| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.As I said, you and I can not have a constructive conversation. There was nothing in your reply that could be understood to be constructive. At this point, I do not wish to have a discussion with you, constructive or otherwise. At an earlier point I could and would have had a discussion with you... however, my interest in doing so was lost after you made several inaccurate assessments of my stance before ever asking me about my stance, and then lecturing me about things that I never said or claim… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/13 09:30 PM |
| 0 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.Should the Civil Rights Movement also "team up" with the KKK, as well? Absurd. If this is your strawman argument, then I do not believe you and I can have a constructive conversation. You do know that it is feminists that have been severely damaging men's rights for the last uh... 5 decades right? Disingenuous. If this is what you conclude from the last five decades of general improvement for both men and women, then I do not believe you and I can have a constructive conversation. Seems like its… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/13 02:41 PM |
| 0 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.I didn't suggest it. It's your interpretation of what I said. Let me rephrase it. I read the article. It is divisive in the sense of "why feminists are wrong" which easily suggests that "we [who are for men's rights] are right." The article you posted, as well as other articles I read afterwards, position the "Men's Rights" group against feminists. To insist on this division is counter-productive and pointless. Those advocating Men's Rights should be speaking out against those in authority (i.e.… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/13 02:34 AM |
| 0 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.I know this. But thank you anyways. Sorry, I read to quickly... "Feminism" is a movement striving for equal rights for women. I do not believe the movement is attempting to restrict men's rights, unless the current rights that men have are unfair to women. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/13 02:24 AM |
| 0 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.No. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/13 10:25 PM |
| 0 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.ME: So your stance is exactly the same stance as the author of this article? JohntheOther and I have identical stances on this issue. As do most MRA's. I read the article. It is divisive in the sense of "why feminists are wrong" which easily suggests that "we men are right." | /r/MensRights | 21/02/13 10:04 PM |
| 1 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.Thank you. I thought this would be a good subreddit to join, but if this forum is geared for division of the sexes instead of equality between the sexes, then I don't think this is material I would find interest in. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/13 09:57 PM |
| 0 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.So your stance is exactly the same stance as the author of this article? | /r/MensRights | 21/02/13 09:14 PM |
| 1 | Gillette trying to impose hairless chest in Brazil trough advertising, and got burned.Sorry for coming into this thread late... I'm confused about what your stance is, AryoBarzan. Are you saying that feminism is a bad thing? Are you saying that feminism should address men's issues? | /r/MensRights | 21/02/13 07:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter