TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vanishghost Archive

View 1 posts and 33 comments by vanishghost on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

re: Feminismvanishghost/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:41 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

It's good to take out the emotion and look at things objectively. Great article
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:34 PM
9

Mother fuckers.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 05:36 AM
1

Thanks yo
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:32 AM
-1

Op plz
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:41 PM
6

What's this celebrity circle he mentioned? I feel like I've heard it before but I'm not sure. Also why does he jump from doing cocaine in Buckingham palace (super baller btw) to groping 14 year olds? I'm a little lost.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:33 PM
2

You're making assumptions about me that are untrue and frankly I don't feel like arguing about some mundane shit you conjured up. That being said, I also love being right. So here's my final response to you. When did I say feminism only aadresses women's issues? I did not. I said ms. Watson clearly is involving men in an issue that affects both genders, but that she believes is rooted in men(did you see the flow chart? I know its complicated for you. Try to keep up. ) We can reference all the li…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:17 PM
2

Does that mean I have to adhere to feminist doctrine to want equality?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:46 AM
6

You're right, my bad. Those speech marks are a little subjectivly placed but its really no big deal. Was waiting for someone to post this anyway.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 07:21 PM
5

I don't think everything she was saying was horrible, and your title made it sound like she was spewing the same typical "feminist bullshit", which to some extent she might be but some of the things she said carried into a lot of the ideology here. It's far from perfect but a step in the right direction IMO.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:27 PM
16

I think her intentions are in the right direction, bit still far from perfect. She obviously wants to include men in gender politics (yeah thanks lol I really need your fucking permission) but to the extent that it focuses on making women's lives better. From what I can tell, her thought process is: men are oppressed, because - Women are oppressed, because - Men. We're both suffering in different ways and it's great she's addressing the women and girls part of that. I just want to know when ever…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:17 PM
27

Yeah and then the guy continues to say he isn't doing that when we all know this is the exact point he's making. Fucking bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:12 PM
4

Yeah the links look interesting (didn't go through them all) but this was just sad and frustrating.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:32 PM
1

Fair enough. Thanks for the clarifacation
/r/MensRights07/07/14 09:18 AM
1

This is fucking horrible but, where are the feminists involved? Feminist isn't even mentioned in the article.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:25 PM
2

Obviously this mother is inept but I don't think it necessarily contributes to the conversation about men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:54 AM
-5

Can you provide me with some backing to this? If you show me that a woman who (based on actual statistics I am providing you with) is on average 6 inches shorter and 30lbs lighter than the average man can, using only her own force, stop a rape from happening, maybe I will begin to agree with you.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:56 PM
-7

Women (as I said before) lack the same physical strength/ capabilities as men. 85% of victims of domestic abuse are women. Incredible amounts of women have been exposed to street harassment You still failed to provide me with any statistics of your own. Please show me something so I can agree or disagree with you.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:43 PM
-8

In terms of physical strength? No. Does the gun make her more powerful in context? Yes. Does this mean every woman on Earth should have to carry a weapon around everyday to feel safe? No.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:23 PM
-7

*Physical power to harm the man, is what I should have said. My bad.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:13 PM
-3

Perhaps women avoid going out at night or taking certain avenues home because they're afraid of confrontation? And I don't know what statistics you're talking about. Mind giving me some reference?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:10 PM
6

Good point, but that's not the same issue. A man has the right to bond with his child on the premise that he is biologically related to the child - even if he can't meet the demands of pregnancy he is just as much related to the child as the mother, and hence he should benefit in the same way as her. This is contrasting to holding a job where, nobody is assumed any right to have or keep said job unless proving themselves first.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:03 PM
-7

Also, just look at any male sport and compare it with any female sport. Men lift heavier, run faster, and perform better; I'm not saying there aren't female outliers who can outperform men but overall we have higher levels of testosterone, grow bigger, build more muscle and carry less fat.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:58 PM
-11

Regardless, a man doesn't feel unsafe walking down a street alone at night, or in the least not nearly as unsafe as a woman would feel.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:52 PM
-11

No, I don't think it's funny, and I do think this blog post points out the issues we have with double standards in society. If a guy did that it would be fucked up. But do the women in this movie have the power to physically harm the man? No. And if it were the other way around three men would almost definitely have the ability to pose a serious threat to the woman. It's not right the way it's being portrayed as comedic and it's unfair that if the tables were turned we as men would be given an u…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:30 PM
4

If the lumberjill lacks the physical strength or endurance that the lumberjack does, and hauls in less wood everyday because of this, of course. If the lumberjack happens to be this way instead and the lumberjill is absolutely jacked, then the lumberjill will make more. I'm in no way in favor of double standards but I'm not going to deny they exist. Should a woman who can't meet the physical qualifications of being a fireman be allowed a less strenuous test of her strength because she is a woman…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:20 PM
-26

The thing is, I don't disagree with you. Women shouldn't be allowed to get away with those things. But they can and men won't be able to. Why? We're different from one another. Women aren't physically built like men (for the most part) and an average man will be able to overpower the average woman. Again, I'm not saying I disagree with you, it's not fair how society would treat the masculine version of this movie, but I am saying that it makes sense that men could not be portrayed in such a ligh…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:50 PM
1

Reposted this due to my insufficient link posting skills. Thanks to /u/Black_caped_man
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:43 AM
1

Crap I totally did. Thanks for the heads up.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:40 AM
1

Maybe you won't, but who's to say others won't? Mechanics, computer programmers, pilots, engineers, the list goes on. And you want to go to med school? Be a field medic. Get hands on experience in high pressure situations that will teach you how to handle yourself when you need to. I have no doubt in my mind that you would learn things in the army that give you spillover benefits into other parts of your life. All this aside, I am left to assume we come from somewhat different cultures which mak…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:03 PM
1

Yes. Even when you say it like that. As I said before, the costs outweigh the benefits. Instill some patriotism in the people: just because the men get involved doesn't mean everyone else doesn't. You have a son, a brother, a nephew, a friend's cousin in the military so you support it. You learn the cost of having someone put their life on the line and people become less sensitive to sending the men overseas to die. The men become disciplined, productive members of society. They learn skills the…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:31 PM
2

Look at the US government's expenditures. In 2013 defense made up almost 18% of the budget source
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:57 PM
2

I mean, yeah, it's pretty serious. However, I still hold strong that all able bodied young men should be subject to at least some minimal form of service. An ex marine told me not too long ago his reasoning for supporting the same issue, "It wasn't until I joined the corps that I understood the price we all pay for freedom. I think you neglect to respect that cost when don't you fully understand it."
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:38 PM
3

I mean, does this aggravate you because you may be forcefully drafted to the military or because women don't have to sign up for this? In my opinion, while a draft is horrifying among the general population (hence, Vietnam) conscription isn't the worst thing in the world. 1 - 2 years of service isn't incredibly daunting, and once the idea has been integrated into society it becomes much more accepted. I live the UAE and they just made it a requirement for all young men to do a year (don't quote …
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter