53 AM
2

ukreview/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:49 PM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:38 AM
2

Generalukreview/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:15 PM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:04 AM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:59 PM
2

Newsukreview/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:15 PM
1

Newsukreview/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:35 AM
1

Newsukreview/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:28 AM
1

Questionukreview/r/MensRights05/12/14 04:02 PM
1

Newsukreview/r/MensRights05/01/15 12:39 PM
1

Newsukreview/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:42 AM
1

Questionsukreview/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:34 PM
1

Generalukreview/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:48 AM
1

Generalukreview/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:49 AM
1

Progressukreview/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:42 PM
1

Newsukreview/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:01 PM
1

Newsukreview/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:48 PM
1

Questionukreview/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:34 PM
1

ukreview/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:50 AM
1

Generalukreview/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:15 PM
0

ukreview/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:42 PM
0

Generalukreview/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:11 PM
0

Discussionukreview/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:54 PM
0

Newsukreview/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:39 PM
0

Newsukreview/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:06 AM
0

Newsukreview/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:53 PM
0

Questionukreview/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:15 AM
0

ukreview/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:50 PM
0

ukreview/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:59 PM
0

ukreview/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:24 PM
0

Newsukreview/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:24 PM
0

Questionukreview/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:54 PM
0

Feminismukreview/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:00 PM
0

Generalukreview/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:03 PM
0

ukreview/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:12 PM
0

Generalukreview/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:45 PM
0

Questionukreview/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:59 PM
0

ukreview/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:44 AM
0

ukreview/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:34 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

that's the point exactly. when women feel as at risk of a false accusation as men, there will be a change
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:38 AM
2

I think an increase in number of allegations by men against women would make a big impact. if due process is followed, this would hopefully result in more prosecutions. whether this leads to more convictions of women is neither here or there. point is, women will start complaining about what we've been complaining about all along and manybe something will be done.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:37 AM
1

but stats are stats, they don't change just because the media refuses to listen.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:34 AM
2

how does one prove in a court that the girl said yes? no more trips to spain for me!
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:30 AM
2

wasn't the whole #metoo thing about anecdotes? the media is far more likely to report human stories. the more personal and anecdotal, the better.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 07:13 PM
7

It appears that Darren Saunders realizes HE is the mediocre one and he's clearly using his guilt at being paid a tonne of cash for writing bad articles to attempt to make all men feel bad about things we haven't done.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 01:46 AM
2

I don't see how being dressed as a woman is particularly creepy in itself. good point. this is not the 1980s. a man dressed as a woman is not grounds for calling cops. society has moved on. funny how MRAs become crazed misandrists. no better than feminists for this type of crap.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 01:45 AM
2

the dudes on here saying allegation of 'man dressed as woman' justifies MRAs to become instant cucked femtards ought to be ashamed.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:11 PM
7

women still can't legally rape men even if the intent (control etc) is the same. This will probably not change for a few generations, if ever. On this issue we have about 30 years worth of campaigning to do.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:23 PM
15

I thought only women could dump their partners and/or enjoy porn and I thought guys had to always get erect on demand regardless of what his partner looks like. I listen to the MSM too much.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:53 PM
1

no. in that new Jamestown a woman knees a guy in the balls. If that happened to me, in self-defence I'd bounce her out the window!
/r/MensRights01/05/17 06:21 PM
2

millionairess. don't let the feminists rob us of our grammar as well as our dignity.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 10:48 AM
1

if the guy is assumed innocent, then we must also assume the accusation is false. What other conclusion can there be? Don't tell me the regressives found a third way.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:52 PM
1

I agree we shouldn't fight each other, but some issues will lead to that. Personally I will continue to say what I want and if I accidentally breach community rules I've no doubt a mod will inform me. Other than that I have no desire to try to manufacture the shape or direction of debate on here. This, like Brexit, is not a political party where we must adhere to and publicly promote rules we may or not agree with. Being told what we should discuss or be concerned with here is no different to ha…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:53 PM
2

don't watch the crappy BBC, but I do know that if you have an arranged marriage, have sex and then change your mind about marriage, you go to jail for rape
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:10 AM
3

only if you've got aids or hiv and you don't tell your partner. there is no law saying you must wear a condom if you are healthy
/r/MensRights12/01/17 08:05 PM
2

removes protection from pregnancy surely she has obtained consent by fraud if she said don't worry, there's no way I will get pregnant because I'm on the pill. in the uk atleast, consent by fraud is rape, only applies to men though.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 08:04 PM
9

the problem in the UK is that female MPs tend to vote for and have an interest in female issues whereas most male MPs consider broader gender neutral issues. Feminists always say if men aren't happy that only female issues are dealt with we should do something about it, whenever men in an social environment try to create a men's issues group (at work, college), it gets banned.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:33 AM
15

feminists demand reproductive rights for themselves but always block it for men. Of course they will try to stop it and probably succeed.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:30 AM
0

then surely it's illegal for a woman to have sex with a drunk man too?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:50 PM
3

don't they get that legally woman ought to get consent from men too?
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:31 AM
1

how does the 'withdrawing consent' argument go?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 08:37 AM
1

sick of the usual 'she was too drunk to say yes' crap. if they are both drinking, why must he get consent from her but she doesn't need it at all . will always remember the debate on bbc1 where one contributor was talking rationally about why it's important for both parties to be responsible where drink and sex occurs and the feminist jumps in with 'but in law women don't need consent'.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 08:32 AM
3

in case anyone is in any doubt, milo is pro-circumcision. He isn't being ironic. He really believes it's better for the world
/r/MensRights15/09/16 02:47 PM
1

I tend to avoid rape stories as it's deeply frustrating to me. I think a problem here is how the law is v how we wish it would be. If the definition were more gender neutral I think there would be less confusion. I think people add their own spin onto cases precisely because they feel the law as it is is unjust. I know it's policy here not to debate the law as it stands but maybe in future there should a window of opportunity for those who wish to focus on this area of MRA. There are many with a…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:31 AM
1

it was a co-production between bbc and open uni so it maybe online somewhere
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:21 AM
3

was watching it and was equally shocked. what was the problem? they didn't have enough to go around or it was just standard policy that the men can't have them? It was cold and snowing. What happened to 'first come, first served'?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:20 AM
1

totally agree about her taking it out of context. She should have waited for the dust to settle first. It does seem that Turkey wanted to make a distinction between sex abuse of children and more consensual stuff with older teens. The government has been given time to respond. As usual, feminists jumping on anyone who even attempts to change the way any laws relating to sex are dealt with.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 02:48 PM
1

thanks, I added the archive link
/r/MensRights16/08/16 02:43 PM
6

you think it's payback time? let's bring down the patriarchy by attacking all men? how pathetically retarded that is
/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:29 AM
3

not worth making an official complaint. if you've watched the newswatch programme on the bbc news channel you'll know how the bbc news team never accept any criticism. best to attack them on twitter over specific issues and link it directly to a journalist like the telegraph's martin daubney. not an mra, but very sympathetic. (a) if he wants to run with the story he can (b) he's a journalist. tips from the public are his trade
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:26 PM
1

this is a big problem. I tend to separate normal women from the feminists. most (non-feminist) women are reasonable on most issues but when it comes to equal parenting they do think they are naturally better and many do have the view that men should help out more but should be supervised and not given any decision making. we must either take a back seat or jump in the driving seat. why more fathers don't demand greater control is beyond me. I don't mean the fathers for justice types, I mean all …
/r/MensRights22/07/16 04:18 PM
2

incidentally, the Good Men project (often responsible for blaming men for everything bad in society) disagrees that we are driven by biology. http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/older-guys-lust-young-women/
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:16 AM
2

to emphasise the fact it's a myth
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:07 PM
9

My fave links: http://time.com/2921491/hope-solo-women-violence/ http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/19133-women-more-likely-to-commit-domestic-violence-studies-show http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10752232/Our-attitude-to-violence-against-men-is-out-of-date.html
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:58 AM
0

OMG you are going to shag a slutty girl and not bother with protection (filming it) and risk going to jail for ever? good luck on that one! bet you always pay your taxes on time too!
/r/MensRights27/05/16 11:38 PM
3

making fun of his appearance is the kind of thing he's talking about. play the ball not the man.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 05:21 PM
4

another survey? how many are we going to get on this? maybe they should ask men what their ideal vagina is. wait for the feminists to drop their shit.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 09:15 PM
6

did I misread or did the head of a uni joke about women running the world in the middle of a serious article on the educational problem faced by men? the women interviewed didn't seem to really care less about the issue, only to the extent it impacted the economic growth of the country.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:09 PM
1

he is very camp. I can't listen to him.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 11:00 AM
2

women have always used sex to control men. Now the whole weight of the government machine is being used to put men who use sex for anything in jail.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:52 PM
5

johnson successfully fought the actual rape charge. the only charges that stuck were touching and grooming
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:07 PM
1

there is no law against the press reporting on people accused of crimes. The point is there is a hell of a lot of women accused of having sex with boys. except for the UK, there is a word for that. it's called rape
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:00 PM
1

discrimination
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:57 PM
2

a) a kid is a kid. both very young kids. boys are less mature than girls, so one cancels the other out. b) you are a mindreader are you? c) no there wasn't
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:39 PM
1

literally? as opposed to what? you should literally improve your grammar.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:37 PM
3

adult having sex with a boy. That's rape. Law needs to be changed.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:35 PM
3

no need for sarcasm here. in india men are charged with rape for agreeing to marry the woman, having a sexual relationship and then breaking up 6 months later and thus, breaking the promise to marry.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:46 PM
9

the police are the only ones skilled to deal with accusations of crime. If they are objective (which it seems they usually aren't) then the accused will be protected. Plus, regret-rape is less likely to be reported and thus won't result in the destruction of young men's lives
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:46 PM
0

where do they come from? i wanna know how most women prefer an above average sized cock. If most men had above average then the whole measuring process would have to be re-done. it's basic maths.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:44 PM
1

are you a fag or a woman? the point is public money is wasted on this shit. who gives a crap what women think is and isn't the perfect cock? who cares what they think about anything?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:42 PM
0

it's not news, it's research
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:40 PM
-1

yes it does. double standards. public money wasted on asking women their sexual preferences. if this were to be done for men there would be a shitstorm
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:37 PM
2

when was the last time a university spent public money asking us?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:42 PM
1

No sympathy for any adult who has sex with a kid, but the legal implications of this worry me. Anyone reporting themselves as a potential pedo needs legal and psychological help. These guys are risking being stuck on a secret list forever. by the way, pedophilia is a medical thing. Most people reported in the media as pedophiles are not, medically speaking. All the footballers getting caught are not pedos. The bigger worry here is the sinister idea of attempting to treat male sexual arousal as a…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 01:10 PM
1

what a small mind you must have. Ever tried being a male teacher in a female dominated industry?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:51 PM
2

woman have reproductive rights and men don't
/r/MensRights26/03/16 11:16 AM
1

but now everyone knows you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:57 PM
0

how does advocating alternative medicine have any relevance here? btw the UK invented modern democracy, so the chances of him doing what you say to become head of state is zero. besides, 1/4 of the global population would have to accept it as they also would have him as their head of state. his interventions in political discourse are minimal due to who he is.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:56 PM
4

point is, many female teachers have been having sex with underage boys and have had very lenient sentences. where is the outrage from government and the CPS for that?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:25 AM
7

yeah and keep in mind he was found not guilty of having sex with her. most of the male celebrities who've been prosecuted since Saville have complained that the prosecution put lots of different minor offences/counts together in the hope that one sticks. kissing an underage girl is hardly the same as having sex with her.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:24 AM
2

what does his hair colour have to do with it you total knobhead?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:19 AM
2

this is excellent. with your permission, I'll be using this in future debates I have with feminists.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:59 PM
1

if he wins his appeal (let's face it, it could go either way as the evidence against him was hardly damning) the feminists will still claim technically he's guilty. they always use the 'you can't turn toast back into bread once it's been toasted' argument. Once convicted, that's it.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:32 PM
1

just checked the attorney general's twitter feed. almost every case where he intervened resulted in a man going to jail for longer.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:00 PM
1

women can't be prosecuted for rape. it's that simple. the message being spread by government and police is that only a guy needs consent. The woman doesn't.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 08:50 AM
4

but you can't take a plea deal in the UK. you either plead guilty or not guilty. this woman was found guilty and got off with a conditional discharge.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:44 AM
4

FYI wage gap is a myth
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:25 AM
4

It's only TV, but in The Odd Couple (50 years ago) Oscar got divorced and had to keep sending the money to his wife until she got remarried. There were no physical problems stopping her from getting off her lazy ass and getting a job, but when he failed to send a cheque, she would threaten to get the cops on him! Has much changed since then?
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:23 AM
1

he's getting taunted a lot online about only supporting Michelle because he's attracted to her! but the suggestion he was (allegedly) bought off by Cruz seems credible.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:13 AM
2

shapiro is getting torn apart on social media for being an SJW! also his Jewish heritage is getting mentioned a lot! some guy found loads of his old tweets in which he was supporting Trump, so something must have caused him to change.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:10 AM
2

is it right Shapiro wasn't happy that Breitbart failed to support or stand-up for Michelle and that's why he left? I read he had denied he is looking for a job at Fox News. I hope that's true. During the UK police enquiry into newspaper hacking Rupert Murdock sold-out all his journalists by giving all their names/incriminating info. to the police. So much for protecting sources etc.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:25 PM
3

quick addition: the main reason the UK police give for never seeing very many cases of male victims of rape is that the men never come forward. that's their excuse. In the case of female victims, the government spends millions trying to encourage victims to come forward.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:14 PM
4

exactly. apply the logic of this case to rape. the police shouldn't decide to not intervene simply because the victim says she doesn't feel she's a victim. apart from anything, it means women are put into a position where they decide whether or not they have been raped, only after the event. A guy is a rapist if the women is in a bad mood or feels a bit dirty the next day.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:12 PM
9

"I know you want it!" seriously? saying "I know you want it!" means you could be a danger to young girls? That's the problem. The left-wingers want to punish men for anything and everything and the right-wingers want to stop us from thinking of or having sex at all.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:09 PM
3

plus, she did attack Trump, so he attacked her. Seems fair to me.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:04 PM
1

I though Catholics couldn't re-marry
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:03 PM
2

in india you are accused of rape if your relationship breaks up after promising to marry her
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:18 PM
3

saying you got raped but won't let men drag you down seems to be the 'in' thing at the moment, especially people who wish to attract attention. almost like a badge of honour. if we were to accept the most liberal 'affirmative consent' definition of rape and apply it to everyone who's ever had sex, we've probably all been raped at least once.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:17 PM
1

the views of the woman in labour are irrelevant. This about societal cultures
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:00 PM
1

agreed. pussy is pussy
/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:08 PM
1

what is he, a flirting expert or what? I agree with most of it but not this bit: 'They’ve had guys who can’t look away from their chest during conversation.' If you're looking it's probably because they are sticking out. A guy shouldn't be criticized for acting rationally to irrational/unexpected stimuli. I hate this 'stop staring at my big boobs' thing.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:58 AM
3

a well-known radfem journo re-tweeted it, so it seems unlikely it was sarcasm
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:05 PM
1

given the low number of prosecutions, let alone convictions, it's a fair bet most allegations have no merit. Why do people say they are rare?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 09:34 PM
3

it's been viewed 2.3 Mil Views. not bad
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:43 PM
1

sanders is going nowhere fast
/r/MensRights05/03/16 12:37 AM
0

Of course nobody is saying he is using it a qualification for high office. As for Rubio, he was trying to out-Trump Trump. 1st rule is don't lower yourself to the standards of others. It will backfire. Who started it isn't the issue, but how Trump responded surely. Even joking about it (which you seem to be suggesting) is only a few steps from laughing at a 'kick in the nuts' scene from a 1990s comedy. Gender based attacks are gender based attacks.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:29 PM
1

trump doesn't command the majority of the Republican vote, let alone the electorate. By supporting him voters will ensure Clinton wins. Totally self-defeating. There is stupid on all sides, but all Trump does is encourage feminists they are right.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:21 PM
2

I know he's not an MRA but his kind of tactic is very damaging to the issues the MRM is fighting for. My point was that he is creating a false choice between nice, progressive feminists on the one hand and his extreme alpha-male views on the other. The MRM is in the middle and will be crushed or torn-apart. I agree he's a trojan horse and when everyone realises, it will be too late. The feminists will be running the Whitehouse.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:47 PM
1

the prosecution in the UK goes after football players and totally ignores the dozens and dozens of female teachers who sexually abuse schoolboys. I say ignore, in the sense that they are not working with the government to change rape laws so they apply equally to women and men. Most teachers who are prosecuted are let off even when found guilty by a jury.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 10:15 PM
6

there have been cases where a guy put holes in condoms so his wife would get pregnant. he was charged with rape on the grounds of getting consent on a false basis. when women do the same thing - nothing happens but the state forces the guy to be financially responsible
/r/MensRights02/03/16 08:15 AM
1

I am quite encouraged by the fact it's only a week away and very little about it has been on my social media feeds so far
/r/MensRights02/03/16 08:12 AM
1

In debating the need for both sexes to be respectful of the other, the extreme feminists argue that women can't be legally guilty of rape and that's the end of the debate. The more reasonable feminists will normally argue that although women can't be found guilty of rape there are similar offences which carry similar sentences. This of course ignores the facts that: (1) just the word 'rape' is such a taboo that to even be accused is so incredibly devastating that it would lead any sane and ratio…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 11:28 AM
-1

please stop making our movement look bad btw - you don't need any help from me
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:35 AM
-2

wow, were you crying when you wrote that? you sound a little girl-ish.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:31 AM
-2

haha you're a liberal. sorry to hear that
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:28 AM
0

you lost me after the first paragraph. You need to edit those cut and paste jobs a little. You quoted statute law but even you would accept that the whole point of political activism is to campaign to change laws. Missing the boat is irrelevant. As was most of your comment.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:27 AM
1

Oddly, I couldn't care less if you disagree with me. The rights of a father are covered by MRM and I will continue to campaign on it. Interesting how you can confidently claim most support your pro-abortion views. You have no evidence of that. Your God-like powers impress me. You can support murdering babies if you wish. I don't think the MRM can support that and those of us who support the protection of all babies (regardless of gender) will continue to fight abortion at every opportunity inclu…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:21 AM
0

if you think reproductive rights of men (including a say on whether your baby is killed) are not an MRM issue, you should consider joining a feminist movement.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:15 AM
1

have you met one who wasn't ugly? I haven't. I speak as I find.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:13 AM
0

you don't understand how the UK NHS works then. We pay taxes, the government provides free in-house healthcare. This is privatization. Women is given voucher to spend anywhere she likes. As a taxpayer, I have every right to demand she goes to a hospital like everyone else. To the extent a woman carries my baby, believe me, I have a voice in this.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:12 AM
6

most of the things listed are rights as they are in law. perfect example - a woman can rape a guy and isn't prosecuted. a female teacher can rape a boy. how? it's written in law that the victim must be female or the perp. must use a penis. I could go on.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:52 PM
2

exactly. I would like to counter-argue the entire basis of this post. I think the MRM is exactly about taking the rights of women away. Feminists have successfully managed over the year to bring in laws which give them privilege and attack men whilst at the same time create a narrative that we have all the privilege and they have nothing.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:51 PM
-4

yikes. spoken like a true feminist. man up.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:48 PM
4

it's called privatization under the guise of 'choice'.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:47 PM
-2

you have just successfully outlined exactly why it's an MRM issue and why we should be campaigning for rights here. Wasn't trying to trick you, but you gave me the answer I wanted. Thanks. By the way, there is no rational reason for giving women choice in this area. You go to your local provider. Simple.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:45 PM
3

I stopped complaining to the BBC a long time ago. best thing is to go onto their social networks and tell their followers what you think.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:46 PM
1

Eureka is not a political website. They merely post science papers and I see of no reason why it should be blacklisted by the MRM. If anything, we should encourage more academics to publish male-specific research as a counter to the occasional crap that feminist scientists publish. Nothing I hate more than people dishonestly using science to attempt to prove a political narrative. Don't blame the messenger.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:45 PM
2

Chris Bryant MP today in a SKY News debate with UKP leader Nigel Farage claimed being in the EU was good for protecting women and girls from being forced into sexual slavery. Clearly no concern for boys.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:20 PM
3

Kate Andrews from Adam Smith Institute destroyed the myth on today's edition of the BBC Daily Politics. Watch out for her, she is very impressive! Plus, she's a good example of a smart woman who can be successful without playing the victim card!
/r/MensRights12/02/16 10:12 PM
2

we know from studies that when 'rape' is replaced by 'unwanted sex' that men report the same number of cases.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:38 PM
9

once again the police seem to think only women are rape victims
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:08 PM
2

I just checked the social media streams for the PM and ministry of justice, there is a tonne of money being awarded to women prisoners for various things
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:49 AM
3

exactly. happily he lost his seat at the election. maybe people remembered his sex scandal from a few years ago and decided to ditch him!
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:40 AM
0

I have read many people on here argue that as much of an oddball as milo is, we are better to have him than not. I have always argued he is a danger to the MRM. It just happens that his current thing is free speech and this gives him the chance to go head to head with the feminists, but he has no interest in the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:38 PM
0

I would also add that Breitbart are very pro-Israeli, which would explain that every other article they write is about how bad they think muslims are. Milo is pushing for all baby boys in the world to be circumcised. Why is anyone surprised Breitbart is mixing up return of Kings with the MRM?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:22 PM
2

Breitbart is not a supporter of the MRM. I have long argued on here for the MRM to give Milo and his mates a wide birth. They are anti-feminist, but they have no interest in our issues.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:17 PM
0

I think the point being made by the poster was about double standards, which there are.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:23 PM
1

exactly. the woman will normally blame her actions on society, patriarchy or fear of her male partner.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:54 AM
1

sex abuse falls much more easily into the feminist theory narrative of men using sex to control women I guess.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:53 AM
0

again, if up to 90% of cases are not reported, how do you know most pre-teen abusers are men?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:52 AM
1

it's not about causation. being a woman doesn't cause you to abuse your kid, but if being a woman makes you more likely to abuse kids and you are seen by peers as less suspicious because of the pussy pass, it stands to reason you'll have more opportunity to abuse.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:51 AM
1

they have done a lot of good on political corruption, big-brother etc. but they let themselves down with the feminist crap
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:44 AM
12

circumcision IS bad.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:35 AM
2

totally understand you on this. Whether or not you obeyed and waited, the point is you are having to act or react at the moment and quite frankly who is to say how any of us would react. There is clearly an issue of 'false imprisonment' if a member of the public attempts to hold you against your will. You reacted rationally to a very irrational situation. I do often feel this way when I find myself cutting through a park where kids are playing. Many a time I have found myself walking right behin…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 07:20 PM
3

in most cases, they won't. kind of the point of it being posted on here.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:49 AM
6

you know full well that this kind of crap does not target boys who we know have similar issues. such workshops are never offered to boys or their parents. day in and day out this sort of stuff happens all the time. anytime something similar is offered to men or boys it gets cancelled after the feminists complain it will make girls feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:48 AM
1

check out those early Flintstones episodes. Wilma was always beating/threatening to beat the crap out of Fred. Actually, she used to commit emotional abuse way back before it was even a thing!
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:58 PM
1

from reading the aims and purpose of the session, the entire debate is about getting men to do whatever is necessary to benefit women and to lessen the gender pay gap. I could just put this down to politics, but isn't that parliament is all about? Just politics. Sooner they realize we are not buying what they wish to sell they will find an alternative pitch. They are dumping on 50% of the voters with this crap.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:13 PM
6

I think that has been or still is being considered by the EU officials
/r/MensRights18/01/16 10:53 AM
3

The question was so incredibly loaded and although Milo answered it with evidence, he was still ignored and the great BBC machine rolled on without him...
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:37 AM
3

problem with campbell (presenter) is he started off as a 2nd rate radio 1 dj and never really got much better. He's spent so much time working at the BBC (5 live) he's forgotten what the real world is like. To work for the BBC is to assume Feminist Theory as gospel.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:35 AM
3

Just watched the video. I am probably one of Milo's greatest critics and I have often warned on here that we shouldn't allow him to represent us in such high-profile debates. He is stupid to be telling everyone how many twitter followers he has. that opens him up to ridicule and sarcasm from the presenter, never mind the feminists in the debate. that said, in fairness to him, these women are nuts. the black professor claiming white male privilege in the UK is as rampant as ever and for the white…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:35 PM
2

the bbc always get someone like him to represent the MRM. of course he is entitled to his views but he is not an academic or intellectual and he tends to let us down.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 01:41 PM
2

I have seen several studies suggesting boys get lower grades for being boys, so which is it? I guess this is just a small snapshot.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 12:22 PM
1

exactly. Unlike other areas of crime, with rape the CPS throws shit at the wall and waits to see what sticks. The only serious crime I can think of where you go to jail based on the word of your accuser.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 12:55 AM
-1

Of course nobody likes censorship and Milo, to his credit, is fighting those who are pushing for censorship. be they feminists, or any other group. My problem with Milo is that he's a troll and probably got unverified because it's the badge of celebrity status and you can't have professional trolls wearing that badge. I don't believe for a second twitter is punishing him because he's a conservative. it's because he targets his victims on twitter and yells at them until they block him or report h…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 07:26 PM
1

interesting but a little old
/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:20 PM
-1

oh, and if Milo had his way, every baby boy would be circumcised right after birth.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:03 PM
-1

Milo is pure scum. Last year he wrote an article on why he encourages teens to self-harm. Now he's lost his verification on Twitter. Not because Twitter is against free speech, but because Milo is a troll. He has nothing to add to the MRM except his very narrow interest in free speech.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:02 PM
0

if you're blaming all men for this rather than the cultural background of those doing it, you're no better than those raving radfems. If you think those women in germany have a legitimate case that they are not getting the protection from the state they should, again, you're (1) advocating feminism (2) demanding something men don't get either.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 08:12 PM
4

This is why I have always warned against using Milo from Brietbart as a role model as to how MRA's conduct themselves when debating with feminists in public. Firstly, he's not an MRA, he's just anti-feminist/pro-free speech. Secondly, he believes in treating transgendered men as mentally ill, who should get help being cured of their urges.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:23 PM
5

I was shocked by that crap too. Male privilege and masculinity were the cause!
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:35 AM
13

i don't think it is. it's what feminists call 'ironic sexism', which apparently is ok if directed towrads men, bit like the #killallmen thing. No harm meant, just fun, they say.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:54 PM
8

putting aside the fact that research done by the USA navy proved that circumcision doesn't reduce HIV, what these academics are doing is downright predatory! Going after people in poor countries (where witchcraft and all that other crap is normal) and appealing to them through their masculinity is abusive. I have written to the college to tell them so. There are villages in these God-forsaken parts of the world where if you don't volunteer, they get you, drag you from your house in the middle of…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:38 PM
4

stats mean nothing. In UK a woman can't physically rape. Not because of biology, but because of the definition being too narrow. Police don't keep stats on male victims, or rarely do as female rape isn't a crime. A woman can't be charged, prosecuted or convicted for a crime which doesn't exist on the statute books. However, the question 'how many women actually rape?' is the question I always get from a feminist when I debate this issue. For the reasons stated it's impossible to answer. The line…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:40 PM
2

yes, I agree. although the language in the dictionary sounds sexist, you can't blame it. The blame is of course with the people who wrote the law (Parliament) and those who enforce it (the police, CPS) for not lobbying the government to change it so it's gender-neutral and includes female rape situations. My question: does anyone know of a campaign or any attempt whatsoever at changing the law? Anything going in in parliamentary sub-committees or the House of Lords?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:34 PM
1

the so called term 'manosphere' is as meaningless as 'lad culture'.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:32 AM
1

when did the UK adopt 'affirmative consent' rape laws? as far as I know, we haven't. so, the fact she hasn't said no is not consent? could have fooled me. that is EXACTLY what it means. in the UK the culture we have means that we stop if she says no. This is not California, where you can only start after she has said yes. or am I missing something. forget about what the police say in their dubious poster campaigns, what does statute law say about this? the police are the last ones on this planet…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:40 PM
1

he works for the california office of Brietbart. There is a London branch headed by a former UKIP advisor who got sacked for being too 'tea-party-ish' but Milo doesn't work there. He is based in USA.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:50 PM
0

I know we are always getting told that no single person in the MRM has a view which is more valid than another, but seriously dude, if you don't think circumcision breaches the human rights of boys and that it is MGM, then you don't really belong in the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:48 PM
3

Milo advocates 'straight' conversion therapy for transgenders, which is odd given that it's something that most developed nations now regard as a human rights violation against gays. Although he is gay and often claims to be a gay rights activist, even on this issue he has a dubious record. I don't think he can be trusted. I would have thought a true MRA would campaign for the rights of all men, even though who wish to be legally recognised as women. He actually wants trangenders kicked out of t…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 09:25 PM
3

the article is written by someone who want to believe men can be victims but appears to struggle with saying it. The writer also accepts all known data which supports the theory that men are normally the perp.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:17 AM
1

yes, I think you are right here. I can't cite any specific studies, but I think it has been proven many times that society is sexist in favour of women because of the White Knight thing.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:06 AM
2

It doesn't matter if 100% of your gropers were male. To have policies that discriminate against men, it is still discrimination against men to assume all men are potential gropers. However, this type of logic is applied to every situation in public/criminal policy.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:03 AM
2

anti-male sentiment has spread across the anglosphere, in partucular the richest of the West (UK, USA, Australia, Canada, NZ). I am guessing things are just as bad in USA as anywhere else.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:00 AM
1

Feminist anti-MRA journalists will always look and eventually find something vile which they will then use to back-up their claims all MRAs are evil. This is intellectual dishonesty but they all do it.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:58 AM
0

I have often found myself agreeing with a feminist on a particular area but the moment she makes a general attack on the MRM she loses my interest and I move on. I have no time for feminists who attack an entire community because of their own ill-educated views.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:56 AM
18

I am a little disturbed by comments made in the article about it being morally wrong to take money away from female victims and to give it to male victims. Surely if there is a fixed budget, then it is perfectly moral to spend the money according to the victim ratoos. If 40% are male, then they should get 40% of the money. Just because women have got used to taking all the money for themselves, it's no reason to continue with this now we know about it. I don't get this argument that we must only…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:49 AM
1

easily. I vote for governments which advocate a constitutional-monarchy political settlement. The Queen of England a symbolic figurehead and has very little power, unless you count the privvy council, which is a talking shop. Before attacking such a system, keep in mind the alternative isn't any better. A Republic is not a democracy. A Republic is actually representative government ruled by a Constitution whereas a democracy is direct government ruled by a majority. Like France during the revolu…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:05 PM
1

given I am probably twice the age of Milo I would guess I have been an MRA since before he started high school.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:59 PM
0

so you think white straight men can't win the argument and we need gays and women to do our fighting for us. that says something.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 12:08 AM
1

and some MRAs claim all feminists are ugly lesbians. obviously, that's not really the case. However, bitter unattractive losers is exactly how Milo used to describe gamers.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 12:07 AM
1

he hates gays even though he is one. I doubt it has any affect at all. If we need evidence of an MRA who hates women, we have Milo. Being gay actually gives him the perfect motive for hating women.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 12:05 AM
1

I have seen him in an interview confirm he is only bothered by 3rd wave There has been a huge improvement in terms of coverage in mainstream media. The Telegraph often has good articles which would have been unthinkable in the past. It's quality not quantity we need. We have Justice For Men And Boys. Milo is jumping on the bandwagon. Hopefully he will fall off. Attending an anti-rape protest and holding a sign saying rape culture is the same as Harry Potter is pathetic and is doing more harm tha…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 12:03 AM
1

he's anti 3rd wave feminism. that's it. After spending years slagging off gamers he has now become one. This happened at the exact same time breitbart needed a tech reporter. Milo stands for nothing except trolling feminists on twitter. He is an expert at that. He is not an MRA. He is using the MRM and when he's done he will move on and the reputation of the non-political (so I thought) movement will be in tatters. just watch how he conducts himself compared to the likes of David Aaronovitch. Bo…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 11:58 PM
1

Breitbart is funded by Republicans and is a very right-wing news rag. They use any issue they can to raise their own profile. what have my views on Republicans got to do with it? Since you brought it up - I have no interest in the Republican party. I am a Tory. We gave North America democracy. I am also a Monarchist, so that would make me anti-Republican. I believe in democracy, how can I be a Republican?
/r/MensRights15/11/15 11:49 PM
1

don't be sorry. I forgive you. how long have I been an MRA? about as long as Milo has been accusing all young male gamers of being pedos (i.e.) as long as I can remember.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 11:43 PM
1

he seems to be only interested in third-wave feminism. I think he's happy with the rest. I think beyond the campus rape/free speech/pay-gap debates, he has little to say on men's rights. What he is doing is turning more and more moderate or disinterested people against the MRM. The anti-MRA people needed a face to think of when attacking us. Now they have one.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:13 PM
2

He is gay but also hates gays (most of them anyway). He admitted it in that video with Dean Cain, the Superman actor. he's anti-trans and I actually think his appeal to gay men is limited. He's just too right wing for them. Of course gay men can be right-wing, but Milo very rarely speaks out for gay men.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:09 PM
1

It's fair to say the MRM is not a political movement. Given his republican views, he is turning it into a political football that he uses to boost the awareness of Breitbart.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:06 PM
1

he has form on this 'irony' thing. The problem is his jokes are often backfiring because people don't always know he's joking
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:04 PM
1

I think calling him photogenic is a bit OTT, but ok if you say so.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:02 PM
1

how can you get outraged by someone saying you shouldn't worship a guy who makes a living out of trolling people on social networks? Unless you actually do worship him.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:00 PM
1

just follow him on social media.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:58 AM
0

Please all remember he used to claim gamers were pedophiles until he got the job as tech-reporter for the right-wing rag Breitbart. I would suggest the last thing we need is someone like Milo jumping on the bandwagon with this cause and then proclaiming himself to be the figurehead. he will do the MRM immense damage. Check-out the high volume of trolling he does with anyone who claims to be a feminist. He sat back watching the MRM grow and now he is getting involved now our issues are starting t…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:57 AM
1

Isn't he part-Jewsish or part-Greek, maybe a little of both? He seems to be whatever he wishes to be from one day to the next.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:53 AM
0

that's my point. I have met many MRA's who love him because he likes to fight against feminists but he very rarely argues in favour of men's rights. I agree that most of us don't worship him but it feels that way sometimes. I think he's toxic and makes us look bad. He's mixing a campaign for free speech in with MRM simply because he is using anything he can to attack feminists. The vibe I get from this community is that we are not here to attack feminists. We're not political and that most of us…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:37 PM
3

I was getting fed-up with the regular attacks on men in the Guardian newspaper comment sections and noticed how there were plenty of people commenting on how they too were fed-up. Then one day someone slagged off the MRM. I did my research and found this sub.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:43 PM
4

How does one successfully campaign against societal double-standards without actually alluding to said standards? If we are all to assume that whatever we were thinking 'goes without saying' then there is little point in saying anything. We can all find a new hobby and stop wasting our time with this equality nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:27 PM
1

I don't believe it. They focus on accused, which proves nothing. We all know the truth about this. They even begin with the classic line 'contrary to popular perception'. They know this is dodgy and will simply muddy the waters of our understanding of this subject.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:38 AM
-1

I asked 'Anyone here concerned about circumcision and the right of boys to genital integrity?'. Judging by your answer I will take it as a no then.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 04:59 PM
-1

been here everyday for over a year. supposition not your strong point eh?
/r/MensRights28/10/15 04:57 PM
1

food and kid's clothes
/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:39 AM
7

you couldn't sound more negative and defeatist if you tried.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:38 AM
2

i don't have much hope the bbc will be gender neutral here, but even if we give them the benefit of the doubt, why should we be so happy with this? the bbc continually plays politics with these issues, always ignoring the true picture to push their feminist narrative. why should we we grateful when they occasionally act with honesty and integrity?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:47 PM
3

coercing a woman to have sex while she is drunk is rape? this is one of those guys who thinks the only thing we can offer men and boys is a lecture on how to be nice to women.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 12:06 PM
2

i guess this has been posted because it's nice to see men's health being talked about in the media for a change, but the whole tone is wrong. We shouldn't be telling men it's embarrassing but don't worry we'll help you'. We should be fighting against a media and society that thinks it's embarrassing/funny in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 02:34 PM
1

yes, it's an annoying a sponsored link for something
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:01 AM
1

the MRM only looks bad if you read the guardian and such like. case in point, today the guardian attempted to link us with white supremacists. they will do anything to discredit us.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:05 PM
6

newspaper claims 'False rape accusations are rare'. not sure I agree with that
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:02 PM
1

disagree. says drinking makes it more likely she will be rapes. false. more likely she will claim she has been raped. big difference. this is bad cod science. gives social sciences a very bad name.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:54 PM
1

I think we need to find, support and encourage journalists already on the inside of mainstream media who are by and large on our side, like Milo and Daubney.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:26 PM
1

exactly. I think we need to be politically savvy. We need to sit, wait and watch. Kind of like a game of chess.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:24 PM
1

I disagree. People like Martin Daubney (Sky News, Daily Telegraph) and Milo Yiannopoulos (Breitbart) regularly speak out on our issues, they just don't call themselves MRAs. Milo was in the USA recently engaging in the rape culture debate and generally upsetting the SJW types and Martin is always writing about men's issues, in particular mental health and also the failure of boys in schools. They are both free men, not shackled by the political or any other trappings that members of certain MRA …
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:20 PM
1

she gets invited onto light-entertainment shows and is introduced as a broadcaster and then spends the whole interview promoting her feminism.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 09:55 AM
1

very true. every chance she gets she talks about ans is never challenged by the interviewer. everything she says is taken as fact.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 09:54 AM
2

she is leader of a feminist political party!
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:36 PM
-1

Couldn't imagine Fry identifying as a feminist given that he suffers from mental health issues and he is a white gay man. He is also a best friend of Paul Gambaccini and was publicly critical of the way he'd been treated regarding the sexual assault hysteria and its effects on innocent men. Either way, they don't seem to like him: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/oct/31/stephen-fry-twitter-newspaper-article-women
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:33 PM
3

the point of meeting here is to get ideas and to understand what is going on at the moment. The lack of actual action is due in most part to the fact once you let your co-workers or fellow students know you're MRA you are quickly uninvited to parties and such like. Whilst I am not ashamed of being an MRA I am politically savvy enough to know there are ways of doing things. Less is more etc.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:21 PM
1

reading most of the jovial comments on here it is clear that this community is going downhill very fast!
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:19 PM
8

I had noticed that during Mental Health Day most media treated it as a gender-less problem. If anything, stories about female sufferers appeared to be disproportionately high.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 09:57 PM
1

could be wrong but it looks like both cancer and heart disease affects a great number and % of men
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:19 PM
1

deaths by gender UK and USA http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa-cause-of-death-by-age-and-gender http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/mortality-statistics--deaths-registered-in-england-and-wales--series-dr-/2012/sty-causes-of-death.html
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:18 PM
1

who are you talking to?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:39 PM
0

what is the contradiction? it's a fact. out of what is considered the 4 big roles, all went to men but a majority of posts in total went to women.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:48 PM
1

quite clearly states that contrary to popular belief, women are affected equally to men. there is an entire page and special infographic made just to highlight ithttp://www.world-heart-federation.org/what-we-do/awareness/world-heart-day/materials-and-resources/infographic
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:45 PM
1

they are one of a small number of universities that offered to be part of the heforshe campaign http://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/press/press-releases/2015/september/un-women-launches-heforshe-getfree-tour-at-university-of-leicester
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:12 PM
7

if there are seriously some, perhaps many members of the MRM here who believe it's ok to murder convicts, then perhaps some of the criticism levelled at our community about it being filled with thugs and nutters have some merits. disgusted that people here would advocate such a blatant breach of the spirit of justice and due process.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:07 PM
1

When the most famous man of peace upsets you, you probably need to take a break from your social activism.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:28 PM
1

the point is that anything they do gets reported by the media. the more we draw attention to this the better. anything we do gets totally ignored, just like the issues we care about. they come up with a new hashtag campaign and it becomes the lead article in most journals whereas anything we do gets criticized as evidence we are all just at home and never do anything of substance.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:58 AM
1

your first reply suggested this was not a men's rights issue and should not have posted because young men on bikes dying is neither sexist nor gendered. You implied that I thought it was sexist. I don't. That's the whole point. I don't think it must be to appear here. If it affects men and nobody cares about it, it's a men's rights issue but it's not sexist nor gendered. the point is, nobody cares because the primary victims are men. same goes for military conscription, prison rape, the issues f…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:46 AM
1

don't be an idiot. you've created a straw man and I won't waste much time arguing with you. nobody said that the fact that 85% of cyclists involved in accidents are men is sexist, or requires boys-specific solutions, only that it requires addressing as an issue and should be a priority. it's the very fact that a disproportionate number of victims is male that makes it all the more pressing. you've turned it into a gendered issue not me. you are clearly the type of MRA who only looks out for adve…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 12:15 AM
1

so therefore do nothing? since when has being over represented in a demographic been reason for not including something in the MRM?given the resources targeted at problems affecting women I would argue that it is exactly this sort of thing that MRM should be campaigning for. What else are you against? a campaign to get the government to spend more money on military vets because most are men? are you against the campaign to force the government to give greater rights to Fathers because they are a…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:18 PM
1

now you ask, yes there is. hence I posted it here. you don't think there is a right not to be killed on the roads just because of your gender? you don't think the government should be targeting resources at this problem?
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:03 PM
7

will never happen in the UK
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:56 PM
1

quote from the article: Frequently, there is not a clear victim or a clear perpetrator: Professor Murray Straus’s research revealed that violence is often ‘mutual’, and a surprisingly similar proportion of women and men use violence against their partner. Crime statistics show that one in seven men are abused by a partner or ex-partner (although since men are usually stronger than women, they tend to inflict far greater physical harm).
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:30 PM
5

so a male lawyer or any other professional goes into the office everyday looking scruffy and he doesn't get judged? or he chooses to not wear a tie because it's a very hot day and the women are already complaining about the air conditioning being set too high and he doesn't get judged? I take it you have never ever worked in an office environment. The need to conform to a very rigid dress code or face the consequences has always been greater for men.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:25 PM
0

actually, whilst your point is valid, in the year I have been on this sub-reddit, everyone has told me to do it in order to prevent the media organisation from making money from the clicks.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:21 PM
1

So men are not judged on their appearance? you haven't read any Jane Austen books then clearly.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:20 PM
1

this is the bbc. There is no need to archive it. It has no commercial gain. If anything, the more widely read and circulated the article, the greater chance that the issue of male objectification and the double standards of society will be talked about. If you archive everything, there is no measurement of it ever having been read.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:18 PM
2

most of the comments on the article are along the lines of Valenti bringing trolling on herself because she is basically trolling the world. this is priceless.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:22 PM
5

in addition to all the excellent points made in the article, there is the additional problem for boys who will also be deterred because of the risk of false accusation. There is also evidence of a growing revolt by male students in USA who are being forced to go through a 'masculinity deprogramming' before they earn a right to attend their college. The college consent classes appear to be in line with feminist theory.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:36 PM
1

what you mean with your question is that the issue of rape and the effects of rape laws on men can't be a matter of public debate anymore because the feminists say so and you have no problem with that
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:32 PM
0

This is not an ageism case, it's about the need to have even more women (albeit old ones) on TV. You are in favour of gender quotas for TV? What about the workplace or Parliament? Golf clubs or football presenters on TV? Slippery slope.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:31 PM
2

and I'm not a dude
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:35 PM
1

uplifting news and men's rights in the same sentence? how is that possible? if we were using this sub to celebrate how many rights we had then great, but the point is we don't have any
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:32 PM
5

avoid the groups which try to tackle the various so-called toxicity of males and you'll be fine. there are some groups which follow feminist theory but you will probably know one when you encounter it if you have any aptitude at all for men's rights. a good start would be to avoid confrontation for the sake of it but whatever you do don't be ashamed of your beliefs.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:08 PM
6

The Sky News newspaper review says that the Sunday Times (the final edition of which hasn't been printed yet) will report on Sunday that a UK government secretary of state is claiming 1 in 7 UK female University students has been seriously sexually assaulted and he is demanding that all UK universities have an urgent investigation to find out the link between lad culture and sexual assault in higher education. Exactly what do you not understand about that? I have reported what I heard on a live …
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:59 AM
21

a quick scan of the NSW police press office reveals that there have been a couple of these child approach incidents. they seem quite common but I only found one which appeared to be sexual. there was one case where a girl was asked to get in the car and a case of exposure. but seriously, the way these things are reported you'd thing every guy in the country was doing something bad and must be dealt with by sending all the boys to anti-rape sex ed classes and by locking up all the men and brainwa…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:37 AM
2

no time for trolls. if however you are genuine and you aren't aware of the gross discrimination faced by men I think you need to go do some research and ask yourself where the hell you've been all this time. you clearly don't read anything.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 10:55 PM
2

of course some ill-educated women are worried. they are supposed to be. that is the message being spread by feminists.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 10:53 PM
0

one would hope you are using sarcasm. otherwise you have a problem.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:01 PM
1

why is the article posted with archive? surely anything which highlights people who are fighting against the feminist-establishment need to be free to go viral?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:33 AM
4

This new money is.......built on steps taken by the government to end domestic violence, support victims and ensure offenders are prosecuted. These include: £40 million for Violence Against Women and Girls support services and specialist helplines new laws and powers - including a new domestic abuse offence to capture coercive and controlling behaviour, the criminalisation of forced marriage, and the introduction of new stalking laws the national roll-out of domestic violence protection orders a…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:33 PM
0

i would say you sound like a feminist. please tell me you're not. support for female victims is thus: all the money, time and resources go to them and men get next to nothing. the allocation of this new fund will mostly go to women. we all know that.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:21 PM
6

the psychology industry has done more than most professions to paint men as evil and women as the victims. these kinds of articles are a little too late.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:50 PM
3

I couldn't believe the scene where they have a rogues gallery of different vaginas. The boy is asked which he prefers and states he prefers bald to bushy then gets lots of shit from the teacher because he chose the wrong one!
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:40 AM
5

Doesn't matter what he says, most people still assume that when you have a male victim, the person who did it was male. nothing changes. Good example of female rape is the UK series Sea Of Souls. i think the episode with Doctor Who actor Peter Capaldi features a rape scene. They start having sex, he says no, he wants her to stop. She is on top. She continues. It's rape, but the prosecution in the UK would never see it as rape and the male victim probably wouldn't even think he was a victim. http…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 10:34 PM
3

I've just read some of the crap on their website. This is a pro-man organisation?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 07:14 AM
17

those on here who argue that circumcision wasn't promoted in the past to stop boys masturbating demonstrate how poorly they have been educated. Of course it was to impede their sexual desire. In that sense it is the same as FGM. The main point however is that a victim can't consent and for this reason it is child abuse.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:56 PM
29

I would never condone lawbreaking, but (in theory) given the choice between getting into legal trouble for filming without consent and risking being the victim of a false rape accusation and knowing I can't prove a negative, I know which I would prefer.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:47 PM
4

I am not sure that false allegations are rare. Add to this the facts that (at least in the UK) (a) only a man is legally capable of rape (b) only women need to ask for consent (c) women are probably more likely to think they are a victim in the first place, I think we need to take the gender out of this and ensure due process or natural justice and then everyone is protected.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:00 AM
2

In particular, the new study consisted only of samples from two universities, both in the Southeast, which may bias results. which MAY bias results? This is bad science. Makes the entire psychology discipline look a total joke if they are arguing this is scientific! 1 in 10? that is a joke!!
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:16 PM
4

If ever we needed proof that Daily Mail is against the MRM this is it.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:20 PM
11

i would complain to my line manager.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:11 PM
2

Whatever your thoughts on abortion, it is something a woman choses for herself. spoken like a true feminist.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 03:19 PM
6

it wasn't a very long essay but he basically argues that anything these days can cause people to rant and proves it by ranting about MRA's?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:59 PM
2

Andrew Bridgen, Tory MP for North West Leicestershire, sums it up quite nicely...‘These UN officials are being funded by our taxpayer-funded UK contributions to generate this drivel.' ‘Rather than criticising us, she should take a look at the rest of the world such as the Middle East, where violence against women is a much greater problem.' ‘Millions of people are voting with their feet to try to get in here, so the UN should take a long hard look at what is going on in the rest of the United Na…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:56 PM
5

this wouldn't stand up in court. it's a survey. no wonder social science has such a bad reputation. asking women over the phone if they've had unwanted sexual whatever doesn't prove anything. certainly not 1 in 5 which we all know is as dodgy as dodgy gets. you'd have better luck finding WMDs in Iraq.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:03 PM
5

If a woman has been arrested for a non-bailable offence of serious nature e.g an offence punishable by death penalty, the court is empowered to grant her bail. ?????
/r/MensRights13/06/15 11:10 PM
6

don't fully get what MGTOW is about, but if a guy decided to focus on himself and his studies/career rather than wasting his time in class showing off to impress and/or sucking up to females to get laid, then I am all for that.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 01:09 PM
-2

is absolutely no reason women dont want equality, they want more. thats the point
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:58 PM
3

i think you're wrong there. a family has a patriarch and a matriarch, each with specific roles. why is it only patriarchy which is bad? without debating freud with you, why exactly do we never say matriarchy is bad? a government is not a patriarchy just because most of the current employees at the top are male.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:49 PM
2

both men and women can do work. in most other areas women control their own lives. where is the patriarchy exactly?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:47 PM
1

depends what you think the patriarchy is and who benefits from it. most feminists claim patriarchy causes all of the bad things. you can't believe that surely?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:46 PM
4

lack of reproductive rights for men is not caused by patriarchy. It's caused by only giving those rights to women. This goes for so many other issues.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:45 PM
2

I agree. the problem here is that lots of people are studying this theory and it's all academic. We can debate the pros and cons of something in an academic way but the response from the feminists who are fighting the patriarchy is that whilst we can, should and must start work today on fixing the problems women have we can't address men's issues until each and every problem woman have has been dealt with.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:44 PM
5

imagine if the guy had kidnapped the kid. they'd have sent the SAS after him.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:45 PM
6

Make sure you keep an eye on that Martin Daubney. Regularly on Sky News and although admits he is not an MRA, he is very much on our side! he has also been having a public spat with that horrible feminist girl. he writes good stuff... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11587324/Why-doesnt-society-care-about-male-rape.html
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:44 PM
30

she is a 16 year old black female feminist writer for a left wing rag. What in the crap would she know about MRA? She spends the entire article dismissing every MRM issue then complains all MRA's do is spend their time being anti-woman.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:39 PM
1

i agree, it sounds to me like the writer is saying that we are the underdogs, a minority, without any sympathy from anyone.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:05 PM
1

this is actually an excellent point i hadn't thought of. why should women have the vote when they can't be sent tom war. i have never considered any arguments against votes for women, but logically, only people (men) who can be forced to go to war should have the vote.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:03 PM
1

wow. I normally like that website for the way it has been fighting the absurd campus rape stuff but that article could have been written by germain greer or harriot harmon.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:52 PM
7

A 2009 study found up to 64,000 women in the UK are ‘child-sex offenders’, though it’s estimated there are just hundreds in jails as opposed to thousands of male sex offenders. and will anything be done about this? probably not.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 07:21 PM
47

part of the punishment for adults who have sex with kids is that you are 'branded' a rapist or pedo or whatever. One of the many reasons why men and women are unequal before the law is that women are very rarely labelled these terms and therefore never have to deal with the shame.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:24 PM
5

the article starts off by saying that if a woman chooses not to have a job, she will be good at housework/caring and do more of it than men. If she chooses to get a job she will be more likely to get one as she can use her skills in areas such as health and education. If a guy chooses to stay at home is lazy and if he chooses to get a job he will be less likely to get one. Then it says men must adapt and change. Sounds like all the benefits of this new world order go to women and there is very l…
/r/MensRights31/05/15 07:47 AM
2

given the far-reaching effects this paper seems to have on government policies, it's surprising how small the actual readership is.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:44 AM
1

but this is a clickbait article that is total crap
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:25 PM
1

may just be completely irresponsible based on what?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:24 PM
5

we must put girls at the center of development and public policies??? she would love that!
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:04 PM
1

If such a list were to exist, it would have to be accusations that were proven false beyond doubt and not simply cases lacking evidence. EVERYBODY deserves to be innocent until proven guilty. doesn't your second sentence contradict the first? have you got a higher standard for people accused of making false allegations of rape than people accused of rape? Either you are found not-guilty or you're not.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:41 AM
2

of course. The list would have to curated from court reports. The problem is, even when a man is found innocent, neither the police nor feminists like the person who made the allegation to be labelled a false accuser. Although logic tell you in law they must be, it is an allegation you are making against someone and there could be legal consequences. Personally, I think once the accused has been proven not-guilty then it should be ok to label the accusation as false.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:40 AM
1

she accepts that sexual assault doesn't meet the same standard as rape then says most rapes outside of prison are against women, totally avoiding the issue of the problem with rape definition. The problem with this article is either way, it claims the majority of rapists are men
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:37 AM
2

she says her offensive stuff about Mexicans, gets a stunned reaction and then goes on to talk about vulnerable groups being women and children. For a conservative, she sounds like a feminist to me.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:34 AM
3

did not know that. lost count of how many times people say you should use donotlink
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:01 PM
2

the state is not the judge. haven't you studied law?
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:59 PM
3

move along? are you serious? you sound like you think the victim deserved it.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:59 PM
6

don't accept that. the state often prosecutes male suspects of rape/domestic violence where the victim has failed to bring a complaint. besides, in this case the state wanted extra time but the judge said no.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:57 PM
1

you are using the word incorrectly We are talking about paedophiles who have committed crimes. The issue isn't whether you can be prosecuted for thought crimes. You can very well argue against sentencing pedophiles to prison.... Not a single person has done that. The entire issue is about government desire to beef-up sentences for online abusers but lack of interest in even considering (for example) rape as a female crime, with all the social connetations that brings.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 07:40 AM
13

I like that you are being positive about the possibility but whenever I have read something where a feminist tries to answer specific MRM issues, they nearly always (a) dispute MRM stats, or (b) assuming they accept the stats, claim it's the fault of the patriarchy for everything
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:35 AM
1

that was my entire line of argument - that the government is just cleaning up the edges of the law and what is really required is root and branch reform. My interest in this issue all along has not so much been a sense of vengeance or retribution against the offender (male or female) but that all victims regardless of gender should be treated the same. I say male or female offenders but at the moment we know female offenders can't be guilty of an act of rape even when they've actually committed …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:21 AM
1

Of course not. I said that because I wanted to make it clear I wasn't a cheerleader for the updated definition (given that it is only slightly better than the old one) but you did seem to disagree with me that there had even been an update. The important thing is that as poor as it was, it was an update. It doesn't go anywhere near far enough to deliver the justice male victims require, but I see the glass being half-full here. Rape definitions can be updated. Who'd have thought it?
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:12 AM
1

It wasn't my plan to defend the FBI and I know the definition is still letting down male victims of rape by females but the old definition had the words “The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will” and excluded male victims totally. The new definition does at-least include male victims and uses words like “his/her”. I know it really only refers to anal rape and doesn't really address situations where women have sex with a man without his consent. I think this is known as enve…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 11:58 PM
1

I think their only interest is to have the veneer that they are doing something. Keep in mind Cameron was waging his fake war on internet porn not so long ago. Parents groups love him for his stance on child protection, even if his policies don't do anything to actually protect anyone. It looks good. That's all.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 11:30 PM
1

The epidemic of cases of female teachers abusing school boys has been well documented but in the USA there is a greater willingness (noting a few bad cases where the judge/cops refer to the woman being a cougar etc) to regard the female as a rapist. The FBI helpfully updated the definition of rape to include women offenders. USA is ahead of the UK on this.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 11:26 PM
1

The election was only two weeks ago and already as new Lord Chancellor Michael Gove has announced on behalf of the government 2 specific areas of criminal justice he wishes to reform: further strengthening of sentences for people who are guilty of child abuse and revenge porn. We already know from the leader of Fathers For Justice that he was told by Iain Duncan Smith (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions) that men's rights are regarded by government as a taboo subject. I wasn't trying to ru…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 11:16 PM
2

Bringing up harsher terms for pedos just makes it sound like you think it's a bad thing. Didn't you read my first line? Longer sentences for people who abuse kids online. Who could argue with that? At no point was I anywhere near saying longer sentences for child abusers was a bad thing. You just totally mis-represented what I said and put words into my mouth. Your attempt to do so almost appears to be an attempt to transfer whatever angst or awkwardness you have about this issue over to me. Bes…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:18 PM
2

that was my point. I was challenged by someone to point to the stats which prove my point, but my point is in uk law a woman can't physically commit rape. how can we possibly debate stats when a particular act doesn't exist because of the ridiculously narrow definition which excludes women?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:33 PM
3

omg. a guy has luck dating a foreign girl and you want to stomp all over it? can't we just add to to the collective as a textbook case that some guys do have luck with women and that it goes to prove the problem is with feminists and not women? Must we sub-categorize everything? gets to a point where there are so many subs you forget where you started. let's just be happy for the guy!
/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:31 PM
1

if you are happy, go for it. you are no more at risk of getting stung by her than a girl from your own country. good luck.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:28 PM
1

didn't understand your point at all
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:30 PM
1

I totally get that the police failed in their duty to collect DNA because perhaps they saw her as an unreliable witness and not worth bothering with, but it's the fact that she only got the money through complaining to the European court of human rights that has me puzzled. It isn't clear exactly what the money is for.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:56 PM
1

you've expressed what i wanted to say perfectly.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:09 PM
2

has anyone actually complained about this using the official procedure? isn't there a way to do it in a block/class-action type of thing, rather than the people dealing with the complaints having to spend all day replying to the complaints one by one? keep in mind regardless the outrage we have for the judge, we need to keep the people dealing with the complaints sweet.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:50 PM
3

not exactly the ones I referred to, but a quick sample: TAMPONS https://www.change.org/p/help-the-homeless-on-their-period-thehomelessperiod?source_location=trending_petitions_home_page&algorithm=curated_trending VICTIM BLAME https://www.change.org/p/jeremy-hunt-nhs-home-office-remove-all-copies-of-this-victim-blaming-poster END DETENTION OF FEMALE ASYLUM SEEKERS https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-british-home-secretary-end-the-detention-of-women-who-seek-asylum?source_location=trending_petiti…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:37 PM
2

I totally agree. The Guardian is a case in point. They know their articles get the MRM going.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:26 PM
1

love women, oppose the political ideology that is feminism. Feminists claim to speak on behalf of women. They do not represent women. They serve only themselves. We can't as a movement blame women for what the feminists do and day. If we don't focus on that, MRM is doomed!
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:15 PM
1

This will be very bad news for those campaigning across the world to end conscription. The fact that Harry doesn't mind if women are forced to risk killing themselves too is no sweetener for me in a suggestion that I think will send out a really bad message to those countries which currently jail men who try to dodge the draft. Frankly, I can see the Tories making this law but they are very unlikely to force women to join. The left-wing Tory Heseltine has already spoken out against it, which say…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:12 PM
2

no, but the law does exist in statute.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 12:34 AM
2

I think the Telegraph only recently had an article telling you that having sex with a girl after telling her you are rich is technically rape. (assuming you lied about being rich)
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:44 PM
16

domestic violence not an issue?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:46 PM
14

In most cases, the relationship will be between current or former partners; the abuser will be male and the victim female. But our definition also includes male victims abused by females. sounds like the CPS have made up their minds about the gender of the victims
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:44 PM
15

this last bit worries me.... Later, Larkin’s boss, Chadwick, explained that less than 3% of all rape reports received by GMP turn out to be fabricated. But unlike other forces, GMP has never prosecuted a victim for making a false allegation. Instead, they have dished out the odd fixed-penalty fine for wasting police time. “The numbers are very low,” said Chadwick. “One of the considerations is the vulnerability of the victim. Generally those people making false reports have some sort of vulnerab…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:05 AM
1

personally, as a rule of thumb, I am anti-feminist regardless of whatever version of it you are promoting. Ice-cream comes in many flavours but if you don't like ice-cream then that's that. Besides, my interest in MRM is not about hating feminists but about promoting men's rights. Whether I have the wrong idea about feminism or not is irrelevant. My interest is not with feminism but the impact the application of it has had on the rights of men. I couldn't care less what anyone thinks about femin…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:32 PM
10

don't waste your time getting angry. these guys need a few lessons on biology, evolution and some sex-ed classes if they don't get why nipples have sexual connotations.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:31 PM
2

she is certainly certifiable.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:28 PM
2

wow. she is seriously sick. a guy is passively sexist because he doesn't follow women on twitter? the men in the white coats will be coming for her.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:27 PM
7

A quote from Dr Heather Brunskell-Evans, senior research fellow at the University of Leicester and spokeswoman for Resist Porn Culture??? If ever there were proof that not all research is serious.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:42 PM
1

sounds like a data protection to me.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:37 PM
-2

maybe, maybe? there is no evidence according to the police. case closed. she lied.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:38 PM
3

Justice For Men And Boys have rights of the unborn as part of their founding principles.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:17 AM
10

Evidence I think that not only are feminists telling lies about wanting to protect all victims, but also that in order to keep all the government funding for themselves they'll do anything.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:03 PM
3

I am not into all the bitch gossipy ranting in this article. I tried to follow and I couldn't understand it. It was like a gender version of a football/party-political analysis. is the article in favour of MRM, against or what?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:30 PM
5

because it's so obvious why he's doing it
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:15 AM
6

i know. the point I was making is that it's a perfect example of how a false allegation results in the police making yet another statement on why we must protect women from harm even when nothing happened in that particular case. it keeps the rape epidemic myth going. a typical MRA will be well aware of all the allegations/investigations which get dropped but a typical news reader/viewer only hears about the initial report and very often never hears that it was false. innocently they will walk a…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:49 PM
7

i think any example of a guy/gal telling guys how they should treat the ladies totally belongs on here. the readers here can make their own judgement as to the merits.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:33 PM
11

I always get panned for mentioning O'Reilly from Fox News but whilst he isn't MRA he is sympathetic to the MRM. Whenever he has covered the story of MRA getting abused by feminist protestors he has always supported the right of MRA to hold public meetings to discuss their issues. The liberal MRA's on here don't like me mentioning Fox news.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:01 PM
18

police were adamant they didn’t want the outcome to dissuade people reporting similar incidents????? nothing happened. didn't she make the whole thing up?
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:15 PM
1

they did a lot of good exposing the corruption of western governments but they have let themselves down with their gender agenda!
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:37 AM
5

reputable media sites the guardian??????
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:36 AM
2

couldn't care less what you're concerned with. I prefer to fight for boy's and men's rights in all issues not just those you approve of.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:04 PM
0

never fails to amaze me how so-called MRA's bend over backwards to give women the benefit of the doubt when abortion-related issues come up. Seems many people who claim to be MRA just will not budge on this. Justice For Men And Boys refers specifically to abortion and Foetal alcohol syndrome and alcohol related problems as boy's and men's rights issues worth fighting for. The right not to be poisoned is a human right whether you think a woman has a right to choose or not.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:03 PM
2

if a woman giving a boy brain damage doesn't scream MTA I don't know what does you dolt
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:51 PM
8

The girls who sent them were verbally reprimanded but not suspended. I guess the boys would not have been in trouble had they only received them and reported them to the teacher. If they then distributed them then that is technically 'making child porn' and it makes sense they got into much bigger trouble. However, on that basis, the boys are also victims because they were sent the photos in the first place. It's a big mess because basically when a boy and girl get caught up in this kind of stuf…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:02 AM
1

I am always getting carefully worded comments deleted. It doesn't matter if you do your best to avoid profanities, abuse etc. as certain viewpoints are off-limits and will be deleted, for example, if you attempt to debate the 1 in 5 myth. I don't bother commenting on that newspaper anymore.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:51 PM
26

how about innocent until proven guilty? perhaps believe the innocent. just sayin.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:01 AM
1

I've been on here since about October and have only seen one or two articles. One was about a nation (not sure which) considering the draft for men and women in the name of equality and one about a debate on a USA veterans blog.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:51 PM
5

the book is great but it's a shame that the article in that newspaper uses the opportunity to rubbish the entire mra movement with her sarcasm and indifference.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:04 PM
1

i disagree. under the heading 'body image' and for that matter mental health issues/suicide I would say it is bang on an MRA/MRM issue. Do we have data on the % of men who kill themselves because of psychological abuse from their wives regarding penis size? Assuming we don't have that data, let's assume regardless of how petty a reason it may seem, many men do.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:54 PM
8

it's total crap. all that stuff about asking for consent applies to both men and women but when we have feminists saying things like 'women can't be guilty of rape under uk laws' (suggesting by definition women do not need to obtain consent) it shows that there is a clear political agenda here.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:32 PM
2

David Letterman regularly claims that those with traditional right wing views are too intelligent to believe the crap they say. Actually, I think it's liberal people like Stewart who are too intelligent to believe the words coming out of their own mouths. No way can he really believe it.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:05 PM
2

the bbc has no commercial or market considerations. They can upset or offend half its customers and there is no consequence. Just wait until it gets privatized.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:17 PM
1

has the article been changed. I am sure it was more anti-mrm when I first read it
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:04 PM
11

On the one hand the poster only assumes women can be raped, but on the plus side I am glad the Police are starting to suggest that women need to be more responsible.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:23 PM
20

didn't exactly say sorry for what she actually did - told a false story and hurt a lot of innocent people.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:46 AM
7

totally agree. I first became aware of this shaming tactic when I watched the Paul Gross movie 'Passchendaele' http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1092082/
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:45 AM
0

and?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:54 PM
0

Who could possibly answer that?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:53 PM
2

I totally agree. It was a long time ago but I recall being a kid and I never had any worries about addicted to anything. The thought of feeling guilty or worried about porn wouldn't have occurred to me. There were things I loved doing and things I hated.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:33 PM
-1

he's probably just annoyed and frustrated that he looks really old now. I guess when you are a celebrity and you lose your sex appeal you kinda turn into a feminist. how else can you expect to be adored by the women?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:23 PM
2

this kind of poster is kind of being facetious. I think that's what really angers me more than the sexism against men.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:21 PM
3

Article includes comments from Sarah Green, acting director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition even though there is no causal link between porn and violence.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:14 PM
2

the BPS (British Psychological Society) regularly publishes this kind of crap.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:36 AM
1

it's always the same - when women act badly it's the fault of the man, he is probably abusing her mentally or physically. when men cheat it's because they are shitty humans. the big problem is the kind of logic the writer of that article uses is now being taught in schools as part of sex, relationship and consent classes.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:35 AM
2

how is this a feminist issue?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:32 AM
2

the perfect birth control for men has always been masturbation. feminists don't like the idea that with some men, they can't control them with sex and it upsets them. That's why feminists by and large oppose all forms of pornography. It takes away their power and control over men.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:38 AM
1

19.3% of women and 1.7% of men have been raped during their lifetimes? No way can the figure for men be so low.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:07 PM
3

I think something as a collective must be done. With due respect to the Justice For Men And Boys party in the UK, I think we must push for change on issues such as mental health and the gradual erosion of men's rights in areas such as justice, parenting, health and education without attacking people. I think avoiding politics at all times, avoiding confrontation, staying focused on the issues and calling out organizations and public bodies when they breach our rights is the best step. I think wh…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:22 AM
3

hard to believe they have in the coalition government here in the uk for 5 years already.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:17 AM
28

very good article by Mike. Great summary of modern problems faced by men and how not only is the government causing most of them via programmes to help women but they even get the money to pay for it mostly from men.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 08:18 AM
1

haha thanks. had a good laugh at some of those insane motions!
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:42 AM
-6

you are saying you agree with FGM too?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:38 AM
1

can't believe after an investigation in which no evidence was found, the police spokesman said that doesn't mean something terrible didn't happen to the girl, but that it means that they were simply unable to gather the facts.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 06:58 AM
2

i gave up reading after: 'Men’s rights groups have become louder, and while the anger they direct at feminists for a bunch of imagined crimes is laughable, on the issue of fathers not being taken seriously enough by society, they have a point.'
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:38 AM
8

Nationally, an estimated 78,000 people are victims of rape or attempted rape each year, of which around 9,000 are thought to be men. that I assume doesn't take in to account men who awake to find they are being raped by a woman
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:34 AM
7

it's Charlie Brooker. that's all you need to know.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:21 PM
3

Just noticed the following day is a scripted drama called 'Murdered by my boyfriend.' What is the national broadcaster playing at with all this crap?
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:46 AM
6

it is sexist but you can also get obama toilet paper. make of that what you will.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:11 AM
1

"I expect we will have males from same sex relationships but the pattern may be different to that for females," she said. so the assumption is that if a male is being abused it must be by another male?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:17 PM
1

michael douglas? didn't he blame his wife? there is real science behind this but the feminists have blocked it.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:43 PM
4

whenever a feminist guardian writer attempts to claim they have the moral ground just name-drop this woman
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:30 PM
12

she is pure evil scum.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:29 PM
-4

no offence, but the countries they always cite, like iceland or slovenia have never contributed anything to the world. god help us if usa and uk end up like them!
/r/MensRights12/03/15 10:36 PM
1

i noticed that. putting her down, calling her names, threatening to leave her... makes me a wife batterer! load of crap.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:44 PM
2

the problem here is that the model kind of explains the whole of feminist theory. men batter women to have power and control. problem is as we all know, that doesn't explain why up to half the perpetrators are women. explains why feminists will do everything they can to sit on any stats that show half the victims are men.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:41 PM
1

best thing on the site was this disclaimer: External Links Statistics Canada - Family Violence in Canada (Note: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external links.) I know CBC is very left wing, like the UK's BBC and they do tend to take the word of feminists, but in this article they appear to be just the messenger, except for the bit about the ad being controversial.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 08:01 PM
1

i agree with some of them. men clearly are made to feel unwelcome in mother and baby groups and in doing the school run. and
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:10 PM
2

I don't get why all the ango-saxon countries are like this.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:17 PM
2

the headline sounded like the huff post was mocking him but the article was actually quite supportive and seems to suggest there is another journalist on the staff who has devoted quite a lot of time to writing similar articles about this particular MRA issue.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:09 PM
0

on such an occasion who exactly is going to make the complaint. if the guy she is with is in a similar situation, we should go after him? doesn't she have to ask him for his consent too?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:42 PM
4

it really pisses me off that the line taken by officials again and again is that although we know men are victims they are not coming forward, so we will stick to the stats and only help the women who come forward because we know they do so in greater numbers.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 09:20 PM
3

the problem, as with SJW attempts to get the next Doctor [Who] to be a woman is that it will put off boys and men watching it and women won't be watching it because they have no interest in it. Do these idiots seriously think women don't go into science because they are being stopped by patriarchy. Women find science boring. they want nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:38 PM
8

i am all for due process or natural justice, but the double standards thing really gets to me
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:06 AM
3

i can't believe the shit that the media puts out these days
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:36 AM
2

what worries me a little is that these women are trying to sideline men completely. if we are not careful, in future the men will be 3rd or 4th class citizens. we defeated the nazis but this is a sickness that our society can't be cured of.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:29 AM
14

what I hate is that this is known but that charities, government and media all continue to conspire to push the narrative that only women are the victims and only men are the perpetrators.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:04 AM
2

he's on our side. he (unlike most news commentators) has no problem with MRA and had said so. don't be such a dick.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:52 PM
1

he joked that ladies should not be so. it's not a mistake. it's a good start.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:52 PM
1

the word of the day is misandrist and it was broadcast yesterday. that is the quote. having a day off are you?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:51 PM
5

i will kick things off then by demanding that both men and woemen must sign-up for military service and i am demanding my right to space in the lifeboat should by ship start sinking fast. also i must insist we must all bend over backwards to address the crisis of male teachers in primary school and we need to encourage more women to work in the dangerous occupations such as coal-mining and emergency rescue. starting to like this equality thing.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:42 AM
2

you're wrong on so many counts. point is that the kind of view we are talking about is actually used to shape public policy all over the west. a bigoted view today creates discrimination against men tomorrow. in the sense that babysitting is a job, it IS discrimination what we are talking about here.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:50 PM
3

agreed. make a list of men's rights we wish to fight for and fight for them without reference to how nasty and evil the feminazis are. if the feminists really believe in equality it's difficult to argue against things like shared parenting and the rule of law (due process in USA). being ant-feminist and making a point about it is a bit political and will not win mainstream support. just read the comments of people on the guardian CIF. they are sick of the anti-male rants but will never identify …
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:09 PM
2

the award thing we could do without. when the debate is focused on how men and women should be more responsible when having sex and the feminist says something like 'legally women can't rape', all you need from the MRA rep is logical and educated reference to how sexist the laws are. te lying feminist award kind of makes me embarrassed.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:04 PM
28

read the comments. people are so fed-up with this man-hating crap
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:33 PM
2

me neither, but if a suggestion is being made that there is a causal link between membership of or interest in MRA groups and the desire to kill I would be fascinated to see the data you have found.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:57 AM
0

THIS IS NOT RAPE A woman who had sex with a 15-year-old schoolboy has been warned she could face jail. sounds like rape to me. if not, the legal definition needs to be updated.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:03 PM
-4

there is no due process at issue here. she admitted having sex with a boy. did she not? the surprise is that she only 'may' go to jail. it's not a foregone conclusion.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:58 PM
9

one rule for women and another for men.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:41 PM
15

think you'll find men walking free as rare whereas women walking free is a given.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:37 PM
3

the comments appear to be less than impressed by the article.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 06:17 PM
3

sorry, I stopped reading when the writer quoted Labour MP Diane Abbott's take on what being a man is all about.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 06:13 PM
1

actually, the article appears to be totally pro-fatherhood and pro-family. I like the article as it points out how feminists are destroying both.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 10:10 PM
2

Thank you for such a comprehensive reply. The way you have put it makes me continue my belief that on balance, the system we have is still probably the best. Given the guidance you quoted above comes direct from the CPS I am slightly puzzled as to why the new DPP a few weeks ago came out with all guns blazing to announce something about dragging rape laws into the 21st century when actually, on paper at least, it sounds like the police and CPS do a relatively careful job already at ensuring all …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:19 PM
3

R v Bree [2007] appears to not accept that men can be the victim when he is drunk and has sex with a woman.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:06 PM
1

feminists are already on record as stating that a man withholding sex is guilty of abuse. I don't think they could give a toss when it's the other way 'round. There is a campaign in Africa where men are starting to use sex in this way. The local media effectively said the men were wrong to exercise control over their own sexuality in this way.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:15 PM
3

how on earth is a donation to that site tax deductible? are they a charity?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:59 PM
10

excellent article. a lot of the journalists on the telegraph are feminists but this one appears not to be. what he says makes total sense.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 11:54 AM
22

it looks a little fake. are you sure it's real? plus...cougarweb?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 08:18 PM
1

is this america? christ. means this is coming to england next!
/r/MensRights26/02/15 06:52 PM
5

people always tell me I am making it up when I say 40% of victims are male.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:10 PM
2

learn how studying sex and gender strengthens science. that is so funny
/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:19 AM
9

the gender is important as we hear again and again that the victims are girls and women. If we wish for government resources to be given to groups helping boys we need to get the message across about the gender of the victims, otherwise the victims will continue to be ignored. I would like a world where the gender didn't matter, but sadly, with that attitude, the assumption is always that the victims are female.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:16 PM
12

surely the point is to focus on the victims not the criminals. the feminists don't wish to accept that victims are often men or boys. instead they focus on their belief that the only part the male plays is in being the abuser.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:12 PM
18

it's all part of the narrative that evil men only rape for power. On that basis, men can't be raped by women.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:59 PM
4

I guess I have no problem with teaching kids about consent if it is applied to boys and girls. If the courses are basically about how boys abuse girls and what the girls can do to report what the boys are doing to them without any reference to male victims then this will be pointless and yet another political stunt. Anyone who argues only girls suffer unwanted sexual advances and that boys are never victims are on another planet.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:28 PM
1

believe the women very disturbing that the police have been politically corrupted by the feminists
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:59 PM
7

Women are more likely than men to stalk, attack and psychologically abuse their partners, according to a University of Florida study that finds college women have a new view of the dating scene. (from 2006) and still the media and government lies about it. why and how are they able to get away with it? http://news.ufl.edu/archive/2006/07/women-more-likely-to-be-perpetrators-of-abuse-as-well-as-victims.html
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:39 PM
1

charitable status and therefore taxpayer money is what keeps most of these politically motivated women's charities going. if you do the paperwork correctly, you can set up your own charity and give yourself a job running the thing. The whole charity system is rotten.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:34 PM
1

the old shouting fire analogy. totally a red herring.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:25 PM
1

what is this crap? the feminist manifesto? uk will out of eu very soon so it's one less thing to worry about.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:22 PM
1

i get it's a document. but it's not legal. so what's the problem. more euro crap. nothing new here.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:18 PM
2

ofcourse, but don't blame MRA. he's just a lout.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:45 PM
3

but this is the observer. they are obsessed by this crap.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:40 PM
5

what the little extract of the court documents we could see, seems he identified as an MRA because he felt he wouldn't get a fair hearing. The newspaper article makes it sound like MRA was the basis of his whole defense. I am sure he has had experience in many other areas but as he chose to mention MRA he has given ammo to anyone who wishes to attack MRA, when in fact it has nothing to do with the case.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:38 PM
1

putting all the morality mubo-jumbo crap aside, MRA is about rights. Nobody in the right mind will condone what he did. Of course this was posted by a sick troll to try to insinuate that MRA is essentially concerned with rights of abusive husbands. Won't even bother answering that. I wouldn't even attempt to assume I am fully briefed in the nature of this case. But just so you know, as a troll you're quite pathetic.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 01:06 PM
2

I agree. The feminists are showing out of touch they are with normal women.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:32 PM
4

If the men were unable to consent too did she rape them? exactly. this story goes to the heart of the problem of what happens if both the man and woman are drunk. the fact that there were 3 men is irrelevant. what if there had been 3 separate cases and the jury in each didn't know of the other accused? point is, the consent of the men appears to have been overlooked. if you can't give consent, then you can't give consent.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:29 PM
-1

A little caution and a little common sense is the best protection so why bother with MRA? let's all go home to a quiet life. quit society and stay at home forever. it's common sense surely.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:26 PM
4

dudes should start to realize the fire they are playing with when dealing with drunk chicks they want to fuck. isn't that kind of the point here? this was posted on this sub not to condemn the judgement or outcome, but as a warning to men. if our men and boys don't have a right to be educated on the dangers and lack of rights men have when they have sex with women, then what rights do they have? this is one area where nobody gives a crap about men and if you fall foul of the laws your life is ov…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:24 PM
6

don't be such an idiot. it's a link to a newspaper article and the title is taken verbatim from the newspaper. no judgement made, no editorial. Just the facts. what, MRA can't discuss current affairs now? If you can suggest one topic more directly related to MRA than this go ahead.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:09 PM
5

exactly. lots of people get drunk and can't remember things the next morning. if the deciding factor in whether or not you're rapist is if she can't remember, that puts every man who has sex with someone at great risk. If you know she's had 12 shots, maybe that's different, but just because she has no memory, should the state lock you up?
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:05 PM
2

so you are saying it doesn't matter if you get consent. If she doesn't remember, you're fucked, just deal with it?
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:01 PM
3

i know a good shrink.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:15 AM
1

sounds like you weren't acting great towards her. talk about salt and wound. how about we campaign for rights of boys and men and lay off the lecture crap? government via police has no right to tell us how to conduct relationships with people.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:50 PM
1

how can rape be worse than being robbed of your liberty and reputation by the state?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:35 PM
1

we shouldn't criminalize false rape accusations. eh? you mean we shouldn't convict people against whom false allegations are made or we shouldn't jail people who make those false allegations?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:34 PM
0

but being raped by a private citizen is not as bad as being jailed by the government after they have used the full weight and resources of the government machine to put you there.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:32 PM
2

for society and public policy, there is no greater concern than being deprived of your liberty by the state. That has been the case for more or less 800 years. Whilst the victim of rape deserves justice, due process is more important. If you are convicted of anything that you didn't do, something has gone wrong.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:30 PM
3

the bit about pedos and tories was editorial i think
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:33 PM
1

it's a pro choice ad about the anti abortion people. actually i agree with what the GOP guys are saying. i would vote for them no problem.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:30 PM
0

i am not going to waste my time watching this. i will assume he will say girls are suffering and more must be done.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:28 PM
2

she is totally full of crap.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:42 PM
1

i couldn't give a crap about them making money from ads. the point is surely that government makes policy after reading the guardian.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:34 PM
1

that link is to a purely anti-MRA site. why did you link it?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:33 PM
5

40% of the boys said they had served a female client wow. can't you read english?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:13 PM
3

I heard a lawyer say that due process was primarily for the accused not the so-called victim on the basis that even going back to Magna Carta, the biggest right one can have is to not have your liberty taken away from you by the state if you didn't do the crime. On that basis, the victim of a rape is less important.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:27 AM
3

what is with the ny post? they have lots of pro-man articles all the time. don't they know they are going against the traffic?
/r/MensRights09/02/15 11:19 PM
2

to be fair, isn't it the opinion of one writer at the student newspaper? Another wrote.....Due process duly needed at universities http://dakotastudent.com/5744/opinion/due-process-duly-needed-at-universities/
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:37 PM
-1

again...doesn't sound like MRA. what's your angle here?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:20 AM
2

if a woman doesn't want a child she can kill it but a guy must pay. you don't sound like MRA to me.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:19 AM
2

have you got any evidence that egalitarianism advocates rights for women and responsibilities for men? this group says if a drunk man and drunk woman have sex only the man is to blame? they argue that we should give all the top jobs in STEM, law and politics to women only to make up for hundreds of years of the patriarchy? really? you seriously think they want women to have more rights? I think you're confused.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:45 PM
1

i am as MRA as you can get and I kind of like sociology because they do raise some issues i wouldn't normally think about, but it's not the questions which worry me, it's the answers and solutions provided that worry me.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:19 PM
2

i don't pretty much care what sociologists say. it's all crap anyway.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:11 PM
3

so he thinks anyone of any gender can assume a masculine trait? what is this odd talk? if this is what sociology teaches, no wonder it is so discredited.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:11 PM
1

besides, i don't think science has proven that power is a masculine thing only.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:09 PM
2

I agree. The other commenter seemed to suggest that it's wrong to say most men could be rapists and women couldn't. but he went on to say that when women behave like men they can only be a potential rapist. so, basically, it's still blaming men and masculinity and is saying that basically men are all bad and women all good.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:08 PM
1

where did the 98% of rapists stat come from?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:04 PM
1

i agree. I find some of the questions quite interesting but it is wooly in the sense that the courses tend to be written by feminists and it isn't very objective. sometimes, you'd find it easier getting objective material from the guardian newspaper. I did find an objective undergrad book once, so it can be done. but some students find that their partivular course is riddled with anti-male sentiment. you'd have better luck finding the pro-patriarchy arguments in Wuthering Heights or Emma. but yo…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:03 PM
1

conservative sociologists who are not banging on about how evil patriarchy is do exist, but they find it quite tough getting into most high school curriculum.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:57 PM
1

but sociology isn't a real science. we all know that.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:56 PM
1

the great thing about feminists and sociologists is that they both ignore science. when you confront them with an argument based on science, they have nothing to say.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:54 PM
1

i do totally agree. simply accepting that men do not discriminate when they rape someone is hardly what we are looking for. unless people are willing to state that men and women can be both victims and perps then nothing will change. we need more academics to step up to the plate here.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:55 AM
1

I didn't know Florida was one of the first to recognize male rape. Did the speaker sound like she was happy to be regarded favorably by the MRA?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:52 AM
5

i still don't get this unequal thing. nobody has ever been able to convince me that the typical working class male (which comprises most men in the UK) has had it measurably better than the typical working class woman. can anyone name a few examples of this so-called inequality? sorry, having to stay at home to raise kids and miss out on a STEM career doesn't count. nor does any other lifestyle choice a woman freely makes with her boyfriend/husband.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:58 PM
2

in uk law, you can discriminate against men (women only this and that). you can't do the same with men's issues. I think women have all the help they need.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:59 PM
0

any idea how many women's rights groups there are? probably billions. why must we spend time on that too?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:58 PM
0

one of the main targets of feminism was to take away jobs from men and give them to women. you tell us.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:12 PM
7

please explain how working class men have in any way had a better deal than women. when I say working class men, I refer to most men. you sound like a raging feminist, which is sad. the party you refer to is great news as, just with UKIP, it has a lot of people talking. the less talking you do however, the better.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:52 PM
5

haha troll
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:49 PM
8

they always delete the comments. it got to a point about 6 months ago where every comment I made got deleted and I was put on to pre-moderation twice simply for questioning the rape/domestic violence stats she promotes so much. ironically, it was a t a time when every other article from CIF was a typical male bashing feminist rant about very stupid stuff. point is, a lot of guardian readers are also sick of this stuff judging by the comments sometimes.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:23 PM
1

interesting how the writer dismisses all the data used by MRA but accepts without question everything coming from the feminists!
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:59 PM
2

gender symmetry in some domestic abuse must have done that by mistake. bet he lost his promotion over that slip.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:43 AM
2

thanks for the comprehensive history lesson but with due respect you lost my interest around about the time you said something about the best way to insult an Irish, a Scottish or a Welsh person is to refer to them as 'English. actually, I prefer for purposes of this discussion, to call it england as we are actually talking about england. kind of makes sense. as for your planet, you may return to it now. thanks.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:39 AM
4

as per the rules of r/MensRights I am not making a political point here, but it's similar to Tories bashing UKIP voters. Regardless of the merits or de-merits, when you attack the people, not just the ideology, it's because you are starting to think they have a point. when the big media groups start bashing little tiny MRA groups and use misinformation to do it, you can bet it's because we've hit a nerve there somewhere.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:49 PM
2

oh I totally agree. on days I don't have the chance to read the articles here I feel much better. these are all tiny unrelated events and situations but when you add them all up it is overpowering. the problem is, there is no empathy or sympathy from powers that be, so you feel like it's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:32 PM
2

if the laws were fair, then a sober woman having sex with a drunk erect man would be committing rape, but the laws are not fair. is this a moral or legal question? I think the moral question is simple. in law, it's a different thing.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:44 PM
56

hidden camera or rape of accusation without proof? given an innocent man can't prove a negative, i would prefer the hidden cam charges.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:20 PM
2

the dialogue is so emotionally charged that I think it makes MRA's look bad often enough you think so? speaking passionately about a very emotive issue is making us look bad? it's bad enough that it happens, but when you have governments and NGO's promoting it, sorry but you must get emotive about it.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:16 PM
3

totally agree. i hate all this crap about one being worse, or not, it depends...all crap. it shouldn't be done to either of the sexes.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:15 PM
3

freedom of thought and speech is not the same as right to cut your boy's foreskin off. when you do something that involves mutilating your boy, you go to jail. fuck the religious crap!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:12 PM
3

actually, I think this is the point. a debate over which is worse. what is the point? let's all agree mutilation of boys and girls is wrong, stop doing it for religious or bogus public health reasons and move on. I find the argument about whether one is as bad as the other pointless.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:11 PM
63

it does make you wonder sometimes. is vagina worth it? probably not. that said, why should men be driven away from society in this way. soon, there will be nothing for us, nowhere for us to go to be safe.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:05 AM
6

a high court judge has already ruled that it often is worse and that the only reason why it isn't made illegal is due to religious or ritualistic reasons. get your facts right. after 2000+ years of doing it, if the body wanted it don't you think foreskins would disappear via evolution? read a bit of darwin and cut out the religious crap.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:59 AM
67

i knew it when that woman took over the CPS that she had a political agenda. I think rape was the first thing she spoke about and you could tell where she was going with that.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:22 AM
3

i left a comment about asking men if women should have the snip. it got deleted after 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:15 PM
5

that is disgusting.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:59 PM
1

if i am being attacked by a group of anyone, I assume my life is in danger and kick and punch my way out regardless.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 12:54 PM
4

is this a troll? I don't understand your point and I can't really be bothered playing devil's advocate.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:13 PM
2

kind of reads like passive aggression. anyone here a psychologist? when somebody protests that they are not a hater of men, they usually are. i think a few mind games are being played by the writer. she clearly knows what to say. it's like the article I saw a while back where the writer effectively said if the girl thinks she was raped, she was raped, that simple. one of those things to wind everyone up.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:11 PM
2

wasn't it published back in 2009? why has the international community still still not got round to correcting its approach to this issue? Incidentally, after reading these kinds of things on here does anyone take the time to contact the UN or EU to point out these errors they are making with their policies. Just seems incredible that they continue their gynocentric policies and nothing changes.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:08 PM
6

i thought most states have a mandatory 20 year minimum for raping kids
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:14 PM
1

of course they do that a lot. whenever a so-called mainstream newspaper writes an article about men's rights they always quote one or two racist, sexist or homophobic comments made and then misrepresent them as being typical. the journalists who do that know they are being dishonest but they do it anyway.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:13 PM
1

all humans need rights. there are examples in all societies and all genders of rights abuses. point is, in most situations where there is a campaign to give people rights it's normally a women's political group which is being funded by a public body. very rarely will you see a group advocating men'r rights getting public money. the UN, EU, most governments are spending millions on supporting the feminist ideology. gender pay gap is a perfect example. no gap, just different life choices made over…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:07 PM
1

btw is this in london? looks like the underground.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:01 PM
3

I can't believe they have to be sexist to prove their point that there shouldn't be sexism. to make a gender violence reference is even worse.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:00 PM
6

it is a little odd that so many of these feminists are totally batshit about rape. it's all they talk about. they can't be normal.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 03:27 PM
1

guardian being all gynocentric about suicide? that's a shock
/r/MensRights21/01/15 01:12 PM
3

no, it's not market forces. by admission murdock doesn't make money on his papers. people get it online now for free. he lost 90% of readers on his sun website when it went behind a paywall. if there are market forces at play, they are telling the media mogul you can't make money from newspapers. he knew that already. the uk press is a tiny pimple on the face of news international. murdock only kept the sun as he is sentimental about the paper press. but he is being literally bombarded by the fe…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 12:14 AM
3

feminism is about giving more rights to women in situations where there are normally 2 parties (men and women). robbing peter to pay paul, almost a kind of robin hood. taking from one to give to the other. they are not interested in sharing rights and responsibilities 50/50. they want all the rights and to minimize the responsibility. that article is total BS
/r/MensRights20/01/15 11:59 PM
13

on the pay gap thing, 2 equally educated people at work. one takes a few years off to raise kids, often calls in sick or begs for the occasional afternoon off to pick up micky from hospital and the other doesn't. one works difficult family-unfriendly hours and the other doesn't . one does overtime and the other doesn't. both have the same pay grade, but one gets more money. that's not a gender pay gap. it's a lifestyle choice.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 11:55 PM
3

of course men are raped. these and other such bogus claims need to be challenged. the main point with the issue of male victim is that it isn't reported or regarded as a crime. when it's not legally possible for a woman to rape/envelope a man, no wonder it isn't recorded as a crime when it happens. you must call your teachers out on these things.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 11:52 PM
3

but they're not working on anything. all they do is list the issues and concerns we have and then blame the patriarchy. Just because the patriarchy exists and feminists are against it, doesn't mean patriarchy is to blame. One doesn't necessarily cause the other. You may as well blame the free market or Keynesian theory of economics for our problems. it's not the system, if you can call patriarchy a system. It's the actual issue and lack of priority which is the problem. So basically, according t…
/r/MensRights20/01/15 11:37 PM
3

it's a bit strange as the telegraph is a quality newspaper which unlike the guardian, has a men's section. i would expect this from guardian because of its obvious anti-male agenda but to get this from the telegraph is quite surprising.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:53 PM
1

a boy isn't really really a male in this context. we all know that more or less kids are seen as genderless in this kind of thing. it's a kids charity so you'd expect them to focus on boys as much as girls, but that said, we all know about the women and kids first mentality. they did manage to include a male pedo in there, hardly pro-men's rights. Just perpeptuates the all men are perverts idea.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:12 PM
0

he better be careful or he'll end up like the church of england - woman priests and bishops.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:09 PM
1

that is irrelevant. we know comic relief can give the money to anyone it likes, but the point people are making is a lot of it if not most is funding groups with a political narrative: women's rights. the money goes to female child prostitutes but not male child prostitutes. it goes on helping girls to read, but not boys. we all know a lot of charities in the uk and political, even though that is illegal.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 10:23 AM
23

I will sidestep party political points by confining my comments to saying that anyone who denies financial compensation for someone in jail for a crime he didn't do for 17 years, just to save a little bit of money is truly sick. Doesn't matter what party he is a member of.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 10:17 AM
2

you're right. this happens in every area. take science. maybe most positions are filled by men, but to say that most boys take an interest in science and pursue it as a career because they have privelage is stupid. most boys don't get the chance to pursue a career in science so a campaign to get everyone into whatever the subject is would be far better and supported by most people rather than yet another one which excludes anyone born with a penis.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 04:14 PM
2

i agree. i think it's ok to help women overcome problems they have doing exercise without men necessarily feeling attacked, but you're right. in the uk you can't walk down the road for 2 minutes without seeing an ad for a woman only something or other.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 04:10 PM
1

can't believe they a statute for this to happen.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 09:43 AM
9

I regard this kind of thing as low-level fluff. We have to put-up with these kinds of jokes. As a man working in a office with lots of women I would of course be sacked on the spot if I made a sexist joke but there is of course no problem with women doing the usual 'it's a man's job' kind of thing or making those kinds of jokes. It is annoying but it's small beer to me. couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:04 AM
3

cutting the head off Voldemort’s snake....With his snake dismembered, Voldemort crumbled away to nothing.....quite sickening
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:41 PM
5

as far as I know, a social justice warrior is kind of in-league with the feminists. wouldn't expect much help from them. best bet would be to ask attorney general to comment. he is very quick these days. must be because of the election. everytime the feminists complain a rapist didn't get long enough in jail, he announces he'll look into it. he is already investigating allegations the footballer ched evans has broken the law with his website that he is using to protest his innocence. justice see…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:07 PM
6

there are new laws in the uk which (similar to conspiracy) allow the police to charge and then the CPS prosecute all persons involved for the same crime even if they didn't all do the actual act.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:45 PM
2

oh christ, I've heard that one a few times!!!
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:07 AM
1

totally agree. when the government in the uk recently announced a crackdown on domestic violence the BPS (body that represents chartered psychologists) immediately used it as an opportunity to state to the press that the men should go to jail, an assumption being made that the victims are always women and the perps are always men. Firstly, how can a medical professional be advocating jail for someone who potentially has a mental disorder and in whose care he would be putting himself and secondly…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:06 AM
2

I am all for freedom of the press but this newspaper, a tiny local rag that I am sure nobody reads has been infiltrated by feminists. That's the real story here. The complete lack of empathy by the writer has for any of the issues is staggering. Same thing again again - maybe men have problems but women have it worse. Since when has it become public policy to ignore the problems of one group in society just because another group possibly has it worse? Not that I agree that the analysis is even c…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:43 AM
1

I love the photo in the article. Women campaigning for equal pay for unequal work. Love it.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:34 AM
199

I think it's totally crazy how the very same people who get so upset when a comedian does a rape/violence joke can then turn around and laugh at a guy having his penis cut off.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 12:02 AM
3

just read it on a laptop. you must read them. Mostly people who disagree with the writer. Same goes for the comments on this similarly sexist male-bashing article http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11342408/Are-men-natural-born-criminals-Prison-numbers-dont-lie.html
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:40 PM
1

FYI I am not saying the pope blames men. of course he is referring to all humans, but his language is not gender neautral. do a little research if you can and you will discover a lot of effort in academia is being made to remove gender-specific language from official documentation in public life. at the moment the emphasis is on removing language which undermines the contribution to public life by women, but the cause is for the benefit of men and women. you may not see it as problem, but he not…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:25 PM
1

man is not a gender neutral term. that's the whole point.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:20 PM
1

Can you cite one, just one case in this or the last couple of centuries where jury nullification is known for a fact to have occurred in the prosecution of an individual for possession of CP? Or for that matter, in any state of affairs crimes? btw I tend to use better source materials than Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:49 PM
1

a typical white knight prick. I was arguing with another one on twitter today. he was also a Christian. What's with the God Squad and their belief in men being protectors of women? Didn't the bible say God loves those who help themselves. Doesn't that include women? The one I was arguing with on twitter just wouldn't accept that being a mangina is wrong, that you've been brainwashed if you think men have a moral duty to put their lives before that of women. He also claimed men had it in their DN…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 12:56 AM
2

I made reference to the failure to get the police to act and that doesn't change anything. She had no right in law to take the law into her own hands. She was in possession, for whatever reason and should go to jail. If you disagree or you think you know exactly what was in her mind then you're wrong. She possibly had a duty to tell the police, but what happened after that is not her business. If the police choose not to follow up a lead it is for them to decide. My original point still stands.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:47 PM
4

you can't have jury nullification in english law in this kind of case. the jury can't choose to deliver a verdict of not guilty when the facts suggest the opposite. if the judge discovers this, he can hold the jury in contempt. besides, refusing to find someone guilty is only nullification if the judge has directed the jury to do so and they have refused to follow his directions, for example if they find the idea of convicting someone immoral. in a 'state of affairs' crime it wouldn't really be …
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:43 PM
4

there is nothing in the title to suggest a frame-up, only an attempt to entrap. you perhaps don't understand english and welsh law. i appreciate this is a technical point, but that is MY point. the crime is known as a 'state of affairs' crime. as with drug and other types of possession, your personal circumstances are not taken into account when deciding guilt. if you are in possession, you go to jail for up to 5 years. that his offences were greater that hers and she had a clear motive to doing…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:20 PM
2

speaking as a foreigner who got took the driving test I know how shit scared you are after reading about what happens to you if you crash into a school bus. you're basically toast. so, it's a men's rights issue in the sense that we need to follow it to see if she gets the usual pussy pass. as a man, you'd be dead meat if you were involved in a hit and run with school kids. i remember reading that when the police do a test to see if you are driving under influence, even if the measurement is zero…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:24 PM
4

i went to her twitter page and this story is true. it is very worrying. slowly bit by bit they are trying to change the laws by putting all the responsibility on the guy. he is being asked by law to know what the mental state of girl is. meanwhile, she won't have any responsibility.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:43 PM
9

I checked it out on the Cosmo facebook page. They also have the post: The sex position that is most likely to break his penis: http://cosm.ag/6188xy2Y it's a disgusting rag
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:52 AM
1

Bland and Orn (1986) in a survey conducted in Canada did ask who used violence first. Of the women who reported using violence against their husbands, 73.4% said they used violence first. pg.687 AMAZING!!!
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:47 PM
2

I think the white knights are worse than the feminists. Atleast you know where you stand with the feminists. They are mostly talk. the white knights actually enact laws that physically harm us (conscription, women and kids first etc)
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:16 PM
16

His tweet says it all..... So every #sydneysiege hostage will get a bravery award? Even the men who fled leaving women behind? Don't shame, but don't reward. #teamnile
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:12 PM
4

i can't believe they do that in the name of religion. hey each to his own, horses for courses etc, but that is just sick and so twisted what they do.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:00 PM
2

this is totally counter to the whole women in the army debate, where we know for a fact women can't cope with the training. I don't get what the article writer's point is.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:25 PM
0

simple. don't click. it was clearly identified as the daily mail.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:58 PM
4

you would rather ignore what is going on in the world. Just cause you don't agree with something doesn't mean you should pretend it doesn't exist. the newspaper is the most widely read english language newspaper. wouldn't you rather know what people are writing so you can prepare a counter-attack?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:57 PM
1

the guy almost died from loss of blood.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:22 PM
3

she is amused by the findings? what is wrong with her?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:50 PM
1

actually you are totally right. whilst there is no good Samaritan law in england, so if you don't try to help or rescue someone and they die, you are not liable so long as you didn't cause the situation. there have been cases however where somebody is attacked and then later dies when the ambulance he is being taken to hospital in crashes. the chain of causation was started by the first person who started the violence. in the newspaper story, it was the woman who started the chain.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:28 PM
0

I am suitably impressed by the extent to the belief you have in your powers to read my mind and to determine my motives. What is wrong with you that I can't share this with others on here?
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:27 PM
2

it's the mirror, just a red marxist rag. remember when they published fake photos of uk soldiers supposedly abusing insurgents? that's why pierce morgan lost his job as editor. the man should have been jailed for life for treason.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:44 PM
21

but that report says that nearly 1 in 5 women has been raped. That can't be right.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:51 PM
7

I am a man and if I wish to regard anything, be it the cost of bananas or my right to liberty, as a mens rights issue, I will.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:24 PM
2

what does that mean, if men can't change?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:54 PM
2

be it the section on IPV or victims of suicide, they always show a photo of a woman
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:39 PM
1

quite an interesting debate going on in the comments section.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:45 PM
-1

wrong. you're an idiot. research shows it's almost 50/50.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:20 PM
3

report it here http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/about-us/news-centre/press-contact-information
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:01 PM
49

I would complain. This is serious shit. I have looked at the website. I can't believe they have charitable status. They are clearly a political group. That is illegal under charity laws.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:57 PM
2

Nita Dowell, Senior Crown Prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service in Wales said ‘Ched Evans took advantage of a vulnerable young woman who was in no fit state to consent to sexual activity. He did so knowingly and a total disregard for her physical or emotional wellbeing'. talk about white knight syndrome
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:25 AM
3

it is crazy that we have a system where a man and woman can be both drunk but only he is liable for rape as the narrow definition of rape excludes women from having capacity to commit it.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:21 AM
3

surely the BEST approach is for someone to flag these things and then for the community here to check stuff out, which is exactly what happened in this case, little like a journalist submitting his basic ideas to his legal fact checkers before following up on a story. don't discourage people to take time out of their free time to contribute.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:20 AM
-6

actually, there are many small countries with access to the nuclear bomb. but warfare has changed so there will probably not be a WWIII. That said, Germany is starting to flex her muscles again. Don't be surprised if they start empire building again. We must keep the draft but must include women this time.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:21 PM
2

where was this? america? holy crap, a woman can kill her husband and be out after 2 years
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:17 PM
0

what you seem to be saying that during sex, atleast on college campus, every single sexual act is rape unless you specifically ask permission. I think you are bang on the money. That is exactly what has happened given that the definition of rape is now pretty much anything the victim wants it to be. Luckily for me, this only applies (for the moment) on campus. plus I live in the UK, so unless Labour get in after the election we are safe.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:47 PM
1

i would do the same if the bitch attacked me
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:33 PM
64

maybe the government could do more to help in this situation. They did recently announce tough new penalties for Mothers who block the husbands from seeing the kids, but only time will tell if it's enough.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:38 PM
1

Whilst I do believe that it is the money and free houses that the government gives to single women that is the biggest cause of kids without Fathers, I am happy to see this new programme. It is easy to assume that rather than offering men support, it will be used as another way to attack the so-called feckless Father, in the same way Geraldo on Fox News in the USA is telling men to be a good Father and ignoring the fact that the concept of equal parenting has been dismissed by most liberals. The…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:36 PM
2

they got it wrong to the extent that abbey rd is in london, not liverpool. i guess they recreated it for fun. I am sure these educated women knew that they were not actually anywhere near abbey rd. The street they use in the photo is just round the corner from the school of tropical medicine where they discovered flies carry malaria. maybe they should have dressed like flies.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:33 PM
1

must admit I just scanned it, didn't read all of it as it sounded a bit gynocentric to me. one of those pricks arguing that basically all men carry the blame for the rape of a few. sorry, not buying.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:50 PM
1

no, you're wrong. it is a deliberate policy that captains of ships must rescue the women first. we are talking pseudo-navy here. they have a right to shoot you as they did on the titanic.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:29 PM
1

if you choose not to they will shoot you dead. you know that?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:26 PM
9

yes, and even assuming that a girl who makes a false allegation out of malice or whatever actually gets time, she will no doubt spend less time in jail than the poor guy who was falsely accused. i am not saying that you should get 20 years for making a false allegation but clearly the system is corrupted by the feminists when the false accuser gets less time than the one she made the allegation against.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:13 AM
1

this article is full of bs. these people seriously think the only way to end sexism for women is to promote sexism among men. how twisted is that?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 06:15 PM
1

feminism is about fighting inequality :) got to laugh
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:35 PM
0

I always thought the Transformers were male, except the pink ones with female voices. What was I just reading?
/r/MensRights26/12/14 10:19 AM
1

what does this mean?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:39 PM
-1

I more or less agree. With the exception of less than 1% of pregnancies which are the result of rape, I think abortion is wrong. Again, it's part of the narrative which says women are not responsible for anything. A man and woman are both drunk. they have sex but he is guilty of rape if she has regrets the next day. even if she does't claim regret-rape, she can kill the baby if she gets pregnant because she was drunk. never, at any point is she held liable. it's always the man.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:37 PM
7

Let's get this straight. Women-only scholarships are normal yet despite the fact that there is a minority of male teachers it would be unlawful to offer male-only scholarships. Like most countries in the Western world, this country is totally f**cked up.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:53 AM
10

how can you be the ...perpetrator of domestic violence, even if they had not been arrested, charged or found guilty???? don't understand that one bit. the point is that women can now have removed from the house and have their property taken away on the say-so of the wife. worrying stuff.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 02:43 PM
3

Love this line.....mens groups are vital to create men that make good husbands and fathers. Clearly they have no idea what men are joining these groups for.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 08:11 AM
6

5 words? I love reading Huffington Post
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:16 AM
1

true. the way in which women are trying to jump-over the usual hurdles to get what they call social justice can easily be done by men too. we are much further behind but with the internet we can do so much more. The further behind you are, the more progress you can make. The feminists have pretty much run-out of steam.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:11 AM
0

but guys are f**ked either way. a man and woman both have same qualifications but she has been taking time out on and off for years to have babies and still expects to get all the promotions and same money as the guy? the special status women now enjoy is nuts but it is part of life. My advice is men focus on the higher level jobs.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:08 AM
1

that's also kind of my point. as the Irish newspaper pointed out yesterday, in Ireland there are none. but surely a family carol concert could find a gender neutral charity?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:03 AM
1

I assume (1) the man must be found guilty in a court of law and not just on the word of the wife (2) it won't really matter because the courts afford men/fathers no rights anyway, so why would they if he has a cloud hanging over him?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:01 AM
1

the carol concert I went to this year was good until half-way through they asked for donations for the local battered womens' centre. i wouldn't have minded had they been collecting for battered men too.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:23 PM
16

just watched it. I have no words for what I saw. I can't believe the reaction is bring on a feminist and to blame men!
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:13 PM
1

you're saying feminism is good but the people adopting it are doing it incorrectly? a bit like saying communism is good but every major power from Russia to North Korea just never quite got the hang of it? I tend to doubt the motives of most of the feminists we read about. They are evil. Pure and simple.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:26 PM
1

but buzzfeed is very feminist, which kind of undermines the original article. It's a bit like a republican using a reference from a FOX executive to get a job. A little too subjective to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:24 PM
4

but if we all just stopped reading the liberal feminist online newspapers, would it really exist in normal society? I have to say most girls I know are just normal, regular girls who love shopping, rom-coms and doing normal stuff. OK, occasionally a friend of mine will use the #feminist on a photo she publishes, but normally, I don't find many girls are doing this psycho feminist crap. Which leads me to think that except for the real danger that exists from politicians who take the radical femin…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:22 PM
0

wow. That article is total crap. Is that a real newspaper? It's really pathetic.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:17 PM
-1

it's true. who cares if girls are more likely to pass the feminized high school exams and they are more likely to go to uni and be accepted on soft courses. it means nothing. it actually weeds out the girls who are not academically gifted and makes it easier for the truly gifted boys and girls to do real subjects at uni.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:14 PM
1

isn't there a video?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:07 PM
1

social conservatives see men as a problem just as much. FOX news is laying the blame of the race-riots in USA not on bad cops but on bad fathers. Left or right, men get the blame for everything. Nobody mentions that a law protecting the right of father to see their kids might change things.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:22 AM
3

Pornography is a marriage killer....meaning, that women have lost marriage/sex as a weapon with which to control men. For that reason, feminists are not happy and this is why we are seeing such an attack on legal porn in this country. What was once defended by liberals is now condemned and we get all kinds of false data claiming porn is bad for young boys, it causes them to beat-up their girlfriends and other such crap. Ban page 3, limit access to legal porn and pretty much anything to halt the …
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:20 AM
14

funny how most men who find they are accused of killing are treated like scum and they face a full criminal investigation but if you're a woman and you kill a man, you only have to say he abused you and you'll have the cops falling over themselves to give you a hug and support you.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:14 AM
1

Football clubs in the UK have already started banning fans caught using phrases like "man up" and you play "like a girl"
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:10 PM
3

given that there is now a large body of evidence that women are and have always been raping men maybe the message needs to be applied to both sexes not to rape the other. For a start, there must be a change in the law to tell people just because he had an erection, doesn't mean he consented. there is no reason why the message that boys are getting from feminists can't be applied to girls too.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:26 PM
0

ok let's talk about it. How is it a non-issue? You don't see a trend in the media towards this behavior type?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:23 AM
2

It is the most popular newspaper in the English speaking world. There isn't a single newspaper in America which has more readers than the Mail. I don't read it to improve my own personal knowledge of current events but to monitor what lies and being fed to the rest of the world on issues which are of interest to me. For the same reason I read The Guardian, to see what the other side is chattering about.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:05 PM
1

they seem to saying they will not oppose a mens rights centre as long as we use it to continue the fight for women?
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:53 AM
2

sounds like you're against MRA and in favour of feminism.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:48 PM
1

sorry, but I feel that you want men to change, not because we want to, but because it's what the feminists want. I have no problem with sensitive men but I am damned if I will become extra sensitive just to score points. the whole feminist agenda is to try to change men into something we are not. to effectively feminize us. i am not saying that men must be macho all the time, but I doubt we will do ourselves any favours by buying into the narrative that men are nasty assholes and we need to lear…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:41 PM
2

you can't trust the psychology community. I follow the British Psychological Society news and virtually every story is gynocentric.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:37 PM
3

Shelters for battered men would be the norm if feminism didn't control the narrative on DV. you've got it spot on! they control the narrative with virtually every issue.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:35 PM
2

defensive and reactionary only because with feminists you never know where they will strike next. they make it up as they go so we have to respond. like the prime minister, you can't control events, only manage and respond.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:34 PM
2

anti-gynocentrism is to be against everything and every policy being written based on the female view of the world and pro-men's rights is to be in favour of getting equality for men in areas of law and government policy where they have no rights or are specifically being discriminated against. I guess you can have the two. nobody is confusing them.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:32 PM
1

list some jobs where women are getting less money for doing exactly the same job with the exact same knowledge, skills and experience/time served. women who have taken a few years off to raise children don't count because by definition they have less experience/time served. Please don't mention FTSE100 company boardrooms. I am talking about normal, real people.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:27 PM
2

LBGTQ+ what's this?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:24 PM
1

It is a scandal Harman used her questions to ask about purely feminist issues. To make matters worse her data was well off. I look forward to seeing more debates in Parliament about gender issues. Just my view, but Clegg wiped the floor with Harman! Not a big of his, but he did have his facts ready!
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:52 PM
1

I complained on the official Panorama twitter page and gave them some stats from a recent study. They blocked me.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:25 AM
-6

what what I have read about the man, he is beyond educating. he made his position about everything a long time ago.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 11:36 AM
2

"Our trust in her was misplaced." The updated note removes that line, which struck some critics as blaming the victim. Some advocates for rape victims have expressed concern that the magazine's backpedaling could lead to a setback in efforts to combat sexual assaults both at U.Va. and college campuses elsewhere. blaming the victim? what victim?
/r/MensRights08/12/14 09:10 AM
3

read the comments. except for a few, most think she was right. with people like that on a jury if you were innocent you wouldn't stand a chance.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:10 PM
9

now the home secretary in the uk needs to go away and re-write her anti-domestic violence laws. she is under the assumption men can't be victims.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 03:27 PM
3

the moment the UK started having elected commissioners we were all doomed to having this kind of political crap.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:39 PM
1

by the way, what does your professor say about it? could be an opportunity for pioneering research should you decide to do a PHD later on.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:29 PM
1

The problem with rape stats is that the Home Office under Harriet Harmon included non-penetration acts when counting the number of rapes, such as emotional pressure a man puts on a wife to have sex. So it seems that in attempting to prove that a rape culture exists, the government does include non-penetration but only when the rape is against a woman.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:28 PM
0

if a guy is hopping in and out of bed with men he must record what he does. seems either way he will be in trouble but a guy must have a right to protect himself. jumping into bed with any woman these days is a high risk activity. forget about aids, it's the false allegations you must think about.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:29 PM
5

Ask her directly if she thinks there is something wrong with Egalitarianism. If she says yes, there is something wrong with her.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:09 PM
3

it is not being suggested that all allegations are true. The journalist is saying all rapes are real. Big difference. lots of people here who do not believe in due process. He has every right to go to the police and for his allegation to be treated like any report of rape. All those here who say it is his fault because he didn't stop the crime from continuing are incredibly stupid. A victim of any crime is not bound by law to stop the crime from continuing. Funny how so many people seem to be ab…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:12 PM
3

what happened to affirmative consent?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 09:04 AM
1

the problem with him is that he basically sums up the view of most people in the media. even attempting to get the parliament in any developed country to consider changing the definition on rape is going to be an uphill struggle.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 08:44 AM
1

when collecting data on rapes suffered by women, it is totally normal to include when a woman is pressured into sex by a man or talked into it after initially saying no. These kinds of things are not normally included when data is taken about men having been raped by women as under the definition of rape in most countries, a woman can't physically rape a man. So basically, the answer is yes. Most people who rape are men because there is a gender bias in the initial definition. Change the definit…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:28 PM
1

please elaborate. Eating ovaries is funny?
/r/MensRights27/11/14 11:15 PM
1

May is as big a feminist as you could get, once you discount the last director of public proesecutions.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 02:24 PM
20

"There's nothing that a victim can do to avoid being raped or assaulted. It's the responsibility of the perpetrator, and those perpetrators are men." as long as the feminists are able to use this serious issue as part of their political propaganda there is no hope that the issue of rape by women against men will ever be taken seriously. That of course, would involve re-defining the legal definition of rape to include women-on-men rape. That will never happen because the whole issue is so politic…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 02:21 PM
2

are the police targeting black women too? no? then it is a men's rights issue. why can't it be? who says? issues which affect men don't have to be officially accepted by the powers that be in order for a protest to be legitimate. do what the feminists do and complain about everything which affects you. what's the problem? it doesn't have to be disregarded by women before we can talk about it.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 12:00 PM
1

is it fake? looks quite sick.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 09:35 AM
0

i guess the point is they use and abuse the stats for their own political ends like most politically motivated people.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 11:38 AM
1

Nothing worse than a feminist social-scientist. Psychology gets enough criticism but when the so-called scientists use political views in their conclusions it is not good.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:37 AM
4

According the article in Daily Mail, Seema Malhotra, Labour's new shadow anti domestic violence minister said figures showed there were 12 million women and 2.5 million men that had been the victims of domestic abuse. I thought 40% of victims were men? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2846299/Bullying-husbands-shout-wives-guilty-domestic-abuse-new-crackdown.html
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:18 PM
3

In the UK the retirement ages will be equalized but it is being phased in slowly to give women a decade to prepare for the news that must retire at the same age as men. Fair enough. I think the idea that men have always had to work longer and/or are forced by law to share their pensions with their partner are men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:21 PM
1

it would have to the be the first time
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:24 PM
2

Funny how in the UK for example, we don't hear more from the professionals who spend all their working lives helping men with their emotions. I am talking about psychologists. Whenever there is an issue relating to any of the issues men suffer from, you almost never hear the BPS (British Psychological Society) talking about it. The last time there was research published on the effect of domestic violence on women, the BPS was there with a ready-made press release calling for all men who commit v…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:19 PM
2

check out the other articles on their website. Lots of sexist stuff and male-bashing.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 11:21 PM
7

In the UK taxes are collected from everyone but most of the health service budget is spent on women-only services. The feminists never talk about that.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:09 PM
3

And I thought we had it bad with the BBC. Wow!!! They are talking about this so-called price gap like it is a documented fact. I think the feminists need to learn a little of basic economics and supply and demand.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:07 PM
3

Christ! Everyday if it's not one thing they complain about it's something else. The man-haters are so aggressive now!
/r/MensRights21/11/14 01:09 PM
1

you wouldn't think so if you read the news on the bbc, guardian or independent. don't think the liberals quite get this due process thing.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:20 PM
5

Rape culture doesn't exist. The idea that men are all walking around saying I think I might rape today, or maybe tomorrow after football would be laughable if it were not for the serious nature of the issue. Ending violence against innocent people is a noble thing and the cornerstone of the human rights movement. Campaigning to end violence only against women is political and doomed to fail. Face the facts. We are constantly being told to use gender neutral language. So why use gender-biased lan…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:18 PM
0

unless she was raped, she started the chain of events, so that is wrong. Nobody forces a woman to have a virginal conception. Once you do the nasty, you have lost the right to claim the consent thing. The time will come when women will be held responsible for their actions. Any man who is pro-abortion and follows the argument you've given will be pissing in the wind if he expects MRA to accomplish anything in the next 50 years.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 01:22 PM
1

I was in USA for a short time once. I shit when I saw a leaflet saying if I was over whatever age and was a man I would have to sign up just in-case there is a war and the government wishes to draft me. Couldn't live in such a country with that hanging over me simply because I had a penis.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 01:19 PM
3

sorry, I read the page on the FBI website. I didn't see anything that suggested to me in clear English that a man who wakes up to find a woman bouncing on his erect penis is a victim of rape.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 11:38 PM
0

gender pat gap doesn't exist. why argue over false stats? in the uk, they say there is a pay gap when men build cars and women make the covers of the seats. two totally different jobs, but feminazis say it is a gender pay gap. total crap.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 02:50 PM
8

feminists complain that they have been barred from making contributions to the world of science for generations and are normally portrayed as fashionista bimbo-types by the media. when they have a chance to focus on the science, all they can talk about is the fashion.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:33 PM
1

i know how you feel. I had to stop reading the Guardian newspaper for the exactly same reason. Turns out they probably have the best media coverage but spend way too much time hair-splitting about every single issue that the feminists complain about. Same with the BBC radio Media Show. let's face it, not too many shows on the BBC about the media, as opposed to just celebrity stuff. Sadly now, every episode has features like... what can we do to get more women to take an interest in sci-fi or wha…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:55 AM
3

by the way, if you are in any way against abortion this probably isn't the best place to air your views either. It is a very specific topic, like being a eurosceptic. You're best looking for other pro-lifers and follow what they are doing.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:01 AM
2

regardless of whether you are for against abortion, and believe me many here are for it, you can't debate it with the feminists. They are 100% for and that is the end of the discussion. I often get my posts deleted on The Guardian whenever I bring-up the dodgy rape stats. They don't like it, so they stop you from speaking.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:58 AM
1

To my knowledge he has no connection to mens rights. Why would we have any opinion on him. I know of a few good legal/freedom of expression subreddits which probably talk about him all the time but why would we have any view either way? i for one don't need to explain or justify my views to you. That said, I believe feminists like to ban things or people that disagree with their political mantra, so I understand why you don't like him. Your question is both provocative and misguided.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:54 AM
1

if you wer familiar with the website you'd know it is designed to provoke the exact reaction you are getting on here.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:23 PM
2

self defense is sufficient for me
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:22 PM
2

given that kicking a man in the balls is illegal, then this post is promoting illegal actions. who would you report this to?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:22 PM
1

she posted the trolling comments herself? poor girl. will is such a moron for using her in his political rant.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:48 AM
1

there were reports she was trolling herself for the attention. i feel so bad for her. she needed help. what the ex-start trek actor is doing is exploiting the suffering of a poor girl for his own political reasons and he got the facts of the case wrong. he once said he was glad there wasn't live blogging when he was in start trek because he would have got a lot of abuse on account of his really bad acting. he has quite a few chips on his shoulder.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:46 AM
4

have you told the local newspaper or local bbc radio station?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:57 PM
0

Men should be given equal rights regarding the future of the baby. It's really quite simple. I am guessing you will find this issue separates the men who supports men's rights from those who really don't. The fact that people always say the baby is inside the woman, therefore she must have all the rights, proves my point that people use this an a woman's rights issue. Personally, I think we must consider the rights of the baby, the only innocent party here. Regardless of the cause of conception,…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:48 AM
2

haha that's probably why so many people wear sunglasses at the beach even when it's not that sunny!
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:20 PM
2

I think many of the items on the list are difficult to disagree with, but nobody has the right to tell me who or what I look at or for how long. If they wish to walk away, they can. For them to know I am looking at them, they would have to be looking at me too. Maybe that would make me feel uncomfortable too. My motives for looking are just an unknown as theirs. If a girl shows her cleavage and I look, doesn't mean I have any sexual thoughts or desires. Just means I'm wondering WFT is she doing …
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:16 PM
-1

don't worry, it won't be the last. By all accounts the next lead in Doctor Who will be a woman too. Turning a man (ok, I know he's an alien) into a woman is quite a scoop for the feminists.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:46 PM
1

I am a man, never seen it, never will, but I guess MTV is desperate for ratings. They did well with Catfish, but hits for MTV are few and very far between! I am supposing the network gave up attempting to attracting male viewers when they ditched music from their flagship channel.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:44 PM
1

haha OMG!
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:36 PM
1

Most common laws have been removed in US law to be replaced by politically driven judges, so I totally disagree with you. The English legal system is under attack by feminism. Of that there is no doubt, but the American system has many flaws. Although you created the seperation of powers, it is obvious to the lay person that your laws are shaped much more directly by the mood of the public. With the exception of the interference from Euro judges, common law is alive and well in England and Wales…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 01:01 PM
1

that was a typo. I corrected it.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 12:19 AM
1

The prosecution (CPS) is free to prosecute anyone it wishes without fear or favour. The typical liberal media outrage suggests that there is a belief the CPS shouldn't go after women who make false accusations because the poor little darlings are frail and must be protected. Classic White-Knight Syndrome. The CPS clearly thought her testimony was dodgy and riddled with inconsistencies and it also clearly thought that a prosecution against her for making a false accusation in the first place was …
/r/MensRights08/11/14 12:13 AM
3

These people are totally nuts. The best quote by way of example I think was from Laura Dunn, executive director of SurvJustice, on why some colleges have pushed back against lowering the standard of proof for sexual assault cases to make it easier to hold young men accused of sexual assault: "To put it bluntly, I think it's arrogance and ingrained male privilege . . . ."
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:07 AM
2

According to your University sexual violence includes making references to personal appearance? If you make fun of the way a girl looks you are committing sexual violence against her? No wonder nobody believes the stats on sexual violence anymore!
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:46 PM
1

they are calling catcalling a human rights issue. wtf has happened to the world? next the united nations will be spending billions on it!
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:07 AM
0

haven't watched it yet, but the bbc has more manginas and victims of white knight syndrome than a feminist AGM!
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:57 PM
1

RE maltreatment of children, according to the report... More than 40 percent (44.4%) were men and more than one-half (53.8%) were women. why on earth do people in the media always claim most maltreatment is caused by men?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:10 AM
2

95% of the victims of domestic violence are women???? these stats are way-off
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter