TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

unbannableBob Archive

View 2 posts and 173 comments by unbannableBob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Count the number of massage parlours in your city. Plot the change over the last 2 decades. They aren't growing for no reason. The only reason you think it isn't popular is social shaming. And the only reason it's socially shamed is because it would be unfair to women if men could pay a small amount and have a hot babe do unspeakable sex acts upon him... But there are no equivalent female brothels where a woman could pay a small amount and have chad commit long-term to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 01:49 PM
5

Honestly I think it will just be normalising hookers. The default male gameplay loop will be to earn money, chill with the bros and when you get horny, go and pay an 18 year old Asian girl to perform for 30 minutes an disappear.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 09:05 AM
1

Well assume the next generation is moral, born to immoral parents. Given the assumption that reproducing itself is immoral (we can go into this separately)... The moral kids.. don't reproduce either. Infact the steady state of the universe itself would be pure immorality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 03:29 PM
1

I believe the original argument was, if you don't reproduce, you guarantee immorality in the world as the only people that reproduce will be the immoral ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 03:05 PM
1

Well how does one exist without a sexual process leading to birth?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 03:01 PM
1

I don't think we're arguing whether religions comes out of the urethra.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 02:54 PM
1

True but your socialised by forces that themselves are subject to natural selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:07 AM
1

Sexual transmission is a special case of a more general form of reproduction. Even thoughts and ideas can reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 12:14 AM
–

I think there's a lot of different problems that feminism has caused. And I want you to be sure here, I don't hate feminism.. I think it's unfair that women had a different lot in life to men. And it's a good thing that it's more equal now. HOWEVER... we cant ignore the insane societal.problems this has caused: Women biologically date up. Like their vagina literally dries up when thinking of a lower social status man. The problem with this is that if women are now equal to men in terms of pay...…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 01:24 PM
5

Sorry it's 45% not 60%
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 05:53 AM
10

In the past I'd have said mid 20s. By mid 20s you'd have run the higghschool->uni circuit and had crushes and been crushed on.. and eventually hopefully asked someone out and gone to prom with them or had a uni romance. HOWEVER.. in today's world that's not the case. Remember 60%+ of men have never EVER asked a girl out or approached a girl. I for one have a circle of friends in their 30s that gave literally no female experience whatsoever almost. I think due to feminism gone off the rails our s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 04:04 AM
1

I'm saying the female sex drive isn't a 'sex' drive per se. Calling it that draws false equivalence to the male sex drive which is actually a 'sex' drive. Suffice to say females don't have a 'sex' drive. And to call what they have a sex drive leads to a LOT of confusion in society because it falsely puts the idea in people's mind that it is at all related to the name sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:53 AM
10

Nowhere. Like that's it. Thats the end of humanity lol. There's nowhere left. Just play video games until you die.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:51 AM
1

I don't think many men are claiming this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:50 AM
1

No I mean human existence and growth itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:50 AM
20

Nowhere. It's over. Dating apps are shit. Work is shutting where you eat. School is good but it's a narrow time window and you have to use looks because no one is really rich at school. Anywhere else is rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 01:00 AM
1

But again. Women are supremely concerned with WHO they are having sex with. For instance, in every western city in the world you'll see an Asian massage parlour. Men will go to this massage parlour and pay an elderly Asian woman that doesnt even speak the same language as him for sexual favours. You will never find the female equivalent of this. No matter where you go in the world. You will never find women that will pay an old Asian man that doesn't even speak the same language to jerk her off.…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 12:54 AM
1

We're on the internet. It's not like a public place where you can scream that and a few simps will come beat me up lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:45 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rape https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/t/thornhill-rape.html?source=post_page-----4af9b6528127
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:41 PM
2

Well... If you believe that you are a moral person. And you believe that having you in the world makes it more moral... Then by you not existing, (due to choosing morality over existence)... You leave the world filled with immoral people (the people that chose immorality AND existence). Thus by not existing you've made the world less moral due to your refusal to commit a contained amount of immorality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:38 PM
1

The more kids you have, the more likely the genes that caused you to have more kids will propagate. Infact not just genes.. but memes as well. As in, if believing in a certain religion causes you to have more kids.. and you inflict your religion on your kids.. that is a reproductively successful thing, the religion itself acting similarly to say blonde hair or blue yes in terms of conveying a reproductive advantage. In any case. I think women do have sex drives. But I think it is different enoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:35 PM
1

Yes I'm sorry. I neglected the case of the virgin birth. Please forgive me. You don't see many religious people on Reddit, and I didn't realise you were one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:31 PM
1

Being forced to penetrate is like forcing a fish to swim. Rape isn't like domestic violence where secretly men are way more victims of it than women... Most men instinctually love sex with almost anyone. Like if you manifest a floating vagina Infront of a man alone in his room... Many of them will attempt to fuck it. The male sex drive is not the same as the females. I'm not saying men have a stronger sex drive.(It's entirely possible that a woman would want sex more given a very specific scenar…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:28 PM
2

Unfortunately existence out ranks morality by the very fact that if we don't keep trying to exist because it would be immoral.. we end up in an immoral world anyway as we're not there anymore.. and the people that are... Are the immoral ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:02 PM
1

Forgive my blasphemy. I didn't mean to deny the virgin birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:01 PM
1

Well let me turn up the controversy then... In a situation where most women for the past are having sex done to them.. Rather than actively going out and pursuing it. What reproductive advantage does having a sex drive actually have? If your a guy without a sex drive, it's over for you. No one is going to generally force you to have sex and have lots of kids.. But if your a woman. It almost doesnt matter if you have a sec drive. Your going it get fucjed and have a bunch of kids regardless. so wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:00 PM
1

Not true of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 09:56 PM
2

Yes this is how human reasoning works.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 09:55 PM
1

Honestly they basically don't exist outside of a statistically tiny set of exceptions featuring men in specific scenarios. Ie. Gay men being raped by women, transexual men/women, and other very specific cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:34 PM
2

I think you misunderstood what I said. For most of human history if a man wanted to have sex with a woman... It's going to take another man to stop him (father/brother.. etc) So in this case, who a woman 'wants' to have sex with is actually not very relevant at all in terms of who she DOES have sex with. Ultimately she'll have sex with the man who can convince the other men that he will have sex with her. Infact if you look at the wording of marriage and how that ceremony plays out it's obvious …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:29 PM
2

I think the neocortex allows us to reason, but the rest of the brain is what allows us to desire. Here were investigating desire itself. So the idea of morals values go out the window.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 06:48 AM
5

I'm saying it is entirely possible that women evolved to reproduce with men they don't necessarily find sexually attractive. And our attempts to normalise how both genders view this has resulted in some bizzare unnatural distortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 06:41 AM
4

I suspect it's because in the past for evolutionary history it makes no sense for a woman to want it have sex with a man that doesn't want to have sex with her. Firstly because most men will drop a load into any woman that was willing, but also because if he really didn't want to... He is bigger and stronger than you so it ain't happening either way. There is no reproductive advantage for a woman to want to have sex with someone that doesnt want to have sex with her. This isn't true for men. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 04:52 AM
10

I understand completely but women evolved for a life of being with a strong protective man that they don't necessarily sexually desire, but does have sex with them (despite their disinterest) regularly. Process that carefully. For most of human history the women that reproduced were the ones that just got with who could keep their kids alive. And the reproduction occured not necessarily because she threw herself at him willingly .. but more he forced himself on her and her best play was to go al…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 04:27 AM
1

I think they just need to legalise and normalise seeker hookers. Like that should be the default way of getting sex It's a true meritocracy to some extent as no matter how ugly, or indian you are, you can always just transmute money into sex at roughly the same rate as everyone else. The idea that guys should just forgo sex is like forgoing eating. It's a biological urge, like salmon swimming up stream. It's cruel and unusual to suggest that should just go without.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 11:06 PM
5

What I don't understand is if prostititiion gets legalised. Why do men even need women anymore. They aren't cooking. They aren't cleaning. Apparently their earningless than your bro. And if you marry then they don't even need to have sex with you. They have to want to have sex... Which is completely up to them, and not you. Which is also the case with any random other woman anyway. So what's the point of getting with women. Just shack up with a bunch of bros, earn money and order hookers and piz…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 10:41 PM
2

What rights
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 06:45 AM
2

There is no concreteness to it. It's a very wishy washy.. Does marriage guarantee financial stability? Not necessarily. There's no rule stating your husband must feed you or visa versa. What about housing? Not really. What about love itself? That's very.. abstract. People love in different ways so this is a meaningless statement. Sex? Obviously not. Marriage doesn't guarantee sex, or even make it more likely. Infact evidence seems to point to the opposite. The only real meaning marriage seems to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 06:08 AM
1

Ah, I suppose I mean dead bedroom. Of course if you don't want to have sex once or twice it's fine. But you need to be honest and aware that your partner decided when that fine level is. The idea being you don't get married to a monster that wants to root 24-7 at the expense of all else. But once you sre married either you divorce or you deal with the person your with in terms of their desired sexual frequency.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 05:55 AM
-1

It's not when you dig a bit deeper.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 03:58 AM
-2

Well the honest thing to face up to... (Given that 99.99% of blue pill advice on dead bedrooms is just to divorce)... Is t-mhe marriage not already ruined when a dead bedroom happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 11:06 PM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31509092/ Mlady
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:54 PM
0

https://drchelseapage.com/blog/risforresponsivedesire
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:45 PM
0

That's great, care to explain why? Or are we just going to tell the equivalent of "WRONG! YOU FUKING IUDIOT"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:22 PM
-1

It's too late. All the manosphere prophecies came true in my life lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:20 PM
0

Honestly that would be a more meaningful agreement than marriage atm
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:18 PM
-4

It doesn't work without that. Theres no point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:16 PM
1

Why do they call it cheating. Who is being cheated. And what is the advantage that's being conveyed unfairly to the chester?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:14 PM
1

No because after we start having sex, she suddenly realised she enjoys it. But it requires borderline rape to get there because she's never in the mood to start.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:13 PM
-1

Because women have responsive desire. They want sex after its happening. Not being in the mood is putting the cart before the horse. They don't mention sex in the vows because it's a given. That's like not mentioning it's a race at the grand prix and mentioning all the rules about engine type etc... of course it's a race.. Of course it's a long term sexual contract. That's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:11 PM
0

I think another problem is biologically women have responsive desire, which means they don't want sex until they are half way into it. This does not play well with the idea of consent as if you ask the answer is always 'no'. We got around this in the past because the unspoken rule of marriage was it's the wife's womanly duties to always provide sex... And with that mindset, more sex that both people enjoyed happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:09 PM
1

I don't even think it would. I'd rather a woman that has sex with other people and has sex with me... Than has sex with no one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:07 PM
-7

that's what marriage has traditionally been. Thats why men get married, the unspoken promise of sex on tap.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:06 PM
2

Trust is a good feeling man. Like when ya fall back and your not sure they are going to catch you but they do. It feels alright. But it hinges on you not being sure they are going to catch you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 06:44 AM
14

I mean if you trust your partner it's fine not to get one lol. But if your at the point where your getting one, your already suspecting infidelity, which means you absolutely shouldn't tell her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 06:09 AM
9

No. You should not. Your doing a paternity test because you suspect foul play. Why would you tell them your investigating so they can make up an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 05:44 AM
–

Hahaha oh you sweet summer child
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 03:10 AM
6

I like him because he is marketed to normies as a soft introduction to redpill content. He doesn't come off like a lonley guy looking to to date, but just a good looking entertaining presenter. But then he sort of subtlety slips in red and black pills and leads them down a rabbit hole which ends with Rolland Tommassi declaring women are satanic demon spawn
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:26 AM
1

Well no one is hurt in my situation as well
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:09 AM
1

Well if she asks I'll tell her, luckily she is so disinterested In sex, and so afraid j suppose that anything related to that topic would lead to sex... That she never brings it up. Thus I wont
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 11:11 PM
1

No. People that aren't In a sexual relationship with me, it's not their business who I'm having sex with. Love is about honesty, for sure. But it's not about sex. We've done the part where we communicated our needs.. hers are being met, because I love her. She can't meet mine due to what I must assume is physical / psychological incapability. Therefore I selflessly stay with her meeting her needs while taking extra effort and steps to get mine met.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 11:01 PM
1

I will quote my wife in response: Love isn't about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 10:24 PM
1

Well of course you'd say that. You don't love her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:24 PM
1

Well of course you'd say that. You don't love her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:24 PM
1

No, men cheat to stay in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 06:04 AM
0

Well we've tried. We've talked. We've went to therapy. Didn't work. The options are to divorce or cheat. I love her and don't want to leave. So I chose cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:28 AM
0

If I only put my sexual needs before anything else wht wouldn't I just leave her and find someone that can give me regular sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 12:23 AM
1

I think that's a common scenario in south east Asia where the Thai sex worker will have a Thai husband who knows what she does and she provides for him with her earnings. I dont think its considered cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 11:33 PM
1

I love her. That's why I cheat rather than simply leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 11:29 PM
1

No that's disgusting... People in ccmas shit themselves n stuff. Drugging and raping is a risky thing with a lot of problems. Time freeze or bust.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 02:41 PM
-7

Hey you could have been time frozen raped a thousand times by now... And you'd never know. So how can you claim to be hurt by it, let alone even have feelings about it. It's like if a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it.. did it even fall. If a Japanese guy time freeze rapes a woman... And he enjoys it and keeps the memories forever... But after yes done he cleans up and she doesn't have any memories of it or anything... Did he even rape her? Ya get what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 09:56 AM
1

Ayyyy free vesectomy letsss goooo bebe
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 05:12 AM
–

Found the hormonally challenged Redditor!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 05:05 AM
1

Close to 100, minus the hormonally challenged and autistic. Just have a look at how many Japanese porn scenarios feature the 'time stop' gun and a random subway train or office. If you define rape not as fighting a struggling person to put your dick in but instead a 0 consequences... If they just freeze and you can do whatever perverted thing you want to them... And they have no say or even no memory Its close to 100%
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 02:06 AM
4

The only benefit to highschool dating is not everyone has had their growth spurts yet so short guys don't get shit on so badly because they might still grow taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 11:05 PM
10

This is true. In highschool female hypergamy plays out irrelevant to money, personality etc. Its basically irl tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 11:04 PM
2

Yes. Its a general you. The problem with breaking up is now we have a life together and kids and a house. (General 'we'). So leaving is far far costlier. And it's likely to end in a divorce anyway if I get caught so why wouldn't I take the shot anyway if I'm convinced it cant be fixed with words.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 10:56 PM
-2

Nope cheating is fine if the sex stops. You can't demand to be the sole provider of something you don't provide. You weren't honest when you got married about how you were going to be sexually so why should he have to be honest about how he's going to be sexually. When you decide not to have sex with your partner, he views you now as someone he doesn't have a sexual relationship with and thus like other people he doesn't have a sexual relationship with he doesn't need to share any information wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 10:42 PM
2

Men are biologically predisposed to over estimating female interest. Over estimating it gets you laid, underestimating it means you go extinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:49 AM
1

First of all, I don't think what your saying makes sense. Infact I don't think you think it makes sense either. Put aside the word racism. It won't help in any capacity in the world. And don't ever try to appeal to mods or anything on this sub. This is the one place on Reddit some purple haired slob mod isnt going to shut down rational discussion to avoid hurting feelings. Here we can get to the heart of the issue rationally. Why are you bringing up interracial marriage? I'm really not sure I un…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 11:38 PM
3

Ehh your tricks don't workkk on here, onllyy smvvv
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 06:35 AM
1

Its a dating market. The girl there is an object (yeah come at me brah, U know want to Ginnie dat sweet sweettt did y just call women objects ermaggawd?).. anyway the girl is an object with a price tag in smv.. You don't have enough smv. You try to haggle, the store owner (her soul perhaps that's trying to sell her body), the store owner tells you sorry he can't do a discount you don't have enough smv . You bargain a bit, tell him about your starving dick at home and how hell really be helping y…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 04:28 AM
42

The only honest rejection is: I'm sorry your SMV is too low, I think I can get better than you. Please increase your height, ethnicity, or facial features, finances and try again at a later time, thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 01:47 AM
1

Adhominem is a solem admission of defeat. Thank you for having that humility. You tried your best.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 01:30 AM
–

Mostly an age issue. Also bill gates isn't really fit. But say in his 20-30s, if he hit the gym, dressed well and had game I think he could qualify for most women. The issue I'm point out is disqualification, if your not disqualified, then you can use your personality to make up for looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 02:47 PM
–

I see what your saying but men can be attractive via their personality as well. I don't think it's just to do with physical attraction. I don't buy the black pill idea that it's only based on looks. I think looks very much work as qualifiers. But if your over 6ft, northern European white, and fit... Then you can almost get any woman you want. The looks work like filters rather than a rating system. The actual rating system is a lot more in line with what women say it is. He needs to be confident…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 05:49 AM
–

Well... I think you may be right but the reasons why you are right are patriachy, literally. Looks don't matter in patriachical society as when a father or brother selects a husband for a daughter he is generally not looking for tall chads, but instead financially stable betas. For this reason under patriachy, where women don't get their own sexual choice, almost every man gets a mate and the most powerful trait he can have is industriousness (Financial benefit) and agreeability (beta). This is …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 11:18 PM
9

This is the right answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 11:06 PM
1

This isn't true. Its masking a more interesting problem. White women date white men predominantly and are biggotted to all else. Asian women date white men and Asian men (sometimes) and are biggotted to all others. Indian women date Asian white and indian men. And black women date almost any other race. Note that the dating prefences seem to reveal an ethnic hierachy where each race is willing to date their own race and 'above'. I think this pattern in dating tells of a pretty disturbing but tab…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 11:01 PM
-2

Is controlling women's freedom not an adaption?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 10:40 PM
1

I'm just saying a what if scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 10:38 PM
-1

No I mean if it turns out that for hu.anity to work and propagate, patriachy must be maintained. As in we evolved for a state of patriachy...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 03:30 PM
-1

In some deep corner of the world there is a pig that is born with teeth that don't stop growing. At some point the teeth grow so long that they grow through the roof of its mouth, curve, and penetrate its own skull killing it. Now, this isn't some genetic freak pig. This is a successful species. Nature seems to have designed it to suffer and die as a natural course of action. How do you know that your are not this pig? Or what I mean to say is... What if it turns out that female freedom literall…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 03:00 PM
1

That makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 08:24 AM
1

It absolutely is. A citadel of female empowerment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 08:23 AM
0

There's also the problem of the hot guy being attracted to another woman who is flaunting her assets. In this case she needs to shame the man for objectifying the other woman as this will make her feel less bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 07:20 AM
-3

From an evolutionary perspective could this be a way of shaming other women with more physical sexual prowess as a way for a lesser attractive woman to compete for male attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 07:16 AM
1

I live in a country where it's perfectly regulated with fancy buildings, security, red buttons, checks etc. There are thousands upon thousands of women in this industry where I live. They make a lot of money and choose who they see.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 11:02 PM
1

What in the world are you talking about Plenty of women would prefer making 300k a year giving blowjobs in bed vs making 25k a year flipping burgers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 03:17 PM
1

Her not being able to say no isn't the scenario I'm talking about, just like he being killed by a hockey mask wearing guy isn't. I'm talking legal sex work in a reputable establishment without trafficked women. If a guy were to regularly visit that, hoping for good sex that's the equivalent. Sex is infact payment that a woman gives chad in hope for a chance at commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 07:24 AM
1

Nor can regulated sex work. Lady can always say no, and chad can always swipe left. Even if you pay her she could just dead fish. And even if you fuck chad he could just ghost you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 07:14 AM
1

True but that's hard to quantify. You can't tell someone they won't enjoy sex with a future partner they haven't met. But women clearly themselves know that they don't want to give away their sex to just anyone...they have some idea that the more sex they give this guy, the less value the sex will have to other people .
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:26 AM
1

Originally marriage was just an agreement that the man can get sex on tap in exchange for looking after her and the kids. I mean that's generally what men want. They want sex with lots of different women but will settle for reliable sex with one..
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 04:32 AM
1

When I say I don't have money, I mean I need a partner to join finances with so we can afford the house/car/holiday life. I'm not poor. If I was dating again and I was a millionaire. I would be 0 value on her career/prospects. It doesn't matter to me. I'd take the cute highschool dropout starbucks worker over the not as good looking business analyst with a 6 figure salary. I'm an average guy. 5'7. So a bit on the short side. I'm kind. Im supportive. I'd say I'm pretty smart. I'm ambitious, I wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 11:31 PM
3

We had that before tinder.. It sucked. No one used it. The problem with dating apps is a game theory problem. Humans aren't designed for infinite access to other people. The male-female interaction is based around women transparently seeing what kind of other women men are with, and men having to take personal risk in approaching a woman. If you remove both of these, were not evolutionarily wired to function sexually. Men swipe right on ever girl cos there's no fear or cost of approaching. And w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 11:16 PM
-2

Alright let me give you the truth. When it comes to dating, I'm looking for: 1 cute 2 young 20-30 ideally. 3 able to help financially because I'm not rich. (Note if you want to get a man that himself is rich. This becomes less important. Ie. If I was fucking rich I'd get with a hot starbucks worker, I'm not so I need to get with a successful professional woman) 4 Regular long term sex. The number 1 thing a woman can do in the relationship to cause problems is let her man's balls fill up. This le…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 11:09 PM
1

Not the same but there is an equivalence to bribing chad to commit by having sex with him. And you might say, but she WANTS to have sex! To that I ask .. why with Chad though? You want to see what 'wants to have sex' looks like, go see the millions of men in massage parlours paying old Asian ladies that don't even speak the same language to jerk them off... That is 'wants' to have sex. She doesn't want to have sex. She wants chad. She is HAPPY to use sex to get chad, in the same way your happy t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 10:53 PM
1

Well the hooker pretends she wants to have sex with him for a price. Chad pretends he wants to commit to her for a price.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 10:46 PM
3

I'm 35. I think my views on this kind of arced over time. I started off thinking fucking virgins was cool, and if your gf had sex with someone else then that was disgusting... Then I grew up and wanted a woman with a lot of experience because j hated having to reach them stuff etc. Then I got even older, had several relationships and wisened up and realised that there are a lot of things you won't ever have with a girl that's had plenty of other guys. Every time a movie scene or something comes …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 03:49 PM
1

Well if you can't address the argument I'm not sure we can proceed..but humor me. Where is the circularity of the argument im not seeing it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 09:38 AM
0

No honestly women shouldn't date me at all. The reasons why are explained clearly in the post I'm just saying that women that swipe tinder hoping to bag chad... Are the same as men who frequent hookers hoping to have great sex. Both are trading a scarce resource for a chance at what they want. No judgement at all. I think women... SHOULD swipe on tinder only dating chad. I'd be hypocritical if I was against that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 09:34 AM
1

Yes their chastity and value as a potential lifelong mate. That is what is removed from a woman. It is removed from her as her body is possible pregnant now which means any future mate that tries to get with her may end up raising another man's kid which is the ultimate evolutionary loss. It also means she might have baggage and think about old good times with her old partner which is not ideal. Now most men are fine with women that are not ideal. No one is perfect. But the more optionality a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 09:32 AM
1

I assumed that was just a childish adhominem attack that poured out uncontrollably along with your main argument and politely ignored it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 06:14 AM
1

You believe that control is the reason female chastity is more valued than male chastity? Look I'm just going to say it. Men aren't women. They are major biological differences that then cause major differences in psychology. I feel like deep down you have trouble accepting that fact. You WANT to live in a n mmorpg where the male and female selector isba purely cosmetic thing. But in reality it's not that. Its a major differences that impacts everything from strength, personality, desires, intel…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 05:48 AM
0

Well auto erotic asphyxiation is because in a low oxygen state your body biologically responds to arousal better. Just like in a high chastity state the chance for a healthy disease free brith for what your sure are YOUR offspring is much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 05:07 AM
1

If it were just that, then how do you explain the insane value multiple cultured around the world throughout history have put on female virginity and chastity completely INDEPENDENT of each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 03:32 AM
0

Well yeah we've got the observations in reality. For instance there are women that are selling their virginity for X while, it's almost unheard of for men. This indicates humans value female chastity more than male in a pretty objective sense. So there's an objective observation.. And so we need a theory for why. Well, reproduction is far more impactful of the female body than the male, and as a male, if your girl has been with others you can't know if the kid is yours in primitive times... So t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:34 AM
0

Women ultimately want to have an exclusive relationship with Chad. Chad defined as a good looking, financially stable, socially prominent man. They know many many women throw themselves at this man. They also know that due to his high desirability he has options and isn't JUST looking for good looking women. One of the things, that a man of that calibre is after is exclusivity and a lack of baggage. No man wants another guys sloppy seconds. I know it sounds bad. But because reproduction takes su…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:21 AM
4

I think for a lot of women they understand they are giving away a piece of themselves that they'll never get back. If this wasn't the case there would be a lot more sex in the world. The women who feel like they aren't giving something away feel like that because they've already given most of it away. What's the difference to a prospective partner between I sucked 100 dicks and 101. But there is a huge difference between 0 and 1... And presumably a linear interpolation between those two points.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:47 PM
-4

Prostitutes don't generally refuse ethnicities and if they do, they do based on behaviour instead out some self preference. All women like money. Its just not worth getting beaten up and robbed over. That's why certain ethnicities are excluded. The equivalent is that some men will stay away from women who are married or with other guys. Just to avoid the scenario where her man busts in with a weapon mid coitus.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:44 PM
2

Its honestly not so bad. We've got video games and porn. Going extinct quietly Is generally much more pleasurable than actually succeeding in the past. Its like imagine if Hitler rounded up all the Jews and put them into pleasure chambers where they reached such earthly happiness and pleasure of all sorts until they died. They still died.. but it's a lot better than say the holocaust.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 03:04 AM
3

When discussing these things your right. Person to person variance is insane and your chad kid could be born with 6 legs and no dick.. But I think we need to average out over large swathes of the population to get anywhere.. On average ugly parents have ugly kids, average parents have averafe kids and good looking people have good looking kids. We have to operate on those facts else we are going to get caught in a million special cases and no be able to make sense of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 02:07 AM
2

No ofcourse not because Chad can fuck both and she can carry chads genes which if it's a son will give her son a genetic superhighway to reproductive success in the next generation. But if she gets with a bottom 50%er then her kids if male are just going to go extinct anyway to a future woman who decides to join chads harem instead of dating a bottom 50%er. Like from a natural selection perspective she has 2 choices. Fuck chad and get a shot at a chad son which allows her genes to spread like wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 01:59 AM
8

The reason many men are single is because the previous generations depended on patriarchy to reproduce. As in the reason most mens father's were able to reproduce is because they vastly economically superseded their wives which in many cases didn't work at all. Infact this socio-economic environment is the environment in which most current males genes were successful under. But just like an orangutan that goes extinct when it's forest gets cut down. Most men go extinct when patriachy goes away a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 01:53 AM
2

Ofcourse it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 01:48 AM
4

Well women want to be equal to men but will only date a man that earns more than them, so really they want to just genocide the bottom half of the male gender lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 11:02 PM
-5

Obviously the heart of this post is that deep down in male psychology and human biology the male trades things for sex. He trades, time, protection, and straight up resources and money in order to get sex from the woman or in more backwards cultures where she can't say no to sex anyway, he trades these things to the males around her so they won't kill him for fucking their daughter/sister. Later this evolved into the concept of marriage. In the western world, women stopped having sex with beta m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 10:50 PM
1

If we talk in absolutes. Your right. Many men simply don't want to have sex with a prostitute and would find it repulsive. And many women are fine getting drunk and fooling around with a friend for fun. But the horrible asymmetry with the lack of those kinds of massage parlours for women does say something about the general trends of things. There is something very different between male and female sex drives and I think the core of the difference is demonstrated with that assymetry in the exist…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 10:56 AM
0

I'm not sure. I could be wrong. Or perhaps there is some deeper connection your attempting to get from your boyfriend that you are some level believe sex will give you. I don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 10:50 AM
1

There are plenty that hire young women. There are plenty that hire old women. Both are popular among men. I use old Asian man to highlight that women are far far more concerned with WHO they are fucking than the act of fucking. Men a lot of the times don't care near as much. They are interested in the ACT of sex. Rather than who with and by extension what they can get out of it. Now attractive women are better than non attractive women for sure. But men will pay for EITHER. women generally don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 10:34 AM
1

Alright imagine a service. Old Asian men. All have vasectomies so pregnancy risk is 0. They are expert at making women cum. As a woman you can pay $70, and one of them will make you cum. In a no strings attached way. If what you were saying is true this would be a revolutionary new business that would take the world by storm. But I think there's a reason this hasn't caught on. Because it'd be out of business in a week due to no uptake. Why? The gender swapped version of this literally spread lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 10:31 AM
2

Generalise it a bit. Were not talking purely financial. It could be a social benefit. It could be an emotional benefit. It could be to bond with the man. You might say, obviously. Obviously women have sex with men to get closee emotionally. You might say men have sex with women for the same reason! You'd be right on all counts. Except one. Men have sex with women quite often for no reason other than to have sex. Women simply do not do this. The man who your having sex with is a big factor, along…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 10:22 AM
0

I think there's something missing. You have to consider the environment in which the female sex drive evolved. For most of mammalian history a female doesn't really have a choice in who is having sex with her. Normally the strongest buck simply gets to fuck every doe. Later on in human societies her father or brother married her off to a husband for whatever reason. But her choice was rarely taken into account. The idea that she would swipe right on 1% of men was laughable. She only had the righ…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 10:15 AM
1

Honestly most men would..I'm not saying hurt in any way. Or a bleeding cut off lower half. Im talking stuck in the dryer scenario lol. And yes most men would.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 09:26 AM
1

But how to even know what those results might be? We have been coercing women out of their natural sexuality for centuries. Fortunately, we've had something like this play out. Imagine an environment where women are basically free to select their mates without judgement. A private place with 0 effort or risk of violent retaliation to rejection. Surely in this free environment.. women's true sexuality will play out and we will see that they uniquely desire a variety of sex with the men most avail…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 09:19 AM
1

Oh you sweet summer child.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 09:06 AM
1

Precisely. Its disgusting. Arousal suppresses disgust. But yours isn't suppressed..because your not aroused. Because women aren't aroused sexually by the act of sex. But If I were to say there is no floating dick. Instead there's a handsome man that all your friends talk about, and he's interested in you, and he is so kind and generous to everyone and he's good with kids. Suddenly, sex with him is.. well you wouldn't crawl over broken glass to get it... But if the mood calls for it and your on a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 09:01 AM
1

Well, the people who go there say they got there because it's a cheap way to get off, and still have some female interaction. When I say exchange I don't mean financially only per se. But if I were to manifest a floating cock Infront of you. I daresay most women wouldn't try to fuck it. But men I would argue would definitely try to fuck it. There's something very different going on in the heads of men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:54 AM
1

I still haven't heard a satisfactory answer to the only actual real world observation: WHERE are the old ugly Asian men massage shops where for $70 an Asian guy that doesn't speak the same language is going to masterbate her for 30 minutes? Why does this literally exist in EVERY WESTERN CITY AROUND THE WORLD AND EXACTLY 0 VISA VERSA. This is such a clean observational result that youd need a heck of a good explanation... The best one is. There's no demand. Women simply don't value sex for sexes …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:42 AM
0

The old Asian man is going to rape and murderer her? That would be like killing the golden egg laying goose at that point. I mean here is a woman that is going toPAY you $100 to give you a handjob... And your going to kill her? This would never happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:39 AM
1

I think there are biological underpinnings as to why each gender views casual sex differently. But that's not what I'm discussing. Just the net result of those biological influences. And in terms of your belief of power imbalances. Every single guy in the world would agree to switch that power balance. I would in a second. What your saying I can just randomly proposition women for sex and have a > 30-40% success rate.. god damn you can take my right to vote for that. No problem. But I think we b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:34 AM
0

What do you think the 'consequence' of a woman going to an old Asian man and offering $100 to jerk him off would be? Put aside social aftermath for a second because men would face the same thing as well. But in terms of immediate result lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:22 AM
1

In general yes. But to really illustrate the point, I want to zero in on the case of men going to UGLY OLD THAI WOMEN, WHO DONT SPEAK THE SAME LANGUAGE... To get their needs met. Because this clearly illustrates the differences in male and female sex drive. Its something that would never even OCCUR to a woman to do. It wouldn't make sense. She'd be like "wtf why am I paying HIM". And there's give big give away about how women's sex drives actually work. Its not a sex drive as in a desire for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:10 AM
0

Female behaviour does not show the truth of your words.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:03 AM
0

Sure let's have sex then, name the time and place. Almost immediately when confronted with this question, the differences between how the two sex drives function shows up. I mean there are even those videos of a hot girl walking around campus offering sex and having a huge number of guys straight up agree. But when the genders were swapped. A tall handsome guy walking around offering sex. 0% of women took him up on it. 0%. There wasn't even an anomaly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:02 AM
2

That position assumes that had genders been more equal, women would be completely comfortable getting their sexual needs met cheaply by paying old Asian men to masterbate them at massage parlours. Now you and I both know that probably isn't an accurate statement. That in no world, no matter the power dynamic or equality will a woman PAY to have an ugly old man that does r speak the same language pleasure her sexually. But men are willing to do this. Pretty often. So I ask, do you seriously belie…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 07:53 AM
2

I'm pretty clear I think. How do you explain the ubiquitous existence of one and the complete absence of the female equivalent across all cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 07:50 AM
2

Fair. But how do you explain that there are no female targeted brothels where an old Asian man that doesn't speak the language masterbates her on the cheap? Surely this huge difference reveals something about female sexuality beyond just 'watered down' male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 05:55 AM
0

I'm dead serious about this. I think this model of female sexuality explains the observations far far better than the commonly accepted model.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 05:51 AM
-8

Well one of us is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 11:25 PM
-2

Alright I presented my hypothesis and a piece of evidence. There are no female massage parlours where old Thai guys give happy endings to women. You disagree. What is your alternative hypothesis and evidence. The core of what we're discussing is that in saying women have a different form of sex drive. Your saying it's the same as males, maybe a bit watered down.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 11:19 PM
-12

Don't confuse the male and female sex drives. Men are capable of feeling desire for sex with no goal or aim. This is why men will pay an 45 year old $60 Thai hooker that doesn't even speak the same language to jerk them off in massage parlours around the world. There is a reason that in no corner of the world is there a service for an old Thai guy to get paid to masterbate women. This is because women dont HAVE a sex drive as you understand it. They have a sex trading drive. They feel the desire…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 10:35 PM
-13

No no, she's right. Women view sex in the same way you view paying for something with a credit card. Its a cost and if it's something you don't actually really like it sucks. Just going through the motions paying bills etc. But if a new iPhone is out or you are booking a holiday you enthusiastically swipe your card. You are excited to pay and get your new phone! This is how women view sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 09:51 PM
–

Das okay Bro the violent guy that's beating her and you will be the one who's penis needs to fill up. You just there to demonstrate his fitness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 10:27 AM
–

But bro how will she sex if u dun get your head beat in and her be aroused at the scene and get with the aggressor. But no really this is a poorly thought out question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 09:17 AM
2

How can you say completely unpredictable? I think the dating apps and the very existence of the incel community being predominantly short balding ethnic men shows they are highly predictable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 09:39 PM
2

This is because there is an underlying assumption that as a man your wife will listen to you and you can 'tame' her with physical aggression. Its never said but this is the underlying assumption of people 2-4 generations ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 09:36 PM
1

Alright time for the scary possibility. In nature there is a certain pig. This pig grows long curved tusks that penetrate through the roof of its own mouth, painfully. They grow throughout its life until they painfully penetrate its own skull leading to death. This is a successful species of pig. For generations it has done this snd reproduced successfully. It is biologically successful and more pigs with this trait are being born each day to suffer and die, but also successfully produce yet mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 09:28 PM
–

Actually while this has been the case, women for the most part didn't get a choice... And naturally they are happy with this state of affairs. Billions of women in the past got assigned an average guy that they would have left swiped in 0.1 seconds in 2024. Which they then married had 12 kids with and lived long and fulfilled lives with and got buried next to with a sign "bill and stephanie forever in this life and the next" I think the hard truth is women are not really evolved to be able to ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 03:19 AM
1

Right, but she rarely can refuse to mate if that strong mate got behind her lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 11:05 PM
0

I think it's not men that have a rape instinct. Its that women naturally never got a chance to decide who they mated with. In the environment the most female mammals evolved in.. there was no such thing as rape, because rape was the default state in that if a more physically strong animal wanted to sex you... You don't really have a say
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 11:14 AM
9

No. Here we discuss and debate points on their merit. Not with random labels and calls for silencing. If you want that head to the rest of Reddit that will happily label and ban. If you have a counter point state it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 11:11 AM
-4

Kek yfw patriarchy was literally holding up modern civilisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 11:10 AM
-1

Well.. Let's dig deeper. Would you say OP that women are morally bad for this behaviour? Or this is somehow women's fault or reflects negatively on their character as a gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 11:08 AM
2

No because this would destroy women and possibly humanity. Like imagine if nueralink came out with a product where you just slip into some kind of fantasy-matrix esque place where you were perpetually 18 experiencing young love with a hot young girl... Over and over again... Forever. Sometimes her friend happily gets involved. sometimes her mom wants some.. Sometimes it's the whole class. Sometimes the hot teacher ties you up and does sick things to you. Most guys in this case would never leave.…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 02:15 PM
–

I agree you are 100% right. But your post seems to make it seem like this is women's fault because they don't like the average man. That's not the case. Women don't don't find average men attractive in the same way you don't find men attractive as a man. Read that part again. It is extremely important,, the world makes a lot more sense. See men rate ALL women on the same scale. We don't put other men on this scale. We don't stop and think.. you know what Charlene is hotter than John. John is sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 01:38 PM
-3

In support of the OP I think this situation in dating is basically a prisoners dilemma gone wrong. Arranged marriage is both parties agreeing to split the reward. Men want to impregnate many many women. Women what to be impregnated by Chad. The mid way is each man only gets 1 woman. And each woman gets a guy approved by her parents that arent genetically programmes to chase chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 11:16 PM
–

If you ask a woman and listen closely to her response it is in line with this. For most guys they simply aren't attracted. This is something guys don't really experience as we have a slider of attraction on all women. Women don't really have a slider for all men. They have a slider for chads. But anything below that is really not viewed on the slider. The same way guys don't really view other guys on their hotness scale. Its not like there's a scale guys have in their head where jasmine is in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 01:45 AM
–

The problem is far deeper than that. Women can only have a few kids in their lives but men can have many kids with lots of women. From a gene spreading perspective a man's best play is to have a bunch of kids. A woman's best play... Is to have kids with a man.. that himself is going to have lots of kids with other women. Ie.. the optimal genetic reward is for women to reproduce with men that themselves have lots of other women. This is a woman's only way to genetically exponentially spread her g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 12:33 AM
1

This is truely blue pill thinking, yes women can be different in that some might like classic music and some might like rap. But there's a lot of commonality especially when it comes to reproductive psychology. I mean we could say men are all different some don't mind when they get cheated on and raise another guys kid. And you'd sort of be right.. some don't mind that at all. HOWEVER FOR LIKE 99% OF THEM THIS WOULD BE A HUGE PROBLEM.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 11:04 PM
3

I suppose there's a bit of spite as the men saying this are the same men that aren't successful with women when they were younger. Its very much the same as if you don't tolerate me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best. But more like: If you don't love me when I'm a 20 something intern earning 45k, You don't deserve me when I'm a 35 guy earning 150k.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 06:33 AM
1

But she's not valueless to other men just because she got it on with OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:10 PM
2

I think 1 male to 8-12 females would be optimal for a happiness point of view. But game theory shows 50/50 from a competition point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter