TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

unsureabouteverythng Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by unsureabouteverythng on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don’t know how you can act as though the founder being LDS is relevant to the fact that porn increases sexual violence. There are so many studies showing this that is pretty much indisputable at this point. This is not to mention that porn ITSELF is increasingly becoming more violent. Porn containing violence has become the most popular by far. While the studies back this up, you don’t need to review them all to understand the common sense idea that watching women being degraded and beaten, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 02:51 AM
2

So apparently YOU, a random redditor, are an expert on the topic and know exactly what you’re talking about, unlike this schmut who has devoted his entire life to conducting careful scientific research on the topic. Wow, interesting! Oh and it’s also interesting that you keep bringing up religion even though literally nobody else did!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 09:12 PM
0

You don’t think it contributes to a societal attitude of sexual objectification?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:42 AM
1

Just because something is a fact of life at the moment means it cannot be tackled and society cannot put it in the past? What about slavery in the USA? Should people just have concluded that it’s a fact of life and left victims to their own devices? That’s a poor argument. So is your Puritanism claim. Newsflash, there are plenty of non-puritans and non-religious people who agree with the science that porn is detrimental. Like myself. You’re actually discrediting this researcher’s findings based …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:51 PM
0

Wow so edgy, maybe you can take a listen to my link now? You know, the one that actually includes a scientific take?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:25 PM
0

https://youtu.be/94e2ybYqXqU Listen to this if you don’t believe me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:08 PM
0

You’re very, very, VERY off base here. Instead of actually giving arguments for porn supposedly being perfectly fine, you actually just accuse me of virtue signaling. You don’t know my views about any of that, btw, so interesting that you straw man about Nike shoes. You’re wrong about porn reducing sexual violence. Respectable researchers on the topic report that it INCREASES sexual violence significantly. You could actually read some stats from reputable sources before commenting in your inflam…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 10:49 PM
1

No, there are a LOT more reasons porn is problematic than just disgust or assigning religious meaning. Porn addictions affect people of all kinds, religious or not. You need to study up on this issue. Pornography is unhealthy at its best and life-destroying at its worst, not just for users, but for the human beings who are exploited to produce the pornography.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:17 PM
4

It’s a red flag if someone can masturbate without foreign materials to hijack their natural sexuality? Your views are messed up buddy. Sex is not porn. Porn is not sex. Healthy sexuality is hindered by counterfeits such as porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:11 PM
1

For the most part, yes. There is a good point to be made about exploiting real people vs fictional characters, but in terms of addiction, unrealistic and/or harmful fetishizing, and rewiring one’s sexual expectations in general, I think they’re not too different.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:08 PM
1

These fantasies have been popularized because of the porn industry. Without it, I seriously doubt these kinks would be widespread. Porn has never been about portraying healthy relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 06:37 PM
1

Not really. You made a claim and didn’t back it up. What about the original post caused you to claim they are not staying in their lane?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:19 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:06 PM
2

Cool. So people should stay in their lanes and everyone can be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:03 PM
3

How am I the bitter one in this conversation? Lol you’re bitter af
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 04:01 PM
2

I didn’t say it made me special...I’m saying it’s my right to have a preference and not your right to tell people they can’t have that preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 03:40 PM
9

Yes, you should. Not on the first date, but once you have rapport. And you should reveal the same about yourself when asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:56 PM
2

Lol. I AM a woman. And I’m married to someone with the same values towards sex as I have. WE DO EXIST.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:48 AM
18

👏👏👏
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:15 AM
3

Why? You don’t think it’s reasonable that someone would want to be with someone of similar values?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:14 AM
9

Yes and by that same token, men who do care about N count can choose to move on if the woman he is initially interested in has a high N-Count. I don’t blame anyone who has a standard for this. In fact I do myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 05:11 AM
1

There’s no such thing as a bad kid. Just a misunderstood, unloved kid who acts out as a way to get attention due to not receiving it to begin with. Unfortunately this line of thinking—blaming young children for being annoying—is all too common in mothers and fathers alike. It is the parent’s job to love their kid unconditionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 05:49 AM
1

I’ve met women whose husbands work less hours than them and the husbands still don’t do housework or pick up after themselves. I think you’re over generalizing here
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 08:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter