TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

um_ya Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by um_ya on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
62

They want the same stuff without putting in the same effort. Imagine having a class full of students and you told the class that your grade will depend on the classes average grade. Students that got F's on all their tests won't try any harder, because they'll get a better grade regardless. Students with A's won't try harder either because they'll get a C regardless. What's the point of working hard, if you don't actually achieve anything?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:38 PM
15

Not to mention the fact that if any of these feminists actually passed any legislation forcing employers to pay women more than they're valued in the market, then people simply won't hire them at all. Feminists are destructive to women.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:22 PM
26

I heard it's fashionable, among the left, to be Muslim. She probably switched religions when it was convenient to be oppressed for being Jewish.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/18 04:10 AM
42

The reason I know their whole movement is bullshit, is because they defend the shit happening in Islam... They choose to bitch about micro bullshit in the US while completely ignoring the things happening in these middle eastern countries. Sad.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:46 AM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:34 PM
108

Source for the uninitiated
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/18 06:36 PM
13

The media hardly reports it, but this kind of stuff has been going on the whole election cycle.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:12 PM
1

Notice how everything feminism stands for today, requires a male to do something for them, and nothing for a woman to do for herself.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/17 01:26 AM
24

In a perfect world, employment would straiten them out. An employer would not accept this kind of behavior... But, more likely than not, they're getting a check from the government. They're behavior won't be corrected until they face the negative consequences of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 06:27 AM
4

NSA should start selling their services...
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/17 06:54 AM
1

Yes, a businessman should have the freedom to hire and fire whoever they like, based on whatever reasons they choose. If not, then you're putting a third party between you and your employees, which means you might be forced to hire someone you don't want. If an employer doesn't hire gay people or minorities, it's the managers loss if customers or quality employees decide to go else where. In a free market, an employee should be able to choose where they want to work and an employer should be abl…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:02 PM
3

How does the advertisement help their company though? Who are they targeting with this advertisement, if not woman workers? Seems like destructive virtue signaling to me... Unless it's a bunch of woman in the marketing department who thought this crap up.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 09:07 AM
9

And if people don't treat you fairly for XYZ reason, that makes it harder. An employers purpose is not to feed you and your family, an employers purpose is to provide quality products/services to their customers. Labor is an expense and not a privilege to be handed out by third parties. The more gender/race specific laws the government comes up with, the more reasons not to hire minorities and woman, because it's a lawsuit waiting to blow up in the company's face.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 09:00 AM
9

"Oh terrific! Here's 30 scholarships and a full ride playing lacrosse."
/r/MensRights15/02/17 08:54 AM
177

Gender studies requirements: - Fat - Colored hair (red, blue, green) - Black thick rimmed glasses - Fish mouth Example
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/16 09:12 PM
2

You sir, are politically incorrect. Let me go grab your coat, and welcome you to the family. Trump is the SJW bitch slapping god king.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 02:48 PM
61

This is from reason.com which is a libertarian media source. They are professional about what they report, because they respect their reader's intelligence.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 03:37 AM
2

Is there a link to the whole video?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 03:29 AM
1

Link to said device
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:51 PM
4

Feminism is like a religion. Her arguments were not original thoughts and just sounded like she was reciting phrases from the feminist religion. She had no response to what he had to say, because she didn't know how to defend here own opinion. Once she couldn't come up with an argument to dispute him, she resorted to FEELINGS. She resorted to emotional appeal as a way to maintain her belief system (similar tactic religious people use). It's really quite sad.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 05:28 AM
1

hey, you're not deadpool
/r/MensRights30/12/15 06:39 PM
2

guaranteed result vs. guaranteed opportunity I think the phrase you were looking for was "equal opportunity vs equal outcome"
/r/MensRights27/12/15 12:03 AM
1

definition: believing in equality between both genders I just looked up the definition of feminism on the internet. "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men." Feminism is not about equality, it's about supremacy.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/15 03:54 PM
0

It's the 20th century, why don't you have an adblocker?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:27 AM
4

She's an equal-opportunity lunatic. You probably mean to say "equal-outcome lunatic". Equal-opportunity is fine, but equal-outcome is bad.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:08 AM
-1

I disagree. I'd be happy to pay a bit extra in taxes to guarantee free education or healthcare. Even if Bernie Sanders had completely good intentions and he wasn't corrupt in how it was run, there is no guarantee that the next candidate (or some policy) would ensure that it didn't become a monopoly on the business in that sector. Remember, the road to serfdom is paved with good intentions. EDIT: Also, it's kind of ironic "I'd be happy to pay a bit extra in taxes to guarantee free education or he…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:21 AM
2

Bernie Sanders entire voter base thinks they're getting something from nothing. He's promising free education, free healthcare, ect. but he still hasn't explained how he's going to pay for it. He hasn't produced a single plan on how he's going to pay for the crap he's promising, short of "tax the rich more". It's easy to make promises but its hard to follow through, and Bernie will make promises to every single group he can (black lives matter, feminists, students and their loans, elderly and th…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:10 AM
6

I stopped liking him after he promised free education, free healthcare, free [insert entitlement]. It's easy to tell people what they want to hear, it's hard to tell them what they should hear.... He's popular because people think they're getting something from nothing, or something from somebody else. Now try telling his supporters that everything he is promising is coming out of their own pocket and they'd change their tone.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:52 AM
1

Great, you just pointed out my point. The U.S. pays a lot of government money on healthcare. It still doesn't address the point that replacing one government program with another government program still isn't fixing the problem. Good luck finding any sense in Bernie Sanders plan other than "taxing the rich more", which ironically admits that the cost will be higher than it is now.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:14 PM
1

I'm tired of arguing this with you, I pointed out several times that IT IS NOT SAVING US MONEY. How many ways to I have to say that MORE GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE SOLUTION. To replace one government program with another government program still isn't fixing the problem. In the end, innovation will find the country that welcomes it. That country will not be the United States. Thanks for doing your part.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:00 PM
1

So you've been told it works in other countries but you don't fully understand why, do you? The program doesn't work, it is payed by debt. The countries that have these giant social programs are ALL in HUGE debt. Debt is the process of pulling future consumption to be used in the present. It is not a zero sum game, because future generations pay the cost. The problem is differed but not gone. There is absolutely no way to pay for these programs without paying for it by going deeper into debt. No…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:02 PM
1

As much as I would love people to have free healthcare, free education, ect. I'm also a realist and don't take these people's promises on face value. The economics doesn't support their promises, so I don't pretend it will work. I don't want a politician governing my life. Unfortunately the ones that vote are always the ones that want to use politics to enforce rules onto somebody else. If you think your system is sustainable, then create a company that acts in the way that the government works.…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:35 PM
1

When I say not average I mean that the government covers a variety of health problems but doesn't cover edge cases. When you have a universal healthcare system, the health of the many outweighs the health of the individual. This means the patients health isn't in the highest interest, its the average health of the people in the United States. If you don't control the checkbook, then you don't control the treatment. If a hospital doesn't get paid for treating edge cases, then they don't spend the…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:33 PM
0

The point I was making with housing and food, is that those are necessities too, but I don't see you screaming about that being a problem. It's funny how you can see universal healthcare as a good idea, but don't think universal housing or universal food distribution is a good idea. By your logic, healthcare is a necessity therefore universal healthcare is good, but universal housing and universal food programs are bad because those are somehow not necessary in the same way? I would say healthca…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:33 PM
1

Several things that need to be addressed here, they are more fundamental to understanding the economics. If you think the United States is a prime example of what capitalism is, then you're wrong. The United States may be labeled as capitalist, but we have by far the most regulations in the world (both social and business). The only industry that is thriving here in the United States, is internet businesses. An internet business has low barriers to entry, no regulation, no unions, no long term c…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:37 PM
0

Universal healthcare is no exception to the laws of economics. The United States has heavy regulations on health care, and patent law prevents companies from creating competitive products to compete with existing products. The reason why the internet has been the main source of innovation over the past 30 years, is because there is no patent laws or regulations to worry about. Low barriers to entry and low risk of failure is what we need, and you don't get that with a single payer system. Innova…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:15 PM
2

Well, its hard to believe somebody that promises free healthcare, free college education, full social security benefits, ect... His magic plan to achieve all this, is to just tax the rich. He completely lacks economic understanding, and its popular because people think they're getting something for nothing.... If he said YOU had to pay for it, would you still support him the way you do? What he's promising easily exceeds whats fathomably possible, and people are going to get disappointed if he b…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:44 AM
1

"Universal healthcare just makes financial sense" The difference being the government pays, rather than the customer. You'll be paying the same amount (usually more), it just doesn't show up on the price tag. So just to be clear, no it doesn't make financial sense. I can't imagine lobbying be an issue either. -__-
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:25 AM
0

It's hard to believe somebody that promises free healthcare, free education, free [insert entitlement here]... When questioned on how he would achieve this, his only response is to tax the rich more. You can call him whatever you want, but I'm going to call him what he is. He's either a liar or truly economically ignorant.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:19 AM
3

Wow, this actually sounds pretty effective.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:57 PM
12

It takes a really fucked up personality to take somebody else's money and not feel some level of guilt. I suppose you have to be pretty entitled and self centered to think that you "deserve" somebody else's belongings... If I were a female, I would just want to get the divorce over with and move on with my life, but some of these woman continue to destroy somebody else's life well beyond the divorce. I have no respect for those kind of people.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 07:28 AM
1

If it was up to Paul Krugman, the government would give everybody "free money". Krugman thinks government debt is different than personal debt because the government can print money. I don't know why people eat his shit up so much... Probably because it's what they want to hear.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:24 PM
6

Maybe we should have a law that makes it easier for woman to grill in their back yard... Perhaps make it a requirement that men pay 30% more for BBQs and patties. /s
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:46 PM
3

https://i.imgur.com/Pek9xfy.jpg
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:26 AM
3

Snow sticks are used to know where to plow when there's snow on the ground... This ladies ignorance is impalpable.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:25 PM
3

Telling people what it is, is more helpful than just saying it exists... go to adblock plus "filter preferences" uncheck the check box at the bottom "Allow some non-intrusive ads"
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:24 AM
6

You failed to mention the commercial that said "sorry, its a boy"
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:31 PM
1

... Can you still even, though?
/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:02 AM
7

No, I think that makes you 2n not n2
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:32 PM
9

This is probably the best analogy.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:27 PM
5

I can't believe the gender pay gap is still argued... I'm a business man and I don't give a shit who I hire, as long as they're productive and bring in more money than they cost. If women can be hired at a cheaper price for the same amount of work, then supply and demand takes over. If I can pay a women $0.70 to every man $1, then I would be hiring all women! In reality, men seem to be more selfless about work load and hours.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:41 AM
3

I don't mean to defend or accuse anyone, but am I the only one that finds it odd that the rapist agreed to have dinner with the father at the same house that he raped the daughter?... Who just has dinner with a random medicine supplier? And why would the medicine supplier agree?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter