TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ullere Archive

View 3 posts and 476 comments by ullere on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Please give yourself more credit. There are hundreds of thousands of people who watch motivation videos on a daily basis and don't get shit done. You made it happen. It's you!
/r/MensRights22/07/23 07:40 PM
1

Wage gap myth CONSAD study 'The report demonstrates that it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence can confidently be attributed to overt discrimination against women.' Forbes article on the wage gap myth 'Academics can debate why men and women make these different choices. The important take…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 11:32 PM
1

'oh be quiet' - a perfect first comment there.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:41 PM
2

Feminism is the new funny? Well fuck that.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:53 PM
1

That's awesome, that makes me think you should publish your essay in a peer reviewed journal.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:33 AM
3

What grade did the paper get?
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:59 PM
1

Awesome source, adding my copy pastas to it now.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:55 PM
3

I got my reply from ASA today saying that they have found nothing wrong with the Christmas advert. They say that because asda asked mothers whether or not they found the advert representative of their experience that it's ok. Seriously...
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:23 PM
1

God have mercy on the unlucky creature who stands accused in this court. Courts where justice is believed to segregated according to gender, Male judges are often not "sensitive towards crimes against women and are biased towards the male gender when hearing a woman's plea" where the aim is the swiftness of judgements rather than the accuracy of them The courts will ensure the "speedy disposal of cases" Where the rulings and trials are secret "secrecy during the trials" will be a priority A horr…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:31 PM
1

probably never happened. If you are easily disgusted I would stay away from 4chan.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:06 PM
2

I have copied this post to the article, but it hasn't gotten through moderation yet. I'll hold my breath :) feel free to submit this or a version of the comment.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:31 PM
1

I hate this kind of thinking. Rather than addressing the issue of violence, and the causes of violence, they scape goat an entire gender. Violence isn't the problem, it's those men, keep them away from women and women will be safe. This way they need only reduce service to men, rather than increasing service to all. More police, better courts, better lighting, security at cab stands, cameras inside cabs, cameras at cab stand, and a whole host of other measures would reduce the threat against eve…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:47 PM
3

The comment section is really good. It's always a surprise to see such strength and red pill thought from the public. Perhaps a sign of the mrm gaining more traction.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:33 PM
1

I really liked this article, seemed very upbeat :)
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:06 PM
17

Oh god. Last week, the men’s rights activist blog Return of Kings posted a list of the nine ugliest feminists. ROK is Game guy Roosh's pet site, were all kinds of pua's post daily short posts. It is in no way a MRA site, like not even a litte. Return Of Kings is a blog for heterosexual, masculine men. It’s meant for a small but vocal collection of men in America today who believe men should be masculine and women should be feminine. RoK aims to usher the return of the masculine man in a world wh…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:00 PM
11

female vs male genital muitliation, taking the assumption that FGM is 10 times worse(which is isn't always, depends on the type of genial cutting, but whatever) Analogy cutting of fingers is wrong. MRM cutting off finger of infants is wrong, if it is illegal to cut off 10 fingers from a girl it should be illegal to cut off 1 finger from a boy also. Fem- Cutting of ten fingers is way worse, it's not the same. End credits. Being against both things doesn't mean you are saying they are equivocal. N…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 01:42 PM
2

I think it would likely be better to charge for the service rather than the gender of the person recieving the service. I don't like this step to make all services charged the same but I suppose hair dressers can get around it by offering a more specified range of cuts. Like 'designer styling - 20 dkk, short back and sides - 10 dkk, trim with scissors 5 dkk', or something along those lines. The idea that every female hair cut takes longer than a guys simply isn't true. Or they could do a timed v…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:24 AM
1

Strawman fallacy. I at no time have said anything in regards to what you are experiencing, even people who have experience horrific things or taking terrible risks can come out unscathed. You simply do not make political, social, moral, or medical decisions based on individual experience. Not at a societal level, for policies such as the genital cutting of infants you need to think across all of society. Even if you think it's morally and medically sound(which obviously I don't), the evidence I'…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:04 AM
2

So doctor who spends his lifetime studying the causes and the effects of cancer shouldn't comment on a proposed treatment for cancer unless he's actually had cancer? Nonsense and gibberish. I have no need to persuade you, my comments are for the rational third person who reads this. He will see me making a reasoned debate and you building a flawed analogy about strawmen atheists. Also it's atheists*. Now I'm off to eat shit etc :) Pointing out logical fallcies is not ad hominem, it is entirely a…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:50 PM
1

'Guest strip by Crazy Chucky and Casey Mitchem! I honestly think it’s Jamie and Hazel’s brief discussion of walking through Lego bricks that made this strip a shoo-in. Today’s guest spot is by Crazy Chucky and Casey Mitchem and their comic is called More Power! *Apparently the MRA (yes, the Men’s Rights Activists is a real thing and not a fairy tale) has been lovingly loving up the comments section in a way that I find rather distasteful. In respect for the hard-working and wonderful guest artis…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:52 PM
1

Just me that finds this stuff stupid and not mens rights related?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:44 PM
6

I have to disagree with your view of throwing babies off bridges as being 'dangerous and unneccessary'. I was thrown off a bridge shortly after birth and landed on a passing truck carrying pillows and have none of the negative side effect people are using to argue against it. Infact I see it as being more exciting, and I find that women are more attracted to babies who have been thrown off a bridge. -Reductio ad absurdum Fallacies - I was circumcised shortly after birth. I have had none of the n…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:39 PM
23

Here's a news article about the study I believe he's refering too 'Ground-breaking research shows that boys lower their sights if they think their work is going to be marked by a woman because they believe their results will be worse. It also shows their suspicions are correct – female teachers did, on average, award lower marks to boys than unidentified external examiners.' Here is the summary of the research And here is the full paper
/r/MensRights18/01/13 10:20 PM
2

It's not the only study that shows a link, I prefer to just link one source per point made. here is another case study from the female side 'Conclusion: There was a decrease in couple’s sexual life after circumcision indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men or/and their partners, possibly because of complications of surgery and loss of nerve endings. The results support the view that physicians and parents should be informed of the potential benefits and r…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:10 AM
5

Also the one year thing is greatly exaggerated '195 circumcisions would be needed to prevent one hospital admission for UTI in the first year of life.'
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:07 PM
9

In addressing the penile cancer, HPV, and HIV benefits : firstly correlation is not causation. If it turns out that the reason for the lower rates of std's in circumcised men is in fact that circumcision lowers male sexual pleasureby removing the most sensitive glands on the penis then essentially you are condoning the reduction and abuse of male sexual function in exchange for a reduction is std rates. I would also imagine that castration greatly reduces the rates of males catching std's and pe…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:04 PM
4

Annecdotal evidence from individuals who claim to have a better sex life due to being circumcised doesn't actually count, or more accurately, annecdotal evidence proves nothing. There are plenty of examples of women who claim to have better sex after themselves being circumcised, but this doesn't prove that circumcision of females improves sexual function. Even if you could, scientifically and empirically, prove that an adult circumcision has sexual benefits. You are in no way addressing the iss…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:53 PM
5

My heart goes out to you man, I am sorry for how you have been wronged.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:41 PM
14

Good thing, since the link requires membership.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:35 PM
2

It really depends on what the goal of the sport is. If it is to find the absolute best at the activity then yes, it should be a free for all. If it is to make money (like our current system) then sports should be based on revenue, with tax taken from profits and put into grass root level support for the sport. If it is give everyone the experience of competition, team work, physical activity, and the other huge array of benefits participation in a sport provides then we should provide subsidised…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:58 AM
1

This is a very well written article, possibly the best coverage I've seen of the issue of violence targetting males that I have ever read.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:15 AM
1

Imagine that there is a correlation between circumcision and lower rates of sexually transmitted disease (even though studies show that the opposite is true for women, men are more protected, women less so. Along with all the huge issues with the methodology in the studies, and the fact that rates of circumcision do not correlate with levels of stds internationally, more studies on lack of correlation.) Firstly correlation is not causation. If it turns out that the reason for the lower rates of …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:53 AM
1

Only £17 million from the UK, still £40 of that came from me.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:51 AM
3

Won't this link stop working when the /b thread ends up at page 15? Thats not the archive site or? Anyway, why is everyone linked to /b all of a sudden. First rules 1 and 2. Secondly nothing to do with /mr.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:16 PM
13

Well good thing it was posted to a satire humor sub... I take MR pretty seriously, the quality of posts here affects the movement as a whole.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:55 PM
33

Also we have nothing to do with /b, not a mensrights issue.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:07 PM
2

Dude that is actually s pretty decent graphic. Nice work, it's simplicity is it's strength.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:52 PM
4

Citation showing women experiencing more crime than men needed...
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:03 AM
9

Quite alot of comments saying it isn't funny, seems like reddit got that one just about right. It's not just pride. In our culture, even the suggestion that a man has committed certain offenses (battery, rape, etc.) can destroy his life in a heartbeat. The mere implication can be enough to convict in the minds of onlookers. It doesn't matter if it's actually true or not. I concur with the notion that this is not a funny prank.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:02 AM
4

Yeah I'm with you, funny advert, no double standards.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:52 AM
3

Are you Scottish? Nice work, keep us updated if they respond.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:30 PM
2

I mentioned that possibility 'Even if you assume a higher rate of under reporting on behalf of men, and ignoring female perpetrators, it still doesn't account for such a disparity in victim rates.' While I accept there is alot of shame in being a male victim, I don't believe that would account for a three fold higher reporting on behalf of women. However as you say, pure speculation, and since I cannot say exactly how under reported either gender is I can only take the numbers at face value.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:15 PM
0

Y-chromosome... check. Man.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:29 PM
9

While every victim is of equal value, saying that the raw number of victims is half male still points to a much higher rate of victimisation of women in the military do to the lover overall % of women in the military. In the US, according to Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, women make up 14.6% of the military as a whole, so if exactly half the victims are female that would mean women are some 3.5 times as likely to be victimised as men sexually. Assuming they are equally li…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:24 PM
1

Every invitation to fight is an invitation to die, or to go to jail after killing. I let idiots wash over me. They are nothing.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:29 AM
2

From me: Mens issues • Poor male outcomes in health • Poor male outcomes in education • Discrimination in the work Place • Domestic violence against men • Discrimination in law • Uneven distribution of work place deaths • Bias against men in family courts • Parental alienation • False accusations • Negative portrayal of men in the media • Negative stereotypes of men in contemporary culture • The prevalence of male genital mutilation • The "gender empathy gap" From IMD. An survey of professionals…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:07 AM
1

I'd say these stats are suspect. Even ignoring the lack of sources and the unknowable amount of unreported rape(they claim to know that just over half of all rapes are never reported). Even from this one infor graphic, '5 are convicted on felony charges, 3 rapists spent a single day in prison', what in the hell kind of felony charge are they being convicted on that isn't leading to prison? Next is the idea that only 9 out of 46 reports leads to prosecution, which has been disproven a bunch of ti…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:56 AM
1

It's actually taken from part of an essay I was writing a while back, I tend to post it whenever the wage gap issue comes up from a newbie to /MR. Still no worries.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:43 AM
12

He was charged, then showed the police the tape, and charges were dropped. Is my understanding. No charges brought against his ex though.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:16 PM
2

Man the Indian MRM does it right, really awesome IMD celebration. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:13 PM
35

Wage gap myth consad study 'The report demonstrates that it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence can confidently be attributed to overt discrimination against women.' forbes article on the wage gap myth 'Academics can debate why men and women make these different choices. The important take…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:01 PM
6

I suppose Forbes could educate Forbes... 'Academics can debate why men and women make these different choices. The important takeaway, however, is that there are many reasons that men and women on average earn different amounts. It’s a mistake to assume that “wage gap” statistics reflect on-the-job discrimination.'
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:57 PM
4

Yeah thats what suprised me, the wording in the URL is terrible.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:57 AM
3

No, she pretended to commit suicide in order to stop the outrage coming from various MRM sites. It was featured in AVFM, along with a piece about her from JTO. JTO's email exchange post about her alleged suicide And the post about her non-suicide. I can't find the one from AVFM so heres matt forney instead. Femitheist's new site
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:56 AM
7

Groped by adult woman no?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:15 AM
3

Happy IMD everyone. Here is a video made by a masculinist friend on mine about the day.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:09 PM
2

Wow the comment sections in those articles are infuriating, just more shaming nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:00 PM
2

Yes, this is why: lets imagine that there is a correlation between circumcision and lower rates of sexually transmitted disease (even though studies show that the opposite is true for women, men are more protected, women less so. Along with all the huge issues with the methodology in the studies, and the fact that rates of circumcision do not correlate with levels of stds internationally, more studies on lack of correlation.) Firstly correlation is not causation. If it turns out that the reason …
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:45 AM
6

Full list. continuing from point 4) 5) education: “women do better on some educational indicators, like test scores or enrolment” The main threats to education for men and women is corporatization, which increasingly imposes a rigid reliance on test scores (like was tried in Chicago), while undermining accessibility through tuition hikes (like was tried in Quebec). These threats to education harm both men and women, and a united fightback is necessary. Chicago teachers fought to defend education…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:30 AM
69

Came here to say this, this title has exaggerated and made this a gender issue when it isn't really one. They have allowed the boy to organise a dress down day where all children contribute to movember charities while wearing a fake moustache.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:57 PM
1

The moustache is for solidarity and awareness, you can also get sponsorship money if you're into that sort of thing. I prefer to simply contribute through a courier scheme that doubles my contribution to prostate cancer research. I have seen a bunch of youtuber saying they'll contribute to AVFM during November, so each to their own.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:41 AM
1

Got alot of respect for your bravery dude. I wore black nail polish and some eye make up for a goth theme party and got plenty of abuse for it from the dudes who never bothered dressing up. Gotta be strong enough to do your own thing, power to you man.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:22 PM
1

I'd say no, I don't believe annecdotes add anything to the MRM.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:32 PM
4

Really interesting video. I can only hope some Red pill guys go to this 'man-up week' and coopt the event with reality.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:49 PM
3

ASDA ADVERTISING COMPLAINTS - As of this morning the ASA had had 33 complaints, up on the 24 from yesterday. Please keep sending in your complaints to the ASA at http://www.asa.org.uk/ the more complaints the more pressure it puts on the ASA and Asda. We have now contacted Asda directly and asked them to withdraw the offensive advert. In the event that they will not we will commence Turkey Sit-Ins at key Asda stores. Campaign Live are also now following our campaign against Asda. Thank you for y…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:59 PM
3

My movember is going well, I have linked up me and a few of my friends with the postoffice courier service who are going to match any donation we make. So thats our financial contribution doubled. As for my moustache it is not bad, I have been growing it from clean shaven for 4 days now (had to shave for a late halloween party, went as Goku) my girl yesterday said it was spikey on her neck, though to me it looks pretty rubbish and teenage. Last year my tutor called me the prince of darkness by t…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:22 PM
2

People passing out in the street seemed to happen thurs, fri, and sat. As for the girls maybe I was just really lucky? My brother thought the behaviour was pretty insane too. Literally a girl walked up and drank my cocktail out of my straw, then walked away, without saying anything. Maybe she thought it was flirting? I should say that the Danes in general were very friendly and helpful, also the swedes I met over there were awesome.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:23 PM
7

Nope Scottish. My country is way more socialist than america, but Denmark is pretty incredible in their egalitarianism towards their citizens. Students are paid to study abroad, really high levels of welfare and education. I liked the Danish system.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:22 PM
8

I was in Copenhagen this year, was alright, the girls there were nuts though. Never seen such bizarre behaviour, stealing drinks, tripping guys up for fun, was crazy. I liked how safe the city was though, people could drink until they pass out in the street and be safe. I also like how socialist the place was, really seemed to have everyones interests at heart, nice to see that with socialism there can still be egalitarianism of attitude.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:07 PM
9

Very nice. Location?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:49 PM
1

Well Anthoir broc Masculinist wears a fedora religiously, so aye... Maybe...
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:05 PM
21

Eh no this is a very misleading post, any kind of discrimnation in your message or verbal conduct will get you a ban. Sexism has been explicitly added in the new game as a violation, but other kinds of verbal abuse are not 'just fine.' From code of conduct xbox live. "Racial, ethnic, and religious slurs," are forbidden, as is "content of a sexual nature" and "hate speech," but sexism—attacks based on gender—are not explicitly mentioned. Overall I think is a good thing, I'd like less abuse in all…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:49 PM
2

Very cool, nice to see support from the top for movemeber,
/r/MensRights01/11/12 08:04 PM
2

Breaking the x-posting to small subreddits within 24hours rule, though I suppose it would have been ok if you had posted it in it's entirety here as you were the original author. No linking to srs or affiliated rule, violated also. Also this has nothing to do with mens rights, reddit is not the entirety of the MRM, if for some reason SRS succeeded in destroying reddit, we would continue elsewhere.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:41 PM
10

Very cool. I thought it was breast cancer month? Movember next week. Old picture or different in america?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 05:11 PM
2

In Scotland we have the law of Coroboration required for conviction, where any evidence must have two seperate sources. So for example if a it was a DV case where one partner had claimed the other had assualted them you would need either evidence of physical harm from the time, or reports from neighbours of having seen the harm.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:00 PM
18

Blind sentencing, would also remove racism, discrimination, and prejudice from the sentencing. This also would also remove bribery, intimidation, and corruption from the sentencing part of the legal system. First judge is trial judge, he gives verdit. Trial info is passed on randomly to another judge through a lottery system with all identifying details removed from the info, refer to the prisoner as a number or as a genderless term, like prisoner. Trial judge, defense attorny, and prosecutor ma…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:30 PM
0

This article doesn't show that the system favors women. Seriously, anecdotal evidence is not evidence. A single case without stats or academic analysis is nothing at all.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:55 PM
-1

Science fiction? Sounds like an interesting book. Do you remember it's name?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:46 PM
0

the state can be incorrect, but not unjust, according to hobbes. My point is that interpretation of violence is not universal. Thats why I mentioned other concepts. Social contract thinkers are not shit. I would say the solider is violent, I don't belief non human entities can be violent. Yes.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:45 PM
0

Well actually the actions of the state in enforcing it's laws are only defined as violence by anarchists and libertarians usually. Social contract thinkers (hobbes mostly) would say that nothing the state does can ever be unjust or violent. It is sort of relative, which is why i responded relatively. For instance ghandi said that poverty is the worst form of violence, where as I would say it is merely poverty. I wouldn't say violence by proxy is me (accord to anarchist and libertarian ideals) th…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:23 PM
1

Only in the same way that having a state, laws, and a legal system is violence.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:11 PM
0

Again you are arguing from an anarchist stand point, that there's no government like no government. I'll counter with the hobbesian 'in the state of nature life is viiolent, brutish, and short', generally having a well run state improves all the lives of the citizens in it. I a big fan of taxation too. I am pro system and pro government. You empower the leviathan to do whatever it wishes when you choose to live in the state yadda.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:39 PM
-1

I believe annecdotal evidence adds nothing to the MRM, I believe pointing out single cases of horrific crimes actually damages this sub reddit. Just like you using an adhominem that I am using dead children to make a point adds nothing to your post, and actually damages your credibility. When I post I am not going to list every single thought I have, just the ones I feel add most to the MRM. If someone posts about hitler saying that feminists are literally hitler, I will say that post is bull sh…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:19 PM
0

Libertarians and Anarchists would agree with you. I think Economists would agree with me. Gun point? Action taken by the state is justified assuming the state is elected, I am not threatening violence. When I said I'd be pro it, I mean I'd vote and advocate for me, that is in no way gun point. Comparing me to feminists doesn't add anything to your point. I believe we can infact do those thing, and morally too if it prevents the greater harm. In the same way we can 'force' children to go to schoo…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:10 PM
-1

I would hope that feeling sorry for murdered children was assumed. Are you going to comment on every poster in this thread that doesn't mention how horrific this crime is? Or are we just going to assume that basic being a human stuff?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:43 PM
3

Interesting argument. Generally I err on the side of liberty, however I beleive that having children is not a 'right', that being fertile is infact a responsibility that society should take an interest in. The idea that you have some integral right over your reproductive system could as easily be applied to appealing vaccinations, death penalty, imprisonment, tax, etc. I have been pro mandatory birth control for a while now, I believe it would once and for all end the abortion debate and end alo…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:40 PM
-1

Interesting I missed that, I am from the UK where all non-cosmetic proceedures are free. I should have addressed this to the non-universal health care folk. +1.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:35 PM
1

Reported, this in no way represents the views or intentions of the men's rights movement. We only wish for equal rights and intend to pursue them vigorously but non-violently.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:42 PM
1

Steps. 1. Don't get married. ...
/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:28 PM
-2

Noone and nowhere in that article or this thread has presented any statement, rhetoric, or evidence that violence is nearly always male. You know when feminists post a story about a male commiting some act of violence, and go 'see, fucking nasty brutish men patriarchy etc' thats what you are doing here, this is what you are encouraging.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:21 PM
-3

Another article pointing out the bad things one woman did without any reference or purpose towards the frame of mens rights or activism. Yay... it's this thread again. Step one - see a story about something bad one woman did one time. Step two - post as either stand alone story or as anecdotal evidence that women can in fact be as bad as men. Step three- Feminists and non MRA's see thread, wonder what the hell this has to do with mens rights, dismiss the entire movement as dick heads. Nice work,…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:18 PM
1

In my perfect world all medical procedures are free at the point of need. Like in the UK.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:10 PM
-2

Alright lets roll with this, seeing how she stated reversable... I would have no objection to this sort of mandatory birth control if these stipulations were met. Both genders were subjected to this mandatory birth control measure. It is silly to think that only one side of the population having control over their fertility would work, we would simply have the same kind of situation that we are in just now while only women have the power and the responsibility of birth control. It is reversable …
/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:06 PM
7

Prostate isn't testicular. I assume thats the issue. Also your third link is new cancer cases, where as the cancer uk is all diagnosis in the year.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:16 AM
3

Here is more information
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:19 PM
9

My understanding is he was arrested for bear hugging a stranger and refusing to release her.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:09 PM
7

They controlled by field, not by value of work. For instance lets say you and I both graduated in Mathematics, I choose to work as a maths teacher bringing in $55k because the employer is local to my home and I get plenty of time off with my kids. You choose to be an actuary bringing in $200k, cause you are willing to trade your family life for higher pay. Same field, vastly different outcomes. This still comes down to choice. From study 'Occupational factors also drive differences in pay. Altho…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:54 PM
22

This is stupid. They are being paid for the market value of the work, porn and stripping is a traded labour, the market value of the labour is based on usual market forces. The reason female porn stars are paid more (generally) than male porn stars is their is more demand for women(of a certain type and look generally, with notable excepts and niche markets) and there is less supply of the specific type of women than there are of male porn stars. Women who don't fit the specific look the market …
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:13 AM
6

Ok lets imagine that there is a correlation between circumcision and lower rates of sexually transmited disease (even though studies show that the opposite is true for women, men are more protected, women less so. Along with all the huge issues with the methodology in the studies, and the fact that rates of circumcision do not correclate with levels of stds internationally, more studies on lack of correlation.) Firstly correlation is not causation. If it turns out that the reason for the lower r…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:10 AM
1

I'm not saying it's not good politics, I'm saying that he offered positions that effectively only women could be employed in.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:13 PM
2

Her accusations and such like are best dealt with by his lawyer, the best you can do is support him. Men I have seen go through family break ups, even with a crazy, tend to have trouble sleeping and go through a very hard time. Just give the guy a call offering to see him from time to time and keep him motivated that there will be a better time after all the bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:35 PM
6

Tell him to seek legal advice and be there for him, take him out for a beer and show support. That is all you can do.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:19 PM
1

Your post title made me laugh. You realise of course that they are being offended about the wording of a comment 'binders full of women' where Mitt Romney actually admitted that despite having qualified male applicant's he over looked them purely due to their gender in order to find a female to employ. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:07 PM
1

Not according to aoife's definition no. Also not according to genetic sex either. gender wise she is absolutely a woman, but chromosonally she is male. This has already been covered in this thread though, men born with vaginas, women born with penis's, regardless of genitalia it is your dna that define your genetic/biological sex.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:44 PM
1

Interesting post, but definitely not an issue.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:12 PM
0

Really nice post.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:44 AM
10

Why feminists believe there is a wage gap? Either... There is a raw gap in earning between men and women in full time pay. This is provable and undeniably true, what this doesn't mean is that there is any discrimination or that a women earns 72% of what a man does doing the exact same work. When you adjust for other factors the wage gap disappears or reverses, none of the raw wage gap is provably a result of discrimination against women. That the reason the raw gap appears is due to an over arch…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:21 AM
11

Wage gap myth consad study 'The report demonstrates that it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence can confidently be attributed to overt discrimination against women.' forbes article on the wage gap myth 'Academics can debate why men and women make these different choices. The important take…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:11 AM
4

I'll look up one of my old epic posts on the gap and paste it here, I'd best get loads of net karma for it though :P
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:00 AM
9

No, it's not true. What information would you like?
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:54 AM
3

Oh I got your point, just not your purpose. We chose not to link to SRS hear because they are idiots. Would you visit a /mr that is full of the perpetual ad-hominen attacks that are levelled at MRAs? Like the one where I don't see your point, maybe I should make a thread saying a commenter said i don't get the point in his posts, oh god, what an idiot, etc. Like I said, a waste of time.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:05 AM
3

So since we can't link to SRS we are gonna make posts discussing upvoted SRS nonsense that insults as as pro rape advocates? This thread is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 11:55 PM
4

I thought being intact was more common in America?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:32 PM
2

Not a mens rights issue. I consider it self defence, the coutrs have considered it self defence. Even if they didn't it still wouldn't be a mens rights issue. We aren't here to applaud every time a guy defends himself physically against a women.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:31 PM
6

Kurt Cobain was a feminist? Damn consider me converted.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:04 PM
-1

Alright cool. Personally I'm pretty im on vaguely interested in this whole business. Seeing how it isn't illegal I'll leave it alone.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:58 PM
-1

Ok. So is it better or worse? Cause I've read alot of feminists saying the lack of faces shows that it's just sexualization, but then isn't posting faces a greater exposure to supposed predators looking to harm?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:40 PM
2

I think the 'we're next' idea came from the message on /creepshots that said mensrights was next...
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:10 AM
0

I have now looked through /cshots now, to check if you were right, opening the top submission of each different user. None of them showed faces... Maybe some of the links do, but not the top sub's of any unique user I checked.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:07 AM
1

Assuming you mean penetrative sex then presumably the one who physically acts upon the either, since both are too drunk to consent in your scenario. So either the one who penetrates the other without consent(as you say too drunk), or the one who penetrates himself with the others penis without the others consent. I usually avoid these threads because while I agree there is rape hysteria and all feminist thought on the matter, while sometimes interesting, does little to nothing to help solve the …
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:56 PM
7

I think it's totally weird, but it is ok. Feel however you please, but if a dude tells me he's happy he got his finger nails torn out, I'm thinking thats weird.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:14 AM
2

NAWALT
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:13 AM
3

Ok lets imagine that there is a correlation between circumcision and lower rates of sexually transmited disease (even though studies show that the opposite is true for women, men are more protected, women less so. Along with all the huge issues with the methodology in the studies, and the fact that rates of circumcision do not correlate with levels of stds internationally, more studies on lack of correlation.) Firstly correlation is not causation. If it turns out that the reason for the lower ra…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:02 AM
12

Seems similar to the Rayon mcdonalds case. She assaulted the driver first, threatened him first, he struck her once and then threw her off the bus. Wrestling with an assailant who may be armed after they attack you while you are working isn't an option. Hopefully he suffer no consequences, luckily this is on tape.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:26 PM
1

Thanks for the info. I had heard something in passing as I surfed blogs but I never really cared enough to look into it.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:39 PM
10

On Violent Acrez it says it was Something Awful not SRS who took the forum down. Personally I don't care if a pedophillic supporting Subreddit is closed down, though I would prefer it was done through reddit than blackmail. As for creepshots, I don't really know what that reddit was about. pictures of pretty girls who don't know they are being photographed? Not incredibly harmful to anyone, not in perfect taste either. Meh.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:01 PM
2

So your question is if feminism was a perfectly egalitarian movement would I feel differently about it? Yes, of course.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:14 PM
1

Moustache, my third year of growing a bad teenage looking moustache. Got called the prince of darkness last year for my evil looking tache, hopefully the nickname is a yearly occurance.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:10 PM
1

Yes, and yet genitals do not determine the biological sex of a person. By the same reason some people are born without genitals, or lose their genitals due to injury, yet they retain their bioliogical chromosonal sex. Gender is more fluid, sex is not. When he says biological women, he means anyone without a y chromosome. Also ability to have children, or fall pregnant also doesn't determine your sex. Chromosomes do, only your genetic make up. Otherwise you have just made all infertile women men,…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:37 AM
1

I would ask: what they have been smoking and where can I get some?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 09:34 AM
4

Book marked, awesome study thanks.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 11:13 AM
1

Reminds me of this video the end conclusion at 12.10 reminds me of this 'it only takes one girl to change the world. This is not necessarily a bad movement, I don't think anyone is on the other side of the debate. More education is good, I don't know why they are targetting women in particular. Though there is a whole bunch of studies at shows the more education a girl gets the fewer children she has, one of the issues in third world countries is an explosive population rise. So yeah, I'd prefer…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:31 AM
3

Comments are good. '#1 will get you an assault charge. 2 is theft. 3 cannot be used because he can sue for the ring back (think binding contract, you didn't go through with it, you don't get the ring). 4 libel or slander lawsuit. 5 theft, again. Plus now you get to deal with the insurance hike, since your the 'forgetful' one... 6 remember that may not be the only nude photo of you he has... 7 destruction of property. 8 libel/slander and possible assault (or damages for undue stress, as it may be…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:58 AM
3

No I don't agree, a mother is not integral to all areas of her childs life in a healthy relationship. People need space to grow. Edit - Ah, you are posting nazi quotes to antagonize /MR, i gotcha.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:54 AM
0

The one is 1877 is without the 90% unreported adjustment, after adjustment it's still 1 in 188, which is insanely inflated. Good link.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:14 PM
2

I have always wondered, and maybe someone could link me a source, where does this idea that men aren't afraid at night come from? When I walk down the street if I see a threatening, or drunken, group coming towards me I get a rush of fight or flight through my system, especially if I am by myself. Academic source please, showing that men aren't afraid, not people citing the idea.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:34 PM
2

Anonymous applications prior to interview, have gender, race, sexuality removed from CV's / application's. Have a merit based anonymous interview conducted via pc screen etc. Problem solved, all sexism racism removed from all employment in one swoop. Then I am voted jesus... 'But wait, surely in some jobs people need to look a certain way, need to be good looking, customer service need to be clean neat and tidy' have any dress code and standard of tidiness and hygiene you want, the idea that peo…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:32 PM
4

Either use shitty logic that your opponents use or you aren't one of us? That makes no sense. Just because rape culture theory is wrong doesn't suddenly mean you get to be wrong.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:27 PM
1

Yes rape is under reported, along with every other crime. However when even self reported anonymous studies like the CDC need to inflate the rate of rape by using insane misrepresentations (such as counting attempted rapes as rapes, or scaling sexual assaults into rapes) I continue to believe the issue is heavily exaggerated. The usual logic is that 90% of rapes go un reported, which seems random as theres no way of knowing how many unreported crimes there are, since they are un reported, howeve…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:47 PM
4

I wouldn't say theres a biological difference that stops women sexually assaulting passed out drunk guys. Speaking from experience, and I'm sure there are a ton of guys in here who have awoken with a girl on top of him or with a girl's mouth around him. Biology indeed.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:50 PM
5

Yes, that is wrong. People have a right to get drunk without getting harmed.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:59 AM
0

I agree.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:58 AM
7

The opposite of being raped isn't being falsey accused of rape, why not put up posters with complete gender reversal, saying 'just because you helped him home... doesn't mean you get to help yourself', 'sex without consent=sexual assualt', 'don't be that girl', and have a young woman helping a passed out guy into a taxi. Or you could find out how many girls have reported being raped (freedom of information) at that college, then post the raw numbers. It'll likely in the the region of 2 per year,…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:54 AM
7

This idea that we should pay for people to have children in order to fund future generations only works if there is a lack of people having children. population in the world is sky rocketing, creating incentives to have more children and passing the burden onto employers is farcical.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:22 PM
7

'The equal pay for equal work thing is complicated. The figures that are usually quoted, which in the US are that women earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by a man, don't take into account the fact that women usually work shorter hours than men. If you eliminate that discrepancy the wage gap is tiny.' Oh wow, a hardened feminist just admited the wage gap is bullshit. I feel really sorry for her son, alot of feminists espouse this end of men theories and patriarchy nonsense without a thought o…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:20 PM
6

I've seen this image so many times, of course patriarchy dones't exist so I guess noone holds that men are etc...
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:14 PM
10

Title 9 guarantee's equal opportunity to play in all sports, unless you are better than the average girl i guess?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:18 PM
1

Books mostly, I try to pick up a feminist written book whenever I'm in the library. I read one maybe once a month.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:06 AM
1

Makes me feel less of a MRA for not being invited to the secret club, is that where we do the chanting and drum circles too?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:15 PM
1

Much like the way I wish mainstream Feminists objected to Radical feminists. Which sometimes the do liek the transphobia issue. Perfect, we are in accord.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:49 PM
6

Umm what? If you are a transwoman thats post op presumably you do not have male genitalia? So by lord's measurement you are infact simply a woman. Buck Angel has a penis, and by Lord's definition is a man. Transphobia is more the hatred of transpeople, not the ignorance of using genitalia alone to measure gender. His definition also misses out castrated men, who are still men, it is not however castophobia. Personally I define sex by dna and gender by choice, but whatever.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:44 PM
1

I apologise, I misread the table heading when it said intimate vs stranger in the table. You are correct.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:41 PM
3

I think we are in atleast a similar place when it comes to gender and other rights issues. Do you hold that there is no place in the MRM for extreme beliefs? For those who would be our version of Radical feminists? While they will from time to time embarrass the movement, at times their outlandish views and actions will lead to a larger debate of the issue that will leads to results. I hold that without radicals politcal philosophies are slower to evolve.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:39 PM
1

Fair enough, no harm no foul.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:35 PM
5

Sorta made me laugh, shame the basic premise of your movement is the hated of men :P
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:34 PM
1

They use misleading facts that say since men are most of the CEOs of large corporations, that means men rule the world. Fact is, there are more women middle-managers (at least from what I see when I worked in corporate settings) and the idioms and memes of the day are all anti-male. I don't even need to bring up the laws. men are most of the CEO's of large corporations, also some men(and a smaller number of women) do infact 'rule' the world. Just because they don't use their power to benefit men…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:33 PM
3

Ah fair enough, though 600 silly people aren't all that bad. Plus it's not incredibly malcious, more just untrue and stupid. Whatever floats their boats.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:23 PM
2

Define egalitarian please. I do not believe men and women are exact copy equals, nor do I believe they have the same capablities in all areas. I do not think there will ever be absolute equality due to these biological differences. I do believe in equality of opportunity and treating people as indivduals rather than by their collective group. I always thought I was closer to a liberal feminist who believed that there should be absolute legal equality, though I am more conservative as i get older…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:20 PM
1

Thats just for domestic violence, in total victims of violent crime men are far and away the overwhelming majority, but whatever. It doesn't actually matter who suffers more, unless you are launching anti violence initiatives that only help and protect one gender... Vawa?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:15 PM
6

We don't organise for the sake of downvoting things...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:00 PM
9

Where and when do these downvoting brigades get annouced? I have never seen an official organised downvote brigade on /mr. If someone links a part of the reddit community to /mr and it's members downvote then thats just how it goes, are you saying that /mr members should only remain in this one subreddit? That we shouldn't contribute and be a part of other communities on reddit?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:00 PM
15

You don't have to say yes to consent, nor do you have to say no to remove your consent. Consent is more fluid than that, actions you take, the way you behave, etc. I don't expect peopel to be mind readers but if someone for instance strips off naked and starts taking off your clothes I'd assume they are consenting. I accept there are some grey areas but in general it should be pretty clear, if it's not clear or you feel uncertain then ask. While in general girls don't like guys to ask permission…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:57 PM
3

Yeah ok the picture is vague sexist bullshit. Does it really get you so outraged that the vein throbs on your forehead?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:52 PM
8

The premise of their politics is that in general men as a gender hold the power in the society, and that in general the use of the power is harmful to women as a gender. Though that would only apply to current patriarchal Feminist thought(with the usual men using power also harms men nonsense). I wouldn't say the premise of feminism is the fear, loathing, and comptempt of men and masculinity. Presumably Liberal feminists who merely seek literal legal equality between the sexes are ok with the MR…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:49 PM
3

Anonymous application for jobs and tenure would likely work, similar to how they do in orchestras, have the applicant fill in their achievements on their application and then have them tested in house for the position. Might slightly favour people who are better at tests than lab work, but for lab work positions you could have a lab work based test.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:50 PM
1

MechPlasma or rottingchrist would make pretty good mods, they are both consistent and moderate MRAs.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:25 PM
2

Nonsense un-academic study. Doesn't factor in the longer life span from better food, medcine, higher quality of life, being kept out of battle, higher security and protection offered to the ennuch group. It says in the article that all the ennuchs lived in the palace but spent much time outside out it, however the life of a ennuch was that of a guard, someone to watch over the wifes, daughters, and harem of the noble families in the Korea. At the end it says most male nobility lived to about 40,…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:39 AM
3

Done and posted on my Facebook. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:03 PM
3

Warren farrel - the myth of male power and others Sex-Ploytation by Matthew Fitzgerald. The Rantings of a Single Male: Losing Patience with Feminism, Political Correctness... and Basically Everything-Thomas Ellis these books are probably worth a read too
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:55 PM
4

He is being sexist. If he said feminist I'd say ok he is slating a political ideology as being illogical, but he said women. Thus sexist.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:31 PM
7

At first i thought that despite the obvious literal objectification of men that this could be an internet dating site that reversed the current industry model of men contacting many women and then the women selecting the best to accept. However, looking through the site, once the man has been 'bought' by a woman then he has to pay the site for the right to contact her, it's the same old model only with zero repeat spam from men who are only allowed to offer a sale to a women(the equivalent of a …
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:20 PM
2

Arguable evidence is not evidence. being submissive to your partner in bed is (arguably) the supressed desire to do so on a personal level. Based on what? Say I like to use whipped cream in bed, is this a result of my suppressed desire to put whipped cream on my partner in our everyday non-sexual lives? i did not say that at all 'women feel bad about their inner urge to subordinate to men and feel that this urge was conditioned by society, so they don't get tired to deny that this was given by n…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:01 PM
10

I don't think you really understand progressive sexuality. Being submissive to your partner in bed is not submitting to them as a personal level, it is closer to submitting to your own pleasure(with the exception of those who use being a sub to be lazy and/or inexperienced in bed). The fact that there are some submissive women doesn't mean that all women long to be subserviant to men, nor does the amount of submissive men mean that men desire to be subserviant. Sexuality is not an extension of y…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:42 PM
5

I don't like censorship so I appreciate the comments in the thread who have spoken against tearing these posters down. Just put the Pro-male posters back up and let the feminists rehash the same lies. SPLC again.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 09:11 AM
3

I would say it's possibly a censorship and privacy issue but it's certainly not a MRM issue, you have my upvote.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:54 PM
17

The title of this post hurts my head.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:24 PM
4

Another article with the exact same spin and exact same information
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:17 PM
76

My understanding is that out of countries who iq tests this researcher examines 3 showed women having higher IQ and the rest showed men having higher IQ? found the source 'He collated IQ examination results from countries in western Europe and from the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Argentina and Estonia. These showed that in westernised countries the gap in scores between men and women had become minimal. The data for making exact comparisons was sparser and could be carried out for only a…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:16 PM
5

Yes I accept that you require controls for occupation, education, experience, hours worked, hell even height if you like. However none of these factor in to having a higher raw number of women, since it is an average. I'm not saying this shows a discriminatory wage gap, I'm just commenting that the raw number of women vs men doesn't matter as it is an average. For instance if you had one man who happened to be the exactly average man and compared his wage to the average of 10 women who are exact…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:54 AM
8

I would argue that it's tha damn Matriarchy harming men, Just look at the gap, look at the raw unadjusted gap! If it wasn't for the oppression...
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:29 AM
5

Why would the raw number of female workers affect the part time wage gap? It's an average of all part time wages.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:28 AM
3

Thanks for the easier to link source.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:37 PM
5

Not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 10:14 PM
3

'my next thought was, "Oh, shit. Are guys actually dumb and debased enough to come to this sad sack's rescue?"' Slams on guys who allow women to take advantage of them as much as he does women who take advantage of men. he doesn't say all women, doesn't generalise. 'Honestly, in the 21st century do some women still' -some, not all. The only issue I have with that post is that it's annecdotal, but since this is a safe space for people to vent their frustrations I'll let it pass. Upvoted to 31 is …
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:15 AM
12

The girl is in College, she is not 15.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:48 PM
3

I thought pan-sexual was the attraction to people regardless of gender identity? Regardless of sex would be bi-sexual?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:43 PM
3

What the fuck.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:29 AM
1

A nice reductio ad absurdum.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:23 PM
1

TIL... what an asshole.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:06 PM
2

• Poor male outcomes in health • Poor male outcomes in education • Discrimination in the work Place • Domestic violence against men • Discrimination in law • Uneven distribution of work place deaths • Bias against men in family courts • Parental alienation • False accusations • Negative portrayal of men in the media • Negative stereotypes of men in contemporary culture • The prevalence of male genital mutilation • The "gender empathy gap"
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:35 AM
6

Wait this is a real story? Not an onion piece?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:11 AM
9

Exactly the point I was about to make, 12% think badly of women and 13% think badly of men, but somehow women still the victims...
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:02 PM
-7

I disagree. The % make up of a community doesn't give it an absolute freedom to hate those not represented. in a room with 100% white guys calling each other nigger doesn't suddenly become ok. Games and all things should be open to everyone, having a community that is segregated and perpetually others minorities does not allow for an equal opportunity to partcipate. It as always comes back to equal rights, I actually consider the constant drivel from gamers to be the fault of the large game comp…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:36 PM
4

She is quite obviously contrasting that tweet to the advice wome nare given at times to avoid being raped.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:33 PM
3

Still hunting down that gotcha moment?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:58 PM
2

I was thinking random crazy was to blame until this post.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:41 PM
2

I provided you with links of /mr supporting the rights of those you say we are not addressing, it's simply not the primary focus. here are the mens issues I always post when asked what the MRM is for. • Poor male outcomes in health • Poor male outcomes in education • Discrimination in the work Place • Domestic violence against men • Discrimination in law • Uneven distribution of work place deaths • Bias against men in family courts • Parental alienation • False accusations • Negative portrayal o…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:36 PM
8

The mrm is not monolithic, there is alot of disagreement over this issue. I am pro choice, both for men and women. While I accept the biological reality that as it is a womens body she should have exclusive right to decide to have a physical abortion, men should have a right to parental termination of rights and responsibilities, or a financial abortion as it is often called. I would also add that I feel with rights come responsibilities, I believe all men and women should have access to fertili…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:24 PM
1

I don't know why you were downvoted, which is against this threads instructions and goal. I up voted to balance out. All issues we are interested in also affect black, BGTQ(men cannot be lesbians) men, and disabled men. I have at times seen 'this is not a mens rights issue' though never in reference to a gay mans issue. Could you provide a citation? Is your issue that there is little advocacy in the MRM that exclusively deals with these sub-sections of the male gender? That the MRM is too broad …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:18 PM
1

For some reason I cannot comment on anything on that subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:41 PM
3

I often try to play devils advocate in order to understand my opponents argument. Reasoning 1 - There is a huge amount of money tied up in the rape advocacy industries, there are huge vested interests in keeping rape a special crime that requires special attention. This reason follows the line that most feminists are simply useful idiots. 2 - I can accept without evidence that women fear rape far more than reasonable based on how likely they are to be raped. thinking about rape on a daily or wee…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:33 PM
4

7) oh hey it's this post again.. 'NAFALT Feminists fight AGAINST men's rights. Here are some examples to prove my point. Father's rights group want shared parenting (equal custody) to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit. They feel that men should not be punished for being men, and that women should not be awarded custody to their kids simply for being women. Currently women are awarded primary custody almost all the time, even if the husband was the stay-at-ho…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:21 PM
11

Hello in the news, I have looked out sources for your viewing. Note I understand that not all feminists are like this, and that feminism is not monolithic, and that you disagree with the views I am linking you. 1) femithiest who has taken her blog down '1) Castration Day: The purpose of this day is to pacify males for further processing, meaning, in the end, the majority of them would eventually be terminated, and this holiday would no longer be entirely relevant at a certain point – the day of …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:20 PM
2

Victim shaming, much like all the other 'shaming' issues (slut shaming, fat shaming, creep shaming) can be attached to rape culture or patriarchy theories. However it doesn't make these theories any more real, I can't say these things never happen, but I can say they don't exlcusively happen in regards to rape. Most crimes, not just sexual crimes, go unreported. Part of that may be due to a feeling of helplessness, or of the authorities being powerless to help, or of society shaming/blaming the …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:20 PM
3

Funny title, pretty short retort for an article.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:00 PM
4

Sadly yes, some people who identify as MRA's do have very extreme and incorrect views. Some seem so extreme and idiotic that they come across as a false flagging feminist, you can find plenty of examples on david futrelles site of idiots who identify as MRAs.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:55 PM
3

Our community is not a singlularity, noone can speak for every MRA. However speaking for myself I do not believe rape culture exists any more so than assault culture or murder culture. I cannot hold true that in every culture in every part of the planet trivialises rape which makes rapists feel that rape is ok and therefore causes more rape. This is despite the vast arrays of different cultures and values throughout the world and all evidence to the contrary, for example accused rapists being mu…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:52 PM
30

Hello there Dystro. Let me begin with highlighting, as others have already, that the gender of the perpetrator doesn't matter. We advocate for the protection of the victim and the improvement of mens rights regardless of the cause of their issues. However let me address some of the points you made. 'It isn't women raping men in prisons' according to the US doj, on page 6268, there were 91,400 incidents of rape or sexual abuse of inmates in prison in 2008, of which 27,800 involved a power imbalan…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:43 PM
1

Glass cellar mentioned in esquire, times they are achanging...
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:45 PM
8

Wow this is fanastic, loaded onto my facebook.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:04 PM
9

From an old post of mine. more likely to suffer emotional stress [Children from fatherless homes are*: • 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders • 4.6 times more likely to commit suicide • 6.6 times more likely to become teenaged mothers • 24.3 times more likely to run away • 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders • 6.3 times more likely to be in a state-operated institutions • 10.8 times more likely to commit rape • 6.6 times more likely to drop out of school • 15.3 tim…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:21 PM
6

I'd be comfortable with anyone of any gender assuming they are competent in their role. Being uncomfortable with someone due to their genetic make up is pretty abhorrant to me and one of my major issues with womens shelters and some feminist theory. Even if the person in question is a victim of a horrific crime I don't believe you should adapt to their prejudices simply for their comfort, for instance in womens shelters no males are allowed on the premises for the womens comfort. As it is assume…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 07:31 PM
32

This is a pretty funny tumblr actually, Thanks for linking it.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:18 PM
1

Only mentions MGTOW, not MRA nor MRM. The seperatist movement has a place in the MRM like lesbian seperatism had a place in feminism, it is not however the entirety of the movement.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:16 PM
3

Men can be feminists, feminists do not equal women.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:20 AM
1

'Pamela Grannum A man cannot be raped. Sex is a mental and physical exercise. A man cannot have an erection if his mind is not into it. The story said that the man gave into the womens' request. I think he died of a heart attack brought on by exhaustion.' Comments might break your mind some. 'when the five other jealous wives attacked him with knives and sticks. It's unclear what injuries he may have sustained during those attacks. The women demanded he also have sex with them, and he resisted a…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:29 AM
24

pouring drinks on people in bars sounds pretty juvenile...
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:22 AM
7

Yeah it also mentioned a bunch of other sites though? Not just exclusively MR. With such a large community some of the MR guys may be involved, but 4chan trolls are hardly the substance of the subreddit and we can't be expected to, nor can we, control them outside of editing/downvoting posts on our subreddit. Some quotes from feminisms '9GAG WAS HERE XDXDXDXDXDXD ' 'Why People did this to your site For the lolz Hue hue hue hue' 'I believe that there are things that we know, and that we dont know…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:51 AM
3

The supposed health benefit studies have all be roundly trashed again and again by peer review, the research I cited hasn't been. Flawed mothodology is obvious, just because you cannot understand something doesn't make it untrue. However to give you some insight, the foreskin is the male lubricant, ever try having un-lubricated sex? it's shit for men and women. The foreskin covers the corona of the penis on as you pull back before thrusting again, this prevents the corona from scraping out the f…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:46 PM
5

Well the guy you are referring to is actually circumcised, he is not intact. So presumably he is getting his information first hand. However here is some info sure. circumcision reduces sexual pleasure in both men and women 'Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas w…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:33 PM
0

Feminism is not monolithic, while some individual feminists may believe that 'a woman should never be hit (even if she deserved it) or should have doors opened for her, chairs pulled out for her, and her dinner paid for.' not all do. Also while I advocate violence when it comes to self defence or the defence of others, noone man or women deserves to be hit, I'm not sure what your getting at with that. How individual couples choose to pay for dates is not a mens rights issue, improving mens choic…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:16 PM
0

Angry Harry on equality being unachievable Equality of opportunity is fine, absolute equality in all areas is not even possible due to biological, psychological, and socio-economic differences. We are physically different, do not have the same mental make up, and make difference choices in society as a result.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:50 PM
10

source 'Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted. '
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:33 AM
1

Feminists do not equal women.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:06 AM
1

I don't really know how to address this one. Your all free to have sex or not to have sex with anyone you want. That being said, selecting potential mates based on their race is pretty abhorrant, rather than selecting then based on their character. Don't choose not to have sex with American or western woman, choose not to have sex with jackasses and choose to use protection if you are afraid of foul play on her behalf. I know that right now men have very limited reproductive rights and the safer…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 09:43 AM
3

Paste bin link By Erin Gloria Ryan May 17, 2012 11:50 AM A Clever Plan to Breed White Ladies Out of Existence I'd like to take this moment to thank Men's Rights Activists for filling my cold black heart with delirious glee every time they come up with a new dumb idea. The newest one? White dudes, tired of the uppity bitchiness of western women, should marry a smiling, submissive brown lady, like the kind that wear banana necklaces in those racist pre-1960 cartoons that they're not allowed to sho…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 09:33 AM
3

Can't help you with statistics but read this article for mens rights activits in Canada. Also this article](http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2011/07/female-violence-societys-dirty-little-secret-especially-in-alberta/)
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:19 PM
1

Yeah it's certainly interesting, I'd post it to more appropriate forums than mens-rights. As transwomen are women. try lgbt, egalitarianism, femra, feminism, twox, hell even rad fem subreddits.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:07 PM
5

kerfuffle? Interesting series of tweets. Outrageous to have a gender segregation at all, bad to have transphobic gender segregation. So if your born a women and become a man, then your a man, if your born a man and become a women, then your a man... Fucking radfems. Gonna be an interesting conference 'o Radical feminist critiques of gender and queer theory ' is gonna be pretty fucking ground breaking if they are reducing women to being walking wombs.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 07:50 PM
2

Not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:51 PM
2

Horrific video. Then the man ends up being sent to jail for 3 months. Solidarity to my Egyptian brothers.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:31 PM
4

Less protection by not automatically assuming they are telling the truth? Increased accountablility, and allowing due process is not less protection.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:31 PM
3

Maybe they can hand out fliers saying prisoners can stop rape...
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:58 PM
3

refuse to be a slave There is always a price to pay friend, and I deeply symphasize with your situation. In the end you need to do what feel right in your heart.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:57 PM
1

I'm from the UK so only know UK activists but sure. Fathers rights Domestic violence scotland Parity Accurate statistics Save services There is also a huge masculinist movement in India, I don't have access to their deal though.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:52 PM
36

This is incredibly worrying. With the UK governments consultation of blocking questionable sites (porn mostly) in a consultation phase this could severely damage the MRM. Imagine you had to opt in in order to acess information about the MRM, that would be devastating to the spread of information.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:31 PM
6

Ok so the advantage of having two x's is beign less prone to genetic disease. Accepted. Now the advantage of having an xy is that men expose defective genes... Ok if you say so. How about that the y chromosome is evolving faster than the rest of the human genome? Also the advantage of the xx only affects the minority of people as most people do not have a defective gene, however all the men who have intact genes are benefitting from the unknown benefits of the 78 additonal genes. Every gene has …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:00 PM
8

When did protection from genetic defects becomes inherently superior to genetic diversity. Men whos X chromosome is not defective have 78 unique genes with unique functions some of which we do not understand. having an additional 78 genes or having a duplicate of the x chromosome does not inherently imply superiority either way, both have advantages. Downvotes to a discussion about chromosomes? I see...
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:14 PM
1

Voted yes, easy decision.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:05 PM
1

Yeah but hes Scottish... hes also correct. I don't see any reason he should pull his punches to avoid sounding disruptive, when confronted with a lie the only response is truth.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:33 PM
13

Sounds reasonable for professional leagues too. Rather than having gender segregated sports, or serperate tournmanents for men and women, simply have the athletes divided by skill.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:29 PM
2

Well they are opinion pieces written by external and internal authors... like all editorials. Hey maybe they will add the MRM at the end of the year, but until we all get report to the DOj along with the skin head nazis it's just not true.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:18 PM
6

Myth # 1. Single moms cannot give their children the same love and attention as married couples more likely to suffer emotional stress [Children from fatherless homes are*: • 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders • 4.6 times more likely to commit suicide • 6.6 times more likely to become teenaged mothers • 24.3 times more likely to run away • 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders • 6.3 times more likely to be in a state-operated institutions • 10.8 times more likely t…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:12 PM
1

Except their end of year report to the DOj where they list hate groups, and their advocacy work.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:26 PM
1

See my reply to WyleCavu further up.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:23 PM
3

No I suspect it's the lack of male teachers from primary to secondary school, the heavily slanted against boys feminised education system, and the mostly female teachers marking boys down compared to girls... Now ask me for sources? teachers marking down boys Feminised education system http://www.manwomanmyth.com/video/education/introduction/ http://www.manwomanmyth.com/video/education/nursery-and-primary-school/ http://www.manwomanmyth.com/video/education/secondary-school/ http://www.manwomanmy…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:20 PM
3

Actually yes. Yes all three are editorials. Being in their quarterly review is not the same as being added to their hate group list they give to the DOJ.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:11 PM
6

That article is an editorial, not the SPLC. That article is like Rhiain Morgan being published in apple magazine saying that the blackberry is better, it doesn't mean that apple is saying black berry is better. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/hate-map Point out reddit /mensrights to me on that hate map. 'The Southern Poverty Law Center counted 1,018 active hate groups in the United States' More importantly they do not, and I repeat, they do not report on new hate groups until the end of th…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 08:58 PM
-3

Woah jesus if this is true it is absolutely insane. Agent Orange just cannot be stopped.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 08:39 PM
5

http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-mens-rights-hate-group-splc/ 'We reached out to SPLC Intelligence Report Editor Mark Potok. Here’s what he told us in an email: "It's false. We wrote about the subreddit Mens Rights, but we did not list it as a hate group . . . "In almost all cases, we list hate groups at the end of each calendar year when we publish lists. I very much doubt we would ever list the Reddit [r/MensRights] in question—it's a diverse group, which certainly does include some misogyn…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 08:35 PM
31

Umm... not a mens rights issue?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 08:26 PM
2

Another Scottish MRA? Me too brother.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:11 AM
1

Would be more interesting if you stuck to pulbic figures who came out in support of the original list.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 12:26 AM
4

Seeing how neither rape-culture or creep-culture exist it seems pretty unlikely that your paper is going to have much of an academic basis. Goodmen project post by riot girl on rape culture being made up 'Sometimes a privilege denying dude can be right. a bit like a stopped watch I guess. Rape culture does not exist. Rape is an action not a culture. Domestic violence culture? homophobic assault culture? Football violence culture? Child abuse culture? Racist attack culture? These are all acts wit…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 12:10 AM
2

Nah you done the right thing, you can't throw down with every jackass in the street. Really his words are just wind. It's just that I personally get awfully pissed off at petty street bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:59 PM
3

He said you were part of a gay boyband? What a homophobic asshole. I hate petty shit like that, I mean it's not as bad as violence but it ruins your whole mood. Also how is that even an insult? There nothing wrong with being gay and there sure as hell is nothing wrong with being boyband pretty.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:54 PM
-7

Oh god with the equivocation '"We know from our work that it's not all about dollars but also about time spent and there are a significant number of women who volunteer on a regular basis instead of or in addition to making generous monetary contributions."' Can't men ever in any way be the good sex? Do we always have to equivocate? Men give more to charity, so what? Why say 'well maybe women spend more time doing charity work' when you have done no research to present this thesis. Hell if men a…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:51 PM
5

Interestingly in the UK the top schools for both GCSE and Higher results are all boy selective. Always the same all boys schools are the absolute best, trumphing the all girls selective every time. Additionally parents are now investing more in their boys education than their girls, sending their boys to private schools in order to avoid the discrimination that exists in state schools.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:49 PM
2

All university examinations and course work in Scotland is anonymous, atleast in Strathclyde, Glasgow, and St andrews. I suspect it is universal.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:47 PM
13

Thanks alot sir, you are a gentlemen and a scholar.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:43 PM
5

Why is it probably due to sexism instead of being probably due to factors they haven't modelled? From the consad report linked earlier. 'The report demonstrates that it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence can confidently be attributed to overt discrimination against women.'
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:11 PM
4

You would rather he gauged his value as a human being based on what others think? Funnily enough women don't know what it means to be a man, listening to women about how to be a man is ridiculous. You think women give a fuck about men who tell them where their place is and isn't? No, that'd be ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:06 PM
1

Could be for employment in a womans shelter? They don't allow men to be inside the shelter so would need to find only women for all jobs that need to be done in the shelter.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:01 PM
4

Right so one MRA claims MLp has some feminist conspiracy and you out this one MRA. One Feminist blog claims MLP has some racist, sexist, and etc conspiracy and is outed by pigman. So why are you rushing to the defence of commenters who noones has criticized? I don't understand. 'it's often less goofy than serious feminist opinion.' was presumably what you were objecting to, however this is obviously a serious feminist opinion of one self proclaimed feminist, Kathleen Richter. Now lets stroll thr…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:17 PM
3

Irony! < note this links to manboobz, so avoid it if you hate that site. So david futrelle finds one poster on /MR that relates MLP to mens rights and proceeds to mock him. Then one of the largest feminist blogs in the world proceeds to relate MLP to feminist issues. Great stuff.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:59 PM
2

Did you not see the comments on This thread which all said the original post was ridiculous, yet you still used the post as evidence that mras are deluded. Yet whe na major feminist blog goes on the deep end you equivocate with NAFALT, nice work.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:41 PM
4

And the control over when you have children shifts entirely to men in one fell swoop... I think this will be as key to the liberation of men as the pill was to women in the day. No longer will any man be forced to have a child against his will. Trully this is an exciting break through.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:35 PM
2

Really? This teacher flat out admiting to discriminating against boys is actually him discriminating against women by subtley implying that they are weak? Victim mentalities...
/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:45 PM
3

Also HPV vaccine prevents cancer, no need for circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:28 PM
2

This is the entire article.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 07:55 AM
4

Why Are Women Assaulting Men In Florida? It is the undeniable truth that any question you can ask along the lines of "Why is ____ happening in Florida?" is just begging to be caught in an unanswerable, endless French curl of your own imagination. Is it because it's hot all the time? Or you see alligators on a daily basis? Let's just remove the question mark: What the fuck is wrong with Florida. In December, a Miami woman beat the shit out of her ex-boyfriend with a mounted deer head when he brok…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 07:55 AM
26

Also they including women who have only suffered through an attempted rape as a rape victim. Just saying.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:58 PM
4

Actually children, disabled people and the elderly are physically weaker than women which is why they tend to be the targets of assaults, thus they are the ones who require a rights movement and protective laws. No wait, men are the strongest and the victims of most crimes? Wow you mean that physical weakness isn't the same as physical vulnerability? Thats crazy. etc.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:45 PM
4

http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf page 18 and 19. in the last 12 months. Women 1.1% experienced either rape, attempted rape, or alcohol facilitated penetration. men 1.1% were raped by envelopement. I assume this is what word shark is looking for.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:40 PM
3

Seems like more affirmative action this time in the private sphere. So called Benefits include additonal mentoring, support, access to closed markets, and of course womens groups advocating on behalf of your business. Making the private sector a little bit less competitive.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:39 AM
3

This has been all over the Facebook mens rights groups.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:54 AM
3

Ok I'm not sure PUA's do preach this but lets assume they do. The MRM is not monolithic, we are not going to agree on every possible subject. Anyone, of any political persuasion, who is active is working towards improving the average life outcome of men is my poltiical ally. Work together where we agree, disagree where we disagree. Be pragmatic about it, we are not ideologues.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:02 AM
1

Completed.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:13 PM
6

Really throroughly decent video, more of a poetic discourse than academic work but still nice to see such a young man speaking out against discrimination.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:54 PM
1

Well I'll run through my normal thoughts and arguements on the subject. Firstly the rights of a child should not supersede the rights of men or the rights of women. Children are not more important than adults. If they disagree and say that the interests of children are more important than the rights of adults then you can respond by saying then every adult should pay a huge rate of tax to be given to all parents in order to further benefit children, as the interests of those children supersede t…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:58 PM
6

'Both people made a choice to have sex and the outcome can sometimes be a child, so in that case the father did have choice This flawed logic could also be used to ban abortion, noone should have parenthood forced upon them. Consenting to sex is not consenting to being a parent. 'If the father does not want anything to do with said child he can hand over parental rights and thus will never have to pay for the child if it is agreed upon by the mother, which I have seen happen' No this doesn't hap…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:30 PM
6

Link to post with source of how feminists have had a negative impact of men's rights
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:13 PM
1

Dam straight, I would like to have seen a rejection but it's already been watered down slightly and gone are the days on unanimously passing special interest bills.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:25 AM
1

Nothing but respect for Bob geldof. I guess his openess and first hand experience of male rights issues has had an impact on his daughters too. She hasn't actually taken up the MRA mantle perse, but she has become an icon for the intactivist community.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:23 AM
1

Traffic violations warrant being assaulted when?
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:16 PM
2

http://www.abusedmeninscotland.org/ I don't know what part of the Uk your in but these guys do good work.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 09:43 PM
1

Well he also left out the part where the man got his nose broken, then drove over a woman's toes when attempting to escape his assailant.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 09:41 PM
9

Insane story, I'll be sure to look out his autobiography in the library. Shows the devastating effects of placing legal might behind sheer hearsay.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:46 PM
1

Although presumbly the end of men is indeed the end of the fictional patriarchy it seems a disengious position to take that CHS swayed the audience to vote against her.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:41 PM
8

I haven't listened to the debate yet, but the stats on the site don't match what your saying unless there is more polls somewhere? Christina Hoff Summers appears to have lost the debate 66%-29% with 5% undecidied.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:06 PM
1

The bbc? NOW? Linda Kellys academically submited work?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:08 AM
0

Well there is no study that can show what your looking for, only convictions or estimates but here is one from 2009 which was available in the side bar 'Women comprised a larger percentage of all unique perpetrators than men, 53.8 percent compared ■■to 44.4 percent; and'
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:11 AM
-3

Isn't this author a manzboobzer/srs regular? Skipped this artcle.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:08 AM
2

NAFALT 'Recently we've had some articles by feminists such as Amanda Marcotte and Hugo Schywzer arguing that the solution to men's issues is more feminism. All issues that men face are due to patriarchy and toxic ideas of masculinity, which feminism fights. Therefore feminism is the answer. In fact, the complete opposite is true. Feminists fight AGAINST men's rights. Here are some examples to prove my point. Father's rights group want shared parenting (equal custody) to be the default if both pa…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:06 AM
8

Poor male outcomes in health Poor male outcomes in education Discrimination in the work Place Domestic violence against men Discrimination in law Uneven distribution of work place deaths Bias against men in family courts Parental alienation False accusations Negative portrayal of men in the media Negative stereotypes of men in contemporary culture The prevalence of male genital mutilation The "gender empathy gap"
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:02 AM
-1

Don't visit jezebel read my copy pasta of their article instead.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:03 PM
3

Reddit Is Officially the Worst Possible Place for Rape Victims to Seek Advice It's hardly breaking news that Reddit, the gigantic, decentralized, self-proclaimed "front page" of the internet, is frequented by both intelligent users and complete assholes. A minority of the latter group have found a home in misogynist reddit subgroups, from the more ideological r/mensrights to the full-out disgusting r/rapingwomen and r/chokeabitch. Reddit founder Alexis Ohanian once told Jezebel that this type of…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 10:59 PM
1

Is nice to see both sides of the anonymity for accusers debate given so clearly. Whats that everyone agrees that anonymity is absolutely essential? Well shit, I guess encouraging people to make accusations is more important than the right to face your accuser or due process...
/r/MensRights23/04/12 09:32 PM
3

I am what I am, I try to do good. But I'm not going to flounce cause you insult me.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 09:30 PM
3

Nice straw man, or more accurately strawmen. So it's only rape if she's unconcious, not barely concious and hardly in control of her actions. - No I said that it would be rape if she was unconcious, in this case both of the two other people in the room said she was in full control of her actions. I don't need to mention every possible scenario which would be considered rape, for instance you never mentioned forceful rape in your comment therefore I see, forceful rape isn't rape eh? thanks for cl…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 09:20 PM
3

Um, no, no witnesses saw her unable to stand. That never happened. At all, at any point in this case. On cctv she stumbled into mr Mcdonald (the guy who was found innocent) however stumbling on cctv does not mean you are unconcious. The other guy flat out admits to having sex with the same woman, that'd be evidence enough if this was rape.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:53 PM
2

More great spin from the police, the important part is of course the Domestic violence order banning the man from his own home.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:37 PM
9

more on the story My understanding is the women was ruled too drunk to consent to sex and therefore the sex was rape, and yet his friend who also had sex with her was found innocent. So two men have sex with a woman, they both say it was consensual she says she doesn't remember what happened. Therefore it was definitely rape. Now drunken consent is a real grey area, however this woman was not passed out nor was she according to the statements of the two men out of her senses. They both say she w…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:35 PM
1

This idea of unpaid servitude by women has been disproved over and over again. link from 2010 '"Men do substantially more hours of paid work," she adds. "Women's time is divided more evenly between paid and unpaid work." Hakim's conclusions are, she writes, the logical outcome predicted by "preference theory" -- the notion that in a free society, people will gravitate toward the type of work they prefer to do. She predicts that "a sizable minority of women will continue to prioritize home and fa…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:21 PM
4

Nice premise but once against frames the issue with women in mind. Despising masculinity is bad cause it's bad for women, no fuck off, despising men and masculinity is inherently bad you biggotted misandrist.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:55 PM
1

Let me say it quick and clearly. Noone ever deserves to have parts of them cut off. Being am asshole, or a criminal, or indeed anything doesn't mean you deserve to suffer because of your actions. You remind me of the scumbags who says men who go to jail deserve to be raped, or women who get drunk at parties deserve to get raped. You can fuck off.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:28 PM
7

'“Back then, we never prosecuted boyfriend-girlfriend cases anyway,”' I'm calling bullshit. 'We solved a problem that didn’t exist and created a problem that wasn’t here,' Yep more bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:23 PM
2

Solidarity to your brother. Thats a tragic story that I have shared with my friends and group.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:04 PM
12

Your second example would force the girl to bring the child to term, force her to remain pregnant against her will. I know that abortion is a fairly hot topic but thats the only issue I have with your examples. I feel you'd be pro parental surrender.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:08 PM
4

We should probably say Academic sources thanks...
/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:58 PM
3

please flag the video on Youtube also
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:09 PM
2

This is not a gender reversal it is a promotion of one gender alone. Previously the Genders were at near parity. 'In 1997, 56% of young women and 58% of young men felt the same way.' Now for some un-named reason female priorities have shifted while males have remained unchanged. 'Two-thirds (66%) of young women ages 18 to 34 rate career high on their list of life priorities, compared with 59% of young men' Also when you read the report this has only affected young women, across the entire gender…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:00 PM
2

I'd say definitely, it would ease the awkward situation where sometimes you can make more money by working less hours due to the 15% of your already taxed wage going to your ex. Note I am refering only to the UK situation. Personally I don't think there should be any child support system at all, it seems to be simply re-distribution of wealth. If the best choice you can make financially is to flee the country then you have some pretty fucked up laws. (note most guys stay due to love of their kid…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:50 PM
2

Wow good news. There seems to be alot of pressure and movement to reform alimony lately, I can't see any organised effort thats having such an impact but the same thing happened in minesota recently.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:40 PM
9

consad study 'The report demonstrates that it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence can confidently be attributed to overt discrimination against women.' forbes article on the wage gap myth 'Academics can debate why men and women make these different choices. The important takeaway, however,…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:38 PM
4

No, the SPLC has never labeled MR as a hate group Also the title is very misleading, the Radfemhub didn't begin fundraising for the SPLC until way after a contributor produced the piece on alleged mysogyny in the MRM.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:29 PM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:30 PM
3

David Futrelle... stopped reading there. Ok I took the plunge and actually read the article. Simply because the gap isn't entirely explainable by known factors such as life choices, age, hours worked, and etc, does not mean that the remaining gap (from article between 4.8 and 7.1%.) is automatically from discrimination. Saying theres an observable difference, we don't know and can never know exactly why this gap exists, therefore it must be discrimination and sexism is ridiculous and infantile. …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:19 PM
2

You messed up the link pretty badly, edit it so it works please.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:48 PM
4

Saying yes when secretly you wanted to say no, with no coercion or force is not rape.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:57 PM
4

It is unreasonable to expect Mras to devote a devote substantial attention specifically to helping feminists in order to prove their potential as allies, because frankly they have bigger fish to fry. Some of the feminist concerns you mentioned are indeed valid, and most MRAs would not oppose you in pursuing them, but you can't fault them for spending their scarce time advocating the issues that have a more direct effect on them. In any case, it's unlikely that any MRAs would have any interest in…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:14 PM
0

Yeah this a picture of a women holding a blank sign. Are you sure you linked the right article?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:08 PM
1

Join a mens reading group, donate to mens support groups, write to your MP highlighting issues that concern you.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:48 PM
1

I know my political allies when I see them, feminists are not on my side. The reply I left you lower down in this thread shows that feminists, despite all the chat, have never done anything to help men. I like to think I am pragmatic at heart and would love to work alongside anyone interested in helping people, so as turn about is fair play... Why are the third wavers not joining the MRM in our common ground and opposing the parts of the MRM that offend them? the MRM is also not monolithic and I…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:45 PM
2

I'm incredibly excited about this product and with over population becoming a hot topic I hope that governments around the world will start funding this since big pharma isn't. This article however is horrendous. 'men supposedly want this technology only in order to avoid baby-trapping' 'Given that 1 in 5 women experience sexual assault in their lifetimes, one would hope that this offensive and ridiculous argument would have faded away'... umm what? How are those two even related? 'I think shift…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:39 PM
1

Tyler Durden in Fightclub 'A generation of men raised by women. I’m wondering if another woman is the answer we really need.' Also his complete rejection of the normal societal path for men. 'go to college, get a job, “I don’t know – get married”. In other words, follow the formula.' Ghandi "Be the change that you want to see in the world." "I look only to the good qualities of men. Not being faultless myself, I won't presume to probe into the faults of others." John Kennedy “A man does what he …
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:29 PM
1

Dam straight.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:22 PM
3

Don't get married?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:19 PM
1

Subtle political commentary?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:18 PM
1

Feminism is not monolithic and has no fundamental definition. First, second, third waves all disagree. Liberal, marxist, radical, lipstick all disagree. 'Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture' a feminsit book dedicated to limited the scope of womens choice, criticizing womens choice to act like men. Your arguing basic semantics, we have all seen NAFALT a thousand times before. If a feminists do it and you don't like it, then it's not feminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:17 PM
1

Well it hard to play that one correctly, especially in public. Presumably you want to stay with the girl so you can either chat it out with her and tell her it's unacceptable and that the mockery is also out of order or you can respond physically also(note I am not advocating violence, only a playful physical response to her playful physical blows to the stomach), maybe a smack to the ass with enough force to make her yelp would work? What you cannot do it allow it to continue, if shes hurting y…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:03 PM
1

Hey guys you can't just go around changing your facebook status without expecting to pay the price. Though I'm not certain what the bowling alley owner done to deserve it, maybe employing her ex is enough.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:50 PM
3

I was going to spend time responding but hell. Not all feminists are like that. Or no true scotsment fallacy right there, sure the article shows prominemt feminists like Hillary Clinton insulting housewifes but hey, thats not feminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:44 PM
6

http://agentorangefiles.com/ http://www.impactnottingham.com/2011/12/the-new-sexism/ 'I was in a bar, having a nice drink with my boyfriend when a man looked at me from across the room. Suddenly, I exploded into a tirade at my boyfriend about how men are sleazy, stupid, ignorant and how women are by far superior.' http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/ Recently we've had some articles by feminists such as Amanda Marcotte and Hugo Schywzer …
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:41 PM
2

consad report on pay gap 'The report demonstrates that it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence can confidently be attributed to overt discrimination against women.' It cannot be proven now or ever that any discrimination against women exists when it comes to the pay gap.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:34 PM
2

Would you prefer “If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight, even though the ruler forbid it; if fighting will not result is victory, then you must not fight, even at the ruler's bidding.” Doesn't quite fit the situation.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:30 PM
114

That in every culture in every part of the planet trivialises rape which makes rapists feel that rape is ok and therefore causes more rape. This is despite the vast arrays of different cultures and values throughout the world and all evidence to the contrary, for example accused rapists being murdered by their local community. Seems like rape is taken pretty seriously everywhere, but hey some comedians make jokes about it and people sometimes like to hold to innocent until proven guilty in rape …
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:28 PM
2

'EDIT: I should also mention I will never ever strike her or any woman in retaliation or for any other reason.' Woman with a knife? Woman attacking a child? Female suicide bomber? Female combatant in military? Female opponent in martial arts competition? For the love of god even Mras are putting women on a greater than human pedestle. I have had some carry on fighting with girls in the past, when a girl hits me I tend to hit back. Not in a full force contact kind of way but in the same way I'd h…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:25 PM
3

We'd ban the users who made the evil comments and offer support to the suicidal person. It wouldn't affect my membership to the community unless it was done as matter of course or encouraged by the leadership.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:16 PM
3

Sadly MR is being inundated with trolls lately posting stories asking for advice and sympathy in order to later attempt to cast MRA's in a bad light. Please don't be offended when you see alot of messages either implying that you are a troll or casting doubt on your story, the sheer amount of attacks this sub reddit has come under lately has actually started to affect the reaction of the community which is a real shame. Firstly normal disclaimer, possibly this story is not true, it's a throw awa…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:13 PM
113

I'm not sure if hes serious or if hes making a comment on how ridiculous the concept of rape culture is.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:45 PM
5

Wow thats distressing. I cannot understand how they can ignore his cries for help. Is the joke in the pages comments really neccessary? 'what a shocker(seriously)', can't the torture of a disabled young man be taken seriously?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:27 AM
4

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” Guess they are fighting dirty, but still fighting.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:15 AM
1

Wow that is impressive work, bookmarked for when the inevitable denial and revisions happen on manboobz et al.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:00 AM
5

There is of course a chance that this is a ruse, however that doesn't make the actions of those who persecuted a suicide risk less disgusting. Some terrible bias in the reporting of mens rights as a women hating sub group too. I'm pretty cut up by the suicide really, however this article does not prove in anyway that the sister is fake or that the suicide is a ruse.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:41 AM
4

Ah actually Germanys rape law is very fair, women have been charged previously for raping men in their sleep. All sexual acts without consent are considered rape there regardless of gender. One of the few countries where women have been charged with rape in Europe. Perhaps the thailand Journalist isn't aware though?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:59 PM
2

It is possible that in Thailand that women cannot legally rape men. Or to make it clearer that the legal definition of rape in Thailand doesn't include women on male rape, which is why sexual assult is used in the article. The US had a similar problem until recently, although their definition still doesn't include rape by envelopment which is by far the most common form of female on male rape.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:44 PM
3

http://www.manwomanmyth.com/video/misandry/rape/ My understanding is that accusers are granted anonymity in order to encourage complaints. However the accused are not given anonymity in order to allow others who have been victimised by the possible rapist to come forward. However this means you are sacrificing the lifes of all the innocent men accused of rape in order to make it slightly easier to convict serial rapists, aswell as creating an incentive for unscrupulous people to use to system as…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:58 PM
0

Nice to see some gentle sexual ability shaming on my way to fish...
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:04 PM
2

Man this post has left me drained. I'm gonna take a break. RIP Jerry.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:19 PM
6

Challenge violent masculinity is alright though? Their goal isn't even to end violence against women but to 'explore ways to end mens violence against women'. This whole meeting is ridiculous, shaming and disgusting. Next week a meeting aiming to end black violence against whites anyone? fuck this 'teach-in'.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:41 PM
4

So you think this was a racial thing instead of a gender thing? Despite all evidence showing that the number one thing you can do to have a reduced sentence is be female?
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:38 PM
9

While I personally disagree with Doxxing it's a risk everyone takes when posting online anonymously. Do you also disagree with the Agent orange exposure of some of the most prominent feminists condoning gender based genocide and eugenics? They were all posting anonymously on Radfemhub, while generally trolls are trolls some people are too dangerous to have their anonymity respected.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:37 PM
0

Did you not read the addendum at the end? 'I am not painting men as incapable of controlling their sexual impulses, but simply acknowledging that there is a tiny fraction of men who, for whatever reason, won’t. And I am suggesting that if women are concerned about their safety from a crime like rape, a common sense acceptance of that and choices consistent with that knowledge are in order. I may not have said it as delicately as some would prefer, but the message was clear nonetheless.' So hes s…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:27 AM
2

The MRM is not monolithic, there is noone male or female or can agree to all the things MRA's say since at times we directly disagree with each other.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:33 PM
3

Just don't get married...
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:12 PM
13

Presumably the lesson should be to sign a prenup?
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:00 PM
1

'The Four Truths and Twelve Principles of Masculinism All Men are Men. All Men are Good. All Men are Worthy. All Masculinists are Dutiful. All Men are Men. A Man’s self declaration makes him a Man. A Man’s thoughts, feelings, words and deeds are always Manly. Therefore, a Man is always a Man. All Men are Good. All Men are able to practice kindness, respect and love. All Men are redeemable. When Men practice kindness, respect and love misandry ends. quoted text All Men are Worthy. All Men deserve…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:31 PM
1

Interesting explaination as to why women who become pregnant 'for them' or through deception eventually all take child maintenance from the unfortunate dad. No real morality in the article just pure economic theory. The comments section has filled me with hope. Chriss webb 'women have the finale say in who they want to be with. Men just couple with the willing. World wide. In all cultures. For all of recorded history' is his first comment then... 'The more I think about this article the more pis…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:01 PM
1

Or to give guys the option of financial abortion. Or indeed to make men the prefered custodian of children. Infact removing all financial and social incentives would work.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:02 PM
2

'Page not found' Maybe It's been moved?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:45 PM
3

Yes, testsoterone leads to justice and fairness, not to agression and violence. http://www.topnews.in/health/testosterone-leads-fairness-not-aggression-25272 'The common belief that testosterone causes aggression in humans has been debunked by researchers.'
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:16 AM
-1

Marilyn Monroe came 5th? Travesty of Justice!
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:10 AM
1

Score one for the Rad fems claim that all PIV = rape. Whats interesting though 'whether they for instance had engaged in gentle or rough sex, or whether they had used condoms or sex toys.' So use of sex toys in lesbian relation ships does as much damage to the vagina as rough sex? Silly fucking rad fems.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:07 AM
1

I've done nothing to address the rates of abuse, however with that in mind there is significant evidence that in the catholic church known abusers were protected and moved around church to church in order to avoid scandal, futhering the numbers of abused. Also the access to children and the protection of the children was vastly different, alot of those abused in the catholic sex scandals were orphans or in the catholic churches care. 'To go along with the "higher rates of child abuse" line in th…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:01 AM
1

No, no i did not. I compared % make up in sexual tastes. Are you going to say that being attracted to kids is a choice any more so than being heterosexual or homosexual?
/r/MensRights30/03/12 02:53 AM
0

I know that in this particular case, this particular man purchased a child for £5(no idea what this is in todays value) I do not believe men are driven to prey on children any more so than I believe men are driven to be gay. There are however some gay men out there as there are some predators. Social norms do affect what age of women men choose to have sex with, you notice how much porn features 18 year olds? Social norm. I did not at any point suggest that the people who were using the 13 year …
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:41 PM
3

I like the objection and outrage over the concentration on womens attire instead of over the casual accusation that all men are rapists. Fuck Indonesian's religious government.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:27 PM
3

Really? I knew women dominated in nursery and primary education. I thought that by secondary and tertiary education there was closer to equality of representation of the genders. Still interesting hypothesis as to why women are so over represented in this article.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:23 PM
4

Averagely 20 offenders and 20 victims per page, 13 pages, 260 victims. In what way is this more than the 'approximately 10,667 reported victims (younger than 18 years) of clergy sexual abuse' in the john jay report? This isn't the kind of activism I like, simply highlighting that women are equally capable of commiting horrific crimes does nothing to further the interests of men. Downplaying the huge amounts of abuse that happened in the Catholic church also only erases victims.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:19 PM
5

Good article if a little short. I'll keep my eye out for the inevitable sacking/not renewing his contract of this professor.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:14 PM
3

At the bottom of the article where you can look through other student sex scandals some 90% of the perpetrators featured are women... I didn't expect that. Either theres a complete lack of male predators or the huffington post choose to selectively choose women to feature.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:06 PM
2

Embogenous already covered it, but it is not the minimum age of consent that caused these young men to go to jail but inadequate discretion and understanding from the legal system. 13 year old children being physically sold on the streets is pretty repugnant, thats what he fought against. The minimum age of consent effectively all but ended child prostitution (it is very rare in the UK), while future misuse of the law and unfair practices of holding only males responsible for consensual underage…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:52 PM
4

I copied the exact same quote, guy sounds like an inspiring fellow. Was willing to sacrifice is reputation and even face jail time to help expose the spate of child prostitution. Hell of a fella, what a hero. 'While editor of the Pall Mall Gazette in 1885, he “bought” a 13-year-old girl for £5 in an attempt to expose the scale of child prostitution. Although he was jailed for unlawfully kidnapping a minor, the publicity the case generated led to the passing of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, whi…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:18 PM
1

Wow great quote, gonna be a meme asap.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:35 PM
2

The mrm are trying to make things better, the pua's are just trying to enjoy themselves while things fall apart. I have alot of respect for some PUA's(roosh) but I judge them individually, they are on the same page when it comes to the destructive nature of feminism but that doesn't make them our political allies.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:07 PM
3

PUA is not related to mens rights.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 07:23 AM
1

And multilating the gentials of defenceless, consentless, infants is an act of pure unadulterated love? Those who are strong have a responsibility to defend the weak, with the full 'force' of the law too.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:48 PM
1

Force? Sorry Bartab I don't understand what you mean.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:40 PM
3

I'd ban neonatal circumcision, that'd probably have the largest single impact of how men and mens sexuality is viewed by society, also it would completely solve one issue, rather than just improve a situation.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:21 PM
6

I'll reply from your edit. 'Since this is set up so I cannot reply (typical of men, shut the woman up)' Presumably you are referring to reddit as being men? You could have replied if you had waited. 'Tell me how women have more rights than men.' Ok women have more rights regarding reproduction. Men have no rights regarding reproduction, women have in the most western countries the right to have an abortion with no equvalent financial abortion right given to men, women have the right to name the …
/r/MensRights13/03/12 01:39 PM
2

http://www.facebook.com/Fathers4Justice http://www.menznet.org/2012/03/mumsnet-and-hate-crimes-against-boys.html
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:30 PM
2

http://www.menznet.org/2012/03/mumsnet-and-hate-crimes-against-boys.html http://www.facebook.com/Fathers4Justice Sorry don't know why the links didn't post with my original.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:30 PM
2

https://www.facebook.com/Fathers4Justice?ref=ts http://www.menznet.org/2012/03/mumsnet-and-hate-crimes-against-boys.html Don't know why the links didn't work when I posted this in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:29 PM
1

Only has 32 readers, and many circumcision fetish sites exist, along with thousands of other fetishes that may not particularily suit your sexual tastes. I say leave them to it, they are not advocating for circumcision and the comments I read actually said they disagree with infant circumcision, if for some reason they find cut and damaged genitals sexy then leave them to their fetish.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:16 AM
11

'I just can't see any reason to continue this existence any more. Time to add another notch to the statistics. I guess SRS and 2X can rejoice, one less man, one less MRA in the world' Leaving the world? Adding to the statistics? One less man in the world? You didn't see this as a sucidal cry?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:52 PM
20

Srs job.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:20 PM
9

Save being on there is pretty crazy too.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:13 PM
30

Farewell? What the fuck? Thats heartless this guy is contemplating suicide and you quibble over whether 2X is as bad as SRS?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:53 PM
700

Black where are you at? Post a phone number or something dude I'll call you just now and we can talk about this. Don't do anything drastic and don't hurt yourself. Things get better, maybe take a break away from the world of mens rights and the misandry in the normal world and just relax, spend some time alone reading and pursuing some hobby, enjoy the mudane things. There is alot of shit out there, and seeing it on this reddit sometimes bums me out too but there is also alot of joy and great th…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:52 PM
2

Scottish here, we were kilts all the time. Well not every day, but it's not uncommon to see them worn both formally and casually.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:24 PM
1

why LGBTQA, why not QUILTBAG? Though I'm not sure teaching sexuality in school is the way to go, seems like it would gender enforce, yet maybe it could help children identify their own sexuality.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:20 PM
1

You feel sad then only vote for pro male politicians. You then become an activist in a fathers rights movement and change the law in your state.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:01 AM
4

Or you could just use a steroid cream and stretch the foreskin out over weeks. But yes in the rare case of infant phimosis where operation is the only option then it is better than death.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:32 AM
4

Well thats the saddest story I've read to day. Bummed out before a maths test, good times.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:43 PM
2

Quite possibly, still if we were to assume there is a benefit to their use then that benefit will exist in every trial, not merely rape trials.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:48 AM
8

Wow I'm pretty sure I have read many feminist article decrying the portrayal of gender roles in disney films and others, I'm glad that the MRM are maturing to the point were we can waste our time on non-issues too.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:16 AM
2

While I understand the need to try to connect this to the male issue of false rape accusations, presumably if the court or judiciary had faith in polygraphs they would use them in every criminal case?
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:14 AM
3

I know alot of people use zie when they aren't certain of the gender of the person they are refering to.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:08 AM
3

You sound like a very young man so perhaps you should consider that having a child isn't the absolute worst thing that can happen to you. Firstly inform her that immediately upon her giving birth that you are going to get a DNA test done. You should be ready for the possibility that she is indeed pregnant with your child, it's not an ideal situation. Thankfully being young you likely don't make an excessive amount of money and your child support payments should not be too severe. I have seen in …
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:06 AM
2

Just don't stress about it and continue to be all you can be. If it's really an issue expand your social interaction by taking up new hobbies, sports, anything where you interact with new people. Small town life can be pretty severe when it comes to ostracization but aslong as you still have your close friends and you are still enjoying life and being happy then just let it be beneath you. As for similar situations I'm sure many a man and woman have had an ex say pretty nasty things about them, …
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:58 AM
11

I would argue that men are infact more vulnerable, you are confusing weakness with vulnerability. Men are more likely to suffer a violent attack and to be a victim of crime. Simply because women are generally physically weaker than men does not make them more vulnerable when most of the attacks men carry out are on other men, it's like saying children are more vulnerable when in reality children are very safe in public as any passing by adult would help a child in need, even if it meant endanger…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:58 PM
0

Can't downvote this enough. You guys are on the same side, you disagree over a whole load of things sure. But you should be able to recognise your political allies when you see them.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:15 PM
14

You vetted the oxford journal and found it wanting? You vetted every medical association in the Netherlands and found them hardly worth citing? You are arguing from ignorance or aka shifting the burden of proof. The very source you cited is a 30 year old single study. Logical fallacy away.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:41 PM
12

The oxford journal? Lack of academic Gravity? Compared to your single study from 1982? the AAFP even say it has a high complication rate, but you are being willfully obtuse. Hell how about: This viewpoint by the KNMG is jointly endorsed by the following scientific associations: π The Netherlands Society of General Practitioners π The Netherlands Society of Youth Healthcare Physicians π The Netherlands Association of Paediatric Surgeons π The Netherlands Association of Plastic Surgeons π The Neth…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:03 PM
6

Check out register her dude.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:00 PM
12

She has turned comments off mate. 'Well, I have had enough, so no more comments. Have fun guys.'
/r/MensRights27/02/12 07:02 PM
19

Oh hey disagreements, lets delete all the comments disagreeing with the article then close comments. Along with horrendous misandry, 'I really am beginning to wonder if male reading comprehension is that abysmal out there.' Oh a blanket claim against all men. Along with a huge lack of research into the topic. The author admits to putting years into discovering the true depth of FGM but takes a single organisations 'estimate' to be bible. 'Moscucci reports that circumcision was imposed in an atte…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:54 PM
2

'The rule change illustrates how a politically desirable goal like cracking down on so-called deadbeat dads can have complicated, even counterproductive, effects in practice.' Fuck right off.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:02 PM
12

Where is the shame there? You do not need to supply information about your sexual history or your contraceptive choices to your partner. I prefer honesty and openess but that doesn't mean that consequenceless lies are inherently evil. How wrong is it to lie to your partner about you having had a vasectomy? It's pretty dishonest but it has no consequences, noones life is ruined by your lie. 'vindictive pieces of shit' yeah cause the ultimate in revenge is not getting women pregnant, or indeed bei…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 06:04 PM
2

Perhaps the ceremonial pin prick of the female genitals is more comparable in your eyes to the non-consensual removal of the most sexually sensitive part of an infants penis... Not all female circumcision is that severe yet all is illegal in the western world. 'removal of the clitoris?' Also i assume you mean removal of the external part of the clitoris, last time I checked the rest of the clitoris is left intact, therefore it's ok yeah? Aslong as it's only a little of the genitals that are bein…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:42 PM
1

'Men who are falsely accused of rape often have their names published and their lives ruined even if they are not convicted or charged - their accuser is protected with anonymity and is likely to face no punishment, or a light one' Re-word this part 'their accuser is protected with anonymity and is likely to face no ' to 'their false accuser' Remove 'Isn't it just about misogynists wanting to oppress women?' Let not perpetuate slander against ourselves. After 'Despite men's need being arguably g…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:11 PM
5

Wow that is some impressive academic work. 20 years of data studied? 'There are constant and unsupportable allegations that women suffer discrimination in these arenas, and we show conclusively that women do not' That is a huge assertation no make, it's nice that you only have to analyse 20 years of data to prove the obvious.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 03:55 PM
0

The op has not said that a female firefighter can't do anything because she is a woman, you are fighting imaginary sexism. The op's claims is that this particular fire fighter was employed as a result of her gender 'she was employed for reasons of political correctness' rather than her ability or through merit, the employment of women to positions they are not suitable for because of their gender through affirmative action is not uncommon in the UK, it can in the case of safety critical roles le…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:13 PM
-1

Just to say this thread is featured on manboobz so lets be sure to get as many srs trolls and false flagging mysogyny into the thread as we can.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:06 PM
0

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/higher/dr-paul-irwing-there-are-twice-as-many-men-as-women-with-an-iq-of-120plus-426321.html 'Neither is "smarter" than the other' vs 'All the research I've done points to a gender difference in general cognitive ability. There is a mean difference of about five IQ points. The further you go up the distribution the more and more skewed it becomes. There are twice as many men with an IQ of 120-plus as there are women, there are 30 times the number of me…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:43 PM
1

Sounds good to me, although I don't tend to like the idea of equality as the genders are not equal, egalitarians tend to ingore the major differences. Not in a man > women or women> men way, just that each gender has obvious differences both physically and psycologically. Still I am glad to have read your posts and revitalised by your openess to mens rights.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:31 PM
1

http://www.manwomanmyth.com/equality/a-tale-of-two-firefighters/ Is a pretty interesting article about the employment of female fire fighters in the UK. The possible effects of lower standards of entry etc. It also features a female fire fighter taking on a physical task on a game show. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERwzqvs7vvU&feature=player_embedded Hopefully thats useful for what your looking for?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:22 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:17 PM
3

Why would anyone assume rape? Something like this happened to a friend of mine, during sex he tore a cyst that was inside the girl he was with, he then drove her to the hospital. Noone in this case assumed rape. Why would anyone assume that simply because of a rare sexual injury that there must have been a rape? This attitude is pretty distressing and almost makes this a mens rights issue. If the boy in the story is being summoned to give his side of events 'just in case' a rape happened this is…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:10 PM
1

Well thats a nice start, now please tell me why all feminism isn't wrong? When there is obvious injustices and discrimination that affects all people of all genders, why have feminism at all? Why does is suffering of women more important than all human suffering?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:02 PM
12

To be fair you guys are being a little unfair, her 'underlying anxiety was a mitigating factor' to the false accusation. Actually I'm not sure anyone who has underlying anxiety should be charged with any crime. Also I'm pretty sure men can't ever have underlying anxiety and therefore only men shall be punished for their crimes. QED.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:57 PM
2

Well this might be the craziest Feminist argument yet. Will every social rights movement be coopted by feminists? Will we one day see articles and essays saying that the MRM is also related to feminism as the issues facing men hurt women the most?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:55 PM
4

It's been the policy of MR to quote story posts for some time now LAMFF. I don't think you need be offended by it.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:46 PM
4

Guess there are no sick men or boys there?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:44 PM
1

Well schrodinger's rapist is not a reductio ad absurdum like his cat essay. If you accept in principle that some women feel uncomfortable in public due to the percieved threat of violations of their physical boundaries, Whether rational or not, you need to either choose to make concessions in your own behaviour or not to in order to make people feel more comfortable. I can see why having strangers who do not know you considering you a threat is offensive and I am not endorsing the schrodinger's …
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:40 PM
1

An appeal to majority does not prove a point. Lets take a vote? No lets continue on the line of critical thinking, constrasting with racial and anti women stereotypes (although the intelligence thing has some supporting studies) was a good move.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:50 AM
2

Congrats to the new mods. I'm always admired Celda's work here, though I've never heard of Eeph.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:19 PM
1

Yeah sorry you are right, my first post is badly worded.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 02:04 PM
8

Ditto. Previously when I'd heard pople being called a circumcisition fetishist I just thought it was intactivist labelling. Much like Feminazi, now I see that there are actually people who can't get enough of circumcision... the world is a dark place.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:52 AM
9

'Gloria Steinem is an extremist feminist pushing an anti-male agenda that has been widely accepted as just and correct, to the detriment and expense of the rights of men everywhere. Feminism is by it's very definition an anti-male endeavour whoes primary purpose is to promote and elivate the interest of women at the expense of the interest and rights of men. Our society has fallen hook, line and sinker for the feminist dogma of "women as victim" promoted by Ms. Steinem and her ilk to the point t…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:19 AM
1

Everything under the cut + a not my message disclaimer posted.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:28 AM
5

It is hardly fair to compare a department of justice study based on self reporting to a CDC study based on anonymous survey. Both used very different methodologies and weighting in their estimations of rape. For instance the Department of Justice has estimated the number of rapes that occur outside of prison and place it lower than the number of rapes they estimate occur inside of prison. The article you have outrightly declared to be untrue compares those two figures based on research from the …
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:06 AM
9

This is a fake troll account thats been active for a whole of 2 hours. This is not a real MRA nor does he/she represent MRM views.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:16 PM
1

Apples = oranges etc...
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:27 AM
8

'On average, women are discriminated against more often than men (one only has to look at studies of pay differentials to see this). But it is nonetheless interesting and thought provoking to see that gender identity can cut both ways.' He cops out at the end, accepting blindly the wage gap myth. Why did they not do the same experiment in so called male dominated fields and see if women are discriminated against? The findings of the research is incomplete, they have found that men are discrimina…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:18 AM
5

Real good article by one of my favourite MRM authors Kyle Lovett. Give it a look.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:04 AM
3

'young women just give up hope and decide it’s better to be single than sorry.' young men just give up hope and decide it’s better to be single than sorry. Oh snap.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:49 AM
-2

Nice catch jeremiah, this dude is a troll.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:27 AM
1

AH shit I'm in a troll thread, posted by the troll king. Citing a blog post from 2011... Dam it.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:46 PM
7

Wow you've cited a report that gives the prisoners self report victimisation, not the number that the BJS gives for male prison rape in 2008. The report you've chosen to use as the holy gospel by the BJS says that 72,000 prisoners self reported that they had been sexually assaulted. However the BJS itself along with prison rape advocacy groups state that self reporting is problematic among the prison population due to a variety of factors including intimidation, possible reprisals, etc. The main…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:42 PM
2

300,000 a year is higher than the total of all other reported rapes... You mean reported to the police? In the self reported CDC self reported phone survey all other rapes where much higher, they didn't even contact prisons. US women Completed forced penetration 620,000 US men Made to penetrate 1,267,000 From the last 12 months part of the survey, far higher than the 300,000 prison rapes. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:51 AM
0

It has to work both ways. If the accused name is made public then so too should the accusers. From the post you linked. 'In criminal court, it's usually something similar to "The People v." where the people may be represented by a state or commonwealth, which gives the people the right to demand to know who they stand against and why' The anonymity of the accuser prevents the people from having the right to know who they are standing beside and why. 'For the police, publicizing the name is a tec…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:01 PM
4

'An uproar has gone through the population -- around a dozen women came to me and complained' A dozen women complained... an uproar!
/r/MensRights31/01/12 01:50 PM
2

Man what does 'If she does, pull a Leykis hail mary.' What is a Leykis hail mary? I googled it and got radio shows...
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:08 AM
2

Reductio ad absurdum, way to go mooksie. Stomp all over the pro circumcision bull shit.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:42 AM
2

here you go. 'Conclusions Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted. ' http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/40/5/1367 Most of the information I have on circumcision relates to the risks and immediate consequences to…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:39 AM
2

Please read this before you get married. http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:49 PM
5

I'm pretty pro free market most of the time but price discrimination under certain circumstances does have a flavour of injustice. For instance would you be pro caucasian night? Where the bar or club owner charges white people cheaper prices for entry and drinks? That'd be fucked up yeah? Ladies night is similar, discriminating based on gender is silly. Yes I know it makes business and economic sense but only because other business are allowed to compete in the same way. If the practice was bann…
/r/MensRights12/01/12 01:24 PM
11

We have no problem with the perpetrators of domestic violence being arrested regardless of their gender. Those who carry out intimate partner violence should be arrested. The main MRM talking point on this subject is the presumed guilt of men in DV cases along with mandatory arrest policies where the male is always removed from the home regardless of whether a crime has been commited and sometimes regardless of evidence. 'Paradoxically, feminist concerns for female victims may also have led to t…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:33 PM
4

http://madamenoire.com/71376/he-said-what-words-that-warrant-immediate-dismissal/7/ Can We Have Sex With Other People? So he wants his cake and to eat it too? He wants to be with you but have sex with other women. While open relationships are not as condemned as they used to be, who really likes to share? His honesty and boldness to even ask the question may be appreciated, but the fact that he wants to share you with others and wants you to be cool sharing him is grounds for automatic dismissal…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:57 AM
1

'Anti-circumcision bills were the next step, he warned.' I fucking hope so. If hes right I suddenly support the movement to ban the religious ritual slaughter of animals. 'Only 2500 cows were slaughtered for jews compared to 500million for the rest of the population' so what? I'm sure less murders and crimes were commited by the minority jewish population compared to the general population but that doesn't mean you legalize minority crimes. If the inhumane slaughter of animals is considered ille…
/r/MensRights04/01/12 09:25 PM
6

Little bit about about the UN's condemnation of Isreal's treatment of fathers in divorce custody proceedings. http://www.israelnewsagency.com/ununitednationsdivorcefatherschildrencustodyisraelwelfaretenderyearsdiscriminationpasgenderbiashumanrightsfamilycourtsministryjusticejewish48061111.html
/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:14 PM
1

Is there a second link I'm missing? This one shows her weeping sure. Where is the female rapist part?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:28 PM
5

Hey erg0S4m, did you check the oxford journal link? http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/40/5/1367 I say damaging your sexual function for the rest of your life is indeed diabilitating, 'really not bad at all' is indeed also subjective, it's hard for me to point to pleasure that you have never felt and say thats part of why circumcision should be illegal. I couldn't explain sight to the blind, nor sound to the deaf either. Simply put you could be more, I'm not sure what age you are but I believ…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:17 PM
7

Man this guys a hero, I wish I could do more to support him. Hes been shut down twice, now hes asking why. http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2011/07/female-violence-societys-dirty-little-secret-especially-in-alberta/ More on him.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:02 AM
7

I have never considered how someone who is circumcised would feel to being told that circumcision is wrong/genital mutilation. You could point to the numerous deaths circumcision causes, all of which are avoidable (some 200 in the USA, although many aren't written as death from circumcision) also the loss of sexual function http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/40/5/1367 or just ask your friends if they had ever actually seen a circumcision? Even the people who carry out circumicisions tend to a…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:50 AM
2

Suspended normally means that if he is convicted of another crime within the 6 months he will need to serve his 6 months ontop of whatever additional sentence he gets for his new crime. Probation normally means he needs to adhere to certain conditions set forth by the court in order to avoid a sentence.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:23 PM
3

Wow thats a weird one, he wasn't charged with rape but with sexual abuse. He is not going to serve any prison time, but even 6 months suspended with 2 years probation could be seen as harsh for what is a case of mistaken identity. 'The man should have ensured that the drunk woman knew it was him she had sex with.' Thats a bizarre judgement, this is however a very unusual case. The judge didn't throw the book at him, nor has he been placed on any kind of register. I'm not entirely sure how you ar…
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:15 PM
3

One in five American women will be raped in the course of her lifetime' Article doesn't say what ratio of men will be raped. '“These forms of violence take the largest toll on women, who are more likely to report immediate impacts and long-term health problems caused by their victimization,”' No evidence presented for this, infact earlier in the article. 'Men and women who are victims of sexual and physical violence are likely to experience chronic pain, emotional distress and numerous ailments …
/r/MensRights16/12/11 12:07 AM
1

Well I would call those a raft of changes. One day women woke up and were able have their own credit cards, one day women awoke to a day to be able to lease their own apartments etc. I'm more of a critical mass kind of theorist when it comes to great social change. Things naturally progress towards being more just when the pressure for change reaches a critical mass and change becomes inevitable. Still one step at a time certainly has some charm, buddah seemed to like it. Men are certainly convi…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 11:44 PM
1

Yes I am very upset. In my post I refer to these as 'both men and women suffer horribly due to these crimes' Yes in the end it will happen over night. In the end one day we will wake up to a fairer and more just world. Do you disagree that men make up the majority (vast majority) of those both held in prison and those raped in prison, and the majority of homeless, unsheltered homeless and those abused and raped while homeless? I've seen studies proving all these things I can hunt them down for y…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 11:17 PM
0

'One in five American women will be raped in the course of her lifetime' Article doesn't say what ratio of men will be raped. '“These forms of violence take the largest toll on women, who are more likely to report immediate impacts and long-term health problems caused by their victimization,”' No evidence presented for this, infact earlier in the article. 'Men and women who are victims of sexual and physical violence are likely to experience chronic pain, emotional distress and numerous ailments…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 11:02 PM
2

Oh the old 1 in 4 has come back, I thought this had been disproven so many times. Great journalism. 'Domestic violence is thought to account for one in five of all crimes of violence committed every year.' 'Based on the 2010/11 BCS self-completion module, seven per cent of women aged 16 to 59 were victims of domestic abuse in the past year compared with five per cent of men (Table 3.01).' 5 % matches the stat given in the article, so 7 % of women each year compare to 5% of men each year. from ht…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 04:19 PM
12

No I wouldn't say it's time for other states to adopt this practice. I'd lean more towards pennsylvania allowing expert testimony in rape cases. I don't understand why they don't allow it, does Pennsylvania not allow expert witness testimony in other criminal cases? Ah- Checked your link, I see what you are doing. Trolling MensRights to try to get some idiot to come out in support of this practice so you can pretend they are somehow a rape sympthasizer. '“The evidence of [name of victim]’s [fail…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 04:01 PM
3

'Mr. Pinker, a Harvard psychologist, is the author of a remarkable new book, The Better Angels of Our Nature, which documents the steep decline of violence through human history. His is the best account yet of what has really happened to violence against women. Like other crimes of violence, it has hit historic lows. Over the past 35 years, for example, the rate of rape in the U.S. has fallen by an astonishing 80 per cent. Rape statistics are never perfect, because many rapes aren’t reported. Bu…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 01:25 AM
3

From that article you posted. 'death occurs about once in 500,000 circumcisions, making it the safest of surgeries.' From http://www.circumstitions.com/death.html 'This study finds that approximately 117 neonatal circumcision-related deaths (9.01/100,000) occur annually in the United States, about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes. Because infant circumcision is elective, all of these deaths are avoidable. ' from http://www.circinfo.net/cancer_of_the_penis.html Penile cancer accounts …
/r/MensRights06/12/11 01:17 AM
1

Outcome too, however I do mean rights. I mean we could offer the same rights to every person on the planet but it would become ridiculous, men wouldn't need the right to breastfeed in public. Women wouldn't need the right to have their sperm frozen if about to go through testicular cancer surgery These are just two examples, men and women deserve equal status under the law and equal opportunity throughout society. No entitlements, no quotas, no affirmative action, no fixed races.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 10:38 AM
-3

No we don't and we can't ever have. Men and women have very different needs and make very different choices, we can never have equal rights. We can work towards justice, truth and equality of opportunity and status. But we will never achieve equal rights as it is simply unachievable.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 08:26 PM
2

I don't know what kind of light you would like me to shed exactly. the population of the usa is 307mill according to google population http://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/explore?ds=kf7tgg1uo9ude_&met_y=population&tdim=true&dl=en&hl=en&q=population+of+usa and 312 mill according to US census http://www.census.gov/population/www/popclockus.html so if we call it 300mill just for an easy number and then pretend women only account for 50% ( even though census data shows women being 51%) 50% of 300mill…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 08:15 PM
2

The texas model is hands down the best spousal support system I have seen to date. I live in the UK and divorce here is a messy and punishing business.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 10:32 AM
2

I didn't assume you were a feminist, simply changed mras to feminists and men and boy to women and girls. Gender reversal is admitedly not the finest source of debate, I did continue with some counter arguements... however a gentle stroll through your previous comments shows that you are at best ill informed and at worst a bigot. 'What you didn't know is that the truth is hated here, because it's basically a pit of misogynists.' - mensrights is full of misogynists 'He violated her and knew full …
/r/MensRights19/11/11 01:41 PM
3

I really can't understand why feminists aren't putting more effort into instructing women and girls to not mis representing rape. If shes drunk and consents it's not rape. If you are drunk and she gives consent it's not rape. If she seems unsure and consents it's not rape. If you don't know her well and she consents it's not rape. If she seems afraid/confused and consents it's not rape. There is no possible, reasonable way to give 100% clear consent, from a man or a women. If consent is given th…
/r/MensRights19/11/11 01:28 PM
1

There are no stats on either. This article is not real but was a troll linking to a bruce Springsteen article. Not a scientific journal.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 11:01 AM
1

Also this isn't true, follow the links and you'll find that this is simply a troll linking to a bruce springsteen article. Not the Dr. Herschel Liebowitz scienctific journal article.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter