TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

unmisunderestimated Archive

View 0 posts and 55 comments by unmisunderestimated on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

So their defense is the screening wasn't discriminatory, they just advertised that is was going to be (but it totally wouldn't have been had any men bought tickets)? Yeah, forgive me if I don't believe that.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:49 PM
–

Some nonsense about having no foreskin would help prevent STD's was spread (hehehe) in the US and its stuck around ever since. That's certainly the current rationale for keeping rates high but it goes back much further. In the late 1800's, there was a movement to circumcise boys as a way to decrease sexual pleasure and reduce masturbation. Fun fact, people also believed that bland foods would reduce sexual desire so it led to the creation of Corn Flakes and Graham crackers. Dr. John Kellogg's (y…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:50 AM
–

In my experience, they tend to use it as a comparative coping mechanism. They look at the people they're treating and compare themselves so they feel better about it. It also helps to normalize it for them; outside of the field, you or I maybe know a couple people with eating disorders but a psychologist might see a dozen or more per week. Compared to that population, their own internal struggles seem a lot more common.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:45 PM
–

Touched a nerve, huh? There's a phrase you'll probably be hearing a lot: research is mesearch.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 07:34 PM
–

I know more than a few psychologists, at least half at the grad school level are in it because of their own psychological issues.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 06:39 PM
–

Tangentially related bit of info: in many states, they won't tell you a child you fathered is being put up for adoption unless you inform the state what women you have sex with. It's called the putative father's registry.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:19 AM
–

I think the outsize celebrations for women's success continues an unconscious bias that women are less capable. It becomes something special with undertones of we shouldn't have expected a woman to do well.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 04:43 PM
5

Only if there is a child. These registries are supposed to include all intercourse by unmarried men.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 12:02 AM
–

You know, I bet we could get the registries a lot of negative press if we sold it as "government tracking women's sexual history!"
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:46 PM
8

For people on mobile who don't want to open a PDF. Op linked the report in the comments.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 10:26 PM
2

https://www.healthcare.gov/coverage/birth-control-benefits/ As long as the plan meets ACA requirements (which almost all do), you're covered. No copay, no deductible. This includes employer sponsored plans too.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:48 AM
1

I thought it was funny that Immorten Joe had done a much better job creating life than the "earth mother" with her bag of seeds.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:58 AM
–

She posted in male-centered subs too, asking how to convince him to get one. It's a topic that comes up occasionally on childfree too but most there agree that whoever doesn't want kids most has to be willing to get spayed. I find it a bit amusing now that it's actually cheaper for American women to get sterilized than men because the ACA requires all FDA-approved forms of female birth control to be covered at no cost.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:41 AM
1

every single single type of women's birth control that exists. Not quite. It must be FDA approved.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 04:26 AM
1

Would it be minimum wage, average earnings for a career (assuming they both have jobs before marriage), take into account possible promotions (who gets to do performance reviews)?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:08 PM
1

And if the couple decided she should stay at home and raise the kids instead of working?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:46 PM
1

Do you know of a better way to do it?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:13 PM
2

$995M is her portion of the couple's income earned (both salaries and increase of value of the company directly due to his role as CEO) during their marriage. She filed for divorce because of his infidelity. Interestingly enough, they've each filed for divorce once before (1998 & 2005) but dropped it both times.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:41 PM
–

But this isn't alimony. It's marital property distribution.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:34 PM
–

Most of the people here are spouting off that she's a gold-digger and that $1b is too much. I'm just trying to figure out what these people think a reasonable divorce settlement for this very wealthy couple should be.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:08 PM
–

Ignoring the fact that she was also an executive at Continental and has a law degree, I'm curious to know what you think a spouse should get if a marriage ends in divorce.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:02 PM
3

That's not what the article states.. His 68% share of the company is worth $14b. He has not sold it and is not required to sell it.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:47 PM
–

I'm curious. In your opinion, what would have been a fair settlement for the dissolution of this marriage?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:30 PM
–

He's been in the oil business since the the 60's but I'd guess that most of the value of the company is due to the rapid rise of oil prices in the early 2000's and the fortuitous investment in North Dakota oil fields 10 years prior.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:28 PM
–

He founded the company before the marriage and most of arguments in this trial were about how much value he as CEO brought and how much value can be attributed to passive factors. Without reading the ruling, I'd guess that they gave his contributions since 1988 a value of ~$2b and awarded her half.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:17 PM
–

Also NAL but I think this is mostly because he founded the company prior to the marriage. So he brought some significant property into the marriage that likely would have increased in value due to rising oil prices and that would have been excluded from marital property distribution if he wasn't the CEO.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:11 PM
–

This isn't alimony, it's a divorce settlement for the couple's assets acquired during their 26 year marriage.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:01 PM
13

Wrong meme. You need dating site murderer.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:52 PM
6

Why is it impossible for women to move up in male dominated fields but but not for men to move up in female dominated fields?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:31 AM
3

Harder is the wrong word to use here. Better compensated, definitely.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:27 AM
4

She's reaching with her central conclusion: that only men would rather work than stay home to care for children. From the same source, 37% of working mothers prefer to work full time and 22% of non-working mothers would prefer to work full time. Sounds to me that many fathers and mothers share similar opinions on work & family but women feel staying home is permanent while men view it as temporary.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:00 AM
–

Sexist doctors who believe men get vasectomies for consequence-free cheating. Or doctors who think men must defer to women about children in a relationship.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:51 PM
–

This topic comes up occasionally on /r/childfree. Some people have reported being required to have the wife sign a consent form but it doesn't seem to be all that widespread.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:37 PM
–

They also removed the Anti-Defamation League (fights anti-Semitism). I think they just took down all 3rd party (non-Federal) resources.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:26 PM
21

Although we can argue that women shouldn’t get drunk and convey mixed signals (try dissecting that the next day), they are functionally less able to resist the advances of a determined male. Gah. I know Parker has done some good things but that conservative idea that women don't desire sex is bad for men's rights and women's rights.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:23 PM
2

That must be an episode I haven't seen yet. All I've seen is her husband pushing her to hang out with the rich bitches and then owing money to them for the breast implants.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:33 PM
–

I've started watching it but ugh, the back stories for all the prisoners are like a feminist documentary. They make is seem like the only prisoner who is actually in there due to her own actions is the transvestite (who used to be a man). Everyone else only did those awful things because a man put them up to it.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:40 AM
–

Also, this is the Dane County Jail. Not a prison. So the population is people incarcerated for less that a year or even people on work release.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:28 AM
5

Any jail I've seen keeps the men and women strictly separated. So the men's wing and the women's ring probably have their own gyms. edit: You may have a good point since there's a women's yoga class on Saturday and the men aren't given gym time on Saturday.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:59 AM
–

Larsh told me that space and gym availability, where the classes are held, is the main reason. The gym is open from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Monday through Friday. During those times, a schedule is in place for inmates to exercise, Larsh said. It sounds like the other activities are already using the gym. So in order to start yoga for the men, they'd have to drop something else.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:35 AM
3

Because the bill is only written to benefit one guy who gave a bunch of money to the Kleefisch's.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:26 AM
–

It's a bit of a controversy in Wisconsin since the bill is being written and introduced as a favor to a wealthy campaign donor.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:24 AM
1

Could be. The "not because mothers are less committed" still seems to conflict with the finding that mothers are more likely to reduce hours of take time off.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:58 PM
44

Mothers suffer a wage penalty of about 5 percent per child — and not because mothers work fewer hours or are less committed employees Then later: Mothers are more likely to reduce their hours or take time off from work to care for a child or family member. Which is it?
/r/MensRights07/01/14 06:29 PM
3

Male teachers gave female students the same marks as the external examiners but the male teachers gave male student higher marks than the external examiners. So one could interpret that to mean that male teachers favored male students.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 11:57 PM
1

I thought it was interesting that she assumed that these men would later be heads of households. So internally, she seemed to give men greater responsibilities and rights.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:06 AM
0

There were a couple meta studies but even they disagree. Most of the studies showing a link seem to be from 1990-1994. But many of the recent studies do not show an increased rate of prostate cancer. So in my unqualified opinion, prostate cancer rates don't seem to be tied to vasectomies. This also is the opinion of the Mayo Clinic.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:30 AM
–

There are conflicting studies with many finding no correlation between vasectomies and prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:33 AM
–

Citation needed
/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:58 AM
3

Her whole argument seems to hinge on the belief that because the child was born in New York, New York has jurisdiction over the case. That only works if you assume that where a child is born determines home state, not where the parents live. Hell, my sister's kids were born in a different state than they live in (because that's where the closest big hospital is). Does that mean that they would have to travel to a different state if they ever had a custody dispute? Also, that second page going of…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 05:20 AM
7

It has everything to do with the ACA; 100% coverage for female birth control and sterilization is part of the law. There is no such provision for male birth control.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:59 PM
5

Not quite. It's this way because the ACA requires insurance plans to 100% cover female sterilization.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:55 PM
–

The answer shouldn't be to deny either gender the choice, it should be to give both genders the choice.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:57 PM
5

And you're basing that statement on what? The assumption that there are no racists left?
/r/MensRights12/09/13 12:32 AM
6

I forgot that discrimination is ok if the person doing the discriminating is a good person in other ways.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter