TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

usergeneration Archive

View 0 posts and 131 comments by usergeneration on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Right? It's still wrong and the bully should be reprimanded but if you dot expect this to happen you are living in a fantasy land of tolerance.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:57 PM
1

I don't think I used the word discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:58 PM
1

You're talking about high school/college. I'm talking about elementary school an middle school. And it's insulting when they make it "get women into this" instead of "get children interested."
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:42 PM
-2

It's a gender role thing. I'm guessing a lot less girls are introduced to videogames and programming as children.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:41 PM
2

It is patronizing. But back in elementary and middle school they should e encouraging everyone and ignoring gender.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:39 PM
3

Once you account for life choices like education/major and taking off work to have children, women make .98 to the dollar. The real issue is education. Girls are not being encouraged to join engineering and computer science fields, instead they more often end up with women's studies majors. Guess which pays better..
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:13 AM
5

And wouldn't gamefly be more than enough? Why did she need to buy them except to take that picture?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:50 PM
13

Furthermore the bartenders and GM probably act friendly to keep business and elect the floor guy to play bad cop. It seems like a premeditated ruse.
/r/seduction19/01/13 08:45 PM
0

Faux medical practices are a different story. It's dangerous because people think they are getting something besides a placebo. I'd rather not spend time with a mystic who has no concept of reality or fact. Listening to conspiracy theories and spirit voices all day gets tiring.
/r/seduction11/01/13 11:24 AM
-4

it violates never stick your dick in crazy, and man I keep forgetting how shallow this place is.
/r/seduction11/01/13 08:15 AM
-7

Acupuncture yea a scam. that was my point. holistic healing is crap. I didnt say drugs, I said medicine which would include treatment. It says she was considering it not that she did it. I worded my sentence poorly, OP should not consider girls into holistic medicine.
/r/seduction11/01/13 07:24 AM
-8

Op is still a douche for even considering a company selling holistic medicine.
/r/seduction11/01/13 06:34 AM
1

Am I the only person in this thread that knows what an http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unreliable_narrator is? Stop taking what he writes at face value. There is a story going on beneath the facade the op is presenting. He is writing the way he does to sound cool.
/r/seduction11/01/13 04:38 AM
2

So shallow. Not all friendships and dates are predicated on sex. Maybe he just wants to be friends with her. Nothing wrong with that.
/r/seduction10/01/13 08:08 PM
3

He wasn't acting? Come on, read all his responses to things.
/r/seduction10/01/13 08:07 PM
22

Exactly what I said. Twaz a chessmatch and op got a checkmate.
/r/seduction10/01/13 09:55 AM
35

OP delivered, and as I read it it sounds as she caught on to his games and outplayed him. She delivered the perfect repulsive character with so much confidence in herself that he was awestruck. She literally out fake-confidenced him. She acted as if she was worth every dime on the planet and op took the bait. Well played. To OP: next time, drop the act and just be a normal person.
/r/seduction10/01/13 09:53 AM
1

That is the problem with /r/all. People upvote crap from communities they are not a part of. /r/all should be removed, or "opt-in"
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:28 PM
2

As srs would say shiftthatdidnthappen.txt It's sad this crap gets upvoted here.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:03 AM
-2

Define moving the economy forward? Does bigger mean better? Do we want more spending? Is size the factor used to evaluate goodness? If we switched to efficiency, you would want the economy to be small and lean, not bloated and reckless.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:42 AM
2

Does dressing wealth make you more likely to get robbed in the ghetto?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:38 AM
3

I'll disagree. I lurk here and dissent and defense of feminism does get upvoted when it's rational and not rhetoric, jargon, and hyperbole. I find reasonable answers towards the top all the time. When sexist crap gets upvoted, one of the top comments is usually users decrying the behavior. Srs bans non hivemind thought, mr doesn't.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:34 AM
1

So you shouldn't have to pay for it? I think we should add fruit to the list of things you don't have to pay for because fruit is delicious and I want some.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:27 PM
7

"as men"? Really, you're going to generalize and complain that they do it?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:34 PM
1

MRA has always been serious business, they take jokes about as well as srs. What makes them better is allowing dissent and not banning people who disagree, hence you still being here.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 08:26 PM
2

I believe it, women live longer, so inheritance should favor them slightly.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:35 PM
1

Yes I meant rent from amazon streaming.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:29 PM
1

It doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:50 PM
1

Amazon? Netflix?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:44 PM
2

Or don't tag people and let their arguments speak for them instead of your prejudices.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:53 PM
3

Or you know rent it.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:49 PM
5

Bell wanted to get with an abusive guy who imprisoned people. Stockholm syndrome? You can literally go down the line as to why the princesses are bad role models and the princes are terrible people. It gets better around lion king and by Mulan/Tarzan they seem to have developed both sexes equally. Tangled basically turned into a buddy cop comedy.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:44 PM
1

MRA's don't even have extremists. Oh give me a break, the movement isn't perfect. There are plenty of fringe participants with "fuck women" style rhetoric. You really think there are no people who associate as mra's who are not something to be proud of?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:23 PM
1

I guess the loud minority is as powerful as the volume of people willing to listen. Maybe the MRA movement is better at discrediting fringe idiocracy. Maybe feminism is more comfortable with extremist rhetoric. I don't know.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:43 PM
14

I have to agree. When I look at both movements I see way more extreme hatred coming form the feminist side. More often than not /r/MR has a pretty highly upvoted comment explaining a situation in a calm way that makes sense. For gods sake, the article series this comes from is just the fbomb over and over. Oh ok that sure makes a rational dialogue. I love that they think the "fuck the other group" type behavior is acceptable only when they do it. Jezebel is the fox news of stupid emotional teena…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:11 AM
6

In practice there are always men new to the MR movement who are hurting very badly and have been told by society that they don't have any problems and should shut up. These guys need a place to vent and heal before they can look more objectively at gender issues. Agree to disagree. Men don't need to vent by being sexist assholes. You can talk shit about your bitch but "all women are bitches" is completely unnecessary rhetoric. Sorry, but part of being better than the other groups is not condonin…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:04 AM
3

"If men want equal rights they should become feminists" is something I equate to you can only stand for white people if you are a neonazi. Something feminists don't understand is that they don't speak for all women. Some woment disagree with them, and do not associate with the movement, just like many white people don't associate with neonazis EVEN THOUGH the neonazi movement may benefit them directly.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:37 AM
45

I find it funny that this article defines MRA's by the few bad apples and feminists by the majority minus the extremists. Double standard? The truth is, both groups define each other by the loudest most irrational members, thus leading to hatred when the majority of their members fucking agree on most things. If either group really want's respect they need to denounce THEIR own extremist voices. Feminists: instead of standing firm with the radicals, call them out for being lunatics. MRA's: Speak…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:35 AM
2

iPhone autocracy always messes with that one :/
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:45 PM
2

It IS a dogma and ideology. It is taught as absolute fact. What kind of discipline teaches you not to question its tenents?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:16 PM
1

maybe they are just 'taking life' by the balls...
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:39 PM
0

Nah it's rude, whiney, and needy against both men and women, just like its namesake a female dog.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:53 AM
1

Damnit.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:51 AM
25

Guys can be bitches too. Cunt is gender neutral in the UK. Fag has taken on a newer meaning closer to douchebag than homosexual. I'm not saying these are wright or wrong but you have to look at how language is used and intended not taking things so literally. I think bitch is an apt yet pejorative description of the way the girl is acting and it has nothing to do with her sex, it has to do with her attitude.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:48 AM
1

Not here. Reddit proper. That shit would get upvoted in a second. A men should be mowing the lawn joke never would.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:16 PM
-3

K im not going to defend them BUT you do understand what they are doing right. They are pointing out people think its funny when you make jokes where women are the punchline (kitchen) but not men. What about the menz is a classic way to get banned. Why is this possibly upvoted in /r/MR ?? This belongs in /r/noshit or /r/commonsense
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:28 PM
1

Nsfw is filtered out if you don't have an account.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:33 AM
1

sure if they set up their own subreddit. another reason people shouldnt be browsing reddit from /r/all
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:01 AM
1

I think the KKK is immoral. They should be allowed on reddit too.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:02 PM
1

You don't seem to get it. There is a difference between what I don't like and what should be allowed. Creepshots are creepy, I don't think they are cool. I also dont think memes or cat pictures are cool. If I had my way I would ban aww, adviceanimals, and f7u12 because I dont like them AND they infest the frontpage. Do you see the problem yet?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:31 AM
1

It sounds like your trying to prevent certain content, by having it banned.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:41 PM
1

I dont force my opinion on others. I can make my case, but I can't force them to do what I want them to.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:10 PM
1

You don't get to decide what is moral. Next piracy gets banned. Then criticism of reddit. Then all support of the democrats. You don't ban things because you find them immoral.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:59 PM
1

You seem incapable of realizing I'm not defending incest, even though I understand how to make the argument. Should people be allowed to talk about topics I don't like: yes.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:55 PM
1

How about two brothers?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:54 PM
2

You don't get it. Photography is protected first amendment speech. There is no such thing as consent in public. You consented by going in public.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:53 PM
2

Stop saying creepshots is extreme. It makes it incredibly hard for any one to take your side when you are throwing hyperbole around.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:51 PM
0

Well the supreme court disagrees with you.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:50 PM
7

Why not just read better sites.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:58 AM
6

I thought it was 51 hours until he committed assisted suicide.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:49 AM
34

Doxxing is morally reprehensible. Two wrongs dont make a right.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:40 AM
23

You don't get to draw the line. It doesn't work that way. You are not the end all be all moral judge. Either you believe in free speech or you think there should be limits on what people can say, and dissent can be censored.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:38 AM
11

So clothed people are extreme perversions, but gonewild and nsfw are ok?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:36 AM
32

I guess if you keep repeating that creepshots and jailbait are illegal enough times, maybe it'll come true.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:34 AM
1

You did. This book is about the creation of the railroad and its effects on culture. Were you alive during the industrial revolution?
/r/seduction01/10/12 01:15 PM
1

No what? No why?
/r/seduction01/10/12 12:54 PM
1

If you could make it sound smarter, your value is your intelligence.
/r/seduction01/10/12 12:13 PM
3

If anyone wants to give a slightly more educated sounding answer I suggest reading The Railway Journey: The Industrialization and Perception of Time and Space by Wolfgang Schivelbusch. It talks about how our perceptions of privacy and personal space(not the same space in the title) are driven by which way our train seats face. In America they face forward, in Europe they face towards each other.
/r/seduction01/10/12 12:08 PM
4

Women would start keeping it a secret until trimester 2.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:15 AM
-4

by this logic the man should also be allowed to continue the pregnancy and find a surrogate mother. why is that not an option? a court order preventing termination until the offspring is viable enough to be transplanted. Because they both have equal power, yet she is still the one that has to face the medical risk of gestation, birth, recovery and, potentially, the risk her future fertility. The male party does not have to face those dangers to make the same decision. this is a valid point thoug…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:55 AM
2

If they source their quotes use the same source, don't link to a blog.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:11 AM
2

That doesnt mean a better line wouldnt work better. Honestly, I have heard enough girls say they hate this line that I would never say it. It might work, but why would you say things to people they hate hearing?
/r/seduction24/09/12 05:24 AM
2

Medical marijuana is a good example. A lot of people see it as a baby step to legalization, but in reality it is a terminal solution to give a monopoly to doctors (taking it from gangs) and still prevent complete freedom.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:29 AM
2

Ok
/r/seduction17/09/12 12:10 PM
1

There is no reason to overtly lead with "I only want to fuck" "if she only wants a relationship and that's not what you want" I don't think you can consider yourself the prize. Sleaziest thing I've read all morning.
/r/seduction16/09/12 09:07 PM
13

Not driving to house parties would be a very good idea if possible. A "you couldn't have me even if you wanted me" attitude will go a long way. They. We'd to know you want to be friends with them because they are human. They will reject you if they sense you are literally interested in fucking any of them. Make them feel special, because they are.
/r/seduction16/09/12 12:31 PM
1

Youre thinking too hard, and i hate pua lingo. if you have to think about "negging" it wont work. Just be a smartass/alec.
/r/seduction29/08/12 02:30 PM
1

Adjective: Conceited or arrogant, esp. in a bold or cheeky(impertinently bold; impudent and saucy) way. Your playful is my cocky. It's semantics.
/r/seduction29/08/12 12:30 PM
1

Ok, I am not so angry. If anything I wish girls were more selective and didn't pick the first oaf they see. When it comes to one night stands brawn > brains. I play plenty of hard to get. I am overly selective, and at times get jealous of the guys with lower standards.
/r/seduction28/08/12 09:33 AM
1

Ok, I am not so angry. If anything I wish girls were more selective and didn't pick the first oaf they see. When it comes to one night stands brawn > brains.
/r/seduction28/08/12 09:32 AM
2

I never advocated actually sleeping with taken people. This is all advice in how to be comfortable talking to people and starting in control of the conversation. That line is a good way to diffuse the awkward "I have a boyfriend" and maybe make a friend. Plus there is a chance the girl is lying anyway. In that case I say go for it. Also reddit isn't a singular person, it can't be hypocritical. It is a bunch of separate communities. I'm guessing relationshipsadvice and pickup have different stand…
/r/seduction28/08/12 09:12 AM
2

No reading, more talking. Practice pushing buttons, and coming up with witty but cocky smart alec retorts.
/r/seduction28/08/12 09:10 AM
3

Say "if thats what you want/like" and smirk. There is nothing serious about that line, unless they wan it to be.
/r/seduction28/08/12 09:08 AM
1

That's the joke. It's the exact opposite of what they expect, and it throws them off balance. Plus girls like assholes and nice guys finish last, amiright? So you're hinting at having a playfully mean dark side.
/r/seduction28/08/12 09:06 AM
6

Dude exactly, you got it.
/r/seduction28/08/12 09:02 AM
36

Rules) the most important thing is shock value. Make them squirm. Don't censor yourself. Never care. Sometimes pretend like you stopped listening, then later reference what you weren't listening to. Lots of smirks and eye rolls. If you follow this foolproof method you WILL get slapped in the face by the end of the night. If you don't try more less harder.
/r/seduction27/08/12 09:21 PM
3

Ahh, I've never read a pickup book, I just talk to people to see what gets under their skin.
/r/seduction27/08/12 09:15 PM
9

No. No no no. Still no. Maybe a quip about when she is ready to upgrade or if she wants someone who will rough her up better because the current bf is leaving her face too pretty. You don't offer to fucking share her.
/r/seduction27/08/12 08:32 PM
67

Not the "does he treat you well? (yea) I wouldn't"?
/r/seduction27/08/12 08:29 PM
8

Was it even a shittest or a "does he like me for my brain or just want to fuck me" test?
/r/seduction27/08/12 08:29 PM
1

Right, because not only is it cocky but you're also implying that a) you don't have to try and b) it's virtually inevitable that she will cave and make the first move. You put the ball in her court and paint her out to be the aggressor for even broaching the subject. After maybe tell her to get her mind out of the gutter. "I'm still deciding" makes it sound like you care. Mine doesn't. Mine is best said with a smirk and a scoff. I can do this all day.
/r/seduction27/08/12 07:33 PM
7

"trying would be an overstatement"
/r/seduction25/08/12 12:40 PM
2

I was expecting more crazy, your username is a lie.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:12 AM
2

You're saying cunt is t derogatory to women anymore and is a general word. I'm saying the same thing about faggot, it just means douchebag at this point.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:52 PM
1

Then can I use faggot on straight people without someone calling me homophobic? If the meaning of words change...
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:32 PM
3

Asshole is ableist towards people without shitholes.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:58 AM
3

But the hurtful swear words are all specific to a subgroup. Faggot, douche, cunt,
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:52 AM
0

"in your dreams" followed by a slightly sinister/devilish smirk might be more subtle yet to the point. The implication being she dreams about you or will, or that she wishes you were sweet. It works on the same level as the exchange H: "I have a boyfriend" Y: "does he treat you well" h: "yea" y: "I wouldn't"
/r/seduction17/06/12 06:07 PM
106

It is almost as if not all girls are the same. Weird.
/r/seduction16/05/12 03:28 AM
1

Because it is the exact same answer every time. Every time. Every time. The answer will never change. I will be asked this question thousands of more times in my life and I dread each and every one. Please please please don't use this question to fill awkward monents. Use it if the need for the information comes up naturally in conversation.
/r/seduction04/05/12 09:16 AM
1

No it's just textbook "I'm not interesting enough to come up with real conversation. It is completely different if the question comes up naturally in conversation. But it is one of the worst silence fillers ever.
/r/seduction04/05/12 01:34 AM
1

Yea I'm not an "eye for an eye" person. Punishment is to deter repeat offenses and to rehabilitate people, not to get even. I think having the national news media involved in a boy getting pantsed is kinda embarrassing.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 01:32 AM
7

That is probably my least favorite question to be asked soon into meeting someone.
/r/seduction03/05/12 12:43 PM
1

So is involving johnny law when the parents have it under control.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:47 PM
0

What does that have to do with punishing people? There is a huge difference between stopping a crime when it is committed and vengeful revenge. These kids should be helped not hurt. I hope one of your children makes a mistake someday.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:30 AM
9

Creepy uncle might be a better term. His shit works but it doesn't mean it's all good advice for how to treat humans.
/r/seduction01/05/12 10:09 PM
1

Because children are extremely impulsive and the high from the heat of the moment can overtake logic. I can't believe how many people think 13 year olds are rational creatures who think about the consequences of their actions. They are still the center of their own universe. They don't understand the world doesn't revolve around them. Sure some adult in a lecture told them not to pull down boys pants but sometimes instinct and "all in good fun" take over and lines get crossed. That eye for an ey…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:09 PM
6

That awkward moment when your subtle mockery is confused for simple sarcasm.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:29 PM
0

Like the genie in Aladdin ill take that to mean 'yes', youre not a parent.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:38 AM
-6

Wait wait wait. Women use emotion over logic. Hold the fucking press.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 03:39 AM
1

That doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 02:52 AM
1

Eh, agree to disagree. They are 13 they had no understanding of what they were doing. I have a feeling most people in this thread don't interact with children regularly.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:24 PM
-1

You still operate under the assumption that children are logical as oppose to impulsive. You also seem to have some odd trust in the authorities which is ironic for /r/mensrights who usually acknowledge that the systems fucks people more often than it helps them. My point being: children are stupid and primal. If you think the police are the best way to handle children you are off your rocker. This is a private matter between the parties involved. The MOTHER of the victim agrees with me.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:52 AM
1

Or kids just really don't understand the Internet or the concept of permanent.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:40 AM
-1

If it were three boys I would hope the parents have the same sense not to ruin lives. Two wrongs don't make a right. Just because boys would get fucked doesn't mean we should do it to girls to make the world fair. It might be assault but these are little kids. I really doubt you are a parent.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:21 AM
-2

Seriously, kids deserve 5 years probation for pulling down a boys pants? And you say you are a mother? What if it were your kids teasing someone else's? My god, let the parents handle it privately. If these girls get registered as sex offenders it will hang over their heads the REST OF THEIR LIVES. People make mistakes.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:41 PM
1

The people saying "shame on these parents" lock the kids up, must have been bullied and seeking revenge. I cant imagine how cold you have to be to say that. Or it is trolls trying to make MR look like the hate group it isnt.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:36 PM
-5

Compared to other people the news find to exploit this mother seemed calm rational and sane. I'm actually very proud of her for not ruining these girls lives by having them become registered sex offenders. Kudos mom! I must fall into the minority camp of kids will be kids. It was wrong and terrible, but the legal system is even worse. If the genders were reversed I would hope the parents still handle it privately instead of letting some judge ruin lives. Do none of you remember being kids? Kids …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:08 PM
1

Not particularly
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:50 AM
38

I think this person is overhyping what is happening. The reddit admins are on board to prevent dox from surfacing. Anyone who does so will be in trouble. The admins likely said something to the effect of "please tell us and report any personal information." The user took this as 'we have the admins support.'
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:02 PM
1

i cant stand the 50 subreddit limit. easiest thing to do is sub to 50 per account and toggle between them.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:55 PM
1

Terry Rakolta
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:22 PM
1

I think every criticism you listed (that you have self admittedly heard many times) is valid. As has been said over and over again it is your tactic. You use "we tried it that way, gave up, and now circlejerk" as an excuse and cop out. People find your self righteousness annoying, and it if you care about getting your message out it would behoove you to change attack plans. Yeah, it's our problem, we're asking for it. If we were only not mocking them for making rape jokes YEA, what is so hard ab…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:19 AM
1

inline image viewing, never ending reddit, switching between multiple accounts, comment preview, and +dashboard are my favorite parts.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:21 AM
7

It's a little depressing that circlejerk has become the gold standard others shoot for. I do love it now though, not so much at first.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:50 PM
7

This is how I picture most activists/politicians/lobbyists in general. Take the over feminist feminist for example. She wakes up in the morning and the first thing she notices is oppression. Not the beautiful sunrise, not the birds chirping, but she jumps right to action. The President we need is the guy who is antisocial who sits in the corner reading books. Instead we elect the best looking guy who can speak well and make us feel good about ourselves. We champion the opinion which can be yelle…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:28 PM
6

Dude/dudette. Look what you can do with Reddit Enhancement Suite http://postimage.org/image/sc0rcg2sv/ It is called the +dashboard. You can essentially subscribe to multilinks. If you find my post interesting, check out http://www.reddit.com/r/multisubs+multi+goggles/
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:08 PM
11

Good observation. They hold a holier than thou self righteous attitude. I mean, I find /r/circlejerk to be a bit funner just because they dont concentrate on one type of post. They parody and mock reddit as a whole, instead of hiding behind an altruistic facade. SRS is funny because they think reddit NEEDS them or is better because it now has another circlejerk. "there is a legitimate need on this site for calling out the bullshit and right now we're the ones fulfilling that need." I would prefe…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:05 PM
10

See this kind of thing doesnt make sense So, until Reddit stops thinking that it is, or actually starts acting like it, we won't be going anywhere. Reddit is a platform. You will always get EVERY type of opinion. Reddit is not single hive mind like we pretend it is. Reddit will never stop getting posts that make us uncomfortable. That is why the admins invented the hide button. SRS Says: If reddit can boast that some acts of philanthropic altruism are representative of all reddit (when obviously…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:53 PM
12

{I dont want to ruin my own circlejerk before it starts BUT I may have lied a little. SRS is stupid but I find it very funny and entertaining. You guys are a hoot. That being said, even very experienced redditors dont know about many of those subs. I thought I would throw you guys a bone and show you some of the more interesting parts of reddit I have found. I by no means want SRS to end, but it would possibly be even more entertaining if you jerked in the geekier subreddits instead of concentra…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:36 PM
23

I am starting to get confused. Manhoodacademy has to be one of the dumbest things I have seen in a while. Well then again, there is also SRS. Poe's law has never been more applicable. People literally cant tell who the trolls are and who is serious. Manhood academy has some TEXTBOOK about something, and I flipped through it wondering who in their right mind would take the time to assemble a thousand page pdf of blabber. Then it hit me. Either this person is not of sound mind or it is a joke. It …
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter