TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

underskewer Archive

View 5 posts and 194 comments by underskewer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Do you find that women seem less interested in you when you tell them you are a scientist?
/r/TheRedPill01/03/13 10:43 PM
1

What do you say that makes them think you have such an intellect?
/r/TheRedPill01/03/13 09:43 PM
1

I just remembered And I thought that the mind actually does not suppress memories.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/13 01:00 AM
6

P.Z. Meyers is one of the members ridiculed most.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:16 PM
3

It is not possible for everyone to have half a billion bucks. For every woman with twenty nannies, there are twenty women working as a nanny. Gold.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/13 02:58 PM
4

From the title I thought this was about Hitch the film.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/13 04:15 PM
0

Et tu?
/r/TheRedPill20/02/13 10:26 PM
3

So are there pretty women elsewhere who don't act like this?
/r/TheRedPill20/02/13 08:25 PM
2

I appreciate the honesty people have here in this sub-reddit. Nowhere else have I seen people openly admit that they would dump a fat girl because of the shame associated with being seen with an ugly girlfriend.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/13 12:23 AM
2

How so?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:03 PM
3

Eric Pepke's answer is interesting. I can't see a way to link to it, so I'll quote it. Most of these answers are classic advertising. Some are crowd-pleasers. Many are perspicacious, and they tend to have fewer votes. But the OP said "don't feel limited by anything," so I won't. Realize that all of your emotions, no matter what they are or where they come from, will be interpreted as anger, and you will be treated as a threat. There is a classic study on this called Sex Differences: A Study in t…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/13 05:18 PM
2

Parenting by far has the highest effect on whether an individual will be "competitive" or not, and a person's competitiveness (as with any other trait) should be judged individually without referring to their gender. Sounds like you have a source for that claim. Where is it?
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:16 PM
2

Youtube has it's own automatic transcriber, but it is awful. Are you saying there are others that are good enough to be useful?
/r/TheRedPill16/02/13 05:27 PM
-1

I bet it was really a man who made the first rolling pin. How many women do woodwork?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:20 PM
0

Yes, and threatening to leave him is the way I would suggest you push him. But regardless of how you do it, he'll be doing it to please you. He'll change just enough to satisfy you for the now, but eventually you'll be disappointed when it becomes apparent that he hasn't changed all the way.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/13 10:49 PM
-4

It is very arrogant to try to change someone. You'll make him resent you. Better leave him.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/13 10:02 PM
4

Sociopath?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:43 AM
3

and even on LessWrong, character-based voting still happens Eliezer Yudkowsky.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:05 AM
16

Even Israel isn't egalitarian. Men have to serve 3 years while women serve just 2. See for yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_Israel
/r/MensRights06/02/13 12:55 AM
10

but keeps hitting on Hitchens non-stop to the point he has to tell her to stop Got links to this? If that's true, I'm not surprised given the kind of man Christopher Hitchens is.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:39 AM
1

What do you mean by "fruity guy"? It's entirely lost on me.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/13 06:09 PM
5

I find that the name "Men's Human Rights Movement" implies that men's human rights are being infringed somewhere. "Men's Rights Movement" sounds like a bunch of men just wanting more rights.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:45 AM
1

Same here. Someone please post a synopsis.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/13 01:46 AM
1

Didn't know they had a TV show. Powerpuff Girls was alright, though.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/13 07:26 PM
1

A lot of children's shows are pretty good.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/13 05:52 PM
1

That's a reason to keep reading. The phrase "intellectual homosexuality" is damn funny, at least out of context like it is in your comment.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:46 AM
2

That guy is awesome. Here's his blog: http://dapook.blogspot.co.uk/ It seems that with all his experience with women he has become disappointed with them. It hasn't been updated in years. I wonder what he is up to.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/13 03:47 AM
1

I don't understand. What reason is there to seek out a father-daughter relationship with another woman?
/r/TheRedPill04/01/13 03:52 AM
1

It's only about 150 pages too.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 03:51 AM
1

This clip is excellent: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=km6yaGS0leE
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:47 AM
1

Did you mean logical?
/r/MensRights27/12/12 12:48 AM
8

But don't forget about the response by some feminists to this research. Apparently, the methodology is not good enough because it counts hitting in self defence to be reciprocal domestic violence -- usually the people saying this are trying to imply that indeed most violence from women is self defence.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 02:29 AM
3

Reading through that first link, you'd think it was your duty as a man to act on these hints from women, or that it's impossible to just not be interested in her.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:58 AM
1

What about the mating strategies do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:04 PM
3

So women deliberately sabotage their attempts? Did they discuss why women might do that?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:47 PM
4

Hmm, I've also heard about single motherhood being correlated with being poor, and poor people committing more crime. How did they address that?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:41 PM
1

http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/20453655/Rebecca+Watson+rebecca.jpg Could be worse. http://gregladen.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Rebecca-Watson.jpg What's with the braids. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/Rebecca_Watson_80.jpg Woah there feminist! Are you trying to get me to objectify you? http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Ezt24UszRvM/T_eSyWHEA_I/AAAAAAAAF7Q/e39Ms6bJoTA/s1600/Rebecca+Watson.jpg Aaah! It's a feminist. (I feel I have sunk to a new low with this post, but what…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:40 PM
3

At risk of sounding misogynistic, Rebecca isn't attractive enough to assume attention from a man is sexual in nature, not by a long shot. Something is rather wrong when it is reasonable to assume that some people will call you misogynistic for saying something like that. What you say is just the truth, and it hardly has anything to do with gender anyway. You can say that a man can not assume attention from women, and no one will bat an eyelid.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 05:11 AM
1

Don't blame the dictionary makers. They merely present how a word is used. Blame the society they document, where the word 'sexism' is itself used in a sexist way.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:40 PM
1

The dictionary is explaining how the word is typically used, and the issue is that it is seldom used to refer to prejudice against men.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:04 PM
1

I know what you meant. I think the term usually used would be 'circular reasoning'. But this doesn't quite qualify as circular reasoning. All the dictionary is saying is that the word is usually used to refer to prejudice against women.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:32 PM
2

A 3D shape with one face?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:44 PM
1

Yes. In general, more boys are born, but they are more likely to die at any given age than women are. And then some journalists phrase this as "women are more likely to die lonely".
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:04 PM
1

What do you mean? I would consider a difference of 0.07 from 0.50 to be very large.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:53 PM
5

Saying 0.43 (or 43%, or 3/7) of graduates are men is the clearest way to say it for anyone comfortable with maths. It doesn't make as good linkbait, sadly, so journalists always make us have to think whenever we want to know what the real numbers are.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:42 PM
1

My baby pictures are on Facebook, so there's nothing I can do now. Damn Facebook intruding on my privacy.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:31 PM
1

Your parents must've been so annoyed at you.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:21 AM
3

According to Wikipedia, the birth ratio is 1.05 boys to girls. Someone should point out to her what that means when you consider that the sex ratio of those still living is lower. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:20 AM
0

That's not even misogyny. It the appreciation of women.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:54 PM
-2

Without knowing that, it looks like a bunch of bosses looking to here their next affair.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:43 PM
15

If they're hating on anyone, they're only hating on criminals. It's a lot harder to fault them for that, and it's not something you'd call them a hate group for. No one here has claimed that every women is a false rape fraudster.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:09 PM
47

I'm sorry us men at /r/MenRights made you feel uncomfortable. We men don't have to live with the constant fear of being e-raped by men on the internet. Bad me!
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:00 AM
1

US satellites? I thought it was just the USA and Canada that did it for non-religious reasons.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 04:11 AM
2

Esther Vilar, Erin Pizzey... you guys should compile a list for the sidebar.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:14 PM
4

I imagine if I, a man, did that, I would be shunned and blamed. You can ignore weeping women, therefore you have female privilege!
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:13 PM
1

You are scrutinizing the way men are affected by gender roles, in /r/MensRights. But I don't see it in /r/feminism. Have I merely missed them doing it?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:17 AM
1

True. But there a few people bashing MRAs on /r/feminism. And there is Manboobz. I still think it's fair to criticize feminists for ignoring men's issues. Feminists (really, all of them, or they're not feminists) always link their issues to some theory of patriarchy. Most theories of partiarchy imply some kind of sexism against men. So if they're fighting patriarchy, why not pay more attention to how it affects men? Fight each head of the hydra at once. MRAs, on the other hand, only claim to be …
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:03 PM
1

True, but this is /r/MensRights and not /r/feminism. Feminists, in general, seem to abolish gender roles by only fighting half the battle.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:31 AM
1

You can make outrageous claims, but only if you back them up.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:55 PM
7

How come there is just about no outrage from the sorts of feminists, like you, who focus on abolishing or at least changing gender roles?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:52 PM
1

Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:35 PM
3

Wow. Have you got citations for that?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:35 PM
1

In what countries would US libertarians be called liberals?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:06 PM
1

Things like this are petty. Question surveys don't tell you anything, but I see feminists using them all the time as evidence and it is really a discredit to women that the people who are supposed to be their champions prefer to use argument by shock. It justifies the trope that men are logical, and women are emotional.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:23 AM
3

The argument applies to any medication.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:50 PM
1

Anything could trigger it. It's not our responsibility to avoid it.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:16 AM
3

All Feminism is biased against men. That's a lofty statement.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:43 PM
0

Thanks for that. I love D.H. Lawrence. He has a bit of an attitude about women; here's another one by him: http://www.bachlund.org/To_Women_As_Far_As_I'm_Concerned.htm
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:36 PM
3

Who?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:10 PM
7

Who said they want all women to take on early 1900 roles?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:58 PM
-7

Pink flames.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:37 AM
2

That game is fun. My best score is 33. Has anyone got any better?
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:05 PM
6

The first article is what you might call empowering. I don't see an issue with articles like these, but it eventually gets a bit much. Where are the articles celebrating male nurses and single and stay-at-home fathers and receptionists?
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:00 PM
3

Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in the United States. So if this this test measures my sexism, what use is my belief about how sexist US society is? Hmm... perhaps the people who design this test think that if I think discrimination against women is no longer a problem anymore, that must be due to my sexism. That's politically motivated research for you.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:56 PM
2

It doesn't matter how often men get sexually assaulted. The issue is that the people who are supposed to help those who have been sexually assaulted, in general, target women only, and that many people can't even imagine that a man could be sexually assaulted by a woman. The lifetime stats are lower either because men are less likely to report having been raped over their lifetimes Yes, people need to acknowledge just how badly skewed these surveys are by bias. They're nowhere near being gospel …
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:49 AM
6

Are you saying that prostitution shouldn't happen because it's easy work for lazy people?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:19 PM
37

Could you also make the case that they were illegally conspiring to commit a crime?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:59 PM
2

I call it gender apartheid.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 04:38 PM
5

I suspect that NOW and the Fawcett Society know why the wage gap exists, but resent the economical rules that mean that women's behaviour cause them to earn less. They want to change society so that it doesn't matter, that they'll earn the same anyway regardless of them providing less value to the economy.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 11:07 PM
5

Only rich people can discuss the tax rates for rich people.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:03 PM
1

I have a gripe with this website: http://rapecrisis.org.uk/ This is a charity that helps people who have been sexually assaulted. The site is clearly targeted to women only. I think this is wrong. I do think that it is women who are more likely to be sexually assaulted, but I don't think that this justifies that. I think the site should be more gender neutral. Seeing as you've worked at a sexual assault center, what do you think?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 03:50 AM
4

That film is very, uh, backwards.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:19 PM
-3

You can't have sexism against men because men have all the privilege. But yeah, this is proof that the patriarchy hurts men too! Gender roles hurt men too, like expecting women to do all the part time work so that they get more experience and thus get paid more in their part time work. This is why men need more feminism. But let's not forget that women are more oppressed here. Women are not encouraged to take on more hours. /s
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:01 AM
3

Yeah, in the UK 'football' is what is called 'soccer' in the USA. In the UK, every man is expected to support some football team.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:49 AM
2

Is there anyone reasonable in gender studies?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:36 AM
2

The comments here are evidence of the issues male victims of sexual assault face. So many are along the lines of "If I was him, I would've loved it." Even the people who are supposed to help victims of sexual assault act like it doesn't happen to men. Remember that study that said that most people who tell professionals they were sexually assaulted by a woman are not believed at first? And look at the website for Rape Crisis! http://www.rapecrisis.org.uk/
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:48 PM
4

A few comments are saying this is supposed to be a 'gender role reversal'. Is this true, or are these just commenters who can't see that this sort of thing happens to men?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:39 PM
6

Landperson
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:58 AM
7

Even here women are being paid 70% of what men do.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:21 PM
1

Well, since less women are in US government than men, the votes of women who feminists hate, such as Phyllis Schlafly who blocked the Equal Rights Amendment, will count for a lot more.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:29 AM
3

How you see your argument: it's not that there is no legitimate reason to be pro-life. The problem with many pro-lifers is their need to impose their beliefs on others. If you think abortion is wrong, simply don't have one. However, I don't understand why pro-lifers think b/c they believe abortion is wrong no one should have one. Mind your own business. The woman accros the street, her husband, her children, whether she has an abortion is not your business. The way your opposition sees your argu…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:25 AM
3

http://www.gallup.com/poll/147734/americans-split-along-pro-choice-pro-life-lines.aspx This report says men and women have the same views on abortion. Still blows a rocket to the idea that men have different, maybe damaging views, on women's issues, and thus only women should vote on them.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:20 AM
12

And only the rich are allowed to vote on tax rates for the rich.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:12 AM
4

This is rather unclear. What were they fighting against, exactly?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 02:15 PM
2

How can education be improved for boys?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 03:05 PM
1

I would like to see statistics showing how much women get "bombarded by messages" from "rather unsavory characters".
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:18 AM
2

It's surprising that the numbers along the main diagonal are pretty random. I thought people were more attracted to those of the same race.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:15 AM
-1

What is it you think you're doing that we're not? The Mankind Initiative to help male victims of domestic violence. That was necessary because almost all the other DV shelters in the UK refuse to help men, or kick them out to make room for women when they run out of space. particularly in this country What country? Azerbaijan? I never knew every Reddit user lived in Azerbaijan. there is more discrimination against women than men Let's see some hard evidence that this is true in Western cultures.…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:01 AM
0

I'm going to assume you're advocating feminism. If feminists are against the effects of patriarchy in all its forms, why aren't they doing anything to combat this? If they believed that the patriarchy is always harmful, why don't they fight it in any way they can?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:11 AM
-19

Y'know, feminisation of education and all.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:07 AM
-1

A communist you say? Feminism is pseudo-Marxism. I've wondered for a little while if feminist theory was directly inspired by Marxism, or if the surface similarities are just a coincidence. Capitalism: a society that oppresses the proletariat while lending privilege to the bourgeoisie. Patriarchy: a society that oppresses women while lending privilege to the men.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 08:36 PM
2

I meant that you do not hate men, as evidenced by you regularly posting to /r/MensRights. I'm saying that women who are victims of sexual assault are more likely to find things like the theory of 'rape culture' credible. If you were to write to this publication, then we would know that they have someone writing to them who's still sensible.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:46 PM
2

Have I offended you somehow?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:19 PM
3

A submission from a woman who hasn't been turned into a man-hater because of her experiences, who is still sympathetic to the rest of men who are not rapists, would be helpful.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:50 PM
2

With widespread availability of effective birth control for women (men only get condoms), to how many women is abortion actually a serious issue? What I take to mean "the cultural dominance of feminism" is what anyone can plainly see. Women and girls are always being told that they are disadvantaged just because they are women, that men have it better. They're told that their hard work is routinely under-appreciated, that they routinely are ignored over men, and that they routinely are valued on…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:46 PM
26

It doesn't even matter how often it happens. It's the principle that matters. People who destroy lives should be punished.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:48 PM
4

Some feminists are just grasping at straws to show that women are oppressed. Did you see that article where some (British, I think) politician was trying to show how recessions affect women more?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:43 PM
2

Is this actually worth reading? It's written by feminist triumphalist Hanna Rosin.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:16 PM
20

She won't even need to work overtime because she's doing it better than the boys anyway!
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:10 PM
3

I'll just pull out some of the juicy bits I can find that should entice you to read the whole thing. Methods Used to Conceal and Distort Evidence on Symmetry in Partner Violence Suppress Evidence Avoid Obtaining Data Inconsistent with the Patriarchal Dominance Theory Cite Only Studies That Show Male Perpetration Conclude That Results Support Feminist Beliefs When They Do Not Create "Evidence" by Citation Obstrnct Publication of Articles and Obstruct Funding Research That Might Contradict the Ide…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:08 PM
1

Have your honeymoon in Scotland and you can visit all the distilleries :D
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:04 PM
10

Even if the first guy is the father, why should he pay if his say in how the child should be getting raised is chucked in the dustbin? I get that the woman should get to choose whether she stays with the first guy or not, but having the child anyway is irresponsible. Is there no deterrent to this kind of behaviour? Is a deterrent possible while still keeping society fair. Sometimes parents end up single and there is nothing that can be done about that, such as when one of the parents died. Widow…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:00 PM
3

and a bottle of cask strength whiskey Dayum girl. Cask whisky is amazing.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:30 PM
13

Theft culture: women manipulate men to get their money, and this behaviour is sanctioned by their girlfriends. So we call the guys rapists, and the girls thiefs. Or gold-diggers, if you prefer.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:27 PM
6

I posted this to /r/Feminism http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/z12uz/the_powerpuff_girls_on_the_suffragettes_xpost/
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:38 PM
5

Some feminists are still hammering that idea in, but all the studies I've heard about looking into it show no harmful effects to relationships.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:22 AM
4

What you’re asking for is for your post-courtship relationship to be even-steven, even though before and during courtship you were perfectly happy to enjoy the benefits of a wildly imbalanced relationship where the man took on all the risks of overt rejection, and where your standards had nothing to do with finding a man with egalitarian values. Instead you chose one who embodied the dominant, high-on-the-social-hierarchy, patriarchal values that you now chafe against. If you ask women to go for…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:07 AM
8

It sounds trite but it's true. Scientists risk their careers if they go against the feminist party line. They've had to falsify data in order to not get harassed. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:25 AM
4

To the sidebar, you!
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:48 PM
1

Have you asked the mods why they deleted this? If you're posting this here, you're preaching to the choir. This is a political issue and more people need to be aware of it. You'll find that there is plenty of advocacy on behalf of women's issues, which is great, but very little for men's issues. Campaigns to stop violence against women are an example. Men in every country experience much more violence than women, even in Western countries. Domestic violence is slightly different from other kinds…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:25 PM
2

Well they did do something for you. They changed their grand theory from patriarchy, which only oppresses women, to kyriarchy, which also oppresses homosexuals. And then they continued fighting women's issues to the exclusion of all else.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:54 AM
2

I can't give you any advice, but I'm going to assume that everything you are saying is true unless it is proven otherwise. Advice written here could be useful to other people who are trying to gain custody for their children. I couldn't care less if it is used against the MRM. This is not the press release page of some organisation.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:57 PM
1

The USA isn't the only country. An English-Welsh government report shows 0.5% of men and 2.5% of women experiencing sexual assault in the 12 months before the report. The figures for 'serious' sexual assault are 0.1% and 0.6%. The report is rather vague on definitions, but I'm sure 'serious' sexual assault would include both male-to-female and female-to-male rape.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:38 PM
1

And even within primates there is much variety. Isn't there one primate which has testicles much larger relative to their bodies than ours, since they tend to take on several sexual partners?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:44 AM
2

Yeah. Compare this to the "It's my body!" rhetoric in the abortion debate. If they applied that same argument here, they'd be supporting us.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:08 PM
0

Nah. It needs to be done on the baby's eighth day of life. God says so. If you don't, He will come to kill you, as he did to Moses who chose not to circumcise his firstborn straight away. Luckily his wife did the deed just before God could do any damage. Or perhaps you are part of a conspiracy to give God the final excuse to unleash his vengeance on the Jews for crucifying his only and beloved son. You know, cos when Jews can't circumcise their babies, God will come and kill them.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:49 PM
3

Rape in the UK is defined such that only those with penises can commit it. It's better look at sexual assault in general rather than this one facet of it. According to a Scottish report, the incidences of 'serious' sexual assault are 0% and 1% for men and women respectively (these figures are shown to no better accuracy). This is in slight disfavour of women, but not significantly so and these crimes are still quite rare. This isn't the women's issue they paint it to be. Also, the lady who was i…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:13 PM
4

Well, you know how the most fervent homophobes are always gay themselves.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:31 AM
4

Nah. Obviously the only reason they're writing about this is because this is one of the major points of the MRM. It shows a kind of desperation.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:41 AM
-11

No, this is feminists and MRAs finally working together on the issue of male circumcision.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:35 AM
4

Though religious explanations bear little meaning to you or myself, this is the chapter of Genesis in question: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+17&version=NIV In order for an Israelite man to fulfil his covenant with God, he must be circumcised.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:08 AM
0

This article marks a historic event: The first time feminists have cared about men's issues.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:32 AM
2

I'm curious what sort of background you have where this experience is new to you. In my experience, most people aren't much interested in discussing things that don't directly affect themselves. By their own words, they say that when chatting with their mates they just want to relax and unwind. Personally, I find it hard to relax when I don't get to discuss social issues, mostly out of a need for validation for whatever I'm thinking.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:20 AM
3

Seems that what is biased would depend on your point of view.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:15 AM
5

Thanks for that. I read the whole article confused at how the OP's title related to the article. That's the only mention of this rather vital detail. Perhaps the writer did this deliberately for some reason?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:29 AM
2

I remember someone saying that story was misogynistic because it portrayed women coercing men to commit crime.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:59 PM
2

Here's a better example. http://www.mencanstoprape.org/images/stories/Images__Logos/Strength_Media/BI4.jpg
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:50 PM
1

The report does make some related points. It shows that 67% of women and 20% of men who have been domestically abused by the reports definition would call themselves victims. Have you got a link for that?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:51 PM
1

I've heard of these dastardly people called Gender Studies Professors, who kidnap sweet innocent women and indoctrinate them in their evil misandric ways. And when they release them, all that is left is an abomination of their former selves: a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:37 AM
1

I was wondering about that statistic too. Are you saying that woman are raping much more than they used to? Are you saying that in the past, the huge majority of rapists were men?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:32 AM
2

It's hard to take "formal training in feminism" seriously, with all the statistical incompetence and academic dishonesty going about in that field. But yes, I do agree that someone who's studied it for years is in a better position to denounce it.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:02 AM
1

I think you've misunderstood me: In the prevalence since 16 years, women report more than men. In the incidence over 12 months, men report more than women.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:56 AM
23

Yeah. I suppose if they banned the show, the same sorts of parents will go on abusing their kids.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:45 AM
6

Just enough that you should be suspicious of your wife. Sad.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:42 AM
2

That could be it. Don't women initiate divorce more than men? That would suggest that women are more willing to end relationships in general.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:28 AM
2

Haha, I didn't realise how bad that sounded when I posted that. I meant more as gatekeepers to all sex.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:01 AM
3

Do you think that mainstream media portrays this they same way you've seen it? Also, even though I often see women going after men, only men seem to get 'congratulated' when they get attention from women. Dissymmetries like could give the impression that only men chase women, therefore women get loads of attention, therefore women act as gatekeepers to their vagina.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:36 PM
5

For those who doubt this person's claims: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_regarding_rape#United_Kingdom
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:21 PM
2

Yeah, my cousin was put in hospital after an accident in a linear algebra course.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 02:04 PM
4

Do a lot of bisexual men prefer dating men?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:18 AM
1

You think they, uh, use flawed studies on purpose?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:49 AM
19

If you're asking for legal advice, you should tell us what country you're in.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:57 PM
10

Who's downvoting the poor robot?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:56 PM
1

I feel sorry for you USians having to deal with Obama's pandering to feminists. Remember when he said that women being the significant majority in higher education was some great accomplishment of the USA?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:37 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/y9kml/hey_women_apparently_antifeminist_groups_in_the/c5trebj http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/y9kml/hey_women_apparently_antifeminist_groups_in_the/c5ttfbx This user, ughsuchbullshit, maybe does not understand reason. What do you think?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:32 AM
2

It is reasonably well known. A few of the teachers at my school participated last November.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:01 AM
3

"I mean we have a breast cancer MONTH but not even a prostate cancer DAY or testicular cancer day." Check out http://uk.movember.com/about/ At least in the UK we have a prostate cancer awareness month :) Edit: just noticed HeWasAQuietMan already mentioned this.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:39 AM
9

Let me guess. You posted on /r/feminism?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:24 AM
2

We can turn this I'm-a-victim-so-I-have-authority-ing onto them. "As a man who has been discriminated against before I still to this day have never had someone stand up for me. Maybe people should grow up and act like adults and stop worrying about something that's not going to happen instead of whining like a baby."
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:20 AM
2

If a man is attacked by a group of thugs, he's equally likely as a woman to be overpowered.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:25 PM
2

I can't back this up, but I think that most violent assault on the streets would be by groups of thugs.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:03 PM
11

They mean women feel more at risk than men do. girlwriteswhat mentioned a study demonstrating this in an interview with her.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:49 AM
0

How was marriage ever about controlling women?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:33 PM
10

Oh wait. I misread that as "the greatest pleasure I have ever felt was having my tongue between my dick and foreskin."
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:21 AM
8

This video explains the issue quite well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ When FGM was banned, almost all kinds of FGM were banned, even those less intrusive than typical foreskin circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:16 AM
7

You must be extremely flexible.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:13 AM
19

How did the idea of 'objectification' get so corrupted? We 'objectify' people every day, and it's not a bad thing. When you get a drink at your local cafe, you don't care about the personality of the barista who's serving you. Your only concern is getting your drink. This is 'objectifying'. Why do feminist blogs keep going on and on about it as if it's something inherently bad?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:07 AM
2

By coincidence, I found some coverage on it from one of our favourite impartial sources: http://jezebel.com/5899056/punching-sperm+stealing-women-totally-okay-with-mens-rights-activists
/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:14 AM
4

Yes. We shouldn't turn the MRM into another Feminazi Speech and Humour Police.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:40 PM
1

Got a link to that?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:17 PM
2

That link is surprisingly reasonable.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 02:21 PM
1

As for rape, they don't ask 'have you been raped?' but rather ask whether you've been in some specific situations. Then they use their definition of rape to find out how many people have been raped from this data. As we all know, the feminist definitions of rape are quite different from your average person's.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:33 PM
2

Was that survey based on what people said of their own sexuality?
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:29 PM
3

I think the word for that is 'projection'.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:25 PM
-5

How is the foreskin beneficial? I thought it did nothing.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:10 PM
6

Ok, a quick look at my DV bible (http://csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm). Ctrl-f for 'Britain' or 'United Kingdom'. All three citations show women are worse perpetrators of DV than men. So at least half that claim seems to be made up. But does anyone have any citations about sexual violence?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 10:09 PM
2

"Furthermore, considering that women are far more likely to be lone parents and the victims of domestic and sexual violence" Is this at all true in the UK, or did the writer just pull this from their ass?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 10:04 PM
1

I have no idea what you are trying to allude to.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 10:28 PM
4

I think he's just going with the status quo to avoid losing support.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:01 PM
9

It's a good example of a privilege that women seem to have. They can have a man ostracized, just because they make them feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 07:03 PM
0

I see what you're saying, and maybe people should be punished for it. But I think it would be better to just teach people to handle these situations better. Also, from your first paragraph, it sounds like you're hardly hurt by this. The word rape should be reserved for crimes where the victim is hurt and humiliated.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:52 PM
2

I remember seeing so much 'benevolent sexism' in primary school. Girls were good and pure, and boys were troublemakers according to a fair few of the (female) teachers. I suppose one of the reasons boys are so often troublemakers is simply that the teachers expect them to be. Or perhaps their perceptions are skewed due to confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:46 AM
2

Yeah, I don't get this thing about coercive rape. If a women is being pressured into sex, they can always say no. If the man persists, they can call the police and say they are being harassed. If the women gives in, I don't see why she should be allowed to prosecute the man. Of course, when the man uses force, that is rape and should be punished. And when I use the terms man and woman above, I'm just humouring the standard narrative of rape.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:55 AM
1

Looks like a testicle, I suppose.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:20 AM
1

Do feminists actually fight against changing this?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:58 AM
6

It's not quite as sexist as the title makes it sound. From the article: More than 90 percent of Japanese couples were reported as wanting girls, as most said they already had at least two boys.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:01 PM
1

Considering the disparity in both are the largest since records began (including back when women were all 'oppressed' n stuff), Interesting. Got some citations?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:35 PM
4

Only the part that infringes on the right of self-autonomy of baby boys, and nothing else.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:27 PM
1

That first article is excellent and well reasoned. How come it hasn't caught more attention?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:28 AM
3

I see that, but that could be a bias in the people who hand them out and not a problem with ASBOs.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:41 AM
3

How are they misandrist?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:13 AM
1

I agree that there is a double standard here. I'm saying that maybe a 24 year old man having sex with a 15 year old girl isn't so bad, and that maybe a 24 year old woman having sex with a 15 year old boy isn't so bad. Or maybe they are both bad, like the law has it. I'm trying to point out that no one is discussing this --- at least I haven't seen it. And someone who pisses in public ought to get an ASBO, or equivalent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Social_Behaviour_Order
/r/MensRights08/07/12 01:40 AM
3

There is a possibility that whenever a child under the age of 16 has sex, that they will be somehow damaged by it. At least, I assume this was the reasoning behind the age of consent. It seems that people think the age of consent is too high, but just don't realize they think that. Everyone can imagine a 15 year old who would be glad to receive the kind of attention this boy did-- and this feels ok to them --but what about a 14 year old, or a 13 year old or an 11 year old? At what age does it to…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:26 AM
3

How come all your comments are getting downvoted so much?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter