TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

unicornshoes Archive

View 1 posts and 43 comments by unicornshoes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
25

unicornshoes/r/MensRights20/05/10 01:28 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are we talking about homeless shelters? Or domestic violence shelters? Because in general there are a lot more male-only homeless shelters than female shelters. (As I’m sure you know...men are more likely to be homeless) And I like said, domestic violence programs that take in federal/state money have to offer services (including shelter) to both men and women victims. So in reality, the services are available. The barrier that needs to be broken is the illusion that there is no help for men exp…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:00 PM
1

Lol it’s definitely not zero. Most DV shelters are either gender neutral or will at least put male DV victims in hotels etc if needed. I work in the field of DV. We serve anyone, no matter their gender.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:38 AM
1

Which is kinda odd to me, since condoms might be cheaper and protect against stuff other than pregnancy, so you'd think the government would be on board with it. BC is a medication that can help cure other women ailments other then just "not getting pregnant." For example, some women use it to lighten up extremely heavy periods (we're talking soaking through a jumbo tampon in less than 10 mins or having a period last for 9-10 days etc), to help with PMS/PMDD, bad acne, I think maybe PCOS and I'm…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 03:12 AM
5

Yes, women are completely capable of lying about rape. Any human being is capable of lying about anything. What I want to point out is that lying about rape in order to simply have a legal abortion is different than the reasons listed in the past paragraph. Okay, hear me out guys. And keep in mind I believe lying about rape is never right. The only reason a woman, in a case like this, would be lying is because she can't have a legal abortion without doing so. Had she be allowed to have a legal a…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:12 PM
10

Magazines like Cosmo are awful for more than a few reasons. They cost about 5+ dollars. And 3/4 of it is just advertisements. It's like paying to watch commercials, or read billboards. These magazines, well the products they advertise in articles like "Make the pores on your face disappear using X, Y, AND Z product (and including the actual ads found within) completely play off a woman's self-esteem. You face is too shiny. You're too fat. Your hair isn't soft enough. Your lips aren't glossed eno…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:53 PM
11

Anyone can be raped by anyone. Fact. Rape does not discriminate against either sex. And anyone who legitimately thinks a person cannot be raped because of their sex is probably an idiot, to be blunt. I attended a "Take Back the Night" event at my college last year. One of the components of the evening was an open floor where people, anyone, could stand in front of the audience and share their story. Talk about cutting onions. There were women who told of being raped by men. There were women who …
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:22 PM
3

Yes. It's unfair that women are the only ones who can choose what happens to their body. Women got biologically stuck with the baby oven, you can't change that, it's how it will always be. Unfortunately it's the sad truth, if a woman wants an abortion, she can have one without so much as even telling the father any information about the situation. Because of biology, a man's choice comes before he chooses to have sex. Yep, it's unfair. But until legislation changes it so a man can choose a "male…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 09:02 PM
8

My question is, does your brother really want to sever ties with this child permanently? I'm pretty sure if he's legally separated he doesn't get visitation rights or custody of any sort (I'm not sure, just guessing). I mean, this isn't a decision he should take lightly is what I'm saying. I know the timing is wrong and it was unplanned but it's still his baby. A little piece of him, so to speak, that won't go away just because he doesn't have to associate with him/her. He'll always be a father,…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 08:49 PM
3

They should be told of the harm to the innocent young men false accusers lie about Fixed. Your original word choice was calling all the girls in the program liars. Assuming all women will falsely accuse men is no better than assuming all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 07:08 PM
2

Those women should totally be held accountable for their actions. I thought this study may be relevant though: Milgram Experiment The Milgram experiment on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 12:14 AM
4

Yeah, r/mensrights tends to say 2X is filled with man haters. I frequent it a bit and really see no such thing and if misandry finds its way there it is down voted swiftly anyways. Don't frequent r/feminisms much at all. Can't really say.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 11:50 PM
3

What? How can you want equality for men when you're willing to take away a child from his mother, one of two people who gave him life? Isn't that the same as not allowing a father to be in the picture?
/r/MensRights02/03/11 11:33 PM
3

The only time I hear or have ever heard someone say "All men are inherently evil/horrible/what have you," is when I hear a man say, "Everyone assumes all men are inherently evil/horrible/whatever."
/r/MensRights02/03/11 11:29 PM
2

Funny, my life experience shows just the opposite. You shouldn't make sweeping generalizations based on the opinions of the people you've talked to or your "life experiences" without some actual data to back it up.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 01:14 AM
2

The problem is that very often "child support" money goes to improve the lifestyle of the mother. Citation needed. How do you know a woman's using her child support money to get her nails done (example given in a comment below)? She could easily have bought groceries, paid bills so the kid has a home with water and electricity, bought the kid new sneakers and clothes and then when she knew her kid was all set with everything she used her own money to treat herself to a manicure. Or are woman who…
/r/MensRights01/03/11 03:48 PM
6

It is time to renew our national pledge, from the President and Congress on down to City Councils all across the nation** to END violence against women and men, girls and boys**. This effort must also be carried on in workplaces, schools, churches, locker rooms, the military, and in courtrooms, law enforcement, entertainment and the media. NOW pledges to continue our work to end this violence and we hope you will join us in our work. Sounds like a good idea. Stop violence against everyone.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 03:32 PM
3

This may sound bleak but when it comes down to a matter of life and death, I don't think anyone should be forced to fight over a piece of land that has no meaning other than the one others place upon it. You only get one life and I don't want to die for my country. And I don't think that makes me or anyone else who feels that way a bad person. Anyways, I'm a woman so I guess the draft doesn't pertain to me but my opinion still holds. The draft needs to be written off as something that happened i…
/r/MensRights23/02/11 06:20 AM
1

Okay, that makes more sense.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 10:05 PM
5

Okay, I can understand being upset with Hillary Clinton. But, that is what Clinton said, Logan didn't say anything of the like...unless I'm missing something? So what is the point of this: She has a history of calling attention to her own considerable sexuality. In the Afghanistan war, she was accused of showing off her body in a deliberate attempt to call attention to herself -- not difficult in a cauldron where thousands of hot-blooded young males had been away from wives and girlfriends for m…
/r/MensRights22/02/11 08:51 PM
1

leaves me to believe that I and you and others here are further an outlier on the human parabola of modern western socialization and cognition. that's just what I was thinking except I couldn't think of how to word it right. I just wonder, how can this be? How can people just completely miss things like this that are so blunt and obvious and in their face? Like really? le sigh
/r/MensRights08/02/11 08:47 PM
2

Yes. I think you definitely have to pick and choose your battles. And this commercial is definitely in bad taste and very sexist. I think what I find most upsetting is the fact that I'm sure plenty of people actually found this commercial to be genuinely funny. That's sort of frightening.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 08:23 PM
0

No, I understand the sexism in the commercial. It's like that whole deal on MTV where it was okay to show the teen mom beating her boyfriend's ass but Snookie gets knocked out by a dude and they can't even air it. Awful. I guess what I was saying is that it is totally possible to find a bit of sexism (whether it be against men or women) in most commercials, in some form or another. It's just the media reinforcing the gender norms that most of our society blindly follow.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 07:56 PM
-2

You're right, we shouldn't condone sexist ads like this or any sexist ads for that matter-whether it be misogyny or misandry. Which means all the ads involving the exploitation of scantily clad, gorgeous females using their body to pretty much sell a product etc etc should also go. right?
/r/MensRights08/02/11 05:04 PM
1

To be honest I hadn't heard of NOW prior to this post so my comments were just based on the article. And it is worth noting that the article specifically mentions creating more jobs for women in the areas of 'teaching, nursing and social work'. After re-reading it I did catch this. So basically the article is implying this sentiment, "Until we get more women in the science/math fields we need to create more jobs for them in the fields they already dominate." Uh. What?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 08:44 PM
1

Men and women are different. We are not androgynous and seeking parity is necessarily sexist. I don't think encouraging girls to become interested in science and math nor encouraging boys to be open minded about traditionally feminine jobs is sexist. Why should a person's goals in life be limited to what there biology is inclined to want? It shouldn't. And society shouldn't encourage it. If we stopped blaming society - and by that, feminists mean the evil men who comprise the "patriarchy" - we'd…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 08:35 PM
3

It's not that they are actively thinking "women are inferior" it is that they are conditioned by society that becoming a nurse isn't masculine and thus they are not really encouraged by society to become a nurse for that reason. Ever see the movie Meet The Parents? Ben Stiller's character was a male nurse and it was a running gag through out the whole movie. The film used the popular belief that nursing is a feminine job and is thus emasculating for a male to be a nurse as one big joke. It's the…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 05:09 PM
2

NOW = National Organization for Women. Of course their focus is going to be primarily on women because that's the whole purpose of the organization. Just because the reverse (encouraging men to go into fields dominated by women) wasn't mentioned doesn't mean that NOW believes it doesn't need combating and it's just "fine." It's just not the focus of the organization. It's like if someone posted an article, from a MRA group, about male circumcision being an atrocity and then someone commented say…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 04:59 PM
5

Worthy objectives -- but currently these fields are dominated by men. Much work remains to be done to bring women into parity in these vocations, known as STEM (science, technology, engineering and math). I didn't see anything about "taking jobs from men and giving them to women with government support." Please point it out to me.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 06:01 AM
6

I remember last semester, one of the new, young cops who works on my campus talked in one of my classes about how he was abused by his female, teenage babysitter as a child. It really makes you leery on who you should trust to watch your children.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 11:52 PM
1

About 3% of American men – a total of 2.78 million men – have experienced a rape at some point in their lifetime (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2006). In 2003, one in every ten rape victims was male. While there are no reliable annual surveys of sexual assaults on children, the Justice Department has estimated that one of six victims are under age 12 (National Crime Victimization Study, 2003). 71% of male victims were first raped before their 18th birthday; 16.6% were 18-24 years old, and 12.3% were 25 or …
/r/MensRights12/07/10 11:17 PM
2

Sorry, I was really tired when I made that comment. I didn't see it in a "cajoling" way, I was thinking of it in a threatening way like, "If you don't have sex with me, I won't take your sick mother to the doctor's," etc etc. Thanks for clairfying.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 04:42 PM
-1

"I'll take your mother to the doctors tomorrow if you make love to me tonight," and that is not rape. explain how this is not forcing an unwilling partner into having sex, please.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 01:25 PM
6

Yes, you're right. They are targeting male rape that occurs with a male offender because, simply, that is the most common form of male rape (according to reports. who knows the number of male rapes with female offenders that go unreported). However, as I presented, they do address female offenders, so they are "aware" that females can be offenders too.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 01:17 PM
9

Directly from the link: Victims or offenders can be male or female, child or adult. Males can be raped by having the following sexual acts forced on them, or be forced to perform these acts on the offender: penetration of penis into anus; fellatio (mouth to penis); penetration to any extent with an object into the anus; forced to perform cunnilingus (mouth to female genital area); or sexual intercourse (penis to vagina) on a female offender. I think they are aware that women can be offenders too…
/r/MensRights12/07/10 07:33 AM
-1

I thought Lady Gaga was a man.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 12:15 AM
1

Oh. So, since it is a "legal contract" if it's broken, it's a legal matter? So then what you're saying is in this case the woman was justified for taking her ex to court because it was a "legal contract" that he broke?
/r/MensRights18/05/10 08:17 PM
1

Oh. That kind of just sounds like a relationship issue though. I mean since they weren't married, their break up didn't involve going through any legalities.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 05:25 PM
18

What does this have to do with men's rights? Confused.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 01:01 AM
12

Only in the last sentence does the writer, and only the writer, make a comment about having a problem with it, "It's hard to imagine women handing that responsibility over to a man, who might forget to take his Pill or change his patch. Shudder." That's one woman's opinion. Your title is misleading.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 04:45 AM
1

I upvoted you for your fact.
/r/MensRights15/05/10 02:59 AM
1

Something like? Please provide a source.
/r/MensRights15/05/10 12:42 AM
0

You're partially right. But, there is more to it then what you said. Discrimination does account for some of the wage the gap. http://money.cnn.com/2006/02/21/commentary/everyday/sahadi/
/r/MensRights14/05/10 08:17 PM
0

I wonder how his "former" daughter feels.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 04:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter