TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vacantstare Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by vacantstare on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Wrists or jugular, hell I've see people do some serious damage with a paper clip.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:54 AM
9

Exactly what I was thinking. If the reason the state requires Child support is because it would cause undue hardship on the child then the woman who purposefully made the choice to conceive and bring said child into the world is unfit to be a parent. She selfishly and unethically acted against the child's interest even before the child was a lawfully a child.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:33 PM
5

Quebec
/r/MensRights06/03/14 05:39 PM
4

Imagine a Nursing school with a reversal on their site; “In a profession dominated by women, men adapt better to change." I mean if that happened, N.O.W would have a collective aneurysm.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 06:12 AM
2

For a little etymology it is a take off the way you refer to isomers in chemistry ie Cis and Trans. Cis from Latin meaning roughly same side and trans meaning opposite side. Cis meaning physical genitalia and mental gender on the same side and trans being opposing physical and mental genders.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 08:15 AM
7

It is the People's Republic of San Francisco. I love this city but its politics leave much to be desired.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 08:08 AM
3

What really strikes me in the thread is the belittling and blaming for not using a condom. What if its true she told him she was on birth control and sabotaged it? Not not saying she did this but if she did not use the control properly or deliberately sabotaged it the consensus still seems to be it was his fault. If i were to lie about a vasectomy or poke holes in a condom I would be demonized (and possibly charged with rape). No one would question the woman as to why she trusted me and that sta…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:33 AM
2

While I understand the theory that it is paid to the children, there needs to be ( if the state is going to enforce) a follow up and reporting of expenditures relating to the child. IMO if the state is involved and tracing wages,making sure the man pays (coercing payment) then the state should also follow through and make sure the custodial parent is spending the money on the child.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:21 AM
18

I really wish the media took a role in public shaming.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:27 AM
1

I am gonna come at it another way here from my perspective. I used to be real uncomfortable in the gym b/c of the other men in there. I thought my form was being judged that everyone could tell how much of a scrub I was. Then I realized that there were many more people not working out. That I was already "alpha as fuck" compared to the other dudes not in the gym. To the women and uncomfortable issue, don't be ( they might be thinking the same thing plus datig w/in the gym is bad just like intra-…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:33 AM
5

The problem isn't that men cant fell threatened. It is that society refuses to acknowledge mens' issues and demonizes people trying to help a fellow human being, if the individual happens to be male. It is a shame that this radical notion of equality has been for all intents and purposes been transformed from "feminism= equality" to "feminism = pay back". This system perpetuates an egregious misunderstanding of what it is to be human. It misses that the sexes are compliments. That just as women …
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:13 AM
5

Yeah but Gary Johnson would lap them both.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:16 PM
-1

here is a link to multiple studies and papers on the medical benefits of circumcision regarding HIV infection and the AIDS epidemic in Africa. http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/InSite?page=kbr-07-02-10 I am not trying to justify anything only trying to inform the readers here and prevent confirmation bias in this sub reddit.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:15 AM
-1

I have taken Aids and infection disease classes from some of researchers at UC Berkeley and the verifiable claim that circumcision does in fact reduce the transmission of HIV has been replicated in scientific studies. I'll leave this here, it is a quick short blog post on Cal's site about the UN and other governments sweeping it under the rug. Also to possibly stop the down votes here is a page which links to the many papers and studies on the subject to bolster the claim: Sources
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:09 AM
5

Wow. If the Federal Government considers him 100% disabled and unable to hold a job one would think that his ex wife, who is able to work, would have to pay him spousal support. Instead they take half his income which he has no way of raising more? WTF?!
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:39 PM
7

I think the only solution is to have vice squads of undercover handsome male police canvassing bars for drunk women that try to take them home or agree to go home with them. Then charge them with being "Drunk and horny". We can bill it as a " Rape Prevention Task-force. /s
/r/MensRights20/05/12 09:44 PM
2

I came here to post that, have a upvote.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:54 AM
1

Yes. If there was consent from both parties and if neither party has the ability to revoke consent then mandatory child support should be imposed on the party attempting to defraud the other by absconding or shirking duties agreed upon.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:44 AM
1

The solution you are advocating does nothing to resolve the root of the problem , it merely shifts the imbalance of power to favor the man instead of the woman. It's tricky because if women have the right to revoke consent then they should have no right to compulsory child support. But if men have the right to revoke consent they should have no right to.... ceteris paribus there is nothing of equal weight that men would be denied.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:38 AM
1

No. I am not sure what led you to believe I want to limit access. What I do not believe is that the consequences of an action should be imposed on an individual that did not or cannot makes the decision which results in said consequences. If abortion is a choice that only a woman can make then only she should be held responsible for the outcomes and consequences. Those consequences include the costs of raising the resulting child.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:17 AM
2

I think the problem with consenting to a child is that the woman can revoke consent at anytime, ie abortion, while a man cannot. This creates a great inequality. This is the root of the Child Support problem. Where as the choice the woman makes ultimately effects the man over a period of 18 years; a man has no recourse and cannot revoke consent.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 04:29 AM
75

She is now recovering at Cuntry Meadows Hospital.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter