TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

unbannable9412 Archive

View 9 posts and 1,508 comments by unbannable9412 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,508 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Not really the same. Downs syndrome is a disability that will lessen the quality of life of both the child and parent(most parents of disabled children might not admit it openly, but it is hard), not to say that you should abort a baby just because it may have a slight mental handicap. But doing so as compared to the reason being they don't have the right genitals just does not work.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:07 PM
2

appeal from emotion. Don't talk about fallacies if you don't even know how they work. Let me help, seeing as how you're totally incompetent. Eugenics - the science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics. Aborting fetuses with undesirable traits(in this case male) falls smack fucking dab in that category. She is not a woman who had an abortion, she is a bigot who just fucking committed a crime against humanity and t…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:52 AM
1

hows is an abortion done because its a boy and an abortion done because a woman cant afford the kid any different. they aren't. Uh yea they are, and I just explained why. What she did is nothing but a personal form of eugenics. It's entirely different from aborting a fetus the mother is unable to take care of. Her body her choice doesn't even begin to factor in when she's taking notes from hitler.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:40 AM
1

Eugnics isn't a right, there was sort of a major disagreement on that line of thought in the previous century...
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:04 AM
15

Eugenics would probably be more appropriate. The phrase feminazi and seemingly non-chalant comparison of feminists to nazis doesn't seem so outlandish anymore, huh... Also still amazed this is real, this has been posted once before and I assumed it was just blog click bait trash, or just yet another teen/college aged tumblrite cunt making shit up to fill the void of inattention from their parents, but no, it actually happened...a-fucking-mazing.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:01 AM
-1

Those would be the studio majors who never networked in order to get their name out there and because of as much never get to do shows or exhibitions, in short they didn't pay attention during their art seminar class. Art ed majors are essentially teachers, and graphic design majors tend to have regular work.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:01 PM
7

What about charging more for arts majors because they clearly dont care about throwing away their money/ their parents money! Art is hardly a waste of time or money.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:27 PM
-1

It's not even the falseness of the narrative, it's the overplayed cliche bake sale crap. Are feminists across the nation really so uncreative?
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:25 PM
5

Incredible difference between the two. Genocide and war crimes, of which evidence is much harder to erase or lose, or he said she said many years after the fact.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 11:09 PM
7

How the fuck does her "depression" even relate at all to raping someone??
/r/MensRights23/11/14 08:54 AM
1

Strictly speaking, rape is perfectly normal, as is murder. I'm not saying people should be thought controlled for finding teenagers sexually attractive, but there's little thing humans have called reason that would tell us some over the hill adult has no business shacking up with someone who can't even drive yet.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 02:59 AM
2

You can make this bigoted little analogy for any group of people, and it always sounds, childish, shallow, and asinine. People are people, they're not colored chocolate candies, they happen to be a bit more complex than that, go figure.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:28 AM
11

Easy scapegoat. People have always look to different mediums of entertainment as a scapegoat for their soapbox issue, be it "wild teenagers", school shootings, or the boogeyman that is 'misogyny'.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:23 PM
4

My god...that manipulative cunt actually got on tv? This is what happens when you don't let idiots who act like idiots fade into obscurity and just keep talking up their stupidity.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:13 PM
4

Fine, in return she has to be submissive and cater to my whims. Also, if she hits me, I can beat her mercilessly with no repercussion. We're doing this old school right? What an absolute tool.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 08:09 AM
8

I honestly can't think of anything much lower than using children as propaganda tools for your own beliefs, further having them do something that in any other situation you would scold them for. But then feminists are great at setting new lows.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:56 PM
2

The practice is something to be ashamed of. No one should be ashamed of being a victim of said practice, who is saying this?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 10:18 PM
0

Good for you, what is the point of your comment? Some sort of roundabout condonement of MGM? Because whether you mean it that way or not, it is. Even if circumcision had no later adverse affects(hint it does, and chances are you have them and just don't realize it) it doesn't justify forcibly mutilating the genitals of a new born.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:27 PM
3

Name calling is usually a response when someone cannot infuse enough logic into the conversation. Ad hominem is when an argument is nothing but the sum of a personal attack, my calling you fucking sick is just the cherry on the shit sundae that is conversing with a subhuman piece of shit like you. Get run over by a car.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:38 AM
3

hatred. Well you did get one thing right, I do fucking hate you. I hate the guts of any person who wantonly and openly condones such grotesque human rights violations. Further, I didn't change the meaning of anything. People like you invented the word 'circumcision' so a few decades after the fact when a man comes to his doc asking why his dick is hairy, he has a skin bridge, he doesn't become erect like he should, or why it is that his dick is different from the majority of every other man in t…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:37 AM
3

You're confusing ignorance and acceptance with reason and prudence. You are talking about condoning the mutilating of the genitals of new born infants, and for what? Aesthetic, tradition, psuedo-medical science? You're fucking sick.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:30 AM
3

I didn't say it was the same thing, it is however of the same nature. Inflicting harm on children on the basis of "well they're mine". I would say 'nice try', but that mental backflip you did to try to turn what I said back on me was pathetic and tired. Any reasonable and prudent person would prefer to have circumsion over being killed. Any reasonable and prudent person would prefer to not be sexually mutilated at all, just the same doing it to others. What the everliving fuck is the matter with…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:29 AM
3

Paraphrasing what you said dipshit.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:28 AM
2

Angstiest thing I've ever read.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:56 PM
4

I don't support child abuse, but I do support abusing the rights of a child through violently mutilating their genitals after they're born. ............right....
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:54 PM
3

It's also my choice to drown my kids in the bathtub if I feel like it to. Doesn't make it right, doesn't mean it should be legal.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:54 PM
5

Insecurity about their own mutilated genitals, ignorance, obstinate adherence to tradition, or the more petty and disgusting "it looks better". There are a rare few among the pro circ advocates who are also fetishists of circumcision and either take some sort of sick pleasure in mutilating young baby boys, or relating back to the "it looks good" bunch prefer circumcised penises. Which if you don't want to sleep with someone whose uncircumcised, by all means, don't. No one is saying you have to l…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:53 PM
28

I always love this comic regardless of what it's been edited too. Anyone know the original?
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:58 AM
6

I know alot of you will get pissed and say, "see feminists do hate men". But here let me explain, by talking about how men are victims of violence just as often, sometimes more so, you're distracting from the real issue Violence Against Women™. Feminism is for everyone™, guys. ^^^^^^^^^^^<sup>sarcasm</sup>
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:31 PM
3

Obviously you're yourself sovereign in deciding what constitutes assault and not, but it's best not to play into that narrative as it opens up the door on the whole idea of things having been normalized. And your train of thought opens the door on the idea that it's okay to make someone out to be a victim even when they insist they're not.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:47 PM
1

Elam despite his own boisterous claims does not speak for all of us, neither are all of us supporters of men's rights or the MRM because we were routinely and cruelly burned by women all our lives until we were jaded. Also, that situation you mentioned when women get outraged over campaigns placing onus on them to prevent sexual abuse, are told they're essentially strapping dollar bills to themselves and strutting down a neighbourhood with high theft rates. And a FATHER being in the FAMILY ROOM,…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:45 PM
8

The mere fact that the woman depicted in the statue has never considered it assault or that she's a victim makes it all moot anyway. But that won't stop feminists from turning her into some kind of martyr.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:24 PM
10

Killing someone and cannibalizing them is distinctly different from an unexpected kiss. Legally there is no such thing as consensual murder(unless you count assisted suicide, which even then few places consider as much legal).
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:23 PM
4

Unfortunately it's not a non-issue, or rather if we treat it as such feminists will make no bones about further degrading the meaning of sexual assault should we just ignore their attempts at doing so.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:18 PM
1

It's not just women, and if you want a why, it's because years of feminist propaganda painting all abusers and sexual criminals as male has tainted the psyche of the mainstream. Most people have to actively imagine that women could be as dangerous to children as men despite the fact most child abuse is committed by women.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:09 PM
1

What do you mean? Now, I'm not saying men shouldn't be allowed to sit in the family lounge, but he knew very well what kind of attention he'd garner by doing that. I'm not saying niggers shouldn't be allowed to sit in the diner, but he knew very well what kind of attention he'd garner by doing that. Naturally one of these is objectively worse than the other(most of the time anyway), but it just goes to show how asinine your train of thought is.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:06 PM
10

It sounds to me that your relationship is reciprocal in it's abuseiveness. "asking to be alone" "responding by assaulting them and destroying their property" Clearly he is an abusive bastard. Admittedly "he takes his depression out on me" is a bit vague, but given that her example of as much is him asking to be alone, you have no basis to be saying this. She is the abuser, not the depressed boyfriend with bruises on his face and a wrecked kitchen. Him being emotionally/verbally, you being physic…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:52 PM
27

If he had called the cops on me I don't know what the penalty would have been... I probably would have been charged No you wouldn't have, he would have been. Or that's typically the case when the man calls the cops. You did a little more than just get angry and break his shit. You abused power over him. You can break his shit and hit him just about all you want with little to no consequence. The very fact that he restrained you in your childish little outburst is enough to warrant serious charge…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:39 PM
1

raises hand Yes, frozensalad. Can I change my previous answer, going by the women in this class, I'd say I have no respect for women. Is what you should have said. In any case this is just yet another example of female in group bias, aka gurrrl powurr being demonstrated by "strong, independent women".
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:57 AM
-1

What's the difference between manslaughter and murder then? Between differing degrees of murder? You can't really accidentally rape someone as far as I can understand.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:05 AM
-1

Rape is a crime that, short of witnesses who just sat and watched, is only a crime that is undifferentiated from not being a crime by the state of mind of one of the parties involved. In other words the differnece between sex and rape is the abstraction of consent. You cannot touch, or measure consent. A mangled bloody body from a murder investigation on the other hand is entirely different, there is no such thing as consensual murder.(well there sorta is, but it's known by another name for deat…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:00 AM
2

God forbid women take responsibility in their own safety. "hey, you know if you go into that bad neighborhood you might get mugged" "OMFG YOU VICTIM BLAMING SHITLORD" You don't tell men not to rape women because men don't rape women, rapists rape women, rapists happen to also rape men too, not that such people this rant is directed at really even care though. The terms rape/rapist/raped etc, being synonymous in their minds with men and maleness is no different than people who think of a thief or…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:31 AM
1

"friend"
/r/MensRights05/09/14 11:28 PM
3

...but it's a lingerie company... It's like getting mad that a sweater company asked people to model sweaters. Further proof feminists live in their own little world of delusional stupidity, the evidence is mounting day by day. Tendency to be an ideologue oughta be officially added to the DSM as a mental defect.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:21 PM
4

Burying your head in the sand won't change the fact that marriage(more specifically divorce) is a crapshoot of ruining your life if you're a man.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:05 PM
9

violent Stop misusing that word for the sake of your own histrionics.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:30 PM
125

"...but but..you don't understand, IT'S SATIRE SHITLORD!!" There's really only one thing that disgusts me more than bigots, it's dishonest people. If you're a hateful bigoted shithead, but honest about it at the very least.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:38 AM
2

Oh you're so right, it's not as though repeated messages coupled with a history of actions spell out any meaning, especially if it's hateful and malicious. Get fucking real. This is just yet another example of feminists saying one thing and doing another, further hypocrisy, and further misandry. I thought about comparing Valenti and her fellow feminist ilk to racists, but the thing is atleast racists are honest, they despise people not of their own race and make no bones about admitting it, sexi…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 09:45 AM
6

Way to state the obvious dipshit. It's what's written on it contrasted with her hypocritical 2 faced persona.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:31 AM
2

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:11 AM
30

Just your daily reminder: DO NOT FUCKING TALK TO THE POLICE, THEY ARE NOT THERE TO PROTECT OR SERVE YOU, THEY ARE FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, AGAINST YOU. THE END.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:41 AM
1

I'd only advise such a relationship to a man who enjoys masochism, otherwise give any woman acting like this a WIIIIIIIIIIIIIDE berth.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:37 AM
1

Feminism has so thoroughly embedded itself in our collective cultural consciousness, as well as the fact that the majority of major feminist icons are typically women, people honestly believe that if you criticize feminism, this somehow makes you a misogynist. I'm constantly bewildered by the lack of critical thinking necessary to believe an ideology which has only existed for a mere blink of an eye in the totality of human existence has somehow come to represent women.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:08 PM
1

As expected the copy and paste response to criticism of feminism is the old "you don't understand feminism" bit. How typical. I guess we'll just ignore all the major feminist icons who talk about men like they're subhuman or the decades worth of laws and policies put into place by feminism that have dusted male victims and female abusers under the rug. You keep on shoving your head into the sand.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:37 PM
4

From a comment I made and saved a while back. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25fnnf/because_fuck_having_a_real_discussion_from/chh4f24?context=3 The racism, and intolerance that was innate within the suffragette/early feminist movement and their contribution to prohibition. In that same vein the white feather movement. http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/151/the-white-feather-campaign-a-struggle-with-masculinity-during-world-war-i And of course the violence they used to achieve thei…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:37 AM
2

PETA have influence in the world of animal rights, and everyone knows they're a crock of shit. Don't confuse money and real influence. One is based on loyalty and reverence, the other is based on greed. I'm a woman I couldn't care less. I'm for equal rights Good 4 u. There are plenty of women who feel the same. And? That's nice to know not all women are man hating cunts, but I didn't ever suspect most women were. Don't confuse women and feminism. Ovaries don't make you a feminist. Women are a se…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:35 AM
6

Pretty similar actually, except that the KKK didn't rely on state based proxy violence nearly as much. There was a time when US senators and state governors would openly endorse the KKK. Their members would influence laws and social attitudes to harm any non-WASP. Feminism operates in the same toxic, and prejudiced fashion, again minus the gumption to destroy people's lives with their own hands.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:28 AM
5

It is, yes. A person who posts on a blog thread, in the guise of "concern," to disrupt dialogue or undermine morale by pointing out that posters and/or the site may be getting themselves in trouble, usually with an authority or power. They point out problems that don't really exist. The intent is to derail, stifle, control, the dialogue. It is viewed as insincere and condescending. Link You are a troll whose only use intentionally or not is to derail and halt discussion in the MRM. Atleast with …
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:23 AM
1

Why don't we destroy the anti-racist movement too by quoting a bunch of radical idiots bashing white people? Except feminism at it's very core is a hate group, it's based on man hating principles and most popular ideas are all about misandry. The only anti-racist group that even comes close is the black panthers, and despite their gun toting radical ways, I don't think any of them ever called for white people to be exterminated. Never mind the fact that these people are major, influential, and p…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:20 AM
10

And what does this vague little comment even mean? "A lot of people" who is a lot of people? And why do they think they're bullshit? It clearly isn't feminists, or these people wouldn't be such powerful, popular, and influential names in feminist circles.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:27 AM
8

Like asking why a civil rights group discusses the KKK.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:23 AM
-5

First-wave feminism was about equal rights. Even in the MRM I'm amazed to see this shit passed around as fact. Suffragettes were man hating cunts the same as any toxic shocked rad fem angrily writing on her blog today. The difference being suffragettes actually had the gumption to get off their fatasses and do something, typically hypocritical or violent, naturally they paired well with the typically white washed, racist, and hyper-religious prohibitionists. Between death threats, hypocritical v…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:23 AM
8

That's like saying opposing the KKK makes things harder on white people. It's disgustingly ignorant. And "radicals on both sides", fucking HA! You can tout that little petty argument when you can find me MRAs advocating female genocide, and talking about women like nazis talk about jews, there's a reason feminazi exists as a pejorative against feminists.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:19 AM
9

Ah yes, radical feminists. Like social advocates and lawyers "I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- Andrea Dworkin "All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." -- Catherine MacKinnon Authors "I have a great deal of difficulty with the idea of the ideal man. As far as I'm concerned, men are the product of a damaged gene. They pretend to be normal but …
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:17 AM
14

Except for that whole feminism causing men to face social issues, if not making them worse. But of course that wouldn't be so bad if they didn't lie to your face at every turn claiming "feminism fights for men too/feminism is for everybody". Fact of the matter is, feminism stands directly in the way of goals of achieving equality. And who are you to talk about trolls? All you're doing is concern trolling.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:08 AM
14

Feminism is steadily becoming less and less popular, even celebrities have recently started refusing to identify with feminism. So, no, that argument doesn't really go anywhere. Just the same, popularity does not make right. Feminism is intrinsically anti-equality, always has been. Of course that won't stop people from pretending lawyers, social advocates, authors, etc who all speak in the name of feminism and say things like "All men are rapists and that's all they are" -- Marilyn French This i…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:06 AM
1

That's because they're not 'rules'. They're excuses for women to abuse men, and men being told to shut up and take it.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:36 AM
1

The concept of fairness is something taught and learned as early as people are able to understand such a concept. A concept of fairness might even be innate to human understandings, so then tell me sir knight of pure white, how do you reconcile this little hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:35 AM
1

Quit your fucking concern trolling. Acting like this your just playing into the hands of those bigoted against men and opposed to men's rights. She's a prejudiced bitch who has no right harassing men for looking after children. People like her should not be tolerated even a little.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:31 PM
1

She's a bitch. Bitch, literally meaning a female dog, is a common slang term in the English language, especially used as a denigrating term applied to a person, commonly a woman. It often refers to someone who is belligerent, unreasonable, malicious, rudely intrusive, and/or aggressive. This woman literally fits the definition to a T.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:30 PM
8

Indifference. Men and boys face relatively as many, maybe more, maybe less(hard to say due to the effect of indifference to men) issues as women. And to a degree everyone is aware of it, but doesn't care. People know men are abused and discriminated against, but accept it as men's role as a target of abuse, or just ignore it. "You're a man, so suck it up/man up" Merely showing as much compassion to men as you would women makes a hell of alot of difference.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:25 PM
2

Not at all. People like his ex are purely toxic human beings who have no business around growing children. Children are very impressionable, alot of what sets the stage for who they are as adults comes from their experiences as a child. The second she started teaching her that she should assault any boy who simply gets too close she had ZERO right to have anything to do with that child as a parent. No mother in her life is a helluva lot better than a mother who does nothing but pass on bigotry.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:21 PM
-2

People like your ex are bonafide psychopaths to the truest sense of the word. I can only hope as time goes by more people recognize feminist/sjw insanity for what it is. A kind of collective cult-like bigotry and hatred codified into rhetoric and thought, and to think colleges and universities across the world even are churning these people out of their "women's studies" departments. I sincerely hope nothing your crazy bitch of an ex taught your daughter sticks. People like her have no business …
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:18 PM
6

So running away with your tail between your legs then? K
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:49 AM
3

Self-aggrandizing as some 'woe is me' caricature of a victim is innately typical of feminists. Walk a mile in another person's shoes sometime.... Irony.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:13 PM
0

We call it men's rights because if we didn't feminists would co-opt it and ooze into it like the viscous, and caustic human slime that they are and further erode the rights of men as they have been doing for decades. Just as they've done with every other rights related cause out there.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:36 PM
-6

"ooh waahh, you said shallow mean things" She's roundly(lol) awful. Mind, and body, this woman is just repugnant. It's considered polite to not be so insultingly shallow, she isn't deserving of as much.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:33 PM
-9

No kidding, everything about her is awful.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:32 PM
-16

It's considered polite to pull punches, but I won't because fuck these kinds of people. So fat ugly Lowly employed(not that there's anything inherently wrong with that, but given this person, there's a good chance they'll be working that or a similar job 10 years from now too) unintelligent bigoted obscenely obnoxious Frankly there's nothing about this person that isn't repugnant. So, this is what I have to say. LOL, what a sad, and pathetic waste of human resources.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:31 PM
3

As far as dress goes, formal and informal, currently women have considerably more options and freedom in that area than men do.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:42 AM
1

Ah, I misunderstood.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:44 AM
1

Aborting an unborn child merely because it posses natural traits that you don't like(skin color, sex, etc) is nothing but eugenics on an individual level. It's fucking sick.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:59 AM
2

One of them was black, guess that means any black person's opinion on these issues is null too. One of them is overweight too, guess that rules out the obese. Most of them are balding, so therefore anyone losing hair as well. Let's see... Oh, two of them are wearing glasses. Feminists sure are an open minded bunch.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:53 AM
0

I would think such a remark is merely commentary on 'the most dangerous animal' which means women to as a given, but this was said by a biological anthropologist. So...
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:47 AM
3

It's best not to levy accusations of bigotry at people when you're too ignorant to even know what they're talking about. I think this just kinda proves you don't have as strong a grasp on the current culture of japan as you would like to believe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbivore_men and you enforce gender roles by saying that masculine women and feminine men are unattractive and that anyone who thinks otherwise is "an extreme anomaly". No one is enforcing anything. That is an observation y…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:28 AM
6

It's like that in Japan. If your only interaction with the facets of japanese culture is anime. sure
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:26 AM
5

Freedom of speech doesn't include the right to scream your opinion in people's faces. Which makes feminists getting pissed about this all the more hilariously hypocritical.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 12:19 AM
2

I really don't have alot of faith in women's ability to empathize with men. The very nature of this pathetic little comic strip proves that. It's just feminist rhetoric about patriarchy theory rebranded with some feel good overtones.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 12:15 AM
1

Put spaces between your paragraphs.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 08:12 AM
3

That is because we've routinely had feminists and other anti-men's rights shills come here, make seemingly benign self-posts, and later edit them to the effect of misrepresenting and making us look bad. So it's really not fair, at all. But that's why there's an explanation with each archive bot post. http://www.reddit.com/r/MRSelfPostCopies/comments/q8y0u/meta_faq/
/r/MensRights28/06/14 08:11 AM
3

Why is there constant mention of women thinking all men are rapists? Feminists think that. Women only think as much as a consequence of absorbing feminist rhetoric.(and some traditional social ideas as well, but ultimately feminism is traditionalism in panties and lipstick, thank you gww for that phrase) On a fundamental, or blank slate if you will, level I'm not totally sure how women generally feel about men. Sometimes I think most women see the men in their lives only as tools to an end, much…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 08:09 AM
0

"Dance for the treat, dance for the treat!" "good man" If you do this, you're pathetic, the only person more despicable than you is the woman dangling you like a yo yo by your dick.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:52 AM
5

It bugs the shit out of me thinking about how I was circumcised and that I'll never get back what was taken from me, but I was a baby at the time, new born in fact. I can't imagine the emotional hell you went through.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:49 AM
8

Breeding. There is no flour or eggs involved. But yes.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:45 AM
6

obese people have a difficult time controlling their emotions, and their hormones are out of whack due to the relationship between estrogen levels and adipose tissue. they are prone to be emotionally imbalanced and cannot be trusted to have a valid interpretation of reality. It helps when you make a troll post not to put the most outlandish and retarded things first, you gotta reel people in.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 02:32 AM
2

Except the key difference remains, we have not intentionally, not even unintentionally trampled the rights of women in our efforts. We haven't exercised any undue influence or power to hide female rape victims and male abusers, we haven't pulled fire alarms and blocked exit doors at feminist lectures, we don't go to their rallies/meetings/what ever and tell them they're human scum, we don't send death threats trying to force their hosts to shut down their meetings, etc. Feminism is not about wom…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:48 PM
-2

Charity is for the deserving. I suggest we kill Isaac Brock. Kill all rapists, amirite??
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:40 PM
1

So basically they explained what history has already taught us? The high woman on the totem pole always shits on the man on the bottom of that totem pole. Always has.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:12 PM
4

The idea that the "original notion of feminism" was benevolent is a dangerous myth. Hell some suffragettes were no different from terrorists, happy to use violence to achieve their goals.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:48 PM
7

Ultimately I find it hard to lay blame on men like that for that behavior. He might have been a hardass stoic by nature, or more likely everytime he showed any hint of emotion that wasn't anger throughout his life society put him in his place, likely via shame. Pretty much every single man has been there once atleast.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:46 PM
0

Furthermore the overwhelming opinion that feminism should be abolished here is hypocritical and childish. Yea, what would make MRAs feel that way...maybe death threats, thuggish "protest" tactics like pulling fire alarms and blocking doors, or maybe feminists talking about men like a nazi talks about jews. I wonder why anyone here feels that way...
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:20 PM
2

I propose a new rule that anytime a comment says "this isn't a men's rights issue" if it isn't accompanied by an argument or explanation the person who said it should be permanently banned asap.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:08 PM
1

An association would imply organization and coherence. We unfortunately don't have alot of that.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:07 PM
219

I don't think this Pope has said one single thing that I didn't like.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:37 PM
3

If feminists didn't want to be compared to nazis, maybe they shouldn't say things that make them sound like nazis. "If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." --Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001. "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Ge…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:52 PM
2

Then maybe you need to pay better attention, because it happens every single time.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:48 PM
1

But I think the MRM would have much more traction if it didn't blame all of the issues men face on feminism. We'd have a little more traction if feminism didn't cause and make so many issues men face worse by intentionally ignoring male victims and female abusers, we'd also have a little more traction if they'd stop slandering us and sending death threats, pulling fire alarms, and screaming in people's faces that they're scum every time we decide to meet offline. So in a nut shell, go fuck yours…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:17 PM
1

Isn't it just basically a red herring, simple as that?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 07:32 PM
9

The "it's not the same because it's worse" argument is a red herring, and ultimately is made by people who don't understand why GM of any kind is opposed, and is at the same time a man hating fuckstain who is simply attempting to undermine concern for men's issues.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 07:31 PM
-3

Ooh, oh my god. SOMEONE CALL THE OPPRESSION COMISSION, YOU WON THE OPPRESSION OLYMPICS. YOU'RE A CHAMPION!!
/r/MensRights20/06/14 07:30 PM
5

You're spouting rhetoric and opinion, not fact.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 05:51 PM
2

I actually recall back in highschool when I played football a couple guys thought nothing of jokingly resting their balls on your shoulder when you weren't paying attention. You could get away with that in the locker room. If they had done that to any girls, chances are they'd still be in prison right now.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:40 PM
3

I think what they mean, is it's the difference between someone who jumps at every chance to fuck someone...or something... without a second thought, not even to their own sexual health or repercussions depending on who they're fucking. Versus say someone who regularly attends orgies, but didn't just do so on a whim.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:39 PM
17

Bodily integrity and autonomy are not "weak" issues. Especially not for men.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:20 PM
4

Wow...that had not occurred to me before. Funny you mention it though. Since they both rise from socially marxist attitudes. The whole "us vs them" the "oppressed versus the oppressors". Naturally all of it revolving around some twisted sense or morality, the right(oppressed) the wrong(the oppressors). Communist or feminist dogma, this tactic seems tailor made to creating a facade of victimization to justify unjust power grabs.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:39 AM
2

Tell her the same. She's the one who gets insecure when it's pointed out that the other sex suffers too, she's the one playing a game of oppression olympics.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 09:53 PM
0

I also noticed there were people who took my openness about my situation as an opportunity to claim I embodied all kinds of negative stereotypes. but I feel like there are certain negative aspects infiltrating my mind in a way that seems unhealthy. I'm feeling like my loving boyfriend is the enemy. There is no balance. It's all or nothing. All men are enemies. But how could this be when so many of them are much more sensitive than I am? I'm very much in love with him but sometimes I get so afrai…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:59 PM
2

In this area, not really. I don't think you grasp the extent to which men are expected to suffer and just deal with it, the mere existence and prevalence of 'man up' and other various forms of machismo is testament to that, not counting the non-existence of abuse services for men, or atleast none that don't try to "teach men not to rape/abuse" instead of actually seeing them as human beings.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:05 AM
2

I think I love you.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:53 PM
2

Get over it I was circumcised as a baby and I don't remember it at all. No one circumcised as a baby will remember it so that part of the argument is retarded. They don't remember, therefore it was ok. Speaking of retarded arguments. Secondly not EVERYONE who is circumcised has had horrible side effects or loss of sensation. One dead baby for the sake of some tribal blood ritual is too goddamn many. I will not get over abuse of basic human rights, go fuck yourself dead.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:52 PM
19

Funny thing is I'd consider a circumcision much worse. Tattoos(though not easily or cheaply) can be removed, in fact by the time he's grown it may be easier and cheaper(not justifying it). Once you lose your foreskin, it's gone for good. For now anyway.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:40 PM
3

Fuck their goddamn ass backwards tribal goat herder religion. Holy shit. This is nothing but a fucking barbaric religious blood ritual.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:38 PM
-5

That bitch deserves to die slow.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:36 PM
24

Cases where you have rich men paying exorbitant fees in CS to their exs who have custody is pretty much yet more proof CS is not about children. It's alimony with a "what about the children" sheen to it. Add this to the list along with imprisoning people for not paying.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:26 PM
5

Usually I go on Reddit and read about men who have been married for decades wax poetic on their deep love for their spouses and that balances me out. Then I think about how often my opinions are dismissed, how inaccessible certain parts of society are to me, dating men with no sex drive because they're addicted to porn, being raped, and then the guy who tried to kill me last year. Now imagine that these things happened to you and if you told anyone or tried to openly lament such things you were …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:29 PM
4

Go concern troll else where.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 01:52 AM
7

So basically a woozle?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 01:50 AM
3

When you ruthlessly censor and control the discussion to your liking, equality means whatever you want it to. The fact that equality being a positive word can be brandished like some kind of moral weapon just adds to that.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:01 PM
0

uhh MRAs are atleast morally superior to feminists. To my knowledge no MRA or MRM group is responsible for dusting generations of victims under the rug though abuse of their influence. We also don't send death threats and organize violent 'protests' merely because feminists meet at a specific location to speak amongst themselves. We also have no core theories or concepts universal to MRAs that derides and disregards female victims as unimportant while trying to shift blame for social mores regar…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:33 PM
2

How about this. We'll stop criticizing feminists when they stop SENDING FUCKING DEATH THREATS for merely trying to have our own meetings/speeches. Sound good to you?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:30 AM
0

what the fuck did anything he say have to do with "evil hate movment em arr ayyzz". Quit your fucking trolling or get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:27 AM
3

because half of women prefer cut dicks HOLY SHIT. FUCK WHAT WOMEN LIKE ABOUT MEN HAVING THEIR DICKS FORCIBLY MUTILATED. Wow... Fuck you and die in a fucking house fire you subhuman fuck.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:49 PM
5

Don't bother reasoning with these people who try these pathetic accountability dodges on part of feminism. I've actually seen people claim NOW doesn't represent feminism. No true feminist indeed.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:48 PM
5

What made you think a group of women would be interested in a man's issue? Exactly why I could give a shit less about women's "rights" issues. Women don't deserve rights, who cares about them. Disregarding the snark which I'm sure flew right over your head till you read this. Men's Rights are concerned primarily with how to tackle issues related to inequalities where men are disadvantaged. Feminism is concerned primarily with how to tackle issues related to inequalities where women are disadvant…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:41 PM
7

I would say "and thus an MRA is born". But there are plenty of people even in this sub who've witnessed feminists send death threats for merely holding a differing opinion and still make some sad pathetic attempts to defend feminism.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:40 PM
6

Your mistake was naively assuming feminists give a shit about issues affecting men. At best they don't care, at worst they cause/want to cause them/make them worse. Also what is TH? Keep in mind, this group also talked about th
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:36 PM
3

See if you can find out the name of the nurse from the previous shift and then see if you can find her boss. Raise hell, but try a slightly more gentle but firm approach till you can see your girlfriend.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:02 PM
1

Joints are a waste of good weed.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:00 PM
7

Getting burned by toxic women, in some cases using the law to unfairly screw those men over, has that effect. But then there are also men here smarter than to believe their worth is measured by the number of vaginas they come into contact with, this may come as a shock, but some of us learned through others, or the hard way, a man is not defined by women. So GFY.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:58 AM
3

It's a funny point if that's the case. Since women abuse children more often than men do.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:54 AM
4

Unless it's an older woman and an under age girl, in which case it's good rape. It occurs to me how hilarious it is that feminists coined the term good rape. ...
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:59 PM
18

I say we use this opportunity to force the admin's hand and ban that sub.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:24 AM
5

Naturally arkansas is in every goddamn image. Fuck this humid fucking asshole of a state.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:57 AM
5

I feel the same way. Unlike you though it doesn't quite bother or make me sad so much as piss me off. I just don't know who to be pissed off at. I know if I ever met the doctor who did it I might punch them.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:54 AM
2

could face up to five years in jail or a fine up to $50,000 if convicted. All you discovered is most men don't notice or care they're signed up for SS.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:49 AM
3

I'd rather not hang feminism's wrong doings over women's heads and levy debts against them for all the atrocious things feminism has done to men.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:24 PM
23

The problem is that Feminism does not equal Women. Feminism is a political movement. Something even many MRAs(the "why can't we all just get along" type) can't seem to grasp. The idea that feminism is so untouchable, so linked with women, that in many people's minds without even realizing it, feminism has become women. So even an idea, not necessarily even in opposition to feminism, merely existing is considered an attack on women.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:20 PM
2

Lol why are you being downvoted? This angsty "capitalism is the source of all evil" shit is very typical of feminists.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:33 PM
6

It's basically a way of saying the man without sounding like some beatnik dumbass.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:16 PM
4

You know I generally expect all the "smash the patriarchy, boo capitalism" stuff to be something you see on tumblr, I know even adult feminists tend to share the same mindset, just with fancier wording, but these people look to be in their 30s or so and the sound like some angsty teenage tumblrite. It's actually sad.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:13 PM
23

Meanwhile if you didn't you could face a hefty fine/jailtime and loss to many rights she got automatically. She sounds very thoughtful.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:57 PM
1

I never took women's studies. fooled me, you've got all the right cult programming. We're all hypocrites, put on your big boy pants and accept your fate. lol what does that even mean, was that supposed to be you trying to sidestep your hypocrisy in relation to this argument? If it was it was pathetic. That simply isn't true, which is why your a toxic member of this community (you're a bigot). Even if I were wrong about feminism, being anti-feminist does not make you a bigot. I said that because …
/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:56 PM
6

Oh..boy.. Your comment made my night. Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:11 AM
2

As a feminist, I think the women who you referenced in your copy pasta are bigoted tools. The funny thing is they have more credentials as feminists than you could possibly hope to. I'm sure it is exhausting to have to try to prove to everything that feminists are your enemy, when in reality they're just another group of people. If you spent this much energy trying to create solidarity with feminists, you'd actually be accomplishing something. So basically unless we kowtow to the feminist set of…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:05 AM
2

Bro, maybe you didn't know that I'm a men's rights activist too. is that why you keep posting snarky, glib, "no you're just wrong/miseducated" replies to every post that clashes with your women's studies brainwashing? You can be both, you know that, right? Well no one said you can't be a hypocrite, it'd just be nice if you weren't in denial about it. Men's rights would further propel itself if it learned to create solidarity with feminists to fight certain social struggles. Why exactly should th…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:02 AM
1

Men at the bottom of society don't exist. In fact, the only men who do exist are rich, powerful, white, land owning men. I mean, my gender studies professor taught me those are the only men who exist, so I must be right.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:50 AM
1

0/10 on your trolling efforts btw. Right... I think it's safe to say you're in over your head and now you're just on the defensive.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:48 AM
2

Patriarchy theory on the other hand is the foundation of academic feminism. Feminist theory focuses on analyzing gender inequality. Themes explored in feminism include discrimination, objectification (especially sexual objectification), oppression, patriarchy, stereotyping, art history and contemporary art, and aesthetics. Please educate yourself Hehe...
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:44 AM
3

It gets tiring referencing a sampling of feminism's history of abuse towards men to every head in the sand feminist who bothers to pretend to have an open mind here.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:43 AM
3

Evidence of what? That ideological position and sex are not the same? How about you stop being disingenuous by asking intentionally ambiguous questions. As far as the misandry inherent in feminism, the proof is in the pudding. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27p2jb/yesallwomen_facts_the_media_didnt_tell_you/ci3hvh3?context=3 Though a quick glance at your recent comment history tells me all I need to know though. It doesn't matter how many major feminist organizations work against mal…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:42 AM
1

And unsurprisingly a quick snarky little comment is the response to generations of male victims dusted under the rug and major feminist icons talking about men like they're sub human. God that was shocking. /s You wanna know why the MRM is anti-feminist, now you know why. Because of piece of shit like you.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:39 AM
2

Miseducated is believing feminism is "for equality" when they do and say things like this. No feminist has yet to criticize Mary Koss or the CDC for erasing male rape victims right out of existence via their statistical definition of rape. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2551/male-privilege-defining-male-victims-out-of-existence/ The follow up to the previous. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2798/male-disposability-mary-p-koss-and-influencing-a-government-entity-to-erase-male-victims-of-rape/ http://w…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:35 AM
9

"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience." - Catherine Comins I've actually had feminists tell me that they care about false rape accusations against men. Suffice to say if I could turn bullshit into money I'd be the next J. Paul Getty.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:53 AM
1

They were anti-class dissolution, not necessarily opposed to the social service principles of socialism. Kinda like how in the US we tax, have social security, obamacare, etc, but still have a political disdain for socialism. Or that's my understanding.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:50 AM
6

Oh god...I would honestly love to hear some feminist defend this. I mean it. It'd just be hilarious to see all the mental gymnastics necessary to justify that position.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:35 AM
1

This little cop out doesn't work for ideological positions you can subscribe to or abandon at will. Things like your sex you can't change...or atleast not without alot of drugs, surgery, and time.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:33 AM
1

Doesn't change the fact that the ideology whose flag they're flying at its core is in direct opposition to their message.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:31 AM
1

The nazis were socialists...for germans. So yes they were, and at the same time not.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:24 AM
2

It's funny you say that since the NSDAP were socialists.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:16 PM
5

Your is title is accidentally is.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:04 PM
1

Is the argument that you're making that without a movement for the benefit of women we would still have seen those same scientific advancements implemented the same way and to the same effect? Of course we would have. Modern western liberal ideas about sexuality are not new and do not originate with feminism, even if feminists like to take credit for ideas they simply like.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:58 PM
0

I see a lot more women/feminist HATING stuff here Women and feminism are not the same thing you dullard. This sub could be extraordinarily anti-feminist to a raging fault and it still wouldn't be "misogynistic". But hey, let's just ignore all the awful shit feminists have done to men, and focus on what some internet trolls said in some MRA forum, things that mind you are typically not even remotely as vicious as what the common feminist icon has been quoted as saying. Don't get me wrong there ar…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:20 PM
37

It's a constant theme in feminism and traditionalism. Feminism is traditionalism in a skirt.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:46 PM
2

I'm sorry, but living in an age where a woman is sexually liberated enough to approach me is not detrimental to me as a man nor is it detrimental to men as a whole. A little myopic to think women's sexual liberation is about you don't you think? Lesbians are a thing. You're also pretty foolish to think A) sexuality has changed much besides the openness of it and risks, B) feminism is at all responsible for the sexual liberation of women. The factors that allowed more openness and less risks for …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:59 PM
1

You're a fool and an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:33 PM
1

We don't have to beat feminism, or rather we don't have to try. Feminism's glory days are behind it, it's not a matter of if feminism dies out, but when. Fewer and fewer people are calling themselves feminists and the MRM is becoming more and more relevant, as we do the atrocious things feminism has done to men over the years will come to light, we're seeing more and more young and even older(typically professional of some nature)women turning their backs on that hate filled cultural cult. It's …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:32 PM
1

Are they? I actively have no idea who that politician is other than that he's male and only know him because of that statement. Are you trying to make my argument for me? You just defeated your own point. Same goes for the women related to those quotes. Where are they hailed as icons at? Is it in "mainstream" feminism? Yes, actually, they are. Authors, policy makers, politicians, influential activists, lawyers, people who have an actual measurable effect on feminism and our society. People whose…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:30 PM
1

Not all feminists are evil and not every aspect of feminism is detrimental to men. Not all feminists are evil, just virtually all the ones who matter, and yes every part of feminism is detrimental to men. Sure thing...when they stop conspiring against the rights of men See, this is actively othering feminism as a whole and dehumanizing all those that are a part of it no different than talk of "Rape Culture" does to men. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEoTQB7h3NQ
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:26 PM
1

It's hilarious that your example of "evil men with power oppressing women" is a politician who has yet to live down that idiotic statement. Meanwhile feminists who speak of gendercide are still hailed as icons. Truly, woe is the modern woman LOL.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:06 PM
2

It's not just your narrow worldview Irony.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:05 PM
2

Take your feminism sympathizing and excuse making and blow it your fucking ass. Your understanding of the relationship between the MRM and feminism is painfully ignorant dangerous to the future of the MRM. Men and those who advocate for their rights have suffered numerous abuses at the hands of feminists and you actually pretend like we're somehow attacking feminism. We're not the ones protesting their conferences and meetings, pulling fire alarms at their speeches, physically attacking those wh…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:45 PM
1

I'm talking about people who believe in equality. That's what feminism means. No it doesn't. Neither in theory or practice, ESPECIALLY not practice. Because most of the oppression is suffered by women. According to the woman focused ideology known for exaggerating female suffering and hiding and disparaging male victims. Right. but so do the actual rapists and molesters and harassers! It's a real, actual problem, and until men's rights groups actively recognise that, You can't be fucking for rea…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:36 PM
1

Cite* No but we could stop treating feminism as some monumental evil conspiracy. Sure thing...when they stop conspiring against the rights of men in ways that could be described as evil, like levying death threats to MRAs, and dusting male victims under the rug to suit their agenda.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:29 PM
1

men in power Men with power is not a coherent political system of philosophy, unless you believe in the Illuminati or some shit. That, or you're saying feminism is comparable to a conspiracy.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:28 PM
1

offer advice to the self proclaimed rapist on how to help her victim cope and heal. Do you even fucking hear yourself? You don't seem to understand the difference between bravery, and having no shame.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:23 PM
1

If you think feminism can be discarded because of the screaming loonies on the fringes And where do you think the 'loonies on the fringe' learned it from? Women have many faults, men have two, everything they say and everything they do. A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. -popular feminist sayings "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female. "I feel that 'man-h…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:22 PM
1

If equality is your goal, feminism has to FUCKING DIE. Really I'm just sick the fuck to death of you ignorant toads who keep coming here whining about "why can't we just work together gaiz ;_;". Because when we try to advocate for men, we get death threats, slander, or otherwise censored and shouted down. Feminism has the blood of generations of male victims on it's hands, men who would not be heard even if they had spoke up thanks to feminism.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:52 PM
0

You seem to think it's all my fault. ...you're the one who called the fucking cops. Yet your problem is that your husband was arrested, and you "miss him". It is your fucking fault. He shouldn't have dumped water on you, but what he did was comparable to an annoying prank, as opposed to the possible life destroyer your layed on him. If he's smart, he'll leave your ass.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:44 PM
-4

I call the cops The kids miss him and so do I. Lol...sure. My advice...to him...is to divorce your sorry ass.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:42 PM
3

Meanwhile the overwhelming majority rest of the show is "where's the evil man who did the crime". Which I guess I can't exactly blame the writers for sharing such a wide reaching ignorance and bias.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:25 PM
58

But women are never violent, they're saintly angelic creatures incapable of malicious behavior. Clearly that evil oppressor did something to her to deserve it.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:14 PM
1

I was looking for ways that we can change And what exactly do we change? Should we stop advocating for men and their rights, because that's the only way feminism will stop attacking us.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 12:02 PM
1

An admin stepped in and posted not long after they became a default about how they're had been repeated attempts by users there to make up stories of victimization, nasty messages that did not exist, false flag trolling, that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:49 AM
5

There's also that one fun thread they had a while back where a woman came to them and admitted she raped her boyfriend and the top comment started with "You are so brave posting this".
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:48 AM
1

I don't know who got the idea that we're traditionalists, or how he got it. He's a masculinist, aka a feminist by another name.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:14 PM
1

Too many feminists are so busy telling each other what masculinity "really" is that none of them bothered to ask guys about it. LOL You give them way too much credit. They don't ask men because they don't care what men think masculinity is. And the only real reason they care about determining what is masculine is so they can attack it.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:13 PM
1

Show proof, contact mods, quit your concern trolling.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:12 PM
15

The fact that when women advocate for men they receive less hostility than men perfectly illustrates the problem.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:57 PM
1

Speaking of 'campus speech' I find it absurdly hilarious how today on college campuses of all places they have predefined areas known as "free speech zones". The host of intellectual learning, and related liberal ideas, the successors of those who gave birth to the idea of free speech as we understand it today have done this. What a brave new world.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:07 PM
1

Fuck off and die. Didn't I tell you I'm done with you?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:37 AM
2

The quote made two statements: 1) females do not view men inherently abusive, but believe it is a product of culture It said nothing of 'females'. It said feminists. If you can't even make that distinction you're not worth wasting my time with. And feminists do see men as inherently abusive, such is their rhetoric and the evidence of their actions over the years. correcting this view is the aim of feminism. I guess that's where "patriarchy", "toxic masculinity", #killallmen, and the theme of dus…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:46 PM
2

The author said she does agree with the quote, in part, but that wasn't the primary objective of feminism. So you quit fucking lying too. Oh you mean how she never explained what part she actually agreed on? Or how she explicitly stated that she disagreed with the idea quoted "Feminists are your best friends", that you've repeated throughout this thread as some trite little copy paste "nuh uh see you're wrong" response. And where did I lie? What did I lie about? Just admit what a raging jackass …
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:53 AM
2

Quit fucking lying, the author did not say that, in fact the very purpose of the article is refuting that idea. Do you really believe if you keep repeating your blatant lies in this thread they'll magically come true.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:42 AM
3

...uh we didn't read the same article apparently. The author is a gigantic fucking cunt who spends the entirety of her short little essay( let's not pretend this short steaming pile of blogspam shit is worthy of being referred to as an article ) downplaying men's issues and grand-standing female victimhood, and talking about how feminism is not for men. the author even specifically says "feminists are your best friends" That would be someone she quoted dipshit. An old line of rhetoric feminists …
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:39 AM
0

You're right, they're not regressive, they're worse. Simply accepting the system as it is and exploiting it to your favor is stagnation. We should move past what holds us back, not celebrate it.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:29 PM
2

It's funny how as feminist backlash against the MRM has ramped up they've dropped the "feminism is for everyone rhetoric" and started adopting a more honest approach. Which is good I think. It'd be a great change of pace to have opponents who don't constantly lie, or atleast to a degree they'll be lying less.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:20 PM
6

Exactly.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:54 PM
4

We understand it, we just don't accept it like you do. You're regressives.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:55 PM
86

I prefer kicking people off campus who advocate ruining other people's academic careers and denying them education they payed for based off hearsay and rumor.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:15 PM
3

The same thing that's been going on in it for years.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:35 AM
7

why as I woman I agree I think I you accidentally.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:33 AM
4

I can't recall any holy wars where women were expected to be sent off to die. Either way it doesn't matter. If you're just here to play your disgusting little game of oppression olympics and dismiss the historical suffering of men under religion you can just fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:19 PM
3

You're right, men were never beaten over the head with their inherent sinful nature by religious ideologues to make them toe the line. Cus it'z alwayz teh poor wiminz! ;_;
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:02 AM
3

Patriarchy, Illuminati, the devil, the man. When you believe the world is out to get you but you can't substantiate that fear with reason or evidence, it helps to have a boogeyman to blame it on.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:00 AM
12

"I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero- sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary- vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the shitwork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do." -- Robin Morgan "Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:56 AM
1

It's a nice feel good sentiment, but it honestly seems like the majority of women can't really fathom that concept. Between the in group bias, and what we recently seen as the general global hostility women have towards men...well I'm not holding my breath on throngs of women en masse championing men.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:00 AM
0

What is it with people who defend feminism and dictionary definitions? If I write a dictionary and define neo-nazi as "a kind caring person who advocates racial equality" does it make it so? You can dishonestly regurgitate dictionary definitions all day, it doesn't change reality, what feminism actually is, instead of the fantasy you choose to believe.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:57 AM
1

Feminism is inherently a sexist principle, abused by some for power, but supported by many to that goal whether ignorantly or intentionally. Most feminists are implicit in the same crimes a few have comitted thanks to the support of that most. Religion(generally) does not discriminate, if you can worship, no one cares how you were born. Feminism is naturally discriminatory. Even in it's most benign form it's still sexism. For the record, feminism and religion are quite alot alike. Emotionally dr…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:51 AM
5

Pretty close. I'm still amazed how easily MRAs are drawn in with honey to a narrative so reminiscent of musing of gendercide.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:41 AM
1

I'm truly amazed at the patience the rest of you have. Also quite amazed at your inability to spot a troll.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:39 AM
1

Not all feminists represent feminism. You're right, they don't. I don't disagree with that. In fact it's the basis of my argument. The influential and powerful voices of feminism represent feminism, they set the tone, and their tone is one of hatred towards men. but tarring all feminists with the same brush is just as helpful as those feminists' tarring of all MRAs with the same brush. We don't support people who talk about women like they're subhuman.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:38 AM
3

Your argument is fallacious and disingenuous. You can quote wikipedia all day, it doesn't make reality follow suit. Sufferagette terrorism, death threats sent to those who try to advocate for men and boys, erasing male victims and female abusers, protecting bigots, constant themes of fantasies of gendercide, and strong use social aggression tactics like gaslighting, proxy violence, slander, shaming. For fucks sake, some mentally ill narcissist went on a killing spree and all feminists have done …
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:00 PM
3

Misandry is intrinsic to feminism, it's history, beliefs, and most hailed icons are proof of that.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:25 PM
1

efukt? liveleak?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:35 PM
3

Maybe it's just me, but does anyone else notice how when you see men doing these petty little pictures they always look so sad and pathetic.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:38 PM
2

But he said in the opening he hates feminism, why would he deplore criticisms of feminism?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:25 AM
1

This sub reddit is only for mens rights and it mostly attacks feminism which I implore. I'm not sure that you're using that word right. Just wondering...how old are you?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:24 AM
5

If killing all men, killing all ugly women, and enslaving the rest as living incubators were normal I'm pretty sure it would be an issue...but that doesn't happen. Never let reality get in the way of constructing a narrative.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:18 AM
2

Ooh look the latest in a succession of trolls who come to /r/mensrights to trash the sub, derail discussion, and cause trouble. Why don't you drink the anti-freeze in your garage.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:54 AM
8

By being a concern troll.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:54 AM
0

Uneducated, religious, poor, brown, and owner of a penis? Fucking misogynist!
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:39 AM
1

I think you're confusing "feminist" with "bigot." How do you confuse synonyms, those mean the same thing. Bigotry is intrinsic to feminism, and those women I quoted are more feminists than half the people you quoted. I think that you're taking perspectives of only the "radical" feminists? I've heard feminists rant about how the whole expectations of men thing is stupid, male rape victims deserve equal treatment, etc. When, 20 some odd years ago in the 80s? And what have feminists done in that ti…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:35 AM
5

Anti-feminism is part and parcel with goals of equality.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:16 AM
1

91% of rape victims are female and 9% are male, and that nearly 99% of rapists are male, [excluding prison statistics, in which more men are sexually assaulted than women, but with men still the most common rapist] These stats are so absurd they're not even worth considring, get out of here with that bullshit. The same studies that say this are the very ones that exclude male victim of women and don't take into account under reporting. Go fucking hang you disingenuous sack of shit.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:13 AM
3

I think you're confusing desperation with resentment and hatred.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:41 PM
5

That's just patently false.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:36 PM
2

"Can you come over RIGHT now? The other babysitter got stabbed on the way over here by her supposed best friend, I had to take her to hospital and now I'm running late for my best friends hens night." Rough neighborhood.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:35 PM
6

It'd help if some women would stop shouting down those male voices.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:26 PM
12

The chances of a man who was actually raped being recognized as a victim are already slim, so what are the chances a man accusing another man of rape could have any effect what so ever besides getting a chuckle out of a cop.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:16 PM
5

He lives in Portland and doesn't care for fat people?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:15 PM
1

Women have many faults, men have two, everything they say and everything they do. A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. -popular feminist sayings "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female. "I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morga…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:00 PM
1

If she does not, with her body language, etc. Considering men are socially expected to initiate, the least women can do is make it clear they're not interested instead of playing mind games and being manipulative. There's also the fact that if you're taller, larger, stronger, etc, she might not feel safe enough to reject you, because she doesn't know how you'll react. Just like I don't feel safe enough to ask some random black person for directions, right, I mean they could mug me or something. …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:50 PM
1

If one OT or troll comment is all it takes to confirm a woman's opinion, I got news for you, she's dumb as fucking dirt.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:59 PM
4

Like homeless, abused, raped, poor, and generally wronged men, these guys simply don't exist in feministland. The only men that exist to them are caricatures of men, who are either old, white, powerful, and maliciously plotting to oppress women, or ugly, fat, "spergy", and socially inept neckbeards who say nasty things about women on the internet.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:56 PM
1

WHO THE FUCK ACTUALLY LISTENS TO THE COSMOPOLITAN MAGAZINE FOR DATING ADVICE. Alot of people apparently, or they wouldn't be in business as a women's magazine for half a century now. People also read the dailymail and watch FOX news, go figure. match.com: "Hot Topic: Acting a little uninterested The old-school strategy: Give your date a little insult so he or she works harder to win you over." Match has a whole damn page on these mind games. http://www.match.com/magazine/article/8129/The-RIGHT-W…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:48 PM
3

Believe me, bigot supporting concern trolls like you won't be missed. More and more people are not tolerating feminists pathologically driven histrionics and blatant and unapologetic bigotry towards men. And I hate to break it to you, but it's not MRAs trending things like #killallwomen, but in fact feminists engaging in fantasies of gendercide. MRAs aren't abusing their influence or power to silence female victims, but feminists have done as much to men. So you enjoy living on the wrong side of…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:34 PM
5

Except we have won over influential feminists. Again, a handful of aging 2nd wavers who've been socially ostracized from feminism isn't some great victory when they've been getting shit on by feminists at large themselves for longer than some MRAs here have been alive. Some of our most influential MRA journalists and leaders were once feminists, and popular ones at that. Exactly. CHS and Farrel made careers out of feminism, they like so many others, had based their life around feminism and what …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:24 PM
3

This is especially true among the more influential feminists Oh you mean influential like...oh I don't know Mary Koss? winning any of them over is huge because they wield so much political power in the gender paradigm. Winning them over is a fool's errand. Reformed Neo-nazis are rare for a reason. People who make careers out of their prejudice aren't going to change just because they're being opposed or even if they see that they're wrong. We need to divide and conquer, expose their atrocities, …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:11 AM
1

And the legions of so called "good" feminists who support them and are implicitly just as bad. Misandry sits at the very core of what feminism is.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:44 AM
2

And by ignorant, they are good germans. They are culpable atleast for their own intellectual laziness for not even being aware of the atrocious things done in the name of feminism. Ignorance is not an excuse, it's a reason.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:40 AM
3

So...not even a full handful of feminists...versus decades of countless man hating feminist icons. Boy I guess feminism's not so bad after all.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:28 AM
3

Exactly. The worst MRA's are misogynists. Actually the worst feminists have literally broken the law to silence men's rights advocates, and redefined what it is to be a victim through their influence such that generations of male victims have been dusted under the rug. The worst MRAs says some nasty things about some random feminist on an internet forum. BOO FUCKING HOO. The "good" MRA's are timid or silent whenever women's issues come up. Women's issues are not the MRMs responsibility, we have …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:27 AM
2

Because they are not innocent bystanders. If you sit by idly and ignorantly allow and implicitly condone bigotry you're nothing but a good german, no better than the "radicals"(because core feminist ideas and mainstream feminist icons are such outliers).
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:20 AM
1

That kind of divisive behavior is why social and political issues are so toxic in the US. True change requires at least convincing the other side they are wrong. We're talking about people who when they here someone is having a meeting, or a speech, or a convention where the topic is not preapproved by them they send death threats, pull fire alarms, and scream obscenities at those attend. YET YOU INSIST SOMEHOW WE CHANGE THEIR MINDS?!?! What kind of fucking drugs are you on.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:19 AM
-4

All feminists are misandrists, whether explicitly or implicitly is only a detail of their own ignorance about feminism and it's actions. In summary, I think we need to try and build some bridges and try and work together with others even if currently we don't see eye to eye. You cannot be fucking serious... Feminists have slandered, abused, levied untrue accusations at us, tried to pin some mass murder who had no objective relation to us on us, have gone out of their way to silence us, and hide …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:11 AM
1

As I said, people can be persuaded. Especially considering women are taught to purposefully say no and "make him work for it".
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:52 AM
2

Being the one who doesn't have to do the whole initiation bit and worry about getting shot down all the time, check your privilege. Women's dating advice is littered with tips about "making him work for it" and playing hard to get. A DICKASS MOVE. You know what else is "a dickass move". Sitting on your pedestal waiting for men to initiate then getting mad when they do.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:51 AM
-2

Stop your fucking concern trolling, if you have a valid criticism, make it.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:27 PM
1

I don't see what's so barbaric about it Right... Nothing barbaric about the forced brutal, violent, sexual mutilation of a new born infant's genitals, robbing them of their sexual integrity permanently and dulling their sexual pleasure into adulthood...nothing barbaric at all. and this is a part of religious freedom. No it's not. Right to "religious freedom" ends where the basic human rights of others begins. Jews are free to fully castrate their own genitals per their decision if they feel like…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:34 PM
1

Fuck off and die.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:27 PM
1

They can't conceptualize that one's sex should not matter.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:26 PM
2

Your callous and disgustingly hateful disregard for the rights of other men is what makes you subhuman. I hope you die a slow castration related death.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:49 PM
2

"waah waah I'm being ""oppressed""" Even if your histrionics had any basis in reality, I don't give a shit, why should I? My rights are a joke to you, so just fucking kill yourself you subhuman shitfuck.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:39 PM
6

Maybe not disabled men, or elderly men, but that goes without saying. If you have a penis and are able, you are expected to provide, this is a world over thing.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:37 PM
3

Barbaric blood ritual traditions don't trump basic human rights to bodily integrity and autonomy. Normally I agree with what you have to say, but I never took you to be so ass backwards on this issue.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:36 PM
2

When we compare the removal of a foreskin--an important tradition for some groups, dating back thousands of years--to amputating a clitoris, we look absolutely ridiculous. I could seriously give a fucking shit less what traditions heebs have. That shit regardless of gender, or religion is a serious violation of basic human rights that has got to go asap.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:35 PM
2

Hmm... that's grosser than clever. Still keeping it! (Unlike your foreskin!) Kill yourself.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:33 PM
1

Unfortunately no. Some of us feel strongly about it. It doesn't get the discourse it deserves since most men are seemingly insecure about talking about it and ALWAYS have to say some variation of "well I'm happy with it".
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:32 PM
2

The fact that the first thing we do to men when they're born is to violently violate their bodies, not just their bodies, but their genitals, says all that needs to be said about the state of men in society.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:30 PM
4

I see through your petty ploy, but it's not the same, and like all your comments, poorly thought out. Social expectation posed against men as a gender, versus singular incidents that do not amount to all men harming women. If it weren't the case, men would not be half the workforce, yet 90+% of workplace deaths, that sort of thing does not happen without strong social pressure on men to provide. Try again bigot.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:26 PM
6

...defensive...like a snarky dismissal of male victim phrased...I don't know like "smacks of "what about teh menz"". You seriously disgust me.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:22 PM
8

Don't feel hopeless! I don't think you needed to assume the commentator was offended by your response. I didn't read it as one of offense, rather, someone with a blunt manner of speech who was attempting to get a point across succinctly. It's just a blunt post stating that commenting on an article about female child molestation to say that boys have to worry about it too, derails the discussion. If your discussion about child molestation leaves out the other half of the population for no other r…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:21 PM
5

Who's rephrasphing the typical MRAs rhetoric about NotAllMen in, what was assumed to be, a very very obvious way? You are a feminist, you are defending feminism. And the difference between NotAllMen and NAFALT is I didn't choose to be a man, I was born a man and won't apologize for it. Ideology is chosen, sex(short of invasive surgery and hormone therapy) however is not.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:12 PM
12

not all feminists are like that It's funny how the responses from feminists and those defending feminism are always so typical, it's like you've been brainwashed into what to say. I mean every damn time it's word for word the same pathetic excuses. http://www.genderratic.com/p/3300/misandry-nalt-and-nafalt-and-how-feminists-can-rebut-the-charge-that-they-are-all-man-haters/
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:03 PM
13

It's one of two things with these people for this. Malicious dishonesty, or ignorance. They know that if they can frame criticism against feminism as against women they can just pull the "but ur a misawgenist" bit and shut you down. Call these people out every time you see them doing this.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:01 PM
13

I'm pretty sure the actual stated 'goal of feminists' is to support legal and social equality. And the stated goal of the NSDAP was the revitalization and strengthening of Germany! Guess the Nazis weren't so bad after all, just look at their stated goals. I see MRAs stating over and over again things about how: -people live up to their labels, so be careful how you label them. -you shouldn't vilify 50% of the population just because of a few bad apples And yet, here's a post that specifically vi…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:59 PM
1

Women who demand men pay on the date are just prostitutes who demand more time, effort, and money than the chick giving it away on the corner. Plain as that. That or they're handing out some serious fucking awesome sex to the men she dates.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:39 AM
2

Another gal here: Where did /u/k33perofgates say they were a woman?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:35 AM
2

Atleast it's not another "I'm a feminist, despite feminism clearly being so bigoted and hateful" post. I just wonder if it was possible to contain and use the energy created by cognitive dissonance by all these posts we could probably power the lights in a small third world village.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:23 AM
1

No, they don't.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:21 AM
1

Fucking this. I'm sick the fuck to death of seeing women and feminism conflated, it's either done out of a malicious attempt to deflect criticism of feminism as "bigotry" or out of ignorance because the average persons just accepts that criticism of feminism is wrong, like standing up and proclaiming god doesn't exist in the middle of a sermon, it's sacrosanct to the bigoted and ignorant.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:21 AM
1

there seems to be more than a little outright hated of feminism and feminists Gee...I wonder why. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25fnnf/because_fuck_having_a_real_discussion_from/chh4f24 which really goes a long way to confirming the image that Men's Rights forums are little more than echo chambers for men who are angry with women. no it doesn't. We could all be claiming feminists are evil demons sent by c'thulhu to take our souls and use our skin as leather jackets, it wouldn't mea…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:16 AM
6

It's called cognitive dissonance. You should run these people into the ground with it. It's the only way to fix their broken minds.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:03 AM
0

Neither is, and she's not your "friend".
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:02 AM
0

These people are why the shooting squad death penalty should exist. Needles/poison is unconfirmed to be painless, hangings take too much time, electric chairs are unreliable and a bit cruel, but a bullet does a damn good job.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:59 AM
4

Dump her. she clearly doesn't respect you she clearly can't empathize with you she's clearly a navel gazing cunt she's damaged goods that needs to project her sexual insecurity onto men(that means you) she will either harm you, or get you in legal trouble based on the above RUN FOR THE FUCKING HILLS.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:54 AM
3

The difference is I was born, male, all those women who said those things chose to be feminists and so does every other feminist who calls themself as much, so no, it's not at all like #notallmen. Because all feminist are like that whether explicitly or implicitly.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:50 AM
2

That 99% figure on rapes is bullshit and doesn't need stats to back up that it's bullshit. Any figure citing 99% without accompanying studies to back it up can be safely assumed to be bogus.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:18 AM
18

Some people think it's "sexist" but it honestly applies to this one. No one knows or cares what genitals you have on the internet. http://i.imgur.com/f2rLQ.png
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:14 AM
7

Difference is /r/Pyongyang is a joke sub.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:09 AM
0

No, you disrupt MRM forums How? Because I don't kowtow to feminists lol. encourage the stereotyping and prejudice of a very diverse political movement I criticize and shed light on feminism's abuses, abuses they go out of their way to hide and dismiss. Like alot of MRAs, I refuse to accept feminism's dogmatic hate towards men, and monopoly on gender discourse. and spread misinformation You've yet to disprove anything I've said, so try again. The first sign that you're batshit crazy: You can't ha…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:01 PM
0

Your insistence to support feminism on their behalf. Having white children doesn't mean you should become a neo-nazi.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:55 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25fnnf/because_fuck_having_a_real_discussion_from/chh4f24
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:54 PM
0

"I like being a member of the Klan, but man do their racist activities piss me off, I wish they would stop that". Pretty much what I think of all these "I'm a feminist and don't like feminism" posts lately.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:28 PM
3

Being a woman and shitting out a brat pretty much makes you brahmin in the west. You are untouchable even by the law.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:49 AM
2

First world women are not oppressed. Our society goes completely the fuck out of it's way to cater to women.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:48 AM
2

Marx 2.0, minus all the intelligence.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:46 AM
8

One thing that's always stuck out to me. How men and women dress. Men are still wearing the same blue jeans, and plain black and blue suits they were decades ago. Women's fashion on the other hand has evolved, changed, and grown for more than half a century. But but teh patriarchy!
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:38 AM
2

Then stop supporting that hate ideology and stop being a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:30 AM
0

What "bigotry" exactly, point it out, I dare you. Instead of baseless accusations how about you back it the fuck up, because I know you can't.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:05 AM
0

Right, because I disrupt feminist events, pull fire alarms, advocate gendercide of women, and go out of my way to hide male abusers and female victims, I'm just like them. You're a feminist in denial, the sad part is your spoiled little princesses and whatever sons you may have will pay the price for your stubborn ignorance.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:05 AM
0

Educate yourself you feminist sympathizing fuckwit. http://www.genderratic.com/p/tag/mary-koss/
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:03 AM
1

Oh, so then she must be several people at once. No, she's just far more important than several people at once, for better, or the obvious worse.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:10 AM
2

So what you're telling me is women's movements and early feminists took the ideas of the KKK and instead of lynching any random black person, they took to using the legal system to lynch any man who 'offended a woman's honor'. The rape hysteria of the KKK was race based primarily. Unless you know of some lynchings of white men from that era for similar behavior.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:08 AM
0

Regarding your first comment, I am vehemently opposed to suppressing male abuse victims and also to ignoring female abusers. Yet you insist on calling yourself a feminist. I am also under the impression that feminism has little to do with ignoring female abusers and suppressing male victims (the idea that women cannot be aggressors and men cannot be victims is deeply rooted in our culture, and indeed something that feminism is in opposition towards). Like most, your support of feminism exists on…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:05 AM
0

Your definition of a feminist is pointless when the reality is starkly different, and no you don't have to fly the feminist flag. I do not know how I feel about "flying the feminist flag," though, because that seems to be an attempt to associate me with radical feminism and I resist that. Then don't be/support feminism.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:03 AM
3

Tender years doctrine was also frequently used in the 20th century being gradually replaced towards the end of the century, in the legislation of most states, by the "best interests of the child" doctrine of custody. Furthermore, several courts have held that the tender years doctrine violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. And what the fuck does that prove other than that family court is operating precedent of a previous era, it's still discrim…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:43 PM
2

Derpy has been trolling for the past couple days. Some people take a honey approach, some take a vinegar, I say go with acid. Derpy needs to have their shitty fucking bigoted opinions run into the ground.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:28 PM
1

Each issue mentioned in the OP has been caused or compounded by feminism, divorce, custody, and child support. But legal disparity? That's one complicated can of worms, with numerous influences such as tradition, the politics of how people vote, trends in statistics, money, philosophy, judicial bias, subconscious instinctual motives... I could go on. Yea bullshit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tender_years_doctrine http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25fnnf/because_fuck_having_a_real_disc…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:25 PM
1

the bias in the family court system, pedophile hysteria, rape hysteria. The things before that no, but you can't be fucking serious about these. Especially family court system and rape hysteria, holy shit don't tell me you're that fucking delusional.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:23 PM
1

All true, but people like derpy intentionally and some others unintentionally conflate feminists and women in that: "Feminists are dumb" "misogynist" X "Women are dumb" misogynist" ✔
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:57 PM
2

All those quoted issues are attributable to feminists. And quit conflating women and feminism you dishonest fuck.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:07 PM
2

His hatred of women seemed to stem from him basing his own self worth off approval by women, which he apparently could never gain. Had it not been that, that had triggered him to do this, it would have just been something else. His hatred of women, and desire to kill/control all men, which ever he would have chosen in his deranged fantasies, was a side effect, not the cause.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:32 PM
-7

"true" MRA groups and distilling men's issues to a handful of legal maladies caused by feminism.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:29 PM
51

"We don't know if he was mentally ill". I don't know how people keep fucking saying that with a straight face. He was so fucking narcissistic he believed he was going to kill all men on earth, the ugly women, and make some kind of underground breeding farm of women or some shit. WHAT FUCKING HEALTHY MIND THINKS THAT???
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:25 PM
2

Prejudiced delusions should not be condoned or encouraged. Also...fucking brony scum.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:20 PM
4

One thing to remember. This explains it, it does not excuse it. Challenge them on it till you wear them down. If that destroys your friendship, well you win either way.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:18 PM
1

The best part? I'm gay. And she KNOWS IT. "I have to live every day with the fear that a man could do that [rape] to me." Histrionic self flattery. word of the day by the way, Histrionic, feminists fit that word just fine. How can I make them see that the "not all men" argument is legitimate? That not everyone is capable of sexual violence simply because they have a penis? And that men and boys face serious issues, just like women? It's fucking hard undoing ideological cult like programming.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:16 PM
2

If men's rights are feminism are opposing, how can you explain my concern for my own sex as well as the male sex? You don't have to fly the feminist flag or kowtow to their ideas to advocate for women's rights.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:05 AM
2

That said, feminists, by definition, attempt to advance the available opportunities of women in society, and unfortunately this can result in overlooking male perspective and male issues (simply because we tend to be wrapped up in our own affairs). Is that code for ignoring female abusers, and male abuse victims? But I do not see this discussion between women's and men's rights as antagonistic in any sense, and I am frankly appalled why the two don't work together more often. You want to know wh…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:57 AM
13

One of the most satisfying things to do to people like this is to invent some hypothetical situation and subtly and cleverly turn it on it's head so that it blatantly shows their own prejudice to them. Of course I'm also the sort of asshole who would immediately throw it in their face.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:32 AM
7

You know what's funny about #yesallwomen. The Ayatollah of Iran retweeted it and what he said was actually more reasonable than what has been typically accompanying that tag.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:20 AM
2

False rape accusations, biased custody policy and law arranged in the name of women by feminists, men killed because of the accusations of women, the seeming epidemic of ignored female teacher pedophiles who get away typically with but a slap on the wrist, that men "can't be raped" by women, etc. "Wow you have some balls saying that." Like, really? Way to erase people without them, way to imply that having balls means to have to be tough, way to imply that not having balls makes you weak, way to…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:34 AM
2

Go cry about your hurt feelings and wounded masculinity to yourself, as you're the only person those matter to. Thanks for proving my point. Women like you are pure cancer.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:19 AM
2

Toxic masculinity might hurt men, but it literally kills women. And toxic femininity kills, maims, lynches, imprisons, and defames the rights of men. Don't forget that your feels are not on the same level of importance as someone's life. Wow you have some balls saying that. Don't wanna admit to your privilege? Fine, whatever. Just be aware that you're part of the problem. Again, fuck yourself dead you evil bigoted cunt.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:51 PM
8

This shit is not new, at all. "When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression." -- Sheila Jeffrys "The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality." -- Andrea Dworkin "In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." -- Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminis…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:47 PM
1

how much or how little clothing they choose BY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO WHISTLE AND HOLLER AT THEM AND CALL THEM CREEPY SHIT LIKE "BABY". the same people, like the gangbangers in south central LA are the same people as the black lady who works the register at the gas station up the road. You're a fucking bigot, just admit already. All this while being paid less The wage gap is pure bunk. Women are not paid less but by their own career choices, this shit has been debunked so many times over the years …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:41 PM
5

Because that's how you use that word as a past tense verb. And to describe something covered in gold.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:34 PM
3

Sorry, but unless you have to deal with the same harassment that women, poc, trans* peeps, gay folks and other marginalized groups do, you have privilege. Except men do, difference is no one is telling you to "woman up" and deal with, you actually have support systems in place that men do not. Someone calling you out on your male privilege isn't them being sexist. Yea, they absolutely are.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:30 PM
6

Men like Eliot Rodgers are typically more likely to harm themselves than others.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:24 PM
7

I want to walk to my car in the dark in safety. And you are safe doing as much, as a woman anyway. Believe what ever fear mongering feminist horse shit you want. Your victimization is the exception, not the rule. I want to feel the privilege that men do, I want safety. Ya, nevermind that men are statistically more often the victims of violent crimes, raped and abused but never believed because "men can't get raped", and that the laws are set up in such a way that even if a man is raped or abused…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:14 PM
2

How does that prove I deleted it? That proves I didn't delete you fucking dipshit.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:11 PM
11

You assume she gives a shit. She's a fucking narcissist who can't see the world but past her own asshole.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:57 PM
12

it kinda sucks when you are harassed and expected to either put up with it or appreciate it BECAUSE MEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THAT'S LIKE, HUH?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:57 PM
3

Then you're no different from a racist who gets mugged by one black guy and then attends a klan rally the next week.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:56 PM
1

Treating bigots with hate is just going to swing the pendulum the other way. We'll end up with male rights extremists that flock to the hate and end up putting women down as a whole, and that's not a real solution. Feminists should be insulted, downplayed, derided, and opposed How the fuck are those two even related? Stop conflating women and feminism. It's more like feminism just needs to be refined--distilled into its helpful, reasonable form. There are some feminist voices out there (which, a…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:44 PM
1

No I didn't. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/26jzo7/female_here_who_thinks_this_yesallwomen_shit_is/chs40zz And chances are she is full of shit, she's a feminist. The girl who cried rapist too many times.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:37 PM
0

People do change their minds you no, it's not impossible to be persuaded.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:35 PM
1

Feminism is intrinsically sexist towards men, their ideology, rhetoric, and actions all speak to that. You need to educate yourself.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:35 PM
1

Feminists have been chipping away at men's rights even before the 60s. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25fnnf/because_fuck_having_a_real_discussion_from/chh4f24?context=3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tender_years_doctrine In further relation to the above. Feminists are responsible for dusting under the rug generations of male victims and female abusers.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:34 PM
5

Every feminist you've met has not been a major icon, lawmaker, or in anyway influential. Virtually every feminist with that sort of clout however is every bad as vicious as some internet SJW, where do you think this generation learned it from?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:32 AM
3

Feminists gonna feminist. Chances are she's full of shit. Anger, and lies is something those like her excel at.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:18 AM
1

See a therapist.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:40 AM
2

Because I don't give a fuck, again fuck you.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:39 AM
3

So the useless and inaccurate definition then?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:16 AM
1

It's eerily similar in structure to communism. A metaphorical handful who have power and influence who have fooled millions into doing their bidding. I know not all feminists are evil, just some, the rest are ignorant, some other feminists fall into some other categories.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:54 AM
5

By what definition? Words in a dictionary, or an accurate definition based of what they say and do.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:49 AM
-4

In that sense you and I see feminism entirely differently. I don't think it should be a movement for equality, I think it needs to be destroyed, the things feminism has systematically done to men over the previous century and into this one are unforgivable.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:48 AM
3

You're a feminist, you're by definition against the rights of men.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:38 AM
8

Man beaten, and tortured to death. "I wonder what he did to deserve it". You're fucking scum.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:35 AM
0

Your 'work' comes at the expense of men, fuck your work and fuck you.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:28 AM
3

If you're available and said no there's still a chance, though slim. If you're not available and said told them as much they stand far less of a chance than the other scenario.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:27 AM
-3

I feel like both sides, both the angry feminists and the angry anti-feminists, are missing the scary truth: the things they are saying as they find increasingly more exquisite ways to insult and downplay each other are harming us all and creating more gender issues than all of those movements are trying to solve. Feminists should be insulted, downplayed, derided, and opposed at every turn. Bigots should always be treated as such.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:23 AM
1

He started off like with the first sentence minus the 'women are evil' bit with a good point. Women's role as the gatekeepers of sex is a strong factor in the traditional system which causes so much grief for men and women. After that it all goes downhill amazingly one sentence worse after the next. The narcissism is also rather astounding, and so unashamed to. It's like he was totally unaware of his own narcissism, referring to hisself as a "perfect gentleman". Since when did gentlemen go on sh…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:31 AM
3

I really think people underestimate the damage narcissism can cause. See /r/raisedbynarcissists.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:25 AM
30

Frogman never struck me as the neckbeard feminist type, he sure visually meats the criteria for a pathetic white knight, but damn.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:30 AM
3

The difference is the MRM has not actively harmed the rights of women, nor have any of our leaders or major voices ever said anything half as fucking evil as the typical feminist icon. I've yet to meet even the most bitter and burned MRA fantasize about gendercide. Meanwhile gendercide of men is fairly common meme among feminists. killallmen ring a bell.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:40 AM
0

A rape fantasy is a rape fantasy. The fetishization of rape in it doesn't totally disappear because she planned some kinky event. I really think Eulabeia is onto something even with the last bit.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:31 PM
-2

I don't know why this is getting downvoted, it could honestly explain the prevalence of rape fantasies among women.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:30 PM
-3

Women need to be taught that not all men want you. Honestly something like this would fucking shatter alot of women's realities. That's why this idea is typically met with accusations of "misogyny", if that term has any meaning anymore.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:29 PM
2

Dude. What on Earth are you on about? Every human is human, and the safety and well-being of every human counts because every human is valuable Blah blah blah emotional feel good non-sense. Their value is not proportional to how large a part they make up of the total human population. From the standpoint in this situation they are. Every person is valuable in and of themselves, because they're human and, I believe, because they are created by God. http://i.imgur.com/bPe81DK.jpg Now I think I und…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:17 PM
3

They need something to placate irrationally insecure women and idiots like you. And your point about population is ominous. Are you saying that people are expendable in proportion to how big the population is? That human value is measuring relative to population size? That's pretty dark, mate. Oh I see, only women are human. Only their humanity and safety counts. The only reason men as a group should go out of their way to defend and protect women is if the human species is at risk. 7 billion of…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:08 PM
3

No they don't. And men especially do not have some special obligation to defend women. If we lived in ancient times and the human population was measured in thousands, not billions, you'd have a point. But women's privilege as the protected sex is over. It's time they grow up, put on their big girl panties, and carry a fucking tazer. Also, the fact you keep bringing up "physical strength" speaks to your ignorance of how a violent confrontation can go down.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:49 AM
13

And yet women aren't expected to do shit to help men. Fact is in a violent confrontation, unless you're Andre the Giant sized, strength doesn't matter much, it doesn't take much to kill any person. Women's safety is not men's responsibility.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:38 AM
5

Yes actually, even Bell Hooks is more of a feminist by merit of contribution good or bad than any stay at home mom who hashtags feminism on her facebook.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:34 AM
4

And yet they do, in fact they abuse children more often than men do. It should be ok to hit women anyway that it's okay to hit men.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:31 AM
8

I think there are feminist like that in academia but I don't view all feminist like that. I think stay at home moms are just a feminist as women who choose to work over having kids Guess which one of those types of feminists has actual practical influence in the real world. Protip: it ain't the one who went to redbox to rent the newest barney for her kids.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:57 PM
50

Really makes me feel good knowing not all situations like yours end up the legal horror story that seems to happen to most men. Also thankfully your ex was fucking stupid as dirt.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:31 PM
11

As a general principle, "Men should not hit women" is a good idea. Men are generally physically stronger than women and the strong should always restrain themselves over against the weak. Yea, no. If you put yourself in a situation where someone may react violently to you, like abusing their child, and you're "weak", too bad so sad shouldn't hit a fucking child you piece of shit. But it's also the responsibility of the strong to protect the weak Women's is not mine nor any other man's responsibi…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:30 PM
11

Wishing there were circumstances where hitting women is ok Oh you mean compared to all the various circumstances where it's not only ok but encouraged to hurt men? You say you came here "doubting what you had been told", but the truth is you came here to reinforce your own pre-concieved bias.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:27 PM
16

Answer me honestly. Why are you intentionally being dishonest? Unless of course you believe women should be allowed to violently abuse children without anyone doing anything about it, is that what you believe?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:25 PM
1

She's in for a world of slander and hurt from feminists.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:14 AM
1

In an ideal world the process of gestation and child birth shouldn't be women's choice and burden alone. Women are taught not to see their ability to gestate and give birth to a life as the amazing act of nature that it is, and more of a feature to their vapid life. "I'm pregnant and won't be able to drink on my vacation :( Guess ill get an abortion xD"
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:02 AM
27

Holy shit...Cosmo is TRP for women.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:40 AM
1

Maybe you found something inspiring in it, but all I found was trite justification for prejudice. You'll forgive me I hope for quoting star trek, but: "I think, when one has been angry for a very long time, one gets used to it. And it becomes comfortable like...like old leather. And finally... it becomes so familiar that one can't remember feeling any other way." - Jean-Luc Picard When those feminists say they hate men, they mean it, I know that because they've made careers out of it. Dusting un…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:40 AM
1

that many people who claim to be members of the feminist movement have done shitty things in its name. that doesn't rule out feminism as a cause. That list of quotes was qualitative, not quantitative. If I quote mined every instance of a feminist saying awful things it would be a never ending job. It's not how many feminists I quoted, it's who I quoted. Politicians, big name activists, public icons, one of those women was a fucking presidental advisoress to Clinton for fucks sake. Each and every…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:28 AM
11

He killed the men as a result of his misogyny. I just stopped reading right there.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:00 AM
7

Can the mods please ban this asshole? How is this not spamming?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:59 AM
10

I really think you hit the nail on the head. I'd also like to point out another comment I saw in a default sub about this incident. Someone said something to the effect of: "Why don't assholes like this kill theirselves before going on a rampage!?" To which someone replied: "Most do, average joe suicides don't make the news though." For every man like Eliot, there are countless men unlike Eliot who turn their anger and pain inward.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:46 AM
1

I think you're arguing against a strawman of feminism: Oh really... Coulda fooled me. I have never seen a single feminist argue for that viewpoint. By distorting what the other side believes in, we make it easier to view it as obviously false. One of the first major feminist books written was literally named The Feminine Mystique. mys·tique misˈtēk/ noun noun: mystique a fascinating aura of mystery, awe, and power surrounding someone or something. A huge portion of feminism's time is spent aggra…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:37 AM
1

Don't bother. A quick read of your recent comments tells me what sort of petty and disgusting person you are. See my comment to you in /r/nottheonion for an example. In the gender debate and advocacy for victims despite all the political lines drawn in the sand and labels taken here and there, I see mainly two sorts of people. Those with a genuine, empathetic, and humanist interest in the suffering of others, and shit heels like you who prefer slinging mud and pouring salt into wounds than banda…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:15 AM
1

men's rights activists perpetuate the kind of thinking that led to events like this -- the thinking that women are evil and out to get them. No, they don't. You're exploiting mass murder, a tragedy, to further a narrative and smear campaign, it's disgusting. The MRM does not teach men that women are evil and out to get them. It teaches them that yes, they can be harmed by women despite what they've been told all their lives, that women aren't perfect almost divine and benevolent beings who do no…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:05 AM
1

And what have men's rights activists done? Said mean things about feminists on the internet Fucking boo hoo ;_; Meanwhile feminists have legislated away men's rights, discriminated against them at every turn, dusted under the rug generations of male victims and female perpetrators, and feminist icons have said things about men that if said about race would make a fucking klansmen blush. So don't fucking lecture me about what "those nasty MRAz" did/said when what they may as well likely didn't sa…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:31 AM
5

You can characterize game as whatever you like, male or female it's social-sexual opportunism. I personally could care less about how people go about getting their one night stands. I just wish people didn't act like when men do it they're evil, but when women do it they're "liberated".
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:25 PM
25

Feminism is inherently leftist by nature. Those who swing right around here conflate liberalism with feminism. Which is about like conflating conservatism and nazism.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:22 PM
10

Lol why is this comment getting downvoted? It's fucking true.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:13 PM
12

The overlap is irrelevant. TRP philosophy and MRA philosophy are intrinsically different. It's the difference between opportunism(TRP) and activism(MRA). The only reason they overlap is because the subject/demographic is the same(men).
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:09 PM
2

If by 'documents this forumn's "hate speech"' you mean quote mines, ignores context, lies, and makes snide and indignant commentary, then yes. Even if shitboobz meticulously and accurately documented anything here a fucking internet blog is not a source.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:05 PM
2

Fucking hit the nail on the head.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:53 PM
0

No not "good for them". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman It's an accountability cop out. You also can't really "eject" someone from a political ideology. The fact that people like Warren Farrel and Christina Hoff Summers still hang on to the label despite being widely shat upon by feminists for giving a shit about men and boys is proof of that. This "no true feminist"/scotsman shit is unacceptable. Feminism and feminists have to be held accountable for their wrongdoing, not arbitrar…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:48 PM
2

All that we lack today between the MRM and feminism is balance. Further general recriminations such as yours only weaken both, no matter where they originate. I challenge feminists to seek at least one men's rights advocate they can respect and visa versa. That means you. I know of one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayaan_Hirsi_Ali Erin Pizzey, Warren Farrel, Christina Hoff Summers. But you know one thing just all these 'feminists' have in common? They've all been roundly harassed for not conform…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 12:39 PM
8

I'm sure the meta bot that links their thread back to here has nothing to do with the vote totals here. Nothing at all.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 05:17 AM
18

Domestic violence to a T. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/to_a_T
/r/MensRights24/05/14 05:15 AM
4

People are really ignoring the elephant in the room. 2xc maybe a 'women's subreddit' but at the end of the day for all it's history of comparitive mildness, it's still a feminist space inhabited largely by feminists, typically the 'good' bystander kind. The kind so deafeningly ignorant to the history of horrors feminism has committed against men you gotta wonder if they call themselves feminists simply because they like the way it sounds when they say it. When 2xc grew the radical feminist eleme…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 05:14 AM
2

This is nothing but an extention the tired "no true feminist" that feminists themselves spew everytime they're criticized.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 05:05 AM
5

Feminism will not benefit your daughters. Not unless you consider benefiting them turning them into resentful, spiteful, unempathetic, myopic man haters.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:56 AM
2

It's like a version of plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:54 AM
46

Man abuses woman: literally about to rassle up a fucking mob and call the police to hang this fuck. Woman abuses man: loooool Video pretty much sums up DV to a fucking T.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:53 AM
1

I'm thinking "why is he still referring to us as inmates. fuck this guy." This is why. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment A lesson discovered long ago, but a lesson never learned. I'm sure people outside prisons play their own role in all of this as uncaring bystanders.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:17 AM
4

That's still pretty goddamn high for people whose job it is to enforce and uphold the law.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 01:25 AM
3

More like Nazi Party officials and good germans.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:05 AM
2

That's because MakhSC is a concern troll.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 06:19 AM
2

I'll take corruption over prejudice.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:35 AM
0

MGTOW isn't trying to "persuade" anyone. It isn't a "movement" either. Why criticize what you fundamentally don't understand?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:27 AM
1

The things feminism has done are unforgivable. Generations of male abuse victims and female predators have been dusted under the rug and ignored for the sake of feminism's worship of femininity.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:04 AM
0

I don't want to change feminism. I want to burn it to the fucking ground. 100 years of this shit, it's too little too late for "sorry, we'll change". More than that change in feminism is impossible. These dehumanizing and resentful ideas lie at the core of what feminism is.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 05:47 AM
-1

If by conspiracy do you mean they regularly conspire to harm men, then yes.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 01:21 AM
1

Until we (women included!) can hold women responsible as adult individuals for their own bad behavior, the discussion won't continue. But but misogyny1!!!1
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:46 PM
-5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burn_centers_in_the_United_States
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:18 AM
2

Get a lawyer get a lawyer get a fucking lawyer!
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:16 AM
5

I say I see alot of SRS tags. But I'm not GWW.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:08 AM
3

It reeks of feminist contempt and hatred for men. Particularly troubling is this part. Be particularly careful with a man who claims to have been the victim of physical violence by a previous female partner. The great majority of men who make such claims are physical abusers.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:01 AM
1

has become. It's always been this way. They're just more careful about hiding it now. In the past this sub has covered incidence like feminist "protestors" saying and I'm paraphrasing: "How can we shut them[MRAs](in context of speeches at a certain canadian university) down and censor them without sounding dishonest or hateful". Or agent orange, an MRA who faked his way into a feminist internet forum where he documented and kept records of feminists advocating and talking about the genocide of m…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 09:18 PM
12

Women need men like a fish needs a bicycle "I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor. "I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero- sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary- vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 09:14 PM
6

Sounds pretty typically feminist to me.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 09:00 PM
9

Misandry is inseparable from the core of feminism, it's history, ideas, and actions speak to that.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:08 PM
12

Aerik is an emotionally damanged, self hating white knight. He's an example of men who are simply beyond redemption and without hope. David Futrelle is another good example of this kind of man. You really gotta wonder what was done to them as children for them to turn out with such a raging hatred of theirselves and other men.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:02 PM
1

But that is some pretty terrible shit right there, but I can assure you that it's not in a feminist's agenda to beat men. And I'm not going with a "not ALL feminists" sort of approach but to generalise us with people who openly support violence against men is not true. And yet shitting on men is consistently what feminists do. Sooner or later you're gonna have to reconcile your dogma and adherence to feminism with the reality of the hate group that it is.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:55 PM
1

Eat shit femicunt. This is how feminists operate. The Duluth Model the feminist answer to DV. Read directly from the Duluth Model web site: The Duluth Curriculum Doesn’t Account for Women’s Violence As earlier stated, there is a growing movement of practitioners who maintain that women areas violent as men or that women share responsibility for the violence. These practitioners often insist that domestic violence is a relationship problem and that marriage counseling should be an option for coup…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:13 PM
1

And while you're whining about "radicals" boys in pakistan will continue to be abused. Feminists don't give a fucking shit about male abuse victims, if they did they wouldn't go to such lengths to hide them, along with female perpetrators. Get outta here with this "patriarchy" garbage.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:55 PM
2

No shit. Most services related to protecting children were created and orchestrated by female feminists.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:36 PM
1

Oh eat shit.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:30 PM
6

Physical inferiority is not an excuse for wantonly assaulting others. You also don't have to be mike tyson to really hurt someone.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:42 PM
6

porn is evil! It's like conservative anti-sex ideology 2.0, except this time women are exempt.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:24 AM
1

You allocate resources to fight some 'oppression' or discrimination against a given group because that's what we're talking about. If we were all regarded as individuals rather than judged by the groups we belong to then discrimination wouldn't be the problem. Fighting discrimination and allocating resources to victims are two different fights, there's no reason the two should overlap. Progress in the former will alleviate suffering in the latter.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:15 AM
1

How is anything I said "hatin'" on anyone? If you're too cripplingly stupid to comment, don't bother.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 09:52 PM
2

Yes it does and to say otherwise would imply there is no need to intelligently allocate resources to tackle these problems. You allocate resources to victims, not to groups of people who happen to have an incidence of victimization. This idea that empathy and resources must be parsed out by some subjective measure of suffering of a group of people, experiences that can and do vary wildly from one person to the next even within these specific groups is asinine. It's why feminism is the monstrosit…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:44 PM
8

iacknowledge.net More like lacknowledge.net
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:37 PM
1

It's the difference between benevolence and maliciousness. The dynamics in difference between racism and sexism are also quite different, very different in fact. Racism is an othering of people, the outsiders, those people. It's pretty damn hard to be both racist and in intent benevolent. Meanwhile a great deal of sexist ideas and attitudes affecting men and women generally had or have a good reason that escapes minds such as...say /u/Nomenimion. Men wanting virgin wives and shunning non-virgin …
/r/MensRights17/05/14 01:07 PM
47

Oh yea that reminds me. Just the other day I saw this woman, and I thought she was pretty. I just started jackin' it right there. Hey, you know, I'm just a stupid man. hurr
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:32 PM
2

calls herself a feminist. You said it. If your ideas and values run contrary to feminist actions, and you're largely shunned from the feminist group...how much of a feminist are you?
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:59 AM
3

And the top comment now by an order of several hundred upvotes. First of all, you're very brave for sharing
/r/MensRights17/05/14 02:13 AM
6

Does she call herself a feminist? http://i.imgur.com/uuae3HT.gif
/r/MensRights17/05/14 02:04 AM
6

Please answer this. I'd like to know this cunt got her comeuppance.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:41 PM
8

Honestly I'm starting to think women are taught, and have, no social boundaries. As a man I can't possibly imagine seeing any innocuous looking person and saying "Hey I should grab their child away from them because I think it might not be theirs". Between all the stories I've heard of women's "gay male friend" getting sexually harrassed, this kind of shit, and the way women treat all men(slapped if you disrespect her, sexually harassed without consequence) it's hard not to get this perception.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:39 PM
0

I took my kids to the Y for swimming a few months ago. I was helping them get changed afterwards. I guess someone saw something and the manager came with a security guy and escorted me to the office. They asked me to prove that I was their father. The only thing I could do was call my wife to come down and verify it. I saw my entire life disappear in front of my eyes, and it scared the shit out of me. Holy shit what kept you from coming unfuckingglued on those assholes? Shit talk on the internet…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:32 PM
2

That's gaslighting. Which if defined as fallacy is still genetic fallacy. Even a broken(crazy) clock is right twice a day, even if they're accusation/insult is true.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:38 PM
2

I know it's a tired typical thing you probably don't wanna hear, but why in god's name do you watch Fox?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:19 PM
1

I can't fathom why anyone would continue to push it. Depends who you see pushing it. If it's a leftist or Obama fan, or a feminist, you can all but be sure they know they're lying through their teeth for political pity oppression points. I've had two different college professors regurgitate the wage gap to me twice in just a semester, and one the previous. The latter can be chalked up to out of date information and ignorance. When the wage gap issue was brought into the fore of political discuss…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:18 PM
1

I can tell you why men are dehumanized in tragedies. We're expected to be there. We're expected, sometimes even obligated to die. Just that good ol' Male Privilege™.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:13 PM
1

It's genetic fallacy actually. Not ad hominem. Also contrary to belief an insult is not necessarily ad hominem. Ad hominem is an "argument" which consists of only personal attacks. You can still call someone an asshole and have it be a valid argument if that's not the entire basis of your argument, but a cathartic feature.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:19 PM
4

If anyone has the suicide note put it in a pastebin and post it here. Fuck this evil bitch.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:34 PM
1

The difference is one is self-inflicted and the other is inflicted upon my by women. And in both cases it's men who suffer.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:32 PM
-4

I happen to recall when /r/mensrights first started barely any posts could stay in the positives because SRS and other feminist subs took to brigading this place like there was no tomorrow, comments under posts were all hidden from being downvoted below the threshold, and this was normal for a long time. So you'll forgive me if I couldn't possibly give less of a fuck about the state of voting and posts in /r/femicunts.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:27 PM
5

they probably wouldn't think any differently about men's rights if they were able to see past its image problem. You mean the image problem they're responsible for? there's some vocal bad apples that easily ruin the bunch Oh yea that "bad minority". The ones that also happen to be the most powerful and influential. "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female. "I feel that '…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:22 PM
1

They've had half a fucking century. And now bogus bullshit like "rape culture" and a non-existent wage gap is what they campaign on in place of oh say the fact that men are half the workforce yet more than 90% of workplace deaths and injuries. If you still believe feminism would ever help men, I'm sorry but you're totally and entirely delusional.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:18 PM
2

Trashy people.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:16 PM
3

And here's my chance to exercise my future predicting abilities! You will never refer to feminism selectively! Wanna know why? Because all the "good feminists" are good germans. Pathetic useful idiots complacent in the atrocities committed in the name of the ideology they so staunchly cling to.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:34 AM
4

Cults are hard to escape from emotionally and mentally.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:29 AM
5

Neither is using your ass backwards tribal religion to justify human rights abuse.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:16 AM
29

Echoing a brilliant comment by 46n2arejustaheadofme since this topic is almost always bogged down by insecure men, surprisingly insensitive MRAs. Just to preemptively clear up the inevitable slew of misinformation that comes with this topic, and give some talking points for discussion: Male circumcision (partial or full removal of the foreskin) is comparable to any form of FGM, that's not up for debate. People will bring up the anti-intellectual drivel and state that "you cannot compare male cir…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:23 AM
6

Yea I can actually. I can compare it to anything, saying "you can't" is the "nuh uh ur rong" of arguments. Regardless of that I made no comparison in severity, the comparison is tradition and acceptability, which you brought up. The fact is however MGM is a violation of men's basic human rights to bodily autonomy and integrity.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:18 AM
4

Basic rights like bodily autonomy(something men all but entirely lack) and integrity is not "an insignificant issue".
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:15 AM
9

It doesn't matter if MGM makes men cum chocolate flavored edible gold, it's a violation of basic human rights. It takes away from men something they can never get back. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:14 AM
3

You can't. Hopefully he won't hold it against you, chances are he won't. But he can never get his foreskin back(or atleast the medical technology isn't currently there, probably will be by the time he's old enough to do as much..) but no amount of "I'm sorry" will make him intact again. That said you and the people who advocate circumcision knowing how damaging and awful it is are a farcry apart, ignorance is a poor measurement to judge someone on the whole.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:13 AM
10

Your opinion and ass backwards tribalistic rituals don't mean shit compared to the basic human rights of boys and men.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:11 AM
6

a practice that had been going on for thousands of years and was completely normal. So was(is to a degree) slavery.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:10 AM
1

Right...my defense of men and their rights pointing out the vicious and toxic nature of feminism makes me "as bad" as feminists who advocate gendercide. A more disingenuous argument you could not possibly make.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 01:41 AM
-1

Derailing and making fallacious arguments does not strengthen the MRM. It accomplishes the opposite.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:03 PM
-1

What they're doing is textbook concern trolling.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 10:12 PM
1

Right, I guess that's why feminism's major icons and voices have all been level headed and kind to men. "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female. "I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor. "I haven't the faintest notio…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:18 PM
8

If women had penises feminists would walk around taking viagra like candy while naked and getting pissed at anyone who took issue.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:14 AM
3

Denial of the obvious, like http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25jpa6/have_women_been_oppressed_for_thousands_of_years/[3] Alright, I get that men are getting shafted CURRENTLY. But you can't deny women had it not very well when they were not allowed to attend schools, universities and were not allowed to vote. Are we denying simple historic facts now? Has it come to this pseudo-denial community reminiscent of holocaust deniers? Meanwhile men were obligated to work the most dangerous jo…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:12 AM
5

but massive internal debate Because differing opinions and healthy discussion is a bad thing. downplaying rape I'm sure you can provide evidence of this. many other sketchy things have left me wanting out. Again, "sketchy things"? I'm sure you can elucidate.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:02 AM
3

She is poor taste.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:58 AM
-1

I've been pretty good this time around. I think this is actually the oldest account I've had to not be shadowbanned. I could honestly give a shit less about the admin's rules on reddit besides pertaining to this sub, seeing as how they don't honestly care about the quality of the site anymore.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:55 AM
-1

She oughta be dangled off a high building.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:53 AM
1

I thought SRS had some offsite thing too?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:48 AM
-2

They'll only get rid of me if they IP ban me, and even then that can be circumvented. On my 6th account now.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:42 AM
1

SRS
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:56 AM
0

It embodies feminism, in ideology and action.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 01:57 AM
4

Death of men is a statistic, death of women is a tragedy. Much like the difference in death in war and death in peace. Men are expected and even in some cases obligated to die.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:41 PM
2

voluntarily sterilize
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:33 PM
6

So we got a 3 year old in florida being forcefully circumcised under a judge's orders, and we got an adult man being told if he ever reproduces again he'll be imprisoned. If it's not yet clear, men have FAR LESS right to their bodies in the first world than women do.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:33 PM
3

Making feminism not about man hating is about like trying to separate the racism from "southern pride".
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:27 PM
4

And feminists have enabled countless female predators and erased countless male victims. It's like comparing rumors of murder to evidence of genocide. Sorry, but the unlikely boasting of some neckbeard internet mod doesn't compare to the institutionalized atrocities feminists have committed.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:18 PM
3

You think feminists care about women in the third world lol, that naivete would be cute if it weren't so damaging.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:16 PM
2

The shit feminists have done doesn't compare to some angry bitter man saying stupid shit about women on some blog. Feminists have erased entire generations of male abuse victims, have campaigned for laws, legislation, and policy which have ignored female predators and harmed innocent men. It doesn't even begin to compare. I've also yet to meet even the most angry redpiller advocate gendercide of women, let alone any major MRA voice with any influence say anything even remotely as evil.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:05 PM
4

I support a movement that defines women as equal superior!
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:01 PM
4

Just complacent and implicitly supportive of people who act like them.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:30 PM
2

They certainly take alot cues from them as far as propaganda and rhetoric are concerned. Nazis believed jews were an evil group of people who pulled the strings in the world and made life hard on germans. Feminists believe men are an evil group of people who pull the strings in the world and make life hard on women. Nazis used thuggish black shirt tactics and street violence to shout down opposition. Feminist use thuggish black shirt tactics and street violence to shout down opposition. Nazis us…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:16 PM
4

It's not an emotion it's a state of being. Someone who breaks their body working sun up to sun down is objectively more miserable than someone who works 9-5 or even flexible hours in a clean, and air conditioned room where all they do is write shit down.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:12 PM
0

Concern troll elsewhere.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:01 PM
1

Feminism? Or Western feminism? It makes no difference, feminism operates on inherently bigoted and toxic principals that slowly destroy whatever society they take root in. Do you not believe women who are affected in the third world need some of the root concepts of feminism in their life to have a better quality of life? No they don't, they need advocates for equality, and practical help, technology, better and more consistent access to basic resources, and the men too. They don't need some ang…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:00 PM
2

Oh I get it, how typically feminist. You can't be held accountable. "Yea, god forbid I be offended that I'm grouped together with those nutcases just because I identify as a nazi, I didn't kill any jews." Speaking of nazis, there's a term for people like you. You're a good german. You don't want to be held accountable for the atrocious things feminism has done to men? Stop being a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:00 PM
4

Just because it was considered normal doesn't mean it wasn't objectively more miserable.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:53 PM
1

You're using the plight of women in the third world as a crutch for the existence of feminism. It's fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:50 PM
7

God forbid we be hateful to people who hide male victims of abuse and castigate all men as rapists and abusers.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:49 PM
3

How is that a response to what he said? He tells you to quit hiding behind women in the third world and you respond like he told you to stop advocating for them? Did you miss the point or are you this stupid?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:44 PM
11

How about actually doing something about them? Fucking good germans.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:42 PM
9

NOW, VAWA, duluth model, "men can stop rape", the scores of feminist icons known for saying things that would make a backwoods racist blush if said about any minority. As far as "many" is concerned most feminists are useful idiots. Average people drawn in by propaganda and instilled with such a self-righteous point of view that the mere notion that they could be wrong about any feminist aligned opinion is enough to claim someone else is somehow a bigot. Feminism has generations of men's blood on…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:39 PM
9

negative stereotypes It's not a stereotype if it's an evidence backed fact.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:34 PM
2

So you're actually shocked by this behavior? You just have no clue how fucking evil feminism is. How feminists have purposely hidden male rape victims and female predators. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2551/male-privilege-defining-male-victims-out-of-existence/ The follow up to the previous. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2798/male-disposability-mary-p-koss-and-influencing-a-government-entity-to-erase-male-victims-of-rape/ http://www.genderratic.com/p/tag/mary-koss/ The Duluth Model the feminist a…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:26 AM
1

I said it wasn't a balanced article since it didn't talk about male rape and was banned without an explanation. Guess it wasn't a sub about feminism after all. It's very much a sub about feminism and you just got a taste of how feminism works. Don't these people realize that this kind of attitude is counterproductive to wanting equality for everyone? They don't want equality, they want superiority.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:21 AM
1

Thanks, didn't catch that.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:33 AM
2

What social changes has feminism caused that have been "downright evil"? Perfect example. Beyonce's sister assaults Jay-Z on video. "Lol what did he do to deserve it." That men are schrodinger's rapist/abuser. http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/i-am-schrodingers-rapist/ An old feminist concept finally given a name. That men cannot be raped or abused. That women do not rape and cannot abuse men. And feminism has supported and maintained social forces like male disposability. I know that without…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:33 AM
3

Seriously though, I support Men's Rights as well as feminism, You support cognitively dissonant redundancy. you can say they're contradictory as much as you want I don't say it, I demonstrate it, I have fucking evidence of it, incident after incident of feminism trying to shut anything men's rights related down that they can't strictly control and pay petty lip service to. Feminists have blatantly dusted male abuse victims under the rug with no fucking consequence, so don't dare fucking tell me …
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:11 PM
1

No amount of Paul Elam calling anyone a cunt or a bitch compares to the downright evil things feminism has done to men and their rights. I cannot understand how you find it galling that I have an interest in mens' and women's rights. Maybe you could explain a bit? You have a redundant interest in the MRM and feminism, if you cared at all about either men or women's rights you would drop feminism like the hot, reeking, pile of shit that it is. I suppose I have a more positive view of human nature…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:56 PM
5

Yea, no point... Nevermind them constantly trying to censor and shout us down even when what we're saying has nothing to do with them. Dismissing and disregarding male abuse victims, black shirting our events and meetings, slandering anyone who doesn't toe their ideological line, spewing death threats at anyone who dares to step out of line or hold a differing view. No point in opposing feminism at all. was focusing on women's rights. Feminism does not focus on women's rights, it focuses on femi…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:27 PM
10

No feminist has yet to criticize Mary Koss or the CDC for erasing male rape victims right out of existence via their statistical definition of rape. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2551/male-privilege-defining-male-victims-out-of-existence/ The follow up to the previous. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2798/male-disposability-mary-p-koss-and-influencing-a-government-entity-to-erase-male-victims-of-rape/ http://www.genderratic.com/p/tag/mary-koss/ Women have many faults, men have two, everything they s…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:21 PM
0

Yea....no. Close minded bigotry is not an excuse for having the moral bar set low for you. If anything it should be set even higher.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:16 PM
10

We don't oppose women's rights, they however do oppose men's. Opposition if you're an MRA is someone castigating all men as evil oppressors who constantly try to rape and abuse women. Opposition if you're a feminist is someone having an opinion slightly dissimilar to yours.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:13 PM
4

So is being a close minded shit heel who makes death threats when people ask for empathy.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:05 PM
1

Setting the bar for "good" and "open minded" at new records of low I see.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:04 PM
-2

open-minded feminist Oxymoron. I mean really, do you hear yourself? How do you describe someone who laughs about acts of violence then questions what the victim did to deserve the violence as "open minded"?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:01 PM
5

It is a good step for victims of MGM though. It won't stop it, but it can help those who already have suffered as much.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:58 PM
3

A piece of shit.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:56 PM
3

The mods, the subscribers, their favorite icons, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:53 PM
6

What stupid shit? Trying to have a discussion with them? And you see how they respond, right?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:52 PM
3

You're forgetting that most people here are still ignorant enough to believe feminism has any feeling towards men or their rights that isn't vitriolic and hateful. Some of the people here actually believe feminism and the MRM can "get along".
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:50 PM
1

Not holding my breath for genuine support for men. The averge person man or woman will pick women over men everytime when it comes to empathy.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:46 PM
4

Most people are not malicious, but are simply ignorant. Elements of feminism exploit this and the good intentions of most people. Feminism also instills in them a strong sense of self-righteousness only found in religion. Why do you think they need such jarring and stark examples to show just how fucked their worldview is?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:42 PM
1

I work in a female-dominated industry with several women who identify themselves as feminists. Sorry to hear that. They are honestly great people they operate under the assumption that men generally don't suffer, either via personal suffering or that imposed by societal standards. Uhh... I was fully expecting a shitstorm to ensue, but instead I was met with complete silence and blank stares at me. And then they gave each other blank stares. And then they looked the table in silence. It took me a…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:39 PM
4

"I think"..."I can('t) concieve of" It does not fucking matter what you think, women can rape men, it's a fact and it's not up for debate. There's only two reasons you refuse to accept as much: A) you're just this ignorant of male anatomy and too stupid to logically process how made to penetrate works B) your incredulous bigotry prevents you from seeing any suffering by men It basically boils down to the fact that I can't conceive of female on male forced penetration rape being actually possible…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:20 PM
37

I'm not a film nerd or anything but I really don't recall any 50s era male revenge porn movies against women.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:49 PM
2

"I think"..."I believe" Fuck what you think and believe. This isn't about your opinion, this is about the fact that feminism opposes men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:04 AM
6

I identify as a feminist, but I care deeply about a lot of men's rights issues that the feminist movement often glosses over. You realize these things are contradictory, right? I'm particularly concerned about the rights and protection of male victims of rape and abuse Then why do you identify as a member of a group known for dismissing male abuse victims? not all feminists support men's rights activism Understated like the KKK doesn't support civil rights.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:58 AM
9

Guy posted his problems to the wrong sub by a fucking mile. First off, I'm really sorry for the douchebaggery happening down in the comments. SRS controlled sub. GEE I FUCKING WONDER WHY? You people are fucking toxic.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:51 AM
8

I can't imagine any man living in a major city jumping at the chance to get into relation ship with some random woman who lives in buttfuckegypt, USA. One night stand sure, but a relationship?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 12:06 AM
10

There is no equivalence to be made between male violence on women and the converse. Yes there is, but regardless of that did you even read the last paragraphs? solipsism and Quixoticism Right, because I'm dismissing female victims and romanticizing male ones. That's what simply pointing out the suffering of men is, a fucking pissing match, that's the way you want to frame it. I simply want them recognized, instead of hand-waved away as you so flippantly do. I knew from the beginning you would be…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:19 PM
11

How does forced penetration male rape work? Made to penetrate, as in she forces him to penetrate her. Whether by violent force, coercion, manipulation, or use of drugs, same as any woman is raped. Look at FGM And MGM is just as important. To which you say "but FGM is more severe, they're not comparable" To which I retort "so what" Why? Because severity, prevalence(MGM is more so for the record), types, etc is all irrelevant to the reason why GM is opposed. It is opposed because it violates a per…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:00 PM
10

So you own the discourse because you score more highly in victimhood? This isn't about "oppression olympics" or aggrandizing the vicimhood of men, this is about getting male victims recognized, your hand-waving away of even the possibility of male victims run's contrary to that. Did you just selectively ignore the whole "male victims dusted under the rug" bit or what? Trying to "out-victim" women is not the way to go in advancing men's rights. As I said this is not about "oppression olympics" th…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:27 PM
45

Fatal weakness of toxic women: asexual men, and homosexual men.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:21 PM
7

Not enough time served, right? Yes actually. You're incredibly ignorant to the extent women can abuse men, or just how much of it and how often it gets dusted under the rug both by the victims(under reporting) and those who are supposedly advocates for victims.(dismissal and hiding of abuse via official sources) One of the few times a statistical study on rape actually even counted made to penetrate as any form of sexual violence a feminist was there to make sure it was not counted under rape, t…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:00 PM
10

It doesn't help to come here spouting this right-wing propaganda. Pretty sure propaganda is opinion based. Colleges and universities, barring religious/private ones, are uber radical left typically. Pointing out what is more or less fact is not propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 02:18 PM
6

IAMA by MRA figure "brigaded" by MRAs Eh?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:52 AM
1

Rape jokes are no different from any other joke about human suffering. It's typically a way of coping with the morbidity of such events or the joke is delivered in such a way you can't help but think it funny. That said a joke about rape doesn't diminish the severity of the crime itself anymore than a fictitious depiction does. But of course there are many feminists who even think the fictitious depiction of rape is "problematic"(be wary of people who use this word), typically even alongside gra…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:58 AM
2

http://redditenhancementsuite.com/ Makes browsing reddit easier.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:34 PM
2

No clue what any of it means. I think who ever made it updates it every so often so you have to copy paste whatever new tags they've made into your console.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:34 PM
13

Yes Add this to your RES. http://www.triggerwarning.tk/ Now look at the comments there again.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 09:51 PM
3

Kloo?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 09:11 PM
6

From a comment I made a couple days ago, and mind you I didn't even cover half of the shit feminists have done. feminists, and women Feminists and women are not the same thing. No feminist has yet to criticize Mary Koss or the CDC for erasing male rape victims right out of existence via their statistical definition of rape. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2551/male-privilege-defining-male-victims-out-of-existence/ The follow up to the previous. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2798/male-disposability-m…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 08:42 PM
42

song about a man being abused feminists outraged because they think it's hateful towards women Sums up feminism pretty well.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 08:10 PM
8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D11Nyzq1n0&feature=kp
/r/MensRights10/05/14 08:07 PM
2

Well the test is bunk. I got a 47. But I'm a fucking western college student who has no bills(yet), my own car, spending money, clean water, and no worries about where my food/water is coming from. That puts me well above most of the fucking human population. It's pretty clear who ever typically comes up with this "privilege test" crap is probably a little over-privileged themselves. But what can you expect from trite feminist garbage.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:16 PM
2

Little more threatening to feminists than a woman who can achieve her goals without their help, or worse denounce them for trying to co-opt her achievements.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:36 AM
1

Yea and Warren Farrel and Erin Pizzey are 'feminists' too. What's your point?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:05 AM
2

The whole campaign against johns buying prostitutues is sex-negative feminism rearing it's bull ugly head again. Except this time they're platform has changed a bit. Now instead of all sex between men and women being rape with women being complicit in it somehow, women are encouraged to spread their legs as wide as possible while men are simultaneous shamed for diving into the genital pool. The "good"(read: sex positive) feminists like to pretend sex negative feminism no longer exists and to a d…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:23 PM
1

I think you're confusing republican with libertarian. Socially most people here are strongly left leaning, they just don't drink the feminist kool-aid, most of the time they don't anyway.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:18 PM
0

And that's the issue here. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. When people look closely at what feminism is they see it is poisonous. Opening up the subreddit to all this attention is the worst thing that could happen to them and boy do they know it. QFT
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:15 PM
2

They are obviously feeling the heat Good, it's time to burn the feminist house down to nothing but ashes.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:10 PM
-1

Now we wait and watch as feminists rail against it/try to sabotage it in some way.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:09 PM
1

Maybe if you didn't do things like fucking equivocate pregnancy and raping children.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:07 PM
1

Jesus titty fucking christ what the fucking fuck is the matter with you. No child chooses to be molested. Short of rape a woman chooses to have sex at the risk of pregnancy, she get to decide if she wants to keep it or not. There's also the fact you're talking about the difference between A GODDAMN CHILD AND A GODDMAN ADULT. And finally, molestation is not illegal because it 'makes children feel bad', it's illegal because it mentally and emotionally damages them causing them to do anything and e…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:59 PM
5

Hilary could have also meant like civilian casualties. 70% of casualties in the iraq war were/are women and children civilians A shitty and useless statistic considering we just started conidering any male over a certain age to be a "combatant" regardless of whether they were or not.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:46 PM
1

Not all women are feminists. I never said nor implied they were.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:44 PM
64

Well... "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." -Hillary Clinton
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:36 AM
20

Of course they don't know, they don't care about men. Half the world's population of men could die tomorrow and most feminists probably wouldn't notice and if they did they'd throw a fucking party.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:56 AM
22

Women can stop the murder and abuse of children. Put that shit on a poster.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:04 AM
18

Alot of them don't have clean running water and get various skin infections that threaten their health and hygiene. Clearly the answer is the forced flaying alive of new born infants.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 02:14 AM
2

cultural circumstances Who gives a fuck, fuck the culture, and fuck the circumstances.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:31 AM
2

Male circumcision (partial or full removal of the foreskin) is comparable to any form of FGM, that's not up for debate. People will bring up the anti-intellectual drivel and state that "you cannot compare male circumcision and FGM..." and they are wrong, but they probably aren't worth arguing with in the first place. Any two things can be compared on their objective characteristics and have their similarities highlighted, FGM and MGM aren't excluded, denying that two objectively similar things c…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:30 AM
0

Bullshit. You want equality you get equality. Make FGM legal in Ireland until MGM is made illegal. The fucking end.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:29 AM
-3

Discriminately giving preferential treatment for abuse is an awful move, it's fucked up and wrong.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:26 AM
-8

"Women need men like a fish needs a bicycle" That quote is like 40 years old if a bit older. It was a joke long before you came along.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:02 PM
0

It's more than just the white house, the entire feminist mindset in regards to sexual assault is viciously toxic.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:40 AM
3

I'm counting on Hilary's connection to the current administration being what keeps her out. Or atleast I hope so.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:38 AM
2

With the same special forces he let loose on the rest of the world via covert executive orders going so far as to assassinate US citizens without trial.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:32 PM
1

All feminism is sexist by nature.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:00 AM
7

Oh woops, I didn't assume the accusations were true, I'm such a monster for taking the opposite side you have. She has a reason to lie, he doesn't.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:10 AM
2

There is no such thing as "emotional rights". You can get glad in the same pants you got mad, as the saying goes. No one is responsible for your emotional well being but yourself. If a woman has such an issue with abortion she's free to give birth and have the child.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:40 PM
7

Yes, I'm sure the woman who was promised something but then did not receive it has no motivation to lie, nope none at all.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:39 PM
3

The emotional cost is not men's responsibility nor should it be. If it were men as a group let alone MRAs would have alot of motivation to resent women for their physical inferiority and the fact men pay the price for war in women's stead.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:47 PM
1

This is sexistic feminism. First, this isn't a word. Making up words is asinine. Second, assuming "sexistic" meaning what I think it means it's redundant to say "sexistic" feminism.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:32 PM
2

"Patriarchy", of course, has nothing to do with actual men. They just want a name for "all the shit that's wrong with society", and chose to attached a male-gendered name to it. It's more fun for them to pretend that men are the enemy, rather than recognize that half of men are pro-equality, and that half of the anti-equality pro-gender-role sexists are women. You make bigotry so vitriolic, that it spawns people wishing genocide on men, seem arbitrary.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:28 PM
6

Nothing will make abortion easier for women who will be negatively effected by it, that doesn't mean men should suffer for women's biological and inevitable issues. Consider it a pittance of a trade for the fact that men die in women's stead when shit hits the fan. Also I'm just loving the irony of the shoe being on the other foot for once. So finally I get to say this as the situation is appropriate. Ahem... BUT WAT ABUT TEH WIMMINZ!!?!
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:25 PM
10

Yes, laws explicitly discriminating against men don't constitute any sort of systemic prejudice against men. Also fuck you the horse you rode in on and this fucked up mindset that someone has to be "oppressed"( does word even have any fucking meaning any more?? at all? ) for their problems to matter.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:20 PM
4

We saw this coming. We all did. Feminists are masters of propaganda, and they've successfully managed to convince the west and other powers that be that India is somehow the worse place in the world for women by highlighting handfuls of severe crime against women while conveniently ignoring these handfuls of criminal incidence are statistically insignificant when considering the population of that country as well as disregarding crimes and issues men similarly face there. But of course that last…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:19 PM
1

as well as the cost of the procedure itself Not necessarily. Most ideas from MRAs I've heard on financial abdication of fatherhood involve paying the mother a small sum to have an abortion if she chooses.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:15 PM
3

Severe and unfair onsequences for things out of your control, oh how much that must suck.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:13 PM
2

I think abortion is practical. I'd like to think of myself as a pragmatist, and as a pragmatist, abortion works. The 'pro-choice' idea that a fetus isn't a life is absurd, after a certain point in gestation there's no argument that can say killing a fetus in the womb is somehow morally superior to killing a prematurely born baby, or how to these same people the fetus is not alive, yet if you killed the pregnant mother they wouldn't think twice of considering it a double murder. Just as well the …
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:11 PM
5

God I despise TEDx talks. I've not even seen a full handful worth wasting the time to watch.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:02 AM
2

We know for a fact some don't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy Further, a conscience is often defined externally via a person's judged morality, and morality changes like the weather.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:06 AM
28

That Sharon Armstrong in the comments is a Thunder-fucking-Cunt. Fine example of a modern feminist I might add.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 11:59 PM
1

Yea but then nigglereddit would have to admit his bias is tied up in partisan bullshit. And we can't have him admitting his political shallowness, can we?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:10 PM
7

http://i.imgur.com/3o0Ph8d.jpg Good job trolling cunt.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:02 PM
3

Women pushing feminist rhetoric are not on our side.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:13 AM
7

MGM is issue that unfortunately if ever resolved satisfactorily will be resolved last among men's issues. It is culturally embedded, it hangs over the head of circumcised men when they talk about these things causing them to be defensive, it's propped up by faulty reasoning and pseudo-medical research, and even despite evidence that it has killed boys, it is still practiced regardless of those fatalities.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:36 AM
3

Pregnancy Pregnancy is not an issue of rights or suffering. Especially not now when its safer and easier than ever to give birth. Women can just not have children or adopt if they don't want to deal with a pregnancy. It's not something that has to be done, especially not today with our oversized population. These are things specific to that one gender. I know for a fact I would not want to be a woman in this day and age in certain states in the US. Being a woman in the first world is objectively…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:26 AM
13

Ah yes "benevolent sexism". The olympics winning move of all great mental gymnasts.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:05 PM
21

If you didn't want a kid, you could have worn a condom. Oh god you're hilarious. "If she didn't want a kid, she should have kept her whore legs closed." It's not a coincedence that shitheels like you argue against reproductive rights for men the same way pro-life zealots argue against abortion. Suck piss and choke cunt.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:06 PM
51

Note how offensive this is to the woman No consequences for your actions. Oh the horrors that beset women, damn patriarchy!
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:58 PM
5

There's good reason to have different changing rooms based merely in that some people are shy enough about their nudity around their own sex let alone the opposite. Telling people to die over 90 minutes swimming time? *white knights. If you're gonna concern troll, atleast have the common decency to not misrepresent what's said to do so, surely you can do better. And exactly like a feminist you gleefully cut away context about race and gender until they meet the frame of oppression you're trying …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:52 AM
3

“She’s a smart girl i congratulate her for aborting.” Even people who get abortions aren't proud of it, but feminists are bat shit insane, so...ya.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 02:47 AM
5

acid supposedly. Most acid would probably neutralize in water. But then I got a D in chemistry.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 02:39 AM
14

You know who else they banned from pools? "Those nasty niggers". http://i.imgur.com/S8XXqc6.jpg Lennon had it backwards, as it seems man is the nigger of the world. His seating is legislated, he's overtly discriminated against by authority, he's censured and banned from places designated as for the 'other better group' of people, his suffering is ignored, sometimes celebrated and so on, when he makes a sacrifice for others it's disregarded, his existence is only validated when it's useful to the…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 02:03 AM
28

The women-only sessions could be up to 90 minutes long - during which time men would be banned from the aquatic centre. The programme could also be introduced at Waterworld's hydrotherapy pool if there was sufficient demand, and reflected council's desire to be "as inclusive as possible", Bayliss said. I felt my fucking brain cells die. This is straight up discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 01:58 AM
5

This is beyond a double standard, it's fucking evil.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 10:29 PM
0

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=concern+troll
/r/MensRights02/05/14 09:20 PM
0

Look - all I'm saying is that /r/MensRights[1] already gets enough scrutiny. We don't need to give "them" more low-hanging-fruit, like this. Blah blah concern trolling.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:29 PM
8

Wow. Not to be "that guy," but I can't say that the people involved in the Bataan Death March would find that getting raped by their captors was their #1 fear. There is far worse stuff that can happen to a prisoner of war than being raped. Sorry if that's an unpopular statement, but I stand by it. Never mind even that roughly the same number of men are abused as women.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:58 PM
6

What do you mean make shit up, it's the jist of the entire article.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:57 PM
9

Their entire mindset is delusional and pathological. They're totally divorced from reality.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:53 PM
3

As far as I can tell slag is the british equivalent to bitch. I think.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:47 PM
1

it seems strange that a normally collectivist movement like feminism can, on a dime, become all about individualism when it suits them. You're really still surprised by the hypocrisy of feminists lol?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:39 PM
1

best friend So are you like a masochist or something?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:19 PM
2

When women joined the workforce(kind of a myth, they already had prior at the start of industrialization to a degree) they took factory jobs to support WW 1 and 2. They found out quickly that such work was grueling and dangerous, it's a no brainer that after the men got back that the women who still wanted to work took easier lower paying jobs, they knew their husbands would support them financially either way.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:17 PM
0

Also don't tell me what I am and am not as far as how I feel, I'll decide that fuck you very much.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:25 PM
1

You're right, I don't. I have no power or influence and most MRAs don't despise feminists as much as I do. Some of then are stupid enough to actually endorse feminism. I'm also not directing my hate at rape victims, but vicious and ignorant ideologues who do abuse and mistreat victims, male ones. Just like you to be this dense though.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:24 PM
2

Now? Kind of a big gap between nearly a century ago and now.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:03 AM
1

Good god I'm sick of seeing shit heads like you abuse no true scotsman like this. They. are. feminists. Many feminists, alot of them influential and powerful hate men. DEAL THE FUCK WITH IT. Take fucking responsibility for the blood on your hands when you call yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:38 AM
1

Yes, it couldn't have anything at all to do with what feminists say "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female. Or what they do. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2798/male-disposability-mary-p-koss-and-influencing-a-government-entity-to-erase-male-victims-of-rape/ It's just some misunderstanding by those stupid em ar ayzz. Eat shit.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:37 AM
-1

So I'd like to just come out and say right now, explicitly, that I do not consider man hating radicals to be real feminists. You can consider them what ever you want. They're still feminists just like all the man hating radical feminists leaders that have influenced feminist discourse over the years, many of them with more power and clout with feminism than you could possibly ever have, in that sense, the one that matters, they're more feminist than you will ever be. The other day I came across …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:35 AM
0

Just you krosen you fucking cunt.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:16 AM
2

/r/feminismformen http://i.imgur.com/ebPYP4q.jpg
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:12 AM
4

Honestly, I thought Obama was better than this, but I was wrong. You realize this is the president who covertly expanded the ability for military special forces to commit targeted killings outside of warzones and on US citizens even, right?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:28 PM
2

founder of Men's Rights uhh..
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:15 PM
0

It isn't about trust, it's about female privilege.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:52 AM
2

It seems weird that the husband wouldn't just trust his wife when they haven't had any issues with infidelity. mater semper certa est pater numquam The fucked up part is how this old saying is no longer true, fatherhood can be certain, but women are so insecure about infidelity that they lash out against men who want the same privilege women have knowing that their child is theirs for certain.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:51 AM
12

Bullshit, it's more than paranoia. The insecurity in men of raising a child not their's is totally justified when compared to the fact women know for certain that their kid is theirs. It makes the backlash against men who want to know their kid is theirs now when it's easier than ever all the more disgusting. Rubbing salt into a wound as old as humanity.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:47 AM
10

The tag should be female privilege. It's a toxic concept I know, the idea of class privilege and the like, but in this case it's black and fucking white undeniable. A woman pops out a brat, SHE KNOWS that it's hers. Short of her kid getting mixed up at the hospital, she knows for absolute positive total certainty. Mater semper certa est, a concept as old as fucking Rome, probably older. The only way a man could know a child was his prior to genetic testing was that his wife was a virgin when the…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:26 AM
4

God it's fucking terrifying that he's the vice president. He's a single death away from controlling the most powerful and influential nation on Earth, and he seems leagues worse than Obama when it comes to pandering to feminists and women.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:39 AM
4

*Entitled cunt. Call her what she is.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:31 AM
3

That is a lie spread by people who call themselves feminists but don't believe in equality at all. You say that as though feminism requires a belief in equality.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:28 AM
17

feminists, feminists, and fallacy.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:23 AM
108

chauvinistic manchildren misandry isn't real Who the fuck else uses language like that besides feminists?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:50 AM
20

Yes and no. Early feminism was toxic, maybe not as toxic as modern feminism, but the racism, indifferent sexism, and trademark use of shaming tactics to achieve their goals is right in line with the same ideological hardline shit we see today. Bigotry is the natural conclusion to indifference and resentment when left to fester. Early feminists probably wouldn't tell a male rape victim to kill himself, but they wouldn't give a flying fuck either and that's if they even believed men could be raped…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:49 AM
20

We need a word for these so-called "feminists" so real feminists don't get lumped in with these jackasses. Enlighten yourself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman It's bad enough with feminists using this dishonest piss poor argument, we don't need people who supposedly care about men's rights shifting blame from where it belongs, squarely at the feet of feminists.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:08 AM
1

Jesus fucking christ it's just amazing how they can keep ratcheting up the insulting hyperbole.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:00 PM
2

Just goes to show the new "left" was as batshit insane then as it is now. Also, the traditional female position of women in society is analogous to a gilded cage. It's not freedom, but it's not the constant threat of death most men have typically lived with throughout history.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:51 PM
2

If you're a single woman looking for a hotel room with free hair straighteners, yoga mats and no interruptions from unwelcome male guests, go somewhere else other than Denmark. If you're a white person looking for a hotel with free extraneous accommodations with no interruptions from unwelcome negro guests, go somewhere else.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:47 PM
10

Don't listen to crimson. He's essentially whining about "reposts". Not everyone has seen this and that graphic will likely enlighten some people or atleast get them interested in men's rights, you did good.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:14 AM
4

I particularly like how Point 8 was pointed out: our society's long-lingering positive stereotype of women having a 'higher, more mental, more spiritual' sex drive than men is one of the main elements of society's demonization of male sexuality. Something feminists are very much against. /s
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:57 PM
26

Your "patriarchy" is in every way analogous to how zealous Christians think of the devil. If you can't be bothered to articulate and reason out an intelligent reason or understanding to something 'must'a been that ol' patriarchy'. You're an intellectual cripple.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:40 PM
6

WOOOOOORLLLL STAAARRR!!!!
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:11 AM
6

I see ACTUAL feminism is an equality movement Actual feminism, or True feminism as it were. And that's not how feminism is seen, it's demonstrably how it is.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:13 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/self/comments/1xbvpx/hello_i_am_a_woman_mother_of_3_and_cardiologist/[3] Uhh, whats with this one?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:35 AM
-2

I never claimed I did, so don't speak on my behalf motherfucker. Quit indulging false flag troll posts.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:25 PM
4

No shit women are diagnosed more, women actually have systems of support to fall back on, if a man has a problem and he does anything besides "man up" he's a pussy/faggot. So again, no shit women are diagnosed more often.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:24 PM
2

Women Are Diagnosed with PTSD More than Men Hehe
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:19 PM
7

Advocating for the rights of men makes you de facto anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:18 PM
0

Is this angst necessary?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:16 PM
-1

I edited my original comment. You're telling me some MRA author we've never heard of who includes nothing to prove existence of this book on top of all these weird stereotypes feminists love to plaster MRAs with on top of a 2 hour old account is supposed to be for real? This is a shit test. This is feminists trolling this sub as usual using the presumption of suicide to try to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:13 PM
-5

So...you're autistic, have aspergers, the only time you've been laid is by a prostitute, you admit some kind of disdain for women, you're an introvert, you claim some kind of "higher understanding" that others don't have, and your account is 2 hours old. You missed the part about owning a collection of fedoras. If you're for real, do what blindpelican says, if you're not, go fuck yourself femicunt.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:06 PM
0

I'm starting to think you can't help yourself. You're so used to derailing a conversation and getting away with it you just don't know what to do.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:05 PM
-1

the less people will believe you represent this sub. Well that's peculiar, I thought we were talking about the MRM as a whole, now we're back to "just the internet". You can't seem to make up your mind.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:55 PM
0

Apparently I hit a nerve.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:51 PM
-1

More red herring. Quit trying to sidestep the subject here, but then if you did that you might have to actually admit you're wrong. And we can't have that.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:29 PM
-1

I gotta ask, how come every time someone challenges you, you resort to red herring. So if I go to pay pal and donate 99 cents to CAFE will I magically have some credentials. Who knew that's all it takes. Your dishonesty is typical and pathetic.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:27 PM
0

People like you are a cancer with in the men's rights community, the sooner cut out the better.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:00 PM
-1

I don't owe a feminist sympathizing piece of shit like you a damn thing. Edit: also, and once again when challenged you set some arbitrary goal as a hallmark and then pat yourself on the back when no one takes the bait. Who's the troll again.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:59 PM
1

gender feminists So basically virtually every major feminist voice that has mattered in the last 40 or so years. These "equity feminists" sound like nothing more than fools who can't accept the reality of the ideology they've devoted their life too.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:58 PM
-1

Like a member of the NAACP who claims to not be anti-kkk but guess who shows up to brown shirt and "protest" things the NAACP does. The MRM is inherently anti-feminist and feminism by it's very nature is anti-mens rights.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:56 PM
0

We in the Mens Rights Movement recognize Feminism as a hateful, bigoted, and destructive ideology which undermines the civil society by pitting women against men and against their own interests. There are issues with the feminist movement that are obvious to anyone who truly believes in equality. I appreciate you proving my point.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:54 PM
0

The MRM does not set out to intentionally oppose feminism, no person in their right mind would intentionally deal with any feminist without good reason, that doesn't mean they're not anti-feminist, merely by supporting men's rights you are anti-feminist. Who is the real obstacle? It would be shitheels like you.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:51 PM
-1

It's not a matter of speaking for anyone, it's an observation of reality. in Toronto Funny since Canada seems to play host to the best displays of how simply promoting men's rights puts you at odds with feminists. Again, enjoy burying your head in the sand, quit dragging the rest of us down with you.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:49 PM
0

If you If you pay attention to reality you see that the MRM is inherently anti-feminist. Our most common issues are related to feminist ideas and policy, our most common opponents are feminists, some of the worst discrimination against men is committed by feminists. Merely not being a feminist puts you at odds with feminism, nevermind criticizing and questioning it. They're not our biggest obstacle though, our biggest obstacle is fools like you.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:44 PM
12

That's because feminism is like a secular religion.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:05 PM
0

Most MRAs are anti-feminist, deal with it. Most of us are intelligent enough to see the writing on the wall instead of burying our heads in the sand. plenty of MRAs who aren't anti-feminist. Plenty of fools.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:54 PM
-2

We are anti-feminist, and most of us do hate feminism. And why shouldn't we? I guess the NAACP is a hate group because they hate the KKK.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:53 PM
-1

because I'm a proud MRA You've got a peculiar definition of pride. But I do think that there are places where feminism can fight a good fight without attacking men or mens rights. Yea, and thanks to nazis we understand things about hypothermia we didn't before. When conservative states are outlawing abortions, I'll support feminist resistance to those laws (Although, I also want a financial abortion for men). I could honestly give a fuck less about petty political wedge issue bullshit feminists …
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:55 AM
-5

as long as the MRM is viewed as a primarily anti-feminist movement There is no view to it. The MRM is inherently anti-feminist. Our most common enemy are feminists, our biggest hurdles are issues created by feminists and feminist policy. we will always be viewed as reactionary to feminism. We are reactionary. Because men's rights have been trampled and attacked by feminists. There are some MRA's who want feminism to "fucking die", but there are also feminists who want to kill all men. Yes, that'…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:14 AM
1

Supporting men's rights runs directly contrary to feminism.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:36 AM
6

How can we work together when something like this happens? We're not working together. And we're not going to either. Personally I want to see feminism FUCKING DIE. But no matter how you cut it or feel about it, the MRM and feminism are wholly and entirely incompatible. Feminism presupposes woman good, man bad. Women first, men probably never if that consideration.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:26 AM
1

In the minds of these campus feminists you can only speak in their space, using their language, and by their rules. Where have we heard this before? Nazism, or really any fascist ideology. That's not an exaggeration, that is exactly how fascism operates, and it's exactly what feminists are. That makes their power to influence law and policy all the more frightening.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:23 AM
9

First, I believe it IS sexist. Believe it all you want, you're not just subjectively wrong, you're factually wrong.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:22 PM
15

'Because men can't be raped.'
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:47 PM
8

Feminism is a cancer. Unlike other cancers though this is one that spreads, not one you just get.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 02:34 AM
6

That's the thing. I keep hearing these stories about how women are sexually aggressive, particularly stories from women and gay men. You don't hear the same from the average man because he's told that if it does happen he should count himself lucky.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:15 AM
5

I'm thinking maybe the next time I see you stalking someone in this sub I'm just gonna report you to the mods and let them sort you out.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:13 AM
1

Modern female equivalent to greeks.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:12 AM
5

Said the weirdo stalking someone on the internet because they said mean things. ;_;
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:40 PM
1

Sounds typically feminist.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:39 PM
2

Artist uses talent Generous.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:38 PM
4

It's true. Men don't suffer as much, because you can't suffer if you're dead.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:30 PM
29

Holy shit, the fucking stones, THE FUCKING STONES. "Lol fuck nice guys, they act nice but they're really just all pieces of shit, cus patriarchy" "I'm tired of emotionally unfulfilling flings with everything with a pulse" "I want a nice guy D:" Die lonely and bitter you fucking hag.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:17 PM
7

Being totally honest I'm not sure. I swear I heard once they were men in drag mocking temperance suffragettes. But if it is mocking, it's a poe. The prohibitionists and their suffragette crossovers were fucking wacko, see: Carrie Nation.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:03 PM
18

Angry ugly feminist ranting and raving from atop an ivory tower of self-righteousness. Carrying on a grand and old tradition.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:43 PM
6

Which is why I guess they proposed suffrage for women at a time when many men could not vote unless they met a very specific criteria as opposed to full adult suffrage, which labor unions of the time did. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/pankhurst-the-white-feather-betrayal-of-history/ Nevermind all the racism and and overbearing christian zealotry.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:27 PM
2

There's no justification for creating a rights movement in a vacuum of organized rights movements which focuses on women regarding issues that affect men and women. Especially since most of the suffragettes were typically pretty racist as well.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:24 PM
11

That's because for all intents and purposes feminism has become a religion. http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/23ij7t/for_the_third_time_in_two_years_feminists_at_a/cgxjeoo Adding to that, like religion it's something people are taught from a young age, taught that it's always good and never wrong. Feminism is the religion of worshiping women and men are the devil in that religion.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:48 AM
5

More like some pathetic accountability sidestepping and grade school debate class fallacies to excuse and justify feminism's bigotry.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:34 AM
3

You realize they're talking about the comments under the article, right? Tell me you aren't this fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:04 PM
3

You proved that if you call up feminist organizations they'll pour honey through the phone line into your ear. You want a fucking cookie? Talk is cheap, and when we've done more than talk, feminists have acted against us. Don't you dare fucking pretend like they give a shit about men or their rights because their secretaries didn't treat you like shit over the phone.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:27 PM
-3

thought-out http://i.imgur.com/Gyy3aWJ.gif
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:18 PM
5

You never had a case to begin with cunt.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:11 PM
2

Feminists literally died to give women the right to vote The only sufferagette I know of who died a non-natural death was Emily Davison, and she was trampled by a horse. Hyperbole and lie more pls. Also, a congress of men at the behest of female and male political activists gave women the right to vote, you history rewriting cunt. to be seen as actual human beings who can do things outside of childcare and housekeeping. Feminists fought and changed the system for women to be able to wear pants. …
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:06 PM
2

Focus on the people who infringe on the rights of men(feminists), think anyone who identifies as a feminist is a bigot. You don't see the connection or the rather incredible mental gymnastics you performed? You strike me as someone still coming to terms that all you were told as a kid about how "feminists just want equality" is bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:17 PM
2

Only the bad things done by feminism get noticed here, and people start to think literally anyone who identifies as feminist is an evil female supremacist. But of course, it's only natural that a sub about mens rights would focus on the people who infringe upon those rights.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:44 PM
5

feminism done right No such thing. The things done to men in the name of feminism are unforgivable. The baby is dead and the bathwater is acid.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:27 PM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:56 PM
-2

I know quite a few of you folks lean to the right Try again. Though if you wanted to be accurate, most of this sub is libertarian. Some of us are true egalitarians Ah yes, spit on us untrue egalitarians from your ivory tower of Scottish righteousness. Suck piss cunt-nugget. Not everything is from the red menace coming to get you. Feminism is our biggest opponent. When discussing feminism the fact that they have a decidedly class warfare based view of things, a conceptualization originating with …
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:17 AM
1

Never said that actually.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:37 AM
2

Using sock puppets to vote and echo your own posts will earn you a shadowban, fyi.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:54 PM
10

No, it's not actually. What's weird is your thought process. Even as adults nudity and sex are two separate things. It's possible for someone to be naked without sexual connotations, especially children whom you shouldn't even associate sexual connotations to clothed or not. Your mindset, this popular american mind set, is indicative of a COMPLETELY warped view on sexuality and nudity.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:29 PM
14

Messaged them. Let's see if they respond. Money is on not. Edit: 3 hours, no response. Edit2: and banned, lol.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:23 PM
3

I'm all for forcefully conscripting such people and posting them to the most dangerous military positions we have.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:17 PM
16

Yes...there's no precedent for authoritarian censorship by leftists... You need to crack a history book.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:13 PM
0

If I had to be honest, I wouldn't have a choice to say anything other than that I've wasted most of my life so far. In fact, I've nearly destroyed it. I always wanted to do good things, big things, and I always wanted to really be somebody. Instead, when I look back at my life and what I've done, I only feel embarrassment and regret. So many wasted opportunities, so many blown chances. So many 'could-have-beens'. I'm 21 Err... You got atleast a good 6 or 7 decades likely ahead of you.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:08 PM
0

RoK aren't MRAs so much as PUAs, that said I don't really much care how much women sleep around. women shouldn't be proud of being fat. No one should be proud of being fat. That said women are told no matter how they look, no matter how healthy or unhealthy they are they're "beautiful". Meanwhile a man with a beer gut is about like a leper. What? Women are strongly dependent on the government yea, typically in the form of free this, free that, meanwhile men get shit. Women should be ashamed that…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:49 AM
1

I still hate feminists more.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:37 AM
52

Wil is an aging d list celebrity desperately trying to hold on to what attention he still gets via being an internet famous name. He's a social justice warrior, these pieces of shit and their ridiculous ideas should not be tolerated. Fuck wil wheaton.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:34 PM
0

Plenty of men have 'tits' and a fair number of women are flat chested. Dana is presented as a woman, looks like a woman. Someone like Andrej even for his slender frame and feminine facial traits is still thought of and presented as a man. I told you I'm not getting into this trans arguing shit with you. Fuck off and die cunt.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 10:36 PM
2

Yeah so does Andrej Pejic but only a sexist would declare that someone being a woman is based on them living up to their preconcieved stereotype. I'm not gonna fucking get into it with you over trans shit. Andrej is a feminine man. He's got no tits for vag. Dana is a feminine trans woman. She's more woman than man. Eww. I'd prefer to pretend I didn't read that. Aww poor baby doesn't like dealing with the concept of neoteny. Fact is many woman are naturally neotenous. It affects how they're treat…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 10:27 PM
1

Trans? What does it matter. She looks like a woman, sounds like a woman, has the neoteny of a woman. Unless someone knew, and even then. Whatever she is, she's a social justice sacred cow. If she did abuse her wife, it would go unnoticed but for the fact she works for a major company.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 10:12 PM
1

blatantly misogynistic Because criticism of feminism makes you a woman hater...somehow...
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:48 PM
1

Feminism is a deconstruction and critique of traditionalism...as it affects women. Don't dare fucking pretend like feminists give a fuck about how men are treated.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:45 PM
1

"false feminists" you know, like "not true feminists". Your premise is shit to begin with, so don't bother.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:41 PM
1

I'm not an MRA, and I'm not a feminist either. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. Ooh you don't abide by labels, ooh look out guys.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:35 PM
1

including how masculinity is something innately toxic If you want proof that this movie isn't pro-men's rights. It's right in front of your face. Anytime feminists discuss feminity they use words like "mystic" and "divine", they talk about their uterus as though it's a religious idol. When they talk about masculinity, they say things like "toxic" and "the end of men" and so on. If you can't see the writing on the wall at this point you either don't want to, or you're not paying attention.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:24 PM
-2

factual feminist That's an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:20 PM
1

You use the word "misogyny" as though it has any meaning anymore.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:18 PM
2

My sister is a while, middle class woman who is a hardcore feminist. Of course she is. Your sister is a raging cunt. And there's no cure for being a cunt.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:15 PM
0

Get a new fucking doctor and tell this cunt to go fuck herself.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:24 PM
1

We all know it's a generic cry of "GRRM is gonna fucking kill off everyone", but that's not feminists see when they see it. I've seen them repeat it in earnest.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:26 PM
15

IF WE DIDN'T WANT TO FUCK YOU, YOU'D HAVE NOTHING Except that is the reality. If men as a whole had no sexual intentions towards women there'd be little reason for men to treat women any differently to men or have anything to do with them at all.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:21 PM
6

The most effective thing we can do is to continue to make our case. Pretty much everytime feminists open their mouths against us they make our case. Whether it's argumentative censor, and slander, or brownshirting tactics, like what they did at university of toronto.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:38 AM
10

You can no more teach a feminist to care about the rights of men than you can teach a christian that atheism is not a path to hell.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:55 PM
16

Bigots generally do think of themselves as 'in the right'.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:51 PM
-3

the new left is no longer about liberty and freedom. Now they are about moderating and tampering offense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtBvQj2k6xo It's secular religion is what it is. It's got it's own holy scriptures, sins, dogma, and stratification of approved thinking. Anything not within that vein of thinking is heresy and is punished by immediate retaliation and backlash in the typical form most zealots do, censure, and slander, and if that doesn't work, violence.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:57 PM
15

It's not really about judging either side of the case. As jp said it Feminists often like to downplay the fact that domestic violence is as high in lesbian couples as it is in heterosexual couples, which is an awkward fact to acknowledge when they are trying to claim it is men who are the abusers. It's an example of how feminism's rabid anti-male prejudice can hurt even more than men. Feminism is good for no one.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:54 PM
2

Because feminism is religion, rape is sin, and having an even or fair mind about investigating rape means you're a heretic.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 04:12 PM
19

God feminists are so fucking toxic.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 04:01 PM
-4

Their claim is enough. You didn't learn a damn thing from your interaction with those authoritarian assholes.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:40 AM
7

The only real difference between radfems and white supremacists is atleast white supremacists aren't so cowardly to rely on (typically state) proxy violence.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:37 AM
1

futon Eh?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:46 PM
-2

The gay rights movement depends on the minimized role of fathers in families Gay men don't real yo.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:34 PM
-3

The one by Barbara Jordan is the highpoint of irony.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:17 PM
17

It's not so much that as that they typically believe themselves incapable of prejudice or bigotry.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:14 PM
45

/r/lgbt was infiltrated by authoritarian SRS cunts long ago. Do not give that shithole the time of day. /r/ainbow
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:12 PM
10

Well, A, I dunno about you, but it's sort of hard to bathe well in extended situations like deployments or other jobs that don't really allow for it. Literally all you need is access to running water, if you don't have that your genitals not getting washed is the least of your issues, asinine.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:53 AM
18

And the main reason why someone would say "No" once they are old enough, is because they realize it hurts. You know, like being molested, raped, physically abused, or abandoned. Didn't we just fucking cover this.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:01 AM
25

I think I was relieved of some potential hygiene issues God forbid you casually run water and soap over your genitals. I take it that washing your nethers isn't a typical part of your daily grooming routine. I got news for you, you probably do have hygiene issues if that's the case. More asinine justifications please. I think it just looks better. I'm sure you would have been happy to mutilate that ant-eater off as a teenager though right? Thought not. At any rate, I know that if it were put off…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:59 AM
15

On their fucking genitals, a removal that is totally unnecessary.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:57 AM
2

Actually, I recall feminists celebrating that men could officially be included as victims now Mhmm, I believe you. One MRA and one Feminist teamed together to make certain... Intentionally vague? And you want to focus on the woman who thought we should hear out the men claiming that raping them wouldn't be a crime at all? (Although she disagreed, and still thought it was a crime?) The fuck are you on about? Did you intentionally word this like someone having a seizure?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:54 AM
2

Other feminist spaces tend to ban users for claiming feminists don't give a shit about male rape victims, because they're really sick of dealing with liars. Guess that's why there was all that feminist backlash against Koss for erasing half a nation's rape vict-...ooh yea...neeevermind.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:30 AM
2

There are no fighting words in feminist spaces, because even the most benign dissent tends to be stomped into the fucking mud, I.E. censored, banned, bullied, or otherwise forcefully censured. E.G. /r/Feminism
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:00 AM
17

It's the same mentality your typical religious person has. Male privilege, original sin. Is it because you haven’t fully interrogated your own linguistic habits? Is it because you haven't heard the good word of our lord and savior jesus christ? The self-flagellation and aggrandizement of women like they're divine beings. Femininity is the god, patriarchy theory is the bible.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:07 PM
2

I know, but you're severely misled if you honestly believe feminism and the MRM could ever seriously work together. Feminism is the most common variable when it comes to issues men face, whether it's creating new problems where there were none, or exacerbating issues that simply relate back to how society has traditionally operated. Frankly, if there is to be any meaningful progress in terms of gender equality, or men or women, feminism has to either change drastically, or die. It's just that si…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:03 AM
4

I'm glad you framed it that way. I think we're all familiar with that ol' duluth wheel, the ones describing various forms of "domestic abuse" men so often committed against their wives according to feminists. http://i.imgur.com/ZTAlMzj.jpg Let's take a look see at the "marriage" of the MRM and feminism shall we. Using coercion and threats Well, where to begin. I suppose one place to start chronologically would be the death threats levied against Erin Pizzey after she suggested much of DV against…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:11 AM
4

The evolution of Feminism over it's history has been towards inclusiveness. This is an elaborate joke right?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:56 PM
2

That's not "rape culture" it's tribal culture. Problems like elders passing judgement on people in their villages, wisely or ignorantly will disappear with modernization. It's a painful process and the west should know that. Frankly the inumerable poor and "low class" who are treated like less than dirt, male or female, aka the rigid and brutal class system seems like a bigger issue than westerners screwing up a country already properly screwed by a previously imperial western country.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:07 PM
3

This phenomenon imo is the result of women flattering theirselves. Gyms typically require membership, as such people are literally paying to be there, taking time out of their schedules to work out. Chances are men are not looking at you, and to insist as much is vain self-aggrandization. They can ogle you for free outside, why would they take time out of their workout to look at you on their own time and dollar.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:26 AM
7

There is rape culture - In India. Which part, the sensationalized western news articles that extrapolate handfuls of incidents of rape out of a fucking sub-continent containing more than a billion people, or the policies about rape that in some cases allow a woman to say she was raped if a man refuses to marry her.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:16 AM
17

It's cold out, wear a coat Don't tell me to wear a coat, tell the weather to stop being cold. etc to the others.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:14 AM
8

It's so ludicrous it's actually hilarious.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:33 AM
6

Circumcised penises are not supposed to look like that. Penises aren't supposed to be circumcised.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:08 PM
25

This talking point among the pro-circumcision crowd about how women like it is just morbidly sexist, evil even.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:13 AM
8

Those people are just fucking disgusting. It's not even just that they're for circumcision and laugh about it, but that they're so antagonistic about it.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:08 AM
1

*MRAs You just said "I hear Men's Rights Movements..." MRAs, men's rights advocate.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 12:47 AM
3

Why is being able to adjust a sign of intelligence? Why is that a metric of intelligence? That's such an arbitrary metric for intelligence. Wisdom maybe, but intelligence?
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:19 PM
8

Is this the same guy who has a circumcision fetish.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:19 AM
1

/r/socialism Judging by the CSS it looks like /r/communism invaded. Which is appropriate and horrific.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:13 AM
6

The father didn't know that, could have been going for anything. What kind of fucking idiot doesn't do what they're told when they've got a fucking gun pointed at them?
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:41 AM
17

One of the mods is an SRS'er. Just fyi. The rest probably are two just on different accounts.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:34 AM
-1

I almost said something really stupid and angry. Instead, I'll report your comment so the mods will see it sooner, in fact I'll message them right now. Ha-fucking-ha.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:28 AM
8

I can't name any Western country in the world where you can shoot an intruder dead without reasonable perception of force against yourself He told the kid not to move, and he reached for something.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:18 PM
32

Top comment summed it up better than I've seen since I first heard this story. She told her Dad he was an intruder, she knew better. This is like the plantation owner's daughter crying rape after a fun night with the field hand.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:17 PM
7

Which is a way of saying "eye rape" as some feminists have called it, or as normal people refer to it "someone stared at you".
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:20 PM
1

As I said, it was more for me than you, I know I can't cure your ignorance, it's rooted into who you are.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:14 PM
3

Continued How the fuck does criminalizing, making it a fucking felony no less, help anyone, especially the child, after all that's what we always hear "it's for the child". But this rabid vindictiveness towards "deadbeat fathers" that is so rife in feminist rhetoric proves it has nothing to do with the child, it's about weaponizing the law for bitter scored ex wives. No idea who he is, or who they are. I believe I would probably share your opinion on them to some extent, but for the same reason …
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:05 PM
3

The first link actually seems like a full on rape appologist, meaning that she doesn't think rape is a thing at all? Not entirely sure. Even if she were just limiting it to men however, it still cannot apply to feminism, else fallacy of composition. Also, the link you provided had nothing to do with what you said it did. She thinks rape is a thing...for women, or men who have been anally raped by other men. In other words women don't rape. The first link actually seems like a full on rape appolo…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 08:27 PM
3

If men make on average 33% more than women, women should be given raises, so as to make it roughly equal. The wage gap is not a matter of discrimination. If women as a group want to get payed on average as much as men as a group, then women need to get off their asses work the dangerous hard labor jobs, ask for raises, take risks, and work as much as men, till then quit whining about non-issue bullshit and propagating lies. Similarly, women should be forced to pay alimony if the children are awa…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:46 AM
2

a product of canadian acedemia. Well there's your why of it.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:06 AM
1

Men go their own way. After taking the red pill (realizing the actual situation of men in society today), people tend to form into three kinds of groups: PUA, MRA, and MGTOW... MGTOW attempt to be legally free and do what they want in the status quo believing that change won't be coming for a while, so they might as well take care in the meantime. For some, this means they become aware of the issues and avoid the worst situations. For others, it means they avoid marriage as dangerous and often a…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:16 AM
3

Take this as you will, but the more she shows her ass, the better chance you stand. Family courts are a nightmare for men near universally. It may take her doing and saying god awful horrible things for you to get anything.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:14 PM
3

calls to legal protection of falsely accused. Now we wait for bloated, angry, white, western feminists to weigh in and tell us all how this is some evil "patriarchal" scheme to rape women.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:33 PM
8

on top of that she is verbally attacking my wife and my family. Record, document, record, document, record, document. You'll need this information.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:32 PM
6

Disgusting. No, not even disgusting, enraging. Fuck these people right to hell.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:27 PM
5

Fuck that. Women liking cut dicks is too often used as an excuse for MGM, it's an implicit condonement of MGM.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:25 PM
8

That person is an SRS'er.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:52 PM
2

Eat shit.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:44 PM
2

Not feeling like a victim does not make you not a victim.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:41 PM
7

circumcision has shown to reduce HPV transmission rates And flaying someone alive reduces skin cancer rates, what's your fucking point. And as 46n2arejustaheadofme put it Male circumcision is unequivocally genital mutilation, and men who had their foreskins removed in infancy were victims of MGM, even if they don't recognize it. The words mutilation and victim are not defined by "feeling mutilated" or "feeling like a victim," and unfortunately many men are unable to or unwilling to recognize thi…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:48 AM
13

Logically a victim is someone who feels victimized. Victimization has nothing to do with how you feel. Just like there are men who are tormented later in life due to having their dicks cut as babies without their permission, there are in fact rape victims out there who brush theirselves off and move on like it was nothing. How you feel about it has little to do with whether something is really a victimizing incident/crime. "I got mugged today, lost my wallet, but I don't feel like a victim, so I…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:45 PM
3

FOAD troll.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:55 PM
18

You are a victim, you don't have to feel any damn way about it. I wasn't given a choice does not make me a victim. I want you to sit down and think for a second, not feel, fucking use your head.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:52 PM
3

You really are a fucking troll. Get the fuck out of this sub.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:42 PM
2

Yes, you were mutilated against your will as a child in a pointless pseudo-medical procedure on par in legitimacy as lobotomizing people.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:30 PM
10

It is the mutilation of the genitals, it's medical in the same sense a lobotomy is medical.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:18 PM
15

I don't say this to argue for circumcision. I say this to argue against making circumcised men into victims. Men circumcised against their will are victims, it is what it is.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:16 PM
8

Still supporting and advocating the violation of the rights of boys and men I see. God you're a real piece of shit.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:04 PM
17

2012 SWEDISH PAEDIATRIC SOCIETY Circumcision of young boys for religious and non-medical reasons ought to be banned in Sweden. "We consider it to be an assault on these boys," said Staffan Janson, chairman of the committee for ethical issues and childrens' rights. Children are unable to form a decision in the matter. Circumcision is an attack on boys' integrity. "It's such a complicated and difficult question, but even so, we've decided that this is a procedure to be done away with," Janson said…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:00 PM
15

I didn't do that. I minimized circumcision and exaggerating actual genital mutilation. I didn't mention gender at all. Blah blah bullshit. Circumcision is genital mutilation, deal with it. And it is absolutely helpful[1] . It's actually recommended. It's also discouraged by other medical organizations, either way it doesn't fucking matter if MGM makes men ejaculate flower scented liquid gold cum that cures cancer, it IS NOT FUCKING WARRANTED. There's these things called basic human rights, you o…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:22 PM
1

They're not directed at you, the person they are, is comfortable with the jokes and ribbing and is certain they don't bother her. Getting offended on another's behalf when they don't want or need your indignation makes you a jackass.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:06 PM
43

That person is fucking sick. The fight against MGM is such an uphill battle it's just unreal. Between the average person's apathy or in the case of many cut men, seeming angry psychological defense against it, it's just so frustrating.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:54 PM
26

Saying circumcision counts as genital mutilation is an insult to anyone who has actually suffered genetal mutilation. It is genital mutilation, the insult here is your minimizing MGM while exaggerating FGM. It's unethical, unnecessary, damaging, barbaric, and a violation of a person's basic human rights to bodily integrity, I don't give a shit if FGM is commonly defined as the genital disemboweling of new born girls, circumcision is GENITAL MUTILATION, the fucking end. I'm getting pretty tired o…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:52 PM
1

Fuck off back to againstmensrights you piece of fucking scum.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:40 PM
3

He's not asking anyone to "brigade". That was my first thought as well but his language is neutral and his concerns real. Edit: lol neeeeeeevermind. Didn't see this on my phone. 227 posts in SRS. How about you go fuck yourself concern troll. Honestly the balls on you concern trolling about us brigading.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:16 PM
1

The DSM is beginning to resemble the tax code. A bloated manual that's been politically abused to the point of uselessness.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:28 AM
1

Something doesn't have to be an issue of rights or sexism or where blame can be placed on a person or group for it to be an issue of concern for those who care about the well being of men and boys. You're being purposely obtuse. But if you need a fetish to poke with needles so bad, men and boys health concerns are routinely ignored or in the case of many boys misdiagnosed.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:27 AM
12

Oophorectomy is the word you're looking for I think.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:09 AM
11

phallo-logocentric Is that even a fucking word? Edit: In critical theory and deconstruction, phallogocentrism or phallocentrism is a neologism coined by Jacques Derrida to refer to the privileging of the masculine (phallus) in the construction of meaning. Yup, total post-modernist pseudo-intellectual horse shit.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:05 AM
3

I don't know who this Larkey guy is but I like him already.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:07 AM
4

Oh god lol. I think that's an honest to god fedora, not a bowler or sun hat, a freaking fedora.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:59 PM
1

This is a real issue, but you're not fixing it. Yea in case you didn't notice it wouldn't be an issue if not for feminism. Again, feminism demonizing men. What rights? "They've thrown abused men and boys under the bus to reserve funding and legal protection for women. They've done the same with male rape victims, and victims of female rapists. At the same time, they've attacked the due process rights of men accused of rape, creating for the falsely accused an undue risk of false arrest, false pr…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:48 PM
1

You know what main-stream feminism fights against? The perception that males can't be raped, or that women can't rape. The idea that men can't be the victims of abuse, and that women can't be abusers. Feminism puts the onus of rape entirely on men via propaganda "men can stop rape" and "teach men not to rape". http://www.genderratic.com/p/2551/male-privilege-defining-male-victims-out-of-existence/ Feminism has blood on it's hands. Generations of blood. Men ignored and forgotten to further deify …
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:16 PM
5

This shit just needs to be outright deleted.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:07 PM
2

You gotta appreciate the irony of femen. "Objectifying women is wrong, stop staring at my tits and ass" And the only meaningful protest they can come up with is getting naked and screaming for attention.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:10 AM
0

Who cares.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:58 AM
2

That's untrustworthy feminists - male or female, not to mention their various enablers. ABR has nothing to do with gender (other than it's more essential for males to ABR than females). Yea bullshit. We know that a man accusing someone of doing them harm is not taken half as seriously as if it were a woman. It's all too easy for women to slander and falsely accuse and get results.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:54 AM
5

Intentional contrarianism needs to be defined with trolling, why haven't you been banned yet.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:48 AM
-2

[Suggestion] Ban concern trolls. Get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 10:43 PM
4

I think thats why I always watch for that kinda thought process here. Feminists as an identified group seems to anger a lot of people here, justified or not, and it really steers up hate. No MRA or MRM organization has worked to erase female victims from existence, and not even the most bitter red piller fantasizes about female genocide. SO FUCK YOU, YES WE'RE FUCKING ANGRY AND WE HAVE A FUCKING RIGHT TO BE.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 10:39 PM
1

Point out that the wage gap doesn't reflect reality in a capitalist economy. Say you're an employer, the boss of a business. Who do you hire, the man you have to pay 33 cents more or the woman you can shortchange. If their existed a discriminatory wage gap no employer would hire men unless they absolutely had to, and since the workplace is not overwhelmingly women, there's no way women are being commonly shortchanged.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:36 AM
0

ADD and ADHD is not a condition widely affecting anyone, it's an over diagnosed nearly made up disorder so doctors can write more subscriptions.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:28 AM
27

The same reason the KKK wasn't a hate group in the early 1900s. It's culturally entrenched, socially approved. Politicians, professors, lawyers, celebrities, law enforcement, etc.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:10 AM
-2

Feminists love mob violence. In theory anyway. Most of these hairy "fat positive" land whales probably can't fit back out of the doorways of their apartments, too much time spent "fighting the evil patriarchy" by whining on their blogs.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:03 AM
13

Being born with a y chromosome or not enough melanin makes you evil, didn't you know.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:53 PM
5

Just a fine example of how zealous and absurd the "progressive" feminist crowd can be and it's affect on men. Angry women with beating sticks violently beating random men based off he-said, she-said, it's like a feminist fantasy.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:42 PM
1

/r/theredpill subreddit are like /r9k/ douchebros. /r/thebluepill subreddit are like shrill rad fem shit heels.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:18 PM
-2

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2198v0/what_controversial_subreddit_do_you_frequent_and/cgb7pcq?context=3
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:17 PM
7

Feminism is an ideology, a belief. The thought that it was ever compatible with skepticism just speaks to how deeply ingrained into the psyche feminism has become. You've all likely seen the typical response to a criticism of feminism, that it's misogyny. That's it's prejudiced towards women to question an ideology and belief system that is in and of itself not women. Feminism is like religion for a lot of people
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:13 PM
6

Vapid selfish entitled western women praising the genital mutilation of men and boys. Disgusting doesn't quite cover it.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:03 PM
3

Change the locks.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:01 PM
2

The punishment for this sort of thing needs to be severe. Life imprisonment strikes me as a good place to start. Death row is not out of the question.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:52 PM
22

SRS: 145 posts SRSsucks: 34 posts Mod of /r/TheBluePill Major feminist cunt. But you didn't need me to tell you that.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:46 PM
5

Who said I was talking about all cops? I know not all cops are pigs, but nothing is done about the ones who are.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:05 AM
3

Toxic. What exactly is so toxic about it. The fact that it doesn't jive with the dogma you were taught. Feminism demonizes men, erases male victims from the public consciousness, and promotes misandry in policy and rhetoric. Go bury your head in the sand if it makes you feel better, but the rest of us won't, we don't have that luxury.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:05 AM
33

This can't be emphasized enough, this was attempted murder by proxy. We all just saw how police handle a guy with a knife, it's a wonder they didn't bring a tank for this guy. Fucking pigs.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:09 AM
17

That author is quite the fucking moron. You're being nice. The author is a fucking bigot, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:54 AM
3

This appears to be inaccurate. Except that pattern of policy is informed through out the west, so much so even RAINN spoke out against it. You appear to be using "feminism" as a synonym of "misandry" Feminism is essentially a synonym for misandry. and you're not doing anything other than masking it by conflating it in this manner. Identifying the primary culprit you mean.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:52 AM
1

So feminist after feminist can rig the system and wreck generations of men's lives all in the name of feminism yet you can't suss out the common variable.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:45 PM
1

Yea, I wonder where Koss and her ilk could have conjured up the notion that women can't rape men.... I fucking wonder. Your ability to ignore the elephant in the room is nothing short of amazing cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:34 PM
1

Feminist here. Language can be ambiguous, and I think it has to be discerned from context which is meant in both cases — "female rape" may just as well refer to rapes committed by females as rapes committed against females. So usually people tend to specify more clearly, and then subsequently go for a shorter descriptor. There's no ambiguity to it, it's about empathy. When you say "female rape" a person's mind will almost always go to thoughts of women as victims and men as perpetrators, whereas…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:33 PM
1

I think the striking nature of the video compels them to give the issue lip service. Remember that this is the sub which deletes top level comments which don't jive with popular rhetoric. They'll pretend like they give a damn now while the video trends and later they'll talk about how they can teach men not to rape.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:29 PM
-11

You reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 11:08 PM
5

Before you know it, you'll find someone new who appreciates and respects you That's awful advice. OP needs to avoid this situation in the future. That means essentially MGTOW. It's the safest and most pragmatic option for men.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:45 PM
6

Relationships with women who you don't have a blood relation too are dangerous for men. That's the ultimate safety advice that can be given to men in your situation. Just like you should avoid poisonous snakes for which there is no antidote to their venom, you should avoid serious relationships with women who you can't count on to care about you unconditionally. And even then, be wary of your sisters, mothers, aunts. Because that's the thing. OP you have no recourse. I'd love to tell you there's…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:44 PM
7

Hell. fucking. no. Fuck the GMP. The GMP is a feminist funded and run propaganda machine made with the intent of carefully indoctrinating traditional and feminist values and ideas into men. Anything used to rear a male child from them will fuck a boy up far worse than whatever OP's aunt did to her son.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:34 PM
4

So, you are asserting that someone can deserve to endure physical abuse? Uh...yea people most certainly can. That said there's not much if anything anyone in a relationship can say to warrant physical abuse.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:30 PM
17

Getting people to take male rape seriously is half the battle. The other half is combating the feminist inspired notion that when you say male rape, you're talking about men raping someone else, not men getting raped.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:25 PM
5

Opinions without merit are by definition uninformed or unintelligent. sophist You sure are.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:08 AM
4

There are only three reasons any man chooses to support or involves himself with feminism, masochism, ignorance, chasing pussy.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:29 AM
8

Sometimes I'm so happy I have RES. Even though the mods are kinda lazy, or more likely people in this sub don't know what a "report button" is I can just tag trolls like you.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:07 AM
1

Most of the bullet points under psychological and economic abuse are part and parcel tactics in typical feminist arguments. The feminist definition of abuse defines their interaction with opposing or differing views as abuse. YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP!
/r/MensRights25/03/14 01:15 AM
1

The majority of people using the terms genderqueer or gender fluid are likely neither of those things but attaching themselves to those labels for victim points. Buck Angel is genderqueer, your average white middle class first world woman head still ringing with feminist jargon from their community college's gender studies course is likely not, no matter how hard they rail on about it on their tumblr or blog. Guys like Buck are rare, literally. The most minute of minorities. I find it hard to be…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 01:06 AM
13

Sue for custody, if she can't maintain living conditions for the child she has no business with custody.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:17 PM
2

There's nothing reactionary about not diminishing the importance of men's issues just because the victimization of women has to be deified.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:37 PM
0

Fuck off and die troll.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:08 PM
3

That goes without saying, but that hasn't stopped feminists from burning a strawman before.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:33 PM
0

But half of our movement is obsessed with women and feminism like they're one's who are the problem. Some women's attitudes maybe, but if you seriously believe feminism is anything but anti-men's rights you're either ignorant or delusional. Edit: For thousands and thousands of years men have been in charge and much of our identity has been tied to having control over women. Historical revisionist crap like this for example. Men have not been in charge of anything for any period of time, a man, a…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:24 PM
2

This is MensRights, not WomensWrongs. What the fuck does exposing feminist hypocrisy got to do with women? Feminism and women are two different things. If you're so far up your own ass you can't even reason that out what right do you have criticizing those who criticize feminism.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:22 PM
2

Innocently holding an opinion and advocating for the violation of other people's rights are two different things.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:18 PM
0

Die.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:17 PM
3

Male circumcision (partial or full removal of the foreskin) is comparable to any form of FGM, that's not up for debate. People will bring up the anti-intellectual drivel and state that "you cannot compare male circumcision and FGM..." and they are wrong, but they probably aren't worth arguing with in the first place. Any two things can be compared on their objective characteristics and have their similarities highlighted, FGM and MGM aren't excluded, denying that two objectively similar things c…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:15 PM
2

"Beliefs" don't trump basic human rights.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:14 PM
0

you whining about assholes Further hahahaha
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:01 AM
0

you think Hahahaha
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:27 AM
4

Then stop being an anti-humanitarian prick.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 10:08 PM
4

I support infanticide as the parents choice. Never too late for an abortion. If only your parents shared that sentiment.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 09:55 PM
1

This argument applied to gun laws I can understand. But I simply refuse to agree to the concept that anyone has the right to not be "offended". It may be a bit fallacious but there's a slippery slope in that ripe for abuse, as MRAs we should all be wary of it too with the way in which feminists tend to attempt to censor us.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:15 PM
2

The US provides individuals and corporations the right to treat others unfairly, harming another person is essentially completely legal which i just can't understand. There's a history of back of forth when it comes to big business. Believe it or not there was a time when american workers had business' constantly on their guard as they should be when unions were popular. "right to work" Oddly enough the right to work concept arose as a popular idea against unions. After american labor unions bec…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:13 PM
1

With the clumsy and flailing fashion in which feminists use the terms sexism and misogyny this essentially means that being in the same room as a feminist is a definite legal liability. Edit: I'd also like to take this opportunity to say fuck Europeans ass backwards ideas on freedom of expression and speech. It's hard to imagine these concepts as we know them originated there.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 08:35 AM
8

You could say MGM, rape, DV, lack of social support or healthcare. But all men's issues tend to drive back to one force. Male disposability. A man's life is worth half, if that, of a womans. The death of women is a tragedy, a horror to teach us all a lesson. The death of a man is just another day of the week. It's not a coincedence that every headline about a tragedy reads "# people killed, # women and children among them". This concept is deeply entrenched into our culture, most of them actuall…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:37 PM
2

You want proof the Clintons are slimy? Research Jim Guy Tucker and how his last governance in AR went.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:27 PM
22

Sarkeesian is a bitch. Berating one woman for being an asshole is not "misogyny". Despite what feminists and you apparently claim misogyny is not the act of offending a woman.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:24 PM
1

;_; legbeard tears
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:20 PM
1

Piss off you fucking ideologue.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:08 PM
1

False. Here's a feministing article about it. Notice how virtually all the comments are opposed to male circumcision. http://feministing.com/2007/07/18/male_circumcision_and_female_p/comment-page-1/#comments[1] Some shit feminist tabloid/blog or whatever the fuck that is makes some half baked arguments against MGM, meanwhile the UN a largely feminist organization in it's humanitarian concerns gives out pamphlets on how to perform circumcision while campaigning against FGM. There's a word for thi…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:22 PM
-5

Feminism needs to fucking die.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 04:32 PM
1

Let me run this through retard translate. www.retardtranslate.com Blah blah blah bullshit bullshit women shouldn't be responsible for their inaction anymore than their action because ooky dooky scary patriarky
/r/MensRights21/03/14 02:01 PM
1

Yea you're right sorry. Meant to say "Democrats say whatever woman/feminist positive bullshit gets them votes".
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:27 AM
8

I appreciate the concept. But we shouldn't satirize feminists. Satire implies a desire for change in the subject being satirized. I desire no change from feminism, except from a state of existing to not existing.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:19 AM
2

Obama claims whatever feminist approved bullshit that gets him votes, much like all successful democrats.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:14 AM
8

It's only a penis Pretty much sums it all up. It's not as though it's important, or the thing attached to the penis has any value.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:13 AM
22

it’s almost invisible A convenient description of "rape culture" for feminists.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 11:57 PM
1

It still doesn't make it right to act out violently because you think you are justified. Who said anything about justification? What aren't you getting? You don't defend yourself: punished. Defend yourself: punished. Go overboard: punished. It doesn't matter what you do the outcome will be the same, you may as well teach her a lesson about hitting men anyway. If you can convince the police that you acted in self defense you still may be able to get out of trouble. Except apparenty not even defen…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 11:53 PM
1

This graph has been floating around for months before anyone actually pointed it out.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:23 PM
2

Nail. Head. you hit it.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:26 PM
1

Radical (not mainstream) feminism. Your definition of mainstream is a goal post moving cop out. Pathetic. First of all, this guy hit 4 year old daughter for licking him and he cut her lip. He's hardly this innocent victim. I never called him innocent, I called him a victim. And he was, of a toxicly biased system that eats men alive and spits out broken human beings. Second, even if he were, you don't think that advocating killing people and burning down police stations makes you "some kind of wr…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:02 PM
1

I'm saying you may as well. Because that's what you'll be punished for anyway.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:56 PM
1

Actually, a lot of feminists dislike NOW. Not sure about VAWA. Alot of feminists are irrelevant. So what is "mainstream" the numerous feminists in positions of power and influence who at some point or another have hurt or defamed men in some fashion, or all your facebook #feminists who are generally ignorant of actual gender politics. For every boy who's taught something like this, a girl is taught that her job is to submit to her husband. Heck, multiple girls are taught this. And would you take…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:44 AM
1

There's no forcing to it. There are no mobs of people outside businesses screaming at women telling them to not take a certain job or to not ask for a raise or not take a risk. These "issues" are minor at best, if they can even be considered issues. For example that men aren't seen as competent enough to take care of their kids after a divorce, when we know they are. That notion is strongly culturally embedded, and that ends up meaning the powers that be(in this case judges) tend to favor women …
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:42 PM
2

For example are women always "choosing" low income jobs, but in reality they are "forced" into this by subtle peer pressure from society. Oh lord...
/r/MensRights19/03/14 09:28 PM
1

edtastic just wrote a reasonable comment that wasn't some partisan whinge. My god...
/r/MensRights19/03/14 09:27 PM
0

Satire that hyperbolic would make Jonathan Swift blush.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 09:18 PM
0

Uh. Mainsteam is not the same thing as radical , pretty much by definition. Their ideas are not the same. In fact, mainstream feminism is opposed to radical feminism. I guess NOW, VAWA, and the countless feminist academic groups and organizations aren't "mainstream". Of course feminism is opposed to the MRM. Have you seen the crazy shit some people write on here? The most radical common opinion of MRAs is for men to distrust women. Something many of those who espouse this can't be faulted for as…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:42 PM
2

That would be kind of detrimental to her cause. If we accept that women can act destructive when triggered Hmmm.... This seems familiar. Women being given special sanction because they naturally act crazy.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:55 PM
2

Hhahahahahahaha Thank you. You made my fucking day.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:52 PM
1

Religion is in decline but the new "Secularism" is not an absence of Religion. You're a couple centuries late on that realization bud.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:47 PM
9

you don't know what a myth is, hint it's something wrote by bards and poets and it contains both real life and fantasy That's an ancient myth. That's not whats meant by myth in the modern context and you know it. A myth is a lie, a work of fiction. Quit being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:42 PM
-4

Sarcasm and PMS is not a substitute for an argument, cunt. Why don't you mozy on back to femra"debates" where you can pretend you give a shit without hampering discussion here.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:50 AM
0

Islamic terrorists and christian abortion clinic bombers/WBC don't dictate popular religious rhetoric, just the opposite, they are unpopular. They have no influence, or power. Shouldn't we judge MAINSTREAM feminism by what MAINSTREAM feminists are doing? Likewise, judge MAINSTREAM MRMs by MAINSTREAM MRMs? You don't even know what MRM stands for and yet you believe you have any ground to stand on here. Fact is you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. "Mainstream" feminism is popular fem…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:48 AM
-1

What's your point? Are there not shitty, terrible, ridiculous things said by extremists MRAs? I never said there hasn't been, but what the most extreme or bitter MRA has said does not compare to the shit feminists have been caught saying, and it doesn't even begin to compare to the things feminists have done. You've seen some of the ridiculous comments here, right? Do you really think feminists should look at the ridiculous comments made by some MRAs and say, "See? MRAs think it's totally fine f…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:39 AM
-1

But don't you think it's possible for someone to have a problem with the unfair treatment towards men AND the unfair treatment towards women? And if they did and called theirself a feminist they are A) ignorant, or B) delusional. Feminism, of course, isn't an organization Not counting the scores and scores of feminist organizations with federal funding, charity, and strong financial influence that have become embedded into our culture over decades of time. Do you think a person who advocates for…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:43 AM
-5

Yea, dodge the important parts. Do they have alot of power/influence/money/fame? Very intellectually honest of you. No wonder you're so keen on making nice with feminists, you share their penchant for disingenuousness. I don't want to hear bullshit like this - if you are UNWILLING TO FUCKING HELP, YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PLACE TO COMPLAIN. You are no fucking better than SRS when you take a shitty attitude like that, and thank fucking god when I joined the MRM I didn't run into you, because I sure…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:38 AM
6

No there isn't, no more than there is for men. Historical revisionism is for feminists.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:32 AM
-4

Some feminists are the reason some male victims go unaccounted for. Yea, "some feminists" in positions of power and influence. but I know on a personal level a number of people who call themselves feminists who take very ProMRA stances. Do these people matter? Do they have alot of power/influence/money/fame? No? Then who fucking cares. A smart thing to do - next time a feminist comes in here asking why MRAs are so antifeminist, instead of chasing them away telling them to hate themselves - tell …
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:02 AM
-2

Feminists are the reason male victims go unaccounted for. http://www.genderratic.com/p/2551/male-privilege-defining-male-victims-out-of-existence/
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:50 AM
-2

There really is no objective reason for any man not to beat the dog shit out of any woman that attacks him. Even if all you do is put your arms up to defend yourself you'll apparently be punished. So if a woman ever does attack you, beat that cunt to within an inch of her life, see if she ever hits another man again. Edit: Also, who, what, when, where. I wonder if we can draw some attention to this, and get some proper justice.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 11:12 PM
7

which, by the way, is one feminist -- does the worst, most ridiculous comment here speak for all MRAs? It's not like there's some 100 year precedent for anti-male bias among feminists or anything. /s
/r/MensRights18/03/14 11:09 PM
-1

I see, you're just ignorant. Feminism is not egalitarian, they are supremacists, chauvinists. At best they ignore men and exclusively help only women, or they so zealously "help women" they hurt them(See: anti-sex feminists, separatist feminists, etc), or they "help women" via hurting men as much as possible. You can advocate for the rights of women without being a piece of shit feminist. But if any recognizable, benevolent, and honest women's advocacy can exist, feminism as it is must be utterl…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 11:02 PM
1

You're still here hypocrite? Fuck off, you and that piece of shit who thinks that "man up" shit is acceptable.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:09 PM
-2

You're defending it. I literally just posted a video on this sub yesterday about a doc saying how this is a problem. Then you're a hypocrite. Which is not surprising.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:18 PM
-1

There is nothing reasonable about "man up". You're supporting and agreeing with the most basic issue that men face. You are literally cancer for the Men's rights movement. It's a good thing RES has tags, so I can continue to give pieces of shit like you hell until you either get with the program, or get lost.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:14 PM
10

As is typical of feminists.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:13 PM
-4

Anti-feminism is part and parcel with supporting the rights of men. If you really believe otherwise you're delusional, or just totally ignorant.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:12 PM
0

If objecting to "man up" bullshit is what makes people "look down on the MRM" then I hope they despise us. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:10 PM
0

Extrapolating from your other comment. You believe my objection to being told to "man up" makes me "extreme". How about this. How about you get the fuck out of this subreddit, you fuck off far away from anything related to men's issues. You are holding us back. You are the cancer that stops the MRM from doing anything meaningful, you are worse than even the most rabbid man hating feminist, atleast they're honest in their desire to hinder the rights of men. Go fuck yourself you piece of shit.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:09 PM
0

Well you do seem to be informed by delusion, it wouldn't surprise me if you didn't know what a fact is.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:22 PM
0

Well, one of us is factually correct, the other is talking out his ass.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:18 PM
10

Why the fuck is this getting downvoted? This is great news. I get that alot of you other assholes who have been mutilated can't come to terms with your own inadequacies, but don't you dare rail against this and try to ruin this for the rest of us.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:13 PM
0

False comparison. The "red pillers" of feminism dictate the popular rhetoric and thought. TRP itself is highly isolated.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:11 PM
0

they think pointing out women can be bad will somehow make a point for us, and it's really not part of what we are talking about Pointing out that women are not benevolent angels of innocence who never do wrong is most certainly a point for us. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect Women are naturally and commonly attributed with benevolent qualities, qualities that link directly to issues and double standards men face, like sentencing disparity. Neoteny in wo…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:02 PM
3

/r/fightingfeminism Subbed.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:23 PM
-1

be the bigger man Fuck you.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:00 PM
2

Why? So this can be a front for liberal groups? For abortion, against, it doesn't matter, this is about feminist censorship and violence.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:52 PM
0

http://www.avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/07/tmhE80s.jpg You know if you had proof that's what any of these posters said you'd post it I'm sure. So very sure. http://i2.wp.com/www.avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/03/005-U-of-O-March-11-2014.jpg?resize=150%2C150 yea...you might wanna put up or shut up.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:37 PM
2

Hardly. Whether it's pro-lifers or the religious in Argentina. It's important that the reprehensible actions of feminism and feminists are highlighted, it's key to their inevitable destruction. Yes, inevitable. It's sure to happen without our helping it along, but there's no time like the present. You don't have to like or agree with pro-lifers or the religious, but you don't get to ignore how they too are attacked by feminists.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:24 PM
2

Hey, good news. Well alright.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:15 PM
2

He's not. Read the whole article, no mention of bitch or ass. Or whiny for that matter. Not even ctrl f shows any of those words anywhere.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:13 PM
3

The US? Communist? Seriously?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:43 PM
5

These things are also things we experience over the whole course of our life. If any person every experienced all that in a single day they'd be a broken human being by sun down.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:43 PM
0

Statistically speaking women abuse children at a higher rate than men do. So I hope your employer enjoys that.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:12 PM
6

Fuck off and die slow you pedo supporting fuck.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:09 PM
4

Why are you still here? I really despise the laisseze-faire moderation policy here, a piece of shit like you should not be allowed anywhere near other moral human beings, or as is the case here, children.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:05 PM
5

There is no other kind when it's a child an adult you sick fuck.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:04 PM
3

Greer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beautiful_Boy Haven't personally heard of the others, but I don't doubt they're pieces of shit myself, they are feminists afterall.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:02 PM
3

Helping men? What, like overloading universities with fake rape claims? Anonymous rape claims are an easy avenue of abuse by vindictive women against innocent men. There's also this little concept known as right to face your accuser. It's not just legal, it's moral, a principle, not just some meaningless bureaucratic step in the legal process. Colleges are already false rape factories, convicting and punishing men in kangaroo courts where the word of a "victim" is all it takes to ruin a person's…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:58 PM
1

I feel really weird agreeing with the unabomber.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:38 PM
14

Perhaps you should stop treating white men like shit then. AMR Eww
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:13 PM
14

as if women have structural power over men or something. The ability to destroy another person's life on a whim with a mere accusation that will be backed up with the full force of the legal system. What might you call that... This is problematic Problematic. Code word for "this bothers me, it shouldn't objectively, but my feelings on the matter mean more than rational thoughts." The idea that some groups have structural power over (and oppress) other groups is very much based in marxism. Perhap…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:02 PM
0

I love when shitheads do this. Point out horribly sexist and egregious actions by feminists lol it was just a joke, get over it.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 02:56 PM
-1

anti-feminist/anti-woman These two things are very different and distinct. You also cannot be pro-men's rights without being anti-feminism. It's like being pro civil rights but avoiding being anti-kkk. If you make demonstrable and meaningful efforts to help men, not lipservice, I mean actually help men and address problems they face, you will inevitably face feminist opposition.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 02:54 PM
0

Because that definition is incorrect. The only factually correct part of that definition is the "opposed...to feminism" bit. The rest is this seemingly brainwashing idea that feminism and women are inseparable things. I'm not a woman, but if someone told me my femininity was tied to some political hate group I'd be pretty pissed.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:02 PM
27

The second I read the word dictionary I just closed the tab. People like this are mentally defunct.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:01 PM
0

It's why 'no true scotsman' a fallacy typically found in religious arguments is so common among feminists.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:40 AM
1

Yea that does sound better, and more accurate.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:32 PM
1

There's a difference between caring about women's rights and being a feminine supremacist, aka feminist.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:53 PM
1

Obviously a difference in taste of music, but I've felt like this song applies. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMT1zd6Xt_U Absolute zero by Stone sour. If I offended you, you needed it.... I can bleed if I want to bleed I can feel if I feel the need This face is my last confession This life, it feels like a prison .... You're looking at an absolute zero I'm not the devil but I won't be your hero.... Man is a four-letter word, it's really absurd The hate isn't fake, it's just inferred... Another …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:39 PM
6

I'm not bothered by rape in fiction, and frankly I don't believe anyone short of a rape victim still emotionally suffering from their experience should. My issue is how it's percieved. Rape of men in fiction is a joke, or some token of female affection towards a man(as I understand it this is how this was meant to be taken?). Where as rape of a woman, even if she is the most vile, evil, shitty fucking type of person(the character) is seen as taboo, and "problematic"(there's an issue with use of …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:35 PM
1

Because of one wedge issue? Nothing of value to be discussed, learned, or talked about because they maintain one opinion or belief you've got a hard-on for?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:26 PM
1

For as long as I've had an interest in well having political opinions I've kinda avoided the abortion issue. Too polarizing and when I did look at the issue I couldn't help but feel it was one of those no right answer type of things. Typically pro-choicers assert that because an unborn child is unable to survive outside the womb(technically untrue, human cloning has never been done though it has been attempted, but a life can be gestated outside a womb)it should be up to the woman whether to ter…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:25 PM
0

What the fuck are you on about? Pretty sure that's a different thread. And yes rape can be funny, and yes first world women, primarily white women, are whiny. But that's how pampered people act.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:45 PM
44

biotechnology will allow criminals to spend thousands of years locked up in artificial hells. What the fuck happened to philosophy being something that's supposed to better humanity?? Seriously, that's fucking evil, like super evil.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:30 AM
3

We need to amend the young accounts rule to include throw away trolls people sit on for a while then use.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:29 AM
2

Because that's the idea.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:37 AM
1

Pro-men's rights and anti-feminism are the same thing. In practice anyway.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:34 AM
-8

That's exactly what he did. A real MRA, as opposed to a fake MRA. That's exactly what he said.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:31 AM
7

Because all human beings are deserving of empathy and respect. And other fantastical bullshit. Some people are just pieces of shit, Aerik is one of those people.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:31 AM
2

I live in one of the richest counties in the country, so the population is all rich white girls. Thinking that...women are whiny. >_>
/r/MensRights15/03/14 02:25 AM
-4

Well, rape can be funny. And if his only interaction with women is the microcosm of first world women...well...
/r/MensRights15/03/14 02:24 AM
-11

Maybe you should start a real men's rights club then. Because the first one abstract. Feminists are constantly abusing no true scotsman, don't start that shit with the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 02:23 AM
-1

It's not like he was mislead or lied to...oh wait. I'll explain this one last time just because I'm fairly certain you're legally retarded and these things just kinda fly over your head. The man is told by one of his other kids there's a stranger in his daughter's bedroom. He jumps to obvious and understandable conclusions and goes into her room ready to defend her, his home, and his self. He asks the daughter if she knows him, she lies says she doesn't, and now he has every reason to believe th…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:52 PM
-2

From the father's perspective he had every right to shoot him. He believed he was hostile He chose not to follow the father's commands when he had the gun drawn on him Self defense of your own home is a right, deal with it you intellectually dishonest cunt.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:07 PM
-1

Where is the rule that states you get to murder a "might be" or "attempted/ing" rapist? When you tell them not to move and they start reaching for something. It's called self defense, no matter how much people like you can't stand the idea that a person should be able to defend theirself and their home castle doctrine isn't going anywhere.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:00 PM
1

I get your point. If someone breaks into your home with the intent of harming you or your family you should just let them because waaa waaahh liberal tears about gguunz.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:58 PM
-1

Shout warnings A confrontation between the father and boy started. The boy apparently wasn't listening to the father's commands only shoot if your life is in immediate danger? reached for something. you can't justify murder because you thought he was reaching for something or because he was in your house. In that very exact situation yes you can. found stranger in daughters room daughter says she does not know him tell him not to move/stop/etc he reaches for something justified From his perspect…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:18 PM
-4

Jeezus. You are off in idealistic liberal la la land aren't you.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:58 PM
-1

he killed an unarmed, innocent boy The kid reached for something after he told him to stop, he was also operating under the belief(thanks to his daughter) that he was probably a rapist who had broken into his home. Had she not been lying and the kid did in fact break into the house trying to rape her he had every right to kill him.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:57 PM
0

Yes the father was a trigger happy idiot. Self defense is not being "trigger happy". unless this boy is making loud noise assaulting this girl, what is his excuse??? What the fuck does noise have to do with it? He found an intruder in his home, was led to believe he had raped(or was going to) his daughter and after he told him not to move he moved so he did what he had to in his mind(remember he was lied to) to protect himself, his daughter, and the rest of his family. Defending yourself and you…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:55 PM
3

Shooting who you believe to be a hostile intruder in your home is not over the line.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:53 PM
2

Holy fuck. Someone else who isn't completely brain damaged. Seems like people have been just desperately trying to find excuses in this case for what she did.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:52 PM
4

*Not in texas. NY or Cali? They probably would.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:52 PM
0

And? The crapshoot of whether or not it will actually affect him is irrelevant to the fact that she put that burden on him because she's a lying piece of shit.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:47 PM
-1

I'm not talking about just the legality. He has to live with the fact he killed an innocent kid because his daughter is a lying piece of shit. I doubt any charges will be filed against her either 10 years, minimum. She's a killer.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:19 PM
0

A point of view he wouldn't have had, had she not lied. This is all about her lie, no matter how you may want to spin it.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:27 PM
1

Except that he didn't, he was invited in by the daughter.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:02 PM
3

However, I don't think she actually wanted her BF dead. Wanted, didn't care, put her own shame above his life, what does it matter. She probably made her decision in a snap moment of sheer stupidity. Maybe she (again, stupidly) thought her Dad was bluffing or wouldn't have pulled the trigger. Stupid is not an excuse for selfish maliciousness.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:35 AM
2

If she told the truth, she'd have gotten shamed for having sex with him. The shame of a woman is worth the life of a man. I think I found a new slogan for men's issues. What I am saying is that IF our culture weren't so hysterical about teen sex, she would NOT have any reason to fear her parents punishing her for it and thus she probably wouldn't have lied and thus her BF would still be alive. You act like this just revolves around teenage promiscuity. This shit happens with adults too.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:32 AM
2

You don't think she may have incredible regret and misery over this? Ooh ooh no, she'll feel bad for murdering her bf by proxy and turning her father into a murderer...god that must suck for her.... I find it hard to describe her as "the winner". She lied, hurt other people because of it, and got away with it. That's an objective winner. I honestly fear what kind of fucked up situation humanity would be in if men could so easily get away with this low a level of accountability. I'm sad that we l…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:05 AM
2

Situations like this show why the gender system helps nobody. She lied, got someone killed, made someone else a murderer who will likely lose their freedom because of it, and she got away totally scot-free. Tell me what is so bad about that. I wish I had that little accountability, I'd do whatever the fuck I want when I want to who I want however I want.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:01 AM
6

Women lying about rape/sexual assault and men paying the price is not an MRA issue, fuck off you fucking concern troll.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:00 AM
2

Technically the father did nothing wrong. From his understanding of the situation, he was defending his self, his home, and his family. Had the daughter not lied, he likely wouldn't be a murderer, and the dead kid would not be dead.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:59 AM
-3

her father did something worse (trigger-happy shooting), now the dude is dead. Bull fucking shit he did. Objectively of course, but from his perspective some random fucking guy broke into his home and raped his daughter, what would you expect him to do under that pretense, ask him politely to leave??? What fucking warped fantasy land do you live in.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:57 AM
-1

When's the last time you heard of an act of violence committed against a woman for allegedly raping a man. That's what I thought.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:56 AM
1

Assume for a moment that the dead guy in the story was in fact raping her, she had no knowledge of who he was or why he was there. The father shoots him to protect his daughter, he has every right to protect his family and his home. Had what she said not been a lie, the father would have been in the right, but what she said was in fact a lie, and because of her lie she caused her father to take an innocent life, and now he will likely be punished for her crime. She should be punished full stop, …
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:55 AM
1

I have no objections. One person lost their life, and another will likely lose their freedom because she couldn't be bothered to take responsibility for her own actions. Fuck her life, fuck her freedom, she has no reasonable claim to either after what she did.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:52 AM
1

Based on this one story you are drawing a TON of conclusions. Historical precedent going back to the 30s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys Woman/girl is caught in embarrassing situation after consensual sex, lies to save face, the man/boy in the situation faces retribution for her lies. This isn't new, and it won't stop happening until we completely extinguish the notion that women need to be protected from men, that women don't lie about rape, that women are in fact not benevolently…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:51 AM
1

History repeats itself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys I wonder how many men and boys have to die and lose their freedom before people stop enabling women to lie about rape.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:48 AM
4

They both OD'd on heroin while there kids were not probably even 50 feet away in the McDs play area, if they didn't punish him earlier, why wait till they both fuck up to punish him worse. Either way it doesn't matter, this piece of shit still has her kids, no one who does shit like this should be near children, and regardless of his past misdeeds she doesn't get a free pass because of that.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:22 PM
-2

The fact that if blatant racists(KKK, neo nazis, etc) vote they tend to vote right wing, and if you're an american right wing politician, you're a republican more than likely if perhaps you have to be. There's also the predominant racism present in the larger constituency of most elected republican officials, aka the south. That said no republican is gonna run on a major national platform of "fuck those niggers", they'll leave that to their voters.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:52 PM
7

If you feel like your identity is shit, you are constantly compelled to earn your worth. The parallels with original sin are scary.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:29 AM
1

but this idea that women always get justice and men never do is just fucking stupid and false. Au contraire, thundercunt. We know women don't get justice. Women routinely receive lighter and less severe legal sentencing as well as social exclusion for similar violations and criminal acts. Yeah, I wonder why I would expect that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias I TOO WONDER. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias Hmmm....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_biashttp://e…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:11 AM
9

I hope, this is one of the issues that will help build the bridge the feminist movment really needs with the MRA movment I don't. I hope people get some sense and burn the bridge connecting to the feminst island of victim deification and petty sectarianism, cut them off and let them slowly die. The best thing that can happen for gender equality is for feminism to cease to be. It's far too late for feminists to pretend feminism is anything but a pro-woman only at best, feminine supremacy at worst…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:59 AM
2

The parties are the same then as today in name only. It's not slimy, it's historical fact. Today's GOP is not the same party by any measure as the one that existed a hundred+ years ago, vice versa democrats. That said, if you want to get your partisan hate boner up, by all means have at it, but don't expect those of us who don't want anything to do with your petty politically sectarian bullshit to just abide historical revisionism.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:41 AM
-1

What liberal means, I.E. open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values. Progressive as opposed to regressive or conservative. As in, the republicans were the party who had abolitionists, meanwhile the modern republican party is riddled with racists.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:38 AM
2

Implication is a matter of interpretation. You came here expecting "evil womyn hating emarayyyzz" and you found them. Shocking. Most people here would rather assure you of good intentions, and to discredit the misinformation you've obviously been fed, but I know better, people like you come here in bad faith. Your mind was made up about the MRM and this sub in particular before you clicked a link to get here. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:36 AM
-1

Your turn. And when you're done with that, perhaps you could explain why it was liberal Democrats who fought for slavery Hooold up there bud. The democrats of that era were not liberal by any stretch, most republicans weren't either, but that's more beside the point. In case you weren't aware over the years the democratic party and GOP kinda switched social political persuasion. Republicans were the more liberal minded party vice versa democrats then, while today democrats(in principle anyway) a…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:33 AM
3

Mmmmm, yeaaaaa... you feel that? That's that good ol' schadenfreude. Edit: The thing is, the fact that his wife treated him like shit isn’t an issue on gender, based on above posts . And even so, in this case, the men’s rights movement is pretty superfluous because he is fighting against a dichotomy (which is what feminism essentially is). If he feels he is a victim of society treating him like he is an unfeeling & disposable object, then instead of fighting for “men’s rights” (which sounds a lo…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:18 AM
2

Yea, that's a pretty blatant strawman. No where did I or anyone say what Brown did was ok. There is a stark difference between incited violence, and being sexually assaulted and tortured by some drug addled queen. If you're gonna play with the big kids, I suggest you drop the grade school logical fallacies.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:13 AM
1

Births are for women and women only, that crying thing that comes out of strong independent womyn is just an afterthought, like everything else.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:22 PM
0

If you were getting dick surgery it would be about your dick, there would be no new life form coming out of it who someone else also had a parental claim to. Birth is not about women, it's about the child being born.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:44 PM
5

furry and a feminist Dat masochism though.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:40 PM
2

Rihanna got her face fucked up because Brown lost his shit when she wouldn't stop hitting him while driving. Boy George handcuffed Audun Carlsen to a wall and beat him with a metal chain during a drug-fuelled naked photoshoot at his home. Pretty big difference between an incited attack, and a sex and drug fueled beating with a chain with no way to escape.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:34 PM
0

but I also don't think a mother should be forced to have the kid just because the dad wants to. If we're at the point where it's being decided whether the father should be present during the birth, no one made her carry the child to term, she chose to. I don't even know where that came from or what it's relevance is. So only one person is involved in actually making the kid Gestating and reproducing are two different things.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:27 PM
0

How does it feel knowing that girlfriends can be barred from watching your urologist tear into your sack during that vasectomy? That's a shitty comparison and you know it.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:25 PM
17

Catering to women seems to help women quite a fucking bit. The world's a great place when you have no accountability.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:21 PM
1

Can a grown child sue a parent for custody of a sibling? Either way things are bound to get legal if you plan on doing something. Document the abusive behavior of who ever this guy is who she brought home, and her own drinking if you can.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:40 AM
3

If you want a scary thought, I remind you that these people are heavily embedded into popular academia.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:33 AM
4

Right now feminists organizations could make a better claim of actually DOING something for men. You're joking right.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:21 AM
12

You can calm down and tone down the swearing please. I said fuck once, shit. I'll admit that was all a bit kneejerk, but I'm just sick of seeing feminists deflecting criticism of feminism via no true scotsman, and the blatant and unapologetic way they do this. The way I originally read your comment seemed to be one of those cases, just a misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:08 PM
23

here's a huge difference between people who are actually feminists Let me stop you right the fuck there. This is a logical fallacy, a common one ideologues use to disingenuously deflect criticism. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman feminists in the egalitarian sense This is an oxymoron. Feminism is by practical definition is not egalitarian, it is pro woman. That is the most common theme of feminism. Man hating coming in second behind that as a popular theme. and people who think …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:41 PM
24

Because radical feminists aren't true feminists. ^^^^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:20 PM
3

Premeditated murder(possibly serial spree), torture and abuse of animals, and pedophilia. Effectively no sentence what so ever. Probation is not a sentence, it's occasional baby sitting with an officer of the court. This bitch should be locked in a dank dark cage and be forgotten about.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:15 PM
-1

Here's to that evil bitch serving all 20.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:07 PM
8

An Uncle Tim.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:03 PM
2

That's called spin. AKA, "here are some nice placating words, stop presenting my obvious faux paw as the ugly shit that it is".
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:03 PM
3

I hope you just forgot the /s.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:59 PM
9

This post should be archived to show why the GMP is not an ally of the rights of men, and to demonstrate what happens when feminists address issues men face.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:55 PM
0

The objective fact is that the vast majority of Fox reporting is factually accurate You really are delusional. I would love to see evidence that the facts are any less accurate than the rest of the major news networks Bullshit from other sources does not negate the bullshit from FOX. I'm sure that you know quite well that AVfM is disliked by a significant amount of people in this subreddit. AVfM is disliked by thin skinned concern trolls and people who resort to tone argument to drown out people…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:44 PM
0

AKA concern trolling. If you really believe AVfM is comparable to FOX, you're delusional.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:08 PM
11

I can deal with the fact that doctors would perform a circumcision under the ignorant notion that they're helping the child, but this woman took some kind of sick pleasure in this. Fuck her, she deserves to be cut herself.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:16 AM
2

It's scary to think it's this easy for a woman to get away with serial infanticide.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:11 AM
0

This is how you lose arguments based out of slander and tone. Thanks for taking us all down with you because you care so much about the approval of the worst enemies of men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:09 AM
6

A violent and manipulative world power was betrayed by someone to another violent and manipulative world power via having it's dirty laundry aired to the world. I'm struggling to care. Trying....almost.....no, sorry.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:07 AM
1

People are funny...if you give them a limitation, they'll find a loophole and make an opportunity out of it. As it's been historically known, capitalism. Opportunity is everything.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:04 AM
0

Gender nepotism.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:03 AM
3

I know it's not the real manboobs, just a watered down copy.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter