TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ulthrant82 Archive

View 1 posts and 384 comments by ulthrant82 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

ulthrant82/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:11 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
33

Tell me you didn't read up on the case without telling me you didn't read up on the case.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 04:40 PM
20

Your comment needs to be top. She can complain all she wants; but overall, who do you think handles your garbage? Who maintains the electrical grid, the sewage system, and the telecommunications infrastructure? Who produces gasoline and delivers it to your local station? Who keeps the roads in order? Who is responsible for the vast majority of the food that is grown, and who is largely responsible for processing that food and delivering it to you?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 03:10 AM
39

Men don't have enough close friends male-only spaces.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 04:00 AM
28

What is a disorder, other than a simply a behavior that society has deemed unacceptable?
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:56 PM
2

Yeah, I don't know. This is my experience, and it was a positive one. I'm not saying all are and I'm not suggesting anyone should get one, least of all if they expect a reversal or are unsure of their situation. When I first requested the procedure I actually had to sit down with the doctor and have an interview as to why I wanted it. This to me was a permanent decision we made once we decided we did not want any more children. I was in and out of the operating room in under 20 minutes, experien…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 04:11 PM
-6

I've had a vasectomy; one of our best decisions. I have two kids and a very loving wife. I get that there are risks, as all surgeries do, but the vast majority of vasectomies are without complication.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 03:49 AM
15

I'd torrent that.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/22 04:38 AM
53

I'm surprised no one has brought this up yet.. on Reddit no less...
/r/MensRights05/01/22 05:49 AM
6

Exactly what I was thinking. If I try to sit in my wife's car without moving the seat back I will get stuck. She is SO CLOSE to the stearing wheel and dash I can't see how that would not be a significant factor in injuries stats, and this is every women I have ever known.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 03:13 PM
47

Why would you want to discover people's unerlying health issues and help them improve when you can just blame then for all the world's problems?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:50 PM
50

They even got paid more in a per game basis. The men were on a pay to play contract. The women's contract is superior in nearly every single respect -except- per game win bonuses. So they sued to get that too. They argued that they did not want to give up any of the additional benefits they received, they only wanted to get the same bonus structure the men get plus the higher per game pay and health benefits. The men's team basically makes nothing unless they play and win. They can afford to do …
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/21 02:12 PM
2

Nothing you've stated in any way backs up your claim that they are not addictive. The scientifically backed websites I've listed however, do. Your claim that they aren't addictive because you aren't addicted is a massive false equivalency and works just as well on things like drugs, alcohol and caffeine. But if proving strangers wrong on the internet makes you a dick.. 🤷🏼‍♂️
/r/seduction19/05/21 12:46 AM
1

https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/eating-disorders/binge-eating-disorder/mental-health-food-addiction https://psychcentral.com/lib/symptoms-of-sexual-addiction https://www.healthline.com/health/exercise-addiction Not sure you even understand what an addiction is.
/r/seduction18/05/21 10:51 PM
8

Sex is addictive. Exercise is addictive. Food is addictive. Just because something is addictive, doesn't make it inherently bad.
/r/seduction17/05/21 11:53 AM
22

I'm an Industrial Millwright. In decades in industry I have men two female millwrights and a handful of female welders and adozen or so electricians. Now, I currently work in heavy industry. I work away from home in remote locals in extreme weather, so I get that this type of work turns away most from both genders. But I've done industrial plants in metropolitan areas too. The trades halls will accept any woman and pay their entire way through school no questions asked. Yet, nothing.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/21 06:14 PM
5

If the only thing that was holding women back from manual labor jobs was the fact that they were forbidden, and now that this has been lifted, shouldn't there be a tidal wave of women applying for manual labor jobs now?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/21 06:08 PM
31

Only in the last half century has this even been an topic. Humanity is some 5 million+ years old. Men have evolved over that time to perform the tasks that they needed to to keep the species alive. Now that we have modern civilization and women have entered the workforce we have this notion that men and woman are exactly the same.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/21 06:03 PM
10

Don't forget the garbage collectors, plumbers, carpenters, Boilermakers, pilots, equipment operators, truckers, mechanics, factory workers, miners, arborists, roofers, welders, firemen, electricians, warehouse workers, drillers, pavers and sewage treatment operators. Thinking that women will just pick up that slack is asinine. These women have no idea what it takes or how many men work tirelessly to keep their standard of living for them.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 02:41 PM
9

So? If that's what he wants who are we to judge? Better to be single pushing 50 than married and cheating pushing 50.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 03:35 AM
6

It's always the doctors, the CEOs and the engineers, but what about the warehouse workers and waste water treatment operators.. The plumbers, electricians, mechanics, truck drivers, boiler makers, city workers, sanitation workers, police, fireman, pilots...? Those are just the ones that keep the day to day from falling apart around us. There's also men in mining, oil and gas, shipping, construction, etc. All jobs that are heavily physically demanding and overwhelmingly male. I'm sure they could …
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:28 AM
1

Me too. That's why I work in a brand new copper mine and not in a 3rd world coal mine..
/r/MensRights29/01/20 05:39 AM
1

I dunno. I work in mining and I only work half the year. The work is tough and the environment is harsh but I love the job and they pay really really well.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 04:56 AM
1

I fall under 3 of those catagories and make 6 figures..
/r/MensRights27/01/20 05:19 AM
10

If you look at wage earned vs. Purchasing power it absolutely is.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/19 03:13 PM
22

I prefer holding doors for everyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/19 01:52 PM
1

Whether you like it or not, you're paying taxes to support those bottom 50%. 82 federal programs and assorted tax expenditures totalled $742 billion in the US in 2013. All of these programs require massively wasteful bureaucracies to support them further running up the costs that would otherwise be eliminated by a UBI system. This doesn't even factor the benefit of creating such a dependable safety net for everyone.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:35 PM
1

So if you work and get paid for it how is that unfair?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:55 PM
1

So If we both recieved a cheque for exactly $1000 once a month how many months would it take for me to receive more than you?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 07:16 PM
2

Most common way I've heard people downplay UBI is to claim it as "everyone gets free money." That's about as accurate as saying "everyone gets free roads." Sure, if you ride a bike everywhere you'll enjoy the benefit of a city street without paying to maintain it, but it's not free. A combination of property taxes, corporate taxes, gas taxes, etc. Pay for those roads and help maintain a public service much the same way as a UBI would work. But no one seems to think roads are costless or cheap. Y…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:22 PM
3

If everyone gets the same amount, how do they eat up an unfair share?
/r/MensRights03/09/19 11:57 PM
2

But it happens. Should the barber shops all close down? https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/canada/i-don-t-feel-comfortable-barber-defends-refusing-haircut-to-woman-1.4028473 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5619979/Barber-sued-mum-refusing-cut-daughters-hair-asks-public-money-cover-legal-fees.html
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/19 04:34 AM
7

Counterpoint: Why did Jon Stewart (a television comedian) HAVE to testify for 9/11 first responders in Congress 18 YEARS after the attacks? Why does anyone?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:00 AM
7

There are 306,600 hours in 35 years. She flew 100 hours a year. Or 15 minutes a day. If she flew 8 hours a day, she would reach her 100 hours per year in 2 1/2 business weeks.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 02:09 PM
224

They (apparently) make 35% and yet spend 70 to 80%. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bridgetbrennan/2015/01/21/top-10-things-everyone-should-know-about-women-consumers/#405326b56a8b
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/19 02:33 AM
4

Which is an interesting conclusion. Why is it racing has no women? Is there something about racing that men have an edge at? Sports like football, baseball, hockey, etc. These make sense. Men have a distinct advantage. Does auto racing have something similar or is it something else?
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:36 PM
14

I met a couple. This reads quite strangely if you misinterpret. Edit: formatting is hard.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:15 AM
11

My profession is 98% male. I'd say that's underrepresented by women. Where are all the SJWs decrying the lack of women in the Industrial Millwright profession?
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:11 AM
21

If being a secretary paid as well as a lineman, sign me up.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/19 04:46 AM
98

More importantly it discourages others from having the same ideas.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/18 10:01 PM
2

Nope.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:44 PM
2

Many social programs aren't only beneficial to the recipient. It's considerably cheaper to fund a preventive measure than a cure.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:01 PM
0

"Have you ever had sugar, or PCP?"
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:45 AM
40

You've pretty much refuted every Carrie Underwood song.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:08 PM
7

Or not play. If the best men in the industry all refused to work for a company that actively acts sexist against them, you'd see a tune or two change pretty quick.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:55 PM
3

But did we start the fire?
/r/MensRights17/03/18 02:43 AM
1

It must be really stressful for those in Hollywood who negotiate salaries for actors nowadays.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:16 PM
11

This example is of a girl taking hormones to become a guy, so there no "men and ex-men" in this story.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:25 PM
28

I couldn't make it past.. they’ll say “sexual harassment isn’t as bad as rape." it fucking isn't.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:55 PM
23

Ah, the ol' then vs. than difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/18 03:02 AM
1

People IN them were made accountable to their own decisions/actions. This is the imaginary scenario I'm refering to.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:32 PM
2

I'm sure if this imaginary scenario were to be implemented we could come up with an effective system. In saying that you're not wrong. If companies were effectively punished for their misdeeds they wouldn't behave the same, for sure.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:01 PM
2

I'd be totally ok with corporations staying exactly the way they are as long as the people IN them were made accountable to their own decisions/actions.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:43 PM
1

https://www.amazon.com/Subtle-Art-Not-Giving-Counterintuitive/dp/0062457713
/r/seduction18/01/18 04:30 PM
7

What about half of everything generated since he left his job, and no alimony? Would that be considered fair to you?
/r/MensRights03/11/17 05:35 PM
12

And coming from a woman who is literally protected by the men of the secret service 24/7.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:50 PM
10

He's saying the added heath coverage is an additional $20 a month, not the birth control.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 02:15 PM
2

It's funny how people will claim owning and using a gun as some kind of divine right. You need a license to drive a car, and if a blind person went into the DMV to get a license he would be turned away. Not only that, the majority of people would see no issue with this. In fact they would be outraged if he was given one. Why would it be any different with a gun?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:09 AM
4

I'm having trouble remembering the last time someone killed 50 people and injured 500 others with a knife. I'm not saying violence isn't an issue. I'm not saying mental health isn't an issue. What I am saying, is maybe people with serious mental issues owning guns with no oversight is an issue.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:22 AM
2

I'm also from Canada and I had to take a course, pass a test, and then send in an application to get a Restricted firearms license in order to be legally allowed to own my AR. As for mental health in Canada, "the majority of mental health services do not meet the eligibility requirement of “medically necessary.”
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:02 AM
2

Why not both?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:35 AM
11

Question... how can men be outnumbered 6 to 1 while simultaneously account for 44% of the population? If you're outnumbered 6 to 1 you account for less than 15%.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:49 AM
6

I was close friends with a girl for almost 10 years. We now have 2 kids, a house, 2 cars and a dog.
/r/seduction30/09/17 02:09 AM
12

Funny, I do a one of those jobs and I'd also prefer it if she found me virtually invisible.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:15 PM
2

Couldn't be found on the Titanic either.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 01:59 AM
6

Can we keep the first one?
/r/MensRights10/09/17 01:57 AM
2

...that sounds like a statement that should be followed by a story.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:40 PM
1

They think they can get away with it everywhere, because men don't typically react over such things. Much like ladies only nights at a fitness facility. Men don't normally make an issue of it. We either don't go at those times or stop going there entirely since we are more typically prone to problem solving, and those are the simplest methods to solve the problem. In these cases someone saw the problem differently. He saw the sexism inherent and decided to act. Sexism is sexism and you can eithe…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:10 AM
2

No one was denied. Women just got in for free.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:21 AM
5

It's not Chivalry, it's capitalism. You make your least popular night a 'ladies night' to encourage a higher female turnout, because if you ensure a higher female turnout you also ensure a higher male turnout. It may be illegal, but it works.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:18 AM
30

"I'm not sexist, but..."
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/17 06:59 PM
9

The numbers are true, it's their definition of sexual assault that's the lie. In one study I read they defined "cat calling" as sexual assault. You can get some pretty big numbers when you ask the right questions.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 11:19 PM
556

He was fired over this. Curious where the denial is?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/17 05:02 PM
32

So the defense, meaning the woman's lawyer, alleged that there was evidence that they had no evidence of.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/17 02:24 AM
12

"Premjee, who had maintained his innocence since being accused, said the woman, who has not been named..." Oh ffs...
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/17 04:07 PM
26

Yeah.. A 2000lbs. prey animal.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 02:51 AM
1

https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder987/56836987.jpg
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:37 PM
2

We had a notarized letter made for my girlfriend when she went into the States with our daughter stating she had my permission. Not sure if it was necessary, but it felt like a smart precaution.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 12:21 AM
6

Don't start nothin', wont be nothin'.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:16 AM
17

You -should- listen and believe... and then question and verify.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:01 PM
115

She was taught to.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:59 PM
1

He means dirty like mining, etc.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:49 PM
3

Imagine the shitstorm from having different prices for each race...
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:58 PM
127

It's also illegal.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:40 AM
44

If we pay for birth control and abortions, there will be less kids raised by these people. I'm ok with this.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/17 12:22 AM
3

"The fact that it holds back more boys than girls is irrelevant though. I'm a guy, and I excelled under the current school system." To be fair, just because you succeeded, doesn't mean all boys should. The fact of the matter is, the school system today happens to be geared towards girls and that generally harms more boys than it helps. This isn't sexism, nor proof that boys are oppressed. Boys aren't oppressed. In fact, no one group on this entire continent is. Real oppression happens in countri…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:48 PM
6

Let's say the school imposed a rule that each morning, every child has to run a lap around a football field in under a given length of time. Let's say, 5 minutes. Now, they add this rule for the health and well being of all the kids. However, studies have clearly shown that most of the girls are unable to achieve this task in the length of time required. All the girls are failing while all the boys are excelling. Is this because the girls aren't working hard enough? Should they simply tell the g…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:57 PM
6

Your claim was that boys don't perform as well as girls in school because they don't work as hard. This is emphatically not true. I've shown that boys are failing in school because the school system is structured in such a way that benefits girls and harms boys. I didn't claim this was intentional. I don't feel the why is as important, only that it is and needs to change.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:28 PM
10

Why boys are failing in an education system stacked against them. Why schools are failing our boys. How to make school better for boys.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:38 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:37 PM
1

It's a hyperbole, not satire. But yeah, I'm the one who doesn't get it. lol
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:29 PM
1

I didn't say taking about it was damaging. I said using this method to argue was damaging. As in, to your argument. No one is going to be damaged by talking about female circumcision. However, if your goal is to end male circumcision, don't argue -for- female circumcision (seriously, ironically, sardonically, satirically or by hyperbole), because you're just going to end up with an opponent who refuses to listen and doesn't respect you or your argument. You'll be fighting a losing battle arguing…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:10 AM
10

They do. Guess which type of cancer receives the most funding?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:46 PM
1

It's not surprising someone who thinks "fuck off" is a valid tool in an argument wouldn't have any idea what I'm getting at. Also, this isn't "pointing out the discrepancy." This is the equivalent to breaking one child's toy because another's is broken in the name of fairness. Instead of, you know, fixing the damn toy.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:45 PM
1

Nice try. I didn't imply, infer, suggest or even hint at you being or claiming to be an MRA. You came up with that all on your own. This is the same tired logic feminists use to claim anyone who believes in equality is automatically a feminist. You want a label, pick one. I don't care. But I didn't put any on you, and I never said anything about the movement or its activists. I am only referring to the rights of men. I'm not sure how to make this more simple for you.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:39 AM
2

Good thing I didn't call you an MRA then, or even mention the Men's Rights Movement. You're free to believe whatever you want and feel however you choose about it. But men's rights still aren't being taken seriously due in part to people such as yourself and arguments like OPs.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:44 AM
1

Honestly? The men and women constantly talking about the injustices men and boys see on a day to day basis are doing the first step to getting things done. We have to change public opinion before we can change laws. Posters like this don't help to change public opinion.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:59 AM
2

FYI, persons such as yourself are the reason mens rights aren't being taken seriously. Also, if you call someone stupid you pretty much destroy any chance of having an intellectual conversation. Don't be so angry. Life gets better after high school.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:57 AM
1

I don't think the illustrator was making light of anything. It wasn't intended to be a literal statement, but my point is that this shouldn't be used in this setting because too much of what is being said can be taken out of context, misquoted and twisted around. To be honest I would have made my point more clear if I had known it would get so much attention.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:53 AM
1

You seem to understand perfectly what I'm getting at.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:50 AM
1

The problem with people who think that it's "angry", "woman hating" is they don't seem to be capable of much nuance in their thinking. They don't seem to understands literary devices and figures of speech unless they support their particular viewpoint.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 11:11 PM
0

You're proving my point. I never claimed anyone was being physically damaged, and yet you are using that to make an argument. If you can twist my words here, why can't the words of OP be twisted just as easily?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:09 PM
-3

It's not forcing anyone to do anything. A person can read this type of argument and choose to take it literally instead of it as it's intended hyperbole. Then what have you just accomplished? They are wrong, but so? Now they hate you. There's a lot of hate and fear pointed towards MRAs. You think this helps?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:53 PM
5

Which is exactly why they shouldn't be used.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:48 PM
10

Oh, I do really do get it. Using female circumcision in a satirical or hyperbolic way is pointless and possibly damaging. It's odd that people can't see that. You aren't winning anyone over with shock value; you just push them farther away. It doesn't matter if it's satire. You assume that because it was intended as satire and that you see it as satire, that everyone else must. But you're only fuelling their hatred and legitimizing their preconceptions, because in the end they're just going to l…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:46 PM
7

Agreed. The family courts are heavily weighted in the direction of women and this needs to change. I don't see a clear answer to this given the complexity of family court cases other than to change the laws to allow each individual case to be judged on its own merits more fairly and to not take gender into account. That will take a lot of change in the law as well as societal preconceptions and attitudes.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:38 PM
20

Feminists are people, and people are very capable of being blind to facetiousness and satire. If two people are on opposite sides of a heated argument, are either of them going to look at the other persons points with logic and fairness; look at it in it's most positive light or it's most negative? Do you think it more likely that they would look at this as hate speech? Even if they're wrong, what have you accomplished?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:13 PM
54

Who is this poster intended for? If it's exclusively for people who are already for Men's Rights, then it does it's job perfectly as satire and would be seen as such by those people. If it's intended for feminists to show them the hypocrisy of their ways, then it is pointless at best and harmful at worst. You aren't going to convince a women's rights group of the error of their ways by arguing for the removal of women's rights. What you'll probably do is strengthen their anger for the MRM. Peopl…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:02 PM
541

I understand the goal. It's still the wrong direction. It's arguing in the wrong. You aren't going to sway anyone with this type of argument. All you're going to do is have people who already agree with you, agree with you more. Circumcision is wrong for any gender, and making an argument for it even simply to point out another groups hypocrisy only fuels their beliefs against the MRM when they read that you want all of these things that are hateful to women. Truthful or no.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:52 PM
1825

We should be focusing on increasing the rights of men, not decreasing the rights of women. Most of these are going in the wrong direction. Arguing for female circumcision is wrong, arguing against male circumcision is right. Etc.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:34 PM
7

Seriously? I refuse to believe that any person who has gone through menstruation would honestly believe hormones don't effect moods. Just curious whether or not you had heard of him. It's a tragic and sad story. Something we need to remember before we decide to mess with a persons very being.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 02:45 PM
3

You'd be surprised how easy it is for a single woman to obtain a child.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 02:34 PM
2

I thought mansplaining was a man talking over a woman who already knows more about it the subject than he does. Or something bullshit like that. Could be wrong. Manspreading is my favourite. Put your purse on the floor and we'll talk.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 02:33 PM
7

Ever heard of David Reimer?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 02:29 PM
16

My daughter likes to play with trucks and dolls. Honestly, this is a non issue. Their happiness should be more of a concern then their gender role.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 02:25 PM
2

The Mall in my town does it well. There is a men's and a women's bathroom. Then there are gender neutral single stall bathrooms for everyone/wheelchair access/parent rooms.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 07:38 PM
9

Every statistic used came from either a poll or a survey. The latter was about sexual assault, not rape. Is it fair to say that using an anonymous survey to compare data to false rape allegations would not be accurate?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:32 PM
67

No one is claiming the theatre is suppressing free speech. Those that threatened the theatre are suppressing free speech. The theatre is allowing it to happen by cancelling a movie it was planning to show.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 08:12 PM
4

It's amazing to me how it -has- to be sexism that won the election for Trump. It couldn't possibly be that his opponent was being investigated by the FBI and has a long and sorted past of lies and abuses of power. I would love to see a female president, but holy shit not that one. I'm pretty sure in this day and age pretty much any other woman could have destroyed Trump in that election. They just chose the wrong one.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 06:23 PM
3

I was wondering about that. Also, how were those 3,400 companies chosen? It's easy for a study to push a narrative when you don't show how you got to that conclusion. It would be fairly easy to find 1,700 overachieving companies lead by women and 1,700 companies under performing lead by men and claim the result is due to women being better leaders. Considering how many factors are involved to make a company thrive I don't think that is the best metric to use to compare genders.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 06:18 PM
2

Let her go. She asked you for time, the mature thing to do is to give it to her. If you really love this girl and want this to work, smothering her with plans and speeches most likely will push her farther away, it won't "win" her back. Let her know how you feel and that you would like to be with her, and leave her alone to figure out if that's what she wants too.
/r/seduction26/11/16 09:10 PM
36

Trying?
/r/MensRights05/11/16 10:11 PM
1

A young flat earth creationist.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:05 AM
8

Hatshepsut was an Egyptian Pharaoh in 1500BC.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:04 AM
19

Yes. It is different. He didn't agree to be cheated on. Adopted parents agreed with full knowledge of the situation to raise a child that wasn't biologically theirs. He did not.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 12:58 AM
5

I was always taught you earned respect, it wasn't a right you can demand, and that's what I intend to teach my daughter and my son. If you want respect, be respectable.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:03 PM
1

It's hard to spot the trolls, and usually you end up feeding them for quite a while before you realize it. Which is unfortunate, because most people are legitimately looking for an adult conversation and hoping to learn a thing or two. Then there's this guy. :/
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:27 PM
2

Nice. That's quite the resume. Im a millwright at a mine where we fly in and out, so I'm away from home for half the year, two weeks at a time. I'm not going to pretend it's the same as deploying, but at the same time I get the same argument so I know how you feel. My job is extremely physically demanding in extreme weather for long stretches of time, 18 hour shifts aren't uncommon. Then I get off work and go to my 8' x 10' room and hear about how hard everything is at home.. Really? How was you…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/16 06:40 PM
2

Where are/were ya stationed?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/16 03:11 PM
12

So, are there no major cultural and structural forces impacting mens career decisions?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:00 PM
3

I guess men can't be victims of DV, just like they can't be raped. :/
/r/MensRights26/09/16 02:40 PM
22

They start out hating that men don't objectify them. That leads them to hating men objectifying (attractive) women.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 11:44 PM
13

Which is funny, because both nursing and teaching are both incredibly important and rewarding careers that deserve way more respect and admiration than they receive.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 07:23 PM
2

I hope you're right. Denial is pretty strongly linked to self-entitlement.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/16 07:20 PM
5

It just means "men going their own way." From what I understand, it's men that are fed up with societies standards and expectations for both men and women, who've decided to do things on their own. They don't by definition dislike women, they simply want to focus on themselves. I hope I'm getting that right.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 02:11 AM
85

Not treating women as special is not the same thing as hatred for women. That word gets thrown around too much.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/16 08:54 PM
13

MPs and senators to get pay hike. Found where we can get more funding!
/r/MensRights13/09/16 08:43 PM
353

He left me to go on a 6 month vacation with his buddies. Jesus..
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/16 02:52 PM
0

That's also the crappy name the lead character gave himself in Hackers.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:08 PM
23

They also don't like to cause problems. Police tend to be bad for business.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/16 11:08 PM
3

Every time an article about Lena Dunham comes up it makes me unhappy. So I think about Jeff Dunham instead and it makes me happy again.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/16 06:44 PM
10

If you don't know by now consider yourself lucky and don't go looking into it. You'll just lose faith in humanity.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/16 06:41 PM
24

Well, you could call it "average," depending on the scale used. The heaviest person on record was Jon Brower Minnoch at an impressive 1,400lbs. If you use him as the end of your spectrum, she starts to look pretty "average."
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/16 06:40 PM
-4

Unfortunately, I don't understand. I don't understand how you can think that 'shock value' is going to win you hearts and minds. I don't understand how you think pretending to believe abortions should be banned based on a lack of men's reproductive rights is somehow going to convince people to believe in them. It isn't. All you manage to do with this method of reasoning is further alienate the people you are trying to attract. It's wrong. The line of reasoning is wrong. Your approach is wrong. I…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 08:07 AM
-14

Seriously? I'm to get an education, you say. It's perfectly acceptable to spout "literary devices" that are indefensible and do nothing to further the discussion, purely on the grounds that they are a thought experiment? You're driving the wrong way down a one way street here, big guy. Instead of experimenting us backwards in civil rights, why not let's try moving forward, eh? Shit like this is why people don't take MRA's seriously.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 04:36 AM
-2

? I'm pretty anti-feminism. I'm against any group or movement that has a set agenda that aims to push or hold anyone down in order to gain power and influence for themselves or their group. Not sure how that's relevant though. Do you believe only feminists hold the belief that people should mean what they say and say what they mean?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 04:28 AM
-10

He literally just said "abortions need to be banned." I get that maybe he's not totally serious and maybe he didn't mean it like that, but then maybe he shouldn't have worded it that way, but come on, man, that's not healthy discourse and to imply that he meant other than what he actually said is just arguing semantics. As far as men not consenting to having their condoms pricked.. I agree with you. But how is that relevant? I would think that proves my point more than refutes it. I'm saying we …
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:37 AM
-13

They don't consent to being raped. Also, if you're about to have a baby that will die and may kill you, it would be beneficial to be able to abort. There are many more facets to this argument, it's not just black and white. Instead of punishing one gender in order to provide equality, we need to look at it from a level headed perspective and see what's in the best interest of all parties. As it stands we are in a situation which is unfair to men. We don't need to be unfair to women to make it fa…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:19 AM
1

Aww.. Now I miss George Carlin.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 10:57 PM
7

Men still work long hours in mines, mills and fields. ;)
/r/MensRights28/08/16 10:48 PM
6

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fLotehGgbiE
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:30 PM
1

I'd imagine it has something to do with the fact that if all you do is judge potential rapists all day, everyone starts to look like a rapist. I know a few (2 actually) police officers who worked the downtown beat of a major city. They ended up quitting and completely changing careers because everyone started to look like a lying drug-using/dealing criminal to them. It skewed they're sense of reason and their outlook of society and people.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 03:25 AM
5

I think she's right. Victims deserve unprejudiced justice. So when it turns out the claim was false, the accuser must be punished because otherwise the victim will not receive unprejudiced justice. The victim must always see justice served. That means the 17% (I think?) of rape cases that are false will still result in a conviction (of the accuser) which will bring your numbers up on conviction rates considerably! Win win!
/r/MensRights14/08/16 03:19 AM
3

If they want to stop a fight, they should be removing the person that is posturing forward and throwing kicks. She's absolutely sure in her belief that she can assault with impunity. They are literally holding him back so she can do so, which means she will push the issue as far as she feels like it because she knows there will be no repercussions. She was wrong. Reach advantage is a motherfucker.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/16 06:47 AM
9

Except jail is often a death sentence for convicted rapists.. So why bother going to jail?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 07:58 PM
3

Story changes the more attractive you are. They want to pick and choose and punish how they see fit. If Jared Leto was on a subway giving every girl in there the creepiest stare he could imagine, they'd all melt. Jared from Subway? Not so much.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 04:42 PM
5

They argue alright, but you're right about not using facts. The problem with using facts in an argument is that they are solid. Facts don't change, they don't move, and sometimes they don't fit your narrative. Feelings, however, are fluid. They can do a 180 on a whim. Feelings can be altered, flow and fit whatever narrative you'd like them too. Feelings are much better to argue with because they are strong enough to be taken seriously, but not anchored like facts. So a person can -feel- unsafe e…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 04:40 PM
1

But isn't two negatives a positive??
/r/MensRights12/08/16 02:46 AM
1

Wonder Woman would be an example of a badass chick, and I'll definitely be seeing that movie. Looks awesome.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/16 02:42 PM
3

People have seemed to amalgamate the feeling of safety with the condition of safety. Certain people feel that the world needs to change because they don't feel safe waking down dark back alleys at night. There really is no reasoning with this people.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:32 PM
29

You just disagreed with his statement in the first sentence and reinforced it in the other..
/r/seduction30/04/16 08:03 PM
1

They are not motivated because the education system has been built to suppress them. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OFpYj0E-yb4 http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-against-boys/304659/ http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/why-boys-are-failing-in-a_b_884262.html http://www.macleans.ca/general/how-schools-pathologize-boyishness-and-why-rough-and-tumble-play-forges-social-skills/
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:10 PM
3

Especially since we can pay the female marines 78% less. It's a no brainer.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 03:30 PM
2

Do you have a source on this? I'm not arguing or anything, that just sounds too unbelievable to not check out. That seems like the bottom of the barrel we're being dragged down in.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:37 AM
3

Ever stick weld before? The flux burns off to provide an oxygen void around the bead. You can be welding in the middle of a football field and you're still enveloped by a cloud of toxic smoke. OHSA doesn't require the use of a respirator. Also, I said cramped space and not confined space for a reason. You can be in a cramped space without being in a legally defined 'confined' space environment (which is simply limited egress and not intended for continued human occupancy.. So it can be the middl…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:16 AM
14

"Similarly, women who now fill manufacturing jobs as packaging and filling machine operators earn roughly $26,000 a year. They could, with additional training, compete for positions as welders, which pay a median $39,000 a year. Both jobs require arm-hand steadiness, manual dexterity and control precision." Sounds like an article written by a person who's never stepped inside an industrial plant and has no idea what it's like to weld for a living. There's a reason why welding pays higher than av…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:47 PM
7

That's exactly what will happen, because for the past 3 decades, no one has been forcing women to take certain classes. They do so of their own volition. I applaud women engineers. But don't look down on women teachers, nurses, secretaries, etc. Because they chose a career that is common for their gender. The idea that women should be free to choose whatever career they want goes both ways. They should be free to chose a stereotypical career as well. This coming from a man in trades. I would lov…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:46 AM
7

He forgot the /s
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:41 AM
6

http://imgur.com/kq7lbky
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:40 AM
-11

How are they Native American by default? By that logic, I'm Native American even though I'm a Caucasian Canadian. The purpose of the title 'Native American' is to differentiate them from everyone else and bundle them all into one easy word to simply things. They are Tulalip, how you choose to name them is up to you. I'm sure much like the many native bands that live near me and many of the 'First Nations' people that I work with, they really don't care if you call them Indian, or Native. However…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:05 PM
11

Seriously? White people named them Indians and white people feeling guilting over what we did to them, pretending to be respectful, named them Native Americans. You're being PC. If you want to be respectful as you say, call them Choctaw.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 05:20 PM
4

I believe you would have to prove your belief was reasonable in court.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:19 PM
18

It's called Reasonable Force, and it's gender neutral. Use only as much force is necessary to defend yourself. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Reasonable+Force
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:29 PM
1

Actually, they do. Normal people choose not to use it. Crazy people exploit the fuck out of their gender, age, height, weight, skin colour, intelligence, lack of intelligence, etc. etc. Just because you choose not to believe it true and keep yourself ignorant to the risks of associating with people that are perfectly willing to act like this doesn't change anything, it just makes you more at risk to be exploited.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:52 PM
7

Exactly. In jail at least you'll have some alone time. Have a kid with crazy and she'll use you for nothing but a babysitter and a paycheque. For. 18. Goddamn. Years.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:39 AM
11

Haven't been out much, have you?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:36 AM
1

A sheet of 5/8" drywall weighs around 75lbs. You're only, what, 3" tall, -maybe- 3 oz.? How?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:44 AM
2

Haha.. We just keep things running. But we do go into places that aren't exactly safe. Risk is definitely part of the job. We get the credit when we deserve it though, and the wage to reflect it. Male teachers are a rare breed and deserve a lot more recognition than they receive.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:40 AM
3

Which is unfortunate, because people lean away from teaching positions based on the lack of income compared to education level, and the abuse they receive, when good teachers are some of the most important figures for the success of any country.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:37 AM
11

I can see the confusion on first glance.. 5/8"x4'x8'.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:13 AM
83

Ever installed 5/8" drywall on the ceiling? There's a shortage of men that want to do that too.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:50 PM
1

Which ones? At the top of the list includes electricians, plumbers, carpenters, boilermakers, auto mechanics.. You've seriously never heard of those careers?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:48 PM
3

With the cost of child care, if you have two or more kids it can rapidly become working just to pay for daycare.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:45 PM
3

Your part time job at Burger King hardly counts as much. Don't you have a protest or blockade to attend? Beat it.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:42 PM
12

I'm a Millwright, (98.2% male, 27th most lethal job) and I'd like to say thank you for what you do. Being a man in the field of education is dangerous in a much different way that my trade. We need more male teachers, so thank you for braving the risks inherit in being a man surrounded by children in a society that vilifies men that work with children.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:33 PM
3

There was a scandal in 1998 that would say otherwise..
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:55 PM
12

Nice straw man. Women are made to care, men are made to protect. That's why the military is full of men, and the nursing profession is full of women.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:18 PM
2

Your sides can do whatever they'd like. You're not disproving anything. You can bury your head in the sand all you want. You won't be getting an a abortion in Canada after 22 weeks without a reason... Whiiiich.. Was your whole argument. Also.. Wow. In what world is a late term baby 3/4 of a pound? You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:39 AM
2

Cultures individuals you say? "Abortions in the third trimester are very rare. Only a few hospitals in Quebec can carry out these abortions, such as Hôpital Sainte-Justine. Other health-care institutions are not equipped to deal with abortions at this stage of a pregnancy." Wonder why?? Maybe because as I've already stated late term abortions are legal, in cases where there is a danger to the mother, whereas late term abortions are not happening in Canada without a reason. Try again, big guy. Ac…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:28 AM
1

You might want to look again, not sure when you last looked, but I'll say it again. Outside of a legitimate medical danger to the mother.. Abortion is only legal up to 24 weeks in the US. Hopefully you are not a fellow Canuck, but if you are, we only allow it until 22 weeks. But I'm sure you can use your dictionary definition of fetus to justify your delusions, but the real world has facts and laws. Oh, and also, empathy, ya psycho.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:09 AM
2

If you think that aborting a 38 week only baby is perfectly fine simply because the law says so (fun fact, the law doesn't even agree with you. In fact, no one here does either), you're a morally devoid, sad excuse for a human being who probably at least boarder lines on the sociopathic. Again, nothing is so black and white. Most of all this. Instead of using a dictionary and a thesaurus to make sad little arguments about how everyone straw mans you, pick up a biology book and see if you can spo…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:37 AM
2

Again, you really need to review what a straw man is. In this thread, you've called everyone's counter-arguments straw men. Every disagreeing idea to you is a straw man. Give it a rest. You LITERALLY believe people are not physically developed to be classified as people until the very instance of birth. It's ridiculous and not based on anything resembling a rational thought. At any time between 37 and 41 weeks a baby can be born with no danger to either the mother or the baby. You can't say that…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:40 AM
2

You need to look up what a straw man is. If I quote you verbatim, it's not a straw man. No ones talking about drowning children after their born, you say. However, Literally minutes before they are born is perfectly fine -for no reason at all- according to you. Absolutely there are illegitimate reasons for aborting a full term pregnancy. I can't believe I even have to type that out for you. Surprise, life isn't black and white. You might want to read up a little on pregnancy and the stages of de…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:58 AM
2

If it needs an artificial womb, it's not viable outside of the mother. Transferring it to an artificial mother doesn't somehow magically make the child viable. It still needs a womb, natural or not. I never said anything about murder. Not everything that dies is murdered. Death by natural causes is not murder, in any way shape or form. "Your silly logic" of "because she wants to" has no separation from mothers that want to drown their kids in the bathtub. You watch an ultrasound and see a child …
/r/MensRights10/01/16 11:41 PM
4

If it's viable outside of the mothers womb, it's an unborn child, not a fetus. It still has to come out of you. Why kill it first?
/r/MensRights10/01/16 06:57 PM
3

Date is relevant, why?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:51 AM
2

Because after all, marriage is the only way a man can take any responsibility in this world. ......./s
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:51 AM
8

I haven't seen it. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 10:54 PM
14

Except they have the very definition of rape as a man as the aggressor. According to them women can't rape, therefor cannot be charged with it. Edit: What they'll end up with is a world full of men who are so sick and tired of getting kicked in the nuts they pull away from women entirely. They'll stop going to college, getting married, having kids. Collapse. The women's movement did a lot of good in the past. Now it aims to tear down the whole system in a pathetic attempt to remain the victim.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:43 PM
19

You mean like, Prince Adam? Or.. Prince Adam?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/15 05:35 AM
7

I doubt they find it at all sexist that women specific cancers received over 3x the amount of government funding that men specific cancers, even though rates between the two are comparatively similar.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:00 AM
1

Oh, I would agree that there may not even be -any- jobs that men HAVE to do. Women are fully capable of performing in the physically demanding careers. It's that men are much more capable at those tasks and to a greater extent, more willing. Evolution has simply made us better suited to those types of tasks, and society has made it acceptable for women to refuse to do them. As technology advances, those labour intensive positions will continue to steadily decline as well. This video my CGP Grey …
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:34 PM
1

Yup. Typo. Fixed it. Thank you! :)
/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:22 PM
1

I am not saying that the majority of jobs can't be done by both genders. It was the implication that there are almost no male dominated jobs out there or that they are a vanishingly small amount. +-20% is still a large margin for a single gender to occupy.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:22 PM
2

British Columbian here, and well, according to -your- stats the total for all industries in Canada totals 17.8 million, so I don't see how the service sector can be 20 million. Still using your stats, the goods producing sector (which is male dominated and includes all the most dangerous jobs too, btw) STILL totals near 4 million. 4 million out of 18 million is not a vanishingly small number. It's damn near 25%. That's still not including (completely male dominated) transportation and warehousin…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:15 AM
4

Not sure what you do for a living, and therefore what you see for jobs and careers day to day, but I can tell you that jobs where gender doesn't matter aren't vanishingly small. I work in mining right now, but I've worked in manufacturing, forestry, steel and oil and gas. There are a great many careers out there that are dominated by the male gender, and for a reason. Mining, farming, forestry, fishing, construction, manufacturing, chemical extraction, oil and gas.. Etc. Etc.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 04:30 PM
2

The Middle East encompasses 90 percent of the area of the contiguous United States and consists of about 17 different countries. But yeah, they're all terrorist Muslims!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/15 02:48 AM
1

That would totally be true, except the graph compares women to men. If they were to just stick to the one gender and talk about how women are more likely to be murdered than any other form of workplace death and that's bad, that would be fine. The problem here is they put women's and men's fatalities side by side as if they are equal, when in fact this is arguably the single greatest discrepancy between our genders. The numbers are so far apart it's staggering. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:03 AM
10

It's not hard when nowadays having a guy open a door for you is rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/15 06:21 PM
1

The system you are describing when the way of the dodo bird back in medieval times. Sure, mom and pop corner stores could exist without much regulation, but we're talking multinational corporations. Not only could they not function without laws, it would be a very very bad idea. Take Bayer. They had a drug that was contaminated with HIV. Instead of selling it in the US which has strong regulatory bodies, they shipped it overseas and sold it there, infecting hundreds. Those countries that didn't …
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:28 PM
1

That's precisely my point. -Contracted-. What good would a contract be without the contract law to back it up? Corporations exist because of corporate law. Companies exist because of business law. Employees are protected by employment standards. If someone can just immediately reverse engineer your new invention, what's your incentive to invent anything? Even private companies and corporations, those things you aren't against, have a hierarchy. Without it, what employee would work hard? Maybe so…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:59 PM
-1

Anarchists are always good for a laugh. You think Reddit would exist right now if we were in a state of anarchy? The Internet? You think you would have a cell phone? GPS? Roads, hospitals, fire departments, the FDA, CDC? The list is long. All of these things require organization, rules, laws. Who's going to enforce these laws without any hierarchy? What is a law that's not enforced? Not a law. Everything you take for granted in your daily life, your car that takes you to and from work where you …
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:38 PM
0

That somewhere Syria you mentioned? Anarchy. Anarchy isn't a system, it's a lack of system. It's like saying the kind of food you enjoy is starvation.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:37 PM
2

From one happily married dude to another, a grand total of 5 upvotes is the best I could do for ya. Seems poor life choices and blaming women for your own inadequacies is popular around here..
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/15 08:31 AM
6

There is a popular complaint among women. They say to their girlfriends, "why are all guys assholes?" The problem isn't that all guys are assholes, it's that they are constantly hooking up with the same type of guy. An asshole. It doesn't make every guy an asshole, that she is attracted to assholes.. Just that the assholes she chooses to date are, in fact, assholes. Perhaps, and I'm not saying this is definitive, but -maybe- if you feel like all women are manipulative, needy, entitled people tha…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/15 08:26 AM
4

FWIW, I upvoted you. You have the right idea. The thing is, if you know the MRA movement and see the opinions and mind sets of the people who identify as MRAs, you see reason, you see acceptance, you see kindness. You see people who genuinely want to help others and live a fair life. Radicals who have decided to be anti-MRA for their own reasons will search for anything to validate their position. So even if 1 out of every 1000 MRAs is in it for the wrong reasons, they will find that one and use…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:30 AM
5

You mean the implication that if rape laws were lowered more guys would rape? I don't much like that suggestion either. You were downvoted, but I agree with your premise. We should be of a higher standard, not suggesting we lower ourselves. Comments such as that are the ones feminists cherry pick to make men look bad.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 08:08 PM
3

That's what I mean. He is trying to defend her, so he uses wordplay to alter her actions. instead of saying she hit him, he says "she reacts" or.. Instead of saying she threatened to punch him, he says she "raised her arm." He words things differently so she doesn't seem like an entitled princess who got served a hardcore dose of reality.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/15 01:51 AM
1

Not if it detracts from your narrative. He described her punching him as "she reacts" earlier. It's all wordplay.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/15 01:24 AM
1

You can't honestly believe what you just said made any sense. Just... wow.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:33 PM
1

Ignoring the fact that that didn't make any sense whatsoever (I think you may have gotten your insult backwards), I thought "victim blaming" was an actual think you feminists abhorred? Kind of highlights the rampant sexism, double-standards and out-right hypocrisies your little group spews on a daily basis, no? Do you get some kind of rush from being annoying on the Internet? Are you fighting some kind of good fight? Taking on the man? Come on.. What happens when you finally graduate, have to be…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 01:55 PM
1

So you don't know what derailing or feminism means.. I don't think I can save this one..
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:39 PM
1

Hahaha http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Derailing
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:12 AM
1

Spoken like a true armchair feminist.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:10 AM
1

I'm no one's victim, let's make that perfectly clear. I'm perfectly capable of making and being responsible for my own actions. I just which feminists would do the same.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:42 AM
1

I asked a very specific question. You insulted me. Who's derailing?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:32 AM
1

Using insult instead of argument is the sign of a small mind.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:54 AM
1

You're still not listening, and you're still not answering the question. A feminist who can't think for herself, pretty much a given. But a feminist who can't even describe feminism for herself, that's just hilarious.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:36 AM
1

Both ways? How can that be abused both ways when it's gender specific? On a side note, why do you keep down voting yourself? Your comments are 0 as soon as you post them..
/r/MensRights14/07/15 09:41 PM
1

Once again, I'm not asking what feminism is. I'm asking what -you think- it is. These are very different things. Please try and focus.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:59 PM
1

Are you going to continue to have a conversation with yourself, or are you going to reply to my questions? Anyone can google a word. I asked what YOU thought feminism was. Unless, of course, you are incapable of having your own.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:05 PM
1

Exactly! Now can you understand how that kind of thought process could be.. abused?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:44 PM
2

You know someday, maybe soon, you're going to graduate high school. You're going to want people to treat you like an adult. Before then, I advise, you should start acting like one. However, what you are saying here is, you can't, on your own describe your own movement. You like so many others fall back on an unsound "dictionary definition" of the word, while acting completely contrary and with sordid motives to your unsubstantiated claims of equal treatment and equal rights. You are not part of …
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:23 PM
2

For once, I agree with you. If Jake and Josie start fooling around, Josie says no, and Jake continues regardless that would be rape. Even if Josie says yes, but halfway through says no, after she says no, Jake must stop or its rape. No question. However, You can quite easily be accused of a rape when your full intention, and every indication pointed to consensual sex. This poster is implying is that even with Josie saying yes it's still rape, because alcohol was consumed. It's preposterous and d…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:35 PM
1

Is that so? Well, care to explain then?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:51 AM
1

The poster didn't claim she didn't give consent. It claimed she was unable to. Which means, apparently, even if she said yes over and over again, it's still rape because she was no longer in control of herself. The concept itself is terribly insulting to women. My SO has been blitzed out of her tree on numerous occasions when we were younger, and still had sound enough mind to take care of all her friends before putting herself in a cab and heading home safely. Women in general are strong, smart…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:37 AM
1

When I'm talking about actual rapists, I'm talking about serial rapists and people who intentionally and deliberately rape another person. Those people deserve the whole book thrown at them, and then to rot in a small hole somewhere. Nobody defends actual rapists. Even in jail, surrounded by the worst criminals, rapists are among the most hated. The people whom we try and defend, are guys like Jake here or guys caught up in situations where they genuinely acted with no intention of raping anyone…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:21 AM
2

I understand -exactly- what feminism is. No, that was not your argument. Your argument was if two people get drunk, the man is a rapist.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:31 PM
3

What we are asking for is everyone to be held accountable for their own actions. No one here will argue that actual rapists should not be put on trial. That's not anyone's belief. What we do want, is to protect innocent men from wrongful accusations because feminists -do NOT- care about men. Your very claim IS that women shouldn't be held accountable for drinking and having sex. That's your whole argument. So not really sure how you can accuse that of me.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:43 PM
3

"If you don't rape someone, you can't be held responsible for raping someone." Wouldn't that be lovely if feminists actually believed that? It's funny because that's actually counter to pretty much your entire argument. What you are saying is, regardless of consent, any situation where a man and women have sex involving alcohol, the man is a rapist. Which is ridiculous. Two people can have drunken sex without someone automatically being a rapist. Consent and non-consent are the only factors that…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:26 PM
3

Good luck with that. Abstinence -always- works out.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:56 PM
3

And thank god for that.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:40 PM
4

I'm amazed. That has to be the least intelligent thing you've said so far. Seriously? Calculate how many drinks? How? If they are both drunk then how do you accurately calculate consumption to a level that will satisfy a judge? Maybe it was a club and be paid by credit card, but women are given free shots all the time by anyone from friends, strangers or bar staff. Most nights out are cash only. How do you "prove consumption" then? Start dusting for prints? Even then, how do you prove he was dri…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:40 PM
5

Would you agree then that if she had less to drink and was less drunk it's her fault regardless?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:07 AM
13

Actually, they did. Any existence of exceptions to the rule mean you can't make the outright claim that Jake WAS less drunk. Merely acknowledging that some men have a lower tolerance than some women, you disproved your own "fact". Majorities are irrelevant. You cannot claim that because most men have a higher tolerance, that this man does. You cannot make claims about who was more or less drunk or in control based off the information provided. You did off speculation and assumption, not fact.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:04 AM
20

Saying that she "appears" smaller? Speculative. That she likely has a lower tolerance to alcohol? Speculative. Saying that he could have also overpowered, threatened, intimidated her? Wildly speculative and also, irrelevant. What did I say in my last comment that didn't pertain directly to your previous comment?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:19 AM
29

Almost everything you just said was wildly speculative and had no bearing on what little was actually given in the scenario.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:04 AM
1

I guess it's too hard to demonstrate higher user growth while swinging around a massive banhammer.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:26 AM
23

How would Jake be less drunk? I know plenty of women with really high tolerance for alcohol. Conversely I know many men with very low alcohol tolerance. Physiology isn't the only factor dictating impairment, and not all men are bigger than all women, so you can't use gender to dictate responsibility. Also, to add, why can't they both be responsible for their own actions?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:08 AM
4

Did you seriously throw down a No True Scotsman? I'm a little unsure if that was the point or if you were being serious. Either way, that's hilarious!
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:24 AM
11

Right. No one can know what's going on in your own head. This goes for any situation. If you aren't comfortable, say something. If you don't want to do something, say so. After that, the onus is on the other person to respect your wishes.. but at least give them the chance.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:51 PM
1

Ok. So it sounds like you're saying it's more of a PR issue than anything else? As in, the civilian world doesn't have any understanding of military experience and how it relates to civilian careers? Just curious. I went into the trades myself, so my knowledge of military life is limited to the media and Hollywood portrayals, few documentaries, etc.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:23 PM
1

I see. What if enlistment remained the same, but a minimum age for actual combat environments?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:30 PM
1

Would you say that the enlistment age should be raised to allow young people to mature more before becoming servicemen/women?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:17 PM
7

It's amazing how much detail she demands of the data here, when she's quite happy with the gender gap's glaring lack of any detail at all.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:16 AM
1

Let's not be so insulting to socialists.. :P
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:12 PM
27

All of the benefits, none of the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:07 PM
5

"To ensure gender equality it is important in many cases that women and men are treated equally. But they should not necessarily be treated equally in all situations. In some cases, the underprivileged gender must be favoured to be able obtain similar results." In some situations, you say? The underprivileged gender? Careful with Pandora's box, you may not like what's inside.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:29 PM
3

I hear ya. That '/s' has turned into a protection from hissy fits from people who can't handle an opinion or viewpoint different than their own. It's a little depressing how easily people can get offended on Reddit these days.. :/
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:32 PM
20

Why the sarcasm tag? I worked in a bar for several years. Not only do they often not pay for their drinks, they outright -expect- men to provide them with free drinks. Often times going to the club with only enough money to pay for coat check and not tip (mostly because the coat check person is usually female and won't be manipulated). I'm by far not saying all women do this, but a disproportionate number of them do. They'd often come right up to the bar and say "give me a free vodka soda." The …
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:16 PM
2

Definitely. If anything that was a great lesson to teach your kids, showing them how you deal with bullies. Good for you.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:38 PM
5

You can't communicate with people like this.. I mean, where do you think her boy learned to talk the way he does?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:47 PM
5

No, but two wrights make an airplane.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:14 PM
4

If you don't want to get hit, don't hit. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.. This is elementary school shit..
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/15 01:05 AM
2

Pomposity. http://m.imgur.com/gallery/Bp8ahlo
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/15 01:02 AM
2

Well, to be fair they are both arguing from the same side of the table, so it's understandable that they could be civil. That being said, conversations like this one affirm my belief that the MRM largely gets a bad rap. You can comment here without fear of being attacked and a reasoned argument is actually welcomed, which is unfortunately rare. I've attempted to give counter point elsewhere to try and see where I might be wrong or ignorant in my beliefs, and some places can be quite aggressive w…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:51 PM
6

It was actually more of a famous name bias than a gender bias.. http://the-artifice.com/jk-rowling-can-not-escape-harry-potter-the-unbreakable-vow/
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:26 PM
2

Also, if you will be promoted simply to fill a quota you'll have no incentive to actually improve, whereas the men will have to work even harder due to less options available for them.. which would then theoretically over time make the men better than their female counterparts at the same job..
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:19 PM
2

Then it would get really noisy outside your office.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:29 PM
258

That's the one part they are completely missing. Those women who are publishing work, or passing firefighters exams or getting STEM degrees are all being lumped in with all these less talented women who otherwise wouldn't have succeeded without special privilege. I feel sorry for those women who busted their asses to get ahead and do great things, and ultimately get lumped in with a bunch of cheaters who don't deserve to be there.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:27 PM
11

Please keep going. People like you are who we need the most. You seem purely to want help others and ignore all the fighting, hate and anger. You can't be ignored forever, and sooner or later people will start to realize how horrible it is that people are fighting to stop you from doing good and making lives better. I commend you, sir.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:40 PM
6

I don't think he wants to start an anti-misandry group though. I'm pretty sure he's not anti-hate, he's pro-help. He doesn't want to stop anyone, he wants to help men. And he shouldn't have to skirt around feminist groups to do it. I like where you're coming from, but this has to be dealt with head on or it will never be fixed.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:35 PM
3

Why should I have to put up a sign that says no entry? Unless I give constant consent to enter my home how dare someone tell me I have to put up a sign! To protest this horrible rob culture I'm going to remove all the doors and windows from my house, to show the world it's not ok to rob me! Edit: /S.. Just in case.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:19 AM
3

It boggles my mind how some people can think that they don't have to act proactively to avoid criminal activity, yet probably still lock their doors at night. The ignorance is staggering.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:23 AM
2

I'm confused.. People are often encouraged to get a security system, or better lock, or remove bushes from Windows.. Etc. to discourage home invasions. In fact there are a few online government websites that will give you lots of advice on securing your home.. It's just being proactive and protecting yourself and your family. How is this different than protecting yourself when out in public? Your own safety is your own responsibility. Period. I'm 100% all for stopping rape, and punishing rapists…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:14 AM
10

That sounds like a terrible idea. Such a waste of delicious maple syrup. ;)
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:58 PM
12

Rational discussion is threatening to their status quo.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:25 PM
4

She edited the time stamp to make it pretty clear she's reenacting Paul raping her, pushing the agenda. The university found him innocent, and she dropped the case when the cops tried to actually investigate it. This is libel, and I hope he sues.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:53 PM
1

"Do you hate me? If so, how does it feel to hate me?" Pretty good, actually.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:36 PM
3

Except you call yourself a feminist, those people who you call neofeminists call themselves feminists, we call you feminists, and we call them feminists. It's all feminist. They don't call themselves neofeminists, and he doesn't call himself a squirrel. So the only person calling people names other than what they call themselves is you.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 05:58 PM
12

Don't forget cheap child care. If you're a stay at home mom why do you have childcare? You ARE the child care.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 04:20 PM
6

That's the same as the "never hit a girl" statement. What if she's bigger than the man, Stronger, or martially trained? What other than sexism justifies this train of thought? What's wrong with "never hit anyone?"
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:04 PM
14

That seems the only conclusion when using this twisted logic. They are saying women don't have the mental capacity to drink, so really, then they shouldn't be allowed to. It's ludicrous.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:02 PM
3

Well, believe it or not, they are people. So, naturally there are good ones and bad ones, just like men. Writing the whole opposite gender off because of a few crazies will only leave you disconnected from half the human race. I have been lucky enough to find a great one, and some of my best friends are women. This us vs. them mentality hurts us, it doesn't help us.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:29 AM
1

I have to admit, I couldn't read it all. That was too much negativity for me to handle. I'm sorry all those things happened to you. It really sucks that that many shitty people ended up in your life. Hopefully you have met some good ones, and have them in your life. If it's any consolation, I consider myself a strong willed and confident person, and I'm unsure I would be able to still be standing after all of that. So you my friend, are stronger than me. You're also a stronger, better person tha…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 03:57 AM
3

Worked in a night club and worked for a maintenance company that fixed them. Hands down women's bathrooms are the worst. I'll clean out filthy bar drains with rotting months old lime wedges. Women break commercial grade toilets into pieces, clog them with applicators and pads.. Smear.. Things.. All over. Just nasty. To be clear, I find rape just as disgusting as club women's bathrooms. And I can't imagine a more hellish nightmare of sights and smells than a nightclub's "ladies" washroom.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:55 AM
1

Yeah, that should have been a reply to the post you commented on. There's no "burden" being lifted off men by taking fireman positions. Those are sought after. Drill for oil for 12 hour days in camp.. Haha
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:51 PM
3

Because uneducated opinions are heard and uneducated people listen, regurgitate that information, and also vote.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:55 PM
3

I like gender roles as well, when they work. The thing is, they work for me and my SO, and I'm not the kind of person to project those ideals on others. What works for some, doesn't work for others. Everyone else can act how they please, and I'm happy with that too.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:53 PM
1

There's no ban on women becoming industrial tradesman. All this talk about firefighters, you'd think it was actually a deadly job. It isn't. Logging is. Mining is. No glory there though, no one patting you on the back telling you how awesome you are. All of these industries nearly all male.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:50 PM
2

Rebuttal: I'm an industrial tradesman. We're more likely to die than fireman or soldiers. Never has there been a ban on women, we'd love to see some. Any? Nope. Not one. It's not glorious and no one is trying to stop you so where's the incentive, I suppose. Plus, it's actually hard work.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:45 PM
6

That's a pretty long winded attempt to justify racism. If you really want to talk about Jim Crow, go ahead. It was wrong, and no one is denying that. But white people aren't to blame for Jim Crow, a small group of racist people are to blame Just like all of Islam isn't to blame for 9/11, or every German person ever isn't to blame for World War 2. Blaming an entire race of people for something a small group of racists did in one country is itself racism. Plain and simple. An excuse to justify you…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:49 AM
17

You're using the same logic she is. It's just all racism. It was racism before when other people said it, it's racism now, it will be racism when the next person says it. It's pretty simple.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 08:43 PM
0

I'm not seeing where you are referring to, could you point me to the specific part of the article? I did read a lovely article about a group of teachers getting shit on for about 80 years, and constantly fighting for better education.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:47 PM
4

Out of curiosity, what makes you believe teachers are more likely to complain about a wage gap? Especially given their unionized position that guarantees income based on seniority and education? Every time I've ever seen a teacher complaining about wages, it was about the lack of funding for schools and the lack of parity between their raises and inflation.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:25 PM
4

If that rationale was used for men as well then I would agree with you. But if she does end up passing it, how long will she be at that level of physical shape for? She would have to push herself beyond what she's really capable of to pass.. Would she be able to maintain that going into her career?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:29 PM
16

Nurses damn well deserve it. They are the real heroes in the hospital, who get very little credit for what they do or how hard they work. Here nurses and teachers get very little respect, and I can't for the life of me understand that.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:26 PM
2

It's garbage?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:10 PM
16

Let's not be so insulting to textbooks.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 01:15 PM
2

Taxes I don't have a problem with. It's their phenomenal misuse I have a problem with.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 10:17 PM
1

You're right, women DO make up a vast majority of the single parents, according to U.S. Census Bureau, there was 12 million single parent families in 2014, more than 80% were headed by single mother. That is an injustice of an entirely different subject. 12 million single parents. What's the total number of families in the U.S.? Over 80 million. That's 40 million men that can work a little less to the bone to cover child care, and 12 million apparently parasitic single mothers. But feel free to …
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:30 PM
1

Exactly. I'm a millwright, I have yet to see a working journeywoman millwright. No one is up in arms about how we're keeping women out. There's no campaigns in schools about the sexist trades industry. Seriously. Come on in. We'd love to see a few women around. Careful though, we work in the mining and lumber industry, two of the top ten most lethal fields. Where are the feminists screaming about the lack of women in all of the fields us men are dying in?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 04:41 PM
3

The rhetoric in this sub is amazing. What about single fathers? I'm sure they could use the help. Low income families? Tough to get ahead in life when you're living paycheck to paycheck because child care is sucking up all your income. Government funded child care would help ten if not hundreds of millions of people. But yeah, those parasite single moms, amirite?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 04:17 PM
5

I'm pretty sure the oil and gas industry will squash this thing pretty fast if it has to pay office clerks as much as rig pigs. $42/hr working 12 hour days, those boys can clear 150k a year. This bill would destroy the economy if it forced equality. Either they'd fire all their office staff, or they'd lose all their tradesman. That's a no win scenario for all heavy industry.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:52 PM
2

Government funded child care actually sounds pretty sweet..
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:13 PM
1

If you are saying that discriminating against gender is the same as race then yes, I did miss your point.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:07 AM
1

Again, no ones getting any special rights. You aren't being denied some right. You're still fully capable of parking your car. If you're looking for your perfect world completely lacking in anything that might even closely be considered discriminatory then you will see a world full of people devoid of care and compassion for others, such as what you are exhibiting here. Perhaps Marxism is your thing. I hear the third wave feminists love it.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 11:53 PM
2

Doesn't all of that data basically say that women predominately like working in health, education and phycology, and dislike working in computer science? Shouldn't women be free to choose whatever field they want? Is anyone stopping them from becoming programmers? I'm confused as to where the injustice is here.. Everyone is free to do what they want, and they're mad because women aren't doing what they're supposed to?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:56 PM
1

Probably when 4/5ths of the population also start weirdly carrying around bowling balls at random. Then people would gladly accept there being a nice little spot right there just behind the ones for new and expectant parents for you and your strange compatriots. Also if you'll notice, no one here is demanding these spots, or saying anything about any rights, God given or otherwise. Let's not invent any more imagined slights.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 09:32 PM
5

Had to go a long way down for this. Going to be tough to get a new Prius, put gas in it, drive on a road, work at an office with working power, sewer, running water.. Gonna have to grow your own food, raise and slaughter your own meat, mine and forge your own metal to manufacture.. Pretty much all of your crap. The world is built and maintained by men. We die in droves to keep this machine running. Have fun. with that.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:11 PM
2

They're both, because the world isn't as black and white as you seem to think it is. Often times these spots are a little wider than a normal spot, to make it a little easier to get a car seat in and out of a side door; just like handicap spaces are wider to allow for wheel chair accessibility. Since you don't require either, you don't require the spot. There is a legitimate need, and thus, a supply. There is a purpose to this, so it's not discrimination. If you're so super strong and capable, y…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:42 PM
2

That's called being a dick and masking it with equality. Such a complete lack of compassion and empathy does no one any good. Grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:24 PM
0

Actually, no. There is rationale to reserving a couple spots for people that need them, for whatever reason. Adding race is just a cop out to try and prove your point and has no value beyond the shock you intended to apply. Race, also, is protected. Not being pregnant, isn't.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:52 PM
144

"I identify as a pregnant woman."
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:25 AM
112

Which does happen. The local Toy's R Us used to have this sign. Now it says "New and Expectant Parents."
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:24 AM
4

Sorry, but that made me cringe a little. Here's a helpful list! (#8) http://www.lifehack.org/articles/communication/25-common-phrases-that-youre-saying-wrong.html
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:30 PM
7

You figure women don't progress in the workforce as fast or high as us because they are weaker? What basis do you have for this statement? That they are attracted to strong or confident men? That is ridiculous. This sub is here to highlight and discuss the rights of men and support those that need it. It is not here to hate on women. Take that garbage somewhere else.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:24 PM
1

Probably because they were wiped out a long time ago. I feel like I missed out on the experience. A place where a guy can go and just be a guy with other guys, hang out, have some drinks, read.. Just relax. Sounds so awesome.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:30 PM
1

77%. Or, 77 of a possible 100. Or, 77 cents on the dollar. Kinda makes you wonder what the real gender wage gap is if we started factoring for all other controls.. That's just one.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:41 PM
1

We've had GFCIs since the early '60s...
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:01 AM
5

There are male spaces? ;)
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:15 AM
3

Reporters across all fields have an expectation to be professional in public, and of course making comments on people's attractiveness isn't professional. Also in the case of sportscasters we are dealing with professional athletes, so if they were commenting on the attractiveness of people there would be no coverage of the sport itself, but I digress. While it may be unprofessional, that's not the angle being used to attack this man. He's being attacked from a sexist point of view, not a profess…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:32 AM
8

True. But women could easily start referring to him as if he were for sale at a meat market and no one would care. Guys would even agree, he is after all, an attractive man. I'm sure Brady himself takes all the lewd, disrespectful and heavily sexists remarks made by women to and about him as compliments. Probably because THEY ARE. Tom Brady, however, is in his position based on his athletic talent and ability, whereas these women are there solely on their attractiveness. This is literally why th…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:19 AM
4

You mean like freedom fighters, insurgents, terrorists and rebels?
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:09 AM
3

In some instances they consider cat calling to be sexual assault. So yeah, if you word it right you can get whatever result you want.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:14 PM
2

I agree with you that this is less of a men's rights issue and more of a mental health issue. If a man does something like this and goes to jail for it, then THAT would be a men's rights issue. The prison system isn't designed to accept people like this woman, psychiatric facilities are. Though I would like to see a longer minimum sentence and if she's deemed sane enough to leave, she be transferred to a prison for the remainder of a real, meaningful sentence.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:44 PM
1

Then you'd really see the torches and pitchforks come out. Even if it was one out of several pools and only to make the decision balanced and fair.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:35 PM
4

I'm sure then, that there are rules in place at their pool during all hours that regulate the style and coverage of women's bathing suits. I'm sure two-piece suits are banned, and required to cover at minimum, to below the knee. Because, you know, modesty.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:33 PM
142

"We don't believe in the segregation of our services, we don't believe in separating some groups from others on campus." "It's always been clear, McGill is secular and co-ed, and this is what we promote." The university does have women-only hours at one of its swimming pools, but the university says that's different. No, It's segregation. Also, a little hypocrisy for added flavour.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:33 AM
2

Yup. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2631414
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:41 PM
1

I thought the Tea Party loved that book..
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:03 PM
1

Cool, man. Machining is an awesome trade. You guys are amazing. Tolerances down to a hundred thou.. A good machinist can make my day. Gotta have the passion though.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:32 AM
2

Not when you're pushing an agenda.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 03:37 AM
12

Same. I work for an industrial contractor so I move from facility to facility. Some places have 400-500 employees. Maybe 15 of them are woman and 2 of those women aren't in the office. There's no way in hell women are occupying anything close to a small percentage of industrial jobs.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 03:29 AM
12

There's this narrative that men run the world.. There's a lot of anger and jealousy over this. The 'patriarchy.' So naturally the same people that believe this are ecstatic that men are falling behind. But what they've failed to see is not that we 'run' the world, but that we make the world run. Everything you own, every facet of your life, requires at least one job that seemingly only men are willing to do. Oil and gas, mining, manufacturing, transportation, construction.. Without critically th…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:55 PM
5

"I believe in what they're doing. I believe in their standing for a cause, but I just don't believe the statistics they're using are correct. I would love to have a debate with them, about what they believe in. But the fact that they tell me to go away is kind of disheartening," said Jake Knaphus, Jordan High School student." This kid.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:53 PM
1

Well.. That -would- solve the whole apparent rape epidemic in colleges.. Hah.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:07 AM
1

Sadly, It's working too.. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline_sex_discrimination_policy_controversy
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:13 PM
2

I said, "I think the drastic action this woman wants is men to be banned.." I never said she suggested it, and I wasn't quoting her. She does dismiss everything that might be done and claim that "drastic" action needs to be done, but doesn't lay claim to what this drastic action might be. I speculated on her true thoughts on the matter.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:53 PM
3

Can't tell if sarcasm, but how is that not being done? It's drummed into us from infancy to never even so much as hit women. She calls for drastic action.. "Teaching" men not to be murders isn't really drastic. It's also fairly common. I've seen lots of campaigns unfairly accusing all men as being potential rapists and murderers. No, I think the drastic action this woman wants is men to be banned from homes, public spaces, open streets and, yes, parks.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:21 PM
0

I wonder how qualified her opinions on the matter actually are, because she sure seems confident that everything being attempted won't work. In saying that, I don't remember reading the part where she adds to the situation. What was her suggestion as to what is to be done with all these women being killed off? I know she sure made some implications.. But didn't quite have the testicular fortitude to come out and say it.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:53 PM
13

Assault legislation exists because people think physically harming someone is an appropriate response to having your feeling hurt. Also, you go to the police to press charges for assault. If you're poor and can't afford a lawyer, they provide you with one. So, I really don't know what you're trying to convey here..
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:19 PM
47

Seriously? Over name calling? What are you, 12? When a guy attacks another guy for calling him names, that's not 'resolving an issue,' that's assault.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 07:37 PM
5

I don't think she realizes if she takes this to court what a lawyer will do to her. I'm willing to bet she didn't maintain the property adequately.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:44 PM
2

Out of curiosity, what's wrong with Gentleman's Clubs?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:59 AM
3

The "this" I was referring to was the day for boys in his statement, not "excluding boys" from his quote. Every child needs encouragement and inclusion. Excluding boys at an early age just teaches them they are disposable at an early age.. :/
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:57 PM
3

I'm a tradesman, so that's not really my area. Also, those women are teachers, which as I decried, there are a lack of in the male variety. I've done some volunteer work to help encourage young people into the trades, but that was never gender specific since we encourage young girls who have a passion for tradecraft as well, and it tends to be a male dominated workforce anyways.. Of which, I wonder why there are no feminists decrying the lack of a strong female presence in the trades? Mining, oi…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:55 AM
6

Probably because learning useful life skills shouldn't be marginalized down to their effectiveness in getting you laid.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:58 AM
3

They could do this to encourage more boys into teaching and nursing. That would be something positive.. We really need more male role models in the classroom.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:55 AM
3

They've never really had to try. But now they just don't have to pretend they aren't..
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:53 AM
3

I bet if you ever find yourself in a situation where you need a cop, you'd lick his fucking boots. Have some respect for a person who has sworn to risk his life for yours and is legitimately having his life torn apart.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 06:07 AM
0

Please tell me you work at Victoria Secret.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:34 PM
1

Ah. One of them. Well, I'm definitely not a learned academic. But I am a productive member of society, so I have that going for me, which is nice.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:02 AM
1

So.. Pretty much as wrong as humanly possible. Gotcha. Haha Why would a materialistic person choose to be an art teacher?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:35 AM
1

I'd be willing to bet your friend was an art teacher because she didn't concern herself with primarily money, she did it because she loves art and or teaching. HVAC is a great trade, which can be quite lucrative. But more than likely she isn't concerned about the image of dating a tradesman either. IE: I guesstimate your friend is a pretty cool chick.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:58 PM
1

Some public school teachers hold multiple degrees. Even Masters. You put that below general office worker..?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:53 PM
1

Unless you're Japan..
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:45 PM
5

Really, it shouldn't matter. Both genders deserve support and help.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 01:17 AM
1

Yes and no. Bayer wasn't able to harm people with their tainted product in the US because the government prevented them. The U.S. Government however, has little power in foreign countries. It's their respective governments responsibility unfortunately. Given your username I would assume you are adamantly against a one world government. lol I'm not saying that the government is all great and wonderful.. They allow some pretty horrendous stuff.. And even perpetrate some of their own. But really, i…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:46 AM
1

Oh, absolutely. If you look I'm sure you can find anything you'd like.. But how often do you search the Internet to gauge a company before buying a product? I'd say not often. The Internet gets all riled up about something.. And then quickly loses interest and moves on to something else. Take Beyer. They've knowingly done some horrible things around the world, like sell HIV laced products that didn't pass government standards in the US, to third world countries to recoup costs. Without governmen…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:09 AM
2

That would be great if everything had full disclosure. But the reality is that the public don't see or know most of this information. So while people are being discriminated against, you have no idea and can't choose objectively where to spend your dollars.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:52 PM
3

Is it Chappie? I love chappie.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:54 PM
3

God, I must be arguing with a 12 year old. Thank you for choosing not to have kids. This will be your greatest contribution to society. Raising a newborn is a 24 hour a day job. That's 3 TIMES more involved than a single day of work, to help you with the math. You are so unbelievably ignorant about this that I'm blown away that you even feel entitled to add your opinion. You honestly think newborns just chill out all day?? Why not just leave them in the crib with a bunch of snacks and head to wo…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:17 AM
0

I can take a joke too but perhaps the artist could have added a suicide hotline number or something along those lines, for the people who really do feel this way..
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:39 PM
1

Hmm.. Nope. Pretty sure it's you who doesn't understand, bud. Unpaid leave isn't a benefit. It's a protected right. Having a weekend isn't a benefit either. Should employers be allowed to work you 7 days a week? Because they are "forced," as you say, to provide you with this "unpaid time off."
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:16 PM
2

Haha, seriously? If you're going to quote me, at least don't blatantly change the wording, and maybe pay attention. The whole article is about a mans fight for that very thing. Are you upset over the wording? I'll refer to it as parental leave so as I don't "trigger" you, big guy. Maternity/paternity/parental leave, it's all the same thing. Newborns need 24 hour care and are a hell of a lot of work. Certainly no vacation. Whether the man or the woman choose to be the primary care giver in the re…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:03 PM
1

Right. It's pathetic that you think maternity leave is unfair because you choose not to have kids. I don't know what the difficulty is here.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:15 AM
1

"Shit needs to be equal unless I don't benefit from it" was your argument, dipshit. Just because you CHOOSE not to have kids doesn't mean someone else shouldn't benefit, just like if I CHOOSE to not use vacation days, that shouldn't effect you either. Paid maternity leave is a good thing. Don't try to tear other people down because of your choices. That short period of time is a huge life saver to some starting families. Your argument is about as valid as "if poor people didn't want to be poor, …
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:44 PM
1

Probably one that wants to treat their employees well? Some offer benefits, some offer rrsp contributions.. These are over and above pay. When you have options on who to work for, you look at what benefits they offer. The better the total package, the more likely they will attract the best people.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:37 PM
2

Fuck, really?? I never get sick, so you don't deserve sick days. I don't take vacations, so you don't deserve vacation pay. People's pathetic need to have everything be 100% fair for all or nothing means nobody gets anything. Stop being so damn selfish.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:31 PM
5

The lack of male teachers is really a huge problem. She's actually hit the nail right on the head with this one.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:29 AM
3

No true Scotsman. It's so glaringly obvious too...
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:18 AM
7

Or, you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:16 AM
1

Don't forget notarized!
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:15 AM
9

Right. I don't think anyone is claiming rape doesn't exist. Just please stop blaming and alienating an entire gender, the vast majority of such consider rape abhorrent?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:14 AM
8

Like Marie Antoinette's (refutably quoted to her) "Let them eat cake" When told the peasants were starving, these people are so self righteous and entitled they have become completely detached from reality..
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:12 AM
13

He probably just saw "straw man argument" on that logical fallacy infographic that pops up on reddit every couple of months. Probably should have read the definition though..
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:06 AM
1

About as well as to be expected, which is not at all. The goal isn't to convince them, that's not possible. Proof against their position is brushed off as conspiracy and thus, proof FOR their position. Which is ludicrous.. But that's to be expected from crazy people. It's more to convince other, more rational people that are listening in and undecided. To make sure that was is being shouted and chanted by these hypocrites is called out for what it is.. lies and hatred.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:14 PM
2

I try every day to be a good, supportive and loving man to my lady, to my daughter, my family and friends. I stand up for what I believe in and I make my voice heard when people put down any gender, race, etc. Be exactly what they say you are not, how can they look anything but foolish?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:38 AM
3

Well, no. They need to be fought with logic and with truth. Ignoring them doesn't make them go away, in fact it mostly makes things worse. Every woman in my life has a deep respect for both genders. In fact I don't think I've ever even met a true man-hating feminist. But they are out there, and they are LOUD. We have every right to be proud of ourselves and enjoy being who we are, and have every right to push back just as hard as they try to push us. I don't think men have ever really made a sin…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:31 AM
1

"Am I evil? Yes I am. Am I evil, I am man, yes I am." First thing I though of when I read your comment. Fitting? http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-u-HCHCuHMg
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:17 PM
3

slow clap
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:22 AM
4

the vast majority of occupational deaths occur among men. 93% of deaths on the job involved men. 11 times higher than women.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:18 AM
7

Dude... I'm 32, just had my first kid a month ago and I don't even feel ready for this, haha. Props to you for doing it at 18. Also, for braving the death glares in order to take your kid to the park. You sound alright.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 02:08 PM
4

I hope you aren't implying occasional cigarette smoking does not increase the risk of cancer over non smoking. And the notion that cigarettes are cheap is a bit of a stretch on any level..
/r/seduction21/12/14 02:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter