usernameforreddit001 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	How do I attain casual sex with girls without trying to setup dates? So much simpler than trying to mislead or waste someone’s time.	/r/seduction	15/11/25 08:29 AM
1	How do I attain casual sex with girls without trying to setup dates? They actually would be more safe and regularly test than free hookups from apps. They’d be less likely to be pressured or give into pressure from the guy to take of barrier methods too.	/r/seduction	15/11/25 08:28 AM
1	How do I attain casual sex with girls without trying to setup dates? What make u think or imply there r girls with inflated sense of how attractive they are? Would u say Guys trying to aim for the most beautiful have an inflation of themselves too? And just because someone isn’t the most pretty , wouldn’t mean they need to have sex so easily. It’s a toxic mentality to imply how effort and worth is tied to looks. Attraction is also subjective. Even to expect a woman to come over straight away, when it’s a safety risk comes across and sounds like entitlement.	/r/seduction	15/11/25 08:22 AM
1	How do I attain casual sex with girls without trying to setup dates? So what’s the difference between the ones who easily sleep with you compared to the ones you want more but take effort, based on your last post on your profile?	/r/seduction	15/11/25 08:16 AM
1	How do I attain casual sex with girls without trying to setup dates? What u mean reduce standards?	/r/seduction	15/11/25 08:04 AM
8	Why do some men lose interest the moment a woman actually likes them back? a woman can take it slow to ward of guys like that, just mainly looking for sex, to avoid being used. If she put out easily there’s chance a guy would just move on. And There are ppl wanting exclusivity before sleeping with someone.	/r/seduction	15/11/25 07:49 AM
1	Why I quit dating apps forever (and what I now do instead) How do u approach her /start convo?	/r/seduction	15/11/25 07:42 AM
1	Why I quit dating apps forever (and what I now do instead) For women too. Woman can look better in person then in photos. Esp. If they don’t use filters or heavy makeup.	/r/seduction	15/11/25 07:40 AM
1	Apparently women just magically turn “demisexusal” around average men Can you give examples of niches of women?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/07/25 02:10 PM
1	Apparently women just magically turn “demisexusal” around average men “Aren’t good women” be mindful the sources of what you read. Someone getting physical soon doesn’t mean they are supposed to do it at the same time with everyone else. every person doesn’t treat everyone the same. Even males. Some just hook up with and others they’d want more with.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/07/25 02:09 PM
-9	checks notes men have to pay on the first date. How dare they expect you to split the check? It was there when initially replying, but now gone. 🤡🤡. I never stated what happened. Or shared that I know what happened. Hence the question 🤦‍♀️ You answered after complaining and going on about how ur offended by ppl asking u questions. I even asked u other questions unrelated to this thing ur hung up on. Yet u chose to ignore that. It wasn’t clear , ur statement of not raping one … if it was based on the verbal consent component alone in isolation . Or the other parts u were asked of too . C…	/r/EverydayMisandry	07/01/24 08:02 PM
1	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking Women don’t want to either. Most if not all would want to. Want and do are different things.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/08/23 02:24 PM
0	Is it true that a lot of guys are bitter about dating being better in their 30s? Can you share the data of relationship % in early 20s if you can.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/08/23 02:11 PM
1	I often hear women say "I have attractive male friends with awesome personalities, but I don't like them that way." If they're attractive, why aren't they attracted to them? Likely meant they are physically objectively attractive. But not personally subjectively attracted to them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/08/23 04:17 AM
1	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking There r guys who see it differently to you though in the context on not having sex straight away. And aren’t hyper focused if a woman had some casual relationship in the past and then be in spite because he didn’t get it instantly. Esp. If they themselves had casual relations in the past. There a guys who also want to have sex but chooses not to and be conscious and not rush it with one they like. It’s not about if someone has more or better option but where there’s is the most compatibility, ch…	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/08/23 04:12 AM
1	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking Not less likely , but not earlier. There’s many comments / reason describing why one does, if someone doesn’t like hearing it doesn’t matter what’s stated, someone will continuously disagree / not understand and just complain.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/08/23 03:00 AM
2	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking More so how the cake is eaten. The process of it than it just being swallowed. The cake was only one example, there can be thousands of others. Or with what u said if having the cake in the fridge .. don’t have to wait long to eat all of it. You can have pieces here and there, kisses, foreplay , oral sex can happen etc. don’t have to finish it in first night. even baking a cake can be used as an example. If u don’t like the patience of baking/cooking and only want to eat then u could just not ha…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 05:23 PM
4	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking Even if/when one provides different perspectives and reasons some will still deny, whine, complain that it’s ‘wrong’.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 04:20 PM
2	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking lol doesn’t have to be only first or second. Being objective implies not making assumptions. Suppose it’s important for one to acknowledge if they a speaking directly of their personal experience, and they can more be objective if they can openly hear other things and not criticise or say it doesn’t work, or only works in a negative sense like. Screwing one doesn’t lock them down. Goes both ways male or female. The ones who don’t have sex straight up don’t have the mentality of it being a limita…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 04:10 PM
2	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking Just clarified as ur assumptions mentioned things like shame, manipulation and such. Not everyone does sex on first date, but sure having casual sex is easy. Not meaningful usually, but fun and easy. Makes more sense as you were basing it on your personal projections / experiences. I was being objective. And what was implied with clarifying ‘fix’ is just because u or anyone who personally don’t like the idea of it means someone needs to be ‘fixed’ objectively, and there being nothing wrong with …	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 03:08 PM
1	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking To be reductionist and to simplify things and not consider other complexities in a real life settings and other aspects then sure. However there’s more to it. Someone can be equally attracted to two ppl physically .. but only like one of them emotionally.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 02:50 PM
2	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking Doesn’t mean it’s an ‘issue’. That’s another assumption. Sure fella, that’s your sole personal individual preference. Whether you’d need someone to drop their knickers for you on the first meeting or third or whatever precise measure of time you have. And if it works for you finding serious relationship then that’s good. With prospects that would depend on personal preference and compatibility. What determines the emotional side can’t always be forced and redirected, unless one is looking for ph…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 02:43 PM
2	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking If they’re a loser .. that’s not really anyone’s concern if person likes them. If one is a ‘chump’ but makes it far with many dates then the person they’re dating assumably wouldn’t see them like a ‘chump’ or else they wouldn’t be dating them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 01:46 PM
1	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking If they’re a loser .. that’s not really anyone’s concern if person likes them. If one is a ‘chump’ but makes it far with many dates then the person they’re dating assumably wouldn’t see them like a ‘chump’ or else they wouldn’t be dating them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 01:44 PM
0	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking It’s not always that a woman is ashamed of her sexuality .. they could be mindful of being judged externally due to societal expectations, perhaps society can change that. And not having sex easily doesn’t mean they are ashamed. Also not as a tool to manipulate but because of personal preference and/or being careful. A well rounded individual would understand there’s complexities to something and not assume it’s because it’s a ‘game’ unless they have their own projections and/or insecurities.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 01:36 PM
2	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking Probably depends on life stage, or whether it’s only physical compared to more. If it’s just physical they’d just get boxed in the ‘casual’ sector.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 01:16 PM
6	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking ‘You’d want to sleep with him right away’ .. want doesnt equate to doing it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 01:11 PM
1	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking Don’t think anyone implied they’d be ‘more interested sleeping with them’ that wouldn’t be the case. Generally with anyone they’d be more interested sleeping with the one they really like .. not just physically like but emotionally … it’s just that it has more weight on it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/08/23 01:05 PM
0	if withholding sex is not a good way to secure commitment, then what is? Ppl can withhold not to be ‘strategic’ but because they just don’t sleep around. How do you know she wasn’t ‘strategic’? If someone is only committing to get sex that is manipulation itself.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/23 01:21 PM
5	if withholding sex is not a good way to secure commitment, then what is? Someone can have desire but still have restraint …. when it comes to anything.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/23 01:17 PM