TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

unclefisty Archive

View 1 posts and 382 comments by unclefisty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

unclefisty/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:49 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

Pretty sure men are more likely to be violently attached by strangers so equity would mean prioritizing them.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 10:49 AM
1

Being banned only prevents you from commenting and starting threads.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/21 03:17 PM
13

I wish society was gyro centric. Think of all the delicious sandwhiches on every street corner
/r/MensRights08/02/20 10:07 AM
87

She got her nails done did and can't afford food for them.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 08:36 PM
18

He'll have a lifetime of new material now though.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 08:35 PM
3

It's in the best interests of the governments pocketbook, nothing more.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:01 PM
2

Because the state doesn't want to foot the bill of a child. As much as people like to shit on feminists for this happening a lot of the time it's TradCons who don't want the State to pay, they're happy to have whatever poor sod that can get pinned for it pay the bill. So you've got both sides happily fucking guys over.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 02:25 PM
13

On the flip side women are practically treated as property and can get the shit beaten out of them by the husbands almost consequence free. So forgive my lack of condolences.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:37 PM
12

The term landing would encompass both manned and unmanned missions to the moon's surface.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:46 PM
1

Right, because cultural stigmatism never prevents people from hiring women for traditionally male jobs or men for traditionally female jobs?
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:17 AM
1

Seing the Washington post using terms like "clapback" saddens me.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:43 AM
1

white men get harsher punishment that black women. That's because of sexism. Sexism and racism can interact.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 10:33 AM
2

Because they are often drive by reposts. I can understand people being upset that he shits out others comment for karma whoring.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:47 PM
8

If I walk up and punch you in the face and you don't fight back does that mean you consented to having your face punched?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:42 PM
3

"I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn't get there, and she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she's now got the big phony tits and everything." (It's not clear who Trump was talking about.) "I'm automatically attracted to beautiful [women]—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." That is not consent.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:12 PM
5

I don't think a regular ear piercing fits the actual definition of mutilation since it is generally reversible without any loss.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:01 PM
7

A flock of BroGulls.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 11:56 PM
-8

I'd heard that phrase before the movie came out.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 09:17 PM
-4

Ya know, now that I think about it that makes two of us.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:42 PM
-29

Not everyone has seen every movie. Also upon looking up the scene I don't see any part of him calling people faggots.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:30 PM
-35

Okay buddy, you can think what you want. But biology is what it is.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:06 PM
-31

Vaginas, and muscles in general, do not work like that.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:02 PM
2

https://youtu.be/SLlk0ROvcKA
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:45 AM
7

Like the aglet.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:02 AM
4

"private clubs" get broader authority to discriminate. In the end many businesses do illegal things but nobody complains so they get away with it.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 08:10 AM
4

It's a top down solution by generals that don't want their balls in the vice when troops do stupid shit and it goes public.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 07:08 PM
19

The military tends to get pissy about anything that might make the service look bad. There are still a lot of 1950's values in it.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:19 PM
232

Most states in the US are at will employment. Outside the US can be different.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 03:05 AM
1

I'm sure you have some compelling proof of this. http://www.nytimes.com/1994/01/22/us/lorena-bobbitt-acquitted-in-mutilation-of-husband.html?pagewanted=all A procession of witnesses corroborated Mrs. Bobbitt's account of marital abuse, saying they often saw her with bruises on her body. Two forensic psychologists and a psychiatrist from the hospital in Petersburg, all appointed by the court last fall to examine Mrs. Bobbitt, concluded she was a battered woman. They also concluded that she was se…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 10:51 AM
6

From what I read he'd been beating and abusing her for a long time so I would imagine that no she did not feel any remorse.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:29 PM
1

I never said it was.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 08:05 PM
4

Hormone blocking treatment. If he stops taking them things go about their natural course. Slight but important distinction.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 06:36 PM
98

Did YOU just assume xer gender?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 05:33 PM
539

As soon as she grows a penis.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 04:15 PM
1

https://youtu.be/IGQjaSJP2Xg?t=1m https://youtu.be/j2suVx9cDKw Have fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 06:02 PM
2

It's even cringier if you watch a video of her saying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 05:52 PM
1

That makes more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 05:35 PM
1

I'd take that in the white house.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 05:26 PM
2

This is my biggest concern with her. She will either push through Garland or someone more liberal and RB Ginsburg will retire and Hillary will try and pack in another very liberal judge. Between that and Hillary I can see gun rights getting shredded.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 05:26 PM
2

And get all that WiFi garbage out of our kids schools! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 05:23 PM
1

Cheney wasn't religious or tradcon?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 05:22 PM
12

More like 'umongous wot?
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:06 PM
4

I consider myself average and If any not ugly girl approached me I'd be looking for the worm and hook.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 01:12 PM
22

Holy fucking keyboard commando.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:22 AM
1

Don't care about legs or armpits. No oral if the bush is too big.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:27 PM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:25 PM
22

The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 04:33 PM
1

The major aim is sex tourism, but if you can reduce the demand for services the supply should go down as well.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:33 PM
5

The idea is to fight sex trafficking and slavery
/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:20 AM
7

Traveling to another country to have sex with someone under the age of consent in the US is a felony.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:35 AM
7

If they say anything it will be about how this is just patriarchy backfiring, because only a sexist patriarchal judge would think that all men love sex all the time.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 12:13 AM
3

That's not standard crazy, that's advanced crazy.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:41 PM
37

The girl Kayla left with on the rescue boat eventually went back to grab stuff that she had left behind. According to Kayla, she told Emad off in front of everyone. His friends gave her high-fives and said he was in the wrong. Those friends names? Albert Einstein. I bet they even slipped the girl a $100 bill.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/16 08:45 PM
2

Economy of scale should be able to bring that down.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:59 PM
1

It is a bit of a paradox.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:19 PM
-2

Really depends on how drunk, there is a point where someone can be too drunk to consent.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:10 PM
2

Isn't sex without consent kinda the definition of rape?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:34 PM
9

I think a big thing is that not only can a false rape accusation ruin peoples lives, it's much harder to fight against, even before the "listen and believe" narrative. If I say Bob punch me in the face and I've got a black eye (even if it's not from him) it's a bit more believable, and if there isn't a mark on me people will probably think I'm full of shit. If you have a dead body riddled with bullets than odds are very high the person was murdered. But rape is more about a lack of consent. Whic…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:29 PM
2

You'll notice the thread is still here. You can advocate for punishing false rape accusers without wishing them to be raped themselves. Is it that much to say "hey, don't wish rape on other people" that your jimmies are rustled?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:16 PM
2

It does not achieve this by allowing members of the public to escalate situations to suit their own ego or John Wayne ambitions. Are you going to bring up my penis size next? That's usually where things go from here. Should he actually put his threat into action, at the very moment where you reasonably and fully believe he is imminently about do do you harm, yes, self defense can be served by firing. Preferably a non lethal hit if you have the skill to do so, but noone would blame you for making…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:59 PM
2

You may wish to keep in mind that he is not from the US, I'm guessing the UK.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:50 PM
3

I could shoot you dead for disagreeing with my opinion in an overly vociferous way. I missed the part where any reasonable person could consider that a threat to your life. And justice is served in self defense by the actions of the righteous being reasonable and proportionate to the situation. Which is exactly what the law requires here. Let's be honest here, it doesn't require reasonable and proportionate, it requires whatever a jury of people think might be have been reasonable or proportiona…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:49 PM
9

If someone is threatening your life why should you be required to give THEM a chance to retreat before defending yourself? Do you mean some random guy just standing in a dark alley playing with a knife then what kind of straw man situation is that? Are there really people out there whose hobbies include back alley knife fondling in the dark?
/r/MensRights15/08/16 11:12 AM
15

So, again, man with switchblade: Possible threat level: Fatal. Proportionate force: Almost anything. So long as it doesn't exceed the threat level he poses (you can't just whip out a 9 and blow his head off) Why the fuck not? What the fuck is wrong with your country that using lethal force against someone threatening you with a knife is considered wrong? Don't want to get shot? Don't threaten peoples lives. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:57 AM
4

Watch out we got a badass over here.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:49 AM
25

Well they did try to create a European Union unilaterally once before.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 04:44 PM
1

That's their secret captain, it's always about gender.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 04:15 PM
2

With a brush that broad you could paint a whole barn at once.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:40 PM
1

https://youtu.be/X_DVS_303kQ
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:38 PM
38

Get crushed by the boot of government anyways.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 01:01 AM
8

There will always be a sucker around to fund stupid shit. Just gotta look hard enough to find them.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 08:08 PM
1

Useful idiot.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 02:53 AM
0

You started out good until you went down the sexist rape apology crazy hole.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 02:06 PM
1

My wife has a lot of pressure from other women in her family who work from home to do things she just doesn't have time to do (parties, church stuff, vacations, etc.) I work from home a lot (developer and consultant), and she gets a lot of negative comments from her family and friend about my taking on the primary caretaker role for our kids. While I have no proof of this I believe that women are the ones most likely to tear down and shame other women.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 12:38 PM
3

Feminists are about as organized as a bag full of cats.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 12:13 PM
6

Have two brothers in law that leach off the women they're with. And society at large will look down upon them as lesser creatures. Women who do this face far less criticism, and in some cases this is treated as a laudable accomplishment. So I do agree that both sexes can do this, but it's not treated the same way.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 12:03 PM
43

They don't assume they are ignorant, they assume they are stupid or suffering from "Internalized misogyny"
/r/MensRights03/07/16 01:35 AM
4

Yes, but that's also in Sweden not the US.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:23 PM
5

Eco movement Rings made of plastic. Who needs self awareness?
/r/MensRights29/05/16 04:20 PM
1

Pretty sure relationship status of the other parent has no effect on support orders.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:15 PM
3

In Michigan a friend of mine got socked by her boyfriend, she called the cops because he wouldn't leave the house, which she owns, she didnt want him charged, just gone. From what I've been told the prosecutor is pursuing charges anyways.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 11:02 AM
3

Something something patriarchy backfiring
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:29 AM
4

Defintions of mutilate from Webster and Oxford are pretty good description of circumcision. Yes it's not a pressing medical need. Not only did the human race survive for thousands of years before circumcision but plenty of people survive in the modern world without it as well. Yes there are times when it is needed, no they are not common. So? So you are also against getting ears piercing until your 18? Many cultures do many things for aesthetic reasons. No I am against it until the child underst…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 10:14 PM
5

It's the surgical mutilation of an infant for no pressing medical need, often done purely for aesthetic reasons. So yeah it's a problem.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:31 PM
9

MRA's should support gay men. But I also think that gay men will have many issues unrelated to being a man. So we should support gay men, but they will probably be well served by having a group dedicated to gay rights as well.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:31 PM
25

As she was being arrested, she “repeatedly” asked the police for a “break and to let her go,” saying she just broke up with a boyfriend and was “having a lot of issues.” She said she was a dental hygienist and helped people, the judge wrote. PUSSY PASS. Ok, so it looks like it was a shitty search, so in that case it would make sense to suppress any evidence obtained from that search. But they didn't actually learn anything incriminating from it! This is fucking pants on head retarded.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:36 PM
1

I'm not saying you shouldnt be allowed to buy a gun but fuck, maybe we should need references or something. Simply reading through the manual that came with it would have shown him how to properly clear it.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:34 PM
-2

Because if owning guns was that easily and universally recognized the people who hate guns head's would explode. Also you have a constitutional right to own guns, but not cars so some of the restrictions on cars would be unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:33 PM
5

You may have "had" a shotgun at that age but legally you can't own one until you're at least 18. Anytime you're in possession of it you have to have an adult supervising you. That may not be what happened when you were a kid, but that is generally the law in most states.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:31 PM
1

Make them cooks, base mechanics, and armorers. There are things they can do that dont involve physical strength as much.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:58 PM
5

It started with the plural of anecdote not being data, then you claimed I denied the existence of patriarchy. So when I talk about not believing in it I'm the one moving goal posts?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:27 PM
7

You're moving the goal posts now. Hard to think there is some grand power structure perpetuated by men when we are the only ones who have to sign up for the draft, are considered the aggressor in most domestic violence situations regardless of reality, and are subject to genital mutilation in first world countries.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:03 PM
17

A small sample of people do not prove the existance of patriarchy
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:48 PM
65

My wife wanted our son circumcised. I fought with her over it until she agreed to not have it done. So your anecdote holds as much weight as mine. None.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:34 PM
9

With dishonorable mention to those who will claim it's not actually mutilation.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:37 PM
2

Thats a nice reputation you have there, it would be a shame if something were to happen to it.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:05 PM
1

In Michigan food items have no state sales tax on them. Having said that, the whole petition is pants on head retarded.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:03 AM
5

Michigan. No sales tax on food items.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:01 AM
43

FAT SHAMER! FAT SHAMER!
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:57 AM
1

Barber shops generally are not private clubs, it's an important difference.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 11:22 AM
6

Unless she can convince a judge it was sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 01:13 PM
0

Have they never heard of a fucking library?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:58 AM
1

"If you need a gun to feel like a REAL man..." This always makes me want to slap the shit out of people.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 12:23 PM
3

Which I said only get food for about six months. Childbirth is hard on a body.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:06 PM
2

It does. A man with a dependent child is free to apply just as a woman with a dependent child is. The food package for the mother and the food package for the child are separate things. Pregnant women get food to help make sure they are getting the proper nutrition to prevent birth defects of the unborn child. Breast feeding women get food to make sure they get enough nutrition to have a good milk supply for their child. Breast feeding is much better for a child than formula and the government h…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:03 PM
2

That sounds like anti male discrimination by a grocery store worker, not the WIC program.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:56 PM
2

The income means testing is based on the income of the whole family, in my case they base it on a family of four, me, my wife, and my two children. They count income from both my wife and me.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:56 PM
2

Post partum women only get benefits for like six months afterwards.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:55 PM
2

Yes. Because you have to be pregant or recently pregnant to qualify, not just female. The benefits for kids are considered to be given to them.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:34 PM
1

If that's how you want to look at it. I never felt that my parenting skills were disparaged by the program.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:05 PM
2

"The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides Federal grants to States for supplemental foods, health care referrals, and nutrition education for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and non-breastfeeding postpartum women, and to infants and children up to age five who are found to be at nutritional risk." Because it's not about parents and the name was already long enough. I seriously don't understand what you are getting so wrapped around the axle a…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:57 AM
2

Well it's not for parents, it's for pregnant women and young children.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:54 AM
3

The "Women" part refers to pregnant women. The child is eligible for wic benefits regardless of the gender of their parent.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:40 AM
1

Not that would be valid in any court in the US, or likely any court in the world.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:38 AM
0

He supported the attempt in 2013 to pass a second Assault Weapons ban, he supports limiting magazine capacities to ten or less rounds and he supports universal background checks. Maybe he's better than Hilary, but I don't consider him good either.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:37 PM
10

http://clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/First_Lady/html/generalspeeches/1998/19981117.html Paragraph eight I believe.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:40 PM
1

You'd have to be exceeding naive or stupid to join ISIS as a woman. Or brainwashed, guess that would work too.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:31 PM
4

You are correct. Also we are not baboons.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:59 PM
16

THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:54 PM
1

That would depend on which culture and time period you are talking about.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:19 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/UVzSE3G.jpg
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:33 AM
3

The La Rochelle prosecutor's office said in a statement Thursday that the DNA samples from 539 students and staff will be destroyed. Yeah color me skeptical on that one. Government never willingly destroys data.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:26 AM
-6

There were times of history where women were considered the property of their husbands.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:07 AM
5

Can a brother get a NSFL tag?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:49 AM
7

You know what is truly stress and pain free? Not chopping off parts of babies genitals. It's so easy you don't even have to do anything to do it.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:35 AM
2

There are two basic groups of left wing. Progressive and liberal. The ones who are actually liberal (as in following the definition of the word) are the ones you know as opposing discrimination. Progressives on the other hand will happily discriminate against what they consider to be the oppressive majority or those otherwise in the wrong. They claim this discrimination is perfectly ok and that it is there to benefit the less fortunate.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:38 AM
5

Stop trying to pigeonhole people and just let them answer how they feel like.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:01 AM
4

I'm hoping someone has an idea how best to move forward. Realistic job based standards that are applied to everyone.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:13 AM
20

You forgot to remove "construed as"
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:48 PM
4

YEAH, TAKE THE LEMONS!
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:36 AM
4

Bring up male genital mutilation and youll be shouted down about how FGM is like eleventy times worse (disregarding that there are multiple types of FGM some similar to circumcision) and therefore more importants. Even trying to bring up the topic if "genital mutilation for anyone is bad lets stop it for everyone" will get you shunned by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:24 PM
3

If a 32-year-old woman narrowly escaped being beaten and taken prisoner by an assailant, would the same logic apply? Of course not #yesallwomen
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:52 AM
1

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensch
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:14 PM
0

It's also Yiddish. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensch Not sure which usage the author meant.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:13 PM
0

Yeah... 9th century German. Not the German language that was in use during the time the Nazi party came to power.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:47 AM
0

mensch You know that mensch is Yiddish and not German right?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:30 AM
7

The professionally made "boycott doubletree" signs really speak to the grass roots of this movement. /s
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:22 AM
2

It seems like every internet asshole dudebro, redpiller, or PUA get's lumped in with MRAs when it's convenient to make them look bad.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:18 AM
2

There are always going to be those who call themselves MRAs who in actually have an ideology that would be better suited to /r/TheRedPill
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:16 AM
3

The high school anarchists never seem to get that if they got their way they'd be one of the first ones up against the wall and shot. Society doesn't take kindly to people who are constantly massive assholes and when there is less penalty for just beating the shit out of someone or outright shooting them for being a constant asshole and drain on the community it's a lot more tempting to take that violent solution.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:14 AM
1

Because ignorance and feels.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:26 AM
3

You would need to find the definition for that state it took place in for it to be relevant. Connecticut in this case.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:25 AM
10

There are also the ones that say that men don't need any more rights, because all the terrible things that happen to men are really just the patriarchy backfiring and if we stopped being such oppressive shitlords things would get better for everyone.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:12 AM
19

With all the shit I hear these days I wouldnt fuck any girl in college that wasnt stone sober and initiating the act.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:56 PM
2

When the mens right movement is being tarred over it, then yeah it is relevant.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:36 PM
2

If it had been a woman doing this would we be claiming how this was all the fault of crazy feminism? Of course not, because we aren't fucking insane.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:34 PM
22

Because when they are even willing to admit it exists they believe that since there isn't some hidden shadow council trying to oppress them that it's perfectly fine! TL;DR, Misandry don't real When misandry does real men deserve it.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:05 PM
2

Care to elaborate why?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:44 PM
4

Dude you didn't just stick your dick in crazy, you reproduced with it. Good luck man.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:27 PM
2

So obviously, the victims in this situation, would be terrified of being assaulted by the justice system over an act which they had got consent for. One could almost say they had been raped by such a system
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:40 AM
3

Because the will of a large group of people isn't always the greatest thing.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:25 AM
1

I don't think you have any clue not only how soul chilling terrifying your proposal is but how unworkable it is as well.
/r/PussyPass03/05/14 10:28 AM
2

Joe Biden is not a smart man.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:50 AM
2

I believe that would satisfy the requirements of the law. It's probably far easier to just add changing stations to existing restrooms than add another room for changing even if you are building a new structure anyways.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:29 AM
0

That's exactly what the article was about. Did you not read it?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:27 AM
2

Shitty title is shitty. Actual advice given. "If any customer has concerns about such behaviour, believing there may be a sinister motive, they are advised to speak to our staff or the British Transport Police."
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:12 PM
2

"Prosecutorial discretion"
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:48 PM
7

I see much ado about nothing.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:08 PM
4

The reason they think that was is because it is an option. It may not be one all women like, but legally it is there. Men have no such counterpart option.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 10:43 AM
2

I think men should be able to relinquish paternity up until the point of viability of the fetus, assuming he has been notified of the pregnancy. Women can choose to end a pregnancy for any reason up to the point of viability so why should men only be able to end responsibility if they sign before hand?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 10:35 AM
1

I'm not sure if people hate you because you're being sarcastic and they miss it or because your sarcastic analogy makes them feel stupid.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:51 AM
83

Oh come on you know it will be the men being marked as rapists.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:01 PM
1

But, but, she was afraid of being slut shamed by THE PATRIARCHY, so it's all mens fault.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:39 PM
2

The defendant in the case, Michael Robertson, 32, had been accused of secretly videotaping and photographing women who sat across from him wearing skirts on an MBTA trolley on two separate occasions in 2010. He allegedly aimed his cellphone camera directly between their legs. You can come back and make some more personal attacks and internet toughguy allusions after you've actually read the article in question.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:07 PM
2

Yes he was aiming them up their skirt, as they were sitting on the train. He wasn't touching them in any way or moving their clothing. If how you are sitting or standing combined with your clothing choice allows people to see your underwear that's your problem, not societies. In this case it IS legal regardless of what I think. I don't want people being arrested for photographing what can be seen when both parties are in a public space unless someone would otherwise have an expectation of privac…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:01 PM
2

Part of the reason I knew was I remember reading about it when this was big in the news a couple months ago, probably when the case was first started.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 06:56 PM
-1

The train is public transit. She was probably sitting in a way that exposed part of her panties. How else do you think he took the picture without sticking his camera up her skirt?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:33 PM
3

By realizing that legally you have no expectation of privacy in public and that if you expose part of yourself in public you might have a picture taken of it. The guy wasn't stuffing his camera up girls skirts, he was taming pictures of what he could see.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 04:31 PM
2

If I took a picture a picture of a girl walking down the street and jerked off to it that would be illegal under your proposal, but that would never pass constitutional muster.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:12 PM
38

PATRIARCHY PATRIARCHY PATRIARCHYYYYYYY
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:41 AM
1

If you click on the link that says why, it will explain that it was done because people would say things to get upvotes, then later edit them to something shitty to make the sub look bad.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 10:09 PM
1

/u/rightsbot is a bot, not a real person. It automatically copies posts to another board. This happens for every submission to mensrights.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 09:46 PM
3

True. I think men still attempt less, though only because they succeed more. A man is more likely to hang himself or eat a shotgun than eat a bottle of pills.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 06:01 PM
1

I thought MRa were supposed to actually be for everyone's rights unlike those that just claim they are.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:41 PM
8

BUT BUT WOMEN ATTEMPT SUICIDE MORE THAN MEN! Ignoring that men succeed more often.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:39 PM
4

I doesn't help that there are droves of people who either think prison rape is a feature and not a bug or who just make a joke of it.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:35 PM
3

Only idiots will publicly say they want inequality regardless of the truth. The smarter ones just lie.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:33 PM
10

Yeah generally people don't like being hit with negative labels regardless of the truth.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 11:43 AM
6

I wonder how many times she has offered to help a guy who was having problems with something? (Probably none)
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:53 PM
12

The reason the graphic doesn't mention prison rape is because the sources used don't take prison rape into account.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:05 PM
2

Make it so women have to have hair just as short. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:43 AM
2

Fucks given=zero.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:09 AM
0

Now the pendulum seems to swinging the other way they'll ignore or outright silence a white woman in favor of a woman of color.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:01 AM
4

You know you're talking to a bot... right?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:58 AM
2

Stockholm syndrome?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:01 PM
6

If he even survived ten months in prison, meanwhile society is making "prison rape lol AMIRITE?" jokes left and right.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 12:17 PM
1

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. Friedrich Nietzsche Just because your opponents are dehumanizing others does not mean you should do it yourself as well.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:44 PM
5

Nope but male judges and politicians have been just as willing to fuck over other men as females in similar roles.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:51 AM
7

Trans men are special men. Any discussion of their problems would almost certainly center on those that arise from being trans, not ones that arise from being male regardless of which problems where affecting the person in question the most.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:48 AM
3

There are certainly some feminists that do not consider trans women to be women. I think they tend towards the more radical side of feminism.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:47 AM
2

I would imagine because the Dailymail source was far easier to find. Yes they are not perfect but if someone is going to complain about them they should make a factual argument instead of the equivalent of "Hurr hurr dailymail amiright guys?"
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:38 AM
12

http://www.folkestoneherald.co.uk/Woman-false-rape-claim-sentenced/story-20521561-detail/story.html http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentish_express/news/rape-lies-12002/
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:36 AM
2

Suggesting that people hide from tigers is victim blaming tiger enabling. We need to teach tiger cubs not to turn into tigers.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:19 PM
2

That's the way feminists tend to see rape in the US, hence rape culture etc.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:03 PM
4

I'm guessing you've never seen the "teach your son not to rape" thing then?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:33 PM
5

Imagine a friend of yours is going to a city that has a large problem with wild tigers roaming the streets. Being a good friend you tell your friend how to spot a tiger, avoid a tiger, and what to do if attacked by a tiger. A number of feminists would berate you for victim blaming and being a tiger enabler and tell you the proper thing to do is to teach tiger cubs not to be tigers. If you try to explain that teaching people to protect themselves from tigers does not mean that tiger control polic…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:00 PM
5

Other than partisan sniping what is your point?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:25 PM
1

16 year old neckbeard Generally you only get one or the other.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:02 AM
3

That's Womyn you shitlord oppressor!
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:17 AM
1

Given he imbalance between male and female in the Chinese population they can afford to be picky.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:59 PM
2

Well thus outta get interesting.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:00 PM
10

You couldn't just link the original instead of being a pretentious "let me google that for you" dickbag?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:00 PM
11

If you're going to make a factual claim the burden is on you to prove it.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 11:59 AM
7

That's probably legit. The temperance movement had it's own number of crazies in it.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 04:21 PM
1

A pussy move would be when he told the judge that he had a suspicious feeling that his kids wouldn't be safe around the ex-wife, and so got her permanently removed from their lives (except every second Saturday.) Given that they have no children the judge would probably just think he was insane.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:51 PM
1

Wasn't sure if serious till the end. Maybe they all have short attention spans.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:29 PM
3

I also work in retail and men are overwhelming more likely to be asked to go push carts in if extra help is needed for it.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:46 AM
3

Ain't nobody got time for that!
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:40 AM
7

A lot of other parts of the human body get dirty easily, we don't chop them off of babies though.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:39 AM
3

Minorities tend to be on the receiving end of shitty broad brush arguments pretty often, perhaps that is why.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:46 AM
1

Yeah totally doesn't happen at all. These news stories must all be fake.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:42 AM
-1

Because no man has ever tossed himself on a grenade, stormed a machine gun nest, jumped into a burning vehicle, etc for love of his brothers in battle. Oh wait, yeah actually that does happen.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:51 PM
7

The solution to something that is broken isn't to make it brokener.
/r/PussyPass22/12/13 10:50 PM
0

If he's such a terrible guy why didn't she file the police report?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:36 PM
1

Don't you know rape is far worse than murder anyways? /s
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:27 PM
24

Something nice, because being a d-bag only perpetuates the stereotype of MRA being idiotic broskis.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:25 AM
5

Because being given a stern talking to by the dean about how if they are raping people they should really stop that will totally just shut those rapists down.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:14 PM
1

There is any life outside of that? The real world sounds scary.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:10 PM
2

These college "courts" are disgusting. The policy should be to leave criminal matters to the police and simply expel those convicted of violent crimes involving other students.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:28 AM
10

Because penis, something something deadbeat fathers, and "whats best for the child"
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:13 PM
1

Ok, ya got me there
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:45 AM
12

You mean rape and a rapist right?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 12:07 AM
3

Satire, that's why.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 11:39 PM
2

You are correct on both points.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 11:02 AM
3

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-08-27/national/35492354_1_preventive-services-health-law-men-and-women :(
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:18 PM
1

Yes generally if you subsidize things you get more of it.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:11 PM
50

It's free for women because the ACA mandates that it be free for women http://www.hrsa.gov/womensguidelines/ I doubt there is any such mandate for men.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:28 AM
2

I did. Cost me about 750$ for the vasectomy because my insurance doesn't cover them.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:24 AM
2

As I said to another person. It doesn't matter if you speak truth if you end your speech by spouting insults. You will change no minds this way, but you will be held up as an example of how terrible MRA's are.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 12:34 AM
1

It doesn't matter if you speak truth if you end your speech by spouting insults. You will change no minds this way, but you will be held up as an example of how terrible MRA's are.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 12:24 AM
0

Yes I'm aware of what she said.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:27 PM
4

Do you really think it's a comparable level of trauma though? Do you think that in five years she will still be shaken up by having her laptop stolen?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:19 AM
1

If they're not using them that's their own problem. It should not be used as an excuse to mutilate baby boys. Also, yes fuck the church.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 12:07 AM
6

Miss Hewson, a barrister at Hardwicke Chambers, added: “It seems to me, simply factually, we all know if you’re drunk you are more likely to have accidents. So if you fall off a bar stool and hit you head and have a serous brain injury because you’re drunk people are gong to say well you chose to be drunk. Rape is not an accident. You don't fall off a bar stool and rape your head on the floor. Can't we just stick to blaming rapists for rape and not anyone else?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:34 PM
2

Also not too many people end up with emotional scars from having their car stolen.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:32 PM
2

Condoms work far better Kenya has a massively higher rate of AID/HIV infection than the US.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:30 PM
1

Aren't you just a sweet ray of sunshine.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:10 AM
5

You're trying to mud wrestle with a pig.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:13 PM
1

I think I just became stupider from reading this.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:12 PM
8

I'm not sure if I'm more or less horrified after I realized your post was satire.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 11:47 PM
1

How many feminist bake sales outside of the US do you think there are though?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:44 AM
1

And when they are giving you drugs to make you not have a baby that would be different that what the article is about.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:16 PM
1

This is related to a discussion of women giving birth how?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 10:46 PM
7

Do you actually know how most of the medications used during labor work? It's not like they shoot them full of morphine and wait for the kid to pop out.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:39 PM
2

Why? So that women can't be charged with rape as long as they don't forcibly penetrate a male?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:08 PM
4

Oh look, it's two idiots arguing, best course of action is just not to get in the middle of the mud slinging, unless you like being coated in mud that is.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:04 PM
11

Yes there are times when Dr or nurses just do things willy nilly during procedures without forewarning the patient. Yes it is wrong and horribly unprofessional for it to be done and it should be reported to the appropriate conduct board or if you feel necessary the police as it could possibly qualify as some form of assault or battery, but I think most courts would find that a stretch. However calling it "birth rape" is sensationalism that does the authors position no good.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:59 PM
11

Women are rarely unconscious during the birthing process. Even with an epidural/intrathecal consent is easy to obtain.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:56 PM
1

I'm not sure what you mean by "equally drunk" if you mean equally inebriated (and by equally the exact same) that's not terribly easy to prove, if you mean by blood alcohol content that's fairly easy to prove if you have the data, which isn't always available. In the US stumbling drunk or beyond will almost certainly get you charged with rape it's the area between that and slightly buzzed that is murkey as to what will happen to you. Which is why from a "I don't want to get arrested for rape, re…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 11:44 AM
1

What would this relatively light sentence be?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 11:14 AM
1

Maybe he wants to be edgy, but not quite THAT edgy. Personally people that do things like that to try and get past swear filters (real or imagined) or to try and convey the same idea as swearing without actually doing so look like they have the maturity of a 12 year old.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 11:14 AM
1

Yes actually people that are drunk beyond a certain point are not considered able to consent If two people actually are equally drunk, which is not an easy standard to quantify because alcohol affects people differently, then both are responsible which means no one should be charged.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 11:10 AM
2

A lot of young people are not taught about the actual effects alcohol has on a person like lowering of inhibitions, memory loss, and that once you are past a certain point of drunkenness you cannot consent to anything. Edit: to add the word certain that I forgot to type.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 10:59 AM
1

It's satire man. The last paragraph really gives it away.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 10:52 AM
2

I said they have about the same death rate I didn't say anything about the ages of those that were killed. Or do people over a certain age not count to you or did you just not read what I said?
/r/MensRights21/10/13 04:16 PM
2

Really glad I totally love it now It's hard to take you seriously on this when you have zero experience owning an uncircumcised dick.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:59 AM
2

Canada being one of the countries you named as terrible.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:57 AM
1

The fact that the colleges even get involved in this disgusts me. If someone has been raped or claims to have been raped you don't contact the college you call the fucking police. Instead of letting the justice system handle it they set up these unaccountable kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:23 AM
3

Then why the hell did you put chemical castration in the title?
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:15 AM
2

Depo Provera is not a sterilizing agent. It's meant as inject able birth control for women. I'm not saying it wouldn't do bad things to a guy but it's also not for them. I think her point was to insist that men have to use birth control along with women. Yes she made an idiot of herself but sensationalizing it does us no help.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:15 AM
10

Breast cancer and prostate cancer have almost the same death rate. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html#incidence-mortality http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html#incidence-mortality
/r/MensRights21/10/13 10:52 AM
1

You reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:06 AM
7

Please to be showing me where women are married at gunpoint in the US, forcibly impregnated and made to care for their rape babies. Oh you mean getting married, having kids, and staying home to care for them is purely a personal choice? Then why are we making people pay for that choice when divorces occur?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:35 AM
1

Society wants a cut and dried line in the sand on this so that's what we have. I'm not saying it's good or bad, just that it is.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 10:46 AM
2

The next court up would likely be your state supreme court. So yes you can appeal the decision. Doing so will probably be expensive. If you don't pay you can be arrested, have your assets seized or wages garnished. Do not stiff the court or they will fuck you pretty hard.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 10:29 AM
2

Its a rite that has led to the transmission of herpes in many cases.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 01:15 AM
2

I am confused as to what relation this has to what I said.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:22 PM
4

What right do you have to anything from a private company?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 10:19 AM
7

Also she spent a whole FOUR DAYS in an actual prison.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:36 AM
2

Some people just love to hate.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:25 AM
5

cis male Seeing her bring this up when it's totally irrelevant to the conversation speaks a lot.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:00 AM
4

It IS a functional piece of the penis though. Just because people may claim otherwise does not invalidate the argument or the validity of the statement.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:40 AM
2

You're removing part of another person genitals without their consent. How is that not harm?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:31 AM
4

You don't see a problem with surgically altering the genitals of babies without their consent?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:27 AM
2

I think "ears" was what he was going for.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:26 AM
5

This is where I tell you what my parents told me when I was a kid. There are two kinds of attention, the good kind and the bad kind.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:11 AM
3

If you don't get AVOICEFORMEN.COM, STFU! It's right in your title. Your title is the first impression you will have on people.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:02 AM
3

The end is nigh!
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:45 AM
3

If you tell people to shut up if they don't agree with you you're gonna be told to fuck off. Especially when you do it to people who are nominally on your side.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:44 AM
2

You get more converts with kindness than a bat to the skull.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 11:54 PM
26

Have you considered having a serious discussion with her about it? If she refuses that would settle it though. Also having the complete context would be nice...
/r/MensRights30/09/13 11:53 PM
2

Op your title is bad and you should feel bad. It was about young teen girls take non nude sexy pictures.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:26 AM
2

If by "the same" you mean the same percentage of our income then maybe you are right.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:32 PM
4

Well for one it's the standard of evidence required for practically every other criminal proceeding.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:20 PM
2

Yeah but those in power dont care about that
/r/MensRights27/09/13 06:02 PM
8

The young and healthy subsidize the risk of the old. That's why everyone is required to get insurance.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:28 PM
2

The same women who say "he should have used a condom(like they never break)" or "he should have known he could make a baby before having sex" as a reason that a man should accept responsibility for a child he may not want would very likely defend to the death the mothers right to abort her child at any time for any reason she chose.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:41 AM
3

Private property rights
/r/MensRights26/09/13 12:57 AM
12

Actually those quotes are from their attackers.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 12:55 AM
1

The writer wants all women to be 1950's home makers, this is not someone we want to be associated with.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:08 PM
2

So if I was a Swiss citizen and refused to show the cops wouldn't arrest me? I highly doubt that. It's called conscription for a reason, it's not optional.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:05 PM
2

Yeah we've only been engaged in warfare with two countries for some ten odd years, yet people still join the military knowing there is a chance they will be shipped off to fight. Do you think no one will join the military if they are not compelled to?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:03 PM
2

How hard is it to understand that surgically altering children with no immediate medical need is horrifically wrong? If I told you that chopping off the tips of my children's pinkies was part of my culture or religion you'd look at me like a horrible monster. Lopping off part of a boys penis though? "Parental choice"
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:12 PM
1

Reason and truth doesn't get the same page views that a shrieking screed does.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:06 PM
2

Considering the number of women who do actually die of breast cancer in the US you're argument probably holds better statistical weight than circumcision does. Horrifying yes, but likely to save more lives.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:04 PM
2

You're completely ignoring the whole coercion by force part.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:56 PM
2

The US has a standing professional Army but does not have conscription. It's not a one or the other kind of thing.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:55 PM
2

So it's ok to forcibly conscript someone against their will just because they won't be physically harmed or killed?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:54 PM
10

But yet you don't blame the patriarchy for it! What a concept.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:44 PM
3

One could argue that he was criticized for not being manly enough though. He does mention that one of the insults flung at him was about him possibly shaving his legs. Because you know, hairless legs is unmanly. The fact that people spat forth so much vitriol over a man sitting on a bench with a typewriter is saddening.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:44 PM
1

As a father I can say that man is soooo gonna get pissed on
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:14 AM
6

fuck common law marriage
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:09 AM
3

Yep 0% chance of STD's, unwanted pregnancies, or rape without a penis. Why stop at just the tip? /s
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:26 PM
12

Which is also disturbing.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:03 PM
1

If they had stuck to "the basics" part they'd have been just fine.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:48 PM
3

When telling her that men are not inherently bad, she told me to shut the fuck up This here tells you a lot about her
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:34 PM
8

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me"
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:32 PM
6

My usual response to people claiming that it reduces STD chances is that a condom will reduce them even further and doesn't involve chopping off bits of baby boys penises
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:31 PM
2

Well Im glad I've made someones day brighter today.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:13 PM
15

That fact that mutilating any infants genitals without a clear life threatening reason doesn't cause these peoples souls to shriek in horror deeply disturbs me.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:08 PM
5

How dare you use absolute numbers instead of percentage differences to make your argument look better you shitlord! /s
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:07 PM
1

Not that I support circumcision but part of the reason it could still be there from an evolution standpoint is that is doesn't kill anyone so the trait never gets weeded out.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:06 PM
2

Wrong type of course is defined as whatever she wants it to be at that moment.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:41 PM
1

The plural of anecdote is not data.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:35 PM
6

How dare he use her publicly made statements as evidence! /s
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:09 PM
1

Since you were a capitalization pedant to someone earlier I'll return it to you. Libertarians and libertarians are different.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:43 PM
2

Saying the goverment shouldn't have it's thumb in every businesses pie is not racism.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:38 PM
2

The 911 call and claims of violence were made by his wife.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:14 AM
5

A number of women begin to love and care about the child from the moment they find out they are pregnant. Also the word you're looking for is quantify.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:53 AM
6

"soon a reality" Article is ten years old.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:50 AM
1

And we could arrest those that grope too! It would be like a one two punch!
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:56 PM
3

I agree that he was expressing his personal opinion. But when you are a company executive your actions do tend to reflect on the company. There is probably a clause in his contract (I would be surprised if he was not a contractual employee) that says if you make the company look bad you can get fired.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:45 PM
9

Easily could have charged him with poisoning or drugging her. The whole clown nose on/clown nose off of abortion only being murder when it's not done by the mother is monstrous. It's either murder or not murder.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:42 PM
1

Bitter much?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:40 PM
7

She will never have the baby she was going to have. She can have another child, but it will never be the same child.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:39 PM
3

Do you know the differences between the male and female reproductive system and how BC acts on the female reproductive system? You answer lies there.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:36 PM
15

This guy isn't a misogynist, at least based on the tweets, he's just an asshole. People seem to think that misogyny= saying anything icky about girls. You can not hate girls and still be sexist or an asshole.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:29 PM
3

The opinions of people in power of a company reflect on the company itself. If you happen to be a major asshole and speak your assholetry to the public you'll usually get canned.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:27 PM
3

Well how many rapists will admit to it really?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:15 PM
81

Did anyone notice how he is once again Hispanic now?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:13 PM
23

Obviously the clever devil ate the evidence
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:13 PM
6

They might after review. But I would be surprised
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:12 PM
25

This is one of the best explanations I've seen, bravo sir.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:12 PM
1

Hmm it would appear I missed that.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:54 PM
-2

You'll note of course that no where is the word "rape" actually used. If this had happened to a women and the same wording was used there would be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Derp: it appears I missed it. Happily the criminal sexual misconduct laws in my state (MI) are genderless.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:44 AM
1

She was probably raped herself by a dress code in the past do this is all she knows.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:42 PM
7

Male privilege is being able to choose not to go to college.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:41 AM
0

I think the government will be wanting a cut. You thinking get out from under alimony is hard? Try taxes.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:40 AM
4

"Can you believe these bitches?"
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:12 AM
1

I think he meant "it doesn't exist in California"
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:25 PM
1

I aim to please.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:04 PM
3

Short of putting your balls in a meat grinder its the best option you have. Even with failure the success rate is higher than condoms. You can also have periodic sperm counts done if you are worried.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:20 PM
1

Yours must be defective. If you send it back to the factory maybe they will install the mind control trays.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:14 PM
5

As a gun owner I understand where you are coming from. If all gun owners were as violent as a number of anti gun people think we are there wouldn't be any anti gun people left.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:23 PM
3

I'm sure one exists in the deepest darkest vaults of ABC, never to see the light of day.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:07 PM
2

Along with withdrawing mentally being really the only defense mechanism a baby has.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:04 PM
1

Depends, if you're a celebrity or incredibly rich you can probably get away with just being sad and apologetic and going to rehab.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:33 AM
7

Yeah but that is incredibly not normal or average.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:58 AM
1

Or at least in our own country
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:56 PM
2

So you want unemotional sociopaths, righto. Humans aren't robots who can turn emotions on and off at will.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:16 AM
1

So why exactly does US taxpayer money need to fund study of Brazilian anything?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:13 AM
6

Gotta keep that sweet sweet research money coming in somehow.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:50 AM
5

He would be a rapist in training.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:00 PM
1

And of course men are only interested in women for their baby making ability.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:45 PM
7

I'm not OP....
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:35 PM
1

Now we wait and see if the NYPD actually follows the court order.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:30 PM
9

Well it's rather hard to overlook it when it's an 11 year old kid.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:26 PM
1

They'll probably call it "hate speech"
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:14 PM
13

Do you have the money laying around to fight charges in court? Most people don't.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:11 PM
3

Send her a message,txt, etc saying that you do not want to have any contact with her in any way shape or form and that you will consider continued contact to be stalking and report it. Then DO NOT CONTACT HER EVER AGAIN. Do not argue with her, do not talk to her, do not interact in any way with her unless it is required by your work or something similar. Any contact you have with her after you tell her to leave you alone will be held against you. When she inevitably contacts you again after your…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:06 PM
4

Its so nice how proud you are of your skill at sexually assaulting people.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:43 AM
4

Unwanted touching is violence. Enjoy getting doused in OC
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:23 AM
2

Don't get mad, get motivated. What was done to your penis can't be undone really. There are some things you can do to help but you can't wave a wand and undo it. Getting angry isn't productive. What you can do is get motivated and get vocal. Talk to other mothers and fathers (and parents to be) talk to friends. Bring truth to darkness.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:01 PM
1

Failure to pay child support is usually a crime, not just a debt. A felony in some states.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:19 AM
-2

Unless you go to some third world shit hole they will still come after you
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:02 AM
2

The only anesthetic used in most vasectomies is a local like lidocaine, rather unlikely it would kill you.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:25 AM
0

TIL that Indian bus drivers are crazy.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:14 AM
1

Police are twos to protect people in general. Not any one specific person. If they were they could be sued when they failed to do so. The State does not want that to happen
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:52 AM
8

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia If you don't believe it read this
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:14 PM
1

That's downright horrifying.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:24 AM
4

I think they may have meant that if you dont work you will be tossed in jail, also if the court doesn't think you are working a high enough paying job in correlation with your skills/abilities your support will not be reduced.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:53 AM
0

Wow, brutal man.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:20 PM
6

I would say that the lack of violence in reaction to such incidents is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:46 AM
1

This would be the smart idea, family and smart rarely seem to go together.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:27 PM
1

Cold hard reality hits them like a brick wall.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:20 PM
2

I don't get upset about mine because getting angry about it won't change anything. But before our son was born I argued extensively with my wife about not having it done. It took a while for her to get the concept that chopping off a part of someone else's body without their consent is wrong regardless of how popular it is.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:53 PM
2

You honestly can't figure out how to wash your dick?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:49 PM
3

" Aaron Gouveia Aaron Gouveia Blogger, The Daddy Files GET UPDATES FROM Aaron Gouveia Like 39 It's Time to Stop Treating Dads Like Idiots Posted: 05/20/2013 4:41 pm Read more Sara Kety , Sara Kety Onesie , Dad-Stereotypes , Daddy Proof Onesie , Dads , Fatherhood , Making Fun Of Dads , Dads , Sexist Onesie , Stereotypes About Dads , Parents News 2,702 282 28 111 1070 Get Parents Newsletters: Subscribe The straw that broke the camel's back came in the form of a text message from my wife. This is w…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:43 PM
2

If the targets weren't Nazis your argument would be a bit better.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:38 PM
7

If anyone requires you to marry them to prove your love to them, run, run far far far away and never look back at the emotional manipulation you left behind.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 11:09 PM
10

I never knew having a penis required one to wear pants, or that lack of penis required a skirt. Learn something new every day.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 03:35 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/1dvnem/above_the_game_part_7_physical_escalation_sex/ See the physical escalation part AKA, how to get arrested for sexual assault 101.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter