TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vanillapopsicle Archive

View 1 posts and 527 comments by vanillapopsicle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Activism/Supportvanillapopsicle/r/MensRights13/04/21 09:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Excellent, tell one of your white female friends to post on social media that she only likes white men, as a social experiment. That’s assuming you have any, of course. She won’t lmao because she knows. Everyone knows, except for you apparently, enjoying that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 10:16 PM
0

Watch what he did to Ann Coulter if you really want to find him attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 10:11 PM
1

This dude’s probably racist
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:38 PM
4

Alcohol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:34 PM
1

Yes, she would. Keep living in your dreamland. And enjoy that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:21 PM
1

Nice, harden that heart into stone.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:17 PM
0

Then he’s rebuffed quickly. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:04 PM
10

guy asks for empathy in forum post woman on forum gives him none Derp
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:37 AM
4

I’m describing what will generally happen. I’m not concerned with myself. These are general societal patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:56 PM
0

No, that’s not likely, sorry. It’s more likely it’s one sided.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:46 PM
1

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:07 PM
0

His point is she’s not a real friend. Then you confirmed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:02 PM
1

Nice, enjoy that privilege, if a white woman said that she’d be destroyed by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:54 PM
2

Shut up, you disgusting bigot.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:52 PM
2

You’re not calling them enough names.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:49 PM
1

Yes, my larger point is never apologize, even if you word something badly, maybe reword it, but never, ever show weakness.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:48 PM
3

Yes, she’s misrepresenting the study entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:44 PM
12

She won’t interact with the 100. That’s the entire point. She’ll interact with the 10 she finds attractive. There is no second stage. Many never make it past the waiting room.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:43 PM
2

I have no idea if you’re a man or a woman or what you’re trying to say with this post
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:28 AM
2

Lmaooo
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:27 AM
2

The reason given is always bullshit. Ignore it. Yes, better to be thrilling and exciting than boring and nice.
/r/seduction01/01/22 09:23 AM
3

Lmaooo
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 09:18 AM
1

Incorrect, I can’t count the many times I’ve seen black women saying they only date their own race.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:56 AM
5

Oh no, it is quite clear you’re a bootlicking man.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:29 AM
13

Tell me you’re a bigot without telling me you’re a bigot.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:28 AM
5

Why not? Could be a form of financial rape.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:28 AM
58

Never apologize to nutjobs - instead double down. Just say it’s a form of financial rape or something. The minute you get defensive, you lose.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:27 AM
4

If she did any of the things expected of a friend? Way to expose yourself lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:13 AM
8

It was not feminists. It was Marxists, all of the people OP mentioned were merely used/amplified by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:26 AM
5

Lately Asians have been on the come up
/r/seduction30/12/21 09:33 AM
5

Some will give up and retreat to just work and videogames and porn. For these men, hope is over as they usually stop taking care of themselves. Some will settle for what they can get, usually someone they are not thrilled with. And others will stop playing the game and simply focus on their hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 11:02 PM
4

I knew someone that went to nursing school and she said many do it simply to marry a doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 06:06 AM
2

Loll
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 07:28 AM
2

It’s not honesty they’re attracted to. It’s fearlessness. Women are attracted to fearlessness on a primal level because it says that man is ready to fight at any moment. It makes her feel both safe and excited.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 07:26 AM
1

Just be cool and play along with whatever they flow with
/r/seduction24/12/21 07:02 AM
2

It’s not about the virginity per se, it’s about what it represents or about what the quintessential good girl represents: loyalty. That is what makes it attractive; it signals good long term qualities to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 09:01 AM
2

Where is the flaw? Yes, men may biologically want to sleep with many women, but spiritually/emotionally/mentally they want one good woman. The biological urge comes and goes and is not the most important thing. And you’re missing the point that the women have the ultimate control. They can choose how they’re perceived.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 08:26 AM
3

How are you deformed? I don’t get it.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 06:27 AM
3

I agree. Programming is difficult to undo.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 12:47 AM
16

How can it be for life? Can’t the child eliminate it at 18?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 03:40 AM
15

The enjoyment of someone’s personality lasts a lot longer than sex. Sex could be a couple hours, whereas personality could last the entire day or however long y’all are spending time together.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 10:42 PM
6

Look, man, yes it is harder, but don’t let it get you down. Play the hand you’re dealt and live life to the fullest, woman or no woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 09:08 AM
1

You have to basically out-alpha her. All the time. It will get you the girl, but could get exhausting after a whole. In other words, tease her hard. She obviously has to be physically attracted to you as well.
/r/seduction21/12/21 05:08 AM
1

It’s crazy, I can’t find perfect Virgin brides on dating apps either!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 05:01 AM
1

Just ask him if it’s cool to smash and go for it mang!
/r/seduction21/12/21 04:23 AM
1

There are two factors: seeing how your gf normally reacts and your masculine duty to protect her. Hang back initially to see how loyal she is; if she is loyal, then tell the guy to buzz off.
/r/seduction21/12/21 04:18 AM
2

Tease. Lightly make fun of her. Make double entendres.
/r/seduction20/12/21 05:48 AM
11

You’re totally right, the number of times that’s happened is totally equal to the number of times that’s happened to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 01:39 AM
5

It’s very simple. Media conditions people. What you see on media will inevitably seep down.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 12:05 AM
8

Women don’t approach, and on the rare occasions that they do, never have to deal with cruel rejections.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 09:45 PM
1

Lmao yeah, then she’s playing you. Assuming she’s not a good girl, and those are very rare.
/r/seduction19/12/21 02:20 AM
46

Unless she’s a good girl, she’s playing you. Simple. Are you paying more than her on dates?
/r/seduction18/12/21 08:45 AM
2

You’re probably attractive
/r/seduction18/12/21 03:43 AM
2

Where are these women who supposedly date the bums?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 03:31 AM
5

Just sounds like he was trying a power play on her honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 03:31 AM
1

It’s the same thing, just better. The same way talking to a friend in person is better than FaceTiming them. And most men do go without, OnlyFans and other sites have been booming.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 03:27 AM
1

Sure, your question was why most men can’t suffice. Many do, but it doesn’t mean they don’t want more.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 03:20 AM
1

Why cook a steak when you could buy a Big Mac at McDonalds? Because steaks are better, simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 02:59 AM
1

Hmmm interesting. I don’t buy that a nationwide charity couldn’t be set up but will agree they harass events.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 02:55 AM
1

It’s a combo. Simps teach a woman to be arrogant, society teaches them to be insecure. It’s why they’re rude to the simps but fall for the jerks, because jerks play on that insecurity.
/r/seduction18/12/21 02:54 AM
15

Women will have ever increasing options. Simps will multiply. Men will become more knowledgeable. Laws will increase women’s power; men’s behavior will be increasingly criminalized. Basically, all current trends will continue. Marriages will continue to decrease.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 02:29 AM
1

Lot more men than you know started out as Mr. Romantic and became jaded and disillusioned. Maybe hold some women accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 06:05 AM
4

Women use the hope strategy all the time. Get the foot in the door, hope it turns into more. They use it all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 05:53 AM
1

Bad personality and long history. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 05:41 AM
3

The sexual urge in men is simply stronger. It is a critical biological component for the furtherance of the species. It’s not about “intimacy”, it is simply part of being a man. It is one critical thing that drives them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 12:00 AM
1

Are you speaking from actual firsthand experience or knowledge? Isn’t the actual business of running one fundraising and engaging in PR campaigns?
/r/MensRights11/12/21 10:00 PM
1

How is that promoting bias against single men? It’s literally the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 09:09 AM
–

One thing’s for sure, you’re definitely a nerd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:58 AM
–

All of these terms are absolutely idiotic, I just use them because they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:58 AM
1

Lmao maybe it’s because I’ve been downvoted thousands of times, banned from subs, so I’ve never thought about or seen anyone care about votes, I’m sorry it’s just hilarious. And your whole post is bashing men, so I don’t really feel bad lol. Here, lemme crap a little more 🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:53 AM
5

An ideology created by the Democrats to incite hatred against men and create female voters.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:52 AM
1

How exactly do you “terrorize” a man from registering a non-profit? Lmao
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:52 AM
–

Absolutely absurd. A man being successful with women does not preclude him from a “HVW”, it makes him more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 04:44 AM
–

No, remember, it’s your fault, there’s many out there, you’re just a “LVM”.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 04:43 AM
3

Yeah, I think everyone should just accept life is unfair and move on. Resentment and bitterness is internally toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 04:42 AM
–

Lol the downvoting comment is hilarious 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 04:41 AM
1

That’s pretty wild if so. And honestly, that’s a huge indictment of the men’s rights movement. There’s nothing stopping them from registering a non-profit and raising donations.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:34 AM
1

It’s also stupid. Prostitution degrades women. Men would only be defeating themselves. Yes, they might be able to pay for sex, but that’s about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 02:00 AM
–

Yes, women are perfect marriage material goddesses, and there are plenty for every man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:59 AM
4

This all depends on if she likes you or not.
/r/seduction11/12/21 01:39 AM
–

Not for you, you seem to think there’s a plethora of relationship-material women out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:38 AM
–

Yes, that’s why I said the mentality between top-tier men and attractive women is far more similar than people think. And I don’t blame them. When you’re drowning in options, it’s a big temptation. Why only have one when you can sample them all? I personally think it’s short-sighted, but human nature is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:20 AM
–

Not necessarily, a lot of times even thots want love but are hopelessly confused and end up getting used.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:18 AM
–

I don’t even subscribe to “high value” or “low value”, maybe “relationship material” or not. But them being low value doesn’t make them wrong. We honestly don’t know how many relationship women are out there, according to divorce statistics, single motherhood, and out of wedlock births, one would guess very few.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:17 AM
2

Having a hot girlfriend or being good with women is good for status period. But generally I see more women actively resorting to incel-type insults as a reliable attack. It’s not really a man’s go-to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:02 AM
–

Yes, women never want to marry players or men who are successful with women. 🤪🤪🤪
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:59 AM
–

In other words, you totally disproved her theory lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:58 AM
–

Generally correct, but most men won’t say it, due to the predictable reactions below. Doesn’t mean other women have zero value, that’s just kind of many men’s ideal. “So other women are worthless?” incoherent feminist screeching
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:57 AM
–

There is a massive flaw in your logic. Many top tier men don’t want to settle down, not for a while. The majority of women they meet are not relationship material, but even if they meet one that is, they don’t really even want one. You gotta understand, many modern women and top tier men are actually the same: drowning in so much sexual abundance that they don’t really want just one. They only reluctantly abandon it due to circumstances, are, family, etc.. The “HV women” that you speak of may tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:52 AM
2

No, that’s why I’m saying it’s incredibly hard and a learned skill. You have to make it up on the spot using what’s happening in that moment. What she’s wearing, how she’s acting, what she does, literally anything. The real-time creation is what makes it exciting for her. The fact that it’s not scripted is what holds her in the moment. There is an electricity when someone is creating something on the spot and it is good. Learn this one skill and you are golden. This is the number one skill of se…
/r/seduction10/12/21 11:49 PM
2

Great study. Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 11:17 PM
1

That they don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 10:54 PM
7

The same way people should have compassion for women who “hit the wall”, they should have compassion for men who get bitter with this process. Knowing that they are reacting badly, but still treating them with empathy is the correct move. Anything else will only further polarize them. Personally, I think it’s much healthier for men to simply accept that life is unfair. Life goes on and it can still be enjoyable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 10:50 PM
2

You are correct that accepting that some things are unfair and just living your life is the best response. It’s also healthier.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 10:47 PM
1

Those are all very different. I would tell him that yes, the world is unfair, but giving in to bitterness is the worst response. You just have to accept it and try to live your best life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 10:45 PM
5

There’s a lot of bitter guys. I understand their circumstances, but bitterness is unhealthy in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:45 PM
2

I agree that a lot of men, especially in RP, come off as bitter. I neither ask women about their preferences nor complain. It’s quite obvious they prize physicality. I think men would do well to just accept it and live their life accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:44 PM
1

Nice, you should say that to women next time they complain about unequal pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:46 AM
2

This. This. This. Tease. Flirt. Roast. Play. These are all skills. Not talking about bullshit. Work on one skill: playfully roasting a girl. You’ll be amazed at the change once you master it. One of the core reasons this works on a psychological level is because it is infinite if done correctly; it is in the moment, it is spontaneous, it does not depend on finite topics which eventually run out. It is true magic because you are creating it in the moment versus saying rote canned opinions. Listen…
/r/seduction10/12/21 01:32 AM
2

Girls don’t wanna talk about “hobbies”, they want you to tease them and lightly make fun of them on the spot, in the moment. That is true game and very hard for most guys to do with the right tone and consistently. Girls find talking about shit very boring, they want to feel a dynamic.
/r/seduction10/12/21 01:29 AM
2

Sounds like your game is bad. Gotta be crisper, it sounds like you dawdle too much and they sense it.
/r/seduction10/12/21 01:27 AM
13

They lie so as not to decrease opportunities. Simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 12:59 AM
1

Men get paid less, you need a big hog, plus I heard ya gotta bang men too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 05:25 AM
1

Beta males are by definition stupid. Of course anything they do would backfire.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 02:34 AM
1

You invalidated men’s lived experiences and are now trying to weasel out by saying they never “enjoyed” it. That’s not what I’m saying at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 01:18 AM
0

Are you able to understand the concept that a woman can enjoy sleeping with one man, and yet enjoy sleeping with another man 10X more? That they are both enjoyment, just on a spectrum?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 01:17 AM
1

It happens naturally. Desire exists on a physical, animalistic, primitive level. It’s not that she “doesn’t want to do things that she enjoys”, it’s that with the top athletic guy, she naturally wants to do it. And it’s not “things she enjoys”, many times we’re talking about things that he enjoys.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 01:04 AM
1

I never used the word unlocked. A modern woman’s proclivity for sexual adventure/experimentation is directly proportional to how attractive she finds the man or how badly she wants something from him. Personally, I think it is a mix. I think the modern woman both finds the elite athlete highly sexually arousing and wants to please him. She knows he’s in high demand. Some of these girls look at it like they’re competing in a championship. The nerd or just the average guy with maybe a good job, se…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 01:01 AM
1

Breaking news: women have sex for lots of reasons. Pure, wild, animalistic desire is just one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 12:54 AM
1

Women have sex for a lot of reasons. Some guys absolutely drive their arousal meter into overdrive; some are just cute. Some tick off a lot of boxes as good relationship material, don’t necessarily disgust her, but don’t move the needle at all. The guy that drives her arousal into overdrive naturally unlocks inhibitions and gets expanded behaviors. It just happens naturally. The others get kind of a more standard fare. It exists on a spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 12:47 AM
1

A situation where a woman does more sexually for a top tier athletic guy versus an average man is “pretty irrational” and “doesn’t happen very often”. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 12:31 AM
1

I love how the concept of sexual enthusiasm existing on a spectrum based specifically on the mate is somehow a foreign concept to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 12:30 AM
2

They just want the power. It’s just about disempowering men and putting them in more of a “worker bee” grunt type role. Blue collar work is fine for them. They just don’t want pro-male advocates in the power centers; academia, media, politics.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 12:14 AM
-1

Honestly, I think you would be better off trying to get one longterm good woman. Better return.
/r/seduction09/12/21 12:12 AM
1

Are there no men’s legal aid charities or organizations?
/r/MensRights09/12/21 12:02 AM
2

Why are you asking why? Democratic ideologies are structured as morality plays. Good or evil. Whereas most political ideologies are usually “hey, I think government could work better this way”. Democratic political strategists intentionally designed their political beliefs this way. It means adherents or believers will naturally see anyone who disagrees as evil. It is a powerful emotional reaction. That’s why. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter, because I believe most Republican men play down their b…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 10:46 PM
2

Yes, this idea that men should just die alone is insane.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 08:54 PM
1

Yes, but those are all derivative reasons. As in, their high body count may indicate some other undesirable quality, or you worried how you would be “perceived” for sleeping with them. It’s totally different for men. The count itself is important. Not even for the additional qualities it may indicate, but for the fact itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:46 PM
1

The market is severely distorted. It is what it is. Either overpay or live your own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:38 PM
8

The idea that marriage is 100% a bad idea is moronic. Under the right circumstances, if a man really trusts his partner and takes some precautions, it can work out. Are there still risks? Hell yes. But this idea that men should just totally forgo marriage and having children of their own and just die out is a terrible, unworkable solution. Vet your partner really well, see if you trust them, and take a chance.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 11:01 PM
1

It’s not that they want him because others want him. That part is just confirmation to them. They want him because he’s athletic, good looking, charismatic, etc…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 10:52 PM
16

High body count is not as important to a woman. Fact. Like it’s a literal fact. Read any women’s forums and see how many complain about a man’s sexual past. Are there some women out there who really care about it? Sure, but not as much as most all men will.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 10:48 PM
31

Most men grow up with some idealized view of women. RP, as clumsy as it is, is the only thing that allows them to not become chumps and suckers. It’s the only thing that tells them to be somewhat on their guard. Most men automatically become RP by default after some particularly traumatic divorce / cheating, because the scales fall from their eyes, which in itself tells you something.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 10:44 PM
1

My idea of courtship is not trying to bang a girl as fast as humanly possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 06:37 AM
7

It’s pretty sad dude. Think about what effect that has on men. Then women wonder why there’s so many men out there who will try to smash immediately. It’s called conditioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 06:26 AM
1

Thanks for the post. Have you talked to him?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:07 AM
10

I believe she is a judge there. There is a high likelihood she gets full custody.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:47 AM
6

Yeah I’ve known multiple girls who would literally lose respect for you if you did not try to bang them immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 05:37 AM
7

They are under constant attack. Few will have the luxury of a platform. So most will have to create their own domain, website, coding, etc..
/r/MensRights24/11/21 05:05 AM
-1

Just say “wanna chilll
/r/seduction24/11/21 04:58 AM
3

You only move on if she’s not interested. Look, take your best shot and let the chips fall. Don’t sabotage yourself.
/r/seduction24/11/21 04:31 AM
4

It’s because of foreign subversion.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/21 04:17 AM
6

You sounded discouraged. If you want to help them, you have to deprogram them, which is very hard.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:25 AM
1

I mean, if a girl already has a dude to bang and get emotional fulfillment from, I imagine it relieves a ton of motivation to actually look for a guy. So it could be a self-fulfilling prophecy. From a guys perspective, it’s attractive for a FWB, but unattractive for a relationship. But you “accepted” that at 23?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 10:15 AM
1

I mean, you’re in a relationship, just a contemporary one. He’s probably getting a little bit better of a deal, but I’m sure you’re benefiting as well. As for what I imagined, eh, just kind of a good girl pining away for her man, saving herself. I used to be a romantic and imagine those kinds of girls existed lmao. I could have negative opinions about your setup, but honestly who gives a fuck about hearing my opinion and what business is it of mine? None. Nobody should give you any flak for thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 10:00 AM
5

They’re indoctrinated OP. Think of them like Jehovah’s witnesses.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 09:53 AM
2

Ah ok yeah, so basically a relationship by today’s standards. 12 years, shit. Definitely a different picture from what I initially envisioned, but you do you girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:43 AM
8

It’s an entire adult genre, some of the most racist shit ever is out there. And no one says a peep.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/11/21 09:33 AM
1

Of course it colors your perspective, just like my beliefs color mine. I don’t necessarily want to get into a debate about Christianity, since most people you’re talking about probably subscribe to 500-year old invented versions of a 2000-year old religion. There is no such thing as denominations, there was one version for 1,000 years, they had a schism between the Orthodox and Catholic, but still generally stayed the same, and then had an explosion of fake new versions after Martin Luther. Most…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:10 AM
1

Just do the chicken dance, that really projects confidence
/r/seduction22/11/21 01:34 AM
2

Thanks lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 01:28 AM
1

Yeah, I imagine your atheism probably colors your perspectives now. I had a similar background and many of my siblings have bitter views towards the religion they grew up with. I don’t. I think Roosh is genuine and he has said that he considers his time spent philandering wasted. The death of his sister changed his thinking on many things. You sound like you have some hardness in some areas, so I have a general idea of your viewpoints vis a vis religion and it’s adherents.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 01:27 AM
1

He doesn’t claim to be a good person, actually the opposite, but your thinking makes more sense if you’re an atheist.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 08:27 AM
1

Lol why you hating on my boy Roosh? He’s become a man of God now. I guess we’ll just have to disagree, I think high partners definitely has some type of a psychological effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 08:07 AM
1

Have you ever heard of the thousand c*ck stare? By your logic, the woman would already have it before her dalliances. As men, we know this is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 07:47 AM
1

Do you believe that men or women’s ability to emotionally/mentally/spiritually bond decreases the more casual partners they have?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 07:32 AM
2

Yes, there is definitely something wrong with it. Many find it extremely unfulfilling in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 07:23 AM
2

Yeah, I was going to say the only exceptions are men who have been programmed to only want sex. It’s hard for me as a man to know what percentage that is, women will naturally say all men are pigs, but I figure it’s some percentage. I assumed that the more average men who don’t get as much play would value relationships more, hmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 09:12 PM
7

This is kind of stupid. I don’t even know what “average” means - if a girl is actually a “good woman”, character wise, and has relationship skills, her looks aren’t as important. Red pill is obsessed with looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 09:09 PM
1

It’s not actually real, I’m saying that’s the obvious play if she teases you, psychologically she expects you to be defensive and say you’re actually not young, going the other way is unexpected and demonstrates fearlessness.
/r/seduction20/11/21 09:07 PM
23

The reason most Modern Women can’t get relationship attention is because a) they’ve coasted on only offering sex, b) they never developed relationship skills, c) their egos are super inflated from all the sexual attention. In the modern dating market, women don’t need to have relationship skills. But this also means when they finally try to get one, they don’t know why it’s not working. Keep in mind I am talking about the Modern Woman archetype, which is a very specific state of mind and a set o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 10:48 AM
7

If they left because you wouldn’t bang, then that means they a) just wanted to smash you, and b) were possibly out of your relationship league. A person in your relationship league would wait for you assuming you are actually a good girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 10:46 AM
4

Redpill goes too far the other way. And it has flaws. And it ropes in men who have been wronged for much of their lives and are bitter about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 09:44 AM
3

If you waited 6 months, she wouldn’t have cared.
/r/seduction20/11/21 09:37 AM
1

You decide what box you’re put in. Thing is lot of women don’t even know there are two boxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 09:27 AM
1

You play it extreme, if she tries to tease you, you tease her back and say something like she’s a milf or a gilf.
/r/seduction20/11/21 08:53 AM
2

Thank you, if I had the ability, I would try to hammer it into the manosphere, because their flawed theory actually discredits them, alienates people, and teaches their followers that no “good women” exist, but alas, I am only one man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 03:42 AM
1

There’s many programs. Pro-promiscuity, delaying marriage, the supremacy of the ego, female superiority, hatred towards men, female victimhood and resentment, they’re endless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 10:04 PM
2

Well, I think the redpill theory is an incredibly clumsy attempt to describe a very real phenomenon. One of their biggest errors is ascribing to innate female nature what is actually external psychological programming. But because there are so many strands of the programming, it’s very hard to find someone who has rejected them all. This happens to men too, we are targeted with programming as well. This is why I say the same song is playing, just at different volumes. To be able to see all of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 10:01 PM
1

Most rappers nowadays need very little talent, especially if you’re not trying to make it a career. Music is ideal because it creates an emotional connection, plus women love that vibe and clout.
/r/seduction18/11/21 06:00 AM
12

The premise is wrong because the programming exists on a spectrum; every girl can be singing the same song, but some sing it much louder than others. It’s because the programming has seeped into almost every single one. Only exceptions are women who don’t engage with culture and as such do not get programmed by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:57 AM
1

You said you’re about 6 feet and buff. For guys who aren’t naturally attractive, building clout or fame, especially via artistry, is one way to build attraction.
/r/seduction17/11/21 08:18 PM
1

The worst part is they can’t raise interest rates. Which means we will slowly bankrupt the American people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 06:34 AM
53

Remember, she’s either a whore or a prude! There’s no in between! 🤪🤪🤪
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 06:30 AM
1

Women are smarter in certain areas, like social skills. Empathy, psychological areas, perhaps. Men and women are different. I personally think the biological reasons given by red-pillers for why women do things are idiotic and the reason is much simpler: we’re human and do human things. Do women like big buff guys for pure physical, sexual reasons? Well duh, we all like attractive people. You don’t have to reach back to the fucking Stone Age to explain that. As for society now and why things hap…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 11:29 PM
2

Yes, you must dance like a monkey. Many men can’t sustain this energy, hence the many short term flings.
/r/seduction16/11/21 06:45 PM
1

Currency was depreciated lowering purchasing power, prices were raised in almost every sector through punitive laws, industries were monopolized, and high value jobs were exported. Manufacturing jobs used to be the lifeline for blue collar men. We eliminated them, devalued the currency, and inflated prices for healthcare and education and then said “Bad capitalism!” It’s like people forget we had capitalism for 200 years and it worked perfectly fine. One of the biggest attacks on the working cla…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 06:07 PM
1

If you’re nervous, a girl will feel it. Work on just being calm and easy. At least you’ll have a chance then.
/r/seduction16/11/21 09:06 AM
1

Sigh. This has nothing to do with capitalism. Do you think we were socialist in 1950? Capitalism worked fine. It was sabotaged starting around 1960. It has only gotten worse. The currency has been depreciated drastically. And yes, all of this has made traditionalism almost impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 09:05 AM
1

Going after the other 80% of men. Pretty obvious. This is why the value is so overinflated right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 03:07 AM
0

If you link it to me, I could see. But a lot of men settle by getting with the former party girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 04:58 AM
0

No offense, but I just really don’t have the strength to explain obvious stuff. Especially when you say you’ve never seen women complain about having to settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 04:50 AM
3

You think the problem is “sexless men”. I think that’s just a symptom - the real problem is an unequal distribution of pairing up among the sexes. And this happens because women, in general, chase the top men out of their league. This is why, in 30s, you hear women complaining about “having to settle”. And the only reason women are able to access men who were previously out of their league is because they’re now offering sex. This was not happening pre-1960’s and pre-pill. So we now have an extr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 12:35 AM
3

Say it enough times and it will be true lady. Then go read the billions of posts by women wondering “what happened to dating” in their 30s and 40s. This is a very real mindset that exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 12:09 AM
0

I’m talking about 22-year olds drowning in options. Just observe some of them sometimes and you can tell they think the gravy train won’t end.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:58 PM
3

Who is “we”? Delaying marriage is a recent invention of the past 60 years by Marxists who wanted to divide the sexes for political gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:30 PM
2

You’re not doing anything. Your only goal is to try to discredit the data some have posted. Men don’t really care - we have tens of thousands of cumulative interactions as data points. We don’t even need an OKC study or some graph. You don’t propose an alternate theory because you know it has no chance - your only goal here is to try to cast doubt on this theory, perhaps to salve your wounded soul.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:28 PM
10

No, you see, you must dance harder, monkey! Dance! Be a REAL man!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:26 PM
5

The thing that very few men will say is that modern women are simply not relationship material. There’s nothing for men to do. To change it would require gaining control over all cultural programming institutions and even then you would only see changes in the next 15-20 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:23 PM
10

So hilarious how her whole post is basically just trying to tear the theory down, when thousands of men’s lived experiences say otherwise. Nor does she even attempt to offer an alternative theory, probably because she knows it would be annihilated. Lady, when you have no agenda, what is going on is very clear. Girls just want to have fun. They want to marry - someday. They just don’t realize the guys they like don’t want to marry them and they don’t realize their power fades, until very late in …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:12 PM
2

Nah, just you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 10:47 PM
1

Much more nuanced than that. I’ve read your posts and you have a predetermined view.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 10:41 PM
1

I dunno about all that, it could be because they’re more social and need that community more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 10:41 PM
1

That’s literally what you’re implying in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 10:40 PM
2

How is it disgusting? It degrades the man and he generally regrets it later on.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:58 AM
1

Has nothing to do with property. Men have two attractions: physical and mental. Sometimes the physical overrides the mental and they can still bang a girl whose personality they do not like. I’ve noticed that women tend to combine the mental and physical into one attraction though, at least in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:57 AM
3

Doesn’t have anything to do with rape. It has to do with the male reproductive urge / lust overriding the personal repulsion. There’s guys that can’t stand some women’s personalities, but still think they’re hot. It’s not complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:52 AM
2

It’s an odd kind of racist paternalism, where they assume any Asian woman is a moron who can’t make decisions for herself. Then they attack them for marrying for financial motives, as if that doesn’t exist in the West! Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:46 AM
2

Remember, according to these ladies, Asian women are just dumb weak powerless women, easily controlled by those big bad western men. They have no agency and can’t make decisions for themselves; only these enlightened Western women can do that! And remember, western women never marry for financial motives either! No, it’s always for love! They are so noble! 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:45 AM
6

You have it backwards. Women are the largest consumers of antidepressants. They take being single much worse than men. Also, one could argue they need their social network because of loneliness and sometimes don’t even like their friends. Men can handle loneliness much better. And men have always died before women, that has nothing to do with relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:40 AM
7

Lmao I love people that demand I educate them. Have you ever looked at any stats? Divorce stats? The stats that 30% of young men are virgins? The stats on children being born to single parent households? Illegitimacy rates are through the roof, most marriages don’t last, many men will make it to 30 woefully inexperienced, this is all common knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:01 AM
5

Longterm, lasting, and fulfilling ones? By and large, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:51 AM
4

Dang
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:49 AM
9

Roosh is celibate lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:49 AM
0

I dunno if I’m red pill, but loyalty. Discernment. Cooking skills. Femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:48 AM
7

I’ve seen this. What’s really disgusting is then when they’re told they’re privileged.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:47 AM
8

“If you’re not unattractive” Lmao so if you’re attractive AND have a great personality? Many men are just average, not ugly, just average. And there’s a lot of good men who have just normal personalities. That’s the vast majority. That’s who I’m talking about. Not the minority you’re describing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:39 AM
3

This is what happens with most girls. They go through like a 10-year cycle of “dating” attractive, charismatic guys. He puts on show, smash, disappear. Maybe reappear a month or three later for a booty call. She tells herself they have a thing. This goes on and on. The top guys are very charismatic and fun to be around. The thing is, the longterm guys usually aren’t like that. For one, they don’t have a short term goal. “Performing” like that is actually quite exhausting. Guys can only do it for…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:37 AM
4

They come in with the goal of banging. For guys at that point, it’s like a show. They put on a performance. Perform, achieve the goal, leave. If you want a relationship, you want real, not fake. You won’t get the same show. You might not even get the same caliber guy. In fact, you almost definitely won’t. The guy who’s in it for the long haul doesn’t put on that kind of show. What you want to do is weed out the performers. Tell men you’re looking for longterm. And stick to it. No sex until you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:27 AM
10

No offense, but you’re not a man, so you literally cannot make that statement. And it’s wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:21 AM
10

I mean, I don’t blame them, it’s a rigged game and most will be losers. It’s a rough life for many. I can just see that giving in to bitterness consumes you and only hurts your life more than affecting anyone else. But for some people, it’s all they have. Anger can warm the heart in a destructive sort of way, but it can give people power. You have to keep in mind for many of these people, they will live and die without having a long, solid, loving relationship. So while I think they’re making a …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:12 AM
39

She’s ruined. Someone warn the poor sap. Doubtful she’ll ever be able to have a normal relationship.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/11/21 07:01 AM
9

There is no endgame. We’ll just continue this trend of a highly bifurcated dating society. The problem many of the redpillers or MRAs make is getting bitter instead of just stop caring. So they’re angry, but still men, so still try to smash women they meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:50 AM
1

Hot girls or most girls in general already have supreme confidence. Most likely it was his awkwardness that bothered her more.
/r/seduction14/11/21 06:41 AM
1

Look, I’m not saying you can’t take time for yourself every now and then if you need it. But in general, if you like a man, show him respect. That’s what they need.
/r/RedPillWomen14/11/21 06:37 AM
1

If it’s in America, good luck. All I can say is develop a musical career.
/r/seduction14/11/21 06:35 AM
5

They do exist, but I just think the optics are on OP’s side.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 06:24 AM
2

You have to remember there’s nothing making men delusional, at least in dating. They’re reminded of harsh reality. That’s not the same on the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 11:20 PM
1

You should post actual guys reviews of you instead of your own analysis.
/r/RedPillWomen13/11/21 11:07 PM
1

No, there’s a lot of countries / cultures where personality / values matter more. They’re usually poorer countries, because poverty makes people humble. Yes, you may have to avoid some gold digging there, but it’s not everywhere.
/r/seduction13/11/21 11:00 PM
1

I know. I’m saying leave western materialistic cultures. That’s the only solution if you’re average looking.
/r/seduction13/11/21 10:57 PM
1

You admitted it. You straight up admitted you’re a sexist. Gross. You should be ashamed of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 10:51 PM
1

You have to go to a less materialistic culture then and one where they value personality more.
/r/seduction13/11/21 10:50 PM
9

I think you’re looking at it wrong. Having children is important to YOU. You also have a shorter timetable. If you miss your window, it may never happen. Therefore you have to be incredibly ruthless with your time. If you have to break up with him, it could take years to find a man, get engaged, etc.. Those are your non negotiables. If he doesn’t give you your non negotiables, you move on. This isn’t some small thing. It’s a major thing. And it sounds like he isn’t respecting it, spending his mo…
/r/RedPillWomen13/11/21 10:40 PM
12

It would be pretty hard to get attacked for wanting a club if you can’t join the women’s.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 10:08 PM
2

Threaten to sue. It’s blatantly illegal. They’re used to just pushing guys around and most would give up at this stage.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 10:07 PM
1

Gross, so you’re admitting you’re a sexist? That disqualifies you from discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 06:39 AM
1

You sound pretty sexist against Egyptian men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 05:52 AM
1

Open a history book and find out what traditional women did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 05:50 AM
1

Is this a joke?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 05:45 AM
3

All virgins do this. It’s irrelevant. All virgins think the girl can tell. She won’t, unless you’re super awkward about it. After the first, you won’t even think about it anymore. It’s super easy - show them a nice time, make sure they’re having fun, and when the time is right, invite them to chill some more. Some will, some won’t, but it’s not complex.
/r/seduction09/11/21 10:22 AM
14

He drove 2 hours. They had an appointment. Her bailing is disrespect. It’s a slap in the face. And if a woman disrespects you in a relationship it’s basically over.
/r/RedPillWomen09/11/21 10:20 AM
5

Well you don’t care anyways, so why this thread. After reading that post, I def wouldn’t care anymore if I was him.
/r/RedPillWomen09/11/21 10:18 AM
4

If you want long-term potential with him, make him a priority. Otherwise, you’ll be seen as many other girls who treat guys as expendable: not special, not unique, not long-term material.
/r/RedPillWomen09/11/21 10:17 AM
6

Tell your manager the truth: that she’s a sexist.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 09:51 AM
13

Not if she does traditional things
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 09:31 AM
3

It’s not complex dude. Being a virgin is irrelevant. Meet a girl, make her feel nice, dance, have fun, gauge her mood, invite her to your place. Bang. It’s that easy. You’re overthinking it. Sounds like you’re already attractive. Just give them a fun night and they’ll smash.
/r/seduction09/11/21 09:24 AM
-2

In America the men are ashamed of their women. In Egypt I imagine that’s not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 09:18 AM
12

Hey remember when the Ohio shooter was an Antifa member and Reddit member? Remember those articles linking him to leftist subs? Neither do I, because they don’t exist. They have no principles. They want to ban you because they’re fascists. Period.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 09:00 AM
1

Such a moronic and insulting statement - people form habits for all kinds of reasons. Positive feedback is a huge reason. I love how they just arrogantly tell you how to feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 12:12 AM
1

You didn’t answer? How would Cardi appeal to men MORE? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 12:05 AM
1

The point is that it bothers you, not that you are one. You’re a smart cookie, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 08:40 PM
1

Lmaoooooo like what? More clothes? Less ass shaking? Less sex content? Literally laughable that you believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 08:38 PM
1

Yes, women have iron willpower and removing the positive feedback loop would have absolutely no effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 08:37 PM
3

You’re literally making my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 08:36 PM
8

She sounds insane.
/r/RedPillWomen03/11/21 06:39 AM
1

You don’t give a shit about being slut shamed so much that you wrote an entire post about it and can’t shut up about it. Totally unbothered.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 06:36 AM
0

Denying a woman’s lived experience. Nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 06:34 AM
5

Yes, Cardi is singing it for her sheer love of threesomes and not because it profits off of male lust. The utter delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 06:34 AM
1

Female victimhood is an eternal ideology encouraged by the Democratic Party. It never ends because it’s not designed to. The problem is they have to reach further and further back to keep feeling like a victim. It’s why posts like these look so ludicrous and pathetic. Get a hold of yourself, lady, you sound like a whining little baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 06:32 AM
1

Well I agree that giving up is not the solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 07:43 PM
18

A lot of girls have confidence before they bang because they perceive it as their source of power. Afterward, they feel naked in a sense. It’s the pitfalls of centering your strength from your sexual power.
/r/seduction02/11/21 09:32 AM
1

Oh, I had no idea I was wrong. Clearly women don’t have problems finding lots of young, athletic, attractive men then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 08:57 AM
1

It’s not true? You know a lot of kids who don’t play at all and then become athletes in high school?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 08:53 AM
2

It’s not immediate, kids are generally acclimated into that culture, if a kid hasn’t been on that track by the time he hits junior high/high, it probably isn’t happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 08:42 AM
1

Who are you telling? My original comment was pointing out a flaw in her logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 08:25 AM
2

Congrats on the sex man!
/r/seduction02/11/21 06:19 AM
16

Not caring and taking a shot. Great mindset.
/r/seduction02/11/21 05:38 AM
13

We rearranged the entire education system to favor women and disfavor men, isn’t this terrible for women now?
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:28 AM
4

How many people here think an article would ever be written on women with “Golden Vagina Syndrome” and how they’re unmarriageable?
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:27 AM
2

Except Achilles had a society that would recognize his honor. We don’t. Society actively denigrates masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:20 AM
5

I’m assuming you’re a woman. Family is what men used to fight for. The reason many men are dropping out is because they have no chance at a wife, and thus family.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:03 AM
1

Plates, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:01 AM
3

Where? Masculinity is denigrated. Society certainly won’t give him glory.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 04:56 AM
1

Lol the man-haters just out themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 04:55 AM
30

This is the correct answer, she thinks you’re a good lay, but has many other options.
/r/seduction01/11/21 07:50 PM
9

What is the incentive for men? What is the reward to look forward to? Genuine question.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:35 PM
1

You didn’t think much of sleeping in your “friend”’s bed? Didn’t think much? DIDN’T THINK MUCH?
/r/seduction01/11/21 06:30 PM
3

Lmao points for ambition
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 05:29 PM
6

Then that’s gross and manipulative. It’s a rude thing to say. OP should just walk away.
/r/seduction01/11/21 05:26 PM
1

Dating is about respect. The minute a girl disrespects you pull back. Immediately.
/r/seduction01/11/21 09:01 AM
2

You need a simple binary test to gauge interest: ask her to do something together, and not walk around. A legit activity.
/r/seduction01/11/21 08:58 AM
3

I mean look, the way I see it is, you want to nail the mental/emotional/intellectual/spiritual connection first. Then build the sexual connection on top of it. So many girls do the sexual connection first and then wonder why the guy left. Well it’s simple, because you didn’t build the other one, so there was nothing holding you together. And the emotional / spiritual one takes time. It grows slowly. It comes from doing things together and sharing experiences. That’s what courtship used to be. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 08:51 AM
2

It’s hard to say without knowing the type of guy, does he have lots of experience / low experience? Does he want a relationship/ hookup? If he’s a player, he’s probably looking to smash and run. If he has no experience, he’s probably grateful either way. If he’s just a genuinely good guy, a connection is probably more important. Why the obsession over rushing it? Do you wanna bang him? Has he grumbled? This stuff should just flow naturally, I don’t understand your concern over the timetable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 08:29 AM
2

I mean I doubt she wanted “rough”, maybe some hair pulling or ass slapping. But I think my point is it’s better to err on the side of being too stingy with sex than being too free with it. One will get you immediately disqualified, while the other will just get some grumbling maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 08:18 AM
4

I think you totally misunderstood my story. The guy refused to bang the girl dirty and they’re still together, married and thriving. I assume they just make sweet sweet missionary love. My point is that I believe sex is actually almost meaningless in longterm relationships or marriages and recedes in the distance. Obviously men will still desire it, but it simply becomes less important.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 08:04 AM
1

Need more info. You have given zero info. Give as much info as possible.
/r/seduction01/11/21 08:02 AM
6

Is this serious? Just terrible
/r/seduction01/11/21 07:48 AM
6

There are a million valid reasons for why men feel that way. Many have to do with selecting a good mother. Studies have shown that the higher number of partners a woman has, the shorter the relationship lasts. Promiscuity is also sometimes a sign of high impulsivity. Men absolutely SHOULD look for women who will forge strong bonds with them and not be impulsive as potential mothers, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. If you sleep with a guy on the first/second/third date, he assumes yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:47 AM
3

“Madonna whore complex”, while being the most overused phrase on this site by people who think they’re saying something incredibly brilliant, is a very real and actual thing. I knew a girl who wanted her partner to give it to her raw, real and dirty. He would not do it in that style as he had too much respect for her. Her friend, meanwhile, was indeed receiving that from yours truly. Guess which one was married. The one sometimes complaining about sex, they’re still going strong, and have two ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:34 AM
3

Generally speaking, the sooner you give it up, the less you’ll be viewed as relationship material. So I would honestly wait as long as possible. This also weeds out guys only looking to smash. Of course, this also assumes you’re not a ho playing the role of a good girl. While I can usually see through it, a lot of guys can’t, so I guess you’re fine either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:25 AM
3

So you want to be in a relationship for at least 7 years and then get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:20 AM
2

Depends on if you want sex or marriage from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:16 AM
1

Oh yeah, none of this is changing soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:04 AM
6

Lmao “Obama never talked about race” 🤣🤣🤣
/r/seduction01/11/21 06:58 AM
12

No, it means improving your appearance incurs immediate benefits for the woman (attention, compliments, dates, etc..) This leads to a positive feedback loop and they create a habit. Unless you are a true specimen as a man, such as athletes perhaps, you will not receive that same psychological affirmation. It is a solitary exercise for the most part. No positive loop is created. You have to maintain the habit through sheer will alone. Without a tangible reward, few have that willpower. So the foo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 06:53 AM
1

Depends on a) how hot you are, b) how hot you are in relation to her, and c) yes, how socially tuned she is to properly discern your vibe.
/r/seduction01/11/21 05:58 AM
2

This is what you call friendzoning so hard you bust through the wall and come out the other side into the fuckzone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 05:20 AM
1

Your math sounds about right lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 04:56 AM
9

Because there is a much higher chance that she will bond stronger with you.
/r/RedPillWomen01/11/21 04:27 AM
1

No I know, there’s a female comedian who said it once. I thought it was silly until I saw this lmao
/r/seduction01/11/21 04:04 AM
1

I watched Searching For Bobby Fischer recently and was amazed that it was present even back then. The father is an arrogant man who traumatizes his son to win chess, while the mother is the wise, smirking all knowing figure, protecting her son from his over-competitive father and coach, at one point even threatening divorce and taking his child away in order to bend the father to her will. I was stunned. They were teaching women to use that as leverage in marriage. Of course it’s 10X worse nowad…
/r/MensRights01/11/21 04:03 AM
6

Well here’s the truth. You may only have a 5% chance of meeting a nice girl who’s into you, but you have a 0% chance if you don’t believe in yourself. Stop being down on yourself and at least grab that 5% chance.
/r/seduction01/11/21 04:00 AM
10

Lol who has the joke that guys remember that one compliment for years
/r/seduction01/11/21 03:51 AM
1

Silly rabbit - virgins don’t exist anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 03:43 AM
1

Getting a loyal wife without a history.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 03:22 AM
-1

Buy a boat and move to florida
/r/seduction01/11/21 02:59 AM
2

“She wants the D!!!”
/r/seduction01/11/21 02:12 AM
1

Right, but the reason is because he was nervous. He literally wanted to hang out with her and was so nervous he self-sabotaged.
/r/seduction31/10/21 11:51 PM
-3

Text her “thanks for the sex”
/r/seduction31/10/21 07:43 PM
4

Why? Way too complex to answer. Because there is a massive political operation that involves constituency demographic groups and women are one of them.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 07:41 PM
1

That’s… not why men don’t want to date HBC women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 06:35 PM
32

You’re missing the point. 100% of women are incentivized to improve their appearance because they receive immediate positive feedback. 80% of men are not, so they stop. Then this increases the imbalance.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 06:28 PM
0

Right, he was in a begging/pleasing dynamic then, extremely unattractive.
/r/seduction31/10/21 06:18 PM
4

The thing is he’s not an asshole or witty, he’s just nervous around women and uses rudeness as a defense mechanism. If you’re extremely confident, sometimes being an asshole can work. He’s neither.
/r/seduction31/10/21 06:14 PM
6

I think he’s incredibly nervous in some situations and uses rhetorical over-aggression as a defense mechanism. You can tell he’s way overthinking his comebacks.
/r/seduction31/10/21 06:12 PM
2

Possible as well. I suppose I’m just thinking of my own personal experiences where I’d be immediately turned off in such a situation and would mentally disengage lol
/r/seduction31/10/21 06:09 PM
2

Do you have a better argument than “nOt aLl wOmEn wErE mArRiEd” or is that it? The overall point is it was far, far easier for a woman to find a husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 06:07 PM
24

It means they’re not over them. They see you as their female best friend and are venting.
/r/seduction31/10/21 06:23 AM
4

The critical flaw in red pill ideology is thinking modern female nature is innate female nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 05:55 AM
-2

In general, lying to string a girl along is scummy, yes. But we’re ignoring how women even got to this point - 70 years ago most women were guaranteed a husband. Now many can waste their key years trying desperately to get one. Women have not gained power, they’ve lost it, and nobody seems to talk about why.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 05:51 AM
20

Yes, 100%. A lot of times when a girl is coming up to you, it’s a layup. Wit means being able to make her laugh or be amused, not be offended. If you can’t do that, just be cool. The reason she walked away is not because you offended her, it’s because your response told her you’re inexperienced and not able to handle her. A lot of the time, being successful with a girl is just not fucking it up. As such, say less. Say whatever the minimum is to keep her interested and keep things moving.
/r/seduction31/10/21 04:59 AM
209

Here’s a good rule: if you’re not quick-witted or can’t think of anything clever, always go with nice. Just something super simple and nice: “thanks a lot, you’re cute too”. If she already likes you, she won’t hold your lame game against you that much. You just need to not fuck it up, and being nice and chill will usually accomplish that. A lot of the time, if a girl is really into you, she’ll steer the convo too, and all you gotta do is volley back.
/r/seduction31/10/21 04:36 AM
1

The sad truth is if a girl likes you, most of them will want you to make a move. If you don’t, they lose respect for you. Seen it a million times.
/r/seduction31/10/21 03:57 AM
1

Means she’s generally attracted to guys who treat her poorly, if you can play that guy sure, personally I never could.
/r/seduction31/10/21 03:47 AM
8

Yes, women like a full head of hair. Having less hurts you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:45 AM
5

The “skidmarks” is a big giveaway, I’m surprised you didn’t use “scrotes” as well
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:16 AM
1

I’m assuming you wear the strapon in your relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:11 AM
3

You can thank feminism for that. Before sexual liberation, you got husbands. Now you give it all away for free and hope desperately you don’t run out of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:11 AM
1

Happens all the time, my friend. The MGTOW’s like to fantasize that every rider hits the wall, but the truth is more than you think nail the transition from party lifestyle to sucker
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:09 AM
4

If he waits around for his crumbs, doesn’t discern her past, and then puts a ring on it, he is the beta bux
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:51 AM
1

You have a masculine or mercenary mindset, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:49 AM
8

Doesn’t disprove my statement, but congratulations
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:49 AM
0

Women don’t care. When some of them say it’s disgusting, what they mean is they’re threatened because of your experience. For marriage, they’d prefer a chump with very low experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:47 AM
4

A woman hangs around for 5/6/7 years and it’s the man’s fault? Is she a big girl?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:45 AM
4

It’s literally laughable. Imagine if I said to girls in their 20’s, “how dare you not marry me when I want to!”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:00 AM
4

Most girls strategy is Hope. Put sex coins in the Hope machine and hope a marriage falls out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:55 AM
3

Absolutely zero females think like this
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:54 AM
7

They hold out on the marriage guy for only one reason: so he doesn’t think she’s easy. Who tf are we kidding
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:54 AM
1

Ah, the privilege of a woman being able to call someone pathetic for wanting more after sex. Just imagine if a guy said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:53 AM
12

Lmao I love honest responses like this. Shows why guys should never marry a woman like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:52 AM
8

Lots of women want to have casual sex on their timetable. They just get angry when men don’t want to get married on their timetable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:51 AM
9

No, you see, it’s always the man’s fault, even when he doesn’t propose after 17 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:50 AM
6

Argh! That’s crazy bro! Almost like women are equal to men and have their own brains and can make big girl decisions!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:49 AM
3

Spot the FDS member
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:48 AM
2

Tinder is the worst deal primarily because you’re competing with massive amounts of people. Bob in the neighborhood has low competition.
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:58 PM
1

I hope you assert yourself more in your personal dating life and find a backbone, soft, compliant and submissive is no way to go through life.
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:53 PM
1

iM tOtAlLY uNnAfFeCted
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:45 PM
1

What truth? That you got your panties in a bundle when I challenged your soft submissive dating philosophy??
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:41 PM
5

Just means he wants to fuck around.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 09:41 PM
1

Somebody is very sensitive and defensive. Living your life by following somebody else is a terrible and unpredictable way to live. In addition, it will turn many women off. I’m sorry your passive, submissive style was criticized and you got your fee fee’s hurt.
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:23 PM
8

This is bad strategy. You escalated by giving number. Now if she texts and you’re not attracted, it’s gonna be weird for her. 2/10
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:21 PM
1

I see you have comprehension problems. I’ll repeat it slowly: Never slavishly obey a woman’s directions. Text her when you want to. And you do this because it’s the right thing to do. Hopefully I spoke slower this time for you.
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:14 PM
2

The problem is alpha means nothing. At least exciting is a descriptor.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 09:07 PM
3

I disagree. The critical error “redpill” men make in their analysis is thinking modern female psychology is innate female psychology. Yes, in general women like charming, entertaining, funny men. But it was never absolutely critical for relationships. The current meta where you must be a dancing monkey or starve is a statement on modern female culture. I reject the notion that it is innate or universal, and I believe not all women are like that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 09:06 PM
2

Why would you lose years? You transition from talking to doing an activity together. On that activity, you see if there’s romantic interest. If not, move on, it’s not rocket science. As I said, if the girl is interested, she’ll agree.
/r/seduction29/10/21 08:58 PM
0

You don’t do it to be cool or to be a bad boy. You do it because it’s the right thing to do.
/r/seduction29/10/21 08:56 PM
1

Because nobody talks like that in real life… has that ever worked for you?
/r/seduction29/10/21 10:40 AM
0

A girl rejecting you is her insulting you and saying you’re not sexually desirable. You don’t have to scream or yell at her, but if you don’t take it as disrespect and just act fine, she’ll think you’re a sucker. A girl would respect you more if you responded to a rejection by leaving her or walking away, at least for a while. Shows you have self respect. Now this girl knows she can push you around and you’ll do nothing..
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:40 AM
1

Just say “nice squats, wanna squat on my face?” And instantly walk away
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:33 AM
1

I just realized you have class with her? Dude it’s so easy, you’re talking about the class, the teacher, the material, etc… and you smoothly go, oh wanna study together for this exam? Or “we should study together sometime” pretend to be dumb or bad at the class if she’s smart, if she’s dumb then just say you’ll help her, the key thing is to make it a logical transition from something you guys are already talking about naturally.
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:11 AM
1

This is terrible and sounds lame
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:09 AM
0

What you want to do is try to ask questions about what she likes to do for fun. Then you say “man we should do that sometime”. If a girl likes you she’ll say yes, they know the actual thing doesn’t matter, doing it together matters. You can do this with any topic btw… ask her how her weekend was, she goes oh I went to the beach, you go “me and you should go to the beach”, etc.. it’s very simple. If a girl likes you, she’ll say yes, if not she’ll say nothing or act aloof. It’s a very easy way to …
/r/seduction29/10/21 09:08 AM
1

Look, man, if you want today’s modern woman, you have to be a dancing monkey. Dance enough and you get it in and that’s it. That’s how she expects things to go. Don’t follow the script and she disengages. It’s not a you thing, it’s a her thing.
/r/seduction29/10/21 08:55 AM
1

Just kinda sad, have compassion for these people.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:28 AM
1

Age is irrelevant to you? Congratulations, you’re about 1% of men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:25 AM
1

I agree, that’s an insane statement. What it tells me is she’s terrified of scaring men away by plainly stating her intentions, which a lot of women do, and which is pretty sad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:23 AM
1

Great advice.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:22 AM
1

I would agree. It’s a woman very much almost in love with herself, you can tell with the artistic far off gazes. In addition, she offers nothing that men want. Why would they care if you were in jail? How does that translate to a longterm relationship? What can you offer to a man for longterm?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:16 AM
1

Am I the only one that finds these types of profiles useless? Forests and protests and cool stories and petting random dogs? It all just seems so superficial. And I’m not trying to insult this woman, she could be very nice, and I can tell she put a lot of effort into it. This question is more for men. For men, does this do anything for you? Like who gives a shit about random dogs and forests and jail? Can you cook? Can you make a nice home? Why do you have to pretend you don’t want a relationshi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:13 AM
1

A 5 that’s been with 10’s can never go down to a 5. NEVER.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:01 AM
2

It’s always the arrogance. Always the arrogance, and then reality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:59 AM
1

I don’t think most women truly understand it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:54 AM
1

I disagree that it’s because of potential. I think they just see how long they can play this poor sucker without him complaining.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:44 AM
1

I’m curious what you guys think: clearly she is literally incapable of forming a bond with a good longterm man. I don’t believe that all women are like this. This, is there something in the culture conditioning them to only be attracted to short-term partners? What is the answer?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:43 AM
1

It’s not that simplistic. There’s finances, jobs that are gone, plus the top men don’t want to marry and the bottom can’t marry.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:36 AM
1

If you read the original thread, you can see they successfully shame him into committing to raise them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:33 AM
2

This is a type of evil I can’t even comprehend. Imagine disrespecting marriage vows and your husband this much.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:32 AM
2

When she has had 10’s inside her, 5’s will repulse her. Even if she herself is a 5.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:25 AM
2

This is honestly just sad. I have nothing but compassion for these delusional people.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:23 AM
1

It’s the audacity for me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:22 AM
1

“My standards are so high that he didn’t last 8 months.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:19 AM
1

That is what we in the Western world today call a CATCH.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:18 AM
1

Imagine investing 2 years of your life and finding out your girlfriend was this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:17 AM
1

I think that answers my question, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 07:13 AM
1

Female sexual liberation was the greatest distortion to hit the dating market - tens of millions of 4’s thinking they have chances with 10’s, getting used while young, then dropped into reality in late 30’s which is probably psychologically devastating. I can’t imagine believing a lie for like 35 years and finding out I was wrong about everything.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:12 AM
1

When you can reengineer a society where “hoedom” is something to be proud of, you can basically do almost anything. And look how proud she is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 07:08 AM
1

Are you currently on any pharmaceuticals or any other substances?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 06:57 AM
1

I always come back to the main quality in modern women: arrogance. Imagine being so arrogant you tell men something that would turn most of them off and just never think twice about it. And clearly it works! I mean some sucker is taking her up on this right?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:56 AM
1

Why won’t this ATM just shut up and give me money?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:55 AM
1

Worth implies some type of value, some type of measurable, calculable number. Almost like some type of score out of 10.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:53 AM
5

It’s not that she’s heightist, it’s that she has been tsunami’d with thousands of sexual options, that you don’t even rank in the top 50. This isn’t a statement on you, it’s a statement on how female sexual promiscuity opened up a world of options to them previously hitherto unknown. But the craziest part is they think the men want relationships with them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:48 AM
1

The arrogance just drips off. They can’t help themselves. “I’ll humor your schlubby ass if you bring a big paycheck and secure my future. Otherwise, just sit on the side until I’m ready.” I just have to lean back and laugh with uproarious laughter. But the worse truth is that many women actually do end up getting it all, the hot sex and the sucker at the end.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:45 AM
4

I find most redpilled analysis simplistic, but you get it. You understand the choice most men are faced with: dancing chiseled monkey or withdrawal. I do not think there is a solution to this: the modern woman will never change. Her operating system has been reprogrammed and she will never find a good man attractive. As such, it’s relationship suicide to engage, but so many men think they’re the ones that can change her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:42 AM
1

Your comebacks are pure cringe and make zero sense. You have the kind of embarrassing confidence that I’m guessing you’re on an SSRI of some sorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 06:37 AM
5

This is why good men should never, EVER settle for a modern woman archetype. Their enormous number of experiences with men far above their league conditions them to believe they are entitled to this for life. They never understand that those out of their league men were using them and never considered them longterm options. As such, this is why I say marriage or relationship is IMPOSSIBLE with this type of woman. She is literally incapable of it. She will always view you as beneath her, as unwor…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:32 AM
14

Women are this way because they can be. They can spend their 20s with a different man every night, then find a boring sucker at 30. This happens far more often than guys here would like to believe.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:25 AM
11

Alpha, beta, these are incorrect terms. Exciting or boring is better. Psychopaths are exciting. And excitement makes for good stories at brunch the next day, it allows her to revel and bask in the laughter of her friends. The only thing that has changed here is the displacement of longterm goals and family with ego.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:23 AM
7

The reason this happens is because of a change in what this type of woman prioritizes. The highest priority for this type of woman is her ego. She loves the story about the weirdo, because it’s “interesting”, which means that she is interesting by association. She loves telling the story about the beer and the fighting, and probably told it a billion times to her girlfriends. Look at her smirk as she’s telling it. That’s her experiencing a high of self-satisfaction, perceiving everyone else’s ad…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:20 AM
1

You just said your enemies have fun with strange little men. Goodness you’re terrible at this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 06:08 AM
-10

Never, ever do what they ask you to. You do things because you want to.
/r/seduction29/10/21 05:32 AM
1

Lmao did you just call yourself strange? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 03:08 AM
1

Did you hear that response in your head? Are you having delusions again?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 03:05 AM
1

Keep fighting those invisible enemies in your head! They say things like “smile more” and write Paul Elam, right? What else do they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 03:04 AM
1

Like differences in physical strength, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 03:03 AM
1

Well, sweetie, perhaps - and stay with me here - perhaps there’s a biological component as to why women are not serial killers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:48 AM
1

You’re an incredible “ally”, fighting sexism that doesn’t exist, against enemies in your head who don’t exist, for women who don’t need your help.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:48 AM
1

No, never tell them. It will turn them off. Just play it cool man.
/r/seduction29/10/21 02:46 AM
1

I, for one, am shocked that WNBA players do not beat NBA players. Shocked, I tell ya!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:32 AM
1

You have a real delusion in your head of some archetype you’re fighting, eh? “Gonna show these incels who write about ‘psycho whores’ and ‘Paul Elam’, whoever the f that is. I can just smell the self-satisfaction as you cranked off that zinger.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:31 AM
1

Literally the article itself doesn’t even believe that assertion and makes ten different arguments for why that conclusion is probably corrupt. The truth is you have internalized sexism and self-hatred.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:27 AM
1

Why is your sexist mouth still talking?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:25 AM
1

Ok, sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:24 AM
1

It’s a flawed study. Clearly you’re biased and are not credible.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:20 AM
1

Questionable study results.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 01:35 AM
–

Sure, you're pathetically catering to misandrists by stating more men are sociopaths / psychopaths (a literal impossibility to know), and in the process losing your dignity. Happy to help.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 09:37 PM
1

ignorant you need therapy narcissist you're frustrated projection This is what you call a master class in debating, fellas.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 09:36 PM
–

Keep licking those boots, fedora boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 09:02 PM
–

When did that happen exactly? You wrote 4 emotional posts - not a single one made any point. Your anger is quite amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 09:02 PM
–

You are proving my point. The hierarchy is the top 15% of men, then the top 70% of women, then the rest. All factions exert downward tactics on those beneath them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 09:01 PM
2

She is with a tall, athletic, attractive man. Imagine writing what you just wrote with a straight face.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 08:59 PM
1

FDS is essentially a Democrat Party operation. It is littered with Democrat rhetoric about "patriarchy" and other party-invented conspiracy theories. I would not be surprised if some of the founders were associated with the Party in some way, shape, or form, even associated with auxiliary organizations. Keeping women hating men, viewing them as financial objects or servants, or in other ways degrading them furthers the Party's goals. It will never be banned.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 11:25 PM
–

Many, many inter-sexual relations occur through dating apps. And dating apps are essentially based off of only one thing. This is not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:23 PM
–

Looks and athletics get you in the waiting room. The rest get you into the office. 75% of men will never get into the actual waiting room. I'm not crying, this is simply real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:22 PM
–

you're only proving what a lot of men have been saying - women want tall, athletic, goodlooking men. What exactly is it you think is ground-breaking?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:20 PM
–

lmao "i married a 6'2 italian man who's athletic, now here's my tips on what women want" you literally can't make this shit up
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:18 PM
2

you're still crying here? lmao that post must have really stung ya
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:16 PM
1

Gentlemen, put in this work and you too can bang women. Whether or not you'll want to be in a relationship with them is another matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:12 PM
2

Every women is a starlet and a model, doncha know.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:10 PM
3

"there is nothing more fragile in today's society than the modern female ego." - me
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:04 PM
3

"The sexual revolution which was philosophically tied to the idea of creating an egalitarian communal utopia, did on the contrary produced a sexual jungle where people who got lucky in the genetic dice-roll get to have it all while others eat shit." Egalitarianism was impossible from the beginning because women naturally have much more sexual power than men due to men's lust for women being much, much stronger. This was mediated by controls on women's sexuality, thus channeling men's lust into t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 10:57 PM
4

for women, if they are naturally attracted to a man, they experience lust and love almost as the same attraction and see no difference between them. this is why many of them are so shocked when a guy they bang moves on or ghosts them, because the banging to them was merely the first step in what they thought was a natural evolution to more. there are some exceptions for real rough-riders who can really compartmentalize, but in general, women see both lust attraction and love attraction as one an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 10:36 PM
3

thank you, your response was expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 10:33 PM
2

whatever we do, it is critical that we absolve the party that has the most power in today's dating market. absolutely CRITICAL.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 10:31 PM
1

this is incredibly ignorant. first start with what traits men need to develop in order to repeatedly sleep with women; these are the men that the vast majority of women will meet. the rest are simply washed out of the process or give up. the assholery/games is a direct result of the process, those who do not develop them will not have repeated success. obviously this concept is something that most women and disney-brainwashed men will reject. women have such power in the current dating market th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 10:27 PM
1

Thank you, doctor.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 02:33 AM
0

Perhaps you had an abusive father growing up.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:23 PM
1

And yet your only objection to my example was a consent one. Are you dense?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:03 PM
0

There is no bullshit. He worked hard and she loafed around mostly. And you’re attacking him. End of story.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:02 PM
1

He clearly said he was struggling to shoulder the load and she did nothing while just watching. That’s evidence enough for selfish neglect. You probably just hate men and would take the opposite side all the time.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 07:58 PM
1

The consent argument is fine. The mutilation one is not.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 07:56 PM
1

Yes, his wife lacks consideration for the household and empathy for how much her husband is working. She may be a narcissist who only thinks of herself. Similar to how a person who heard that story and then attacked the husband would have to be truly psychopathic.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 07:47 PM
1

Then people who lose large amounts of weight and have skin removal surgery are paying someone to mutilate them.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 07:14 PM
1

It’s shaft skin. It’s excess. You can argue that babies cannot consent, but you can’t argue it’s mutilation. It just makes you sound like extremists.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:58 PM
0

You need therapy, you cold, conniving lacking in empathy trash person.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:41 PM
-2

Is pleasure all that you live for?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 05:21 AM
18

If you were a man posting in FDS, ask feminists, nice guys, or any other sub, you’d be banned. You should be thankful just for being allowed to post here.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre17/05/21 05:11 AM
-1

You and your fellow sisters?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:59 AM
0

Then argue for consent. Mutilation arguments will go nowhere.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:58 AM
1

The same place your head is right now.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:48 AM
1

If you guys simply pushed for consent, you’d have a better case.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:48 AM
1

I’ve had it all. I know from experience.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:42 AM
0

That’s a pretty picture. All you need is the head.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:40 AM
-2

It’s slightly more sensitive skin. Don’t deify it man.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:39 AM
1

You think circumcision is rape? Are you ok?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 03:13 AM
1

You’re just a girl with very strong feelings on circumcision? That’s... interesting.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 03:07 AM
0

No, it’s not. It’s skin around it, and excess skin on top of that.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 03:06 AM
-1

Nothing is getting severed. Excess shaft skin is getting removed.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 03:05 AM
0

If you guys were a serious movement, which you aren’t, you would advocate for better standards and training. Instead you have a faintly psychopathic air about you.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 03:04 AM
0

Any surgery can be performed incorrectly. In this case, it can be done too tight. You know all this.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 02:59 AM
0

Good thing, because otherwise you’d be SOL.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 02:51 AM
-1

Nobody believes it’s the most sensitive part. It’s extra shaft skin. You can argue that there should be consent. But you can’t argue it’s mutilation.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 02:50 AM
0

You’re saying people who lost weight are paying to be mutilated? Why would they do that?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 02:47 AM
-3

Except it’s not. Mutilation is when you actually damage the body. It is protective excess skin with slightly more nerves. You can argue that perhaps they shouldn’t do it without consent. But comparing it to FGM is simply ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 02:47 AM
-1

It’s slightly more sensitive skin. Whether it should be a choice is a different matter.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 12:03 AM
-4

It’s still cosmetic health surgery.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:46 PM
-1

That it is not mutilation, it is cosmetic, health surgery.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:46 PM
-1

Incorrect, they are paying for elective, cosmetic surgery.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:39 PM
-2

Incorrect, that would be an elective, cosmetic surgery.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:39 PM
0

So the people who lost weight are voluntarily paying to be mutilated?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:36 PM
-3

Incorrect, that is all part of the sex organ.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:35 PM
-1

Strong rebuttal.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:35 PM
-9

Is it mutilation?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:35 PM
6

We need a nationwide campaign to instill self-respect in men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 11:22 PM
-18

When someone has excess skin removal surgery after drastic weight loss, is that mutilation?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:21 PM
3

You think there’s a man taking this deal? A man is going to marry this woman and provide for 5 kids, all while she’s making him wait?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 11:16 PM
-32

It’s not mutilation. It’s not remotely the same. One, you’re removing excess skin, the other, you’re actually mutilating the organ. Are some of them too tight? Yes. Should young men have the choice? These are questions, but it’s not mutilation if done correctly.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:09 PM
8

You got two pregnant and just left?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 10:57 PM
1

I always have the same question: do men actually exist that take this deal?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 10:47 PM
1

It’s delusion. There’s no other word for it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 10:44 PM
2

A woman can theoretically stay in Sex Mode indefinitely, especially if they work some cougar angle like this one is doing. If they try to shift into Relationship Mode, however, it’ll be night and day. So congrats to this woman, but she probably doesn’t really have a choice anymore. It’s cougar and Cubs from here on out. And hey, if that’s all she wants for the next couple decades, good for her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 10:19 PM
3

Incel is like creep - both are simply slurs used by misandrists.
/r/MGTOW216/05/21 09:59 PM
2

Hmm 🤔
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 03:30 AM
4

It’s always hilarious when they think they’re in control. Honey, they already swiped left.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/21 04:05 AM
5

I think it all comes down to ego versus humility. Way too much ego nowadays, not nearly enough humility. And by the time humbling happens, it’s too late. Just a never ending cycle.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/21 02:57 AM
6

Yeah that’s never happening
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/21 02:55 AM
5

What does “emotionally unavailable” even mean? He refuses to cry for me? He refuses to see me as a girlfriend? Does it basically just mean she’s dealing with a bunch of players who see her as meat?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/21 02:52 AM
4

I’ll cut her some slack since she’s not a covid drone
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/21 11:43 PM
7

Very impressive self awareness. It’s so rare. I wonder if her upbringing was different or something.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre11/05/21 06:57 AM
12

To be honest, on some level I actually feel sorry for the women because they’re getting tricked. Many of them do not end up enjoying the “party culture” and realize belatedly that they were used sexually and have lasting psychological damage and/or reputational damage. Later on, they may realize that a lot of the ideas indoctrinated into them were lies. You are unique to even see the delusion in the first place. Additionally, you will have an advantage among the other women competing for men for…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre11/05/21 06:55 AM
1

I think this is a good comparison. Both sexes suffer from unrealistic expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 06:40 AM
1

No, I think when they discuss pair bonding, they’re mostly talking about oxytocin release, which is a biological process.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/21 05:02 AM
2

It is not a biological problem, but a psychological one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 04:45 PM
23

It has nothing to do with healing - when you stay in “Excitement Mode” for too long, you get locked in and can’t leave. This woman will always have contempt for anyone who is not a narcissistic sociopath. It’s done.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 08:47 AM
31

Not just a beta bux - she would 1,000% divorce him after a while and destroy his net worth. This specific “type” of woman is literally incapable of marriage. Why do these men not get it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 07:52 AM
2

Agree. They convince themselves that they’re more special than any of the 100 other girls doing the exact same thing. It’s kind of sad honestly, they never have a chance and you just see it over and over.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 07:22 AM
1

One thing in common with all of these women: ultimatums. It speaks to a mentality of control.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 07:20 AM
6

Literally the only question I ask myself every time I see one of them 🤣
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 07:16 AM
5

When they say pick me, they mean the girl who gets used by the sociopath. FDS is essentially a new wave of advice that says bang the sociopath and finesse the chump.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 07:06 AM
24

FDS doesn’t even allow you to post if you’re a man. It’s a joke of a cult of a sub.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 06:58 AM
56

The crazy thing is, you don’t know what you don’t know. A lot of both men and women were perfectly happy with their significant others. They hadn’t sampled partners like they were at a buffet, so they didn’t have this huge base of knowledge to compare their spouse to. They appreciated what they had, they didn’t look down on their spouse, and it worked. Comparison and a wealth of options can destroy marriages.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 06:57 AM
47

If you want to use a car analogy, it’s a Tesla that is going to spontaneously combust with the doors locked and you inside.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 06:54 AM
4

The craziest part is she’d look down on him when really he should be the one looking down on her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 05:04 AM
29

This is the correct answer. It’s not a pair bonding issue. She is simply locked into excitement-only attraction. Any moral or character qualities register zero on the attraction scale. In other words, she has calcified at a shallow state. Rehabilitation is probably impossible.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 04:15 AM
65

Why would you want her? It would be disaster and she would have contempt for you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 03:58 AM
13

I really think that staying too long in the “sexually exciting” frame of mind for too long can have these types of effects. For years and years, the only question she asked herself as she dated was, does he get me sexually excited. It’s about 10-20% of a person’s personality, but she made it 100% and now it’s locked in. It’s almost impossible to go back. She will never be attracted to someone who doesn’t “excite” her. Even if she forced herself to marry the guy, she would always look down on him…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/21 03:55 AM
5

It’s very simple, guys. Most women in casual dating mode want looks and excitement. They hold the leverage because it’s casual. If you don’t have looks and excitement, you lose. There’s no point in bitching about it - it’s simply the nature of casual dating.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/05/21 09:00 PM
3

To some it’s all the same
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 06:55 PM
6

I don’t know - I think there’s a lot of desperate men Out there
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 04:19 PM
12

The fact that she “wasn’t herself” proves she felt guilty, because she knew her and 7 were getting serious. And if 7 had found out, he would have immediately left.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 07:57 AM
7

To be at peak sexual power is to literally not give a shit what you write, what pic you take, how you present, and still have men flock to you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 07:52 AM
8

Really the only thing I wonder too. Does this work on anyone?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 07:50 AM
1

Why would anyone listen to a woman lecture men on sex? It’s like having an astronaut give lectures on plumbing. Just mind boggling.
/r/ExRedPill05/05/21 03:15 AM
1

This is not a “belief”, but empirical social science research.
/r/ExRedPill05/05/21 03:14 AM
1

Don’t listen to her, she’s desperate to avoid any accountability for women’s behavior. They have done research showing psychopaths and bullies have higher numbers of sexual partners and interest. This does not mean all, but many.
/r/ExRedPill05/05/21 03:13 AM
1

Only the suckers and chumps will pay. Clearheaded men can see this is a bad deal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 07:31 AM
2

Where is the next good place to go?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 07:30 AM
1

She tries to gaslight people into feeling sorry for her. By listing all of his clearly psychotic qualities, she thinks that she’s creating sympathy for herself. But instead, she’s making normal people think, “why would you stay 6 years with that person?” Many women do not understand that making a video like this is a negative. Men do not want to play therapist. Your baggage is an additional problem. Your psychological trauma is an extra problem. You semi-bragging about it to create sympathy actu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 06:59 AM
4

100% they’ve banged.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 03:55 AM
1

The Central Committee On Feelings and Emotions did.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 01:14 AM
4

“You ‘nice guys’ are just jealous she won’t take you!”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/21 12:31 AM
1

“You Nice Guys are just angry that she won’t choose you! You know you’re all dying to get a piece of that, incels!”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/21 12:06 AM
2

No thank you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/21 08:24 PM
1

Yeah, about 25%. 50-50 definitely seems too lopsided if you were the one who earned it all.
/r/Divorce_Men20/04/21 01:18 AM
1

Just a personal question, but what do you think would be a fair percentage? Should it even be a percentage, or some type of cost of living formula?
/r/Divorce_Men19/04/21 03:29 AM
1

So you generated 450k over 6 years, and she took 180k of it? So she took 40% of wealth you created over 6 years? Hmm yeah that’s definitely painful. This brings up a broader question fellas: if we were to rewrite these distribution laws to be fairer, what would a fair distribution look like?
/r/Divorce_Men19/04/21 03:01 AM
1

Dude, nobody can run that fucking math. Can you give the cliff notes so we can understand how much she took?
/r/Divorce_Men19/04/21 02:35 AM
1

Marxists have essentially the same play that they run over and over and over again: Women, be scared of men; Non-whites, be scared of whites and cops; LGBTQ, be scared of straight; Etc... Every day they wake up and repeat the same old fearmongering shit. Every single day. The article may change, the movie may change, but it’s the same literal message every single fucking day.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:27 AM
3

What?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:21 AM
8

No idea who Lolo is, but how sad. Ladies, NEVER “pretend” you’re not serious if you are - there is zero shame in wanting something serious. Filter out all the non-serious guys and find your guy. Don’t waste time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/21 08:28 PM
1

At least she’s honest.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/21 03:10 AM
2

I would love to see the success rate of their strategies, but it’s more like a religion not to be questioned, hence the banning of all counter viewpoints.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 03:18 AM
1

I think it’s too late at this point.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 07:39 PM
1

Because any woman in her early 20’s would have a bunch of options - she would select the highest value one she could get. And in her 20’s, she would be at the peak of her power, meaning she could get someone way out of her league.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 06:32 PM
1

Keep deriving pleasure from other people’s pain, suffering, and humiliation then, all the while priding yourself on your incredible enlightenment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 07:23 AM
2

It’s the biggest echo chamber on earth, literally only hive mind supporters are allowed to post.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 07:20 AM
0

Sadism in general is enjoying other’s pain, suffering, and humiliation. It’s not remotely a good thing for humans to be, especially not in a discussion thread. You can try to carve out some exception for the bedroom, but we’re not in a bedroom, this is a public dialogue, and it is never healthy to take pleasure in the misfortunes of others. Your bedroom clause isn’t even applicable.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 07:16 AM
1

The thing is, past a certain age, telling them will only devastate them emotionally. Now if you have a young daughter or a girl who is humble enough to listen to older wisdom, tell her to use her youthful power and beauty while it’s at its peak to secure the best possible future she can. But 99% of the time, they don’t want to hear it from you and will hate you for it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 06:03 AM
3

Haha ok ;) btw I saw your virgin thread, always lie next time, especially with girls. People are unnecessarily mean and cold about things like that. If anyone ever asks again, just go the opposite direction and sarcastically say, “yeah, I’ve slept with 100 women” And being a virgin is not a big deal, trust me nobody can tell.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 06:01 AM
2

Are you calling yourself a sadist? Don’t let cruel people transform you into evil.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 05:52 AM
6

I agree, it sounds like he was callously just telling her with zero point. I generally see zero point in telling women stuff like this unless they are extremely receptive and open to advice like, “use your power while it is at its greatest to put yourself in a solid future position”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 05:45 AM
4

It’s just kinda sad, I feel bad for her, it will be a difficult road. If a woman does not have extreme arrogance or entitlement, I see little benefit to telling them this, unless it is done in an extremely kind manner or to help them, but even still it will probably emotionally devastate many like this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 05:43 AM
0

Dudes crying about being sexually objectified is probably one of the most pathetic things I’ve seen. Tell that to some virgin nerd who’d give his left nut to be objectified.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/21 07:42 AM
1

Gentlemen, any woman who asks you how much you make, give her an insultingly low answer to prove just how little you give a fuck what she thinks about it. “I make 20k a year - yeah, it’s pretty boss”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/21 06:30 AM
1

This post is literal art. It is like the confirmation of all post-promiscuity-revolution theory in one pathetic, embarrassing, lacking in self awareness post. Truly a thing of beauty.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/21 06:11 AM
1

Just such a grotesquely offensive comment he should delete and block her number immediately. Men, never, ever let someone treat you like that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/21 04:28 AM
3

The reason the 80-20 principle occurs is not because 80% of the women want 20% of the men, it’s because for the first time, 80% of the women CAN sleep with 20% of the men. In a marriage-centered culture, women did not have the currency to fraternize with men “out of their league”, so to speak. With the promiscuity revolution, women suddenly had extra currency to rent the time of a man they previously did not have a chance with: themselves. For the price of a one night stand, they could now attai…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/21 03:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter