TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

uncertain_death Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by uncertain_death on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

My advice as the (now) only custodial parent. Be nice but always ready to tear her apart (legally, no violence that only fucks shit up) get a lawyer who is a total shark in court. This is not a game to play, this is your fucking child. Time to show your teeth.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:43 AM
1

I mean if you're really serious they do have that awful plastic sleeve thing. It comes at the cost of being mildly uncomfortable two both parties, if it doesn't rip it tear then it is essentially a trashbag.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:44 PM
3

Condoms, diaphragms, spermicides, vaginal barriers, the list goes on
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:44 PM
2

Agreed and as I was saying my mother wasn't for the complete cut. I wasn't either for a complete cut when my son started getting frequent infections. A little is better than nothing right?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:19 AM
2

Unfortunately for males in my family it happens a lot. How we've made it this far I have no idea.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:47 AM
1

I'm going to copy and paste what I wrote below I understand that, the problem was that the foreskin was so taught and angled that it caused my urethra to never breach. The ballooning is another thing of significance in this. My doctor decided after a year to present the option because I had a persistent infect. He also never removed more than a quarter of the foreskin to make the ability for my urethra to breach higher. He must have done something right that could help me because the infection n…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:07 PM
1

I just cut this out of what I posted below but it covers a lot of his decision. My doctor decided after a year to present the option because I had a persistent infect. He also never removed more than a quarter of the foreskin to make the ability for my urethra to breach higher.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:06 PM
0

I understand that, the problem was that the foreskin was so taught and angled that it caused my urethra to never breach. The ballooning is another thing of significance in this. My doctor decided after a year to present the option because I had a persistent infect. He also never removed more than a quarter of the foreskin to make the ability for my urethra to breach higher. He must have done something right that could help me because the infection never came back.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:05 PM
2

Okay let me put it this way. My urethra was having problems revealing. There is some pull back to the foreskin even at birth. Mine didnt.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 11:02 AM
4

I don't really know how to describe my circumcision. So that means its story time. At birth my foreskin would not pull back over the head. The doctor wanted to wait a little bit to see if that changed but it didn't. Worse I got a terrible infection at a year old. So my mother opted to have the very tip of the foreskin removed. Fast forward 19 years. My son was born with the very same problem. We waited it out. I opted to have the very top of his plastibelled. TL;DR: the human body is weird.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 10:18 AM
2

She deserves worse
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter