TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vanhooydonk Archive

View 3 posts and 23 comments by vanhooydonk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Lots of noise about gender equality in STEM and the boardroom. The sewer and the coal mine? Not so much.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen06/05/20 08:21 PM
12

Subscribe to TheBasedPluto people. He exposes bluepilled hypocrisy I didn't even recognise. Thanks for your work Bro
/r/BlackPillScience22/04/20 09:42 PM
16

Does California still have mines? Why is there is no statutory requirement for a woman in each shaft?
/r/MensRights01/01/20 04:20 PM
6

If you're <5'8", you could be an olympic gold medalist, but no sperm bank's taking your goods. Inclusion in 2020.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 04:18 PM
3

The cognitive dissonance must be the worst part when the hypocrisies and double standards are exposed.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 10:49 PM
58

Less people read articles than headlines. Misinform people, then successfully defend any complaints because the article few read clarified the truth later on.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/12/19 04:40 PM
2

Porn addiction is the obvious outcome in a digital society where one sex has enforced dry spells.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 02:10 PM
17

We need more women in lots of sectors; logging, mining, utilities, waste. Not much noise from middle class feminists here.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 07:44 AM
7

I asked our HR department what would constitute an 'appropriate' advance. No answer was forthcoming.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:36 AM
23

Why does gender balance end at senior roles and STEM? What about coal mining and refuse collection? Are dangerous jobs somehow exempt?
/r/MensRights04/12/19 06:58 PM
2

An uglier guy being fired for exactly the same action as a hot guy offends most people's sense of justice, that's the concern. If meeting people at work was unacceptable, that'd at least be a clear rule, but 20% of couples do meet this way and somebody must 'have hit on' the other. It's fine if you get lucky is a BS rule.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 09:28 AM
1

Must be fairer than most of the UK. One wrong look and out here.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 01:10 AM
1

It pivots on workplace policies (at least in the UK) permitting the complainant to determine what is wanted / unwanted, appropriate / inappropriate. I'm sure this was conceived with the best intentions, but in this scenario no-one has any objective knowledge as to what the rules are. It's similiar to a sportsplayer being able to determine what constituents a foul, and permitting the hunky second baseman to do things the shortass catcher can't. Avoidance or clairvoyance are the are the catcher's …
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:58 AM
1

The first part is fair enough. Societal expectations on harrassment have moved into the realms of high emotional intelligence, if not telepathy or time travel, in order to foresee any reprocity or offense. We could stick with this, but it results in many men simply avoiding women because the risks are too great, and women complaining this avoidance is denying them opportunities for career progression.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:30 AM
4

All fair points, but autism is quite normal at 1 in 42 men, with much higher ratios in tech etc. It's also interesting that the default view is that the disability should be trained out of people (like how gay conversion therapy was used), rather than embraced like many other disabilities.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 08:30 PM
6

It is complicated for anyone on the autistic spectrum, these are the very indications they struggle with. Misread a sign and they're in front of HR (for all the HR virtue signalling about disability equality, social disabilities like autism don't count).
/r/MensRights30/11/19 08:01 PM
26

Most workplace policies state that unwanted advances are inappropriate, irrespective of the number of 'attempts'. So be able to see into the future or be a 6'2" model.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 02:52 PM
1

No mention of height in there, despite it being one the strongest predictors of success. The average height of a CEO is 6'2", which on the face of it limits the chances of short men and virtually all women, yet gender is always the characteristic that advantage pivots upon.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 05:40 PM
14

👧'Men should talk about their feelings' 👴'Ok, I kinda love you' 👧'Hello, human resources?'
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/10/19 07:23 PM
6

'Safe and inclusive' for everyone, except people with high functioning autism, the very disability that would lead to someone being uncertain if an advance was wanted or not due to difficulty reading cues. These kind of policies basically turn the fundamental legal principle of presumption of innocence of its head. (And then feminists complain men aren't mentoring women anymore).
/r/MensRights02/10/19 09:14 AM
5

I once experimented with an old dating profile. I had zero luck and altered my profile from my genuine 5'6" to a fake 6'2", whilst keeping everything else constant. No changes were made to the headshot profile pic, other information or the type of chat. Responses multiplied like crazy, I'd estimate by tenfold. That's the life of a shortass in a paragraph.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 12:58 PM
2

This is the same split as the suicide ratio, but reversed. Do the BBC consider that a 'vast' minority of suicides are women?
/r/MensRights14/09/19 10:43 AM
0

I work in a job where I manage a budget and receive lots of sales calls. It's amazing to contrast the charm, flattery, sociability of female salespeople versus the general disinterest exhibited in 'normal' life where a reciprocal 'hello' is an achievement.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 07:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter