TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ulpisen Archive

View 0 posts and 158 comments by ulpisen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

a rise of news stories about something is not the same as a rise in incidents, don't be manipulated by the media
/r/MensRights04/05/24 01:23 PM
0

both are, obviously
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:02 PM
-1

how so being exactly how i just said it, what more do you want? I'd be happy if you could prove them wrong, I just go based on what science says
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:20 PM
-2

Tomatoes are biologically berries as well, but they don’t go in a fruit salad so you're saying you can't just look at their genes to determine where they belong? The “studies” you talk about are more like saying tomatoes are actually vegetables, because you want to use them that way, then the reality how so?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:14 PM
-5

regardless if you think people identify as trans because of mental illness, just trying to get attention or if they have a birth defect where they are born with a brain that doesn't match the gender associated with their genitals, those are all caused by biological factors anthropology is biology
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:22 AM
-8

Social constructs absolutely exist And psychology is medicine Whether or not gender is separate from biology is an interesting question, you can look at how the brain is made up to see differences in Trans men and cis women, so neurologically speaking there is a biological component to it
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:43 AM
-7

Well given that botanically speaking bananas are berries, if science showed that oranges were a type of apple, I think most people would accept it Also your grammar and spelling still has a lot of mistakes
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:39 AM
-2

I don't see how your comment disagrees with the one you're replying to, just because people are talking about their issues doesn't mean they aren't facing the issues
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:36 AM
1

Someone would call the cops immediately. is this true? maybe it depends on where you live, I've used the women's restroom in a pinch
/r/MensRights22/03/23 04:20 PM
2

how about we don't assume he's telling the truth until we see the evidence? this is the same bullshit as when people get canceled based on allegations that have literally 0 evidence backing them
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:23 PM
3

prejudiced people using crime statistics to justify their prejudice also water is wet
/r/MensRights16/01/23 10:11 AM
1

Therapy being a good option doesn't mean you are "to blame" Your feelings are valid.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 01:50 AM
1

Imo both are wrong her, male privilege is a thing just like female privilege, Being a part of groups absolutely come with various advantages and disadvantages, you could reasonably refer to those advantages as privileges Saying "you're privileged because you're a man" is pretty dumb tho
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:49 PM
14

it's concerning to me that they are mixing real concerns with non issues and misinformation like, medications not being tested for women enough can be a real problem, while the point about the office temp surely would be better solved with women putting on more clothes than to raise the office temp and having men sweat in their mandatory suits? you can always put on more clothes but you can only strip so far
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:29 PM
0

I might well have a few posts where I've done that, but I'm not gonna go through my whole comment history looking for them, sorry
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:07 AM
-4

if you think women generalizing about men is bad, then you shouldn't do the same I agree that people should be called out for unfair generalizations about men, but I think the same should happen for the inverse
/r/MensRights08/09/22 11:24 AM
1

#NotAllWomen
/r/MensRights08/09/22 11:22 AM
7

to be fair you could remove basically any body part in order to not get infections in that body part you could remove toes and then you won't get ingrown toenails
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:09 AM
2

the last couple of seasons of DR. Who are awful, but I don't think the gender of the main character is a key factor in that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 10:28 AM
2

maybe the problem is that some people grow into the mindset of "I need to be a good woman/man", we should instead try to encourage people to maintain the mindset the kids have of "I need to be a good person"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 07:46 PM
-6

That's dumb, kids have role models who are animated animals and aliens and all sorts of creatures, there's absolutely no reason you can't have a role model of a different race and gender
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 06:39 PM
6

That's a different thing though, almost no one is assaulted outside at night by a stranger, most assaults are by people you know, which is another way peoples fears do not correlate with risk
/r/MensRights30/10/20 07:12 PM
9

I agree that the odds of any given man at a workplace to be falsely accused is relatively low, but does that necessarily invalidate their feelings? Or to put it a different way, would you say a woman walking home alone at night, who is more afraid of getting sexually assaulted than being run over by a car, is a moron?
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:26 PM
10

that implies that no one has ever been accused of sexual harassment without having committed it, either by mistake or deliberately that's obviously false
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:02 PM
8

couldn't you alleviate pretty much all the risk of a digital meeting by recording the whole thing?
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:01 PM
1

In my case it ended up being clearly miscommunication Although I don't doubt some people do it deliberately
/r/MensRights22/09/20 02:05 PM
6

It's really unfortunate that the two get conflated, as they are very different things, and both are important Obviously not paying attention when your partner talks to you is a problem And if your partner constantly tells you to do stuff and you don't, there's probably a problem too, either they are asking for unreasonable things, or you're not being cooperative, either of which should probably be identified and addressed
/r/MensRights22/09/20 01:46 AM
17

I got into an argument with my girlfriend about this, basically she said "you never listen to me" and I said, "I do, I just don't obey you, don't order me around" She's my ex now, but that's unrelated At least I think that's unrelated...
/r/MensRights22/09/20 12:39 AM
1

Here's the whole sketch, https://youtu.be/aBNzYpCBnfg
/r/MensRights01/03/20 12:36 PM
1

It's a quote from a wkuk sketch
/r/MensRights01/03/20 01:04 AM
2

It's a reference to a wkuk sketch, i don't know if the downvotes are from people who don't get the joke or people who find it in poor taste, no judgment either way
/r/MensRights29/02/20 07:32 PM
-7

You can't get cancer in your beast, there's no bone there
/r/MensRights29/02/20 11:34 AM
1

regardless, it's good advice
/r/MensRights12/01/20 10:00 PM
7

Nah, they are just giving good advice, the sign says what will happen, not what should happen
/r/MensRights12/01/20 04:50 PM
3

I don't think anyone is arguing that it shouldn't be illegal. It's already illegal to give people medication without consent unless you're their doctor and it's an emergency So he should be charged with that and not murder
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:24 PM
1

Regardless of how many rights you believe the fetus should have, you should recognize that it's a further crime to make someone take any medication against their will
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:23 PM
37

actual rape culture
/r/MensRights12/09/19 02:03 PM
3

"muslims should not be hired to do childcare as they may be rapists"
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:47 AM
7

Depends on where you live
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:06 AM
12

plenty of women who got cut are happy with it aswell. it's great that you're happy with it, though, since you can't do anything about it, you're one of the lucky ones
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:55 AM
0

as much as it's a serious issue, this point has been made much better before, this is just a strawman version of an actual important argument
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:49 AM
7

sure, but being a coal miner pays well, and someone has to do the dangerous jobs too
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:43 AM
16

so the reason coal miners are dying faster than kindergarden teachers is that the coal miners are too incompetent to stay alive?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:31 AM
0

it's tricky, because it's such a politically and emotionally loaded topic, but in theory "victims" could really be shorthand for "supposed victims", with the "supposed" being implied. but with all the politics and drama, I wouldn't know, it's really hard to tell if one's being too cynical anymore
/r/MensRights12/11/18 01:28 PM
1

generally I don't like this way of thinking, but she won't even confess to it, fuck that piece of shit
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:04 PM
5

I'd rather be stabbed with a dick than with a knife tbh
/r/MensRights02/06/18 01:01 AM
3

I'm sure this looks really good for them if someone claims they bought stolen goods
/r/MensRights23/05/18 10:56 PM
1

incident
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:04 PM
132

OP might have more context into who the person in the picture is
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:20 PM
2

women, probably, simply due to prevalence
/r/MensRights25/03/18 06:24 AM
3

hey! got any grapes?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:01 PM
1

we don't know whether or not it's justified in this case, so that's probably a good reason why this sort of post doesn't lead to any useful discussion. worth considering, though, is that in many of these countries women will get stuff like this despite being at a lower risk for assault overall, but at a higher risk for sexual assault.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:40 PM
6

I'd agree that it's very similar to any other needless amputation, that doesn't make it morally justified though
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:45 AM
2

both Louis and Spacey admitted, in their own ways, so I guess we could just wait and see if there'll be a confession by Takei
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:09 PM
2

You also have a political party that tried to pass a law requiring men to pee sitting down. I'll take the boring clothes thank you. it's not like something like that could ever pass, the people who proposed that were fully aware of how ridiculous it is, it's basically a publicity stunt
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:17 AM
8

maybe a better analogy would be to cut of fingertips to prevent ingrown nails? anyways, my point was that some deaf people consider being deaf preferable to being hearing, the downside of not being able to receive audio is something they consider trivial in comparison, same as some circumcised people consider the sensitivity loss, etc. to be trivial in comparison to perceived benefits
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:28 AM
10

plenty of deaf people are happy to be deaf, does that mean it's okay for them to operate on children to make them deaf?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:17 AM
3

I think prison rape is probably one of the best examples of rape culture, it's scary how many people consider it "part of the punishment"
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:03 PM
1

no, the picture is simply a psa about how you can get charged with rape if you have sex with drunk women, it says nothing about the morality or women's choices, if anything this is a useful message to get out
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:31 PM
23

or when it's done to infants who are too young to remember?
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:29 PM
39

well, not without consent or medical necessity
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:26 PM
1

but I might not use more of it, some people who are like me use more, and I might be more likely to use more, but you can't say I use more so it's not necessarily moral to charge me more, based on stereotypes and statistics
/r/MensRights26/01/17 04:50 PM
17

you can't blame the insurance industry. sure you can! there are laws against discrimination in other situations against certain groups, it's not crazy to argue that you think this group in this situation should be one of them
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:44 AM
7

she may or may not be a pedophile, she is however a child molester
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:08 PM
15

regardless of how many men are gross in india, it's kind of messed up to use segregation as the solution, they should be targetting sexual predators specifically, rather than just removing all men as a groups. imagine if you went to a concert and some people had to go to the "black" section because pickpocketing is a problem, not something you'd expect to see now a days
/r/MensRights17/01/17 02:38 AM
1

the plane mostly flies itself nowadays edit: I was just making a silly comment about airplane automation, I didn'tknow this was controversial
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:38 PM
16

"western society being run by infidels doesn't give you the right to blow yourself up in a crowd - don't be that muslim"
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:57 PM
2

I guess I don't have to concede any points I don't agree with, but I feel like that would only sidetrack from the bigger issue that I was bringing up that the main form of privilege that excists in society is class privilege, and yet it's not even close to the one most talked about
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:42 PM
7

makes sense! I see a lot of talk about white privilege and male privilege on the internet, while it seems to me a much bigger issue is class privilege. unless I'm completely wrong on that it seems like maybe there would be less dissent if there was more focus on that
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:06 PM
4

Sure, but not having class privilege doesn't mean don't still have white privilege, right?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 09:54 PM
4

actually, that would make much more sense, because you're legally and socially tied to your cousin way closer than "we have matching genetalia"
/r/MensRights30/10/16 09:28 PM
60

well, if we look past the meme I think it's adressing a real point, if you're part of a "group" that has some individuals that are in the highest points of power in society and a lot of other individuals in your "group" are in positions of little to no power, much less than the avarage person, you're still considered to be privileged because you're a part of the same "group" as the people who have power.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:12 PM
10

if the numbers say 40-70% and you say up to 70%, people will take you less seriously because it's clear you're pushing an agenda, have you never seen self proclaimed feminists try to bend the number to fit their narrative?
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:46 AM
12

are you sure? it could be a result of how society views women, how many times have you been told to not hit girls?
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:34 PM
15

lucky for them that women are less likely to be the victims of violence, so, hopefully they manage to do their job anyways
/r/MensRights29/09/16 04:24 PM
3

Well, ideally, but from what I hear you shouldn't get one if you're set on fatherimg children later, although I guess you could freeze sperm as a safeguard
/r/MensRights01/09/16 11:59 PM
7

you must have missed the memo, men aren't humans
/r/MensRights03/08/16 11:15 PM
2

jesus, you should x-post this to /r/rage
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:49 PM
1

makes sense, having sex with an adult who is totally willing but slightly too drunk to legally consent is different to a 15 year old having sex with a 14 year old which in turn is different from forcing a child to have sex with you at gunpoint. it's totally crazy to say that all rape is equally bad. even though, obviously, all rape is bad
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:07 PM
2

good luck convincing these sexists of that
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:13 PM
8

Problem is that in a huge amount if cases the test will show the accused's semen in the accuser, but that's only relevant evidence if anyone is claiming there was no sexual contact, if someone claims there was consensual sex the kits prove nothing and would waste resources. Obviously no one here condones rape, but the fact of the matter is that it's extraordinarily hard to prove wether Or not there was consent after the fact.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 01:58 AM
6

okay, so from a philosophical perspective, the whole "women are afraid to walk home at night"/"women are told to be afraid walking home at night" are an interesting problem. considering that in general the risk of being attacked is rather small, it seems that the actual solution to this problem would be to convince women that they are reasonably safe. if you for example take the hypothetical scenario of a person being afraid of being attacked by a bear walking home (living in a pretty rural area…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:22 PM
1

evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that it's a false accusation
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:18 PM
1

that's quite interesting, I was thinking mostly hollywood, although personally I don't really see the big deal
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:49 PM
1

litterally the only thing on this list that is a womens only issue is under representation in media, and it seems really manipulative for them to imply that this all affects only women
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:20 AM
14

well, if you're using the traditional definition of feminism, which basically means "someone who is against sexism" this is pretty true, you categorically are either a feminist or a sexist. ironically a lot of self proclaimed "feminists" would not fall under that definition and instead be sexists, reading the context of this quote I think this is what she's getting at
/r/MensRights09/04/16 01:19 PM
0

False rape claims are the #1 thing holding back justice for rape victims. I disagree, even if the false rape claims were 1 / 100 000 000 it would still be immoral to convict people without sufficient evidence, and by the nature of the crime it will always be difficult to get evidence in most cases
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:45 PM
14

part of the problem is that the people who are most likely to get raped are young, non violent first time offenders. ie. 20ish drug dealers
/r/MensRights04/04/16 02:07 PM
2

I mean, at least technically, it is possible, that should be obvious, two people shoving a dildo up eachothers asses at the same time, each against the others will would be mutual rape. the question becomes a lot more abstract and philosophical if we're talking about mutual statutory rape
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:23 AM
2

This just is simply impossible. I mean, it's not actually impossible, it's just a stupid way to have a law
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:07 PM
1

that's interesting!, I never knew people had that problem, but I guess it makes sense. that's too bad
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:58 PM
1

that's interesting! I've never heard that before, what country do you live in?
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:00 PM
1

I agree, but that's not a solution, that's just another problem, I mean, it's not like I have a solution either, as long there are people who get pregnant, refuse to abort and don't have the means to raise the child, this is a problem we can't get away from, I agree that adoption is probably better than forcing someone who is not at all interested in being a parent to be a parent better, but not by that much
/r/MensRights12/03/16 11:48 PM
0

that's not an argument, just because what you're describing is bad, doesn't mean we should encourage people to dump kids into an already overloaded adoption system
/r/MensRights12/03/16 11:08 PM
-1

Make sure you are both in agreement about what to do in that case, before you have sex. that's obviously ideal, but sadly that's not realistic, and I don't think there's a good solution, this isn't really a problem with the whole financial abortion propsition, it's a problem with some people seeing abortion as a given right and some as actual murder, it's basically impossible to reconcilliate those views, I do think it makes more sense for the "pro life" people to identify themselves though, as …
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:58 PM
0

It has to be when he's notified. If it's too late, she can always adopt the kid out. But he'll still have his out, too. I'm not sure that's a good solution, some people have moral issues with adoption, for good reason
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:55 PM
2

That's true, but even in perfect use condoms have a 2% annual failure rate. That sucks generally, but really sucks when considered over a, say, 10 or 15 year period. I mean, that's an avarage of one baby per 50 years, those are pretty good odds
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:51 PM
3

you can also get a vasectomy, it's not ideal but it's worth mentioning
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:50 PM
1

I mean, there's a lot of different things that fall under the umbrella of "anime" it's generalized extremely hard an is in actuality as varied a medium as any other
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:57 PM
9

Does anyone here have scientific evidence against the above argument? not a scientific argument but a philosophical one. if you put drugs (including alcohol) into your own body, you are responsible for what (or who) you do while under the influence. also, even if there were different levels of alcohol that would be needed to be consumed in order to no longer be responsible for their actions, that doesn't really change the hipocracy, considering how rare it is for women to be tried for rape for h…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:06 PM
5

as someone who enjoys anime, there's an absolute ton of badass female characters in that. Nico Robin, Mikasa Ackermann, all the characters from Madoka, but most of all Homura, Akane Tsunemori, Rei Ayanami, Kurisu Makise, Yuno Gasai, Rika Furude. but generally anime is seen as something "for boys"
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:22 PM
1

well with that there's the problem of something that you're 100% sure of but not at all provable, can't really write that into law, but I sympathise with you
/r/MensRights06/03/16 12:28 PM
3

source? I don't see how you can measure a soul
/r/MensRights05/03/16 10:08 PM
2

well, that's definitely more a question for philosophy than biology.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:33 PM
1

well, that's an interesting discussion, the problem is distinguishing between an actual human and a potential human, obviously it's not murder to jack off and not impregnate someone, but on the other hand it's not okay to murder babies, so somewhere there's a line to be drawn, in the end it's both a matter of philosophy and biology
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:05 PM
11

so, the discussion is basically this, if we permit people whoose sperm end up making babies not to take care of the babies, the downside is that there's a risk that the baby will be poorly taken care of. while I agree with this in spirit, I don't see how that's any different than banning poor people or disabled people from having children. it's odd that if a woman decides to intentionally keep a fetus that she can't take care of, it's the job of the person who accidentally made her pregnant to t…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:31 PM
2

circlejerking aside this is an interesting issue, I'm sure most people would agree this is a step in the wrong direction, although it might at least be more consistent than current laws. I'm sure most people would agree that morally there's not much difference between giving blowjobs for cash or giving blowjobs for food
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:13 PM
4

also remember that correlation doesn't mean causation
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:24 AM
1

that's fair, things work differently where I live, most bathrooms are gender neutral, and some places have a gender neutral one and a urinal bathroom. I assume you're from the US?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:51 PM
0

that's true, but in that situation it might not be cost effective to have two changing stations, one possible solution is to have two gender neutral bathrooms or make an exception for men who need to use a changing station located in the women's room. one solution would be to have only a male bathroom and a gender neutral one, as there'd be a urinal in the male one but anyone should be able to use the other one. I don't think this is a good solution, because people would surely complain that the…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:01 PM
4

I think a better solution is to have a changing station in a gender neutral bathroom, unless it's a big business it's probably not worthwile to have more than one changing station. in my country there's often changing stations in handicap bathrooms
/r/MensRights11/02/16 03:41 PM
2

have you confronted him about it? while it does seem like he's being abused it might be a mutual thing. either way you might want to recommend couple's counceling.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:06 PM
5

to be fair, it's technically correct, there would be no need to advocate for gender equality if there was only one gender
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:56 PM
2

I never mentioned that, I was just criticizing you for saying "Why would they ally with someone that believes they are mentally damaged?" as I thought that was unfair towards mentally challanged people
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:53 PM
2

eh, I guess? I don't think that homosexuals have any innate mental issues, I don't know if you misunderstood my comment, but I was just saying that it's bigoted to not accept someone as your ally just based on percieved mental damage
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:45 PM
1

Why would they ally with someone that believes they are mentally damaged? why not? it's not like mentally damaged people don't deserve to be treated as people
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:28 PM
2

great idea! fuck making panels based on merit, let's go by genetalia instead
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:43 AM
1

what's RoK's justification for boycotting?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:41 AM
1

"thief: a person, typically an immigrant, who commits theft" is this really how we should be doing definitions?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 03:43 PM
2

I disagree, in the case of burglary there are tons of ways to get caught, someone could witness it, you could get caught on tape, you could leave fingerprints or DNA evidence, you could be caught red handed by someone living there, you could get caught by someone recognizing stolen goods or tracking it. the only way to really distinguish consensual sex from rape is with a recording of some kind, and even then it's not even always clear cut. in addition to this it's often illegal to record someon…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:38 AM
2

False equivalence. everything except this I agree with, I'm just saying that the reality of how hard it is to find evidence of rape is a shitty situation for everyone
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:37 AM
21

I mean, it can be, let's say you either had to let someone have sex with you when you're passed out, one time, or you go to prison for 10 years for a crime you didn't commit and you'll always be known as a rapist. I'm not saying it is worse, I'm just saying it can be
/r/MensRights03/01/16 08:39 PM
11

not all the examples in the list were from the us. part of the problem is that there's a lot of rape cases that get dismissed due to lack of evidence, feminists have a tendancy to count all those cases as rape and MRAs have a tendancy to count them as false accusations, there's no way to ever know for sure
/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:10 PM
22

rape being hard to find evidence for really is a shitty situation for everyone involved, ofcourse someone being raped but there not being enough evidence for a conviction must be horrible, but being accused when you haven't done it must be equally horrible. In todays climate where the mob mentality is to lynch without evidence it's possibly more horrible to be falsely accused than to be raped and have the rapist get away with it
/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:08 PM
9

why should the advertizing industry be such a big factor in crime classification?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 05:11 PM
6

while I do agree with you, should the same standards apply to someone who touches a strangers foot or elbow for sexual reasons?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 03:39 PM
1

to me it seems like a feminist simply means "a person who assumes women are discriminated against is trying to either combat this discrimination or give women some kind of compensation for this" I think that's a reasonable way to define it.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:08 AM
2

right and for male circumcision "The penis is still in tact but other parts of the genitalia would not be. The penis alone is not the only part of the male genitalia involved in men's sexual pleasure."
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:29 PM
6

tfw diversity means only one group of people is allowed
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:52 AM
1

well a good start might be to not perform unnecessary surgery on them, it's not like there's NO way to know which things are more or less likely to have a negative effect
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:19 PM
2

almost nobody
/r/MensRights30/08/15 03:40 PM
1

this is probably part of the reason it get's googled more than patriarchy
/r/MensRights27/06/15 07:25 AM
2

it's possible that there's a two sided misunderstanding where no one is lying, she felt like she couldn't say no, but she could have said no. he felt like she was into the sex, but she wasn't into the sex. I'm not american so I don't know if that is rape legally, but that's not rape morally.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:58 PM
1

Or, perhaps, funny is somewhat subjective. what the fuck?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:50 PM
2

my personal code says that every joke should be more funny than offensive, I feel like this joke is not sufficiently funny.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:27 PM
2

you must not have heard about vocal rape /s
/r/MensRights15/12/14 10:30 PM
9

this comic is from lawcomic.net and is clearly speaking about rape legally, not ethicly.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:13 PM
1

from a philosophical point of view there's some interesting gray areas, for example, if two people are too drunk to consent to sex, should they both go to prison for rape? and there's obviously such a thing as heavily implying violence to coerce someone into "consenting" to sex, waving a gun around and whatever, but legally it can get pretty hazy if someone says that they were absolutely sure that they'd get murdered if they didn't agree to sex and the other party is seemingly oblivious to havin…
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:12 PM
3

in this example, yes, but not all examples, in my comment I specifically mentioned children. so the argument you might be looking for is "the underage person in this article is not a child" but I was just referring to female teacher statutory rape in general
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:06 PM
3

I just meant in general, also, I live in sweden, where the age of consent is 15, and it's still illegal for a teacher to sleep with a 16 year old student of theirs.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 04:37 PM
6

I didn't mean it as a metaphor, I literally mean that getting your kid circumcised without his consent is a shitty thing to do, and while they most likely have done enough good in his life to compensate, it's not necessarily a fair assumption.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 04:36 PM
6

I'm gonna go ahead and play devil's advocate here. 1.you don't know what his parents did for him, you can't possibly say he loved his parents during his childhood, for all you know they were abusive or gave him up for adoption after circumcising him. all you do know is that he got raised into being the kind of person who resents his parents for his circumcision.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 03:59 PM
11

maybe teachers who have sex with children are not looking for sex with people their own age because they are pedophiles?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:31 AM
1

keep in mind, that this only works if you are already at the conclusion that it's not immoral to abort a fetus
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:43 PM
4

we need to make one of those cups that changes the design when you put a warm liquid in it
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:01 PM
1

regardless of whether or not it's justified it's definitely questionable and since we complain about people being banned from feminist subreddits for stupid reasons we should obviously hold our own mods to a higher standard
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:16 PM
1

it's all about context, I'm a man, but if someone touched my chest in a very sexualized way, I'd concider that sexual harassment, just like I'd argue that if you smack a woman's butt in the locker room in a non sexual way, it should not be concidered sexual harassment
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:59 AM
2

well, they get money for appearing on the show, and the ammount she awards him on the show comes out of the ammount she's given, so it's better than nothing, I guess
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:57 AM
1

I think that equality between the genders is thinking too small, I'd like to see myself as an activist between all humans, all subgroups of humans and all individuals.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:07 AM
9

I guess it's worse to have fingertips, since they get way dirtier than a penis does.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:11 AM
18

I have to clean under my fingernails, that doesn't mean I'd want my finger tips cut off.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:52 AM
6

it's a pretty stupid argument to say that this newspaper shouldn't print this story because it's not the norm. isn't that the whole point of news? to tell you when something happens that's not exactly what always/usually happens. and from the article it seems like there's no arguing that this girl wasn't lying anyways...
/r/MensRights05/03/14 11:51 PM
3

that's not how I consume food
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:52 AM
6

I'd say that we should broaden the subject even further, let's not just ban all genital mutilation of babies, let's ban all unneccessary mutilation of babies, genital or otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 03:31 PM
1

very, very nice.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:37 AM
4

it usually isn't legal to mutilate someone without concent
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:25 AM
6

in some countries it's mandatory to go to war, in the USA it's a choice, and if you choose to join the army, get sent away to kill people, then that's your choice. I'm not saying weather or not this or any other war is good or bad, but you certainly are responsible for your own actions, no one is holding a gun to your head
/r/MensRights17/06/12 09:36 PM
10

just because slicing of a piece of the child's penis is a cultural norm doesn't mean one shouldn't get emotional about it. cutting off any bodypart of any human being who is innocent against their will is always a horrible crime
/r/MensRights06/06/12 01:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter