TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

vargstrike Archive

View 4 posts and 215 comments by vargstrike on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

They secretly agree, then pretend not to so as not to scare off men. They're cowards.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/20 06:24 PM
1

I have a gf :) too bad
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/20 06:22 PM
1

Why would I want to read about a bunch of old harpies?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:02 AM
1

Lol women didn't fight for shit. What a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 02:41 AM
1

I'm not fit. And I'm fairly objective.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 06:01 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 06:00 PM
1

No, we don't. I'm not paying taxes for that lol. Women get enough programs as it is. Screw that. I'll vote against it, just like I vote against every other pro-female agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 05:35 PM
1

You're deluded if you think this doesn't happen often hahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 03:30 PM
1

5/10 attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 03:30 PM
1

False. For average guys: Social game > cold approach > OLD (scam)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 03:06 PM
1

Prove it, because it didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 02:11 AM
2

What if an attractive man is not willing to pay, does he get chosen?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:50 PM
2

Agreed. This would be a more honest way to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:49 PM
1

Really? I don't pay for shit and I have sex all the time. Strange. Maybe you aren't as experienced as you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:48 PM
-1

True. That never happens except to Chad, but Chad doesn't pay to play anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:39 PM
3

Poorfag? So basically, shut up and give women money. It's 2020. Women can make their own money and pay for their own dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:38 PM
5

Indeed. And men should not pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:26 PM
1

Except men aren't shallow and immoral. If that were the case, they wouldn't have given women equal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:25 PM
1

Zero data? Now that is false and laughable. Ignorance isn't going to help you here, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 08:24 PM
1

Yeah, it's really bizarre. I think on actual practice this doesn't work, and these women wind up lonely or being passed around.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 04:42 PM
1

"mass murder". You mean like when Elliot Rodger killed more men than women? You people only care when women are victims. When men are victims, you like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 04:35 PM
1

No, average men struggle with OLD and rarely see success. It's not just "incels", and plenty of average guys like myself find success outside of OLD. Even incels can eventually find success outside of OLD. OLD is a scam for average men, especially if they are monogamous. There is zero data to support anything you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 04:32 PM
2

That's not an argument. Try harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 04:10 PM
1

Because a sexless relationship with a man confers non-sexual benefits such as emotional support, financial support, favors, etc. in exchange for female companionship, provided that the woman has the freedom to sleep with other men. The future is female and the future of relationships is polyamorous. This is progress and good.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:43 PM
1

That's all dating apps are now. Endless swiping. Women don't read men's bios, but demand the same from men, even tho the ratio of men to women is higher and most men aren't attractive enough for OLD. only women, Chads, and idiots use these things. I'm surprised this scam has continued for so long.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:41 PM
1

The older men get, the less they need women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:39 PM
2

Simple. They won't settle for their SMV match because Chad fucked them in their earlier years.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:38 PM
1

Women are not blind to hypergamy. They're just in damage control mode when men notice and their observations with other men. Nothing keeps the hamster wheel turning more than intelligent men making well-informed decisions when it comes to women, because it lowers the value of the average woman overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:36 PM
0

It's a joke, because there is no incel mass shooter phenomenon. Most incels are marginalized by society, not out in public shooting people. Do you want me to link reports that embarrassingly dismantle the incel shooter meme, such as those demonstrating that the Toronto guy referenced earlier in fact had a girlfriend? I will fact check you, and you will enjoy it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:33 PM
1

Thanks for the definition, but I am perfectly aware of what red pill means. Where are you going with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:30 PM
1

My ideology? What are you referencing? I'm not a biological determinist, so you have lost me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:10 PM
1

as a straight man or woman, do you sometimes resent the fact that you're straight? No. Do you wish you could turn off your sexual attraction to the opposite sex so you wouldn't have to deal with them? I would have to deal with women regardless. There are no safe male spaces. And so that the shit you've been talking about them in this sub wouldn't be an issue in your life anymore? There is a war between the sexes. The coward's way is to avoid it. I am not a coward. I fight for myself and other me…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:06 PM
2

"Most men have no morals so your argument is invalid." Men, these are the misandrists who believe that men abused women for thousands of years under the tyrannically oppressive system known as patriarchy. So, men deserve any and all hatred by modern women and blue pilled weirdos for their historical crimes. If you as a man are not guilty, you better shut up when women speak. Listen. Shut up. Take it like a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:02 PM
2

Bigotry comes in all colors, and I'm not the only one with a negative opinion of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 02:09 AM
2

You're great PR for the left, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 01:36 AM
1

A hundred years ago, women could vote, work, divorce, be promiscuous, and approximately seventy years before that, suffragettes were highly active. So, no, I'm not going to berate the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 01:34 AM
3

"If there is anything I can do to contribute to their suffering, I would do it in a heartbeat." I've read and heard white nationalists say the same about black men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 01:24 AM
1

The problems are gynocentricism and the expendability of men in America. Change either of those and things would improve a hell of a lot more for the majority of men, including incels. Also, the incel shooter meme is a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 01:23 AM
3

Again, wrong. My so-called value hasn't taken a dent as a result of my standing up for them. Your callous disregard for those at the bottom only validates their anger. Do you not see this? Also, are you a heterosexual woman, and what is your ethnicity?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 01:15 AM
2

A man's worth has absolutely zilch to do with whether women find him sexually desirable. Tying a man's worth to his sexual performance is one of the greatest harms done to masculinity and men. That gynocentricism inherent to your post is a direct result of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 01:12 AM
3

It's best not to lead off an argument with blatant falsehood.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 10:58 PM
3

Yet more proof that feminism is political misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 08:38 PM
3

I'm standing up for them, and plenty of people stand up for them online. You're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 06:57 PM
1

Men are tired of the double standards. You'll see.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 04:30 PM
2

Nice fake apathy hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 04:03 PM
3

Indeed. Women may want men to shut up, but we will not. In fact, we will get louder and in their face till their open discrimination against romantically struggling men ends. This is a war between the sexes. More men need to understand this in order to triumph.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 03:32 PM
2

I respect my body, too, which is why I opposed feminism and fight for incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 03:30 PM
4

You're the typical purple pill sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 04:06 AM
1

It's not difficult for a woman to find a date today.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 12:47 AM
8

Then why is calling a man a virgin an insult? I have seen American women insult men using virgin as a slur, a sexual epithet with obviously negative connotations.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:58 PM
3

I'm not an incel. Get over it lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:56 PM
3

Feminism is political misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:22 PM
4

Men and women are at war due to the asymmetry in their respective values, biological differences, and yes, feminism. Men and women compete economically and sexually. We are not on the same team at all, so there is nothing to unite us.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:22 PM
1

There is a war between the sexes. Right now, women are winning, but that will change.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:18 PM
2

Paying to be in a woman's rotation is disgusting and humiliating.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:17 PM
4

Taking women out on dates is a surefire way to get taken advantage of by women in 2020. Go dutch, or take her on cheap and free dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:16 PM
9

CMV: most American women would rather incels die sexless and childless than improve themselves enough to be "worthy" of sexual intimacy that isn't paid for.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 08:14 PM
2

Yup. But, women prefer to share a few attractive men no matter the consequences. That is progress. Increase in STD's and single motherhood are a small price to pay for progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 04:08 PM
1

It has nothing to do with circumcision, and every to do with women having sex without protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 04:07 PM
5

It's even worse than OP suggests. Any man who pays for dinner dates and to properly court a woman is going to find out the hard way that those women are using him. The men she fucked before him didn't put in half the effort nor investment. It's all so tiring to weed out the gold digging whores who want free money and meal tickets from genuine women. If I weren't in an LTR, I wouldn't bother dating. Millennial men and zoomers have it the worst. It's over for average betas. We're chump change to w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 02:57 PM
2

Social circle game is by the easiest for average men. Unfortunately this sub pushes OLD hard, and anyone who recommends an alternative is told to use OLD anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 02:53 PM
0

6' 2, white, looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 02:47 PM
2

I tried all the usual practical advice: online dating, improving my looks, working out, meeting people, improving income, etc. Didn't help one bit. Nothing improved my chances with women. I quit OLD, drank more, let my diet go to shit, and kept living my life. I later met my gf through mutual friends. I'm objectively less attractive than ever but she wants me more than any other woman. It was pure luck. Most incels are not and will not be so lucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 08:04 PM
7

You aren't missing anything. The only type of men who sign up for the FDS treatment are codependent types and pathetic soyboys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 07:34 PM
1

I am an ex-incel who made the journey. AMA
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 07:29 PM
9

Men created and subsidize the police and nanny states necessary to keep single mothers alive. Men are the ones who granted all rights to women, regardless of whether they owned property or fought in wars. Women have this absurd view of history where men historically brutalized them, and that if only they were free from male tyranny, they would be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:54 PM
1

Then you're an exception, not the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:48 PM
1

No, you just have poor reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 12:16 AM
1

Well first, I said social stigma against women cheating has mostly been eliminated, not entirely, and I stand by that statement. See my original comment. Unilaterally, if a man cheats, he is in the wrong. If a woman cheats, there is some assumed deeper reason, and the man still bears some responsibility. Men bear more responsibility for cheating even in an age of equality. This is a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 11:51 PM
1

How about you make a counter argument instead?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 10:58 PM
1

Then disprove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 09:43 PM
1

Do you have something to add?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 09:24 PM
4

To add, the majority of women can obtain sex far more easily than men. Thus, for women, it takes self discipline not to cheat, since most social stigma surrounding cheating has mostly been eliminated for women. It's always bad when the man cheats, universally, even if he had less temptation or otherwise demonstrated tremendous self control. The standards applied to men and women are asymmetrical as are the punishments, even in societies who value equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 08:49 PM
0

It's simple. Hobbies require investment of time and money (resources). Females want resources from males in exchange for sex. When the male invests resources on something other than the female, she attempts to divert his attention away from the pursuit and back to her. If the male resists, he has "peter pan syndrome" or can't man/grow up. The boyish play present in all men is to be both nurtured and kept in check, not stamped out completely or vilified. Unfortunately, western women, in their ina…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 07:19 PM
1

You're right. 40 isn't that far off. I suppose I could be comfortable with that, too. That being said, I don't ask women nor want to know what they've done.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 07:04 PM
1

I'd be comfortable with 30 or less. 40 or more is too much to swallow, even for me. Granted, notch count has always matter more to women in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 06:48 PM
1

Yes. I think women mean such comments as a compliment, but they don't realize how unattractive it is. No one, male or female, wants to be compared to past lovers. It's best to shut up about it. Western culture has an odd mix of open promiscuity and indiscretion, as opposed to promiscuity kept private, letting sleeping dogs lie so to speak. It's enough to make all but the most egotistical people feel at unease.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 06:28 PM
2

Interesting. How good looking are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 05:06 PM
1

Female strangers(such as a girl you just meet in at a bar or party) Never. Male strangers Never. Female friends Never. Male friends Sometimes. Women you're sleeping with/dating. Only my current SO.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 05:05 PM
1

Yes, and that is his right, so long as he doesn't abuse anyone. I see no evidence of illegality, violence, or abuse. You're applying a value judgment to an honest poster with whom you ideologically disagree, on a sub with a wide variety of beliefs. Do you still suspect I'm his alt, or is it more likely that two people disagree with you? Come on, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 11:54 PM
0

Lol wow. Just wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 10:18 PM
0

It's fair game, but women don't like when men apply standards and screening to them, as it involves judging them for their behavior. There is a double standard here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 09:34 PM
1

I didn't check his post history, as I judge assertions independently, but I think he doesn't mean to come off that way. He seems to be arguing in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 08:11 PM
1

There is nothing you can do about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 07:25 PM
1

It's over for you. You'll see.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 07:24 PM
1

Those are some serious allegations. Do you have proof he is a psychopath?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 07:23 PM
12

That is why I asked her. An alarmingly high amount of women evaluate men based on evaluations from other women. Personally, nearly every woman interested in me, regardless of whether we dated even once, wanted to know about my sexual experiences. My girlfriend is the only one who didn't care, but she is a rare breed. Very common in America, possibly elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 05:27 PM
1

Indeed. Same in my experience. No woman needs to be worried about her worth if she is truly good quality. Only women pawning themselves off as better than they are sweat when a man tests them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 05:15 PM
2

Putting women through shit tests is both logical and based. I support this. It prevents men from being duped and is a surefire way to separate women worthy of commitment and resources from those unworthy. Most women are dumb enough to offer all the dirt you need after a couple of lays, so it's a no brainer for men. Too bad women are offended by this. They shouldn't be. It's what they do to men!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 05:06 PM
4

Quality of women, meaning whether they are low or high quality ? Which bothers you more?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 05:02 PM
1

But would you settle for a man with a low n-count? Your boyfriend has a higher n-count due to being attractive. While you may think you'd be happier with a man whose n-count is lower, and therefore appreciates sex with you more, he is likely to be less attractive, exciting, and sexually appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 06:49 PM
1

It's not dumb, it's realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 07:44 PM
3

Hybristophilia isn't often discussed, because it's a taboo. It explains the sexual attention that criminals obtain after conviction for anything from drug charges to serial rape and murder. There will always be a small subset of women who are attracted to violent risk-takers. In a milder form, which is not hybristophilia, a larger subset of women conflate aggression and risk-taking with masculinity and dominance, which is why almost no male criminals are virgins. An average guy can boost his SMV…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 07:42 PM
2

It's not "near zero effort". OLD is a time sink for average and below average men. That time is better utilized building ones social network in order to meet women in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 06:46 PM
14

No. Socially speaking, yes. Men who take themselves out of the marriage market are not contributing their resources to women outside of taxes. Further, MGTOW are automatically considered incels and misogynists, even though a great deal of them date, marry, or have been married. The idea is that they are "giving up" and not making women happy; therefore, they are bad men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 06:39 PM
1

Why not both? Simple. Average men get more out of IRL dating than OLD. OLD is for handsome 8-10 men. Even 7/10 men who can pull the odd date on Tinder can get more success IRL, assuming he has other qualities women find attractive, such as money.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 04:13 PM
3

No, OLD is for the most attractive men and women. Average men gain little to nothing from OLD. It is mostly a scam for average guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 04:10 PM
3

The women on this sub are fine with those preferences. They just believe that few men on this sub and in general are worthy of those preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 01:18 AM
1

I don't want to change your view, because your vitriol towards men is merely the resentment you feel at not being able to obtain and KEEP the types of men you are attracted to. Therefore, the last thing young men need are more misandrist women like yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 07:53 PM
1

Fantastic point. Good insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 08:03 PM
2

Was she reprimanded before being fired?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 06:59 PM
7

That is nothing short of fucked up. Dress codes are only enforced for men in my company as well. So long as women are not exposing their nipples, vaginas, or bare ass cheeks inside of the building during business hours, they can and will wear whatever they want. If men complain about it, they are the creeps. I'm actually not sure what it takes for a woman to be called in to HR, save for behavior that is illegal or almost illegal anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 06:58 PM
2

It only benefits women and alphas, which is why the rest of us who still value ourselves as human being are no longer playing by the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 03:44 PM
5

Well, for fuckbois and alphas, it's difficult. For the rest of us, we're just happy to have someone and genuinely appreciate the companionship and sex our significant others provide for us. Speaking personally, I believe monogamy and trust are worth the struggle and provide better rewards in the long-term. No, I am not religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 03:37 PM
1

It's a bullshit, hackneyed saying to make men feel better about themselves. The reality is only high value men gatekeep anything, whereas women are the gatekeepers to all sex for all men to the point that they will outlaw and make socially taboo prostitution. There is simply no male equivalent of gatekeeping. It absolutely does not exist, except in the case of the high value men that all women desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 03:33 PM
1

I can't afford deal breakers. In an ideal world however, my deal breakers would be obesity, single motherhood, poor spending habits, and misandry. I'm athletic, childless, financially secure, and not a misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 03:31 PM
6

OP is generally correct, except for Chad/alphas, because women desire their genes and cocks, too. There are some subtleties and exceptions as women are wont to point out in order to justify their behavior, but generally, outside of professional, academic, and technical environments where competency is valued, women generally see sub-alpha and non-fuckboi men as little more than accessories, entertainment, laborers, and bank accounts. I learned a long time ago to avoid interaction with women outs…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 03:26 PM
1

I'm a man with friends of all sexes. You?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 09:47 AM
1

Women have more options, so they move on more quickly. Even average, boring girls have guys lined up on various social media platforms at any given time. Generally, their boyfriends are expendable. Most men have to work insanely hard for any kind of female attention by contrast.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 09:09 AM
3

Yes. Generally, men stick around. Female friends drop off the radar after they get into a relationship, or they just generally become boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 09:06 AM
9

"There seems to be a bit of resentment for women in some spaces on here and a lot of times it’s not explained" It's been explained on numerous occasions, but you ignore what we men generally have to say about women till you get the answers you want to hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/20 09:05 AM
0

Lol you want us men with good genes to die. Not going to happen, fam. We are smart. We are powerful, we unite. We will cum into fair maidens without birth control. What can you do? Nothing. You think we deserve no children, but we will have sons and daughters.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 08:25 PM
0

I agree. Men must stand together. Feminists want to see us dead and childless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 08:22 PM
0

We will rise up. We will not let you make fun of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:21 PM
0

And we will do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:21 PM
1

We have good genes, and we will never hate ourselves. You want us to die and hate ourselves. No. We will love ourselves. You can't bring us down.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:20 PM
0

Oh how evil of you. You are against male interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:17 PM
1

Then we agree: high inhibition in men is bad for our sexual lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 06:18 PM
2

Because we legitimately enjoy your time and know it is not fake. Online relationships are fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 06:15 PM
2

Wow, you're making this racial. That is disgusting. I am liberal and do not care about race.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 06:07 PM
1

Why? I don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:36 PM
1

You have good points, sir. Those activities are commendable not just from a female perspective but from a male perspective as well. I would say that you are a high value person. Personally, speaking as a man who is heterosexual, I would want to be friends with you, based on your verbal acumen and our shared interests. In other words, you're 'cool'. You can obtain sex in spite of being a late boomer due to your coolness. I'm glad, and I wish the best for you. I think a high quality woman will wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:35 PM
1

We clearly can't communicate. We are on opposite sides, and that is good. War of the sexes is natural. Let us fight this war on opposite sides and appreciate that the both of us fight for different ends. Respect of the enemy is more wholesome than dehumanization. We can be friends on the battlefield. What do you say, rival? Can we be friends in blood, cum and war?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:28 PM
2

Agreed. You have a good head on your shoulders. Please continue to use it not just in dating, but in career and finances. If you do so, your life will continue upwards. Become the higher man, become the truth for yourself incarnate. Destroy myths, and relish in victory. Hail victory!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:26 PM
1

Lol you're the weird one, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:20 PM
0

Illiteracy is no excuse for a lack of argument, bro. Try again, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:19 PM
1

Good. Then we are on the same terms. We will always disagree and fight on opposite sides of the gender war, but we will remain true to our respective experiences and ideologies. This is good, pure, and wholesome, for we have chosen our sides. I welcome you to the battlefield of the sexes. He who dares wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:18 PM
1

I have them and they show better in real life. Real life dating is better for men like me. Online dating is a scam for men like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:16 PM
1

LMFAO. I have sex every day. I told men my experience, and how to achieve sex daily. That bothers you. Sorry, but not sorry little girl!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:14 PM
1

Lol I don't care how convinced you are. How narcissistic of you. I am telling the truth based on my own testimonial experiences. You're insane if you think I will recant based on your sniping at me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:11 PM
0

No, I meant what I said. Don't correct me. You're wrong, right. Now, take a hike. I'm sure you need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:10 PM
1

Ok dude. Keep posting gibberish. See where that leaves you. Spoiler alert: nowhere! Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:09 PM
3

She loves me. That bothers you. It bothers you that a man like me can find love and sex. That is the sick reality, and you are part of that sick reality. You rather me be single and sexless. However, I refuse. You have no power, and that bothers you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:08 PM
-3

Snark won't save you, hunny bunches.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:07 PM
12

Bingo! Women are mad that they are all chasing the same top 20% of men and wondering why such men won't commit to them. That is their fault, and I enjoy their frustration. In fact, their angst turns me on and validates my experiences as a man who is not of the top 20%. I love it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:06 PM
1

Yes, we fair better in real life. That is why redditors hate us. We can get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:02 PM
1

I have good experiences in social graces, if you had bothered to read. That is why online dating is worthless to me. I am far more charming, entertaining, and sexy in real life than I am online, due to my social graces and other abilities unrelated to my facial aesthetics. That is why online dating is a scam for me and other average men like me: we can get sex and relationships easier in real life than online dating and social media apps. Thus, the latter are a scam. You have yet to disprove me,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:00 PM
1

Don't tell me what will help me grow. I grew up. I grew up from nonsensical online dating and got and continue to obtain sex from real life encounters. I am only helping other men like me achieve the same ends. If that bothers you, and it clearly does, then you are part of the problem. You are the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:57 PM
1

Oh ok. Then I guess I can post gibberish and it's totally cool by your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:56 PM
-6

Oh good for you. You totally one upped me, bro. Have fun with your online nonsense. I'm going to vouch for what works for me and my kind. You are outside of scope, and therefore, unnecessary and inconsequential. You are the majority. I am the minority, and so are my kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:54 PM
1

Fair enough. I appreciate your sharing, since that matters. I too lost my virginity around the same time. Perhaps we have more in common than I realized. Still, why was online dating better for you as such a late boomer?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:53 PM
1

So, you are more attractive than me and other average men. That doesn't change the fact that online dating is a scam for us. Online dating works for you due to your facial aesthetics, which is why online dating does not work for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:32 PM
2

No, I don't care about women's issues. Women have feminism and traditional conservatism to advocate for their interests. They don't need nor want me. We men have nothing but our own backbones and collective networking to advocate for our interests. I focus on men's issues, as I am a man. Women can do what they want. However, we men must stick together and utilize our intellect and networking to achieve what is best for us collectively. Female approval is thus worth nothing to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:28 PM
1

That's a funny sentiment, considering online only caters to pretty boys and handsome men. Real life caters to the rest of us with skills in other areas. Online is hard mode for most men. Online dating is thus unnecessary effort and a scam.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:24 PM
24

It would disproportionately help men, which is why such a thing will not be approved.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:09 PM
1

That is why high inhibition is bad for men who wish to be sexually active. Women universally prefer men with less inhibition than they--the less inhibition and more tattoos, the better. I am slagging off men such as myself. I am correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:05 PM
2

You must be handsome. I have never seen such a high success rate from average and below average men. Good for you, but that is not the reality for lost of us. Please take our experiences and feelings into consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:03 PM
0

Lol proving my point, bro. Men like me, who have things to offer other than facial aesthetics, including yes, height, can get more sex in real life than dating and social media apps. Have you disproven my assertion? No. You have not. Clout means nothing in social media and dating apps, only facial aesthetics. Clout means something in real life. You are proving my point. One doesn't need to be my height to get sex in real life, but he must be more attractive than me to get sex online. If that is …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:01 PM
0

Exactly. Thus, online dating is futile to men like me and most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:51 PM
2

You are actually proving my point: men of average attractiveness who are not boring lugs, as you put it, have a better chance in real life than online, because online only values facial aesthetics in men. Men of average or below average looks, such as myself, who are not boring, will have more sexual success in real life due to our personalities. Sorry, but this is the truth. Average men should delete their useless apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:48 PM
1

Yes, but I am speaking about men, not women. High inhibition women have more sex than high inhibition men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:45 PM
2

That is the false allure of dating apps: low to minimum effort without reward. However, I will ask you, since you are keen on these scams, how many women have you slept with using solely dating apps as opposed to real life socialization? Of those women, how many turned out to be long term relationships with repeated sexual encounters?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:44 PM
2

Women don't like men with low inhibitions period. We are best off pretending to have low inhibitions while maintaining high inhibitions in matters such as health, finances, and career. If women know we have low inhibitions in all areas of life, we average and below average men will not fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:36 PM
-14

My face is average, "dummy". Don't talk down to me unless you expect to be intellectually destroyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:30 PM
1

Lol no, I am not a sociopath. I also do not ascribe to heterosexual masculine norms. As a man, I sexually ascribe to what benefits me, as all men should.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:29 PM
1

There is no so-called groove to be found on a platform which values male facial aesthetics over all other attributes. Online dating is a scam for men of average and below average facial aesthetics. We can get sex and companionship far easier in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:28 PM
1

Yes, I can. People in a society act in accordance with their own personal benefits. When my personal benefits do not align with their personal benefits, then being good is a maladaption.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:15 PM
0

Yes, I can. It's simple: my girlfriend has sex with me, because she loves traits other than AND INCLUDING my physical appearance. That would not be possible with online dating apps, which only value appearance in a man. I gained more in real life with a real life girlfriend than I ever will with online dating. Get wrecked. I proved you wrong. Now, you must sulk in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:02 PM
3

That is also true of real life dating which grants more sex to men who are average and below average, such as myself. We do not benefit from online dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 02:58 PM
1

Online dating still sounds like a waste of time better utilized dating real women in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 02:54 PM
1

I don't think so. I got nowhere online. I prefer real life encounters where I can gauge a woman's interest in me. Women online will flirt but not go on a date with me. Women in real life will happily date me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 02:31 PM
2

Because dating apps are shit for average men like me. It is easier and more efficient to date in real life. Online "dating" (it's only dating if you're successful) hurts our chances, in that such activity is wasted time better spent on real women met in real places in real life. We gain nothing from online dating and social media, but we have a chance in the real world of dating. Thus, energy and time are best spent in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 02:30 PM
-10

Good point. You raise a good question. I am 6'2, white, working class with a good job, make friends easily, good genes, out of shape/fat, and have an average face. With that in mind, I fall in the realm of average for American females. I am neither attractive nor unattractive. My success hinges on my social graces. My best attrobutes, as with all average men, are beat shown in person as opposed to online.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 02:26 PM
3

That's why online interactions are a waste of time. Online interactions with women are inherently a waste of time, but real life interactions, not necessarily. I don't understand why a man should be active on social media and dating sites.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 02:04 PM
4

It's not weird at all. You are being smart and efficient. It is easier for average men to obtain sex in real life than it is online. You are merely taking the most efficient route. I am glad it works for you, as it has me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:58 PM
3

I am often likened to Jon Snow where it comes to my features.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:55 PM
3

No, I asked out women who I met in real life and deleted all social media and dating apps. The result was real, genuine loving sex. Messaging women in apps is a waste of time. Why does it bother you that I chose the most optimal route?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:50 PM
0

Well, your assumption is wrong. Sorry, you are wrong. That is a risk one takes with speculation. You speculated and lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:45 PM
2

I think you are right, in that I see no evidence to the contrary. Excellent insight, friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:37 PM
0

You have not disproven my initial assertion, which is that average men gain more sex via old school socialization than by social media and online dating apps. In other words, why choose the hard way, when you can choose the way which requires significant but acceptable amounts of effort? I truly do not understand why you vouch for a less than optimal method.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:35 PM
0

Very funny. I have social connections. You know nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:31 PM
1

That's hilarious in that it can't be further from the truth for most men. We fuck less on dating apps than we do real life interactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:24 PM
1

Regarding my face raring, I am of average attentiveness. I have good genes and am healthy, but I am not handsome. I am merely normal and thus average.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:22 PM
6

Due to limited time and energy, choosing the most optimal strategy is the best one. Plus, women gain from we average males leaving the online dating market. There are bonuses for both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:20 PM
2

Exactly. Sex is more than appearances. For instance, my girlfriend does not turn me on as much as some women, but she is like me in many ways and requires me to be the best man I can be. We both reach orgasm regularly. We want sex before and after bed every day. We cannot be abused or manipulated, for we trust each other. We are a partnership of sex, love, and security. Our relationship was in spite of our culture, and totally doborced from dating and social media apps. Now, we have as much sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:10 PM
1

While I know you are genuine, I must say that such a strategy is silly. Men who have something going for them, such as myself, but are not handsome, also such as myself, can obtain sex far easier via old school socialization. Online dating is still a waste of time for most men. We as men must recognize this for progress to occur.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 01:00 PM
3

No, it is not. But I believe attractiveness in a man is more than his face. We can be attractive in our bodies, intellect, the way in which we carry ourselves, our charm, our ability to face danger, our courage, our strength to withstand assaults from all ends. In summary, I believe that we men have more to offer than a pretty face. I have more to offer, and I know it. That is why I have emancipated myself from apps which prioritize facial attractiveness. Such a decision has delivered me more se…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 12:56 PM
4

I am 27 and American located in the South, though I am originally from Minnesota. My accent helps, but I truly believe the accent differential is negligible. I saw far better results in real life dating. I even had some women invite me to their homes without sex, which is nigh impossible in dating and social media apps. I swear that I am telling the truth as a young man of a stage attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 12:52 PM
1

Because men and women want different things. I am pro-male, not anti-female. This means that while I am educated on female needs and anatomy, I am only interested in male interests. Females have their own abilities, interests, political factions, and do not thus require my support or consideration as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 12:39 PM
2

Thank you. That makes a heck of a lot more sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 12:20 PM
1

No, because that is not what women want. I don't want people to want things that they do not want.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 12:19 PM
2

Ok. How often do average guys in the UK get laid by using dating apps? Obviously, getting laid by a woman that he met outside of online dating does not count.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:43 AM
1

I'd say no man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:41 AM
6

Short answer: there are none. There is no benefit to dating MEN with high inhibition. We tend to have low partner counts, have little to no tattoos, and are considered less than sexy "nerds". We could be riskier, but our preoccupations with financially stability, health, and career prevents our doing so. We are what you call beta bux. We are the last to fuck, and the first to pay. There is nothing sexy about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:41 AM
2

Morons who do not understand the value of money, but came upon disposable money anyway. They legitimately think that female approval is worth money. It is not. Female approval is worth the value of dog shit. Economically challenged people do not stay financially endowed long.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:34 AM
1

They would respond like the rest of the people on this thread. Theres nothing wrong with the OP's question; you just have nothing important to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:31 AM
1

It is exactly like praising ones dog, which is why no man with dignity wants to be a "good man".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:30 AM
1

Females only care to the extent that they get free shit from men. However, the OP is talking about relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:30 AM
1

If a man isn't a member of a good society, and if he doesn't fit into said society, which is indeed not a good society, then he is actually a good person by your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:29 AM
1

OP is right. There is no logical reason to be a gentleman. Never give anyone anything for free, particularly females.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:27 AM
1

Goodness for its own sake is a surefire means of being taken advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:25 AM
1

Your final paragraph is correct. "Good man" and any alteration thereof is defined as a man who submits to the feminine imperative. In the real world, this practically means catering to a female's whimsy. When a man says "good boy" to a dog, that is what females mean by a "good man". No man who values his dignity seeks to be a "good man".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:25 AM
2

Online dating and social media are scams for most men. Those services cater solely to women and handsome men. Average men can get sex and even a girlfriend through face to face socializing far easier and more quickly with less frustration. Online dating is a scam.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:15 AM
5

Good for you. You're good looking then. Tinder doesn't work for most men. For us it's a scam
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:12 AM
1

Yet your marriage doesn't contradict anything TRP or MGTOW is saying. It's more of the same old stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 11:08 AM
1

So? Most men don't engage in those activities, but we have to deal with misandrists like yourself. You get the benefit of the doubt, because society is gynocentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 03:57 AM
0

Excellent observation! However, that only applies to dating. Men are being hurt disproportionately more due to gym shutdowns and job loss. So, I would say men are as if not more affected, whereas women are primarily affected in dating. That being said, I don't sympathize a bit. When men are lonely, we are mocked. When women are lonely, it's somehow a problem. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 08:56 PM
1

Your husband has had more partners than average. Sounds like you married a good-looking man with a high partner count, which is the gold standard amongst western women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 08:51 PM
4

Bingo! OP's post is nothing but female rationalization and socially approved hogwash. The fact is that women perceive men who are sexually active as sexually attractive due to factors unrelated to physical appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 08:50 PM
1

No, it is not obvious and clearly wrong. Men with higher partner counts are viewed as more attractive by women due to factors unrelated to physical appearance. A man's attractiveness can be boosted by bedding more women, supposing that his sexual activity is known to the women around him.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 08:48 PM
2

No. Women are more obese than ever in history, and men have always preferred slimmer waistlines. Porn is irrelevant. Most men are happier having sex with an average to below average woman than they are jerking off to porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 08:44 PM
1

It's simple: society caters to women more than men. There is overwhelming more empathy in the world for men than there is for women. Men affected disproportionately more by a particular issue will be stigmatized or bullied, whereas women can complain with no repercussions. It has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with Western gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 08:40 PM
1

Do you enjoy lying as much as you enjoy seeing men suffer?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 08:45 PM
0

No, you're being smart. Pretty women tend to have bad personalities and be more hypergamous. Hot bad boys will flirt with her. They are more maintenance and not worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 01:32 PM
1

Women do the same thing, so why shouldn't men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 01:30 PM
1

You must be really attractive for that to work for you. Most girls don't want to have sex with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 11:27 PM
3

I require the woman be attracted to me, but I don't require to be attracted to the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 11:25 PM
0

Females are free creatures and can fuck whomever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:31 PM
1

Yes, I believe most women cheat if given enough time. The evidence suuports this assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:30 PM
0

I agree. Men do not need the approval of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:27 PM
2

This is cruel. People like you disgust me. You want men like me to be drugged, because we are unattractive. I refuse! There is nothing you can do about it. We can do as we please with our lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:26 PM
4

As a man with a girlfriend who is also unattractive, I encourage sexless men to withhold their resources, time, and energy from women, and to pursue activities divorced from feminine approval. Create counter cultures, art, and social clubs. Exclude women from their lives as much as possible. Society may look down on us, but we can have the company of one another. It is only due to our oppression that we think it shameful to proud and supportive of one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:25 PM
7

Young men owe society nothing, and that is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:19 PM
3

I agree with your assessment, except I believe this is a good thing. Spread the word! The more men who realize that they are unattractive to women due to their looks and low social status, the more of them will curate counter cultures and social clubs where the approval of women is of no concern to them. They will inevitably choose to withhold their energy, time, and money from women wholesale, and embrace new pursuits outside the purview of sex and resource acquisition. If women do not owe men …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 07:18 PM
2

Good. Tinder is a scam for most men. The more men who realize that, the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 06:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter